4.0 ASSESSMENT METHOD Operational wind farm noise levels are predicted using: Noise emission data for the wind turbines; A 3D digital model of the site and the surrounding environment; and International standards used for the calculation of environmental sound propagation. At this preliminary stage of assessment, the primary consideration is potential A-weighted noise levels associated with operation of the wind turbines. The method selected to predict A-weighted noise levels is International Standard ISO 9613-2: 1996 Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: General method of calculation (ISO 9613-2). The prediction method is consistent with the guidance provided by the SA EPA Guideline and has been shown to provide a reliable method of predicting the typical upper A-weighted levels of the noise expected to occur in practice from wind farm developments. The ISO 9613-2 method is used in conjunction with a set of input choices and procedural modifications that are specific to wind farm noise assessment, based on international research and guidance. The noise prediction method is summarised in Table 4 with further discussion of the method and the calculation choices is provided in Appendix E. Table 4: Downwind prediction methodology
Detail Description
Software Proprietary noise modelling software SoundPLAN version 8.2
Method International Standard ISO 9613-2:1996 Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation (ISO 9613-2). Adjustments to the ISO 9613-2 method are applied on the basis of the guidance contained in the UK Institute of Acoustics publication A good practice guide to the application of ETSU-R-97 for the assessment and rating of wind turbine noise (the UK Institute of Acoustics guidance). The adjustments are applied within the SoundPLAN noise modelling software and relate to the influence of terrain screening and ground effects on sound propagation. Specific details of adjustments are noted below and are discussed in Appendix E.
Source Each wind turbine is modelled as a point source of sound. The total sound of the wind characterisation farm is then calculated based on simultaneous operation of all wind turbines and summing the contribution of each. Calculations of turbine to receiver distances and average sound propagation heights are made based on the point source being located at the position of the hub of the turbine. Calculations of terrain related screening are made based on the point source being located at the maximum tip height of each turbine. Further discussion of terrain screening effects is provided below.
Terrain data Elevation contours in 5 m resolution provided by CWPR
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 11
Detail Description
Terrain effects Adjustments for the effect of terrain are determined and applied based on the UK Institute of Acoustics guidance and research outlined in Appendix E. Valley effects: +3 dB is applied to the calculated noise level of a wind turbine when a significant valley exists between the wind turbine and calculation point. A significant valley is determined to exist when the actual mean sound propagation height between the turbine and calculation point is 50 % greater than would occur if the ground were flat. Terrain screening effects: only calculated if the terrain blocks line of sight between the maximum tip height of the turbine and the calculation point. The value of the screening effect is limited to a maximum value of 2 dB. The project is located within a hilly area characterised by variations in ground elevation between the turbines and surrounding receivers. These terrain characteristics were sufficient to trigger the application of adjustments to the predicted noise levels for some turbine/receiver combinations, equated in overall adjustments of up to +2.5 dB. For reference purposes, the ground elevations at the turbine and receiver locations are tabled in Appendix B and Appendix C respectively. The topography of the site is depicted in the elevation map provided in Appendix F.
Ground Ground factor of G = 0.5 based on the UK good practice guide and research outlined in conditions Appendix E. The ground around the site corresponds to acoustically soft conditions (G = 1) according to ISO 9613-2. The adopted value of G = 0.5 assumes that 50 % of the ground cover is acoustically hard (G = 0) to account for variations in ground porosity and provide a cautious representation of ground effects.
Atmospheric Temperature 10 oC and relative humidity 80 % conditions These represent conditions which result in relatively low levels of atmospheric sound absorption and are chosen based on the UK Institute of Acoustics guidance and the SA EPA Guideline. The calculations are based on sound speed profiles1 which increase the propagation of sound from each turbine to each receiver location, whether as a result of thermal inversions or wind directed toward each calculation point. The primary consideration for wind farm noise assessment is wind speed and direction. The noise level at each calculation point is assessed based on being simultaneously downwind of every wind turbine at the site. Other wind directions in which part or the entire wind farm is upwind of the receiver will result in lower noise levels. In some cases, it is not physically possible for a receiver to be simultaneously downwind of each turbine and the approach is therefore conservative in these instances.
Receiver heights 1.5 m above ground level This is a deviation from UK Institute of Acoustics guidance. However, the modelling also does not include the 2 dB subtraction recommended by the UK Institute of Acoustics guidance. This approach has been shown to be valid for predicting noise level of wind farms expected to be measured using the LA90 parameter (as per the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin).
1 The sound speed profile defines the rate of change in the speed of sound with increasing height above ground
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 12
5.0 WIND TURBINE NOISE ASSESSMENT 5.1 Preliminary predicted noise levels This section of the report presents the preliminary predicted A-weighted noise levels for the Jeremiah Wind Farm at surrounding receivers, together with an assessment of compliance with the base noise limit. Sound levels in environmental assessment work are typically reported to the nearest integer to reflect the practical use of measurement and prediction data. However, in the case of wind farm layout design, significant layout modifications may only give rise to fractional changes in the predicted noise level. This is a result of the relatively large number of sources influencing the total predicted noise level, as well as the typical separating distances between the turbine locations and surrounding assessment positions. It is therefore necessary to consider the predicted noise levels at a finer resolution than can be perceived or measured in practice. It is for this reason that the levels presented in this section are reported to one decimal place.
The receivers where operational wind farm noise levels are predicted to be higher than 30 dB LAeq are listed in Table 5 and Table 6 for non-associated and associated receivers, respectively. The value of 30 dB is referenced here for informative purposes. The minimum noise limit applicable to the wind farm at non-associated receivers is 35 dB LAeq. Wind farm noise levels have been predicted using the sound power level data detailed in Section 2.3 for the three (3) candidate turbine models and are summarised in Table 5 and Table 6for wind speeds which result in the highest predicted noise levels (hub height wind speed of 12 m/s for Candidate Turbine 1 and 9 m/s for Candidate Turbines 2 and 3).
Table 5: Highest predicted noise level at non-associated receivers with predicted levels over 30 dB LAeq, dB LAeq
Receiver Distance to the Candidate Turbine 1 Candidate Turbine 2 Candidate Turbine 3 nearest turbine, m
MR001 2,140 30.9 31.8 31.5
NRS005 1,889 32.1 33.0 32.7
It can be seen from Table 5 that the predicted noise levels from the proposed Jeremiah Wind Farm comply with the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin base criterion of 35 dB LAeq at all of the assessed non-associated receivers.
Table 6: Highest predicted noise level at associated receivers with predicted levels over 30 dB LAeq, dB LAeq
Receiver Distance to the Candidate Turbine 1 Candidate Turbine 2 Candidate Turbine 3 nearest turbine, m
NRS006 1,095 38.0 39.2 38.7
NRS007 1,869 34.9 35.8 35.4
PCR005 1,034 36.5 37.9 37.4
PCR007 3,710 30.1 30.1 30.0
PCR008 2,496 32.7 30.9 30.8
It can be seen from Table 6 that the predicted noise levels from the proposed Jeremiah Wind Farm are below the 45 dB LAeq reference level for all associated receivers. Predicted noise levels for each integer wind speed are tabulated in Appendix G for all considered receivers, including those where the highest predicted noise level is below 30 dB LAeq.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 13
The above findings support that the project can be designed and operated to comply with the operational noise requirements of the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin.
The location of the total predicted 30, 35, 40, and 45 dB LAeq noise contours is illustrated in Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3 for each candidate turbine model. 5.2 Low-frequency noise 5.2.1 Non-associated receivers The risk assessment provided in Appendix H indicates calculated low frequency noise levels below the applicable thresholds described in Section 2.4 for non-associated receivers. It is noted that the margin between the predicted levels and the most stringent threshold is of a comparable magnitude to the uncertainty associated with C-weighted predictions. On the basis of the above, adjustments for special noise characteristics referred to in the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin have not been applied to the predicted noise levels for non-associated receivers presented in this assessment. However, assessment of these special noise characteristics would need to be carried out as part of the post-construction compliance assessment. 5.2.2 Associated receivers The risk assessment provided in Appendix H indicates that for a small number of associated receivers, the calculated low frequency noise levels are marginally below or above the applicable thresholds. This applies in particular for NRS006 and PCR005, with Candidate Turbine Model 2 resulting in the worst case noise levels. Unlike the application of A-weighted noise limits, the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin does not specifically allow for relaxed C-weighted thresholds for receivers associated with the wind farm development. However, given the expectation that associated receivers are typically subject to land use and/or noise agreements, consideration for low frequency noise may be required to be addressed as part of these agreements, with noise levels at these locations ultimately managed in accordance with the commercial agreements established between the proponent and the landowners. Notwithstanding the above, low frequency noise should also be considered as part of the final turbine selection and during the post-construction compliance assessment.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 14
Figure 1: Highest predicted noise level contours (corresponding to hub height wind speeds of 12 m/s or greater) - Candidate Turbine 1
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 15
Figure 2: Highest predicted noise level contours (corresponding to hub height wind speeds of 9 m/s or greater) - Candidate Turbine 2
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 16
Figure 3: Highest predicted noise level contours (corresponding to hub height wind speeds of 9 m/s or greater) - Candidate Turbine 3
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 17
6.0 DETAILED ASSESSMENT PHASE A detailed assessment of a NSW wind farm development involves addressing several environmental noise considerations detailed in the project specific SEARs. Whilst project specific SEARs are yet to be issued, typical SEARs requirements include assessment of: Operational wind turbine noise; Ancillary infrastructure noise; Construction noise; Construction traffic noise; and Construction vibration. Environmental noise considerations relating to construction and ancillary infrastructure would be addressed at the development application phase of the assessment, once the project specific SEARs have been released. Further detailed assessment work may involve background noise monitoring at selected receivers to determine the applicable criteria in accordance with the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin. The results of any background noise monitoring would be documented in the noise assessment report prepared to accompany the development application for the Jeremiah Wind Farm. The NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin specifies additional criteria relating to special characteristics, defined as tonality and low frequency. While tonality cannot be readily predicted, in relation to low frequency noise, the bulletin states that: Noise assessments for proposed wind energy projects shall assess the potential for non- associated residential receiver locations to experience low frequency noise levels exceeding 60 dB(C). Low frequency noise characteristics are highly specific to the turbine being considered, and its assessment can involve detailed modelling using alternative procedures to those used for A-weighted noise levels. In accordance with the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin, this modelling data is to be provided as part of an application to develop a wind farm. Accordingly, this modelling is to be undertaken and reported at the development application phase of the assessment.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 18
7.0 SUMMARY A preliminary assessment of operational noise for the proposed Jeremiah Wind Farm has been carried out. The preliminary noise assessment has been prepared in accordance with the NSW Department of Planning and Environment’s Wind Energy: Noise Assessment Bulletin - For State significant wind energy development, dated December 2016 (the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin). The preliminary noise assessment has been carried out based on the current project design comprising sixty-five (65) multi-megawatt turbines within the wind farm site. Noise modelling was carried out based on three (3) candidate turbine models as nominated by CWPR which are typical of the size and type of turbines which are being considered for the site. While turbine manufacturer’s data has been relied on for the assessment, the turbine make and model has not been specified at this stage for commercial reasons, as requested by CWPR. The results of the modelling demonstrate that the project can be designed and operated to comply with the operational noise requirements of the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin. Once the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) are released for this project, further detailed assessment will be undertaken to support a subsequent development application. This would include background noise monitoring at selected receivers around the site, revised modelling and assessment of other noise considerations including special noise characteristics, construction and ancillary infrastructure to demonstrate how compliance with the specific noise matters defined by the SEARs for the project would be achieved.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 19
APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY The basic quantities used within this document to describe noise adopt the conventions outlined in ISO 1996-1:2016 Acoustics - Description measurement and assessment of environmental noise – Basic quantities and assessment procedures. Accordingly, all frequency weighted sound pressure levels are expressed as decibels (dB) in this report.
For example, sound pressure levels measured using an “A” frequency weighting are expressed as LA dB. Alternative ways of expressing A-weighted decibels such as dBA or dB(A) are therefore not used within this report.
Term Definition Abbreviation
A-weighting A method of adjusting sound levels to reflect the human ear’s varied See discussion sensitivity to different frequencies of sound. above this table.
C- weighting A method of adjusting sound levels to account for non-linear frequency - response of the human ear at high noise levels (typically greater than 100 decibels).
th A-weighted 90 The A-weighted pressure level that is exceeded for 90 % of a defined LA90 centile measurement period. It is used to describe the underlying background sound level in the absence of a source of sound that is being investigated, as well as the sound level of steady, or semi steady, sound sources.
A-weighted The A-weighted equivalent continuous pressure level. LAeq equivalent level
C-weighted The C-weighted equivalent continuous pressure level. LCeq equivalent level
Decibel The unit of sound level. dB
Hertz The unit for describing the frequency of a sound in terms of the number Hz of cycles per second.
Low frequency A sound with perceptible content in the audible frequency range typically - below 200 Hz
Octave Band A range of frequencies. Octave bands are referred to by their logarithmic - centre frequencies, these being 31.5 Hz, 63 Hz, 125 Hz, 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, 4 kHz, 8 kHz, and 16 kHz for the audible range of sound.
Sound power level A measure of the total sound energy emitted by a source, expressed in LW decibels.
Sound pressure A measure of the level of sound expressed in decibels. Lp level
Special A term used by the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin to define sound - characteristics characteristics that increase the likelihood of adverse reaction to the sound. The characteristics are tonality and low frequency.
Tonality A characteristic to describe sounds which are composed of distinct and - narrow groups of audible sound frequencies (e.g. whistling or humming sounds).
