Newsletter No. 122 July 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Newhaven Fort
Newhaven Fort Feasiblity Study Report May 2012 Barrie Tankel Partnership (BTP) 2.0 Stage 1 Quotation We would anticipate our main role would be the Our lump sum fee for the above scope of services provision of construction cost advice and overall is in the sum of £3,500 excluding VAT and travel development cost management. We would also costs. advise on project and building programme time frames, procurement options and risk profiles of Travel would be charged at cost plus 10% for using the project. public transport or £0.55/mile if car is used. Payment arrangements Monthly. 3.0 Stage 2 Quotation We would be happy to provide a lump sum quotation Professional Indemnity for stage 2 following agreement of a brief. We carry PII cover up to £5m. A copy of confirmation Should services be required on a day rate these of cover is attached. would be charged as follows – Note all rates exclude VAT and disbursements. References 1. Mr Peng Loh [email protected] 2. Norman Reed – [email protected] Director ................................................ £700/day Associate .............................................. £550/day We anticipate the stage 1 process to take place Surveyor ............................................... £400/day over a 3 month period and have based and resourced our cost consultancy fee on this basis. We have assumed that we will be required to provide up to 3 cost plans, our fee will include for value engineering proposals. We envisage providing initial programme and procurement advice and will summarise all other peripheral cost including consultant cost should this service be required. Due to the fairly extended 5 year work plan further consideration should be given to the effects inflation may have on the budget and an assessment made on this basis. -
BRIGHTON Address: Stafford House Brighton, 61 Western Road, Hove, BN3 1JD
Stafford House Summer Information Sheet STAFFORD HOUSE BRIGHTON Address: Stafford House Brighton, 61 Western Road, Hove, BN3 1JD Brighton is one of the UK’s most diverse Some of Brighton’s must-see highlights and liberal cities. A truly unique seaside include; playing arcade games on the iconic city located on the sunny South East coast Brighton Palace Pier, a visit to the elaborate of England. It’s a very warm and welcoming Royal Pavilion or hunting for world-class CLASSIC COURSE place for international victors. Each year street art in the bohemian North Laine it attracts up to 11 million tourists. It’s an quarter. London is also easy to reach from HOMESTAY ONLY equally popular place to live, especially for Brighton, just an hour away. young people, and is often referred to as the AGES 12-18* (GROUPS ONLY) “happiest place to live in the UK”. *18 year old students only accepted as part of a group where all students are returning to second- FACILITIES ary education in September 2021. 18 year olds must follow all school rules as minors. Total Capacity 100 Max. ratio of showers/toilets to beds 1:6 Ensuite Kitchen for Group Leader use Standard Laundry - service wash * Single Laundry - coin operated, self-service Twin WiFi access Multi-bed Drink making facilities Television Lounge Vending machines Common room Swimming pool Computer Room Coeliac / Special diets on request ** Towels provided Halal food on request ** * In host families ** Must be booked at least two months before arrival N.B. Maximum stay in homestay for under-16s is 27 nights -
Newhaven Town Council Annual Report 2009-2010
Picture courtesy of the Sussex Express Newhaven Town Council Annual Report 2009-2010 Introduction by the Town Mayor Councillor Carla Butler It was a great honour to be chosen as the 26 th Mayor of Newhaven and it has been a year that I will never forget. My main objective during my term was to support the young people of the town who often get a bad press. One way I wanted to achieve this was by the introduction of a “Young Mayor”. In July Daly Tucknott was elected as Young Mayor and Chloe Leister as deputy. Although at times we learnt how the project would work as we went along it has been very successful and there has been a lot of positive feedback from the public and other authorities along the way. I would like to thank both Daly and Chloe for their support and especially Daly for accompanying me at so many events throughout the year. I was particularly pleased that it was agreed Daly could join me in the line up to meet Her Royal Highness Princess Anne when she visited Tideway School. This had the effect of showing to other people the importance of the role. It also proved that young people can learn that they can make a difference and contribution before they can even vote and they are still able to influence decisions which are made. I have been able to support many fundraising objectives of different groups in the town. Most surprising for me was whilst helping raise funds for the local branch of Mencap, I found out that they receive no funds from Mencap itself and rely totally on volunteers and their own fundraising. -
Substance and Practice
