DOCSLIB.ORG

“WIDE-FM” (76.1~87.9 Mhz) AS a LONG- TERM SOLUTION for MIGRATING LOCAL AM BROADCAST STATIONS WHILE MAINTAINING a CRITICAL NATIONAL AM INFRASTRUCTURE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“WIDE-FM” (76.1~87.9 Mhz) AS a LONG- TERM SOLUTION for MIGRATING LOCAL AM BROADCAST STATIONS WHILE MAINTAINING a CRITICAL NATIONAL AM INFRASTRUCTURE REC Networks / REC ネットワーク Michelle (“Michi”) Bradley J1 Radio/J1 ラジオ 太田道子 11541 Riverton Wharf Rd Founder of REC/Director of J1 Radio Mardela Springs, MD 21837 REC 代表取締役 +1 202 621-2355 J1 ラジオ ディレクター http://www.recnet.com [email protected] http://www.J1FM.tokyo CHANNEL LOADING SIMULATIONS FOR “WIDE-FM” (76.1~87.9 MHz) AS A LONG- TERM SOLUTION FOR MIGRATING LOCAL AM BROADCAST STATIONS WHILE MAINTAINING A CRITICAL NATIONAL AM INFRASTRUCTURE. March 9, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Classes of Service 2 Allocation Reference Points 2 Protection of TV Broadcast Stations 2 Low Power TV Stations 2 Foreign TV Stations 2 Protection of FM Facilities 3 Protection Between Wide-FM Facilities 3 Assignment of Channels in the Border Areas 3 Assignment of FM Broadcast Band Channels (92.1~107.9 MHz) 3 Reserved Band 3 Priority of Assignment 4 Listing of AM stations by call letters and their study allocations 5 Table of Allotments – Scenario 1 (Protecting Full-Service Ch. 5 & 6) 83 Metro Dialscapes – Scenario 1 122 Table of Allotments – Scenario 2 (No TV Channel 5 & 6 protections) 159 Metro Dialscapes – Scenario 2 206 TV stations considered in this study 256 Critical Nighttime Infrastructure 258 1 2 INTRODUCTION This study was created as a part of REC Networks’ comments in MB Docket 19-311 which examines a “long term” solution for the survival of local AM radio licensees that are facing continued AM band degradation as a result of evolving technologies and evolving consumer attitudes in respect to AM radio. In this document, we run two different allocation studies, one that takes existing full-service TV channel 5 & 6 stations into consideration and one that does not. This is to demonstrate that, compared to the use of this spectrum for LPTV (and in the second study, LPTV and DTV) is a much more efficient use. CLASSES OF SERVICE For this study, we create two classes of FM stations: W1 6 kW at 100 meters HAAT with a 28 km 60 dBu service contour. Comparable with FM Class A. Class W1 will be assigned to all eligible AM stations that operate a daytime power of 1 kW or less. Class W1 will also be assigned to stations operating more than 1 kW if a previous round of the study shows that there are no 25 kW (W2) channels available. This would include stations that are between 250~288 km from a protected Channel 5 or 6 TV station in the first scenario. W2 25 kW at 100 meters HAAT with a 39 km 60 dBu service contour. Comparable with FM class C3. Class W2 will be assigned to eligible AM stations that operate a daytime power of more than 1 kW but less than 50 kW. FM “Zones” are not used in this concept. W2 stations are always protected to the 60 dBu service contour regardless of geographic location. ALLOCATION REFERENCE POINTS Reference points that are used for the new facilities are based on an allotment reference coordinate, normally the coordinates shown in the U.S. Census Bureau’s Gazetteer and therefore, they do not reflect the proposed station’s actual transmitter site. Locations of existing FM and TV broadcast stations are based on their actual transmitter location. PROTECTION OF TV BROADCAST STATIONS In the first scenario, we attempt to load each station but still providing the following protections to existing FM and full-service DTV channel 5 and 6 stations. • Class W1 stations will protect DTV stations by a minimum of 250 kilometers. • Class W2 stations will protect DTV stations by a minimum of 288 kilometers. These distances were calculated by using the class standard distance of the FM station’s 34 dBu F[50, 10] interfering contour with the DTV station’s 28 dBu F[50, 90] noise-limited service contour. We acknowledge that this is a massive overprotection and as demonstrated by the “franken-FM” LPTV stations, operation closer to a co-channel DTV station may be possible but for the sake of overprotection, we will use these distances in the study. LOW POWER TV STATIONS There are over 100 Low Power TV (LPTV) stations operating in this spectrum, some digital and some analog. LPTV stations are secondary and they were applied for and granted under the full knowledge that their service is secondary and would be subject to displacement. Neither scenario protects any LPTV stations. FOREIGN TV STATIONS REC has identified 29 full-service TV stations in Canada. Only a few are in the border area. These TV stations will be protected in this report in a manner similar to U.S. full-service DTV stations. Low Power stations are secondary, and no protection is being offered in the first 3 scenario. There are currently no TV channel 5 or 6 stations in Mexico that would have any impact on this report. Canada TV data