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 20
APPENDIX B TURBINE COORDINATES The following table sets out the coordinates of the current proposed turbine layout supplied by CWPR. Table 7: Turbine coordinates – GDA2020 / MGA Zone 55
Turbine Easting (m) Northing (m) Terrain elevation (m)
1 634,201 6,126,075 779
2 633,557 6,128,079 705
3 633,931 6,125,817 775
4 633,181 6,127,910 710
5 634,788 6,123,774 723
6 634,913 6,122,748 752
7 635,517 6,126,723 754
8 635,529 6,127,260 684
9 632,414 6,122,855 808
10 637,632 6,125,536 740
11 634,054 6,128,517 663
12 635,056 6,123,447 734
13 633,881 6,125,479 745
14 635,947 6,125,837 693
15 634,469 6,125,390 725
16 633,184 6,127,377 715
17 632,572 6,123,478 730
18 635,368 6,126,338 728
19 634,444 6,124,684 750
20 633,883 6,126,569 765
21 637,350 6,126,751 670
22 632,365 6,124,522 695
23 632,394 6,124,007 716
24 633,389 6,125,156 727
25 635,787 6,125,506 710
26 634,135 6,128,090 643
27 633,048 6,123,088 703
28 634,589 6,127,117 680
29 636,942 6,125,661 703
30 630,502 6,129,687 525
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 21
Turbine Easting (m) Northing (m) Terrain elevation (m)
31 630,294 6,127,707 570
32 634,194 6,122,880 728
33 636,300 6,127,149 650
34 630,014 6,127,170 560
35 629,324 6,129,809 524
36 630,773 6,129,397 547
37 637,624 6,126,424 678
38 630,769 6,128,718 545
39 629,418 6,129,338 526
40 629,749 6,128,789 534
41 634,592 6,123,280 750
42 636,333 6,126,798 655
43 631,039 6,128,151 529
44 636,628 6,126,232 680
45 630,990 6,127,698 533
46 628,125 6,128,146 495
47 633,029 6,124,209 634
48 633,371 6,123,495 695
49 628,251 6,128,767 475
50 629,562 6,127,591 545
51 627,294 6,128,107 455
52 630,824 6,127,306 567
53 634,430 6,127,570 623
54 634,409 6,126,373 762
55 637,706 6,125,943 702
56 622,933 6,127,849 525
57 623,988 6,128,291 554
58 624,321 6,128,658 554
59 623,198 6,128,858 537
60 623,042 6,128,539 517
61 634,783 6,125,887 795
62 633,892 6,123,240 676
63 625,053 6,127,174 410
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 22
Turbine Easting (m) Northing (m) Terrain elevation (m)
64 626,027 6,127,806 435
65 624,316 6,126,814 405
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 23
APPENDIX C RECEIVER LOCATIONS The following table sets out the ninety-four (94) noise sensitive receivers located within 8 km of the proposed project and considered in the preliminary noise assessment, together with their respective distance to the nearest turbine. Table 8: Receiver locations – GDA2020 / MGA Zone 55
Receiver ID Easting (m) Northing (m) Terrain elevation (m) Distance to the nearest turbine (m)
Associated receivers
GAR003 618,317 6,125,580 318 5,157
HR002 617,633 6,128,751 240 5,394
HR003 617,925 6,128,682 235 5,096
HR005 621,374 6,126,558 260 2,069
NRS006 631,751 6,126,747 520 1,103
NRS007 630,508 6,124,655 496 1,897
PCR002 624,746 6,123,365 457 3,478
PCR003 626,303 6,124,614 446 2,851
PCR005 627,715 6,127,177 434 1,038
PCR006 627,554 6,124,532 478 3,587
PCR007 628,721 6,123,512 527 3,723
PCR008 629,384 6,124,760 520 2,499
Non-associated receivers
AVR001 627,987 6,116,305 517 7,919
AVR002 628,041 6,116,225 517 7,955
BDR002 626,212 6,137,107 296 7,944
BDR003 627,686 6,135,871 270 6,293
BDR004 627,984 6,135,608 285 5,966
BDR005 628,482 6,136,664 265 6,920
BDR006 628,538 6,136,714 265 6,963
BDR007 628,570 6,136,752 265 6,997
BDR008 628,637 6,136,780 266 7,018
BDR009 628,746 6,136,782 267 7,009
BDR010 628,809 6,136,688 270 6,911
BDR011 631,306 6,136,972 283 7,340
BDR012 632,574 6,136,484 281 7,118
BDR014 633,653 6,136,570 282 7,581
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 24
Receiver ID Easting (m) Northing (m) Terrain elevation (m) Distance to the nearest turbine (m)
BJR025 645,502 6,125,551 444 7,818
BJR026 645,272 6,125,534 417 7,590
BJR027 644,919 6,125,637 413 7,233
BJR028 644,626 6,125,654 402 6,941
BR003 628,644 6,137,757 340 7,984
CR003 615,680 6,129,176 242 7,386
CR004 615,542 6,129,739 280 7,605
CR006 616,912 6,129,942 272 6,301
CR010 618,782 6,129,625 256 4,417
CR011 619,186 6,129,685 243 4,046
CR012 619,267 6,129,784 242 3,999
CR013 619,499 6,131,563 248 4,605
CR014 619,499 6,132,132 250 4,960
CR015 619,306 6,133,078 248 5,758
CR016 618,818 6,134,141 261 6,877
CR017 618,911 6,134,497 241 7,099
CRR006 615,783 6,124,771 266 7,795
CWR016 640,760 6,133,112 317 7,235
CWR017 640,541 6,132,876 283 6,928
CWR018 640,680 6,132,699 290 6,838
CWR019 641,024 6,132,301 303 6,677
CWR020 641,071 6,131,260 300 5,870
CWR021 641,034 6,131,067 291 5,700
CWR022 640,021 6,128,660 298 3,323
CWR023 641,092 6,131,958 304 6,434
CWR024 641,309 6,133,548 329 7,882
CWR025 639,737 6,126,935 292 2,243
CWR026 641,367 6,126,605 293 3,764
CWR028 640,060 6,128,668 304 3,356
CWR029 640,017 6,128,299 308 3,087
GAR001 616,313 6,128,004 240 6,636
GAR002 617,730 6,125,835 295 5,593
GAR004 623,182 6,119,313 585 7,587
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 25
Receiver ID Easting (m) Northing (m) Terrain elevation (m) Distance to the nearest turbine (m)
GAR010 627,647 6,116,755 518 7,755
GAR011 628,157 6,116,605 505 7,577
GAR012 628,249 6,116,653 505 7,485
GHR001 642,135 6,120,687 765 6,619
GHR002 642,192 6,120,622 766 6,706
GR021 615,454 6,127,553 244 7,498
HR001 616,316 6,128,327 240 6,649
HR004 619,410 6,127,150 256 3,617
HR006 619,081 6,128,794 274 3,988
HR008 619,914 6,130,484 248 3,693
HR009 620,041 6,133,431 257 5,574
HR010 619,976 6,133,643 259 5,785
HR011 619,563 6,135,168 245 7,296
HR012 619,808 6,135,657 240 7,611
HR013 620,796 6,136,289 256 7,822
KMR001 616,033 6,128,055 235 6,918
KMR002 615,926 6,127,909 247 7,021
KMR003 616,115 6,127,881 240 6,832
KMR004 615,936 6,127,776 250 7,010
KMR005 616,240 6,127,726 243 6,708
KMR006 616,240 6,127,616 246 6,711
KMR016 616,208 6,124,623 270 7,470
KMR017 617,122 6,123,165 298 7,473
KMR018 618,105 6,122,603 303 7,139
KMR020 615,576 6,124,977 282 7,907
MR001 631,868 6,131,326 511 2,141
NRS002 628,947 6,120,476 566 4,224
NRS004 634,309 6,133,123 562 4,621
NRS005 634,993 6,130,148 583 1,898
NRS008 629,274 6,118,912 571 5,056
NRS009 628,873 6,118,393 546 5,712
NRS010 629,073 6,118,051 538 5,867
PCR001 622,154 6,123,678 454 3,811
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 26
Receiver ID Easting (m) Northing (m) Terrain elevation (m) Distance to the nearest turbine (m)
PCR004 626,364 6,124,362 460 3,104
TR001 629,102 6,116,180 516 7,465
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 27
APPENDIX D SITE LAYOUT PLAN Figure 4: Proposed turbine locations and sensitive receiver locations
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 28
APPENDIX E NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Environmental noise levels associated with wind farms are predicted using engineering methods. The international standard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation (ISO 9613-2) has been chosen as the most appropriate method to calculate the level of broadband A-weighted wind farm noise expected to occur at surrounding receptor locations. This method is the most robust and widely used international method for the prediction of wind farm noise. The use of this standard is supported by international research publications, measurement studies conducted by Marshall Day Acoustics and direct reference to the standard in the South Australian EPA publication Wind farms environmental noise guidelines, NZS 6808:2010 Acoustics – Wind farm noise and AS 4959:2010 Acoustics – Measurement, prediction and assessment of noise from wind turbine generators. The standard specifies an engineering method for calculating noise at a known distance from a variety of sources under meteorological conditions favourable to sound propagation. The standard defines favourable conditions as downwind propagation where the source blows from the source to the receiver within an angle of ±45 degrees from a line connecting the source to the receiver, at wind speeds between approximately 1 m/s and 5 m/s, measured at a height of 3 m to 11 m above the ground. Equivalently, the method accounts for average propagation under a well-developed moderate ground based thermal inversion. In this respect, it is noted that at the wind speeds relevant to noise emissions from wind turbines, atmospheric conditions do not favour the development of thermal inversions throughout the propagation path from the source to the receiver. To calculate far-field noise levels according to the ISO 9613-2, the noise emissions of each turbine are firstly characterised in the form of octave band frequency levels. A series of octave band attenuation factors are then calculated for a range of effects including: Geometric divergence; Air absorption; Reflecting obstacles; Screening; Vegetation; and Ground reflections. The octave band attenuation factors are then applied to the noise emission data to determine the corresponding octave band and total calculated noise level at receiver locations. Calculating the attenuation factors for each effect requires a relevant description of the environment into which the sound propagation such as the physical dimensions of the environment, atmospheric conditions and the characteristics of the ground between the source and the receiver. Wind farm noise propagation has been the subject of considerable research in recent years. These studies have provided support for the reliability of engineering methods such as ISO 9613-2 when a certain set of input parameters are chosen in combination. Specifically, the studies to date tend to support that the assignment of a ground absorption factor of G = 0.5 for the source, middle and receiver ground regions between a wind farm and a calculation point tends to provide a reliable representation of the upper noise levels expected in practice, when modelled in combination with other key assumptions; specifically all turbines operating at identical wind speeds, emitting sound levels equal to the test measured levels plus a margin for uncertainty (or guaranteed values), at a temperature of 10 oC and relative humidity of 70 % to 80 %, with specific adjustments for screening and ground effects as a result of the ground terrain profile.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 29
In support of the use of ISO 9613-2 and the choice of G = 0.5 as an appropriate ground characterisation, the following references are noted: A factor of G = 0.5 is frequently applied in Australia for general environmental noise modelling purposes as a way of accounting for the potential mix of ground porosity which may occur in regions of dry/compacted soils or in regions where persistent damp conditions may be relevant In 1998, a comprehensive study (commonly cited as the Joule Report), part funded by the European Commission found that the ISO 9613-2 model provided a robust representation of upper noise levels which may occur in practice, and provided a closer agreement between predicted and measured noise levels than alternative standards such as CONCAWE and ENM. Specifically, the report indicated the ISO 9613 method generally tends to marginally over predict noise levels expected in practice. The UK Institute of Acoustics journal dated March/April 2009 published a joint agreement between practitioners in the field of wind farm noise assessment (the UK IOA 2009 joint agreement), including consultants routinely employed on behalf of both developers and community opposition groups, and indicated the ISO 9613-2 method as the appropriate standard and specifically designated G = 0.5 as the appropriate ground characterisation. This agreement was subsequently reflected in the recommendations detailed in the UK Institute of Acoustics publication A good practice guide to the application of ETSU-R-97 for the assessment and rating of wind turbine noise (UK Institute of Acoustics guidance). It is noted that these publications refer to predictions made at receiver heights of 4 m. Predictions in Australia are generally based on a lower prediction height of 1.5 m which tends to result in higher ground attenuation for a given ground factor, however conversely, predictions in Australia do not generally incorporate a -2 dB factor (as applied in the UK) to represent the relationship between LAeq and LA90 noise levels. The result is that these differences tend to balance out to a comparable approach and thus supports the use of G = 0.5 in the context of Australian prediction methodologies. A range of measurement and prediction studies2, 3, 4 for wind farms in which Marshall Day Acoustics’ staff have been involved in have provided further support for the use of ISO 9613-2 and G = 0.5 as an appropriate representation of typical upper noise levels expected to occur in practice. The findings of these studies demonstrate the suitability of the ISO 9613 method to predict the propagation of wind turbine noise for: the types of noise source heights associated with a modern wind farm, extending the scope of application of the method beyond the 30 m maximum source heights considered in the original ISO 9613-2; the types of environments in which wind farms are typically developed, and the range of atmospheric conditions and wind speeds typically observed around wind farm sites. Importantly, this supports the extended scope of application to wind speeds in excess of 5 m/s.
