Fletcher's Habits of Dramatic Collaboration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fletcher's Habits of Dramatic Collaboration FLETCHER'S HABITS OF DRAMATIC COLLABORATION. In an extremely interesting and suggestive article entitled Elizabethan Dramatic Collaboration, Mr. E. N. S. Thompson (Englische Studien, 40. band, 1. heft, 1908) proposes certain methods of literary partnership which he thinks Fletcher followed in collaborating with Beaumont, and others slightly different used by him in writing later with Massinger.1) His plan, äs announced, is to begin with plays which critics agree are either by Fletcher and Beaumont alone, or by Fletcher and Massinger alone, and in which there is also critical agreement äs to the part taken by each of the two collaborators in the composition of the plays.2) He then seeks for the motives prompting the dramatists in dividing the work, and the habits of collaboration to which they led, and arrives at the following conclusions: — (1) As to the Fletcher-Beaumont plays — "According to the terms of the partnership, Fletcher was usually exempt from the responsibilities of the first act (He notes three exceptions here). But in the majority of plays attributable to Beaumont and Fletcher alone, Fletcher's band is not apparent until the play is well advanced" (p. 36). !) He suggests also the division of labour made in the Middleton- Rowley collahoration, but this article is concerned only with that part relating to Fletcher. a) " What Fleay, Boyle, Oliphant, Macaulay and Miss Wiggin (for the Middleton-Rowley plays) have done in this way we shall not amplify or review. Instead, accepting the conclusions on which they agree and to which other critics have yielded assent, we hope in part to ascertain the motives and methods of the playwrights in their joint labonrs." p. 33. Brought to you by | University of Arizona Authenticated Download Date | 6/1/15 2:55 AM 220 0. L. HATCHER, (2) As to the Fletcher-Massinger plays — "A somewhat different plan was followed by Fletcher and Massinger, Massinger customarily taking the first and last acts, and Fletcher the major part of the three intervening" (p. 37). (3) u In the continuous co-operation of Fletcher with Beaumont and of Fletcher with Massinger, a fixed method of collaboration, based on a structural division (that is, one by acts and scenes) rather than a division of subject matter, was held to pretty consistently. p. 36. Under neither arrangement was it usual for one author to have exclusive Charge of a separate plot or character, äs Ford did in The Witch of Edmonton. Fletcher simply brought to completion a plot already far ad- vanced by Beaumont, or carried on a story begun by Massinger and to be flnished by him" (p. 37). Mr. Thompson does not furnish a list of the plays and the assignments within them which he accepts äs agreed on by critics, and äs being therefore safe foundations for his work; but at one point and another in his article, he cites the following plays äs establishing his views:J) — (1) As Fletcher-Beaumont plays — Thierry and Theodoret, The Prophetess, The Coxcomb,*) Philaster, A hing and No Jcing, An Honest Man's Fortune, The Maitfs Tragedy. (2) As Fletcher-Massinger plays — The False One, The Eider Brother, The Spanish Unräte, The Little French Lawyer, The Bloody Brother. J) In a letter written after the present article was coinposed, Mr. Thompson makes a few supplementary explanations which I am glad to place before the reader. He thmks A Maid's Tragedy, Philaster, A King andno king and Four Plays in One give the clearest jjroof that Fletcher took an inconsiderable part of the plot and that mainly in the fourth and fifth acts, and he notes The Scornfut Lady äs a marked exception to this rule, with- drawing several others in which a third author has been found by some. He cites äs the foundation for his theory äs to the Fletcher-Massinger Collaboration, The Eider Brother, A Very Woman, The False One, The Spanish Curate and The Little French Lawyer, and grants that The Prophetess shows a reversal of the plan suggested in his article. *) These first three are the exceptions noted above in his conclusions. Brought to you by | University of Arizona Authenticated Download Date | 6/1/15 2:55 AM FLETCHER'S HABITS OF DRAMATIC COLLABORATION. 