is provided by Industry Canada and Mexico data is provided by IFT and are both effective as of February, 2020. PROTECTION OF FM FACILITIES For full-service FM stations in the USA, Canada and Mexico, these facilities will be protected using the same distance separations outlined in §73.207 of the rules using the following comparable service classes: Wide FM class FCC FM class Canada FM class Mexico FM class W1 A B1 AA W2 C3 B1 B1 LPFM and FM translator stations, being secondary services are not protected in this study. We do note though that since commercial band FM channels were only assigned in rural areas, the impacts to LPFM stations will be minimal. PROTECTION BETWEEN WIDE-FM FACILITIES Class W1 and W2 stations will protect each other similar to the §73.207 protections for Class A and C3 stations except that third-adjacent channel protection is not prescribed. Relation Co-channel First-adj Second-adj Third-adj IF W1 to W1 115 72 31 none 10 W1 to W2 142 89 42 none 12 W2 to W1 142 89 42 none 12 W2 to W2 153 99 43 none 14 ASSIGNMENT OF CHANNELS IN THE BORDER AREAS In order to assure that Mexico and Canada can have opportunities for new Wide-FM stations within their jurisdictions, the program will block out 30 of the 60 channels in areas where reference coordinates are within 150 kilometers of the border. Under spectrum sharing: 79.1~81.9 (156~170) and 85.1~87.9 (186~199) are available to the USA. 76.1~78.9 (141~155) and 82.1~84.9 (171~185) are available to Mexico and Canada. ASSIGNMENT OF FM BROADCAST BAND CHANNELS (92.1~107.9 MHz) For each AM facility evaluated, the program will first attempt to assign the channel in the commercial FM broadcast band. The study managed to assign 127 such facilities in the first scenario (with TV protections) and 56 in the second scenario. All AM stations in Guam and the Northern Marianas were given FM broadcast band channels. RESERVED BAND No assignments were made in the reserved band (88.1~91.9). 4 PRIORITY OF ASSIGNMENT For both scenarios, channels were allocated to AM facilities in the following rounds: Round 1 New class All Class C AM stations by ascending order of daytime power W1 facilities and then by descending order of population in the allotment community. Round 2 New class Class D stations that have a daytime power of 1 kW or less. W1 facilities Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Round 3 New class Class D stations that have a daytime power exceeding 1 kW and W2 facilities a nighttime power of less than (but not equal to) 5 kW. Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Round 4 New Class Class D stations that exceed 1kW daytime power that were W1 facilities unable to find a W2 channel in Round 3. Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Round 5 New Class Class B stations that have a daytime power of 1 kW or less. W1 facilities Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Round 6 New Class Class B stations that a daytime power exceeding 1 kW and a W2 facilities nighttime power of less than (but not equal to) 5 kW. Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Round 7 New Class Class B stations that exceed 1kW daytime power that were W1 facilities unable to find a W2 channel in Round 6. Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Round 8 New class Class B stations that exceed or are equal to 5 kW daytime power W2 facilities and a nighttime power of less than (but not equal to ) 10 kW. Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Round 9 New class Class B stations that have a nighttime power of at least 10 kW W2 facilities but less than (and not equal to) 50 kW. Ordered by daytime power, then by nighttime power and then by descending population in the allotment community. Channel selection was determined by calculating the distance to the closest wide-FM allotment on co-channel and then assigning the channel with the closest (but properly spaced) wide-FM allotment. A more efficient method of assignment could allow more allotments to be placed into the band.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DFW Media Guide Table of Contents
    DFW Media Guide Table of Contents Introduction..................2 KHKS ........................ 14 KRVA ........................ 21 PR Tips and Tricks......... 2 KHYI ......................... 14 KSKY ........................ 22 Resources .....................3 KICI.......................... 14 KSTV......................... 22 Templates ................... 3 KJCR......................... 14 KTBK ........................ 22 Public Service KKDA ........................ 15 KTCK ........................ 22 Announcements............ 3 KKMR........................ 15 KTNO ........................ 22 PSA Format .............. 3 KLNO ........................ 15 KXEB ........................ 22 Tips for KLTY ......................... 15 KZEE......................... 22 Submitting PSAs....... 5 KLUV ........................ 15 KZMP ........................ 22 Press Releases ............. 6 KMEO........................ 15 WBAP........................ 22 Considerations KMQX........................ 15 Newspapers ............... 23 to Keep in Mind ......... 6 KNON........................ 15 Allen American ........... 23 Background Work ...... 6 KNTU ........................ 16 Alvarado Post ............. 23 Tips for Writing KOAI......................... 16 Alvarado Star ............. 23 a Press Release ......... 8 KPLX......................... 16 Azle News.................. 23 Tips for Sending KRBV ........................ 16 Benbrook Star ............ 23 a Press Release ......... 8 KRNB ........................ 16 Burleson Star ............. 23 Helpful