2 Bullmore, Adcock, Jiggins & Cand – Wind Farm Noise Predictions: The Risks of Conservatism; Presented at the Second International Meeting on Wind Turbine Noise in Lyon, France September 2007. 3 Bullmore, Adcock, Jiggins & Cand – Wind Farm Noise Predictions and Comparisons with Measurements; Presented at the Third International Meeting on Wind Turbine Noise in Aalborg, Denmark June 2009. 4 Delaire, Griffin, & Walsh – Comparison of predicted wind farm noise emission and measured post-construction noise levels at the Portland Wind Energy Project in Victoria, Australia; Presented at the Fourth International Meeting on Wind Turbine Noise in Rome, April 2011.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 30
In addition to the choice of ground factor referred to above, adjustments to the ISO 9613-2 standard for screening and valleys effects are applied based on recommendations of the Joule Report, UK IOA 2009 joint agreement and the UK IOA Good Practice Guide. The following adjustments are applied to the calculations: screening effects as a result of terrain are limited to 2 dB screening effects are assessed based on each turbine being represented by a single noise source located at the maximum tip height of the turbine rotor an adjustment of 3 dB is added to the predicted noise contribution of a turbine if the terrain between the turbine and receiver in question is characterised by a significant valley. A significant valley is defined as a situation where the mean sound propagation height is at least 50 % greater than it would be otherwise over flat ground. The adjustments detailed above are implemented in the wind turbine calculation procedure of the SoundPLAN 8.2 software used to conduct the noise modelling. The software uses these definitions in conjunction with the digital terrain model of the site to evaluate the path between each turbine and receiver pairing and then subsequently applies the adjustments to each turbine’s predicted noise contribution where appropriate.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 31
APPENDIX F SITE TOPOGRAPHY Figure 5: Terrain elevation map for the Jeremiah Wind Farm project and surrounding area
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 32
APPENDIX G TABULATED PREDICTED NOISE LEVEL DATA
Table 9: Predicted noise levels, dB LAeq - Candidate Turbine 1
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
Associated receivers
GAR003 10.8 13.8 16.7 19.4 20.5 20.5
HR002 9.4 12.4 15.3 18.0 19.1 19.1
HR003 9.8 12.8 15.7 18.4 19.5 19.5
HR005 18.3 21.3 24.2 26.9 28.0 28.0
NRS006 28.3 31.3 34.2 36.9 38.0 38.0
NRS007 25.2 28.2 31.1 33.8 34.9 34.9
PCR002 17.2 20.2 23.1 25.8 26.9 26.9
PCR003 19.3 22.3 25.2 27.9 29.0 29.0
PCR005 26.8 29.8 32.7 35.4 36.5 36.5
PCR006 19.7 22.7 25.6 28.3 29.4 29.4
PCR007 20.4 23.4 26.3 29.0 30.1 30.1
PCR008 23.0 26.0 28.9 31.6 32.7 32.7
Non-associated receivers
AVR001 9.3 12.3 15.2 17.9 19.0 19.0
AVR002 9.2 12.2 15.1 17.8 18.9 18.9
BDR002 8.3 11.3 14.2 16.9 18.0 18.0
BDR003 9.7 12.7 15.6 18.3 19.4 19.4
BDR004 10.1 13.1 16.0 18.7 19.8 19.8
BDR005 8.9 11.9 14.8 17.5 18.6 18.6
BDR006 8.9 11.9 14.8 17.5 18.6 18.6
BDR007 8.8 11.8 14.7 17.4 18.5 18.5
BDR008 8.8 11.8 14.7 17.4 18.5 18.5
BDR009 8.9 11.9 14.8 17.5 18.6 18.6
BDR010 9.0 12.0 14.9 17.6 18.7 18.7
BDR011 8.9 11.9 14.8 17.5 18.6 18.6
BDR012 9.4 12.4 15.3 18.0 19.1 19.1
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 33
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
BDR014 9.1 12.1 15.0 17.7 18.8 18.8
BJR025 9.8 12.8 15.7 18.4 19.5 19.5
BJR026 10.7 13.7 16.6 19.3 20.4 20.4
BJR027 10.4 13.4 16.3 19.0 20.1 20.1
BJR028 11.9 14.9 17.8 20.5 21.6 21.6
BR003 9.9 12.9 15.8 18.5 19.6 19.6
CR003 7.5 10.5 13.4 16.1 17.2 17.2
CR004 8.3 11.3 14.2 16.9 18.0 18.0
CR006 10.0 13.0 15.9 18.6 19.7 19.7
CR010 11.2 14.2 17.1 19.8 20.9 20.9
CR011 12.0 15.0 17.9 20.6 21.7 21.7
CR012 12.1 15.1 18.0 20.7 21.8 21.8
CR013 10.7 13.7 16.6 19.3 20.4 20.4
CR014 10.0 13.0 15.9 18.6 19.7 19.7
CR015 8.8 11.8 14.7 17.4 18.5 18.5
CR016 8.6 11.6 14.5 17.2 18.3 18.3
CR017 7.4 10.4 13.3 16.0 17.1 17.1
CRR006 6.8 9.8 12.7 15.4 16.5 16.5
CWR016 10.1 13.1 16.0 18.7 19.8 19.8
CWR017 9.8 12.8 15.7 18.4 19.5 19.5
CWR018 10.0 13.0 15.9 18.6 19.7 19.7
CWR019 10.7 13.7 16.6 19.3 20.4 20.4
CWR020 11.8 14.8 17.7 20.4 21.5 21.5
CWR021 12.1 15.1 18.0 20.7 21.8 21.8
CWR022 16.3 19.3 22.2 24.9 26.0 26.0
CWR023 11.1 14.1 17.0 19.7 20.8 20.8
CWR024 10.5 13.5 16.4 19.1 20.2 20.2
CWR025 18.6 21.6 24.5 27.2 28.3 28.3
CWR026 15.9 18.9 21.8 24.5 25.6 25.6
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 34
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
CWR028 16.2 19.2 22.1 24.8 25.9 25.9
CWR029 16.9 19.9 22.8 25.5 26.6 26.6
GAR001 8.1 11.1 14.0 16.7 17.8 17.8
GAR002 10.0 13.0 15.9 18.6 19.7 19.7
GAR004 11.2 14.2 17.1 19.8 20.9 20.9
GAR010 9.1 12.1 15.0 17.7 18.8 18.8
GAR011 9.5 12.5 15.4 18.1 19.2 19.2
GAR012 9.4 12.4 15.3 18.0 19.1 19.1
GHR001 12.4 15.4 18.3 21.0 22.1 22.1
GHR002 12.2 15.2 18.1 20.8 21.9 21.9
GR021 6.2 9.2 12.1 14.8 15.9 15.9
HR001 8.1 11.1 14.0 16.7 17.8 17.8
HR004 12.2 15.2 18.1 20.8 21.9 21.9
HR006 11.7 14.7 17.6 20.3 21.4 21.4
HR008 12.8 15.8 18.7 21.4 22.5 22.5
HR009 8.9 11.9 14.8 17.5 18.6 18.6
HR010 8.7 11.7 14.6 17.3 18.4 18.4
HR011 7.0 10.0 12.9 15.6 16.7 16.7
HR012 6.4 9.4 12.3 15.0 16.1 16.1
HR013 6.1 9.1 12.0 14.7 15.8 15.8
KMR001 8.0 11.0 13.9 16.6 17.7 17.7
KMR002 7.9 10.9 13.8 16.5 17.6 17.6
KMR003 7.7 10.7 13.6 16.3 17.4 17.4
KMR004 8.5 11.5 14.4 17.1 18.2 18.2
KMR005 7.7 10.7 13.6 16.3 17.4 17.4
KMR006 8.4 11.4 14.3 17.0 18.1 18.1
KMR016 7.1 10.1 13.0 15.7 16.8 16.8
KMR017 6.9 9.9 12.8 15.5 16.6 16.6
KMR018 7.3 10.3 13.2 15.9 17.0 17.0
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 35
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
KMR020 7.0 10.0 12.9 15.6 16.7 16.7
MR001 21.2 24.2 27.1 29.8 30.9 30.9
NRS002 16.6 19.6 22.5 25.2 26.3 26.3
NRS004 15.2 18.2 21.1 23.8 24.9 24.9
NRS005 22.4 25.4 28.3 31.0 32.1 32.1
NRS008 12.7 15.7 18.6 21.3 22.4 22.4
NRS009 11.7 14.7 17.6 20.3 21.4 21.4
NRS010 10.8 13.8 16.7 19.4 20.5 20.5
PCR001 16.2 19.2 22.1 24.8 25.9 25.9
PCR004 19.2 22.2 25.1 27.8 28.9 28.9
TR001 8.6 11.6 14.5 17.2 18.3 18.3
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 36
Table 10: Predicted noise levels, dB LAeq - Candidate Turbine 2
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
Associated receivers
GAR003 9.9 13.0 16.4 19.3 21.4 21.4
HR002 8.5 11.6 15.0 17.9 20.0 20.0
HR003 8.8 11.9 15.3 18.2 20.3 20.3
HR005 17.4 20.5 23.9 26.8 28.9 28.9
NRS006 27.7 30.8 34.2 37.1 39.2 39.2
NRS007 24.3 27.4 30.8 33.7 35.8 35.8
PCR002 16.2 19.3 22.7 25.6 27.7 27.7
PCR003 18.3 21.4 24.8 27.7 29.8 29.8
PCR005 26.4 29.5 32.9 35.8 37.9 37.9
PCR006 18.6 21.7 25.1 28.0 30.1 30.1
PCR007 19.4 22.5 25.9 28.8 30.9 30.9
PCR008 22.0 25.1 28.5 31.4 33.5 33.5
Non-associated receivers
AVR001 8.4 11.5 14.9 17.8 19.9 19.9
AVR002 8.3 11.4 14.8 17.7 19.8 19.8
BDR002 7.4 10.5 13.9 16.8 18.9 18.9
BDR003 8.8 11.9 15.3 18.2 20.3 20.3
BDR004 9.2 12.3 15.7 18.6 20.7 20.7
BDR005 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
BDR006 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
BDR007 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
BDR008 7.9 11.0 14.4 17.3 19.4 19.4
BDR009 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
BDR010 8.1 11.2 14.6 17.5 19.6 19.6
BDR011 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
BDR012 8.5 11.6 15.0 17.9 20.0 20.0
BDR014 8.2 11.3 14.7 17.6 19.7 19.7
BJR025 9.0 12.1 15.5 18.4 20.5 20.5
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 37
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
BJR026 9.9 13.0 16.4 19.3 21.4 21.4
BJR027 9.4 12.5 15.9 18.8 20.9 20.9
BJR028 11.0 14.1 17.5 20.4 22.5 22.5
BR003 9.0 12.1 15.5 18.4 20.5 20.5
CR003 6.7 9.8 13.2 16.1 18.2 18.2
CR004 7.4 10.5 13.9 16.8 18.9 18.9
CR006 9.0 12.1 15.5 18.4 20.5 20.5
CR010 10.2 13.3 16.7 19.6 21.7 21.7
CR011 11.0 14.1 17.5 20.4 22.5 22.5
CR012 11.1 14.2 17.6 20.5 22.6 22.6
CR013 10.9 14.0 17.4 20.3 22.4 22.4
CR014 9.0 12.1 15.5 18.4 20.5 20.5
CR015 7.9 11.0 14.4 17.3 19.4 19.4
CR016 7.7 10.8 14.2 17.1 19.2 19.2
CR017 6.6 9.7 13.1 16.0 18.1 18.1
CRR006 6.0 9.1 12.5 15.4 17.5 17.5
CWR016 9.1 12.2 15.6 18.5 20.6 20.6
CWR017 8.8 11.9 15.3 18.2 20.3 20.3
CWR018 9.0 12.1 15.5 18.4 20.5 20.5
CWR019 9.7 12.8 16.2 19.1 21.2 21.2
CWR020 10.8 13.9 17.3 20.2 22.3 22.3
CWR021 11.1 14.2 17.6 20.5 22.6 22.6
CWR022 15.2 18.3 21.7 24.6 26.7 26.7
CWR023 10.0 13.1 16.5 19.4 21.5 21.5
CWR024 9.4 12.5 15.9 18.8 20.9 20.9
CWR025 17.7 20.8 24.2 27.1 29.2 29.2
CWR026 14.9 18.0 21.4 24.3 26.4 26.4
CWR028 15.1 18.2 21.6 24.5 26.6 26.6
CWR029 15.8 18.9 22.3 25.2 27.3 27.3
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 38
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
GAR001 7.3 10.4 13.8 16.7 18.8 18.8
GAR002 9.1 12.2 15.6 18.5 20.6 20.6
GAR004 10.3 13.4 16.8 19.7 21.8 21.8
GAR010 8.2 11.3 14.7 17.6 19.7 19.7
GAR011 8.6 11.7 15.1 18.0 20.1 20.1
GAR012 8.6 11.7 15.1 18.0 20.1 20.1
GHR001 11.5 14.6 18.0 20.9 23.0 23.0
GHR002 11.4 14.5 17.9 20.8 22.9 22.9
GR021 5.4 8.5 11.9 14.8 16.9 16.9
HR001 7.3 10.4 13.8 16.7 18.8 18.8
HR004 11.2 14.3 17.7 20.6 22.7 22.7
HR006 10.7 13.8 17.2 20.1 22.2 22.2
HR008 11.7 14.8 18.2 21.1 23.2 23.2
HR009 7.9 11.0 14.4 17.3 19.4 19.4
HR010 7.8 10.9 14.3 17.2 19.3 19.3
HR011 6.0 9.1 12.5 15.4 17.5 17.5
HR012 5.6 8.7 12.1 15.0 17.1 17.1
HR013 5.4 8.5 11.9 14.8 16.9 16.9
KMR001 7.1 10.2 13.6 16.5 18.6 18.6
KMR002 7.4 10.5 13.9 16.8 18.9 18.9
KMR003 6.7 9.8 13.2 16.1 18.2 18.2
KMR004 7.7 10.8 14.2 17.1 19.2 19.2
KMR005 6.9 10.0 13.4 16.3 18.4 18.4
KMR006 7.5 10.6 14.0 16.9 19.0 19.0
KMR016 6.3 9.4 12.8 15.7 17.8 17.8
KMR017 6.1 9.2 12.6 15.5 17.6 17.6
KMR018 6.5 9.6 13.0 15.9 18.0 18.0
KMR020 6.3 9.4 12.8 15.7 17.8 17.8
MR001 20.3 23.4 26.8 29.7 31.8 31.8
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 39
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
NRS002 15.5 18.6 22.0 24.9 27.0 27.0
NRS004 14.1 17.2 20.6 23.5 25.6 25.6
NRS005 21.5 24.6 28.0 30.9 33.0 33.0
NRS008 11.7 14.8 18.2 21.1 23.2 23.2
NRS009 10.7 13.8 17.2 20.1 22.2 22.2
NRS010 9.8 12.9 16.3 19.2 21.3 21.3
PCR001 15.2 18.3 21.7 24.6 26.7 26.7
PCR004 18.2 21.3 24.7 27.6 29.7 29.7
TR001 7.7 10.8 14.2 17.1 19.2 19.2
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 40
Table 11: Predicted noise levels, dB LAeq - Candidate Turbine 3
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
Associated receivers
GAR003 10.1 13.2 16.6 19.5 21.6 21.6
HR002 8.6 11.7 15.1 18.0 20.1 20.1
HR003 9.0 12.1 15.5 18.4 20.5 20.5
HR005 17.1 20.2 23.6 26.5 28.6 28.6
NRS006 27.2 30.3 33.7 36.6 38.7 38.7
NRS007 23.9 27.0 30.4 33.3 35.4 35.4
PCR002 16.2 19.3 22.7 25.6 27.7 27.7
PCR003 18.2 21.3 24.7 27.6 29.7 29.7
PCR005 25.9 29.0 32.4 35.3 37.4 37.4
PCR006 18.5 21.6 25.0 27.9 30.0 30.0
PCR007 19.3 22.4 25.8 28.7 30.8 30.8
PCR008 21.8 24.9 28.3 31.2 33.3 33.3
Non-associated receivers
AVR001 8.8 11.9 15.3 18.2 20.3 20.3
AVR002 8.6 11.7 15.1 18.0 20.1 20.1
BDR002 7.8 10.9 14.3 17.2 19.3 19.3
BDR003 9.0 12.1 15.5 18.4 20.5 20.5
BDR004 9.4 12.5 15.9 18.8 20.9 20.9
BDR005 8.3 11.4 14.8 17.7 19.8 19.8
BDR006 8.3 11.4 14.8 17.7 19.8 19.8
BDR007 8.3 11.4 14.8 17.7 19.8 19.8
BDR008 8.2 11.3 14.7 17.6 19.7 19.7
BDR009 8.3 11.4 14.8 17.7 19.8 19.8
BDR010 8.4 11.5 14.9 17.8 19.9 19.9
BDR011 8.3 11.4 14.8 17.7 19.8 19.8
BDR012 8.8 11.9 15.3 18.2 20.3 20.3
BDR014 8.5 11.6 15.0 17.9 20.0 20.0
BJR025 9.3 12.4 15.8 18.7 20.8 20.8
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 41
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
BJR026 10.1 13.2 16.6 19.5 21.6 21.6
BJR027 9.7 12.8 16.2 19.1 21.2 21.2
BJR028 11.2 14.3 17.7 20.6 22.7 22.7
BR003 9.4 12.5 15.9 18.8 20.9 20.9
CR003 7.0 10.1 13.5 16.4 18.5 18.5
CR004 7.7 10.8 14.2 17.1 19.2 19.2
CR006 9.2 12.3 15.7 18.6 20.7 20.7
CR010 10.2 13.3 16.7 19.6 21.7 21.7
CR011 10.9 14.0 17.4 20.3 22.4 22.4
CR012 11.0 14.1 17.5 20.4 22.5 22.5
CR013 10.3 13.4 16.8 19.7 21.8 21.8
CR014 9.1 12.2 15.6 18.5 20.6 20.6
CR015 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
CR016 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
CR017 6.8 9.9 13.3 16.2 18.3 18.3
CRR006 6.3 9.4 12.8 15.7 17.8 17.8
CWR016 9.5 12.6 16.0 18.9 21.0 21.0
CWR017 9.1 12.2 15.6 18.5 20.6 20.6
CWR018 9.3 12.4 15.8 18.7 20.8 20.8
CWR019 10.0 13.1 16.5 19.4 21.5 21.5
CWR020 11.0 14.1 17.5 20.4 22.5 22.5
CWR021 11.2 14.3 17.7 20.6 22.7 22.7
CWR022 15.1 18.2 21.6 24.5 26.6 26.6
CWR023 10.3 13.4 16.8 19.7 21.8 21.8
CWR024 9.9 13.0 16.4 19.3 21.4 21.4
CWR025 17.4 20.5 23.9 26.8 28.9 28.9
CWR026 14.8 17.9 21.3 24.2 26.3 26.3
CWR028 15.0 18.1 21.5 24.4 26.5 26.5
CWR029 15.7 18.8 22.2 25.1 27.2 27.2
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 42
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
GAR001 7.6 10.7 14.1 17.0 19.1 19.1
GAR002 9.3 12.4 15.8 18.7 20.8 20.8
GAR004 10.7 13.8 17.2 20.1 22.2 22.2
GAR010 8.6 11.7 15.1 18.0 20.1 20.1
GAR011 8.9 12.0 15.4 18.3 20.4 20.4
GAR012 8.9 12.0 15.4 18.3 20.4 20.4
GHR001 11.7 14.8 18.2 21.1 23.2 23.2
GHR002 11.5 14.6 18.0 20.9 23.0 23.0
GR021 5.7 8.8 12.2 15.1 17.2 17.2
HR001 7.5 10.6 14.0 16.9 19.0 19.0
HR004 11.2 14.3 17.7 20.6 22.7 22.7
HR006 10.7 13.8 17.2 20.1 22.2 22.2
HR008 11.7 14.8 18.2 21.1 23.2 23.2
HR009 8.1 11.2 14.6 17.5 19.6 19.6
HR010 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
HR011 6.4 9.5 12.9 15.8 17.9 17.9
HR012 5.9 9.0 12.4 15.3 17.4 17.4
HR013 5.7 8.8 12.2 15.1 17.2 17.2
KMR001 7.4 10.5 13.9 16.8 18.9 18.9
KMR002 7.7 10.8 14.2 17.1 19.2 19.2
KMR003 7.1 10.2 13.6 16.5 18.6 18.6
KMR004 8.0 11.1 14.5 17.4 19.5 19.5
KMR005 7.1 10.2 13.6 16.5 18.6 18.6
KMR006 7.8 10.9 14.3 17.2 19.3 19.3
KMR016 6.6 9.7 13.1 16.0 18.1 18.1
KMR017 6.4 9.5 12.9 15.8 17.9 17.9
KMR018 6.8 9.9 13.3 16.2 18.3 18.3
KMR020 6.6 9.7 13.1 16.0 18.1 18.1
MR001 20.0 23.1 26.5 29.4 31.5 31.5
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 43
Receiver Hub-height wind speed (m/s)
5 6 7 8 9 ≥10
NRS002 15.6 18.7 22.1 25.0 27.1 27.1
NRS004 14.2 17.3 20.7 23.6 25.7 25.7
NRS005 21.2 24.3 27.7 30.6 32.7 32.7
NRS008 11.9 15.0 18.4 21.3 23.4 23.4
NRS009 11.0 14.1 17.5 20.4 22.5 22.5
NRS010 10.1 13.2 16.6 19.5 21.6 21.6
PCR001 15.3 18.4 21.8 24.7 26.8 26.8
PCR004 18.0 21.1 24.5 27.4 29.5 29.5
TR001 8.1 11.2 14.6 17.5 19.6 19.6
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 44
APPENDIX H C-WEIGHTING ASSESSMENT RESULTS H1 Introduction Presented below are details of the risk assessment carried out for the purpose of gauging whether penalties for low frequency, as detailed in the NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin, may be applicable. H2 Assessment requirement The following excerpt concerning C-weighted wind turbine noise have been reproduced from NSW Noise Assessment Bulletin. Low Frequency Noise The presence of excessive low frequency noise (a special noise characteristic) [ie noise from the wind farm that is repeatedly greater than 65 dBC during day time or 60 dBC during the night-time at any relevant receiver] will incur a 5 dB(A) penalty, to be added to the measured noise level for the wind farm, unless a detailed internal low frequency noise assessment demonstrates compliance with the proposed criteria for the assessment of low frequency noise disturbance (UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA, 2005) for a steady noise source. H3 Prediction method As stated in Section 2.4, there are no commonly used, practical methods to accurately predict the wind turbine low frequency noise levels at receptor locations. In this case, the C-weighted noise levels at receivers have been estimated using a simplified approach based on the same noise modelling methods as described above for A-weighted levels, but with the following modifications: The range of band frequencies has been expanded to include bands down to the 12.5 Hz frequency band The ground absorption parameter has been set to G = 0 (hard ground) to account for the increased influence of ground reflections at low frequencies. C-weighted noise levels have been predicted for the worst-case wind speed in terms of C-weighted levels (12 m/s for Candidate Turbine 1 and 9 m/s for Candidate Turbines 2 and 3). H4 Results Table 12 presents the results of the preliminary C-weighted noise predictions.
