Gambling Interests Funded Delay Trip Later in 2000, Lawmaker’S Vote Helped Defeat Regulatory Measure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gambling Interests Funded Delay Trip Later in 2000, Lawmaker’S Vote Helped Defeat Regulatory Measure ABCDE Democracy Dies in Darkness SATURDAY, MARCH 12, 2005 Gambling Interests Funded DeLay Trip Later in 2000, Lawmaker’s Vote Helped Defeat Regulatory Measure By James V. Grimaldi reviewed by The Washington Post. The and R. Jeffrey Smith Choctaw and eLottery each sent a check Washington Post Staff Writers for $25,000, according to the documents. An Indian tribe and a gambling ser- They now say that they were unaware the vices company made donations to a Wash- money was being used to finance DeLay’s ington public policy group that covered travels. most of the cost of a $70,000 trip to Brit- But Amy Ridenour, president of the ain by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay National Center, said that, when the trip (R-Tex.), his wife, two aides and two lob- was arranged, Abramoff promised he byists in mid-2000, two months before would secure financial backing. She said DeLay helped kill legislation opposed by that even without Abramoff’s efforts, the the tribe and the company. National Center would have borne the cost The sponsor of the week-long trip of the trip, which was intended to allow the listed in DeLay’s financial disclosures was group to network with conservative British the nonprofit National Center for Public politicians and included an outing to the Policy Research, but a person involved in famous St. Andrews golf course in Scot- arranging DeLay’s travel said that lobbyist land. Jack Abramoff suggested the trip and then “We paid for the trip,” Ridenour said. arranged for checks to be sent by two of his “This trip was going to be paid for by the clients, the Mississippi Band of Choctaw National Center, regardless of whether we Indians and eLottery Inc. got the donations from the Choctaw or The dates on the checks coincided eLottery.” with the day DeLay left on the trip, May House ethics rules allow lawmakers 25, 2000, according to grants documents and their staffs to have travel expenses paid SATURDAY, MARCH 12, 2005 KLMNO PAGE 2 Indian Tribe, Gambling Firm congressional office has said included a stop in London and Linked to DeLay Trip in 2000 a visit with Margaret Thatcher, along with the golf outing at St. Andrews, where colleagues say only for officially connected travel and only Abramoff has a membership. by organizations directly connected to the DeLay, an avid golfer, listed the pur- trips. The rules also require that lawmak- pose of the trip on a report filed with the ers accurately report the people or organi- House clerk as “educational.” He was zations that pay for the trips. They prohibit majority whip at the time and brought his payments by registered lobbyists for law- wife, Christine, and two top staff members makers’ travel. — Tony Rudy from the whip’s office and DeLay’s spokesman, Dan Allen, said: chief of staff Susan Hirschmann, as well as “The trip was sponsored, organized and her husband, David Hirschmann, accord- paid for by the National Center for Public ing to filings with the House clerk that Policy Research, as our travel disclosures indicated the total cost of transportation, accurately reflect and what the National lodging and meals was $70,265. Center has publicly said.” Abramoff’s attorney, Abbe David Internet Gambling Bill Killed Lowell, declined to comment. Abramoff, Two months later, in July 2000, DeLay the National Center and the flow of money and 43 other Republicans joined 114 Dem- between them are now being investigated ocrats in killing the Internet Gambling by a federal task force and by the Sen- Prohibition Act, which would have made it ate Committee on Indian Affairs; DeLay a federal crime to place certain bets over was admonished three times last year for the Internet and was opposed by eLottery infringements of House ethics rules. and the Choctaws. The bill was supported To prove an ethics violation, inves- by 165 Republicans and 79 Democrats but tigators would have to show that DeLay fell about 25 votes short of passage; because and his staff knew the gambling interests of a parliamentary maneuver, it required a were funding the trip, said Jan W. Baran, two-thirds majority vote. a Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP ethics law- DeLay spokesman Allen said that yer who often represents Republicans. “If DeLay voted against the bill because it had somebody is doing some backdoor financ- exemptions for jai alai and horse and dog ing, how would the member know?” racing. Rudy later that year went to work Abramoff, a member of the National for Abramoff as a lobbyist. Center’s board, joined the DeLays on the The Choctaw Indians run a highly May 25 to June 3, 2000, trip, which DeLay’s profitable casino near