    [Show full text]
  • SAGA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    2017 Annual Report 2017 Annual Letter To our fellow shareholders: Every now and then I am introduced to someone who knows, kind of, who I am and what I do and they instinctively ask, ‘‘How are things at Saga?’’ (they pronounce it ‘‘say-gah’’). I am polite and correct their pronunciation (‘‘sah-gah’’) as I am proud of the word and its history. This is usually followed by, ‘‘What is a ‘‘sah-gah?’’ My response is that there are several definitions — a common one from 1857 deems a ‘‘Saga’’ as ‘‘a long, convoluted story.’’ The second one that we prefer is ‘‘an ongoing adventure.’’ That’s what we are. Next they ask, ‘‘What do you do there?’’ (pause, pause). I, too, pause, as by saying my title doesn’t really tell what I do or what Saga does. In essence, I tell them that I am in charge of the wellness of the Company and overseer and polisher of the multiple brands of radio stations that we have. Then comes the question, ‘‘Radio stations are brands?’’ ‘‘Yes,’’ I respond. ‘‘A consistent allusion can become a brand. Each and every one of our radio stations has a created personality that requires ongoing care. That is one of the things that differentiates us from other radio companies.’’ We really care about the identity, ambiance, and mission of each and every station that belongs to Saga. We have radio stations that have been on the air for close to 100 years and we have radio stations that have been created just months ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice >> Licensing and Management System Admin >>
    REPORT NO. PN-2-210125-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 01/25/2021 Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 ACTIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq. City, State Applicant or Licensee Status Date Status 0000122670 Renewal of FM KLWL 176981 Main 88.1 CHILLICOTHE, MO CSN INTERNATIONAL 01/21/2021 Granted License From: To: 0000123755 Renewal of FM KCOU 28513 Main 88.1 COLUMBIA, MO The Curators of the 01/21/2021 Granted License University of Missouri From: To: 0000123699 Renewal of FL KSOZ-LP 192818 96.5 SALEM, MO Salem Christian 01/21/2021 Granted License Catholic Radio From: To: 0000123441 Renewal of FM KLOU 9626 Main 103.3 ST. LOUIS, MO CITICASTERS 01/21/2021 Granted License LICENSES, INC. From: To: 0000121465 Renewal of FX K244FQ 201060 96.7 ELKADER, IA DESIGN HOMES, INC. 01/21/2021 Granted License From: To: 0000122687 Renewal of FM KNLP 83446 Main 89.7 POTOSI, MO NEW LIFE 01/21/2021 Granted License EVANGELISTIC CENTER, INC From: To: Page 1 of 146 REPORT NO. PN-2-210125-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 01/25/2021 Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 ACTIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq. City, State Applicant or Licensee Status Date Status 0000122266 Renewal of FX K217GC 92311 Main 91.3 NEVADA, MO CSN INTERNATIONAL 01/21/2021 Granted License From: To: 0000122046 Renewal of FM KRXL 34973 Main 94.5 KIRKSVILLE, MO KIRX, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern Community Radio
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 73.3556 of the ) MB Docket No. 19-310 Commission’s Rules Regarding Duplication of ) Programming on Commonly Owned Radio Stations ) ) Modernization of Media Regulation ) MB Docket No. 17-105 Initiative ) Reply Comments of Kern Community Radio This reply comment is from nonprofit Kern Community Radio (“Kern”). Kern is a prospective non-commercial community broadcaster in Bakersfield, California. Kern is supplying this comment to shed light on the reality of how duplicated- and rebroadcast- programming is an epidemic. Redundant and relayed programming is hollowing-out local radio, vastly reducing programming diversity, and frustrating diverse new broadcast entrants. This reply is being filed as a response to National Association of Broadcasters’ (“NAB”) comment stating that diversity has increased on the dail, advocating the lift of the duplication rule. Kern provides proof in this reply that the program duplication rules need to be expanded to ensure local programming diversity and allow for new entrants. About Kern Community Radio Members of Kern Community Radio had desired to pursue a non-commercial, educational community radio station for Bakersfield in 2006 due to the total absence of any local local secular non-commercial radio. Bakersfield, a metropolitan area of roughly 840,000 people, does not have one local-studio secular, non-commercial radio station. That includes no secular LPFM, no local-content NPR station,1 no community station, or no college station. The entire non-commercial FM band except for one station is all relayed via satellite from chiefly religious broadcasters from Texas, Idaho, and Northern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Forest Service Grant / Agrreement No