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 45
Table 12: Predicted C-weighted noise levels, dB LCeq
Receiver ID Candidate Turbine 1 Candidate Turbine 2 Candidate Turbine 3
Associated receivers
GAR003 45.7 48.1 46.4
HR002 45.1 47.6 45.8
HR003 45.3 47.7 46.0
HR005 50.3 52.5 51.0
NRS006 58.4 60.6 59.1
NRS007 55.9 58.1 56.7
PCR002 50.9 53.4 51.6
PCR003 52.2 54.6 53.0
PCR005 56.9 59.1 57.6
PCR006 52.5 54.9 53.3
PCR007 53.1 55.5 53.8
PCR008 54.7 57.0 55.5
Non-associated receivers
AVR001 45.9 48.3 46.6
AVR002 45.8 48.3 46.5
BDR002 45.1 47.5 45.7
BDR003 46.0 48.4 46.6
BDR004 46.2 48.7 46.9
BDR005 45.5 48.0 46.2
BDR006 45.5 47.9 46.2
BDR007 45.5 47.9 46.1
BDR008 45.5 47.9 46.1
BDR009 45.5 47.9 46.1
BDR010 45.5 48.0 46.2
BDR011 45.5 48.0 46.2
BDR012 45.9 48.3 46.6
BDR014 45.7 48.2 46.4
BJR025 45.5 47.9 46.1
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 46
Receiver ID Candidate Turbine 1 Candidate Turbine 2 Candidate Turbine 3
BJR026 46.2 48.7 46.9
BJR027 45.8 48.3 46.5
BJR028 47.0 49.5 47.7
BR003 46.4 48.9 47.1
CR003 43.8 46.3 44.4
CR004 44.0 46.5 44.7
CR006 45.0 47.5 45.7
CR010 46.1 48.5 46.7
CR011 46.5 48.8 47.1
CR012 46.5 48.9 47.2
CR013 45.8 48.6 46.7
CR014 45.5 47.9 46.2
CR015 44.9 47.3 45.6
CR016 44.5 47.0 45.2
CR017 44.0 46.5 44.6
CRR006 43.1 45.6 43.8
CWR016 46.4 48.8 47.1
CWR017 46.0 48.5 46.7
CWR018 46.2 48.6 46.9
CWR019 46.6 49.0 47.3
CWR020 47.2 49.6 47.9
CWR021 47.4 49.8 48.1
CWR022 49.8 52.1 50.5
CWR023 46.8 49.2 47.5
CWR024 46.7 49.0 47.4
CWR025 51.0 53.2 51.7
CWR026 49.3 51.7 50.1
CWR028 49.7 52.0 50.4
CWR029 50.1 52.4 50.8
GAR001 44.6 47.1 45.2
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 47
Receiver ID Candidate Turbine 1 Candidate Turbine 2 Candidate Turbine 3
GAR002 45.2 47.7 45.9
GAR004 46.8 49.2 47.5
GAR010 45.7 48.1 46.3
GAR011 46.0 48.4 46.7
GAR012 45.9 48.4 46.6
GHR001 47.8 50.3 48.5
GHR002 47.7 50.2 48.4
GR021 42.8 45.3 43.5
HR001 44.6 47.0 45.2
HR004 46.6 49.0 47.2
HR006 46.2 48.6 46.9
HR008 46.9 49.2 47.6
HR009 44.9 47.4 45.6
HR010 44.9 47.3 45.6
HR011 43.9 46.3 44.5
HR012 43.6 46.0 44.2
HR013 43.4 45.9 44.1
KMR001 44.5 47.0 45.2
KMR002 44.5 47.1 45.3
KMR003 44.1 46.5 44.8
KMR004 44.9 47.4 45.6
KMR005 44.1 46.6 44.8
KMR006 44.5 46.9 45.1
KMR016 43.4 45.9 44.0
KMR017 43.5 46.0 44.1
KMR018 43.9 46.4 44.6
KMR020 43.3 45.8 43.9
MR001 53.5 55.8 54.2
NRS002 50.5 52.9 51.2
NRS004 49.6 52.1 50.4
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 48
Receiver ID Candidate Turbine 1 Candidate Turbine 2 Candidate Turbine 3
NRS005 54.2 56.4 54.9
NRS008 47.8 50.2 48.5
NRS009 47.3 49.6 47.9
NRS010 46.7 49.2 47.4
PCR001 50.0 52.4 50.7
PCR004 52.2 54.5 52.9
TR001 45.3 47.8 46.0
Rp 001 20200782 - Jeremiah Wind Farm - Preliminary Noise Assessment.docx 49
Preliminary Visual Impact Assessment
C Jeremiah Wind Farm 11/06/21 Preliminary Visual Impact Assessment Jeremiah Wind Farm
Prepared for: CWP Renewables
Project No: 1935 Issue: FINAL FOR SUBMISSION Date: 01 June 2021 DOCUMENT HISTORY AND STATUS Project No: 1935 Project Name: Jeremiah Wind Farm Preliminary Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
Issue Submission Date of Issue Author Approved by A DRAFT IN PROGRESS 02.02.2021 AR DM
B DRAFT FOR REVIEW 26.04.2021 AR DM
C FINAL FOR SUBMISSION 11.05.2021 MC AR
D FINAL FOR SUBMISSION 14.05.2021 MED AR Moir Landscape Architecture Pty Ltd, FINAL FOR SUBMISSION E 01.06.2021 MED AR Studio 1, 88 Fern Street, PO Box 111, Islington NSW 2296 Ph.(02) 4965 3500 Fax.(02) 4965 3555 [email protected] www.moirla.com.au ACN: 097 558 908 ABN: 48 097 558 908 Contents
1.0 Introduction References
1.1 Introduction Page 4 Appendix A Preliminary Assessment Tools
1.2 Relevant Experience Page 5 Appendix B Preliminary Viewpoint Assessment
2.0 Study Method Appendix C Preliminary Dwelling Assessment Page 6 2.1 Study Method Appendix D Community Consultation Questionnaire
2.2 Wind Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin Page 6
2.3 Report Structure Page 6
3.0 Project Overview
3.1 The Proposed Development Page 7
4.0 Community Consultation
4.1 Overview of Community Consultation Process Page 9
4.2 Community Perception Page 9
4.3 Landscape Values Page 10
4.4 Key Features and Areas of Scenic Quality Page 10
4.5 Key Public Viewpoints Page 10
5.0 Visual Baseline Study
5.1 Overview of Bio-region Page 11
5.2 Land Use Page 11
5.3 Key Landscape Features Page 13
5.4 Landscape Character Types Page 14
5.5 Key Viewpoints Page 14
6.0 Preliminary Assessment Tools
6.1 Preliminary Assessment Tools Page 18
6.2 Preliminary Assessment Tool 1: Visual Magnitude Page 18
6.3 Results of Preliminary Visual Magnitude Assessment Page 20
6.4 Preliminary Assessment Tool 2: Multiple Wind Turbine Tool Page 21
6.5 Results of Preliminary Multiple Wind Turbine Tool Assessment Page 21
7.0 Preliminary Zone of Visual Influence
7.1 Preliminary Zone of Visual Influence Page 23
8.0 Summary
8.1 Summary of the Preliminary VIA Page 25
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 3 1.0 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
Moir Landscape Architecture have been commissioned by CWP Renewables Pty Ltd to prepare a Preliminary Visual Impact Assessment (PVIA) for the proposed Jeremiah Wind Farm (the Project). This PVIA has been The purpose of this PVIA is to provide a preliminary assessment of the potential visual impacts of the prepared to meet the proposed Jeremiah Wind Farm. requirements of ‘Stage 1’ of the Visual Assessment This PVIA has been prepared in accordance with the Wind Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin Process as per the Wind December 2016. The visual assessment process is broken into two main stages (see Figure 1): Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin. Phase 1: Preliminary Environmental Assessment and Phase 2: EIS
This PVIA forms apart of Phase 1: Preliminary Environmental Assessment to be submitted to DPIE together with the Scoping Report for the request for the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs).
The requirements of Stage 1: Preliminary Environmental Assessment are as follows:
At the Preliminary Environmental Assessment stage, a process consisting of community consultation regarding key landscape values and application of preliminary assessment tools has been developed. The tools include consideration of the potential impact of the proposals on dwellings and key public viewpoints.
The preliminary assessment tools have been designed to assist proponents to drive better outcomes. They will assist in identifying early in the process the locations where wind turbines may have impacts that warrant further consideration. This in turn provides an opportunity to refine the proposed wind turbine layout to avoid or minimise impacts, or justify the proposed design prior to lodgement of the application.
Proponents will be required to submit, with the request for SEARs, a Preliminary Environmental Assessment that includes a map with key information, results of community consultation and the application of the preliminary assessment tools. This will form the basis for the issue of the SEARs that will identify the matters that must be addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Figure 1 Steps in Visual Assessment Process (Source: Wind Energy Visual Assessment Bulletin, 2016)
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 4 1.0 Introduction
1.2 Relevant Experience
The Bulletin states the proponent is expected to engage professionals from relevant natural resource management and design professions (for example environmental planners, geographers, landscape architects, or other visual resource specialists), with demonstrated experience and capabilities in visual assessment to carry out a wind energy project visual assessment.
Moir Landscape Architecture Pty Ltd is a professional design practice and consultancy specialising in the areas of Landscape Architecture, Landscape Planning and Landscape and Visual Impact. Our team has extensive experience in undertaking Landscape and Visual Impact Assessments for wind energy projects. In the context of our experience and with guidance from the Visual Assessment Bulletin we have developed methodologies to ensure a comprehensive and qualitative assessment of the Project.
Relevant experience includes the preparation of Landscape and Visual Impact Assessments for the following Wind Energy Projects:
• Crudine Ridge Wind Farm (New South Wales) • Bodangora Wind Farm (Bodangora, New South Wales) • Capital II Wind Farm (Bungendore, New South Wales) • Uungula Wind Farm (Wellington, New South Wales) • Lord Howe Island Wind Turbines (Lord Howe Island, New South Wales) • Hills of Gold Wind Farm (Nundle, New South Wales)
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 5 2.0 Study Method
2.1 Study Method 2.3 Report Structure
The following table provides an overview of the requirements of the Bulletin and where these have 2.1.1 Desktop Assessment: been addressed in the PVIA:
• Application of Preliminary Assessment Tools to determine receptors with potential sensitivity. Preliminary Visual Impact Assessment Report Structure: • Preparation of a preliminary Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI) to establish a theoretical zone of visibility of the Project. Bulletin Requirements: Addressed in report: • Identification of key viewpoints and landscape features using available mapping. • Undertake community consultation to establish key Refer to Section 4.0: landscape features valued by the community, key viewpoints in the area (both public and private) along with information Community Consultation 2.1.2 Site Inspection: about the relative scenic quality of the area.
Photographic survey work for the study was undertaken in November 2020 to carry out a preliminary • Production of a map detailing key landscape features Refer to Section 5.0 : assessment of the existing landscape character from publicly accessible land within the Study Area. (informed by community consultation and any ground- truthing undertaken), the preliminary wind turbine layout, Existing Landscape Character The purpose of the site inspection was to verify the findings of the desktop assessment, document key the location of dwellings and key public viewpoints, and an landscape features and identify additional key viewing locations. overlay of the wind resource.
• Results of the preliminary assessment tools for both the Refer to Section 6.0: 2.2 Wind Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin visual magnitude and multiple wind turbine parameters. Preliminary Assessment Tools
The Wind Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin for State Significant Wind Energy Development (referred Appendix A & B: to hereafter as ‘the Bulletin’) was prepared by the Department of Planning and Environment in December 2016. The Bulletin has been developed to guide the appropriate location of wind energy development Preliminary Dwelling and Viewpoint Assessment in NSW and to establish an assessment framework for the assessment of visual impacts associated • The use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Refer to Section 7.0: with wind energy. Visual impacts are one of a range of issues considered in the assessment and facilitate the application of the tools will streamline the determination of wind energy projects. evaluation phase of a project during the pre-lodgement Preliminary Zone of Visual Influence stage. Most GIS systems can establish the theoretical ‘zone of visual influence’ of the proposal (the area from which the The objectives of the Bulletin are to: proposal is theoretically visible or the ‘visual catchment’).