221 The present article will concern itself chiefly with these plays but will cite various others which have been at times attributed to one or the other group. The article under review seemed so natural an advance upon the conclusions of the metrical critics and contained such interesting generalisations, that the present writer was led to look further for the reflex influence of Fletcher's collaborators upon him. A beginning was made by re-examining the conclusions of the critics whom Mr. Thompson cites äs his guiding authorities — Fleay, Boyle, Oliphant, and Macaulay — äs also those of Dyce, Bullen etc., and it was unfor- tunately discovered that the chosen critics frequently differed not only from others but among themselves, äs to the plays cited by him; and that they often differed not only äs to what part should be assigned to Fletcher and what to Beaumont in the Fletcher·Beaumont plays, or what to Fletcher and what to Massinger in the Fletcher - Massinger group, but äs to the actuai authors involved at all in the plays in question; and thus reduced the problem of collaboration to its first stage of uncertainty, whereas Mr. Thompson had passed on to the third, assuming agreement in the two lower stages. For clearness we may subject the two groups of plays cited above to the two tests of agreement among critics: — (1) As to whether the play is by Fletcher and Beaumont alone, or in the second group, by Fletcher and Mas- singer alone. (2) As to the part of each of the two dramatists involved in any given play passing the first test. Following the order observed in citing the plays before, — Thierry and Theodoret is given by Fleay1) to Fletcher, Massinger and Field (?); by Boyle2) to Fletcher and Massinger l) The refereiice here is to Fleay's latest assignments, in The Chronide of the English Drama l 205. Fleay makes the part of Field doubtful. *) Boyle gives the play to Fletcher and Massinger and a third author, and refuses to recognise it äs that of Beaumont-Middleton, Rowley, Dekker or Field, Fletcher's more natural partners (JSngl Stud. V p. 93). Later still (Engl Stud. VIII, 57—61 Boyle gives Beaumont 430 lines, Fletcher 250, and the rest to the 3rd unknown hand. Brought to you by | University of Arizona Authenticated Download Date | 6/1/15 2:55 AM 222 O. L. HATCHER, and later to a third collaborator whom he cannot identify; by Macaulay1), to Beaumont andFletcher; and by Oliphant2) to Beaumont, Fletcher and Massinger. The Proplietess is usually classed in general terms äs Fletcher's and Massinger's jointly, but Fleay, Boyle and Oliphant all detect in it traces of an earlier play not by either Fletcher or Massinger; so that all really imply triple authorship and the play cannot be safely included in the purely Fletcher- Massinger group. The Coxcomb — given by Fleay and Macaulay to Beaumont and Fletcher; thought by Boyle, at one stage of his conclusions, to be a third author's revision of a Beaumont-Fletcher play and then too much altered to warrant attribution of parts; called also by Oliphant the work of three dramatists. Philaster — given by Macaulay to Beaumont alone. The Honest Man's Fortune — assigned by Fleay to Fletcher, Massinger, Field, and Daborne; by Boyle, to Beaumont, Fletcher, Massinger and Tourneur; by Oliphant to four authors, — Field, Fletcher, Massinger and a fourth not named; and by Macaulay to Fletcher and a second author not named. By the disagreement of the chief critics therefore, äs regards the authors collaborating in the plays of the first group named by Mr. Thompson, only two of the seven cited remain after even the first test is applied, these two being A king and No king and The Maid's Tragedy. Out of 14 or more plays, at various times assigned to Beaumont and Fletcher together, two make a small basis for generalisations äs to method, but even here some disagreement among critics is to be reckoned with, if we apply the second test. — In A king and No king the four main critics are sub- stantially in accord, assigning parts to Beaumont and Fletcher äs follows B — I, II, , IV 4, V 2, 4. F — IV l, 2, 3, VI, 3, *) Francis Beaumont A Critical Study 1888. p. 196. *) Engl Mud. XV, 352. Brought to you by | University of Arizona Authenticated Download Date | 6/1/15 2:55 AM FLETCHER'S HABITS OF DRAMATIC COLLABOBATION. 223 and the agreement is entirely in favour of Mr. Thompson's theory that Fletcher did not usually begin his part of the play until it was well under way. For The Maiffs Tragedy the critical assignments are these: — Fleay:*) B — 11, II l, 2, 3 III l, 2 IV 2V 2b, 4 F^-I 2 IV l, VI, 2a, 3, Boyle:2) B — 11, 2 (part) l, III l, 2 IV 2 V 4 F — (?)2 IV l, V 2, 3, Oliphant: 3) B — 11, 2 II l, III l, 2 IV 2V 2b, 4 F— II 2 IV l, VI, 2a, 3, Macaulay:4) B — I II III 4 IV 2 V 4 F — IV l, V l, 2, 3, There is evidently considerable agreement here, but the differences are signiflcant. Macaulay, favouring Mr. Thompson's idea, gives Beaumont I and II entire, but Fleay finds I 2 to be Fletcher's, Boyle and Oliphant give him II 2, so that there is some presumption in favour of his having worked on that play in its very early stages, and by one or another critic, if not by all, his band is found, in each act of the play, in such an occasional way that it is hard to trace any guiding principle.