Philadelphia, Miss., SATURDAY, MARCH 12, 2005 KLMNO PAGE 3 An Educational Trip In 2000, an Indian tribe and a gambling services company sent $50,000 in checks to a Washington organization, the National Center for Public Policy Research, covering most of the cost of an educational trip to Britain taken by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), according to a person involved in arranging DeLay’s travel. Two months later, DeLay voted against a bill opposed by gambling interests. Lobbyist Jack Abramoff arranged for the donations to the tax-exempt conservative group and went along on the journey, according to the source. Tribe and eLottery Abramoff, who served on the National paid Abramoff to Center’s board, arranged for his Indian Abramoff joined lobby against the and gambling clients to donate the DeLay during the Internet gambling bill. money, according to the source. trip to Britain. Abramoff Tribe wrote a $25,000 In July 2000, DeLay voted check on May 25, 2000, against the gambling bill.* to nonprofit think tank. CHOCTAW National DeLay Trip Internet Center for to Britain, Gambling Public Policy May 25- Prohibition Research June 3, Act ELOTTERY Group 2000 sponsored Gambling company wrote a DeLay’s $25,000 check on May 25, $70,000 trip 2000, to nonprofit group. to Britain. ELottery lobbied against * DeLay’s spokesman said he opposed the bill because the gambling legislation. it had exemptions for horse and dog racing and jai alai. THE WASHINGTON POST that bankrolls their community activities Choctaw story,” she said. On its Web site, and has subsidized an extensive lobbying the center attributes the following state- effort in Washington. The tribe donated ment to DeLay: “The National Center is a total of $65,000 to Ridenour’s group in The Center for conservative communica- 2000 and $1.07 million in 2002. tions.” The Choctaw money was intended to Asked about the DeLay trip to Britain, help the center create a program to build tribal lawyer Bryant Rogers said: “The tribe support for the idea that Indian casinos did not authorize the use of any money for could drive prosperity for poor tribes, this purpose. If it occurred, it occurred Ridenour said. “We were trying to tell the without the tribe’s knowledge.” SATURDAY, MARCH 12, 2005 KLMNO PAGE 4 ELottery is a Connecticut company should not be taxed. that provides Internet services to state lot- Three and a half weeks after DeLay’s teries. One version of the gambling legisla- Jan. 3, 2001, speech saluting Martin “for tion contained a provision that would have all he has done to further the cause of free- severely restricted state lottery sales over dom,” at least one of DeLay’s aides went the Internet. Edwin J. McGuinn, president on a trip via private jet to the Super Bowl of eLot Inc., the parent of eLottery, said the in Tampa arranged and financed by one provision would have killed his company. of Abramoff’s companies. Sources famil- “We wouldn’t have been able to operate,” iar with the trip said the guests were also he said. taken out to an Abramoff-owned gambling McGuinn said he was unaware that ship that was anchored near Tampa. eLottery’s $25,000 check was meant to No one on DeLay’s staff filed a report pay for DeLay’s trip. Of the donation to the disclosing the trip, a task required by House National Center, he said: “It certainly was rules for “the receipt of travel expenses our impression that any and all moneys from private sources” but not for govern- were being positioned to get the attention ment-funded or political travel. and focus of our cause.” DeLay spokesman Allen said: “The DeLay today describes himself as a staffer went down to participate in a longtime opponent of any expansion of National Republican Congressional Com- gambling. But in a House floor speech six mittee party, so it was considered political months after his trip to Britain, he praised travel. The staffer never saw Abramoff dur- the head of the Mississippi Band of Choc- ing the trip.” taw Indians as a “champion of peace and The Internet gambling legislation was prosperity” and placed in the Congressio- the only issue Abramoff and his employer nal Record an editorial praising chief Phil- at the time, Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvelas lip Martin for enriching the tribe through Meeds LLP, mentioned in lobbying disclo- the “construction of a casino.” sure records when they reported earning The editorial, from the magazine $440,000 in fees from eLottery in 2000. Indian Country Today, noted that Mar- The Internet gambling bill was one of sev- tin had also wisely positioned his tribe “to eral legislative issues listed in a separate solidify friendships with Republican pow- lobbying disclosure for the firm’s efforts on erhouses.” It said — in an apparent refer- behalf of the Choctaw, which paid Preston ence to Abramoff — that the tribe and its Gates $880,000 in 2000.
