DOWNLOAD MOVIE GUIDE to ALL the PRESIDENT's MEN from 2002 Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DOWNLOAD MOVIE GUIDE to ALL the PRESIDENT's MEN from 2002 Edition COMMUNICATION: JOURNALISM EDUCATION TODAY © 2014 JOURNALISM EDUCATION ASSOCIATION Your use of material obtained from the Journalism Education Association, including this digital copy of Communication: Journalism Education Today or excerpt indicates that you are aware of the following. • The content of this digital information is for your own personal, non- commercial use only, including use in your classroom. • You may distribute this material in any form, print or digital, to students in your classroom — not to others. • You may upload this material to any password-protected website for use by students in your classroom. • Content in this magazine remains copyrighted by the authors while the Journalism Education Association retains copyright to the magazine itself. For more information, visit http://jea.org/home/for-educators/cjet/. JEA.ORG PUBLICATIONS EDITOR Bradley Wilson, MJE, Ph.D. [email protected] ASSISTANT EDITOR Howard Spanogle COPY EDITOR Connie Fulkerson ADVERTISING COORDINATOR Pam Boller W: 785-532-5532 Fax: 785-532-5563 [email protected] SEND CHANGES OF ADDRESS TO: Journalism Education Association Kansas State University 103 Kedzie Hall Manhattan, KS 66506-1505 785-532-5532 S PECIAL R EPORT SPECIAL “The process bugging device. REPORT James W. McCord, a former CIA employee, BY BRADLEY WILSON was being held in the District of Columbia. jail on $30,000 bond yesterday. The other four were being held on $50,000 bond. All are charged with attempted burglary and attempted interception of telephone and All The Presidentother conversati’son s.Men But on June 17, 1972, in an era following the assassination of President Kennedy and at the height of the unpopular Vietnam War, it was this botched burglary that was the beginning of a chain of events that would ultimately result in the resignation of the How two president of the United States and dozens of other top officials. Richard Nixon, on an edition of “Meet the Press” journalists after his resignation, said, “It was a small thing that had become a big thing. It was a small thing, the break in. It was the cover-up that was wrong. That Photo John was the big thing. There was no doubt about that Mitchell ess at all.” Pr But doubt, doubt about all facets of the cover-up, Associated Press Photo the investigation and the involvement of the presi- Associated a president dent — what did he know and when did he know it check. When Woodward and Bob Carl Bernstein — pervaded American society in the early ’70s. In their original story published in the Washington “The processand liv edis Post June 19, 1972, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward quoted former Attorney General John N. Mitchell and then head of the Committee for the youto c hecusek Re-Election of the President saying McCord and the to tell about it. other four men arrested at Democratic headquarters Saturday “were not operating either in our behalf or and doublecheck. with our consent” in the alleged bugging attempt. GOP National Chairman Bob Dole issued a simi- lar statement, adding, “We deplore action of this . When you use kind in or touthe bookof politics.” in y our classroom an unnamedo r t e a c h i n g t h e m o v i e a n d A g u i d e f Democratic National Committee Chairman Lawrence F. O’Brien said the “bugging incident ... an unnamed raised the ugliest questions about the integrity of the political process that I have encountered in a quarter century.” Breaking into an office in the Watergate sixth floor of the Watergate hotel source, But throughout the debacle, the Watergate inci- sourcehotel and office building,, even today, and office building. dent brought out the true character of the president might amount to little more than burglary The suspects had photographic and certainly called into question his integrity. He charges. equipment and electronic surveil- was obsessed with enemies, obsessed with settling it’s allThe newson briefy ourmight read something lance instruments capable of inter- scores. He was obsessed with vengeance and kept a like this. cepting both regular conversation long list of enemies. Five suspects, well-dressed, and telephone communication. shoulders.” On an episode of “Meet the Press” in June 2002, it’s all wearinong rubber sur giycal glovesour and Police also said two ceiling panels Bernstein said, “What’s so fascinating about watch- unarmed, were arrested about 2:30 near Democratic National Committee ing Nixon is that to him it was about a break in. a.m. Saturday after police surprised Chairman Lawrence F. O’Brien’s office This, Watergate, was about the real identity of this them inside the 29-office suite of had been removed in such a way as presidency.” the Democratic headquarters