Recommended publications
  • Front.Chp:Corel VENTURA
    Book Reviews 145 circumstances, as in his dealings with Polonius, and Rosencrantz and Guild- enstern. Did he not think he was killing the King when he killed Polonius? That too was a chance opportunity. Perhaps Hirsh becomes rather too confined by a rigorous logical analysis, and a literal reading of the texts he deals with. He tends to brush aside all alternatives with an appeal to a logical certainty that does not really exist. A dramatist like Shakespeare is always interested in the dramatic potential of the moment, and may not always be thinking in terms of plot. (But as I suggest above, the textual evidence from plot is ambiguous in the scene.) Perhaps the sentimentalisation of Hamlet’s character (which the author rightly dwells on) is the cause for so many unlikely post-renaissance interpretations of this celebrated soliloquy. But logical rigour can only take us so far, and Hamlet, unlike Brutus, for example, does not think in logical, but emotional terms. ‘How all occasions do inform against me / And spur my dull revenge’ he remarks. Anthony J. Gilbert Claire Jowitt. Voyage Drama and Gender Politics 1589–1642: Real and Imagined Worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003. Pp 256. For Claire Jowitt, Lecturer in Renaissance literature at University of Wales Aberystwyth, travel drama depicts the exotic and the foreign, but also reveals anxieties about the local and the domestic. In this her first book, Jowitt, using largely new historicist methodology, approaches early modern travel plays as allegories engaged with a discourse of colonialism, and looks in particular for ways in which they depict English concerns about gender, leadership, and national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMALE PROPHETIC FIGURES in SHAKESPEARE's PLAYS by ALAN
    “BECOMES A WOMAN BEST”: FEMALE PROPHETIC FIGURES IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS by ALAN MORRIS COCHRUM Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON December 2015 Copyright © by Alan Morris Cochrum 2015 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the helpfulness and professional dedication of my dissertation committee chair, Dr. Amy Tigner, in shepherding this work to completion. I am also grateful to Dr. Jacqueline Fay and Dr. Kevin Gustafson for their willingness to serve as the other members of my committee, and to Dr. Jim Warren, who along with Dr. Tigner and Dr. Fay served on my comprehensive-exams committee. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Penny Ingram for her help during the prospectus process. I received a great deal of support over the years from many relatives, friends, and fellow students, for whose encouragement and prayers I am grateful. I would also like to thank my children, Lindsay, Blair, Nathaniel, and Alexander; my parents, Morris and Bonnie Cochrum; and my late mother-in-law, Jimmie Frazier. And, most important, this project could not have been completed without the constant love and support of my wife, Dr. Jennifer Cochrum, DPT. Nov. 9, 2015 iii Abstract “BECOMES A WOMAN BEST”: FEMALE PROPHETIC FIGURES IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS Alan Morris Cochrum, PhD The University of Texas at Arlington, 2015 Supervising Professor: Amy Tigner This dissertation argues that female characters in Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale, Henry VIII, Richard III, Macbeth, and 1 Henry VI function as prophets in the style of the Old Testament.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Poets