Recommended publications
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
    [Show full text]
  • The Dirty Operation Against Zimbabwe: Soros, Abramoff, and British Africa by Anton Chaitkin
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 35, Number 27, July 11, 2008 Susan Rice, are in total agreement with Republican Presi- overwhelming victories in key states such as Ohio, West Vir- dential candidate John McCain’s advisors on a confronta- ginia, and Pennsylvania. tion strategy against Iran, which includes “preventive mili- But Obama has done nnothing i the direction of taking up tary action.” Clinton’s fighting stance, in favor of stopping home foreclo- sures, smashing the oil cartels and speculators, and suspend- Fundamentals ing the free trade agreements which have devastated the U.S. The core problem with Obama’s shift to the right, how- standard of living. Instead, he went so far as to praise the post- ever, is that he is abandoning the key Democratic constituen- industrial Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Pittsburgh, as repre- cies on the most fundamental issue of all, their standard of senting a great future—when, in fact, it stands upon the grave- living. Obama and any intelligent advisors know they cannot yard of the previous productive heartland of America. win the Presidential race without winning the loyalty of Hill- It’s as if Obama were pre-programming himself to lose. ary Clinton’s core committed base—the unionists, Hispanics, Democrats had better ask themselves, just whose idea is and__________________________________________________ other representatives of the lower 80%, who gave her her that? The Dirty Operation Against Zimbabwe: Soros, Abramoff, and British Africa by Anton Chaitkin The British empire’s effort to overthrow the Zimbabwe gov- the South African gestapo into an illegal U.S.A.-based spy ernment is run through the political apparatus of billionaire network.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2005 No. 130 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. The yeas and nays were ordered. erend Holley has organized 10s of cru- The Reverend Henry Holley, Director The SPEAKER. Pursuant to clause 8, sades worldwide, many attended by lit- of Asian Affairs, Billy Graham Evan- rule XX, further proceedings on this erally millions. The Hong Kong crusade gelistic Association, Marietta, Georgia, question will be postponed. in 1990, for example, extended its mes- offered the following prayer: f sage of hope and faith to over 100 mil- O Lord, You have said that first of all PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE lion people with the gospel, an effort prayers, supplications, and interces- directed by Reverend Holley. sions be made for those in authority. The SPEAKER. Will the gentle- He has served as a special assistant I pray for this Chamber of Represent- woman from Wisconsin (Ms. BALDWIN) to Dr. Billy Graham on projects and atives, that they may have wisdom, in- come forward and lead the House in the missions too numerous to count, and tegrity, courage, faithfulness in their Pledge of Allegiance. has recently lent his talent to Rev- performance. I pray for the Speaker of Ms. BALDWIN led the Pledge of Alle- erend Franklin Graham. Reverend this House and our President. Bless giance as follows: Holley is the embodiment of love and each one with Your presence, enfold I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the compassion and humility.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 “Knock the EPA Out!” Environmental Politics and Community Identity In
    “Knock the EPA Out!” Environmental Politics and Community Identity in Appalachian Ohio* In May 1988, millions of Americans tuned into a special edition of the Oprah Winfrey Show broadcast from a small town in southeastern Ohio, a region hard hit by industrial and mining losses. “They were middle class people, once earning good money in the coal mines [and] in the steel mills,” the show’s opening sequence declared as Rust Belt imagery flashed across the screen. “But the rug was pulled out from under them. They never imagined themselves standing in welfare lines, never imagined relying on food stamps.” As they discussed the problems of job losses in the area, many in the audience, especially those laid-off from the region’s mines, mills and power plants, blamed new environmental regulations, particularly the Clean Air Act, and envisioned a return to the industrial past. “The whole bottom line is: knock the EPA out!” railed one audience member. “We want work. We don’t want the clean air. We want the factories back. We want the mines back.”1 The late 1960s and early 1970s were a golden age for the communities of southeastern Ohio. Nestled in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains, local residents benefited from an upswing in mining employment prompted by the increased use of coal in electricity production. By the mid-1980s, however, a variety of factors including a lack of economic diversification, low education levels, and inadequate transportation as well as the increasing environmental standards encoded in the Clean Air Act manifested in high unemployment, poverty and out- migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Against Nature Is Ultimately About the Corrosive Effect of Corporate Corruption on Our Core American Values—Free-Market Capitalism and Democracy