on the to make it possible to slip in a shoulders.” Bernstein and Woodward inspired a generation of FAll 2002 communicAtion: JournAlism educAtion todAy •‑13 S PECIAL R EPORT “The process bugging device. James W. McCord, a former CIA employee, was being held in the District of Columbia. jail on $30,000 bond yesterday. The other four were being held on $50,000 bond. All are charged with attempted burglary and attempted interception of telephone and other conversations. But on June 17, 1972, in an era following the assassination of President Kennedy and at the height of the unpopular Vietnam War, it was this botched burglary that was the beginning of a chain of events that would ultimately result in the resignation of the president of the United States and dozens of other top officials. Richard Nixon, on an edition of “Meet the Press” after his resignation, said, “It was a small thing that had become a big thing. It was a small thing, the break in. It was the cover-up that was wrong. That was the big thing. There was no doubt about that John Mitchell at all.” But doubt, doubt about all facets of the cover-up, Associated Press Photo the investigation and the involvement of the presi- check. When dent — what did he know and when did he know it — pervaded American society in the early ’70s. In their original story published in the Washington “The process is Post June 19, 1972, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward quoted former Attorney General John N. Mitchell and then head of the Committee for the youto c hecusek Re-Election of the President saying McCord and the other four men arrested at Democratic headquarters Saturday “were not operating either in our behalf or and doublecheck. with our consent” in the alleged bugging attempt. GOP National Chairman Bob Dole issued a simi- lar statement, adding, “We deplore action of this an Whunnameden you use kind in or out of politics.” Democratic National Committee Chairman Lawrence F. O’Brien said the “bugging incident ... an unnamed raised the ugliest questions about the integrity of the political process that I have encountered in a quarter century.” sourcesource, , But throughout the debacle, the Watergate inci- dent brought out the true character of the president and certainly called into question his integrity. He it’s all on your was obsessed with enemies, obsessed with settling scores. He was obsessed with vengeance and kept a long list of enemies. it’s allshoulder ons. ” your On an episode of “Meet the Press” in June 2002, Bernstein said, “What’s so fascinating about watch- ing Nixon is that to him it was about a break in. This, Watergate, was about the real identity of this presidency.” shoulders.” Bernstein and Woodward inspired a generation of 14 •‑communicAtion: JournAlism educAtion todAy FAll 2002 All The President’s Men reporters with their in-depth stories and their ability we were to break that pledge, our work as a reporter to continue following the story when everyone said would be over.” there was no story. But the use of anonymous sources, when there is On a Discovery Channel special on the 30th no alternative, also brings even more responsibility anniversary of Watergate John Dean said, “They did to the journalist, Woodward said. keep attention to this story when no one else was “The process is to check and doublecheck. When reporting it. They gave validity to the story.” you use an unnamed source, it’s all on your shoul- They couldn’t have done it without their still ders.” unnamed source, “Deep Throat,” a secret source Along these lines, Bernstein said there were many that lurked in the shadows of Woodward’s and lessons that could be learned from Watergate. Bernstein’s book and subsequent movie, All the “The lessons have to do with being careful, with President’s Men. using multiple sources, to putting information in “It’s probably the best kept secret in the world,” context, to not being swayed by gossip, by sensa- Bernstein said. tionalism, by manufactured controversy, all of which What we know about “Deep Throat” (the name have come to dominate our journalistic agenda in obtained from a pornographic movie of the time) the past 30 years. The real thing is sketchy at best. He could never be quoted, even is about responsibility.” anonymously, for fear of being identified. He had to While Richard Nixon be in the White House continuously from May of may have, as he said, “let the 1972. He sometimes fed bad information. He drank American people down,” he too Scotch. And, rather than feeding factual informa- acknowledged the responsibility tion, he often offered guidance. he held. Only three people, Woodward, Bernstein and for- “The man at the top must mer Washington Post Editor Ben Bradlee, know Deep bear the responsibility. The Throat’s identity, something that hasn’t stopped a responsibility belongs here in generation of people from guessing.