    THE E NG L I S H P O E T S S E LE CT I O N S WITH CR ITI CA L I NTRODUCTI ONS MATTHE W A R NOLD E‘DH ED BY ' Y WA R H P H R D . THO MA S UM , M A L I V O . I ' B EN J ONS QN to D R YD E N Mfihm m m Quirk MA CMI LLA N A ND co. 1 8 8 0 C O NT E NT S . m as BEN J ONSON (1 5734637) ‘ ' Echo s Lam ent of Narcissus (from Cynthia s Revels) V enetian Song (from V olpone) S ong (from Epicae ne) ' Charis Triumph (from Underwoods) Truth (from Hym enaei) ‘ ’ Th e Shepherds Holiday (from Pan 5 Anniversary) M Song before th e Entry cf th e asquers (from Th e Fortunate Isles) Lde to Himself (after th e failure of Th e New I nn) — To Ce a om Th e Fo e Song . li (fr r st) Epigram s To my m ere E nglish Censurer On Court- Worm To Fool or Knave n L c o n e of Be f O u y, C u t ss d ord Epitaph on Salathiel Pavy be E a on E za L . H pit ph li th . An Ode to Himself (from Underwoods) To th e Memory of my Beloved Master William Shakespeare (from th e F Fo o irst li ) . Epitaph on th e Coun tess of Pembroke (from Underwoods) Epitaph on Master Philip G ray (from Underw oo ds) Epode (from Th e Forest) To Heaven (from Th e Forest) WI LLI AM DRUMMOND or HAWTHORND EN (1 585—1 649) H e Editor Extracts from th e Poems S onnets S extai n Song To Chloris Sonn o ir W A e ande et t S .
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    206 Fletcherian Dramatic Achievement Bibliography Primary sources Apology for Actors Thomas Dekker, An Apology for Actors (1612), ed. Richard H. Per- kinson, New York 1941 Aristotle Poetics, tr. W. Hamilton Fyfe, The Loeb Classics Library, Cam- bridge, Mass., London 1927 St Augustine St Augustine, The Teacher, in Against the Academicians; and, The Teach- er, trans. Peter King, Indianapolis, Cambridge 1995 Bellenden The Chronicles of Scotland: Compiled by Hector Boece: Translated into Scots by John Bellenden, 1531, ed. R. W. Chambers and Edith C. Batho, vol. I, Edinburgh and London 1938 Bowers I-X The Dramatic Works in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon, gen. ed. Fredson Bowers, 10 vols, Cambridge UP 1966–1996 [Cicero] Ad Herennium, tr. Harry Caplan; The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass., London 1954 Demetrius and Enanthe MS John Fletcher, Demetrius and Enanthe, ed. Margaret McLaren Cook and F. P. Wilson, The Malone Society Reprints 1950 (1951) Dio Dio Cassius, Dio’s Roman History, tr. Earnest Cary, vol. vii, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass., London 1961 Faithful Friends The Faithful Friends, ed. G. R. Proudfoot and G. M. Pinciss, The Malone Society Reprints 1970 (1975) Henslowe’s Diary Henslowe’s Diary, ed. R. A. Foakes, 2nd edition, Cambridge UP 2002. Howard-Hill (1980) Sir John Van Olden Barnavelt: by John Fletcher and Philip Massinger, ed. T. H. Howard-Hill, The Malone Society Reprints 1979 (1980) Bonduca MS Bonduca: by John Fletcher, ed. W. W. Greg, The Malone Society Re- prints, 1951 Mann Thomas Mann, Doctor Faustus, tr. H. T. Lowe-Porter, Everyman’s Library, vol.80, 1992 Masque of Queens Ben Jonson, The Masque of Queens (1609), published in his Workes (1616): 945–964 Meres Francis Meres, Palladis Tamia (1598), Scholars’ Facsimiles & Re- prints, New York 1938 Metrical Boece (1858) The Buik of the Chroniclis of Scotland; or, A Metrical Version of the History of Hector Boece; By William Stewart (1535), ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Sejanus, the King's Men Altar Scenes, and the Theatrical Production Of
