The Putnam Competition from 1938-2013∗
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition 1985–2000 Problems, Solutions, and Commentary
The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition 1985–2000 Problems, Solutions, and Commentary i Reproduction. The work may be reproduced by any means for educational and scientific purposes without fee or permission with the exception of reproduction by services that collect fees for delivery of documents. In any reproduction, the original publication by the Publisher must be credited in the following manner: “First published in The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition 1985–2000: Problems, Solutions, and Commen- tary, c 2002 by the Mathematical Association of America,” and the copyright notice in proper form must be placed on all copies. Ravi Vakil’s photo on p. 337 is courtesy of Gabrielle Vogel. c 2002 by The Mathematical Association of America (Incorporated) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2002107972 ISBN 0-88385-807-X Printed in the United States of America Current Printing (last digit): 10987654321 ii The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition 1985–2000 Problems, Solutions, and Commentary Kiran S. Kedlaya University of California, Berkeley Bjorn Poonen University of California, Berkeley Ravi Vakil Stanford University Published and distributed by The Mathematical Association of America iii MAA PROBLEM BOOKS SERIES Problem Books is a series of the Mathematical Association of America consisting of collections of problems and solutions from annual mathematical competitions; compilations of problems (including unsolved problems) specific to particular branches of mathematics; books on the art and practice of problem solving, etc. Committee on Publications Gerald Alexanderson, Chair Roger Nelsen Editor Irl Bivens Clayton Dodge Richard Gibbs George Gilbert Art Grainger Gerald Heuer Elgin Johnston Kiran Kedlaya Loren Larson Margaret Robinson The Inquisitive Problem Solver, Paul Vaderlind, Richard K. -
2010 Integral
Autumn 2010 Volume 5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1ntegral n e w s f r o m t h e mathematics d e p a r t m e n t a t m i t The retirement of seven of our illustrious col- leagues this year—Mike Artin, David Ben- Inside ney, Dan Kleitman, Arthur Mattuck, Is Sing- er, Dan Stroock, and Alar Toomre—marks • Faculty news 2–3 a shift to a new generation of faculty, from • Women in math 3 those who entered the field in the Sputnik era to those who never knew life without email • A minority perspective 4 and the Internet. The older generation built • Student news 4–5 the department into the academic power- house it is today—indeed they were the core • Funds for RSI and SPUR 5 of the department, its leadership and most • Retiring faculty and staff 6–7 distinguished members, during my early years at MIT. Now, as they are in the process • Alumni corner 8 of retiring, I look around and see that my con- temporaries are becoming the department’s Dear Friends, older group. Yikes! another year gone by and what a year it Other big changes are in the works. Two of Marina Chen have taken the lead in raising an was. We’re getting older, and younger, cele- our dedicated long-term administrators— endowment for them. Together with those of brating prizes and long careers, remembering Joanne Jonsson and Linda Okun—have Tim Lu ’79 and Peiti Tung ’79, their commit- our past and looking to the future. -
THE WILLIAM LOWELL PUTNAM MATHEMATICAL COMPETITION 1985–2000 Problems, Solutions, and Commentary
AMS / MAA PROBLEM BOOKS VOL 33 THE WILLIAM LOWELL PUTNAM MATHEMATICAL COMPETITION 1985–2000 Problems, Solutions, and Commentary Kiran S. Kedlaya Bjorn Poonen Ravi Vakil 10.1090/prb/033 The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition 1985-2000 Originally published by The Mathematical Association of America, 2002. ISBN: 978-1-4704-5124-0 LCCN: 2002107972 Copyright © 2002, held by the American Mathematical Society Printed in the United States of America. Reprinted by the American Mathematical Society, 2019 The American Mathematical Society retains all rights except those granted to the United States Government. ⃝1 The paper used in this book is acid-free and falls within the guidelines established to ensure permanence and durability. Visit the AMS home page at https://www.ams.org/ 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 24 23 22 21 20 19 AMS/MAA PROBLEM BOOKS VOL 33 The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition 1985-2000 Problems, Solutions, and Commentary Kiran S. Kedlaya Bjorn Poonen Ravi Vakil MAA PROBLEM BOOKS SERIES Problem Books is a series of the Mathematical Association of America consisting of collections of problems and solutions from annual mathematical competitions; compilations of problems (including unsolved problems) specific to particular branches of mathematics; books on the art and practice of problem solving, etc. Committee on Publications Gerald Alexanderson, Chair Problem Books Series Editorial Board Roger Nelsen Editor Irl Bivens Clayton Dodge Richard Gibbs George Gilbert Art Grainger Gerald Heuer Elgin Johnston Kiran Kedlaya Loren Larson Margaret Robinson The Contest Problem Book VII: American Mathematics Competitions, 1995-2000 Contests, compiled and augmented by Harold B. -
