Estimating Vector Autoregressions Using Methods Not Based on Explicit Economic Theories (P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Estimating Vector Autoregressions Using Methods Not Based on Explicit Economic Theories (P 4 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review Summer 1979 A Way to Improve Economic Forecasting tP. n Help for the Regional Economic Forecaster: Vector Autoregression <P. 2) Estimating Vector Autoregressions Using Methods Not Based on Explicit Economic Theories (P. 8) District Conditions (p. 16) Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review voi.3,no.3 This publication primarily presents economic research aimed at improving policymaking by the Federal Reserve System and other governmental authorities. Produced in the Research Department. Edited by Arthur J. Rolnick, Kathleen S. Rolfe, and Alan Struthers, Jr. Graphic design by Phil Swenson, Graphic Services Department. Address requests for additional copies to the Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480. The views expressed herein are those of the authors Articles may be reprinted if the source is credited and the Research and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Department is provided with copies of reprints. Bank of Minneapolis or the Federal Reserve System. Estimating Vector Autoregressions Using Methods Not Based on Explicit Economic Theories Thomas J. Sargent Adviser, Research Department Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and Professor of Economics University of Minnesota This paper describes procedures for analyzing in- often must restrict the domain of the questions to terrelated time series1 which are mainly intended which answers are sought if Lucas' criticism is not as an alternative to using structural econometric to be operative. models as forecasting devices. Alternatives to the structural models have been sought because of in- Vector Autoregressions creasingly compelling suspicions that the a priori For the purposes of making forecasts and dis- restrictions used in existing structural models are playing its operating characteristics, a linear not implied by good dynamic economic theory and econometric model is often represented as a par- that the interpretations and policy conclusions ticular set of random difference equations called a 2 based on those faulty a priori restrictions are worth vector autoregression. Thus, let zt be an (Nx\) little. The techniques described in this paper are vector of variables, including both all of the en- not based on economic theory. Instead, the idea is dogenous and all of the exogenous variables in the to estimate vector autoregressions with many free model. Let zt be measured in terms of deviations parameters and to introduce restrictions not di- from means. Further, assume that Zt is a wide- rectly motivated by economic theory but rather sense stationary stochastic process3 which has = th aimed simply at forecasting better, that is, deliver- matrix covariogram Eztz't-k Cz(k). Then the M ing estimators with small mean squared errors. Because these techniques are not based on ec- onomic theory, they do not completely substitute 'These procedures have been developed and applied to mac- for structural models. They cannot appropriately roeconomic data by Christopher Sims of the University of Minnesota and Robert Litterman, now of M. I .T. but until recently an analyst in the be used to analyze the range of policy interven- Research Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. The tions that structural models were designed to eval- key references are Sims 1975, 1977; Sargent and Sims 1977; and Litter- uate. The techniques are not appropriate for con- man 1979. [Author names and years refer to the works listed at the end of this paper.] This paper is intended only as an introduction to the work ditional forecasting, for predicting the behavior of of Sims and Litterman and makes no claim for originality of any of the the system under what may be a drastic change ideas discussed. from the historical pattern in a feedback rule for a 2Good general references on the time series methods described policy variable, for example. Instead, these tech- here are Anderson 1971, Box and Jenkins 1970, Fuller 1976, Granger and Newbold 1977, and Nerlove, Grether, and Carvalho 1979. For an niques are designed mainly for unconditional fore- introduction to vector autoregressions and some of their uses in mac- casting and for compactly summarizing data. roeconomics, see Sargent 1979, chapter XL :{ Thus, users of the statistical models described in A vector stochastic process zt is said to be wide-sense stationary this paper must acknowledge from the start that if the vector of means Ez, is a constant vector independent of time t and they are vulnerable to Lucas' (1976) criticism of if the matrix covariogram Eztz's depends on only the difference (t~s) and not only t and 5 separately. Wide-sense stationarity is also referred econometric policy evaluation methods, and they to as second-order stationarity and covariance stationarity. 