Recommended publications
  • Begin Video Clip
    C-SPAN FIRST LADIES/JACQUELINE KENNEDY May 09, 2014 9:56 a.m. ET (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) JACQUELINE KENNEDY: And I think every first lady should do something in this position to help the things she cares about. I just think that everything in the White House should be the best -- the entertainment that's given here. The art of children is the same the world over. And so, of course, is our feeling for children. I think it is good in a world where there's quite enough to divide people, that we should cherish the language and emotion that unite us all. (END VIDEO CLIP) SUSAN SWAIN: Jacqueline Kennedy's 1,000 days as first lady were defined by images -- political spouse, young mother, fashion icon, advocate for the arts. As television came of age, it was ultimately the tragic images of President Kennedy's assassination and funeral that cemented Jacqueline Kennedy in the public consciousness. Good evening and welcome to C-SPAN's series "First Ladies: Influence and Image.” Tonight, we'll tell you the story of the wife of the 35th president of the United States, named Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy. And we have two guests at the table for the next two hours to tell you more about her life story. Michael Beschloss, presidential historian, author of many books on the presidency, and has a special focus over the years on the Cold War era and the Kennedy administration. Thanks for being here. MICHAEL BESCHLOSS: Pleasure. SWAIN: Barbara Perry is a UVA political scientist and as part of the "Modern First Ladies" series at the University of Kansas has written a Jacqueline Kennedy biography.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex-Spy Says She Drove to Dallas with Oswald & Kennedy 'Assassin
    Ex-Spy Says She Drove To Dallas With Oswald & Kennedy 'Assassin Squad' By PAUL MESKIL A former spy says that she accompanied Lee Harvey Oswald and an "assassin squad" to Dallas a few days before President Kennedy was murdered there Nov. 22, 1963. The House Assassinations Committee is investigating her story. Marita Lorenz, former undercov- er operative for the CIA and FBI, told The News that her companions on the car trip from Miami to Dallas were Os. wald, CIA contract agent Frank Sturgis, Cuban exile leaders Orlando Bosch and Pedro Diaz Lanz, and two Cuban broth- ers whose names she does not know. She said they were all members of Operation 40, a secret guerrilla group originally formed by the CIA in 1960 in preparation for the Bay of Pigs inva- sion. Statements she made to The News and to a federal agent were reported to Robert Blakey, chief counsel of the Assassinations Committee. He has as- signed one of his top investigators to interview her. Ms. Lorenz described Operation 40 as an ''assassination squad" consisting of about 30 anti-Castro Cubans and their American advisers. She claimed the group conspired to kill Cuban Premier Fidel Castro and President Kennedy, whom it blamed for the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Admitted Taking Part Sturgis admitted in an interview two years ago that he took part in Opera- Maritza Lorenz tion 40. "There are reports that Opera- Farmer CIA agent tion 40 had an assassination squad." he said. "I'm not saying that personally ... In the summer or early fall of 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • The Watergate Story (Washingtonpost.Com)
    The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) Hello corderoric | Change Preferences | Sign Out TODAY'S NEWSPAPER Subscribe | PostPoints NEWS POLITICS OPINIONS BUSINESS LOCAL SPORTS ARTS & GOING OUT JOBS CARS REAL RENTALS CLASSIFIEDS LIVING GUIDE ESTATE SEARCH: washingtonpost.com Web | Search Archives washingtonpost.com > Politics> Special Reports 'Deep Throat' Mark Felt Dies at 95 The most famous anonymous source in American history died Dec. 18 at his home in Santa Rosa, Calif. "Whether ours shall continue to be a government of laws and not of men is now before Congress and ultimately the American people." A curious crime, two young The courts, the Congress and President Nixon refuses to After 30 years, one of reporters, and a secret source a special prosecutor probe release the tapes and fires the Washington's best-kept known as "Deep Throat" ... the burglars' connections to special prosecutor. A secrets is exposed. —Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox after his Washington would be the White House and decisive Supreme Court firing, Oct. 20, 1973 changed forever. discover a secret taping ruling is a victory for system. investigators. • Q&A Transcript: John Dean's new book "Pure Goldwater" (May 6, 2008) • Obituary: Nixon Aide DeVan L. Shumway, 77 (April 26, 2008) Wg:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/watergate/index.html#chapters[6/14/2009 6:06:08 PM] The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) • Does the News Matter To Anyone Anymore? (Jan. 20, 2008) • Why I Believe Bush Must Go (Jan. 6, 2008) Key Players | Timeline | Herblock
    [Show full text]
  • The Impartiality Paradox