• provide the community, industry and decision-makers with a framework for visual impact analysis Summary and Recommendations - Section 8.0 and assessment that is focused on minimising and managing the most significant impacts; • facilitate improved wind turbine and ancillary infrastructure siting and design during the pre- Table 1 Preliminary VIA Report Requirements and Structure lodgement phase of a project, and encourage early consideration of visual impacts to minimise conflicts and delays where possible, and provide for a better planning outcome; • provide the community and other stakeholders with greater clarity on the process along with an opportunity to integrate community landscape values into the assessment process; and • provide greater consistency in assessment by outlining appropriate assessment terminology and methodologies.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 6 3.0 Project Overview
3.1 The Proposed Development
The proposed Jeremiah Wind Farm (the Project) is located approximately 25 km east of Gundagai around the Adjungbilly area in the South West Slopes of NSW. The project sits within the Cootamundra- Gundagai Regional Council area. For the purpose of this report, general extent of the project area Jugiong includes land bordering the Bungongo State Forest in the north, and Wee Jasper State forest in the south east is located on privately owned land, all of which is predominately used for agricultural purposes.
The proposal is to construct, operate, and ultimately decommission and a rehabilitate a commercial- scale wind farm indicatively producing 400 MW of clean energy to power the equivalent of approximately 200,000 average NSW households each year. The proposed project would connect to the existing 330 kV transmission line running approximately north-south within the project. The inclusion of an Energy Storage Facility (ESF) will allow for the Project to store and dispatch scheduled and reliable energy to and from the Project or the National Electricity Market (NEM).
The Project is generally comprised of the following:
• Approximately 65 wind turbine generators (WTGs) to maximum tip height of 300m Gundagai • Generating capacity of approximately 400 MW • Provision for an Energy Storage Facility (ESF) (capacity and type to be determined) • Ancillary infrastructure including site offices, internal roads, hardstands, underground and overhead cabling, monitoring masts, substation, a battery and a switching station. • Temporary facilities: site compounds, laydown areas, stockpiles, rock crushing and concrete batch plants, temporary roads. Wee Jasper
The proposed project elements including WTGs, ESF, Ancillary Infrastructure and Temporary Facilities will be micro-sited post-Development Consent during the optimisation, detailed design and construction phase programming.
The electricity generated and dispatched by the Project would provide significant carbon emission savings relative to the electricity from NSW coal powered generation.
In accordance with long-term strategic plans, the Project has been developed through a comprehensive Tumut process that incorporates community and stakeholder feedback to maximise positive social, economic and environmental outcomes while minimising adverse impacts and unintended consequences.
Figure 2 Site Context (Map Source: Google Maps, 2021)
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 7 3.0 Project Overview
Preliminary Project Layout
LEGEND
Involved residence
Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m)
Indicative 300m Wind Turbine Location
8000m from nearest wind turbine
Figure 3 Preliminary Project Layout (Map Source: Six Maps 2021)
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 8 4.0 Community Consultation
4.1 Community Consultation Process
In accordance with the Bulletin: community consultation at this early stage may be broad, but should include discussions about the proposed project area, likely corridors of development, or preliminary turbine layouts and must involve people from the visual catchment. The purpose of community consultation is to establish key landscape features, areas of scenic quality and key public viewpoints valued by that community.
In accordance with the Bulletin, ongoing community consultation has been undertaken by the proponent through face to face meetings and a questionnaire which was made available online. As of 26th April 2021, a total of seventeen (17) questionnaires had been completed, the results of which have been outlined in the following section. A copy of the tailored questionnaire provided to the community has been included in Appendix D, along with the full range of responses.
Community engagement will continue through the Project and provide the community with further opportunities to provide input into the Visual Baseline Study of the LVIA.
Figure 4: Results of Community Survey Question 2 4.2 Community Perception
Understanding of the community perception towards the proposed development is an intrinsic component of the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment process.
A CSIRO study published in 2012: Exploring community acceptance of rural wind farms in Australia provides a snapshot of community acceptance levels regarding Australian wind farms from a variety of stakeholder perspectives. It found levels of acceptance among the public are highly subjective and can differ depending on location, local context and place attachment.
The main concerns surrounding the project include Visual (53%), Noise (52%) and Effects on Flora and Fauna (59%). The concerns have been raised based on current understanding of the Project.
65% of respondents identified clean energy as a positive benefit of the Project.
Figure 5: Results of Community Survey Question 3
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 9 4.0 Community Consultation
4.3 Landscape Values 4.4 Key Landscape Features & Areas of Scenic Quality
Landscape values are highly subjective and can differ depending on location, local context and place In addition to a review of existing landscape maps and detailed field work. The community consultation attachment. The results of specific questions assisted in the identifying key areas of concern and questionnaire asked respondents to identify key landscape features in the area. A large percentage of ensuring the LVIA provided comprehensive assessment taking into account landscape values held the respondents identified the Murrumbigdee River and associated valley as a key landscape feature by the community. of the area. The following lists the features identified by the community:
In response to the question ‘what do you value most about your local area?’, 76% of respondents • Murrumbidgee River identified recreation opportunities as a highly valued by the community. Following this, farming (65%) • Murrumbidgee Valley and local history (46%) were identified as valued by the community (See graph Figure( 6). • Burrinjuck Nature Reserve • Mt Europe Responses to the question ‘what do you value about the existing natural and built environment?’ • Black Andrew varied, however the common theme in the responses relating to landscape values generally related • Wee Jasper Caves to the following: • Burrinjuck Dam • Wee Jasper Township • Sense of isolation from the built environment (existing lack of man-made buildings and structures) • Red Hill • Presence of wild life (in particular bird life) • The river and associated valley Broad landscape features identified included: • Existing bushland / vegetation • Hills and topography • Undulating hills and mountains • River Valley The responses to the questionnaire have been included in Appendix D and will be considered in • Natural scenery further detail through the Visual Baseline Study in the EIS Phase. The results of the questionnaire have been provided in full in Appendix D. The key landscape features have been included on Figure 9 and will be assessed in further detail in the EIS Phase of the Project.
4.5 Key Public Viewpoints
Key viewpoints identified by the community for further assessment include:
• Kayaking along the river • Childowla Road • Burrinjuck Nature Reserve • Private property
These locations have been included on Figure 9 and where possible will be assessed in further detail in the EIS Phase.
Figure 6: Results of Landscape Values Questionnaire Question 1
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 10 5.0 Existing Landscape Character
5.1 Overview of Bio-region 5.2 Land use
The Project lies within the South Western Slopes Bioregion, considered as part of the Slopes Sub For the purposes of this report, the Study Area is generally defined by a 15km area (approx.) from Region. the Project Area. The extents of the Figure 10 Map demonstrates the area studied in preparation of the PVIA, making up the area referred to as the ‘Study Area’. The Yass Valley, Snowy Valleys and The Project borders the South Eastern Highlands Bioregion to the east. Cootamundra-Gundagai LGA areas are located within the Study Area. However, it is noted that the Project Site is located within the Cootamundra-Gundagai LGA only. The South Western Slopes Biogregion is characterised by foothills and isolated ranges comprising the lower inland slopes associated with the Great Dividing Range. It extends from north of Cowra through The following provides an overview of the land use zoning within the Study Area and its immediate southern NSW into western Victoria. surrounds (Refer Figure 8). RU1 - Primary Production The Upper Slopes region in particular is characterised by steep, hilly and undulating ranges and RU3 - Forestry Granite basins and confined river valleys with terrace remnants. E1 - Natural Parks and Nature Reserves
The soil consist of shallow, stony soils on the tops of ridges and hills and includes a mixture of alluvial E3 - Environmental Management sands and loams along the valley floors and areas of alluvial clays nearer to the Riverine Plain. RU5 - Village R5 - Large Lot Residential The vegetation in the Subregion consists of mostly open forests and woodlands including Red SP2 - Infrastructure Stringybark along hilly areas and Rough-barked Apple on flats with River Oak along tributaries and River Red Gum on lower and larger streams. RU1 Primary Production The Project Area and surrounding land is predominantly zoned RU1 - Primary Production. Both Tumut The South Western Slopes Bioregion is unique for its diversity of geology, geomorphology and biota and Gundagai LEP state the following objective of the RU1 zoning that is relevant to the visual impact which includes well-developed karst landscapes and rich fossil assemblages (Environment NSW, assessment: 2016) ‘To protect significant scenic landscapes’.
The South Eastern Highlands Bioregion is typically characterised by rugged hills and stony slopes. RU3 Forestry The Bungongo State Forest adjoins the Project Area to the north, east and south. Red Hill State Forest is located approximately 9 km to the south of the Project Area. These areas are zoned RU3 Forestry and are to enable development for forestry purposes and other development that is compatible with forestry land uses.
Approx. Study E1 Natural Parks and Nature Reserves Area Burrinjuck Nature Reserve is located approximately 5km east of the Project Area.
Black Andrew Nature Reserve is located approximately 7km east of the Project Area.
Wee Jasper Nature Reserve is located approximately 15km south east of the Project Area.
Figure 7 NSW Bio Regions (Source: NPWS) These areas are classed as E1 - Natural Parks and Nature Reserves.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 11 5.0 Existing Landscape Character
Nature Reserves are reserved under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (the Act). Section 30J R5 - Large Lot Residential of the Act states: An area of large lot residential is surrounds the village of Wee Jasper approximately 16km south east (1) The purpose of reserving land as a nature reserve is to identify, protect and conserve areas of the Project Area. There are no applicable objectives as part of this land use typology. containing outstanding, unique or representative ecosystems, species, communities or natural phenomena so as to enable those areas to be managed in accordance with subsection (2). SP2 - Infrastructure The area associated with the convergence of the Murrumbidgee River and Burrinjuck Lake is zoned (2) A nature reserve is to be managed in accordance with the following principles— SP2 - Infrastructure. There are no applicable objectives as part of this land use typology. • (a) the conservation of biodiversity, the maintenance of ecosystem function, the protection of geological and geomorphological features and natural phenomena, • (b) the conservation of places, objects, features and landscapes of cultural value, • (c) the promotion of public appreciation, enjoyment and understanding of the nature reserve’s natural and cultural values, • (d) provision for appropriate research and monitoring, • (e) provision for the carrying out of development in any part of a special area (within the meaning of the Hunter Water Act 1991) in the nature reserve that is permitted under section 185A having regard to the conservation of the nature reserve’s natural and cultural values. - National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 s. 30J (Austl.)
E3 - Environmental Management The areas adjoining the northern lake frontage of Burrinjuck Lake as well as vegetated parcels of land to the north and south of the dam infrastructure have been classified as E3 - Environmental Management.
The objectives of this land use within the Yass Valley LEP applicable to the visual impact assessment are as follows: • To protect, manage and restore areas with special ecological, scientific, cultural or aesthetic values. • To provide for a limited range of development that does not have an adverse effect on those values.
RU5 - Village Wee Jasper is located to the south east of the Project Area. It is classified as RU5 - Village within the Yass Valley LEP. The applicable objective under this land use is as follows:
‘To ensure that development is compatible with village character and amenity’.
There are a number of other small hamlets within the Study area however, they have not been classified as a Village within the LEP’s. They are as follows: • Gobarralong • Adjungbilly • Burrinjuck
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 12 5.0 Existing Landscape Character
5.3 Key Landscape Features slopes and alluvial flats along Wee Jasper Creek and Native Dog Creek and conserves 4 distinct forest ecosystems. The reserve is home to a series of cave and karst systems. A variety of key landscape features exist within the Study Area and help to define the specific landscape State Forests character areas (Refer Fig. 9). Bungongo State Forest is an undulating to large State Forest located directly north and south of the Rivers and Creeks Project Area. It includes a mixture of Hardwood and Softwood forests with rows of non-native Pinus The Murrumbidgee River and associated Valley runs through the Study Area. The River flows into Lake radiata plantations occurring on the northern, southern and western boundaries of the area. Burrinjuck and is a major tributary of the Murray River. The construction of Lake Burrinjuck has significantly Ridgelines reduced the occurrence of flooding in the area, however sections of the River are prone to flooding. The landscape is generally undulating, with some steep sections located around Lake Burrinjuck. Undulating landscapes and hillsides are characteristic of the area, particularly around Lake Burrinjuck, The roads generally follow the river, eventually leading to bridge crossings therefore, the River is a south of Adjungbilly Creek and along the northern section of the Murrumbidgee River. major landscape feature when traversing the area.
Lakes Scenic Lookouts and Points of Interest Lake Burrinjuck is a major landscape feature within the area. It is a Heritage Listed Dam that began A desktop search and site visit identified no record of existing formalised lookouts in the area. construction in 1907. Whilst it is a major feature within the area, the character is that of a constructed landscape for the purposes of hydroelectric power, flood mitigation and water supply. The has The Nature Reserves and Lakes are a major draw card to the area but as noted previously there are no an industrial function and houses a hydroelectric power station and has three operational turbine public access trails or facilities. generators, with a generating capacity of 28 MW of electricity. Views from the Murrumbidgee River itself have been identified as important and popular scenic viewing Nature Reserves location. Burrinjuck Nature Reserve is located to the east of the Project Area and adjoins Lake Burrinjuck to the south. It is characterised by steep and rugged slopes, including Mount Europe, that protect diverse forest The impressive limestone formations of Careys Caves are located south east of the Project Area and ecosystems dominated by blue gums, peppermints, red stringybarks and box trees. It is also home to a are a popular tourist destination. variety of endangered Native Fauna including the yass daisy, crimson spider orchid, wee jasper grevillea, Walking Tracks & Camp Grounds gang gang cockatoo and powerful owl (NPNSW, 2021). There are no public facilities in the reserve. The Hume and Hovell Track cuts through the eastern section of Study Area. It is a 426km track that runs from Wondonga to Yass and passes through the Burrinjuck, Black Andrew and Wee Jasper Elevations range from 400 metres on the shores of Burrinjuck Dam to 965 metres at Barran Jack Peak Nature Reserves. with a ridgeline running through the centre of the northern section of the Reserve, gently sloping down toward the Lake. (POM , 2010) A variety of hikes traverse the Burrinjuck, Black Andrew and Wee Jasper Nature Reserves however due to the topography the majority are intended for use by experienced hikers only. Black Andrew Nature Reserve is located to the east of the Project Area and adjoins Lake Burrinjuck to the north. The Reserve is considered to have a high diversity of vegetation types for such a small area, The Campgrounds are generally located in the vicinity of the Lake, Caves and Wee Jasper Nature due to the sharp changes in elevation. Up to 7 distinct forest ecosystems have been identified within Reserve. Jugiong Village has a popular free camp site located at the showgrounds. the reserve, providing high quality habitat for a number of significant native fauna species. There are no public access trails leading to the boundary of the nature reserve. (POM, 2006). Wee Jasper Nature Reserve is located on the western side of the Wee Jasper valley and south east of the Project Area. The valley is relatively steep with valley walls rising abruptly from the valley floor to a maximum elevation of 800m in the reserve. The reserve consists of steep east-facing valley
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 13 5.0 Existing Landscape Character
5.4 Landscape Character Types 5.5 Key Viewpoints
Gobarralong A number of Landscape Character typologies exist within the Project Area (Refer Figure 10). Gobarralong is a rural community of approximately 52 people and is located within 8km of the Project LCU01: Lake Burrinjuck Area. There are no public buildings making up a the centre of the village, rather a number of rural properties Steep to undulating densely vegetated hillsides including the Burrinjuck Nature Reserve, Black Andrew Nature Reserve and portions of the Bungongo State Forest. Land use in this area is generally densely Adjungbilly vegetated and classed as Productive Forestry or Nature Reserve with pockets of cleared farmland in Adjungbilly is a rural community of approximately 80 people and is located within 8km of the Project areas adjoining the Murrumbidgee River. Area. It consists of a Community Hall, Primary School and a handful of rural dwellings. LCU02: Murrumbidgee River Burrinjuck Undulating to low rolling hills that meet with flat areas associated with the banks of the Murrumbidgee Burrinjuck is a small village located alongside the western side of the Lake and is located just within River. Land use in the area is mostly cleared grazing and modified pastures with small pockets of 8km of the Project Area. It consists of a small number of dwellings built into the hillside, a small general dryland and irrigated cropping within areas in proximity to the River. Vegetation in the area is generally store servicing the camp ground and a Community Hall. located along rivers, creeklines, hilltops and valleys. The undulating topography contrasted with the Murrumbidgee River and Valley along with the various Creeklines form a major element to the Wee Jasper character of the area. The LCU includes the town of Jugiong, located approximately 17km from the Wee Jasper is a small town, located in excess of 20km from the Project Area. It is popular with tourists Project Area. due to its proximity to tourist attractions, camping opportunities and unique geological features. LCU03: Jeremiah Jugiong Jeremiah LCU is characterised the sloping to gently undulating landform to the south of the Jugiong is a historic village located approximately 17km from the Project Area. It is popular with Murrumbidgee River. Land use in the area is mostly cleared grazing and modified pastures with small tourists, particularly those travelling by caravan. pockets of dryland and irrigated cropping within areas in proximity to the River. Vegetation in the area is generally located along rivers, creeklines, and ridgelines.