8 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review/Summer 1979 order vector autoregression for the zt process is the number of parameters that have to be esti- mated from (N2 x M) to a much smaller number of M theoretically more fundamental parameters of j=i which the Df's are functions. The argument is that the vector autoregression is a "profligately par- where the Df's are (NxN) matrices and the ameterized" representation7 and that estimation (Nx 1) stochastic error process rjf satisfies the or- proceeds much more efficiently by focusing on the 4 thogonality conditions structural parameters about which something is known in advance of estimation. (2) Evfzl-k = 0 k= 1,... ,M. To make this argument more precise, we use the representation of a linear econometric model Post-multiplying (1) by zl-k and using (2) gives the described by Lucas and Sargent (1979). The struc- least squares normal equations (or Yule-Walker tural equations are equations) (4) A{)yt + A xyt-x + ... + A myt —m M (3) Cz(k) - 2 Df Cz (k-j) = 0 *=1,...,A#. j = l = B(}Xt + BxXt-x + ... + BnXt-n + €f. The normal equations (3), in general, uniquely de- The random error generating equations are termine the matrices Df in terms of the population values of the second-moment matrices Cz (/:), k = (5) R{)et + + ... + Rret-r = ut R{) = /. 0,1 Under the assumptions given here, least Here yt is an (Lxl) vector of endogenous vari- squares estimates of the Df's are known to be ables, xt is a (Kx 1) vector of exogenous variables, 5 statistically consistent. But the vector autore- and e, and ut are each (Lxl) vectors of random 2 gressive system (1) has (N x M) free parameters disturbances. The matrices A} are each (LxL), the in the Df matrices, so that for even moderate sizes Bf s are (LxK), and the Rf s are each (LxL). We of M and N, least squares estimation either is assume that L + K = N. The (Lx 1) disturbance simply not feasible due to exhaustion of degrees of process ut is assumed to be serially uncorrelated freedom or else is unwise due to the large sampling with Eut = 0 and with contemporaneous covariance errors present when the number of parameters to matrix Eutui = 2 and Eutu's = 0 for t * s. be estimated nearly exhausts all degrees of free- The defining characteristic of the exogenous dom. For this reason, systems of vector autore- variables xt is that they are uncorrelated with the gressions with the sizes N and M usually encoun- es at all lags so that Eutx's is an (LxK) matrix of tered in economics have typically been estimated zeros for all t and s. The xt process is itself as- by methods other than least squares. sumed to be generated by the vector autoregres- Until recently, the most popular method of es- sion timating vector autoregressions was to apply classical simultaneous equation estimators to the (6) xt = Cx xt-x + ... + Cpxt-P + at structural model that presumably underlay the vector autoregression.6 Simultaneous equation es- timators have the virtue of permitting the model 4 builder to bring to bear a priori information of cer- These orthogonality conditions uniquely identify 2/L, Df zt~j as tain kinds to produce parameter estimates with the least squares projection of z, onto the linear vector space spanned by _i, ..., Z,-m}- smaller sampling 5For proofs, see Ljung 1976 and Anderson and Taylor 1976. errors of the Df's than can be HThe classical simultaneous equation model and estimators are produced by least squares. In statistical jargon, described in any good book on econometrics, for example, Goldberger use of this prior information produces more "effi- 1964 or Maddala 1977. cient estimators." In the present context, these 7This is Sims' terminology. techniques can be viewed as a device for reducing 9 where Eat = 0 and Eatxt~j = 0 for j ^ 1. about which economic theory has something di- As in Lucas and Sargent 1979, the reduced rectly to say. Generally, the restrictions used take form of this system is the form of sets of simple linear restrictions on the A/s, B/s, and R/s. Most often, these assume the (7) yt = -PXyt-X ~ ... ~ Pr+m Jf-r-m form simply of setting many, indeed most, of the coefficients in Aj9 Bj, and Rj to zero a priori. Q()Xt + ••• + Qr+n-Xt-n-r Another set of exclusion restrictions is evident in (6), in which lagged yf s are assumed not to appear. where The asymmetrical treatment of lagged jc's and y's 00 in (6) and (9) is what distinguishes between en- 1 Ps = A() £ Rj As-j dogenous and exogenous variables. For now, we J=-00 simply note that the exclusion of lagged y's from (8) (6) in most applications is done on an entirely a J=-oo priori basis. From the somewhat narrow viewpoint of es- In these expressions for and it is to be un- timating vector autoregressions, the virtue of using derstood that matrices not previously defined (for this body of a priori exclusion restrictions on lag- example, any with negative subscripts) are zero.
