CIES Football Observatory Monthly Report n°39 - November 2018

Ten years of demographic analysis of the football players’ labour market in Europe

Drs Raffaele Poli, Loïc Ravenel and Roger Besson

1. Introduction

The long-term work carried out within the CIES Football Observatory focuses, in particular, on the demographic analysis of the football play- ers’ labour market. It is with pride that we are able to provide an overview of the principle changes observed over the past decade. The study covers three areas: training (club- trained players), migration (expatriate foot- ballers) and mobility (players having changed team during the year). The sample is made up of teams having participated in 31 top division leagues of UEFA member associations between 2009 and 2018. Figure 1: study sample and geographical areas

To be included, a player had to be present on North fin the 1st of October in the first team squad of nor se the clubs analysed. Moreover, he must have al- so ready played in domestic league games during en rs en the current season or, this being not the case, ne Centre blr West bel er to have played matches in adult champion- pol e r sv ships during each of the two preceding seasons ra s at hn svn (B-teams not included). The second and third ro rom por srb East goalkeepers have been taken into account in esp ta bl

all cases. tr

re South C sr

North rs remer eae en Sperla r remer eae

easla South nor Elteseren yp 1 vson se llsvensan esp a a

Centre re Sper eae at nesla por rmera a ro 1 N sr at hal e Ceh a ta Sere hn N I tr Sper

pol Estralasa West srb Sper a bel Frst vson sv Sper a en remer eae svn 1 SN ra e 1

East er nesla blr remer eae ne Erevse bl Frst eae so remershp rom a I s Sper eae

1 Monthly Report 39 - Ten years of demographic analysis of the football in Europe

2. Training Figure 2: % of club-trained players by geographical zone

In accordance with the UEFA definition, club- 31 European top divisions trained players are those having spent at least three seasons between 15 and 21 years of age 232 231 223 21 21 210 200 193 in the employer team. The proportion of this 18 19 category of footballers has never been as low as on the 1st of October 2018: 16.9% (-6.3% in ten years). The decrease observed during the last year has been the greatest ever recorded 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018 (-1.6%). The average annual drop has increased Northern Europe

from 0.37% between 2009 and 2013 to 1.02% 32 338 33 30 31 302 between 2014 and 2018. 2 20 23 219 A decrease was observed all over the continent. Northern and Central Europe remain the zones with the highest proportion of club-trained footballers. However, a sharp decline was also 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018 observed since 2009: -8.8% and -8.4% respec- tively. In all areas, the values measured in 2018 Central Europe are the lowest ever recorded. Southern Europe 29 291 300 290 28 2 20 21 has the lowest overall value (12.8%). 22 20

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Eastern Europe

228 22 220 199 203 19 19 19 1 1

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Southern Europe

1 19 19 18 19 19 12 139 13 128

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Western Europe

210 21 20 19 208 199 19 1 13 1

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

2 Monthly Report 39 - Ten years of demographic analysis of the football in Europe

Different processes explain the decrease ob- Figure 3: % of club-trained players by league served. An increasing proportion of clubs do not give as much importance to the presence 01102018 20092018 Evol of players from their youth settings in the first ISR at hal 28.0 318  team squad. Moreover, the less well-off clubs SVN 1 SN 27.5 313 

have ever greater difficulties to hold onto their SVK Sper a 26.8 3  best players, who tend to converge more and CZE Ceh a 25.8 298  more quickly on the wealthiest clubs. FIN easla 25.8 309 

The proportion of players trained by the 100 SUI Sper eae 24.5 22  most productive training clubs has gone from NOR Elteseren 23.6 29  21.8% in 2009 to 26.4% in 2018. The percentage  of footballers still in the training period playing BLR remer eae 22.2 2 for a club that did not train them has increased DEN Sperla 21.7 291  from 40.5% in 2009 to 53.9% in 2018. These AUT nesla 21.6 23 

changes reflect the precocious concentration UKR remer eae 21.5 22  of talents within a select group of dominant NED Erevse 19.4 22  clubs in a strongly speculative context in which many players who have been transferred early HUN N I 19.4 22  move again quickly to other horizons. FRA e 1 18.8 22  SRB Sper a 18.0 221  On the 1st of October 2018, the extreme val-  ues for club-trained players by league were ESP a a 17.8 230 observed in Israel (28.0%) and Italy (7.4%). In SWE llsvensan 17.3 28  30 championships out of 31, the level recorded SCO remershp 17.0 2 

in 2018 was lower than the average measured CRO 1 N 15.4 311  over the past decade. The greatest negative GER nesla 15.0 11  gaps were observed for Croatia (-15.7%), Swe- den (-11.2%) and Slovakia (-8.6%). ROM a I 14.2 11  POL Estralasa 13.5 1 