    PDF Page No: 1 PDF Page No: 2 Inside Front/Back Cover In this powerful and far-reaching indictment of George W. Bush’s White House, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the country’s most prominent environmental attorney, charges that this administration has taken corporate cronyism to such unprecedented heights that it now threatens our health, our national security, and democracy as we know it. In a headlong pursuit of private profit and personal power, Kennedy writes, George Bush and his administration have eviscerated the laws that have protected our nations air, water, public lands, and wildlife for the past thirty years, enriching the president’s political contributors while lowering the quality of life for the rest of us. Kennedy lifts the veil on how the administration has orchestrated these rollbacks almost entirely outside of public scrutiny—and in tandem with the very industries that our laws are meant to regulate, the country’s most notorious polluters. He writes of how it has deceived the public by manipulating and suppressing scientific data, intimidated enforcement officials and other civil servants, and masked its agenda with Orwellian doublespeak. He reports on how the White House doles out lavish subsidies and tax breaks to the energy barons while excusing industry from providing adequate security at the more than 15,000 chemical and nuclear facilities that are prime targets for terrorist attacks. Kennedy reveals an administration whose policies have “squandered our Treasury, entangled us in foreign wars, diminished our international prestige, made us a target for terrorist attacks, and increased our reliance on petty Middle Eastern dictators who despise democracy and are hated by their own people.” Crimes Against Nature is ultimately about the corrosive effect of corporate corruption on our core American values—free-market capitalism and democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zimbabwe Trust Gang in Other Capers
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 35, Number 27, July 11, 2008 chaired by Rhodesia-born Rupert Pennant Rea, a former deputy of California Republican Congressman John Doolittle. governor of the Bank of England, and a director, along with Throughout her management of Lord Renwick’s group, Mrs. Lord Renwick, in the Rupert family Richemont group, with as- Doolittle was on the payroll of Jack Abramoff and his partners, sets in Zimbabwe and Russia. Through these holdings, Soros while Trust director Ed Stewart was Abramoff’s partner in tried to take over the vast interests of Tiny Rowland in Lonrho dirty international lobbying pursuits. Stewart ran the foreign Africa, the London and Rhodesia Mining and Land Corp. operations of House Speaker Tom DeLay’s “K Street Project” The EIR exposé on the Zimbabwe Democracy Trust as in- headquarters company, the Alexander Strategy Group, which stigator of anti-government operations was played up in the served to enrich Abramoff. Alexander Strategy has gone out of Zimbabwe press, and the Trust was then exposed in London business since DeLay was indicted, while his consigliere, newspapers. Abramoff, went to prison for hundreds of millions in fraud. In 2002, two years after founding the Zimbabwe Democ- The Abramoff gang was ideal for the task of hatching racy Trust, Lord Renwick quietly picked up the Trust from British African destabilization operations in Washington. London and moved it to Washington, D.C., where it was in- Lobbyist Abramoff himself had worked at the center of the corporated as a tax-exempt charity. The Tony Blair-Dick white South African apartheid regime’s foreign propaganda Cheney axis was in power, and perhaps it was thought that the machine (see box, “Abramoff and Africa”), while his associ- British could get their anti-Zimbabwe initiative passed off as ate, Ed Stewart, had pioneered the NED’s African schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medicare Drug War