    2952 Early Theatre 20.2 (2017), 77–98 http://dx.doi.org/10.12745/et.20.2.2952 John Kuhn Sejanus, the King’s Men Altar Scenes, and the Theatrical Production of Paganism This article traces the lineage of the popular performance set-piece of the ‘oracular altar scene’ from its inception in Jonson’s Sejanus through its frequent reuse by the King’s Men and their imitators later in the century. By doing so, it demonstrates how material practices of reuse in the seventeenth-century theatre helped shape the produc- tion of popular knowledge about the nature of ‘pagan’ ritual and its practitioners in the Stuart era of intensified antiquarian discovery and colonial expansion. The fifth act of Ben Jonson’s Sejanus, a Jacobean tragedy set in decadent imper- ial Rome, contains a striking moment of intersection between antiquarianism and performance, as the play’s scheming, eponymous favourite agrees to propiti- ate a statue of the goddess Fortuna, grudgingly seeking divine advice about his political fortunes. Accompanied by the music of flutes and trumpets, a priest incants lines translated from Seneca while performing complex rituals of lustra- tion (washing his hands), libation (eating and administering honey and milk to the participants), and propitiation (placing milk, honey, and burning poppy on the altar bearing Fortuna’s statue), all as Sejanus looks on. Surprisingly, these distinctly alien, non-Christian religious rites produce true future knowledge: the hitherto sessile statue of the goddess (probably a company member in a statue costume) miraculously becomes animated and turns her face away. The predic- tion implied by this silent rejection — that Sejanus has lost her favour and his luck has run out — is quickly vindicated for the audience in the next scene, when the favourite’s downfall begins.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa State Journal of Research 56.1
    IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH I MAY, 1982 4'3 -439 Vol. 56, No. 4 IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 56 (August, 1981-May, 1982) No. 1, August, 1981 ASPECTS IN RENAISSANCE SCHOLARSHIP PAPERS PRESENTED AT "SHAKESPEARE AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES" SYMPOSIUM, 1981 From the Editors. 1 GALYON, L. R. Introduction...................... ...... 5 BEVINGTON, D. M. "Why Should Calamity Be Full of Words?" The Efficacy of Cursing in Richard III . 9 ANDERSON, D. K., Jr. The King's Two Rouses and Providential Revenge in Hamlet . 23 ONUSKA, J. T., Jr. Bringing Shakespeare's Characters Down to Earth: The Significance of Kneeling . 31 MULLIN, M. Catalogue-Index to Productions of the Shakespeare Memorial/Royal Shakespeare Theatre, 1879-1978 . 43 SCHAEFER, A. J. The Shape of the Supernatitral: Fuseli on Shakespeare. 49 POAGUE, L. "Reading" the Prince: Shakespeare, Welles, and Some Aspects of Chimes at Midnight . 57 KNIGHT, W. N. Equity in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. 67 STATON, S. F. Female Transvestism in Renaissance Comedy: "A Natural Perspective, That Is and Is Not" . 79 IDE, R. S. Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy and the Providential Play-Within-a-Play. 91 STEIN, C.H. Justice and Revenge in The Spanish Tragedy... 97 * * * * * * * * * * No. 2, November, 1981 From the Editors.. ... 105 TABLE OF CONTENTS PUHL, J. Forearm liquid crystal thermograms during sustained and rhythmic handgrip contractions . 107 COUNTRYMAN, D. W. and D. P. KELLEY. Management of existing hardwood stands can be profitable for private woodland owners....... .... 119 MERTINS, C. T. and D. ISLEY. Charles E. Bessey: Botanist, educator, and protagonist . 131 HELSEL, D. B.