RUS remer eae 13.0 138 

CYP 1 vson 12.7 12 

BUL Frst eae 12.6 18 

GRE Sper eae 12.6 133 

ENG remer eae 11.0 13 

TUR Sper 8.6 88 

BEL Frst vson 8.4 139 

POR rmera a 7.7 99 

ITA Sere 7.4 90 

3 Monthly Report 39 - Ten years of demographic analysis of the football in Europe

3. Migration Figure 4: % of expatriates by geographical zone

31 European top divisions The study of migration is carried out using the concept of expatriate. This notion defines play- 38 39 1 ers having grown up outside of the national 3 38 3 33 39 38 3 association of their employer club and having gone abroad for football-related reasons. This definition has the advantage of isolating migra- tions directly linked to the practice of football. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Indeed, the foreign players having grown up in Northern Europe the association of their employer team are not considered as expatriates. 312 320 31 During the last decade, the proportion of ex- 2 2 2 28 22 2 300 patriates in the leagues studied has increased from 34.7% to a level of 41.5% in 2018. An acceleration of the process of internation- 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018 alisation of squads has been observed. We went from an annual growth of 0.55% between Central Europe 2009 and 2013 to an average increase of 1.17% between 2014 and 2018. The proportion of ex- 29 328 2 29 2 281 patriates increased in all the zones analysed. 209 220 20 23 The latter are particularly numerous in South- ern (51.8%) and Western Europe (48.9%).

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Eastern Europe

31 313 32 320 321 28 292 282 23 28

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Southern Europe

1 18 9 8 88 0 2 9

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Western Europe

1 89 8 22 2 2 2

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

4 Monthly Report 39 - Ten years of demographic analysis of the football in Europe

The rise in the proportion of expatriates is es- Figure 5: % of expatriates by league sentially linked to the migrations of players from UEFA member countries. In absolute 01102018 20092018 Evol terms, their number has increased by 736 in- CYP 1 vson 66.2 81  dividuals between 2009 and 2018. During the ENG remer eae 62.7 90 

same period, the number of footballers coming BEL Frst vson 62.5 2  from countries outside of UEFA has fallen by TUR Sper 61.9 1  61. The proportion of Europeans abroad among  the total number of expatriates has thus gone POR rmera a 61.3 8 from 58.5% to 65.5%. ITA Sere 56.5 2  SCO remershp 51.8 0  The values by league vary between 66.2% in  Cyprus and 16.3% in Serbia. In 26 of 31 cham- GER nesla 50.8 2 pionships studied, the percentage measured GRE Sper eae 50.4  in 2018 was superior to the average for the SVK Sper a 42.3 281 

decade. The biggest increases were for Croatia CRO 1 N 42.1 229  (+19.2%), Slovakia (14.2%), Bulgaria (+10.9%) and POL Estralasa 40.1 32  Slovenia (+10.0%). On the 1st of October 2018, expatriates accounted for more than half of HUN N I 39.5 322  the squads in a record number of nine cham- SUI Sper eae 39.3 391  pionships, including three from the big-5 (Eng- ESP a a 38.6 381 

land, Italy and Germany). DEN Sperla 38.2 30  The evolution in the percentage of players RUS remer eae 38.1 29  having already migrated over the course of FRA e 1 36.9 312 

their career also allows us to account for the BUL Frst eae 36.6 2  process of the internationalisation of the foot- ROM a I 36.5 310  ball players’ labour market. The proportion of footballers in this situation has increased SVN 1 SN 36.1 21  from 46.4% in 2009 to a record level of 56.9% NED Erevse 34.9 33  in 2018. In a decade, the average age of the FIN easla 32.2 2 

first migration has decreased from 22.2 to 21.8 NOR Elteseren 29.9 31  years. The percentage of players having left AUT nesla 28.6 23  as minors among those who migrated during their career has also increased from 8.2% to BLR remer eae 27.9 22  9.6%. SWE llsvensan 27.3 21  CZE Ceh a 25.3 22 

ISR at hal 23.5 229 

UKR remer eae 19.2 281 

SRB Sper a 16.3 13 

5 Monthly Report 39 - Ten years of demographic analysis of the football in Europe

4. Mobility Figure 6: % of players recruited during the year by geographical zone

The percentage of players recruited during the 31 European top divisions year in clubs’ squads is a good indicator to 3 0 measure mobility in the labour market. Foot- 0 0 18 20 21 3 381 ballers coming directly from youth academies are not considered as new recruits. In 2018, the percentage of players having joined their employer club during the year was 44.4%. This is a lower value than for 2017 (-0.6%), but well 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018 above the overall percentage for the last dec- Northern Europe ade (+2.9%).