Recommended publications
  • Recent Developments in Macro-Econometric Modeling: Theory and Applications
    econometrics Editorial Recent Developments in Macro-Econometric Modeling: Theory and Applications Gilles Dufrénot 1,*, Fredj Jawadi 2,* and Alexander Mihailov 3,* ID 1 Faculty of Economics and Management, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, 13205 Marseille, France 2 Department of Finance, University of Evry-Paris Saclay, 2 rue du Facteur Cheval, 91025 Évry, France 3 Department of Economics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AA, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (G.D.); [email protected] (F.J.); [email protected] (A.M.) Received: 6 February 2018; Accepted: 2 May 2018; Published: 14 May 2018 Developments in macro-econometrics have been evolving since the aftermath of the Second World War. Essentially, macro-econometrics benefited from the development of mathematical, statistical, and econometric tools. Such a research programme has attained a meaningful success as the methods of macro-econometrics have been used widely over about half a century now to check the implications of economic theories, to model macroeconomic relationships, to forecast business cycles, and to help policymakers to make appropriate decisions. However, despite this progress, important methodological and interpretative questions in macro-econometrics remain (Stock 2001). Additionally, the recent global financial crisis of 2008–2009 and the subsequent deep and long economic recession signaled the end of the “great moderation” (early 1990s–2007) and suggested some limitations of the widely employed and by then dominant macro-econometric framework. One of these deficiencies was that current macroeconomic models have failed to predict this huge economic downturn, perhaps because they did not take into account indicators of contagion, systemic risk, and the financial cycle, or the inter-connectedness of asset markets, in particular housing, with the macro-economy.
    [Show full text]
  • UNEMPLOYMENT and LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION: a PANEL COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS for EUROPEAN COUNTRIES OZERKEK, Yasemin Abstract This
    Applied Econometrics and International Development Vol. 13-1 (2013) UNEMPLOYMENT AND LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION: A PANEL COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS FOR EUROPEAN COUNTRIES OZERKEK, Yasemin* Abstract This paper investigates the long-run relationship between unemployment and labor force participation and analyzes the existence of added/discouraged worker effect, which has potential impact on economic growth and development. Using panel cointegration techniques for a panel of European countries (1983-2009), the empirical results show that this long-term relation exists for only females and there is discouraged worker effect for them. Thus, female unemployment is undercount. Keywords: labor-force participation rate, unemployment rate, discouraged worker effect, panel cointegration, economic development JEL Codes: J20, J60, O15, O52 1. Introduction The link between labor force participation and unemployment has long been a key concern in the literature. There is general agreement that unemployment tends to cause workers to leave the labor force (Schwietzer and Smith, 1974). A discouraged worker is one who stopped actively searching for jobs because he does not think he can find work. Discouraged workers are out of the labor force and hence are not taken into account in the calculation of unemployment rate. Since unemployment rate disguises discouraged workers, labor-force participation rate has a central role in giving clues about the employment market and the overall health of the economy.1 Murphy and Topel (1997) and Gustavsson and Österholm (2006) mention that discouraged workers, who have withdrawn from labor force for market-driven reasons, can considerably affect the informational value of the unemployment rate as a macroeconomic indicator. The relationship between unemployment and labor-force participation is an important concern in the fields of labor economics and development economics as well.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Econometrics?
    Robert D. Coleman, PhD © 2006 [email protected] What Is Econometrics? Econometrics means the measure of things in economics such as economies, economic systems, markets, and so forth. Likewise, there is biometrics, sociometrics, anthropometrics, psychometrics and similar sciences devoted to the theory and practice of measure in a particular field of study. Here is how others describe econometrics. Gujarati (1988), Introduction, Section 1, What Is Econometrics?, page 1, says: Literally interpreted, econometrics means “economic measurement.” Although measurement is an important part of econometrics, the scope of econometrics is much broader, as can be seen from the following quotations. Econometrics, the result of a certain outlook on the role of economics, consists of the application of mathematical statistics to economic data to lend empirical support to the models constructed by mathematical economics and to obtain numerical results. ~~ Gerhard Tintner, Methodology of Mathematical Economics and Econometrics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1968, page 74. Econometrics may be defined as the quantitative analysis of actual economic phenomena based on the concurrent development of theory and observation, related by appropriate methods of inference. ~~ P. A. Samuelson, T. C. Koopmans, and J. R. N. Stone, “Report of the Evaluative Committee for Econometrica,” Econometrica, vol. 22, no. 2, April 1954, pages 141-146. Econometrics may be defined as the social science in which the tools of economic theory, mathematics, and statistical inference are applied to the analysis of economic phenomena. ~~ Arthur S. Goldberger, Econometric Theory, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1964, page 1. 1 Robert D. Coleman, PhD © 2006 [email protected] Econometrics is concerned with the empirical determination of economic laws.