    The Medicare Drug War: An Army of Nearly 1,000 Lobbyists Pushes a Medicare Law that Puts Drug Company and HMO Profits Ahead of Patients and Taxpayers Congress Watch June 2004 Acknowledgments The primary author of “The Medicare Drug War” was Investigative Reporter Craig Aaron. Senior Researcher Taylor Lincoln provided substantial research and technical assistance. Additional research provided by Legislative Assistant Cristina Francisco and researchers Amanda Morse, Andrea Parsons and Peter Hickey. Research Director Neal Pattison and Legislative Assistant Jessica Kutch also helped prepare this report. Congress Watch Director Frank Clemente made significant editorial contributions to this report. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a 160,000 member non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. representing consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, research and public education. Since its founding in 1971, Public Citizen has fought for consumer rights in the marketplace, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform, fair trade, clean and safe energy sources, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen has five divisions and is active in every public forum: Congress, the courts, governmental agencies and the media. Congress Watch is one of the five divisions. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 Phone: 202-546-4996 Fax: 202-547-7392 www.citizen.org ©2004 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. Price $20.00 Call Public Citizen’s Publication Office, 1-800-289-3787 for additional orders and pricing information or consult our web site at www.citizen.org. Major credit cards accepted. Or write to: Members Services Public Citizen 1600 20th Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    USCA Case #16-5138 DocumentRECORD #1657109 NO. 16 -Filed:5138 01/24/2017 Page 1 of 59 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 3, 2017 In The United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia Circuit CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant-Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIEF OF APPELLANT David L. Sobel Adam J. Rappaport LAW OFFICE OF DAVID L. SOBEL CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND 5335 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 640 ETHICS IN WASHINGTON Washington, DC 20015 455 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Floor 6 (202) 246-6180 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 408-5565 Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Appellant THE LEX GROUPDC ♦ 1825 K Street, N.W. ♦ Suite 103 ♦ Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-0001 ♦ (800) 856-4419 ♦ Fax: (202) 955-0022 ♦ www.thelexgroup.com USCA Case #16-5138 Document #1657109 Filed: 01/24/2017 Page 2 of 59 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), Appellant Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington hereby certifies as follows: A. Parties and Amici. Plaintiff-appellant is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a non-profit corporation. Defendant-appellee is the United States Department of Justice. There were no amici curiae in district court. B. Ruling Under Review. The ruling under review is the district court’s March 30, 2016 order, ECF Dkt. No. 37 (and incorporated memorandum opinion, ECF Dkt. No. 36), in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v.
    [Show full text]
  • 108Th Congress Congressional Member Organizations (Cmos)
    108th Congress Congressional Member Organizations (CMOs) All Members listed below are officers of their respective caucuses; each caucus maintains its own membership list. 2015 Caucus Rep. E. Clay Shaw (Christine Pollack - x53026) Rep. Collin Peterson (Robin Goracke - x52165) 21st Century Health Care Caucus Rep. James Greenwood (Alan Eisenberg - x54276) Rep. Patrick Kennedy (Michael Zamore - x54911) Rep. Charlie Norwood (Rodney Whitlock - x54101) Rep. Anna Eshoo (Vanessa Kramer - x58104) Addiction, Treatment and Recovery Caucus Rep. Jim Ramstad (Karin Hope - x52871) Rep. Patrick Kennedy (Rachael Bornstein - x54911) Air Force Caucus Rep. Cliff Stearns American Heritage Rivers Caucus Rep. Paul Kanjorski (Kate McMahon - x56511) Appalachian Caucus Rep. Bob Ney (Will Heaton - x56265) Army Corps Reform Caucus Rep. Earl Blumenauer (Janine Benner - x54811) Rep. Wayne Gilchrest (Andrew Smarick - x55311) Rep. Ron Kind (Ben Proctor - x55506) Rep. Thomas Tancredo (Mac Zimmerman - x57882) Rep. John Shadegg (Matthew Clark - x53361) Rep. Ellen Tauscher (John Fisher - x51880) Bipartisan Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus Rep. James Greenwood (Laura Stevens - x54276) Rep. Nancy Johnson (Jaime Cheshire - x54476) Rep. Louise Slaughter (Julia Ernst - x53615) Rep. Diana DeGette (Shannon Good - x54431) Bi-Partisan Congressional Pro-Life Caucus Rep. Christopher H. Smith (John Cusey - x57669) Rep. James Oberstar Bipartisan Congressional Refugee Caucus Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Frederick Ratliff - x53931) Rep. John Conyers (Kristen Wells - x55126) Rep. Christopher Smith (George Phillips - x53765) Rep. Zoe Lofgren (Ur Jaddou - x53072) Bipartisan Disabilities Caucus Rep. James R. Langevin (Amy Judge - x52735) Rep. Jim Ramstad (Dan Elling - x52871) Rep. Major Owens (Larry Walker - x56231) Rep. Nancy Johnson (Susan Christensen - x54476) Blue Dog Coalition Rep. Jim Turner (Elizabeth Hurley Burks - x52401) Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Times