SUBSTANCE AND PRACTICE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND THE ROYAL ENGINEERS IN CANADA Elizabeth Vincent .... Environment Canada Environnement Canada • ""!"'" Parks Service Service des parcs SUBSTANCE AND PRACTICE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND THE ROYAL ENGINEERS IN CANADA Elizabeth Vincent Studies in Archaeology Architecture and History National Historic Sites Parks Service Environment Canada ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1993. Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other book stores. or by mail from the Canada Communication Group - Publishing. Supply and Services Canada. Ottawa. Ontario. Canada KIA OS9. Published under the authority of the Minister of the Environment. Ottawa, 1993. Editing: Sheila Ascroft Desktop Production: Lucie Forget Cover: Rod Won Cover illustration: front elevation of the Officers' Quarters. Fredericton, N.B.• 1851. (National Archives of Canada. Map Collection) Parks publishes the results of its research in archaeology, architecture and history. A list of publications is available from National Historic Sites Pub lications. Parks Service, Environment Canada. 1600 Liverpool Court, Ot tawa. Ontario. Canada KIA OH3. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Vincent. Elizabeth Substance and practice: building technology and the Royal Engineers in Canada (Studies in archaeology, architecture and history. ISSN 0821-1027) Issued also in French under title: Le Genie royal au Canada, materiaux et techniques de construction. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN Q-660-14820-X DSS cat. no. R61-2/9-60E 1. Great Britain - Army - Military construction operations - History 19th century. 2. Canada - History, Military - 19th century. 3. Building materials - Canada - History - 19th century. 1. Canadian Parks Service. National Historic Sites. Il, Title. Ill. Series. UG413.V561993 725' .18'0971 C93-099413-2 ~~_ll~~ .~(~~ _ <:OIl1I1lUnic..ition Cnmmunicutiou Ii --_._--~-_.._-_._--.- - I'uhtishin/.! FJitill1l TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. -
Home Guard (United Kingdom)
Home Guard (United Kingdom) The Home Guard (initially Local Defence Volunteers or LDV) was an armed citizen militia Home Guard supporting the British Army during the Second World initially "Local Defence Volunteers" War. Operational from 1940 to 1944, the Home Guard had 1.5 million local volunteers otherwise ineligible for military service, such as those who were too young or too old to join the regular armed services (regular military service was restricted to those aged 18 to 41) or those in reserved occupations. Excluding those already in the armed services, the civilian police or civil defence, approximately one in five men were volunteers. Their role was to act as a secondary defence force in case of invasion by the forces of Nazi Germany and other Axis powers.[1][2] Home Guard post at Admiralty Arch in central The Home Guard were to try to slow down the advance London, 21 June 1940. of the enemy even by a few hours to give the regular troops time to regroup. They were also to defend key Active 14 May 1940 – 3 December communication points and factories in rear areas 1944 against possible capture by paratroops or fifth Disbanded 31 December 1945 columnists. A key purpose was to maintain control of the civilian population in the event of an invasion, to Country United Kingdom forestall panic and to prevent communication routes Branch British Army from being blocked by refugees to free the regular Role Defence from invasion forces to fight the Germans. The Home Guard continued to man roadblocks and guard the coastal Commanders areas of the United Kingdom and other important Notable Sir Edmund Ironside places such as airfields, factories and explosives stores commanders until late 1944, when they were stood down. -
The Defence of Littlehampton During the Second World War
The Defence of Littlehampton during the Second World War. Countless books have been written about life in Britain during the Second World War, and the role of Sussex is also well documented, notably by John Goodwin in his excellent book ‘Defending Sussex Beaches 1940-1942’, but I have found nothing specific to Littlehampton. This essay aims to explain in detail the way that Littlehampton was defended from the threat of enemy invasion during the period 1939-1945. I myself was not alive at the time, I am not a resident of Littlehampton and I have no military experience- so all the information in this essay is pieced together from other published sources with the aim of explaining things for the general reader. When Littlehampton Fort was built in 1854 the threat of invasion came from France and the bellicose French Emperor Napoleon III. For the next decade British public opinion was terrified that a French landing was imminent and as a consequence a whole chain of forts, known as Palmerston Forts, after the then Prime Minister, was constructed from Portsmouth to Newhaven to protect the Channel beaches. However, in 1870 Napoleon III’s army was defeated by the Prussians and the invasion panic subsided. Indeed throughout the twentieth century Britain and France were allies in the ‘Entente Cordiale.’ So the Sussex coastal fortifications were left to crumble and Littlehampton fort was disarmed in January 1891. From then on Littlehampton had no proper defences, which was all very well until Hitler’s army captured northern France. 1 On 5th June 1940 the German army broke through the French defences along the Belgian border and two days later they had reached Paris. -