    [Show full text]
  • An Econometric Examination of the Trend Unemployment Rate in Canada
    Working Paper 96-7 / Document de travail 96-7 An Econometric Examination of the Trend Unemployment Rate in Canada by Denise Côté and Doug Hostland Bank of Canada Banque du Canada May 1996 AN ECONOMETRIC EXAMINATION OF THE TREND UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IN CANADA by Denise Côté and Doug Hostland Research Department E-mail: [email protected] Hostland.Douglas@fin.gc.ca This paper is intended to make the results of Bank research available in preliminary form to other economists to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision. The views expressed are those of the authors. No responsibility for them should be attributed to the Bank of Canada. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Pierre Duguay, Irene Ip, Paul Jenkins, David Longworth, Tiff Macklem, Brian O’Reilly, Ron Parker, David Rose and Steve Poloz for many helpful comments and suggestions, and Sébastien Sherman for his assistance in preparing the graphs. We would also like to thank the participants of a joint Research Department/UQAM Macro-Labour Workshop for their comments and Helen Meubus for her editorial suggestions. ISSN 1192-5434 ISBN 0-662-24596-2 Printed in Canada on recycled paper iii ABSTRACT This paper attempts to identify the trend unemployment rate, an empirical concept, using cointegration theory. The authors examine whether there is a cointegrating relationship between the observed unemployment rate and various structural factors, focussing neither on the non-accelerating-inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU) nor on the natural rate of unemployment, but rather on the trend unemployment rate, which they define in terms of cointegration. They show that, given the non stationary nature of the data, cointegration represents a necessary condition for analysing the NAIRU and the natural rate but not a sufficient condition for defining them.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Cointegration of Nonlinear Time Series with an Application to Interest Rate Dynamics
    Finance and Economics Discussion Series Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C. Linear Cointegration of Nonlinear Time Series with an Application to Interest Rate Dynamics Barry E. Jones and Travis D. Nesmith 2007-03 NOTE: Staff working papers in the Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS) are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analysis and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not indicate concurrence by other members of the research staff or the Board of Governors. References in publications to the Finance and Economics Discussion Series (other than acknowledgement) should be cleared with the author(s) to protect the tentative character of these papers. Linear Cointegration of Nonlinear Time Series with an Application to Interest Rate Dynamics Barry E. Jones Binghamton University Travis D. Nesmith Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System November 29, 2006 Abstract We derive a denition of linear cointegration for nonlinear stochastic processes using a martingale representation theorem. The result shows that stationary linear cointegrations can exhibit nonlinear dynamics, in contrast with the normal assump- tion of linearity. We propose a sequential nonparametric method to test rst for cointegration and second for nonlinear dynamics in the cointegrated system. We apply this method to weekly US interest rates constructed using a multirate lter rather than averaging. The Treasury Bill, Commercial Paper and Federal Funds rates are cointegrated, with two cointegrating vectors. Both cointegrations behave nonlinearly. Consequently, linear models will not fully replicate the dynamics of monetary policy transmission. JEL Classication: C14; C32; C51; C82; E4 Keywords: cointegration; nonlinearity; interest rates; nonparametric estimation Corresponding author: 20th and C Sts., NW, Mail Stop 188, Washington, DC 20551 E-mail: [email protected] Melvin Hinich provided technical advice on his bispectrum computer program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ends of Four Big Inflations
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Inflation: Causes and Effects Volume Author/Editor: Robert E. Hall Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-31323-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/hall82-1 Publication Date: 1982 Chapter Title: The Ends of Four Big Inflations Chapter Author: Thomas J. Sargent Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11452 Chapter pages in book: (p. 41 - 98) The Ends of Four Big Inflations Thomas J. Sargent 2.1 Introduction Since the middle 1960s, many Western economies have experienced persistent and growing rates of inflation. Some prominent economists and statesmen have become convinced that this inflation has a stubborn, self-sustaining momentum and that either it simply is not susceptible to cure by conventional measures of