    New York Times Jared Kushner Paid No Federal Income Tax for Years, Documents Suggest Confidential documents reviewed by The Times indicate that Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and adviser, probably paid little or no income tax from 2009 to 2016. By Jesse Drucker and Emily Flitter Oct. 13, 2018 Over the past decade, Jared Kushner’s family company has spent billions of dollars buying real estate. His personal stock investments have soared. His net worth has quintupled to almost $324 million. And yet, for several years running, Mr. Kushner — President Trump’s son-in-law and a senior White House adviser — appears to have paid almost no federal income taxes, according to confidential financial documents reviewed by The New York Times. His low tax bills are the result of a common tax-minimizing maneuver that, year after year, generated millions of dollars in losses for Mr. Kushner, according to the documents. But the losses were only on paper — Mr. Kushner and his company did not appear to actually lose any money. The losses were driven by depreciation, a tax benefit that lets real estate investors deduct a portion of the cost of their buildings from their taxable income every year. In 2015, for example, Mr. Kushner took home $1.7 million in salary and investment gains. But those earnings were swamped by $8.3 million of losses, largely because of “significant depreciation” that Mr. Kushner and his company took on their real estate, according to the documents reviewed by The Times. Nothing in the documents suggests Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper Letter FINAL Oct 10
    Cooper University Health Care Board of Trustees One Cooper Plaza Camden, New Jersey 08103 October 10, 2019 To the Board of Trustees of Cooper University Health Care: Cooper Health System is the largest employer in Camden County, offers critical access to care in the City of Camden, and provides health care delivery for the entire southern New Jersey region. If its financial soundness or its management is compromised, the health care of many is also compromised. Yet, Cooper is embroiled in yet another scandal under Board Chairman George E. Norcross III that calls into question the integrity and capacity of the leadership of Cooper and its ability to govern in a manner free from further scandal or controversy. The latest scandal over the role of Cooper’s management in the questionable purchase of the L3 property in Camden needs to be the final signal that Mr. Norcross must resign immediately from his positions with Cooper and that Governor Murphy, through his Attorney General and Commissioner of Health, must examine whether a monitor, receivership, or other forms of real oversight is appropriate and necessary to oversee the critical operations of Cooper Health. Please consider the following in recent years: • Conflicts of Interest & Patronage: In 2012, a Philadelphia Inquirer investigation “Powerful Medicine: How George Norcross Used his Political Muscle to Pump up Once-Ailing Cooper Hospital” exposed that “the hospital has become another piece of his political apparatus”; that “Norcross’ insurance business and the law firm of his brother”
    [Show full text]
  • Target San Diego
    Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government Lee Cokorinos Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government A Report for the Center on Policy Initiatives Lee Cokorinos November 2005 Table of Contents Acknowledgments . ii Foreword . iii Executive Summary . v Introduction: The National Significance of the Battle for San Diego . 1 1. The National Context: Key Organizations Leading the Right’s Assault on the States and Cities . 5 A. The American Legislative Exchange Council . 7 B. The State Policy Network . 13 C. The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy . 17 D. The Pacific Research Institute . 21 E. Americans for Tax Reform and the Project for California’s Future . 25 F. The Reason Foundation . 33 2. The Performance Institute and the Assault on San Diego . 39 3. The Battle for America’s Cities: A National Engagement . 49 Endnotes . 57 I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments This report was made possible through the generous support of the New World Foundation. Special thanks go to Colin Greer and Ann Bastian of New World for their leadership in fostering the movement for progressive renewal. Thanks also to Donald Cohen of the Center on Policy Initiatives for contributing keen insights and the benefit of his ground level experience at engaging the right at every step of the research and writing, to Murtaza Baxamusa of CPI for sharing his expertise, and to veteran political researcher Jerry Sloan for his valuable advice. Jerry’s decades of research on the California and the national right have educated a generation of activists.
    [Show full text]