LCU04: Berremangra Undulating to steep topography to the north of the Murrumbidgee River. The land use in the LCU is generally cleared grazing land. Remnant pockets of native vegetation exist within the valleys, along roadways and on the steeper slopes and mountain tops within the LCU.
LCU05: Adjungbilly This landscape is characterised by steep ridgelines and gently undulating topography and is contrasted by a series of creeklines, to the south of the Murrumbidgee River. The area is mostly cleared with remnant native vegetation located along creeklines and within the steep valleys and mountain tops. The area in the east of the LCU is generally characterised by large flat areas, mostly used for grazing and modified pastures. The LCU includes the Red Hill State Forest to the south and is flanked to the north by Bungongo State Forest.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 14 5.0 Existing Landscape Character
Jugiong Approx. 7km N Land Use
MURRUMBIDGEE RIVER Yass Valley LGA Legend:
RU1 - Primary Production
RU3 - Forestry
E1 - Natural Parks and Nature Reserves
E3 - Environmental Management
BURRINJUCK RU5 - Village NATURE RESERVE R5 - Large Lot Residential BUNGONGO
E RIVER STATE FOREST E SP2 - Infrastructure G ID B M U LAKE Proposed Wind Turbine R MUR Gobarralong BURRINJUCK OAK CREEK Burrinjuck Involved residence
Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
Gundagai Approx. Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m) 10km SW A D Town/Village JU BUNGONGO N G B STATE FOREST IL LY BLACK ANDREW C R E NATURE RESERVE E K
Wee Jasper Nature Reserve Adjungbilly
Wee Jasper
RED HILL STATE FOREST WEE JASPER Snowy Valleys LGA NATURE RESERVE
Cootamundra-Gundagai LGA
Figure 8 Land Use
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 15 5.0 Existing Landscape Character
JUGIONG FREE CAMPGROUND Key Landscape Features and M U RRU MBIDGEE viewpoints R IV E R Legend:
Walking Tracks
Mountains
State Forest
HUME & HOVELL TRACK Nature Reserves
Ridgelines RILEYS HILL MOUNT EUROPE 600m 820m Campsites
BURRINJUCK Points of Interest NATURE RESERVE BARREN JUCK Creeks/Rivers 966m BOGONGO STATE Proposed Wind Turbine FOREST BURRINJUCK CAMPGROUND Involved residence
LAKE Non-involved residence (within 8000m) BURRINJUCK OAK CREEK Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m)
BLACK ANDREW OAK CREEK MOUNTAIN NATURE 935m RESERVE A D BLACK ANDREW JU N G NATURE RESERVE B BUNGONGO IL JEREMIAH CREEK COORADIBGEE LY STATE FOREST C R CAMPGROUND E E K CAREYS CAVES
CAREYS Kangaroo RESERVE Mountain SHED CREEK
WEE JASPER RED HILL STATE NATURE RESERVE FOREST
Figure 9 Landscape Features and Viewpoints
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 16 5.0 Existing Landscape Character
Jugiong Preliminary Landscape Character Units Legend:
LCU04: Berremangra LCU01: Lake Burrinjuck
LCU02: Murrumbidgee River
LCU03: Jeremiah
LCU02: Murrumbidgee LCU04: Berremangra River LCU05: Adjungbilly
Proposed Wind Turbine
Involved residence
Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
LCU01: Lake Burrinjuck LCU03: Jeremiah Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m)
Town/Village
Gobarralong Burrinjuck
OAK CREEK
Adjungbilly LCU05: Adjungbilly
Wee Jasper
Figure 10 Landscape Character Types
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 17 6.0 Preliminary Assessment Tools
6.1 Preliminary Assessment Tools
Preliminary assessment tools have been developed in the Bulletin to provide an early indication of where turbines require careful consideration because of potential visual impacts. The tools apply to both dwellings and key public viewpoints in the study area. The tools provide an early indication of 6000 5900m5.90km where placement of turbines will require further assessment and justification, and where consultation 5500 with potentially affected landowners needs to be focused – including discussions for landholder 5000 agreements. 4500 - Wind Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin, December 2016, NSW Planning & Environment 4000 4000m4.00km ) m (
g 3500 n i l l
The preliminary assessment tools involve analysis of two key visual parameters: e w 3000 d
Refer to Section 6.2 m
1. Visual Magnitude ( ) o r f
2500 e c
2. Multiple Wind Turbine Tool (Refer to Section 6.4) n a t 2000 s i D 1500
1000 In addition to the Preliminary Assessment Tools, the Bulletin recommends the use of technology to facilitate the application of the tools. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has been utilised to 500 00 establish a ‘Zone of Visual Influence’ of the proposal and provide an early indication of the extent of 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 visibility of the project (based on the preliminary layout)(Refer to Section 7.1). Turbine height (m)
6.2 Preliminary Assessment Tool 1: Visual Magnitude Figure 11 Visual Magnitude thresholds for Project Layout (Source: Visual Assessment Bulletin)
The Visual Magnitude Threshold, as defined in the Bulletin, is based on the height of the proposed wind turbines to the tip of the blade and distance from dwellings or key public viewpoints as shown in Figure 9.
In accordance with the Bulletin ‘proposed turbines below the black line must be identified along with the dwellings or key public viewpoints as part of the request for SEARs’. The proposed wind turbines are based on a worst case scenario with a tip height of up to 300 metres. The ‘black line ‘intersects at a distance of 4000 metres and the ‘blue line’ intersects at 5900 metres.
For the purpose of the Preliminary Assessment, the Visual Magnitude thresholds are based on a 2D assessment of the Project alone. Further assessment may indicate factors such as topography, relative distance and existing vegetation may minimise or eliminate the impacts of the project from residences.
Residences identified within 4000m of the nearest proposed turbine are shown on Figure 12 and listed in Table 2.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 18 6.0 Preliminary Assessment Tools
Visual Magnitude Black Line = 4000m Blue Line = 5900m
LEGEND
Involved residence
Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m)
300m Wind Turbine
4000m from nearest wind turbine
5900m from nearest wind turbine
8000m from nearest wind turbine
Figure 12 Preliminary Assessment Tool 1: Visual Magnitude Thresholds
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 19 6.0 Preliminary Assessment Tools
6.3 Results of Visual Magnitude Assessment
Application of the Preliminary Assessment Tools to the Jeremiah Wind Farm Project identified dwellings which require further assessment in accordance with the Bulletin. Detailed assessment of these dwellings will be undertaken in the EIS Phase.
Within the black line of visual magnitude (4000 metres from nearest turbine): • There are eleven (11) non-involved dwellings and two (2) possible dwelling locations located within 4000 m of the nearest turbine, Refer to Table 2. • There are nine (9) involved dwellings.
Between the black and blue line of visual magnitude (4000 - 5900 metres): • There are fourteen (14) non-involved dwellings are located within 5900 m of the nearest turbine, Refer to Table 3. • There are three (3) involved dwellings.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 20 6.0 Preliminary Assessment Tools
6.4 Preliminary Assessment Tool 2: Multiple Wind Turbine Tool 6.5 Results of Multiple Wind Turbine Tool
Figure 14 The Multiple Wind Turbine Tool provides a preliminary indication of potential cumulative impacts When applied to the Project, the 2D Multiple Wind Turbine Tool (see ) identified two (2) non- arising from the proposed wind energy project. To establish whether the degree to which dwellings involved dwellings with more than two (2) 60º sectors of turbines within 8000 metres. or key public viewpoints may be impacted by multiple wind turbines, the proponent must map into six sectors of 60° any proposed turbines, and any existing or approved turbines within eight kilometres Three (3) dwellings have turbines in up to two 60º sectors (up to 120º). This is deemed acceptable. • MR001 of each dwelling or key public viewpoint. Figure 13 below provides examples of where a dwelling or • NRS004 key public viewpoint may have views to turbines in multiple 60° sectors. • NRS002
Two (2) dwellings have turbines in up to three 60º sectors (up to 180º). These dwellings will require detailed assessment:
• PCR004 • NRS005
Figure 13 Preliminary Assessment Tool: Multiple Wind Turbines (Source: Visual Assessment Bulletin)
In accordance with the Bulletin Where wind turbines are visible within the horizontal views of the dwelling or key public viewpoints in three or more 60° sectors, the proponents must identify the turbines, relative dwelling and key public viewpoint, along with the relative distance and submit these to the Department as part of the request for SEARs. These turbines will become a focus for assessment in the EIS.
Figure 14 provides an overview of the number of 60º sectors visible from each of the dwellings identified within 8 kilometres.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 21 6.0 Preliminary Assessment Tools
Multiple Wind Turbine Tool Jeremiah Wind Farm
LEGEND Involved residence
Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m)
300m Wind Turbine
4000m from nearest wind turbine
5900m from nearest wind turbine
8000m from nearest wind turbine
Number of sectors with turbines (Based on 2D Assessment) (Refer Appendix C) One (1) 60º sector
Two (2) 60º sectors (up to 120º)
Three (3) 60º sectors (up to 180º)
Note: Preliminary Assessment Tool 2: Multiple Wind Turbine Tool is based on a 2D Assessment alone and does not take into account topography, vegetation or other screening factors which may reduce the potential for viewing multiple turbines.
Figure 14 Preliminary Assessment Tool 2: Multiple Wind Turbine Tool
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 22 7.0 Preliminary Zone of Visual Influence
7.1 Preliminary Zone of Visual Influence
The Bulletin states ‘the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to facilitate the application of the tools will streamline the evaluation phase of the evaluation phase of a project during the pre-lodgement stage. This can also assist in refining the number of turbines and viewpoints that will ultimately need more detailed assessment.’
A preliminary Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI) has been prepared for the Project to illustrate the theoretical visibility of the proposed project (based on the preliminary layout). A wind turbine height of 300 metres has been used to provide a worst case scenario.
The Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI) represents the area over which a development can theoretically be seen, and is based on a Digital Terrain Model (DTM). The ZVI usually presents a bare ground scenario - ie. A landscape without screening, structures or vegetation, and is usually presented on a base map. It is also referred to as a zone of theoretical visibility (The Landscape Institute and the institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, 2002).
The ZVI has been determined through the use of digital topographic information and 3D modelling software WindPro. The ZVI has been assessed to approximately 10km from the project. Although it is possible for the development to be visible from further than 10km away, it is generally accepted that beyond 10km visibility is greatly diminished.
A preliminary ZVI figure has been prepared by Moir LA to assess the Jeremiah Windfarm. Figure 15 depicts the areas of land from which the proposed development may be visible and provides an indicative number of visible wind turbines.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 23 7.0 Preliminary Zone of Visual Influence
Preliminary Zone of Visual Influence Jeremiah Wind Farm LEGEND
Involved residence
Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m)
300m (Tip Height) Wind Turbine
4000m from nearest wind turbine
5900m from nearest wind turbine
8000m from nearest wind turbine
Number of visible turbines (Based on topography alone):
0
1 - 15
15 - <25
25 - <35
35 - <45
45 - <55
55 - < = 65
Note:
The ZVI is a preliminary assessment tool that represents a bare ground scenario - ie. a landscape without screening, structures or vegetation. As accurate information on the height and coverage of vegetation and buildings is unavailable, it is important to note the ZVI is based solely on topographic information. Therefore this form of mapping should be acknowledged as representing the worst case scenario.
Figure 15. Zone of Visual Influence (Maximum blade tip height of 300m)
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 24 8.0 Summary
8.1 Summary of the Preliminary VIA
The application of Preliminary Assessment Tools as per the Bulletin identified eleven (11) non-involved dwellings and two (2) possible dwelling locations located within the black line of visual magnitude (4000 metres from nearest turbine) and fourteen (14) non-involved dwellings within the blue line of visual magnitude (4000 - 5900 metres).
The Moir LA have undertaken a Preliminary Viewpoint Analysis from key Public Locations as well as a Visual Preliminary Dwelling Assessments on the following Dwellings : • CRO11 • BR003 • CRO12 • BJR026 • CRO13 • MR001 • CRO022 • GRO021 • PCR001 • HR004 • PCR002 • HR006 • PCR004 • HR009 • BDR004 • HR011 • BDR003 • HR014 • BDR010 • GHR002 • BDR012 • CWR0118 • NRS002 • CWR020 • NRS004 • GAR001 • NRS005 • GAR004 • NRS007 • GAR004 • NRS008 • GAR10 • NRS009 • KMR016 • NRS010
The 2D Multiple Wind Turbine Tool identifies three (3) non-involved dwellings with more than two (2) 60º sectors of turbines within 8000 metres (MR001, NRS004 and NRS002) and two (2) dwellings with turbines in up to three 60º sectors (up to 180º) (PCR004 & NRS005).
Detailed assessment of these dwellings will be undertaken during the EIS phase of the Project.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 25 References https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/burrinjuck-nature-reserve MAPS: https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Parks-re- serves-and-protected-areas/Parks-plans-of-management/burrinjuck-nature-reserve-plan-of-manage- NSW Government Land and Property Information, Spatial Information Exchange SIX Maps, Ac- ment-100829.pdf cessed at:
NSW Planning and Environment, Wind Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin For State significant wind Google Earth Pro 2020 Viewed November 2020 - May 2021 www.google.com/earth/index.html energy development, December 2016.
NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Services, Developments adjacent to National Parks and Wildlife Service lands: Guidelines for consent and planning authorities, 2020.
The Landscape Institute and the institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Second Edition, New York, 2002.
JEREMIAH WIND FARM | PRELIMINARY VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PAGE 26 Appendix A Preliminary Assessment Tools
APPENDIX A | PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT TOOLS | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | MAY 2021 | FINAL REV E A1. Preliminary Assessment Tools
TABLE 2: Preliminary Desktop Assessment - Dwellings within 4000m (Black Line)
Non-associated Dwellings within 4000m
HOUSE ID Address: Closest Number of Number of 60º Desktop Assessment WTG (km): Turbines Sectors (Based on ZVI) (Based on 2D Assessment)
MR001 329 MARYVALE RD, ADJUNGBILLY 2727 2.12km 45 - 55 2 (Up to 120º) Up to 55 visible turbines in up to 120º of views generally towards the south. Limited intervening vegetation.
NRS005 NANANGROE RD, ADJUNGBILLY 2727 1.86km 35-45 3 (Up to 180º) Up to 40 turbines visible to the south. Scattered vegetation to the south of the house.
HR004 229 STOCKDALE RD, GOBARRALONG 3.95km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) The tip of one WTG may be visible from this dwelling. Existing buildings and scattered vegetation is likely to fragment / screen 2727 views.