monetary and fiscal restraint or, in terms of the consequent widespread and sustained unemployment, the cost of eradicating inflation by monetary and fiscal measures would be prohibitively high. It is often claimed that there is an underlying rate of inflation which responds slowly, if at all, to restrictive monetary and fiscal measures.1 Evidently, this underlying rate of inflation is the rate of inflation that firms and workers have come to expect will prevail in the future. There is momentum in this process because firms and workers supposedly form their expectations by extrapolating past rates of inflation into the future. If this is true, the years from the middle 1960s to the early 1980s have left firms and workers with a legacy of high expected rates of inflation which promise to respond only slowly, if at all, to restrictive monetary and fiscal policy actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity Models and Panel Econometrics” 21 – 25 September 2020
    World Trade Institute, University of Bern “Gravity Models and Panel Econometrics” 21 – 25 September 2020 Course Goals and content Course Content Grading The objective of this course is to serve as a A Trade Theory and the Gravity-Model Class participation (20 %); take-home exam practical guide for trade policy analysis with (80 %). Participants taking this course for 1. The Anderson and van Wincoop and the gravity model offering a balanced credit must attend all lectures and complete the Krugman Model approach between trade theory and econ- the take home exam. 2. The Eaton and Kortum Model metrics. We will discuss recent developments 3 Trade with Heterogeneous Firms in the economic foundation of gravity models 4. Zero Trade and the Helpman-Melitz- and describe best practices for quantifying the Rubinstein Model Organization general equilibrium impact of changes in trade 5. Measuring the Gains from Trade barriers and, especially, trade policies. The course is intended for PhD students. A 6. Universal Gravity limited number of people with relevant The course is organized in three modules. professional or academic interest may be also Module A concentrates on recent contri- B The Econometrics of Gravity Models of admitted. butions from trade theory that motivate Trade gravity models and form the basis of policy Lecture hours: 24 ECTS : 4 trade policy analysis. The second module will 1. Estimation of Linear High-dimensional take a closer look at the econometric issues of Fixed Effects models the estimation of gravity models and of 2. The Incidental Parameter Problem Timetable and Registration performing policy simulations. Starting point is 3.
    [Show full text]
  • An Econometric Model of the Yield Curve with Macroeconomic Jump Effects
    An Econometric Model of the Yield Curve with Macroeconomic Jump Effects Monika Piazzesi∗ UCLA and NBER First Draft: October 15, 1999 This Draft: April 10, 2001 Abstract This paper develops an arbitrage-free time-series model of yields in continuous time that incorporates central bank policy. Policy-related events, such as FOMC meetings and releases of macroeconomic news the Fed cares about, are modeled as jumps. The model introduces a class of linear-quadratic jump-diffusions as state variables, which allows for a wide variety of jump types but still leads to tractable solutions for bond prices. I estimate a version of this model with U.S. interest rates, the Federal Reserve's target rate, and key macroeconomic aggregates. The estimated model improves bond pricing, especially at short maturities. The \snake-shape" of the volatility curve is linked to monetary policy inertia. A new monetary policy shock series is obtained by assuming that the Fed reacts to information available right before the FOMC meeting. According to the estimated policy rule, the Fed is mainly reacting to information contained in the yield-curve. Surprises in analyst forecasts turn out to be merely temporary components of macro variables, so that the \hump-shaped" yield response to these surprises is not consistent with a Taylor-type policy rule. ∗I am still looking for words that express my gratitude to Darrell Duffie. I would like to thank Andrew Ang, Michael Brandt, John Cochrane, Heber Farnsworth, Silverio Foresi, Lars Hansen, Ken Judd, Thomas Sargent, Ken Singleton, John Shoven, John Taylor, and Harald Uhlig for helpful suggestions; and Martin Schneider for extensive discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Econometric Theory