    [Show full text]
  • PURCELL CHACONNE DIOCLESIAN Complete Masque from Timon of Athens
    dio single booklet.qxd 19/3/08 10:52 am Page 1 Chan 0569/70 PURCELL CHACONNE DIOCLESIAN complete Masque from Timon of Athens Catherine Pierard James Bowman John Mark Ainsley Michael George Collegium Musicum 90 Richard Hickox CHAN 0569 - BOOK.qxd 19/3/08 10:43 am Page 2 Henry Purcell (1659–1695) Dioclesian Catherine Pierard soprano James Bowman alto Mark Padmore tenor* John Mark Ainsley tenor Michael George bass COMPACT DISC ONE 1 First Musick 2:12 2 Second Musick 1:25 3 Overture 3:45 ACT I 4 First Act Tune (Hornpipe) 0:43 ACT II 20:15 5 Song (Bass) ‘Great Diocles the Boar has kill’d’ – 2:20 Chorus ‘Sing Iô’s!’ 6 Song (Soprano) ‘Charon the peaceful Shade invites’ 1:29 Henry Purcell 7 Symphony for Trumpets and Violins 1:27 Mary Evans Picture Library 8 Duet (Soprano, Bass), Chorus ‘Let all mankind the 1:17 pleasure share’ 9 Martial Song (Tenor) ‘Let the soldiers rejoice’ 4:35 Trio (TT*B) ‘Rejoice with a general voice’ Retornello (for trumpets and hautboys) Trio (TT*B) ‘To Mars let ’em raise – Rejoice with a general voice’ Retornello (for trumpets and hautboys) 3 CHAN 0569 - BOOK.qxd 19/3/08 10:43 am Page 4 10 A Symphony of Flutes – Michael George a Bacchanalian, shepherd Nathan Berg a Silvan, a Bacchanalian Song (Alto) ‘Since the toils and the hazards’ Quartet (SATB) ‘Let the priests…’ – Chorus ‘All sing…’ 5:16 2 Cupid, Chorus ‘Call the nymphs’ 2:30 11 Dance of Furies 3:01 3 Duet (a Bacchanalian & a Silvan) ‘Come, come away’ 1:07 12 Second Act Tune 0:49 4 Chorus ‘Behold, O mighty’st of Gods’ 3:13 ACT III 9:41 5 Paspe (The first entry of heroes on the stage) 0:44 13 Two in one upon a Ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennyson's Poems
    Tennyson’s Poems New Textual Parallels R. H. WINNICK To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. TENNYSON’S POEMS: NEW TEXTUAL PARALLELS Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels R. H. Winnick https://www.openbookpublishers.com Copyright © 2019 by R. H. Winnick This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work provided that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way which suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: R. H. Winnick, Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2019. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0161 In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Unearthing the Tempest
    Unearthing The Tempest The Tempest tells the story of Prospero, the deposed Duke of Milan, and his daughter, Miranda, who have spent the last twelve years in exile on a mysterious island. Upon first washing ashore with his infant child, Prospero captures two of the island’s occupants; with their help, Prospero spends the next twelve years plotting his revenge. The play opens on its namesake: a great storm of Prospero’s devising. Through the magic he has appropriated from Ariel, a mystical spirit, and the natural resources he has acquired from Caliban, the island’s only known native inhabitant, Prospero washes those who wronged him to his shores, seeking to bring them to justice and reestablish Milan’s natural order of succession. What follows is a story of revenge, redemption, and renewal as Prospero learns the meaning of mercy and forgiveness. Born in Stratford-upon-Avon, England in 1564, William Shakespeare is the author of some of the most well known plays in the western canon of dramatic literature. As he moved into the last stage of his career and life, Shakespeare was increasingly drawn to stories of restoration and rebirth, with a strong emphasis on father-daughter relationships. Other plays that share these themes have become known as “the romances,” which also include The Winter’s Tale, Cymbeline, and Pericles: Prince of Tyre. Penned between 1610 and 1611 under the patronage of King James I of England, The Tempest had its first recorded performance in 1611 on All Saints’ Day at Whitehall Palace. The King’s Men, the acting troupe to which Shakespeare belonged, performed the play before the King and his court.