    PROGRESS REPORT FOREST SERVICE GRANT / AGRREEMENT NO. 13-DG-11132540-413 Period covered by this report: 04/01/2014—05/31/2015 Issued to: Center of Southwest Culture, Inc. Address: 505 Marquette Avenue, NW, Suite 1610 Project Name: Arboles Comunitarios Contact Person/Principal Investigator Name: Arturo Sandoval Phone Number: 505.247.2729 Fax Number: 505.243-1257 E-Mail Address: [email protected] Web Site Address (if applicable): www.arbolescomunitarios.com Date of Award: 03/27/2013 Grant Modifications: Date of Expiration: 05/31/2015 Funding: Federal Share: $95,000 plus Grantee Share: $300,000 = Total Project: $395,000 Budget Sheet: FS Grant Manager: Nancy Stremple / Address: 1400 Independence Ave SW, Yates building (3 Central) Washington, DC 20250-1151 Phone Number: 202/309-9873 Albuquerque Service Center (ASC) Send a copy to: Albuquerque Service Center Payments – Grants & Agreements 101B Sun Ave NE Albuquerque, NM 87109 EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: 877-687-4894 Project abstract (as defined by initial proposal and contract): Arboles Comunitarios is proposed under Innovation Grant Category 1 as a national Spanish language education program. By utilizing the expertise of the Center of Southwest Culture community and urban forestry partners along with the targeted outreach capacity of Hispanic Communications Network, this project will communicate the connection between the personal benefits of urban forest and quality of life in a manner that resonates specifically with the Hispanic community. Project objectives: • Bilingual website with
    [Show full text]
  • Houston-Galveston, Texas Managing Coastal Subsidence
    HOUSTON-GALVESTON, TEXAS Managing coastal subsidence TEXAS he greater Houston area, possibly more than any other Lake Livingston A N D S metropolitan area in the United States, has been adversely U P L L affected by land subsidence. Extensive subsidence, caused T A S T A mainly by ground-water pumping but also by oil and gas extraction, O C T r has increased the frequency of flooding, caused extensive damage to Subsidence study area i n i t y industrial and transportation infrastructure, motivated major in- R i v vestments in levees, reservoirs, and surface-water distribution facili- e S r D N ties, and caused substantial loss of wetland habitat. Lake Houston A L W O Although regional land subsidence is often subtle and difficult to L detect, there are localities in and near Houston where the effects are Houston quite evident. In this low-lying coastal environment, as much as 10 L Galveston feet of subsidence has shifted the position of the coastline and A Bay T changed the distribution of wetlands and aquatic vegetation. In fact, S A Texas City the San Jacinto Battleground State Historical Park, site of the battle O Galveston that won Texas independence, is now partly submerged. This park, C Gulf of Mexico about 20 miles east of downtown Houston on the shores of Galveston Bay, commemorates the April 21, 1836, victory of Texans 0 20 Miles led by Sam Houston over Mexican forces led by Santa Ana. About 0 20 Kilometers 100 acres of the park are now under water due to subsidence, and A road (below right) that provided access to the San Jacinto Monument was closed due to flood- ing caused by subsidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1538
    Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1538 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 73.202(b), ) MM Docket No. 01-63 Table of Allotments, ) RM-10075 FM Broadcast Stations. ) (Kingman and Dolan Springs, Arizona) ) REPORT AND ORDER (Proceeding Terminated) Adopted: June 20, 2001 Released: June 29, 2001 By the Chief, Allocations Branch: 1. Before the Commission for consideration is the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (“Notice”), (DA 01-561), released March 2, 2001, issued in response to a petition for rule making filed on behalf of Hualapai Broadcasters, Inc. (“petitioner”), licensee of Station KRCY, Channel 224C1, Kingman, Arizona, 1 proposing the substitution of Channel 224C for Channel 224C1 at Kingman, the reallotment of Channel 224C to Dolan Springs, Arizona, and modification of the license of Station KRCY accordingly. Petitioner filed supporting comments in response to the Notice. No other comments were received. 