HR006 372 HOPEWOOD RD, GOBARRALONG 3.60km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) Two blades visible to the east. Existing vegetation likely to intervene views. 2727
PCR001 239 PARSONS CREEK RD, ADJUNGBILLY 3.80km 55-65 1 (Up to 60º) Dwelling appears to be located in an elevated position. All turbines likely to be visible. Limited intervening vegetation to the 2727 north east.
PCR004 866 PARSONS CREEK RD, ADJUNGBILLY 3.19km 35-45 3 (Up to 180º) Approximately 45 WTGs visible to the north east. Dwelling appears to be located in an elevated position. 2727 No intervening vegetation.
CWR022 2504 CHILDOWLA RD, BOOKHAM 2582 3.27km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 3 WTGs and two blades visible to the south west. Some intervening vegetation.
CR012 989 CROWES RD, COOLAC 2727 3.96km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 5 turbines visible to the east. No screening factors.
HR008 574 HOPEWOOD RD, GOBARRALONG 3.66km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 4 turbines visible to the east. Some intervening vegetation. 2727
CWR025 2.17km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) Two blades and one turbine visible to the west. Dwelling located in densely vegetated area. Vegetation is likely to fragment / screen views.
CWR026 1160 BLACK ANDREWS RD, 3.72km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 5 turbines visible to the west. Dwelling located in densely vegetated area. Vegetation is likely to fragment / screen views. ADJUNGBILLY 2727
CWR028 Potential Dwelling Location 3.31km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) Two blades and three (3) turbines may be visible to the south west. This is a potential dwelling location and as such there is 2504 CHILDOWLA RD, BOOKHAM 2582 currently limited vegetation screening factors.
CWR029 Potential Dwelling Location 3.04km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) One blade and four (4) turbines may be visible to the south west. This is a potential dwelling location and as such there is cur- 2504 CHILDOWLA RD, BOOKHAM 2582 rently limited vegetation screening factors.
APPENDIX A | PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT TOOLS | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E A1. Preliminary Assessment Tools TABLE 3: Preliminary Desktop Assessment - Dwellings within between 4000m-5900m (Blue Line)
Non-associated Dwellings within 5900m
HOUSE ID Address: Closest Number of Number of 60º Desktop Assessment WTG (km): Turbines (Based Sectors on ZVI) (Based on 2D Assessment)
NRS002 346 NANANGROE RD, ADJUNGBILLY 2727 4.21km 35-45 2 (Up to 120º) Up to 45 visible turbines in up to 120º of views generally towards the north. Existing buildings and scattered vegetation is likely to fragment views to a number of turbines.
NRS004 1989 NANANGROE RD, ADJUNGBILLY 2727 4.66km 15-25 2 (Up to 120º) Approx. 23 WTGs visible to the south. Dwelling setback approximately 630m north of Bundarbo Road.
NRS008 200 NANANGROE RD, ADJUNGBILLY 2727 5.02km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) One turbine and two blades to the north east. Representative viewpoint will be taken from Nanangroe Road. NRS009 NANANGROE RD, ADJUNGBILLY 2727 5.70km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) Three turbines and one blade to the NNE. Representative viewpoint will be taken from Nanangroe Road.
NRS010 NANANGROE RD, ADJUNGBILLY 2727 5.84km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) One turbine and one blade to the NNE. Representative viewpoint will be taken from Nanangroe Road. CWR021 2253 CHILDOWLA RD, BOOKHAM 2582 5.67km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 5 WTGS and one blade tip visible to the south. Located close to road, will take representative viewpoint.
CWR020 2227 CHILDOWLA RD, BOOKHAM 2582 5.84km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 6 WTGS and one blade tip visible to the south. Located close to road, will take representative viewpoint.
CR011 989 CROWES ROAD, COOLAC 2727 4.02km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 4 turbines visible to the east. No screening factors.
CR013 1188 CROWES RD, COOLAC 2727 4.58km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 5 WTGs visible to the south east. Located close to Crowes Road, representative viewpoint will be taken.
CR014 1261 CROWES RD, COOLAC 2727 4.94km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 5 WTGs visible to the south east. Located close to Crowes Road, representative viewpoint will be taken.
CR015 1270 CROWES RD, COOLAC 2727 5.72km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 5 WTGs visible to the south east. Located close to Crowes Road, representative viewpoint will be taken.
GAR002 322 ADJUNGBILLY RD, GOBARRALONG 2727 5.56km 0 1 (Up to 60º) Not visible due to topography.
HR009 878 HOPEWOOD RD, GOBARRALONG 2727 5.56km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 3 WTGs visible to the south east.
HR010 1065 HOPEWOOD RD, GOBARRALONG 2727 5.76km 1-15 1 (Up to 60º) 3 WTGs and one blade visible to the south east.
APPENDIX A | PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT TOOLS | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | MAY 2021 | FINAL REV E Appendix B Preliminary Viewpoint Assessment
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Preliminary Viewpoint Analysis
PVP06 Preliminary Viewpoint Jugiong Analysis Locations Jeremiah Wind Farm LCU04: Berremangra LEGEND
LCU01: Lake Burrinjuck
LCU02: Murrumbidgee River
PVP10 LCU03: Jeremiah LCU02: Murrumbidgee River LCU04: Berremangra PVP12 LCU05: Adjungbilly PVP07
WTG locations
Involved residence
PVP08 Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
LCU03: Jeremiah PVP14 Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m) PVP01 Town/Village
PVP09 LCU01: Lake Burrinjuck Viewpoint Locations
4000m from nearest wind turbine Gobarralong PVP15 OAK CREEK Burrinjuck 5900m from nearest wind turbine PVP11
8000m from nearest wind turbine
PVP04 PVP05
PVP03 PVP02
LCU05: Adjungbilly Wee Jasper PVP13
Adjungbilly
0 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 m
0 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 m Figure 16 Preliminary Viewpoint Analysis Locations
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP01 ‘Bongongo Angus’ Crowes Rd, Coolac. Dwelling ID: CR013
110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP01
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from the driveway to CR013 on Crowes Road. Crowes Road is an Crowes Rd, Coolac unsealed low use road that provides access to a number of properties located along the banks of the Murrumbidgee River. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: CR013 148°18’26.95”E East The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing and some irrigated 34°57’8.44”S cropping. The topography is generally undulating with contrasting vegetated river flats Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: associated with the adjoining Murrumbidgee River. The Murrumbidgee River can be seen in the middle ground of the view. 4.16km 257m Scattered remnant vegetation can be seen along the hilltops and valleys of the ridgeline in the background of the view. The ridgline to the east of the view assists in screening views toward the east. Potential Visual Impact: From this location it is likely vegetation in the middleground may fragment views to the south east. A combination of vegetation and landform are likely to screen the majority of views toward the Project Area.
Aerial Image PVP01 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP02 Parsons Creek Rd, Adjungbilly. Dwelling ID: PCR001
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP02
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from a crest along Parsons Creek Road at the driveway to Parsons Creek Rd, PCR001. Parsons Creek Road is an unsealed low use road providing access to a small Adjungbilly number of isolated dwellings accessed via long private driveways. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing and forestry purposes with 148°20’41.51”E Northeast 35° 1’40.04”S a large parcel of dense vegetation associated with Bogongo State Forest visible in the middle ground, to the north of the view. Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation:
PCR011 4.10km 495m The topography is undulating with the ridgeline associated with the Project Site visible Approx 820m in the background of the view. Roadside vegetation is uncommon in this area, allowing Northwest for expansive views toward the north east. Vegetation is visible along the top of the ridgeline and within the steep valleys. Potential Visual Impact: From this location it is likely a number of turbines will be visible to the north of the view. It is likely distance may fragment views to a number of turbines to the east, therefore reducing the number of turbines visible from this location.
Aerial Image PVP02 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP03 Parsons Creek Rd, Adjungbilly. Dwelling ID: PCR002
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP03
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from the driveway to PCR002 on Parsons Creek Road. Parsons Parsons Creek Rd, Adjungbilly Creek Road is a low use, unsealed road.
Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing. 148°22’2.50”E Northeast 35° 1’26.33”S The topography is generally undulating with small vegetated valleys, hilltops and Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: creeklines common in the area.
Approx 3.39km 452m Roadside vegetation and vegetated windbreaks are visible in the foreground of the view and contain views to the east. Scattered remnant native vegetation is visible along the small ridgeline associated with the Project area in the background of the view. PCR002 Potential Visual Impact: From this location it is likely a small number of turbines may be visible to the north of the view. It is likely a combination of the windbreak and roadside vegetation will fragment views toward the Project area to the north east therefore reducing the numbers of WTG’s visible from this location.
Aerial Image PVP03 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP04 Parsons Creek Rd, Adjungbilly. Dwelling ID: NRS007
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP04
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from the corner of Adjungbilly Road and Parsons Creek Road, Parsons Creek Rd, nearby NRS007. Adjungbilly Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The land is partially cleared agricultural land used for grazing and forestry purposes.
148°25’51.20”E Northeast 35° 0’42.45”S Remnant native vegetation associated with Parsons Creek can be seen in the middle ground of the view, containing views to the north and north east. Large groupings of Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: vegetation can be seen along the road side and along the hilltops of the surrounding 1.82km 495m ridgelines in the background of the view. NRS007 The topography is flat with the undulating landform of the ridgeline associated with the project site visible in the background of the view. Potential Visual Impact: From this location it is likely that a number of turbines may be visible, particularly to the east of the view. A combination of creekline and remnant native vegetation are likely to fragment views to a small number of turbines to the north and north east, reducing the number visible from this location.
Aerial Image PVP04 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP05 Black Andrews Rd, Adjungbilly. Dwelling ID: n/a
110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP05
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken along Black Andrews Road. Black Andrews Road is a low use, Black Andrews Rd, unsealed road providing access to portions of the State Forest and a small number of Adjungbilly isolated dwellings. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The viewpoint is taken from a flat low point within a small valley associated with the 148°27’43.92”E North 35° 0’56.33”S Project Site. Stony Creek is visible in the middle ground of the view and runs along the edge of the road. Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation:
0.38km 630m The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing. Rolling vegetated ridgelines are visible in the background of the view.
The viewpoint is taken from a location at close proximity to a number of turbines. Potential Visual Impact: From this view it likely a number of turbines will be visible at close range. The ridgeline surrounding the viewpoint may contain views to a small number of turbines located outside of the valley.
Aerial Image PVP05 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP06 Stapylton St, Jugiong. Dwelling ID: n/a
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP06
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: Elevation: This viewpoint is taken nearby the Church located in the village of Jugiong. Stapylton St, Jugiong 274m The viewpoint is taken from a high point within the Village. The Village is generally Coordinates: Viewing Direction: characterised by low density residential housing set amongst gently undulating and 148°19’22.44”E South well vegetated streets. This is contrasted by large flat sections associated with the 34°49’16.40”S Murrumbidgee River and the surrounding rolling hillsides. Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: Vegetation associated with the residential lots is visible in the in the middleground of the 17.28km 274m view.
The landform to the south west of the view contains views to the south and west. Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, vegetation in the middleground is likely to fragment views to the project area, reducing the number of WTG’s visible form this location. When combined with the distance to the project area, it is likely the WTG’s may be difficult to discern.
Aerial Image PVP06 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP07 Bundarbo Rd, Gobarralong. Dwelling ID: BDR003
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP07
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken nearby to BDR003 and BDR004 along Bundarbo Road. Bundarbo Rd, Gobarralong Bundarbo Road is a low use, partially sealed road providing access to a small number of properties accessed using private driveways. A portion of the road follows the Coordinates: Viewing Direction: Murrumbidgee River. 148°23’55.19”E South 34°54’40.61”S The viewpoint is taken from a flat low point at proximity to the River. The topography of Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: the area is generally flat to undulating. A ridgeline is visible in the background of the view and contains views to the south. 6.28km 269 m
BDR003 The land is generally cleared agricultural land used for grazing and some areas of irrigated cropping.
Scattered vegetation associated with homesteads and within grazing lots are visible in the middleground of the view.
Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of BDR004 topography, distance and vegetation, it is likely views toward the Project Area will be screened from this location.
Aerial Image PVP07 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP08 ‘Donna Valley’ Nanangroe Rd, Adjungbilly. Dwelling ID: NRS004
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP08
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken nearby to NRS004 along Nanangro Road. Nanangro Road is a Nanangroe Rd, Adjungbilly low use road providing access to a small number of isolated dwellings accessed via private driveways. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: 148°28’17.09”E South The topography of the area is generally undulating. A localised, rise is visible in the 34°56’27.25”S foreground and background of the view and contains views to the south. NRS004 Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: aprox. 600m The land is generally partially cleared with remnant vegetation located along hillsides. North 4.01km 539m The land is generally used for grazing and forestry activities. Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a small number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of topography, distance and vegetation, it is likely views toward the Project Area will be difficult to discern from this location.
Aerial Image PVP08 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP09 2505 Chidowla Rd, Burrinjuck. Dwelling ID: CWR022
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP09
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken nearby to CWR022 at the end of Chidowla Road. Chidowla Road 2505 Chidowla Rd, is a low use, unsealed road no through road providing access to a small number of Burrinjuck isolated properties situated along the Murrumbidgee River. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The topography of the area is generally undulating to sloping with flat sections located 148°32’4.58”E Southwest 34°58’25.37”S at proximity to the River. A vegetated ridgeline is visible in the background of the view and contains views to the south west. Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation:
3.42km 305m The land is generally partially vegetated to densely vegetated with some small sections of cleared agricultural land used for grazing.
Dense vegetation can be seen in the foreground and contains views to the west. CWR022 Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a small number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of topography, distance and vegetation, it is likely views toward the Project Area will be fragmented from this location, reducing the number visible.
Aerial Image PVP09 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP10 Benangaroo Rd, Berremangra. Dwelling ID: BR003
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP10
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from a highpoint along Benangaroo Road at the driveway to Benangaroo Rd, BR003. Benangaroo Road is an unsealed low use no through road providing access to Berremangra a small number of isolated dwellings accessed via long private driveways. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing, with scattered vegetation 148°25’1.04”E South 34°53’20.27”S associated with hilltops and within grazing lots. Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: The topography is undulating to steep with the ridgeline associated with the Project Site 8.55km 396m visible in the background of the view. Vegetation is visible along the top of the ridgeline and within the valleys and creeklines. BR003 Approx. 1km Southwest Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of distance and vegetation, it is likely views toward the Project Area will be difficult to discern from this location.
Aerial Image PVP10 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP11 Burrinjuck Dam. Dwelling ID: BJR026
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP11
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: BJR026 Location: This viewpoint is taken near the access to the Weir associated with the Burrinjuck Dam Burrinjuck Dam and BJY026. The access road is a low use, sealed road no through road. Due to the topography and dam, there are limited public access or stopping opportunities along Coordinates: Viewing Direction: the length of this road. 148°35’31.90”E West 35° 0’11.22”S The topography of the area is steep and densely vegetated and generally contains Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: views to the north and south.
7.60km 368m The land is generally used for dam infrastructure maintenance vehicles, with land located further toward the campground to the east used for passive recreation.
Burrinjuck Dam can be seen in the foreground of the view.
A small portion of the vegetated ridgeline associated with the Project Area is visible to the west in the distance of the view. Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a small number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of topography, distance and vegetation, it is likely views toward the Project Area will be fragmented from this location, making them difficult to discern.
Aerial Image PVP11 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP12 Hopewood Rd, Gobarralong. Dwelling ID: HR014
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP12
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from the driveway to HR014 on Hopewood Road. Hopewood Hopewood Rd, Gobarralong Road is a low use, unsealed road that generally runs alongside the Murrumbidgee River. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: 148°19’9.76”E Southeast The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing and areas of irrigated 34°54’15.76”S cropping. Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: The topography is gently undulating with scattered vegetation located within grazing 8.34km 243m lots, hilltops and along the rivers and creeks.