    The Impartiality Paradox Melissa E. Loewenstemt The constitutional principles that bind our free society instruct that the American people must "hold the judgeship in the highest esteem, that they re- gard it as the symbol of impartial, fair, and equal justice under law."'1 Accord- ingly, in contrast with the political branches, the Supreme Court's decisions "are legitimate only when [the Court] seeks to dissociate itself from individual 2 or group interests, and to judge by disinterested and more objective standards." As Justice Frankfurter said, "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice. 3 Almost instinctively, once a President appoints a judge to sit on the Su- preme Court,4 the public earmarks the Justice as an incarnation of impartiality, neutrality, and trustworthiness. Not surprisingly then, Presidents have looked to the Court for appointments to high profile and important committees of national concern. 5 It is among members of the judiciary that a President can find individuals certain to obtain the immediate respect of the American people, and often the world community. It is a judge's neutrality, fair-mindedness, and integrity that once again label him a person of impartiality and fairness, a per- son who seeks justice, and a President's first choice to serve the nation. The characteristics that led to a judge's initial appointment under our adversary sys- tem, and which lend themselves to appearances of propriety and justice in our courts, often carry over into extrajudicial activities as well. As Ralph K. Winter, Jr., then a professor at the Yale Law School, stated: [t]he appointment of a Justice of the Supreme Court to head a governmental com- mission or inquiry usually occurs because of the existence of a highly controversial issue which calls for some kind of official or authoritative resolution ....And the use of Supreme Court Justices, experience shows, is generally prompted by a presi- t Yale Law School, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • John Greenewald, Jr., Creator Of: the Black Vault
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOI/PA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET FOI/PA# 1212526-0 Total Deleted Page(s) = 12 Page 30 - Referral/Consult; Page 31 - Referral/Consult; Page 50 - Referral/Direct; Page 51 - Referral/Direct; Page 52 - Referral/Direct; Page 53 - Referral/Direct; Page 54 - Referral/Direct; Page 55 - Referral/Direct; Page 56 - Referral/Direct; Page 57 - Referral/Direct; Page 58 - Referral/Direct; Page 59 - Referral/Direct; xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X Deleted Page(s) X X No Duplication Fee X X For this Page X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx P'7,,____y =___ E!:)-36 (Rev. 11-17-88) ~- FBI TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION:• 0 Teletype 0 Immediate 0 TOP SECRET 0 Facsimile 0 Priority 0 SECRET !KJ AIRTEL 0 Routine 0 CONFIDENTIAL 0 UNCLAS E F T 0 0 UNCLAS Date 11/19/92 INVEST DIV, DOMESTIC TERRORISM UNIT b6 (2 MM-61560) (FCI-1) (P) b7C ,..;; b6 aka - I I b7C AL; OF 0 I ( Reference FBIHQ te1ca1l to Miami 11/17/92. Enclosed for FBIHQ are three copies of a sel~­ explanatory LHM suitable for dissemination. Per referenced telcall advising of DOJ authority, Miami has initiated a Neutrality case on captioned matter. b6 ~~~~~~lis a well known anti-Castro activist in the Miami b7c ____The following is a descrigtion o~ NAME RACE b6 __{jJ__ SEX.* = DOB b7Cc=J ~ -~ SSAN All INFORMATION CONTAINED "i"LA DL HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Rise of the Appellate Litigator
    Observations on the Rise of the Appellate Litigator Thomas G. Hungar and Nikesh Jindal* I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................511 II. THE EMERGENCE OF A PRIVATE APPELLATE BAR ...................512 III. The Reasons Behind the Development of a Private Appellate Bar..........................................................................517 A. Appellate Practices as a Response to Modern Law Firm Economics ..............................................................518 B. Increasing Sophistication Among Clients About the Need for High-Quality Appellate Representation ...........523 C. The Increasing Stakes of Civil Litigation........................525 D. A Changing Supreme Court ............................................527 IV. SKILLS OF AN EFFECTIVE APPELLATE LAWYER.......................529 V. CONCLUSION ...........................................................................536 I. INTRODUCTION Over the last few decades, there has been a noticeable increase in the visibility and prominence of appellate litigators in the private bar. Most of the attention has focused on Supreme Court advocacy, where certain private law firms and lawyers have developed reputations for specialized expertise and experience in 1 briefing and arguing cases before the Court, but the phenomenon extends to other federal and state court appeals as well. The practice of law as a whole is becoming increasingly specialized, and the trend in appellate litigation is no exception, although it appears to be a more recent occurrence than the growth of substantive speciali- * Thomas G. Hungar is a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Co- Chair of the firm’s Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice Group. He previously served as Deputy Solicitor General of the United States. Nikesh Jindal is an associate at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and a member of the firm’s Litigation Department and of the Administrative Law and Regulatory and White Collar Defense and Investigations Practice Groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission on CIA Activities Within the United States: Chapter 19