    ECONOMETRIC THEORY MODULE – I Lecture - 1 Introduction to Econometrics Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur 2 Econometrics deals with the measurement of economic relationships. It is an integration of economic theories, mathematical economics and statistics with an objective to provide numerical values to the parameters of economic relationships. The relationships of economic theories are usually expressed in mathematical forms and combined with empirical economics. The econometrics methods are used to obtain the values of parameters which are essentially the coefficients of mathematical form of the economic relationships. The statistical methods which help in explaining the economic phenomenon are adapted as econometric methods. The econometric relationships depict the random behaviour of economic relationships which are generally not considered in economics and mathematical formulations. It may be pointed out that the econometric methods can be used in other areas like engineering sciences, biological sciences, medical sciences, geosciences, agricultural sciences etc. In simple words, whenever there is a need of finding the stochastic relationship in mathematical format, the econometric methods and tools help. The econometric tools are helpful in explaining the relationships among variables. 3 Econometric models A model is a simplified representation of a real world process. It should be representative in the sense that it should contain the salient features of the phenomena under study. In general, one of the objectives in modeling is to have a simple model to explain a complex phenomenon. Such an objective may sometimes lead to oversimplified model and sometimes the assumptions made are unrealistic. In practice, generally all the variables which the experimenter thinks are relevant to explain the phenomenon are included in the model.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Structural Vector Autoregression
    Chapter 5. Structural Vector Autoregression Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The structural moving average model 1 2.1 The impulse response function . 2 2.2 Variance decomposition . 3 3 The structural VAR representation 4 3.1 Connection between VAR and VMA . 5 3.2 The invertibility requirement . 5 4 Identi…cation of the structural VAR 8 4.1 The order condition . 9 4.2 What shouldn’tbe done . 9 4.3 A common normalization that provides n(n - 1)/2 restrictions . 11 4.4 Identi…cation through short run restrictions . 11 4.5 Identi…cation through long run restrictions . 12 5 Estimation and inference 13 5.1 Estimating exactly identi…ed models . 13 5.2 Estimating overly identi…ed models . 13 5.3 Inference . 14 6 Structural VAR versus fully speci…ed economic models 14 1. Introduction Following the work of Sims (1980), vector autoregressions have been extensively used by economists for data description, forecasting and structural inference. The discussion here focuses on structural inference. The key idea, as put forward by Sims (1980), is to estimate a model with minimal parametric restrictions and then subsequently test economic hypothesis based on such a model. This idea has attracted a great deal of attention since it promises to deliver an alternative framework to testing economic theory without relying on elaborately parametrized dynamic general equilibrium models. The material in this chapter is based on Watson (1994) and Fernandez-Villaverde, Rubio-Ramirez, Sargent and Watson (2007). We begin the discussion by introducing the structural moving average model, and show that this model provides answers to the “impulse” and “propagation” questions often asked by macroeconomists.
    [Show full text]
  • An Econometric Model of International Growth Dynamics for Long-Horizon Forecasting
    An Econometric Model of International Growth Dynamics for Long-horizon Forecasting June 3, 2020 Ulrich K. Müller Department of Economics, Princeton University James H. Stock Department of Economics, Harvard University and the National Bureau of Economic Research and Mark W. Watson* Department of Economics and the Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University and the National Bureau of Economic Research * For helpful comments we thank participants at several seminars and in particular those at the Resources for the Future workshop on Long-Run Projections of Economic Growth and Discounting. Müller acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation grant SES-1919336. An earlier version of this paper used the title "An Econometric Model of International Growth Dynamics." Abstract We develop a Bayesian latent factor model of the joint long-run evolution of GDP per capita for 113 countries over the 118 years from 1900 to 2017. We find considerable heterogeneity in rates of convergence, including rates for some countries that are so slow that they might not converge (or diverge) in century-long samples, and a sparse correlation pattern (“convergence clubs”) between countries. The joint Bayesian structure allows us to compute a joint predictive distribution for the output paths of these countries over the next 100 years. This predictive distribution can be used for simulations requiring projections into the deep future, such as estimating the costs of climate change. The model’s pooling of information across countries results in tighter prediction intervals than are achieved using univariate information sets. Still, even using more than a century of data on many countries, the 100-year growth paths exhibit very wide uncertainty.
    [Show full text]