2. As stated in the Notice, the petitioner filed its request pursuant to the provisions of Section 1.420(i) of the Commission’s Rules which permits the modification of a station’s authorization to specify a new community of license without affording other interested parties an opportunity to file competing expressions of interest.2 The proposed reallotment of Channel 224C to Dolan Springs, which is not within an urbanized area, is mutually exclusive with the petitioner’s current authorization at Kingman. The distance between the two communities is 62.6 kilometers (38.9 miles) whereas 270 kilometers (167.8 miles) is required in this instance. Further, petitioner stated that the reallotment would result in a preferential arrangement of allotments by providing Dolan Springs with its second 1 At the time the Notice herein was issued, Station KRCY had been modified from Channel 290C1 to Channel 224C1 at Kingman in MM Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • 07-77817-02 Final Report Dickinson Bayou
    Dickinson Bayou Watershed Protection Plan February 2009 Dickinson Bayou Watershed Partnership 1 PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The preparation of this report was financed though grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................. 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 10 SUMMARY OF MILESTONES ........................................................................................................................ 13 FORWARD ................................................................................................................................................... 17 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 The Dickinson Bayou Watershed ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • S Application for an Order Finding the D
    APSC FILED Time: 9/28/2018 3:53:22 PM: Recvd 9/28/2018 3:52:47 PM: Docket 16-060-U-Doc. 110 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF ENTERGY ) ARKANSAS, INC.’S APPLICATION FOR ) AN ORDER FINDING THE DEPLOYMENT ) DOCKET NO. 16-060-U OF ADVANCED METERING ) INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE IN THE ) PUBLIC INTEREST AND EXEMPTION ) FROM CERTAIN APPLICABLE RULES JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CUSTOMER EDUCATION PLAN FOR ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. Come now Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (“EAI” or the “Company”); the General Staff (“Staff”) of the Arkansas Public Service Commission (“APSC” or the “Commission”); and the Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division of the Attorney General’s Office (“AG”) (hereinafter collectively, the “Settling Parties”), and for their Joint Motion (“Joint Motion”) to Approve the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Customer Education Plan for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (“Customer Education Plan”) state as follows: 1. On August 11, 2017, the Settling Parties filed a Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement”) to inform the Commission that they had reached agreement on all issues in Docket No. 16-060-U. The Agreement set forth various commitments made by the Company pursuant to which Staff and the AG support that EAI’s deployment of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (“AMI”) is in the public interest. 2. On October 30, 2017, the Commission issued Order No. 8 finding that the Agreement and EAI’s deployment of AMI are in the public interest. The 1 APSC FILED Time: 9/28/2018 3:53:22 PM: Recvd 9/28/2018 3:52:47 PM: Docket 16-060-U-Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice >> Licensing and Management System Admin >>
    REPORT NO. PN-1-200204-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 02/04/2020 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 APPLICATIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq. City, State Applicant or Licensee Status Date Status 0000104614 Renewal of FM WZYQ 191535 Main 101.7 MOUND BAYOU, FENTY FUSS 02/03/2020 Accepted License MS For Filing 0000104644 Renewal of FM WLAU 52618 Main 99.3 HEIDELBERG, MS TELESOUTH 02/03/2020 Accepted License COMMUNICATIONS, For Filing INC. 0000104223 Renewal of FM WKIS 64001 Main 99.9 BOCA RATON, FL ENTERCOM 01/31/2020 Received License LICENSE, LLC Amendment 0000104700 Renewal of FM KQKI-FM 64675 Main 95.3 BAYOU VISTA, LA Teche Broadcasting 02/03/2020 Accepted License Corporation For Filing 0000104619 Renewal of AM KAAY 33253 Main 1090.0 LITTLE ROCK, AR RADIO LICENSE 02/03/2020 Accepted License HOLDING CBC, LLC For Filing 0000103459 Renewal of FX K237GR 154564 95.3 JOHNSON, AR HOG RADIO, INC. 01/31/2020 Accepted License For Filing 0000103767 Renewal of AM WGSV 25675 Main 1270.0 GUNTERSVILLE, GUNTERSVILLE 01/31/2020 Received License AL BROADCASTING Amendment COMPANY, INC. 0000104204 Renewal of FM WQMP 73137 Main 101.9 DAYTONA BEACH ENTERCOM 01/31/2020 Received License , FL LICENSE, LLC Amendment Page 1 of 33 REPORT NO. PN-1-200204-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 02/04/2020 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 APPLICATIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq.