Rigid Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks
Rigid Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks by David Michael Brown A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kenneth Ribet, Chair Professor Arthur Ogus Professor Christos Papadimitriou Fall 2010 Rigid Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks Copyright 2010 by David Michael Brown 1 Abstract Rigid Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks by David Michael Brown Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Professor Kenneth Ribet, Chair We extend le Stum's construction of the overconvergent site [lS09] to algebraic stacks. We prove that ´etalemorphisms are morphisms of cohomological descent for finitely presnted crystals on the overconvergent site. Finally, using the notion of an open subtopos of [73] we define a notion of overconvergent cohomology supported in a closed substack and show that it agrees with the classical notion of rigid cohomology supported in a closed subscheme. i Contents Preface 1 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Background . .3 1.1.1 Algebraic de Rham cohomology and crystals . .3 1.1.2 Weil cohomologies . .4 1.1.3 Rigid cohomology . .4 1.2 Rigid cohomology for algebraic stacks . .5 1.2.1 Outline and statement of results: . .6 2 Definitions 7 2.1 Notations and conventions . .7 2.2 The overconvergent site . .8 2.3 Calculus on the overconvergent site and comparison with the classical theory 14 2.4 The overconvergent site for stacks . 23 3 Cohomological descent 25 3.1 Background on cohomological descent . 26 3.2 Cohomological descent for overconvergent crystals . -
Jahresbericht Annual Report 2016
Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Jahresbericht 2016 Annual Report www.mfo.de Herausgeber/Published by Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Direktor Gerhard Huisken Gesellschafter Gesellschaft für Mathematische Forschung e.V. Adresse Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH Schwarzwaldstr. 9-11 77709 Oberwolfach Germany Kontakt http://www.mfo.de [email protected] Tel: +49 (0)7834 979 0 Fax: +49 (0)7834 979 38 In diesem Bericht wurde an einigen Stellen die männliche Form lediglich aus Gründen der Vereinfachung gewählt. Dies dient der besseren Lesbarkeit. Entsprechende Begriffe gelten im Sinne der Gleichbehandlung grundsätzlich für Frauen und Männer. © Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH (2017) Jahresbericht 2016 – Annual Report 2016 Inhaltsverzeichnis/Table of Contents Vorwort des Direktors/Director’s foreword ............................................................................ 6 1. Besondere Beiträge/Special contributions 1.1. Modernisierung der Informations- und Kommunikationsinfrastruktur/ Modernisation of the information and communication infrastructure ............................... 8 1.2. Experiences of an Oberwolfach Leibniz Fellow ............................................................ 11 1.3. MiMa – Museum für Mineralien und Mathematik Oberwolfach/ MiMa – Museum for Minerals and Mathematics Oberwolfach ........................................ 13 1.4. IMAGINARY 2016 ................................................................................................... 15 1.5. -
Gabriel Carroll Curriculum Vitae Updated April 21, 2021 Department
Gabriel Carroll Curriculum Vitae Updated April 21, 2021 Department of Economics, University of Toronto Max Gluskin House, 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G7, Canada http://individual.utoronto.ca/carroll j [email protected] Personal Information Birthdate: December 24, 1982 Citizenship: USA Education PhD in Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012 Doctoral thesis: \Approaches to Mechanism Design with Boundedly Rational Agents" Advisors: Parag Pathak, Daron Acemoglu, Glenn Ellison BA in Mathematics and Linguistics, summa cum laude, Harvard College, 2005 Employment Associate professor (tenured) in Department of Economics, University of Toronto, January 2021 { present Associate professor (tenured) in Department of Economics, Stanford University, July 2020 { December 2020 Assistant professor in Department of Economics, Stanford University, July 2013 { June 2020 Post-doctoral researcher at Microsoft Research, July 2012 { June 2013 Instructor at Mathematical Olympiad Summer Program, Summer 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012 Research assistant for James Choi, David Laibson, and Brigitte Madrian at NBER, August 2006 { July 2007 Volunteer English teacher at Chaling #1 Middle School, Chaling, Hunan, China, August 2005 { July 2006 Visiting Positions (one month or more) Visitor at Research School of Economics, Australian National University, March { May 2018; 1 March { May 2019 Visitor at Cowles Foundation, Yale University, February { March 2018 Part-time visiting scholar at Simons Institute, UC Berkeley, August { December -
Explicit Methods in Number Theory
Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 32/2015 DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2015/32 Explicit Methods in Number Theory Organised by Karim Belabas, Talence Bjorn Poonen, Cambridge MA Fernando Rodriguez Villegas, Trieste 5 July – 11 July 2015 Abstract. The aim of the series of Oberwolfach meetings on ‘Explicit meth- ods in number theory’ is to bring together people attacking key problems in number theory via techniques involving concrete or computable descriptions. Here, number theory is interpreted broadly, including algebraic and ana- lytic number theory, Galois theory and inverse Galois problems, arithmetic of curves and higher-dimensional varieties, zeta and L-functions and their special values, and modular forms and functions. Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 11xx, 12xx, 13xx, 14xx. Introduction by the Organisers The workshop Explicit Methods in Number Theory was organised by Karim Be- labas (Talence), Bjorn Poonen (Cambridge MA), and Fernando Rodriguez-Villegas (Trieste), and it took place July 5–11, 2015. Eight previous workshops on the topic had been held, every two years since 1999. The goal of the meeting was to present new methods and results on concrete aspects of number theory. In several cases, this included algorithmic and experimental work, but the emphasis was on the implications for number theory. There was one ‘mini-series’ of five expository talks by Andrew Granville and Andrew Sutherland on the breakthrough results on small gaps between primes obtained by Zhang, Maynard and the ensuing two Polymath projects. Some other themes were: Arakelov class groups, • L-functions, • 1810 Oberwolfach Report 32/2015 rational points, • heuristics and theorems about the proportion of curves satisfying various • arithmetic condition. -
Maa Amc 10/12
AMC 10 2010 61st Annual MAA • AMC 10/12 AMC 12 Summary of Results and Awards Learning Mathematics Through Selective Problem Solving amc.maa.org Examinations prepared by a subcommittee of the American Mathematics Competitions and administered by the office of the Director ©2010 The Mathematical Association of America The American Mathematics Competitions are sponsored by The Mathematical Association of America and The Akamai Foundation Contributors: Academy of Applied Sciences American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges American Mathematical Society American Statistical Association Art of Problem Solving Awesome Math Canada/USA Mathcamp Casualty Actuarial Society D.E. Shaw & Company IDEA Math Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Math Zoom Academy Mu Alpha Theta National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Pi Mu Epsilon Society of Actuaries U.S.A. Math Talent Search W. H. Freeman and Company Wolfram Research Inc. TAble of Contents Report of the Director....................................................................................................5 I..Introduction...........................................................................................................5 II..2010.Enrollment.Analysis.and.Statistical.Results...........................................5 III..International.Participation...............................................................................5 IV..2011.Contest.Dates,.Registration.and.Fees.....................................................5 Table I: 2010 AMC 12 Enrollment -
2014 Annual Report
CLAY MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE www.claymath.org ANNUAL REPORT 2014 1 2 CMI ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CLAY MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Nicholas Woodhouse, President 2 contents ANNUAL MEETING Clay Research Conference 3 The Schanuel Paradigm 3 Chinese Dragons and Mating Trees 4 Steenrod Squares and Symplectic Fixed Points 4 Higher Order Fourier Analysis and Applications 5 Clay Research Conference Workshops 6 Advances in Probability: Integrability, Universality and Beyond 6 Analytic Number Theory 7 Functional Transcendence around Ax–Schanuel 8 Symplectic Topology 9 RECOGNIZING ACHIEVEMENT Clay Research Award 10 Highlights of Peter Scholze’s contributions by Michael Rapoport 11 PROFILE Interview with Ivan Corwin, Clay Research Fellow 14 PROGRAM OVERVIEW Summary of 2014 Research Activities 16 Clay Research Fellows 17 CMI Workshops 18 Geometry and Fluids 18 Extremal and Probabilistic Combinatorics 19 CMI Summer School 20 Periods and Motives: Feynman Amplitudes in the 21st Century 20 LMS/CMI Research Schools 23 Automorphic Forms and Related Topics 23 An Invitation to Geometry and Topology via G2 24 Algebraic Lie Theory and Representation Theory 24 Bounded Gaps between Primes 25 Enhancement and Partnership 26 PUBLICATIONS Selected Articles by Research Fellows 29 Books 30 Digital Library 35 NOMINATIONS, PROPOSALS AND APPLICATIONS 36 ACTIVITIES 2015 Institute Calendar 38 1 ach year, the CMI appoints two or three Clay Research Fellows. All are recent PhDs, and Emost are selected as they complete their theses. Their fellowships provide a gener- ous stipend, research funds, and the freedom to carry on research for up to five years anywhere in the world and without the distraction of teaching and administrative duties. -
USA and International Mathematical