26 Pubs 790, 29Mm Spigot Mortar
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED The information given in this document is not to be communicated, either directly or indirectly, to the Press or to any person not holding an official position in His Majesty’s Service. G.'S. Publications Volume I, Pamphlet No. 23 1942 (This pamphlet supersedes the 29-mm. Spigot Mortar (Blacker Bombard) Training Instruction (Provisional, 1941)) Crown Copyright Reserved By Command of the A rmy Council, The War Office, 1th November, 1942. Printed under the Authority of HIS MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE by Keliber, Hudson & Kearns, Ltd., London, S.E.l. { ■ DISTRIBUTION Units with this Equipment ... 2 Copies per Weapon S.A.S. Netheravon ... ... ... ... ... jo CONTENTS CL-'iiV ;■ 1 FACE Section 1. General. ' The anti-tank-role ... ... ... ... ... 2 The anti-personnel role.................................................. 3 Section 2. The spigot mortar and bombs. Lesson 1. General description....................................... ! „ 2. Types of bombs, fuzes, and cartridges ... 7 „ 3. Stripping the firing mechanism ............... 11 ,, 4. Care and maintenance ................. ... 12 Section 3. Drill. Lesson 5. Fall in-—Take post—-Action—Cease firing 15 „ 6. Loading and unloading—holding, aim ing and firing at stationary targets, in anti-tank role ...................................... 18 7. Engaging moving targets ............... 21 8. Action on misfire—causes-ef misfire ... 22 9. Anti-personnel roles—loading and unload ing—sight setting—fire orders ... 24 Section 4. Advanced handling. Lesson 10. Packing the truck—prepare for action— on truck.................................................. 26 „ 11. Coming into action in a weapon pit ,, 12. Siting the mortar, and camouflage Appendix 1. Range rules and safety precautions 31 Destruction of "blinds ” ... / ... 33 ,, 2. Approximate times of flight, and heights of trajectory .. -
V1 (Flying Bomb) Vengance Weapon Site, Hazebrouck
V1 (flying bomb) Vengance weapon site, Hazebrouck stock advisor stock advisor Counter Sometimes finding parking at an airport is impossible...I hate driving around JFK airport parking lot and not being able to find a spot...Making parking reservations is the perfect solution to this problem! Before you head out for a trip make discount airport parking reservations . It's so easy and it will save you a ton of time when you get to the airport parking garage! The descriptions and plans of buildings have been taken from the signs that guide the visitor around this Home Page remarkably well preserved site hidden in the woods. The Coalhouse Fort Project was started in the 1980's to Click Here to see map of the area maintain, restore and promote Coalhouse Fort. The From 1942, the German Air Force, The Luftwaffe, developed an unmanned aircraft, a flying bomb known as Fort was built between 1861 the V1. This was one of two weapons being developed, the other being a stratospheric rocket. This was to and 1874 and remained in be the V” and Hitler hoped it would be used to destroy London, force the UK to surrender and enable him to service until 1956 when concentrate his efforts on attacking the USSR. Coastal Defence was abolished. In order to launch the V1, the Germans begin the construction in the spring of 1943 in France of four large bunkers and 96 bases. These were located from the Cotenin region to the Belgium border. The site at Bois Open Days For 2007 des Huit-Rues was chosen for one of the bases. -
DYNAMIC COASTS BEACHES at RISK: Key Stage 3 Resource Pack
DYNAMIC COASTS BEACHES AT RISK: Key Stage 3 Resource Pack PLACES TO GO These are some suggestions of coastal and environmental education related places to visit; they all fall within the English side of the BAR Project. Most places will offer either educational facilities and / or are considered excellent coastal sites for demonstrating and complementing the worksheets within this pack. They are listed in more or less geographical order, following the coastline starting in the west. You are advised to check details before organising a visit. Wakehurst Place Royal Botanic Gardens, Ardingly, Nr Haywards Heath, West Sussex RH17 6TN. Tel (Education Officer): 01444 894094 Website: www.kew.org Email: [email protected] • Home to the Millennium Seed Bank with state of the art exhibition and eight exterior parterres showing habitats from the seashore to the uplands. • School parties welcome (prior booking required). • Teachers’ packs and worksheets available. Foredown Tower Countryside Centre Foredown Road, Portslade, Brighton BN41 2EW. Tel: 01273 292092 Website: www.foredown.virtualmuseum.info Email: [email protected] For information about school visits: [email protected] • Edwardian water tower housing one of only two operational camera obscuras in SE England. • The centre has interactive displays and exhibits, a weather station, countryside research and scientific data. • The museum runs an educational programme linked to the national curriculum. • School parties welcome (prior booking required). Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill House, Shoreham Road, Henfield, West Sussex BN5 9SD. Tel: 01273 492630 Website: www.sussexwt.org.uk Email: [email protected] • Woods Mill is home to a 15 acre nature reserve with trails, exhibitions, audio-visual programmes, a dipping pool, streams, a lake and woodland. -
By Phil Yates
Mid -war Intelligence Briefing for British and Commonwealth Forces in North Africa Jan 1942 to May 1943 Seven Mid-war Intelligence Briefings from North Africa By Phil Yates UPDATED ON 29 JULY 2013 BRITISH I NTROD U BRITISH FORCES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN CTION “Before Alamein we never had a victory. After Alamein we never had a defeat.” —Winston Churchill, British Prime Minister. The 50th (Northumbrian) Infantry Division was a Territorial GAZALA Division from the north of England, mostly coal miners At the end of May 1942, Rommel’s Afrikakorps drove south and workers from the foundries and mills of Durham and through the desert around the Gazala line smashing much Yorkshire. The division’s symbol was two ‘T’s for the Tyne of the British armoured strength in the process, but then and Tees rivers flowing through the recruiting area. found itself trapped in the ‘Cauldron’ with no supply route. It appeared that the British plan was working. 150 Infantry RANCE F Brigade, supported by the Valentines of 44 RTR, was astride In 1940 the division was sent to join the British Expeditionary the vital Trigh Capuzzo—the main supply line through to Force (BEF) fighting alongside the French. After retreating the encircled Afrikakorps. for nearly a week, two battalions of Durham Light Infantry Then, with everything set, the Eighth Army’s commanders and two battalions of Matilda tanks counterattacked the bickered and dithered. Rommel struck back with everything German 7th Panzer Division under General Rommel at he had, desperately trying to break back through 150 Brigade Arras. Although ultimately unsuccessful, the attack bought and open his supply line. -
South Foreland to Beachy Head Shoreline Management Plan April 2006
South Foreland to Beachy Head Shoreline Management Plan April 2006 South Foreland to Beachy Head SMP South Foreland to Beachy Head Shoreline Management Plan April 2006 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Shoreline Management Plan .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Structure of the SMP.............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 The Plan Development Process ............................................................................................ 4 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 The Appraisal Process ........................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Stakeholder Engagement....................................................................................................... 7 2.4 The Existing Environment ...................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Environmental Objectives ...................................................................................................... 8 2.6 Identification and Review of Possible Policy Scenarios........................................................ -
Defence Archaeology
South East Research Framework Resource Assessment and Research Agenda for Defence (2013 with additions in 2019) Defence since the application of gunpowder: 1380- 2020 Victor Smith With contributions from Luke Barber, David Bird, Martin Brown, David Burridge, Chris Butler, Jonathan Coad, Wayne Cocroft, Ben Croxford, Paul Cuming, Ben Found, John Goodwin, Peter Kendall, John Kenyon, Andrew Saunders and John Wells Contents Resource Assessment ................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Geographical factors and influences ................................................................... 3 The meaning of the region’s defences................................................................. 4 The defence heritage resource ............................................................................ 6 The beginning of the Age of Gunpowder................................................................. 6 Gunports in castles and town walls ..................................................................... 6 The role of firearms in fortifications as part of the strategy of defence ................ 6 The new age of long range artillery defence ........................................................... 7 The decline of the castle and walled town ........................................................... 7 The strengthening of the Crown and a new emphasis on systems