    [Show full text]
  • KFLG(AM), KFLG-FM, KNKK(FM), KLUK(FM), KAAA(AM), KZZZ(AM) EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT June 1, 2017 – May 31, 2018
    KFLG(AM), KFLG-FM, KNKK(FM), KLUK(FM), KAAA(AM), KZZZ(AM) EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT June 1, 2017 – May 31, 2018 I. VACANCY LIST See Section II, the “Master Recruitment Source List” (“MRSL”) for recruitment source data Recruitment Sources (“RS”) RS Referring Job Title Used to Fill Vacancy Hiree Account Executive – Bullhead City 1-33 10 Account Executive - Kingman 1-33 30 KFLG(AM), KFLG-FM, KNKK(FM), KLUK(FM), KAAA(AM), KZZZ(AM) EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT June 1, 2017 – May 31, 2018 II. MASTER RECRUITMENT SOURCE LIST (“MRSL”) Source Entitled No. of Interviewees RS Referred by RS RS Information to Vacancy Number Notification? Over (Yes/No) Reporting Period 1. www.allaccess.com N 0 2. American Women in Radio N 0 8405 Greensboro Drive, Suite 800 Mclean, VA 22102 703-506-3290 www.awrt.org [email protected] 3. Area Agency on Aging N 0 Attention: Alexandria Fulford 1366 E. Thomas Road Phoenix, AZ 85014 602.264.2255 Email: [email protected] www.aaaphx.com 4. Arizona Broadcasters Association N 0 426 N. 44th Street, Suite #310 Phoenix, AZ 85008 www.azbroadcasters.org [email protected] 5. Arizona Equal Opportunity N 0 100 North Fifteenth Ave. Suite #261 602-542-3711 Azgovernor.gov/eop [email protected] 6. Arizona State University College @ Lake Havasu N 0 100 University Way Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403 928-854-9708 www.havasu.asu.edu 7. Arizona Women’s Ed & Employment (AWEE) N 0 914 W. Hatcher Road Phoenix, AZ 85021 602-223-4338 www.awee.org [email protected] Source Entitled No.
    [Show full text]
  • Presque Isle, Maine Comprehensive Plan a Guide to Future Growth and Resource Conservation 2007 Presque Isle (Me.)
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 2007 Presque Isle, Maine Comprehensive Plan a Guide to Future Growth and Resource Conservation 2007 Presque Isle (Me.) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs Repository Citation Presque Isle (Me.), "Presque Isle, Maine Comprehensive Plan a Guide to Future Growth and Resource Conservation 2007" (2007). Maine Town Documents. 760. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs/760 This Plan is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Town Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. City of Presque Isle, Maine 2007 Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents I.) Vision Statement – summarizes desired community character in terms of economic development, natural & cultural resources, transportation, land uses and Community role within the region.- Page 1 II.) Public Participation Summary- Planning Board efforts to involve public, information sources (input from City departments, City committees, other state & local agencies & public hearings) – Page 1 III.) Regional Coordination- Local involvement in NMDC activities & efforts, L.E.A.D. activities & US Rt.#1 Corridor Management efforts, as example-Page 1 IV.) Core Data, Information & Analysis • Future Land Use Plan - Pages 2 to 16 • Land Use - Pages 17 to 47 • Population & Demographics - Pages 48 to 59 • Economy - Pages 60 to 75 • Housing - Pages 76 to 91 • Transportation - Pages 92 to 121 • Recreation - Pages 122 to 137 • Natural Resources - Pages 138 to 169 i. Water Resources ii. Critical Natural Resources iii.
    [Show full text]