In Eastern and Southern Europe, on the 1st 33 30 32 38 29 31 32 292 323 October 2018, half of squad members were 2 not present a year previously. This proportion is considerably lower in Western and Northern Europe. Nevertheless, since 2009, an increase 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018 has been recorded in all geographical zones: between +4.8% in Southern Europe and +11.0% Central Europe in Eastern Europe. A fall in mobility growth rate 28 39 9 8 12 391 1 was observed over the last five years (+0.60% 33 3 on average per year) in comparison with the five preceding ones (+1.27%).

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Eastern Europe

90 09 8 82 399 20

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Southern Europe

8 90 00 0 88 0 0 1

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

Western Europe

38 31 32 382 38 393 38 31 31 3

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201 201 201 201 2018

6 Monthly Report 39 - Ten years of demographic analysis of the football in Europe

In 27 championships out of 31, the percentage Figure 7: % of players recruited during the year of new recruits in 2018 was greater than the by league average measured over the last decade. The 01102018 20092018 Evol volume of transfers has increased particularly in Croatia (+16.4%) and Ukraine (+10.7%). Tur- CYP 1 vson 60.4 9  key and England are the only two countries CRO 1 N 59.4 30  where the proportion of players signed over ROM a I 56.3 02 

the course of the year in 2018 was lower than BLR remer eae 54.0  that measured during the first census in 2009. GRE Sper eae 53.9 92 

On the 1st October 2018, the proportion of new POR rmera a 52.4 21 

recruits was at least half in a record number of SRB Sper a 51.8 11  eleven championships. Over the whole period, BUL Frst eae 51.1 12  the lowest value was measured for the Danish top division (29.9%). In 2018, the most stable UKR remer eae 50.8 01  teams were to be found in Germany (32.1% of SCO remershp 50.5 0  players recruited during the year) and England ISR at hal 50.0 

(32.9%). With the exception of , all the ITA Sere 47.0  big-5 leagues are among those whose clubs Frst vson  change players the least. BEL 45.7 12 FIN easla 43.5 38 

In an economic context of strong polarisation, TUR Sper 43.2 81  stability is becoming a luxury that few clubs RUS remer eae 42.6 22  (and players) can afford. As a result, it is not surprising to find that wealthy clubs are at the CZE Ceh a 42.6 00  top of the rankings of teams with the least SVK Sper a 42.3 39  amount of different players listed during the POL Estralasa 41.4 0 

last decade: Bayern Munich (76 players), Real SVN 1 SN 41.0 0  Madrid (76) and Barcelona (79). With 178 differ-  ent players, the Croatian side NK Istra has the ESP a a 40.2 38 highest figure among clubs present through- HUN N I 40.1 02  out in our sample. NED Erevse 40.0 3 

SWE llsvensan 38.7 30 

NOR Elteseren 38.0 33 

FRA e 1 37.9 33 

AUT nesla 36.9 339 

SUI Sper eae 36.2 39 

DEN Sperla 34.3 299 

ENG remer eae 32.9 3 

GER nesla 32.1 318 

7 Monthly Report 39 - Ten years of demographic analysis of the football in Europe

5. Conclusion

The surveys carried out by the CIES Foot- ball Observatory allow us to reveal very clear trends. The footballers’ labour market in Europe is becoming deterritorialised by a decreasing presence of club-trained players, a stronger proportion of expatriate footballers and great- er mobility. These processes can be seen as problematic from the point of view of the role that clubs are supposed to undertake in their local environment. More and more teams are geared towards the short-term. In an increasingly segmented and speculative context, owners and executives tend to optimise financial returns on the trans- fer market to the detriment of more eminently sporting considerations. An increasing number of players consider their team as a mere step- ping-stone to more lucrative markets. Agents and the entourage also play a decisive role in this regard. The increasing instability that re- sults limits the sporting competitiveness of an ever greater number of teams, to the advantage of the wealthiest and better structured clubs, who increasingly dominate the proceedings.

8