A localised rise is visible in the middleground to the east contains views toward the east.
A small vegetated ridgeline can be seen in the distance of the view. HR014 Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a small number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of topography, distance and vegetation it is likely views toward the Project Area may be difficult to discern from this location.
Aerial Image PVP12 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP13 Nanangroe Road, Adjungbilly. Dwelling ID: NRS009 & NRS010
110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP13
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from Nanangro Road, nearby NRS009 and NRS010. Nanangro Nanangroe Rd, Adjungbilly Road is a low use and partially sealed road.
Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing and irrigated cropping. 148°25’1.59”E North 35° 4’16.21”S The topography is gently undulating with scattered vegetation located within grazing Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: lots and hillsides.
5.70km 545m Vegetation associated with the nearby unnamed creek is visible in the middleground of the view.
NRS010 A localised rise is visible in the middleground and contains views toward the north east. Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a small number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of topography, distance and vegetation, it is likely views toward the Project Area will be screened from this location
Aerial Image PVP13 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP14 Maryvale Rd, Adjungbilly. Dwelling ID: MR001
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP14
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from Maryvale Road at the driveway nearby MR001. Maryvale Road is a low use unsealed road used to access to a small number of isolated MR001 Maryvale Rd, Adjungbilly dwellings. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The land is a mixture of cleared agricultural land used for grazing and heavily vegetated 148°26’43.24”E South 34°57’13.52”S forestry land. A portion of State Forest is visible in the middleground of the view.
Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: The topography of the area is undulating with localised rises containing views to the 2.06km 518m east. Potential Visual Impact: An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a number of WTG’s associated with the project may be visible from this location. A combination of topography and vegetation is likely to fragment a portion of the view toward the Project Area from this location.
Aerial Image PVP14 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E PVP15 Gobarralong Rd, Gobarralong. Dwelling ID: GR021
290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° E 100° 110° 120° 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° S 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° 250° 260° W 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° N 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70°
Existing View
N VIEWPOINT PVP15
Viewpoint Summary: Existing Landscape Character Description: Location: This viewpoint is taken from the driveway to GR021 on Gobarralong Road. Gobarralong Gobbaralong Rd, Road is a low use, partially sealed road that generally runs alongside the Murrumbidgee Gobbaralong River. Coordinates: Viewing Direction: The land is mostly cleared agricultural land used for grazing and areas of irrigated 148°15’53.58”E East 34°59’2.30”S cropping.
Distance to nearest WTG: Elevation: The topography is gently undulating with scattered vegetation located within grazing 7.48km 234m lots, hilltops and along the rivers and creeks.
A localised rise is visible in the middleground to the south contains views toward the south.
A small vegetated ridgeline can be seen in the distance of the view. Potential Visual Impact: GR021 Approx. 450m An assessment based on topography alone, identifies a small number of WTG’s South associated with the project may be visible from this location. However, due to the combination of topography and distance, it is likely views toward the Project Area may be fragmented from this location.
Aerial Image PVP15 (Aerial Image Source: Six Maps)
APPENDIX B | PRELIMINARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Appendix C Preliminary Dwelling Assessment Preliminary Dwelling Assessments
Preliminary Dwelling Assessment Locations Jeremiah Wind Farm
LEGEND Involved residence
Non-involved residence (within 8000m)
Non-involved residence (in excess of 8000m)
300m Wind Turbine
4000m from nearest wind turbine
5900m from nearest wind turbine
8000m from nearest wind turbine
Preliminary Dwelling Assessment Location Desktop Dwelling Assessment MR001
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 2.12 km (T30) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 12 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical Up to 2 (120º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 50 - 60 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment NRS005
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 1.86 km (T11) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 14 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical Up to 3 (180º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 35-45 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment HR004
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 3.96 km (T56) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 2 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment HR006
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 3.60km (T60) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 2 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment PCR001
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 3.80km (T00) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 1 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 55-65 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment PCR004
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 3.19km (T00) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 4 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 3 (Up to 180º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 35-45 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment CWR022
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 3.27km (T37) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 4 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment NRS002
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 4.21km (T09) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 2 (Up to 120º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 35-45 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment NRS004
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 4.66km (T11) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 2 (Up to 120º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 15-25 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment NRS008
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 5.02km (T09) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment CR011
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 4.02 km (T60) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment GHR002
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 5.70km (T10) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 35 - 45 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment CWR020
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 5.84km (T21) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment CWR018
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 6.83km (T21) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment BDR012
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 7.020km (T30) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 0 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment BDR010
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 6.91km (T35) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment BDR004
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 5.96km (T35) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment HR009
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 5.56km (T59) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment HR011
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 7.29km (T59) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment GAR001
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 6.63km (T56) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment KMR016
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 7.47km (T56) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment GAR004
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 7.60km (T00) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment GAR010
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 7.75km (T09) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 1-15 (Based on ZVI assessment)
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Desktop Dwelling Assessment BJR026
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Tools:
Nearest proposed 7.59km (T55) turbine (km):
Number of proposed 0 turbines within Black Line (4900m):
Number of theoretical 1 (Up to 60º) 60º Sectors (Based on 2D Assessment):
Number of potentially visible turbines 35-45 (Based on ZVI assessment)
BJR026
LEGEND
Proposed Turbine Location 4900m from nearest turbine (Black Line) 60º sector with turbine
Turbine in excess of 8000m 6000m from nearest turbine (Blue Line)
Involved Dwelling 8000m from nearest turbine
Non-involved Dwelling 60º sectors
APPENDIX C | PRELIMINARY DWELLING ASSESSMENT | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Appendix D
Community Consultation Questionnaire
APPENDIX D | COMMUNITY CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E COMMUNITY SURVEY JEREMIAH WIND FARM COMMUNITY SURVEY JEREMIAH WIND FARM MARCH 2021 MARCH 2021 Community Survey
Name: ______Gender: ______In your opinion what are the key What are the best lookouts / public Are you involved in the project? Age Group: landscape features in the area? viewing locations within the study area Yes 12-18 18-29 30- 44 (Note: these can include natural features such as and its surrounds? No a distinct mountain peak, or cultural features 45-60 61+ Prefer not to say (If you have a visitor, where do you take them to If Yes, please detail your involvement such as an iconic church) showcase your local area?) ______Where do you reside: What do you value the most about your Adjungbilly local area? ______ Gobarralong Local history Burrinjuck Farming ______ Wee Jasper Recreation opportunities Coolac Employment opportunities What do you value about the existing What concerns do you have (if any) in Darbalara Community / Family Gundagai Cultural Heritage natural and built environment? relation to how the Project might impact Other (Please specify) Other (Please specify) on the current aesthetic value and ______amenity? ______Based on your current understanding of Based on your current understanding ______renewable energy, what do you believe are of renewable energy and the project, the most positive benefits of the project? what are your main concerns? (Please ______(Please select one or more) select one or more) Job creation Noise Investment in the local community Traffic Additional comments and/or concerns: Land use diversification Visual Clean energy Effects on land use ______ Increase in tourism Effects on flora and fauna ______ Road upgrades Health impacts Visual appeal No concerns ______ Other (Please specify) Other (Please specify) Thank you for your participation! ______
1 2
Phone: (02) 4013 4640 jeremiahwindfarm.com.au [email protected] Phone: (02) 4013 4640 jeremiahwindfarm.com.au [email protected]
APPENDIX D | COMMUNITY CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Question 4: In your opinion what are the key landscape features in the area? Question 5: What do you value about the existing natural and built environment?
The uninterrupted, natural views of the Valley The presence of natural wildlife and vegetation. Only farm buildings or shacks dotted around the landscape being the only unnatural features of the area Beautiful undulating Hills and mountains, peace and quiet very relaxing. Natural is always best!
The Murrumbidgee river and surrounding landscape has unique beauty with the rock formations The eagles and other bird life are the true value of the area. I value the wilderness and the river. I am and tree lines. I paddle along the river regularly and the area is unique without any industrial and extremely concerned that the Indigenous culture and values have not been appropriately engaged built structures. We clean up rubbish from floods and the industrial rubbish that ends up in the river by the project. is significant after flooding. I walk and paddle in the Burrinjuck Nature Reserve and I have observed many bird species including eagles. I fear for the safety of these birds and the eagles that circle the I value the beauty of the bushland, the hills and the river. ridge lines and hint in the river and surrounding areas. The river valley, the mountains on either side of the river eg. Mt Europe, Black Andrew, the river itself, the natural bush land surrounding the area.
The ability to escape from the any built environment. The peace and quiet with only noise coming from the trees and birds. The Valley and the surrounding hills and ridges. The Murrumbidgee Valley and the surrounding hills The Murrumbidgee River, Black Andrew Nature Reserve, Lake Burrinjuck I value the river and the natural surroundings, The animals that the land is home to. There is not a The Murrumbidgee River Valley single industrial structure in the area except a few farm houses or sheds. The Murrumbidgee River valley (ie the river plus the U/V shaped valley in which it flows, up to the ridge line some 300 metres above the river), and especially the western/southern wall of the valley and ridge line (since this is what you see most from the eastern side) Being able to come to the area and feel so far removed from the every day world.
Mt Europe. Wee Jasper caves and environs. Wee Jasper township. Burrinjuck Dam. The valley scenery below Burrinjuck Dam. Natural Features I value the the quietness and serenity of the area. There is no man made building or structures apart Natural Landscape from a few huts by the river. Kayaking up the river and only hearing the crickets, the fish jumping out and the birds chirping. It is escape from the man made world we live in each day. The animals the reside on the land, the landscape of greenery and mountains, the river winding through all of this. I value very highly the complete absence of any built environment whatsoever visible from my house/ surrounds and from elsewhere on my property, the presence of nothing other than a few shacks/ farm buildings. I value the absence of any man-made noise, apart from the occasional vehicle or aircraft. As I write I can hear only birds. I value the river, the rugged terrain, and the flora and fauna inhabiting it. The valley is home to large Raptors such as Wedge Tail Eagles and Sea Eagles. The built Environment has existed for 90 years (the Dam)
APPENDIX D | COMMUNITY CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Question 6: What are the best lookouts / public viewing locations within the study area and Question 7: What concerns do you have (if any) in relation to how the Project might impact its surrounds? on the current aesthetic value and amenity? Kayaking along the river or Childowla Road. Burrinjuck Nature Reserve. The towers will be visible from most of the valley and the noise that they can create will impact on the serenity that the area currently enjoys. Beautiful Scenery on the private property we frequent for camping, relaxation and fishing, swimming A HUGE Impact on the environment not to mention the noise of the Wind Turbines which will have an during summer. See cattle and sheep in their natura!!!l environment, the Wind Turbines will have an immense impact on the human side as well, emotional, mental illness and deafness that's just some immense impact to the environment to the fauna and flora not to mention the effect of the domestic of the down side animals, cattle, sheep and goats as well as the wild animals running free. The best outlook is on the river as we paddle. Platypuses and birds are observed and the absence The project will destroy the aesthetic value and amenity of the area. Moreover I am intensely fearful of the built environment is the greatness view of the area. My understanding from the very limited for the bird life in the area. Also the impact of run off into the river and the potential rubbish from the information provided so far about the project is that the towers are extremely tall and I fear for the build phase of the towers. The ongoing risk of rubbish and other pollutants entering the river and the bird life and the potential rubbish that will enter the river. impact on the native fish and platypuses. Highest point on my property (good view of the upstream river and valley), to the river, along Childowla I am concerned that the eastern end of the line of turbines will detract from the natural beauty of the Rd. valley.
The river it self. The noise created by the towers and the complete eye saw that they are. We need to hold onto what little peace of natural areas we have left. Adding the towers with such size and not to mention noise completely takes away the natural state of the area.
Of course the Murrumbidgee River itself by boat, canoe and Kayak. The Valley riverbank to camp The possibility that these structures will be visible from the river bank and valley. This area has been and Burrinjuck Nature Reserve renowned as a beautiful spot from hundreds of years. People come to explore, camp, fish and enjoy being in nature where there is no visible sign of any industrial structures.
Burrinjuck Nature Reserve but the most common area would have to be the river itself. Many people These towers will be visible from all points of this natural beauty. It will completely destroy what come to boat, fish, canoe and camp across the river bank. people love most about coming here.
The most common public viewing locations are from the river itself (ie canoe/kayak/boat), the river The towers will be visible from the surrounding land. There is no industrial structures anywhere in the bank or Childowla Rd. Best is from the Burrinjuck Nature Reserve, but this takes some effort to area which is what makes the landscape and environment so serene and beautiful. It is what we all access. come to the area for. The height of these structures of 300+ m will be visible across the River Valley. It will permanently and significantly change the whole area. The best views will be from private property. Towers 21, 37, 10, and possibly others - you haven't provided enough information to be sure - will be visible from the River valley. Childowla has been considered a "beauty spot" for nearly 200 years, where one can enjoy nature without any consciousness of industrial presence. If these towers were to be constructed, the natural serenity of the environment would be permanently and substantially disfigured: I note the height of the towers is approximately the same as the height of the river valley itself! The towers would be visible from the northern approach to Glendale south ie including the whole of that part of Childowla Rd which is next to the river, and they would be impossible to ignore. We will have front row seats from our property and will see a number of towers. This will destroy the natural view we have of the valley.
APPENDIX D | COMMUNITY CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E Question 8: Additional comments and/or concerns:
The visual and audible impact of the towers will no doubt affect the value of the properties in the immediate area and people who have purchased these properties would have done so mostly due to the absence of industrial activity affecting the natural beauty of the area. As previous question.
I am totally opposed to this project.
In the most part I am in favour of renewable energy and can accept that they may need to be placed in my neighbourhood, but it would be a shame if a small number of them destroyed the outlook from my property and the surrounding area. I would like to see the end of this line, close to the river, taken out of the project as I believe there can be towers put in the location without destroying the natural beauty of the area. I believe having these structures will substantially decrease the amount of people that come to take in the surroundings and decrease the value of the land for the property owners.
I'm also concerned about the wild life in the area - destroying their habitat and particularly the birds.
The owners in the area have all bought their properties for their natural beauty and serenity of the river valley. The proposed wind farm will obstruct views and cause a substantial loss of value to these properties.
For people coming to the area to camp, fish and take in the landscape this will again drastically change what they have always come to see and experience.
All the land owners on the river near the proposed wind farm bought their properties for the natural beauty of the river valley. Turbines towering over the valley has got to have a substantial adverse effect on property values, and suitability for uses such as adventure tourism (fishing, walking, camping, kayaking etc). I'm also concerned about bird kill. We also believe this structure will decimate the birdlife as well as nocturnal birds and bats. The construction phase may well be threat to Endangered plants such as the Wee Jasper Grevillea which is only found in this area and nowhere else! We believe it poses a direct threat to the Powerful owl (an endangered species) and all other Owls. We also have concerns on the threat to the native bat colony from Wee Jasper caves.
APPENDIX D | COMMUNITY CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRE | JEREMIAH WIND FARM MOIR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | JUNE 2021 | FINAL REV E
CONTACT Canberra Newcastle Sydney Suite 1.01, Level 1 Level 2 Unit 11, Shore 2-3 17 Moore Street 2 Market Street 13 Hickson Road Canberra, ACT 2601 Newcastle, NSW 2300 Dawes Point, NSW 2000 Phone: +61 2 6100 2122 Phone: +61 2 4013 4640
cwprenewables.com
D Jeremiah Wind Farm 11/06/21