AMS / MAA PROBLEM BOOKS VOL AMS / MAA PROBLEM BOOKS VOL 12 12 USA and International Mathematical USA and International Mathematical Olympiads 2002 The Mathematical Olympiad examinations, covering the USA Mathematical Olympiad (USAMO) and the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), have been published annually by the MAA American Mathematics Competitions since 1976. This is the third volume in that series published by the MAA in its Problem Book series. The IMO is the world mathematics championship for high school students. It takes place every year in a different country. The IMO competitions help to discover, challenge, and encourage mathematically gifted young people all over the world. The USAMO and the Team Selection Test (TST) are the last two stages of the selection process leading to selection of the US team in the IMO. The preceding examinations are the AMC IO or AMC 12 and the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME). Participation in the AIME, USAMO, and the TST is by invitation only, based on performance in the preceding exams of the sequence. USA and International Mathematical Olympiads 2002 has been prepared by Titu Andreescu, team leader of the USA IMO team and chairman of the USAMO committee, and Zuming Feng, deputy leader of the USA IMO team. In addition to presenting their own carefully written solutions to the problems, the editors have provided remarkable solutions developed by the examination committees, contestants, and experts, during or after the contests. They also provide a comprehensive guide to other materials on advanced problem-solving. This collection of excellent problems and beautiful solutions is a valuable companion for students who wish to develop their interest in mathematics outside the school curriculum and to deepen their knowl- Edited by Titu Andreescu edge of mathematics. -
The Putnam Competition from 1938-2012∗
The Putnam Competition from 1938-2012∗ Joseph A. Gallian 1. INTRODUCTION. The William Lowell Putnam Competition is held annually for the top un- dergraduate mathematics students in the United States and Canada. The first Putnam competition took place in 1938, but its genesis was a math competition held in 1933 between ten Harvard students and ten students from the United States Military Academy at West Point [2]. That competition was sponsored by Elizabeth Lowell Putnam in honor of her late husband William Lowell Putnam, who was a member of the Harvard class of 1882. That competition went so well that plans were made to have an annual competition in which all interested institutions could participate. This came about in 1938, when the first official Putnam competition was sponsored by the Mathematical Association of America. The examination was prepared and graded by members of the Harvard mathematics department and Harvard students were excluded the first year. There were both individual and team competitions. The questions were drawn from calculus, the theory of equations, differential equations, and geometry. (The problems are included at the end of this article.) Prizes in the first few years were $500, $300, and $200 for the top three teams and $50 each for the top five ranking individuals, who were designated as Putnam Fellows. By the year 1997 the prizes for the top five teams were $25,000, $20,000, $15,000, $10,000, and $5,000, while Putnam Fellows received $2,500 each. Moreover, each year one Putnam Fellow receives the William Lowell Putnam Fellowship for graduate study at Harvard. -
Titans of Mathematics Clash Over Epic Proof of ABC Conjecture
Quanta Magazine Titans of Mathematics Clash Over Epic Proof of ABC Conjecture Two mathematicians have found what they say is a hole at the heart of a proof that has convulsed the mathematics community for nearly six years. By Erica Klarreich In a report posted online today, Peter Scholze of the University of Bonn and Jakob Stix of Goethe University Frankfurt describe what Stix calls a “serious, unfixable gap” within a mammoth series of papers by Shinichi Mochizuki, a mathematician at Kyoto University who is renowned for his brilliance. Posted online in 2012, Mochizuki’s papers supposedly prove the abc conjecture, one of the most far-reaching problems in number theory. Despite multiple conferences dedicated to explicating Mochizuki’s proof, number theorists have struggled to come to grips with its underlying ideas. His series of papers, which total more than 500 pages, are written in an impenetrable style, and refer back to a further 500 pages or so of previous work by Mochizuki, creating what one mathematician, Brian Conrad of Stanford University, has called “a sense of infinite regress.” Between 12 and 18 mathematicians who have studied the proof in depth believe it is correct, wrote Ivan Fesenko of the University of Nottingham in an email. But only mathematicians in “Mochizuki’s orbit” have vouched for the proof’s correctness, Conrad commented in a blog discussion last December. “There is nobody else out there who has been willing to say even off the record that they are confident the proof is complete.” Nevertheless, wrote Frank Calegari of the University of Chicago in a December blog post, “mathematicians are very loath to claim that there is a problem with Mochizuki’s argument because they can’t point to any definitive error.” That has now changed.