    [Show full text]
  • Semester at Sea Course Syllabus
    SEMESTER AT SEA COURSE SYLLABUS Voyage: Spring 2013 Discipline: English Literature ENGL 1559: The Sea And The Mirror Lower Division Faculty Name: Dr. J. H. Miller Pre-requisites: An introductory literature course COURSE DESCRIPTION There be three things which are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not: The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid. The way of a ship in the midst of the sea has fascinated human beings from the very beginnings of literature to the present day. Celebrating the elemental relationship of man and the natural world, the sea itself and voyages upon it have inspired poems, short stories, novels, and plays, often – as Hamlet said – “to show virtue her feature, scorn her own image, and the very age and body of the time his form and pressure.” The sea also functions as a metaphor for the great, universal themes of humanity. From the darkness upon the face of the deep, to the spirit moving upon the face of the waters, to the way of a man with a maid, this course will study selected sea voyage narratives that enlighten our relationships to each other and to the sea around us. COURSE OBJECTIVES Our geographic journey over the next four months will expose us to life at sea and to different cultures as we sail across oceans and visit fourteen countries on three continents. But we are also collectively embarking on another journey – an interior and highly personal one of exploration and self-discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • The King's Men's Shakespearean Repertory Meghan C. Andrews
    1 The King’s Men’s Shakespearean Repertory Meghan C. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin My paper will focus on the immediately post-Shakespearean seventeenth century: the King’s Men’s repertory in the wake of Shakespeare’s retirement, and specifically the plays written by Fletcher (and his co-authors) while he was principal dramatist for the King’s Men. I will argue that the company was the first group to make Shakespeare “Shakespeare” and to imagine themselves in a specifically post-Shakespearean moment, for even after Shakespeare’s death the company self-consciously cultivated a Shakespearean repertory style in order to provide continuity with their earlier drama. In this way, Shakespeare became a guiding ideal for the company as much as a former sharer, his descendants’ works less derivative and more working within a specific house style. Particularly, I plan to examine two moments in Fletcher’s career. The first is the period 1620-22, in which Fletcher wrote a cluster of plays that were heavily influenced by The Tempest. I will argue that these plays served as a form of advance marketing for the First Folio, and constructed a particular image of “Shakespeare” that a reader opening to the first page of the Folio would immediately recognize. The second moment concerns the group of plays written by Fletcher (and Beaumont) for the King’s Men from Philaster on. The influence of Beaumont and Fletcher’s tragicomedy on Shakespeare has long been acknowledged, but I will argue that as Fletcher began to write for the King’s Men before, during, and after Shakespeare’s quasi-retirement in 1610, he cultivated a Shakespearean style, especially intrigued by the elder playwright’s focus on active heroines.
    [Show full text]
  • LITERARY EDITING of SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH DRAMA by MARIKO NAGASE
    LITERARY EDITING OF SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH DRAMA by MARIKO NAGASE A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The Shakespeare Institute School of English, Drama and American & Canadian Studies University of Birmingham January 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. INFORMATION FOR ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING SERVICES The information on this form will be published. Surname: Nagase First names: Mariko Degree: PhD College/Department: The Shakespeare Institute, Department of English Full title of thesis: Literary Editing of Seventeenth-Century English Drama Date of submission: January 31, 2012 Date of award of degree (leave blank): Abstract (not to exceed 200 words - any continuation sheets must contain the author's full name and full title of the thesis): This thesis explores how literary editing for the dramatic publication was developed in seventeenth-century England. Chapter 1 discusses how the humanist scholars embraced the concept of textual editing and put it into practice about a half century after the invention of the press. Chapter 2 addresses the development of the concept of literary editing in seventeenth-century England by investigating the editorial arguments preserved in the paratextual matter.
    [Show full text]