    Chapter 19 Allegations Concerning the Assassination of President Kenned@ ,Illegations hare been made that the CIA participated in the assassination of President ,John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. on h’ovember 22. 1963. Two different. theories have been advanced in support of those allegations. One theory is that E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis, on behalf of the CIA, personally participated in the assassination. The other is that the CIA had connections with Lee Harvey Oswald or Jack Ruby. or both of them. and that those connections somehow led to t.he assassination. The Commission staff has investigated these allegations. Neither the staff nor the Commission undertook a full review of the Report of the Warren Commission. Such a task would have been outsicle the scope of the Executive Order establishing this Commis- sion, and would hare diverted the time of the Commission from its proper function. The investigation was limited to determining whether there was any credible evidence pointing to CIA involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy. A. The Theory That Hunt and Sturgis Participated in the Assassination The first of t.he theories involves charges that E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis, both convicted of burglarizing the Democrst:ic Na- tional Committee headquarters at the Watergate in 1972, were CIA employees or agents at the time of the assassination of the President in 1963. It is further alleged that they were together in Dallas on the day of the assassination and that shortly after the assassination they were found in a railroad boxcar situated behind the “grassy knoll,” an area located to the right front of the Presidential car at the time of the assassination.
    [Show full text]
  • CIA Agent Confesses Plotting
    LA VERDAD NO SE PUEDE TAPIR CON TODA LA TIERRA 4/12/75 DEL MUNDO. knew to be connected with the CAA, he said. His own rule had been limited to Jack Anderson helping "set up" assassination attempts. He had never taken part in any actual murders, he swore. All the assassination plots, he explain- CIA agent ed, had been aimed against foreign lead- ers, none against American citizens. Most of the attempts had failed, he said, al- confesses though he was involved in the advanc4 work that led to the successful assassina- tion of Dictator Trujillo in the Dominican plotting Republic. Sturgis described Cuba as the "hub" of WASHINGTON — In secret testimony assassination schemes. He personally had- before the Rockefeller Commiision, participated in plots, he said, against.. Watergate burglar Frank Sturgis has con- several Cuban leaders from Fidel Castro fessed that he was involved in several CIA on down. assassination plots. The special commission headed by Vice But he has emphatically denied charges President Nelson Rockefeller is examin- that he was in Dallas on the day President ing "evidence" which allegedly links Stur- Kennedy was shot or that he had anything gis and Hunt to the Kennedy assassins: to do with the Kennedy assassination. Lion. The chief exhibit is a picture of two Sturgis offered to take a lie detector test vagrants, resembling Sturgis and Hunt, if the commission had any doubt that he who were picked up in Dallas after the. was telling the truth. No polygraph test; assassination. however, was administered. Upon close examination, the picture of Watergate conspirator E.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregg Herken Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c80g3rb2 No online items Partial Inventory of the Gregg Herken papers Stephanie Watson Hoover Institution Archives © 2017, 2020 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Partial Inventory of the Gregg 2018C14 1 Herken papers Title: Gregg Herken papers Date (inclusive): 1937-2014 Collection Number: 2018C14 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English . Physical Description: 12 manuscript boxes, 6 card file boxes, 1 oversize box, 1 sound tape reel(7.2 Linear Feet) Abstract: Interview recordings and transcripts, notes, correspondence, photocopies of government and other documents, and printed matter relating to the development of the atomic bomb. Used as research material for the book by Gregg Herken, Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence and Edward Teller (New York, 2002).The collection also contains research materials on Cold War strategy and espionage, used in Herken's The Georgetown Set (2014). Hoover Institution Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Gregg Herken papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 2017. Biographical Note American historian. Scope and Content of Collection Interview recordings and transcripts, notes, correspondence, photocopies of government and other documents, and printed matter relating to the development of the atomic bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation
    Wyoming Law Review Volume 1 Number 1 Article 7 January 2001 Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation Joel L. Selig Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr Recommended Citation Selig, Joel L. (2001) "Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation," Wyoming Law Review: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr/vol1/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wyoming Law Review by an authorized editor of Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. Selig: Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation BOOK REVIEW, COMMENTARY, AND APPRECIATION ARCHIBALD COX: CONSCIENCE OF A NATION. By Ken Gormley.! Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. 1997. Pp. xxii, 585. $30.00 ($18.00 paperback (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus. 1999)). Reviewed by Joel L. Selig* I. There are not many accounts of lives in the law that can be rec- ommended without reservation to students, lawyers, and general readers. One that can be so recommended is Ken Gormley's well-researched, well-crafted and readable biography of Archibald Cox. This recommen- dation can be made without regard to the prospective reader's special- ized interests or legal or political philosophy. Cox's most memorable moment in the limelight, and the one with the largest audience, was his October 20, 1973, press conference in which he explained why, in his capacity as Watergate special prosecutor, he was insisting that President Richard M. Nixon produce a limited num- ber of specified White House tape recordings (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cover-Up Unravels
    The Roots of Watergate Tactics used by Nixon’s supporters to try to ensure his reelection in 1972 led to the Watergate scandal. Section 2 The Roots of Watergate (cont.) • The Watergate scandal began when the Nixon administration tried to cover up its involvement in the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters, along with other illegal actions. • Many scholars believe the roots of the Watergate scandal lay in Nixon’s character and the atmosphere that he and his advisers created in the White House. Section 2 The Roots of Watergate (cont.) • As part of their efforts to help the president win reelection, Nixon’s advisers ordered five men to break into the headquarters and steal any sensitive campaign information. • They were also to place wiretaps on the office telephones. • The media discovered that one of the burglars, James McCord, was not only an ex-CIA official but also a member of the Committee for the Re-election of the President (CRP). Section 2 The Roots of Watergate (cont.) • Reports also surfaced that the burglars had been paid to execute the break-in from a secret CRP fund controlled by the White House. • Meanwhile, few people paid much attention to the scandal during the 1972 campaign, and Nixon won by a landslide. Section 2 The Cover-Up Unravels The president’s refusal to cooperate with Congress only focused attention on his possible involvement. Section 2 The Cover-Up Unravels (cont.) • Under relentless prodding from federal judge John J. Sirica, McCord agreed to testify before the newly created Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Watergate, Multiple Conspiracies, and the White House Tapes
    Do Not Delete 8/1/2012 8:26 PM Watergate, Multiple Conspiracies, and the White House Tapes Arnold Rochvarg* On January 1, 1975, John Mitchell, former United States Attorney General, John Ehrlichman, former Chief White House Assistant for Domestic Affairs, H.R. Haldeman, former White House Chief of Staff, and Robert Mardian, former Assistant Attorney General, were convicted of conspiracy1 for their involvement in what is generally known as “Watergate.”2 The Watergate conspiracy trial, presided over by Judge John Sirica, had run from October 1, 1974 until December 27, 1974.3 The trial included the in-court testimony of most of the figures involved in the Watergate scandal,4 and the playing of thirty of the “White House tapes.”5 The purpose of this Symposium article is to discuss whether the evidence presented at the Watergate trial is better understood as evidence of multiple conspiracies, as argued by two of the defendants,6 or as a single conspiracy as argued by the prosecution. The article first will set forth the law on multiple conspiracies and apply that law to the evidence presented at the Watergate conspiracy trial. The article will then discuss whether the admission into evidence of certain White House tapes premised on the single conspiracy view may have prejudiced any of the convicted defendants. I. THE LAW OF MULTIPLE CONSPIRACIES It is not uncommon at a criminal conspiracy trial, or on appeal from a conviction of conspiracy, for a defendant to argue that a guilty verdict for * Professor, University of Baltimore School of Law. Professor Rochvarg was a member of the legal defense team that represented Robert Mardian in the appeal of his conviction of conspiracy at the Watergate conspiracy trial.
    [Show full text]