Corella, 2005, 29(4): 97-98
A COMMENT ON SOME ERRORS IN THE LITERATURE REGARDING AUSTRALIAN OWLS
A review of the Duncan (2003) book Owls of the World Australian forms of boobook, mainland and Tasmanian, (Debus 2004), and subsequent responses to it, highlight and there is no suggestion that they are different species. some errors in the literature on Australasian owls, including So far as the molecular data [are] concerned, Australia several in the Handbook of the Birds of the World (HBW; (including Tasmania), Norfolk Island and New Zealand del Hoyo et al. 1999) that were overlooked in a review of share the one species of Boobook Owl, Ninox that book by Debus (200 I). These errors particularly novaeseelandiae. concern the ecology of the Southern Boobook Ninox HANZAB (Higgins 1999) rightly combined the boobooks, 11ovaeseela11diae and the taxonomic status of its regional and Newton er al. (2002) followed suit for Australian forms. species. The issue is critical because boobooks are the only HBW gave the home-range size of the Southern Boobook Australian raptor (subspecies) we have lost, so it is doubly as 8 hectares, with 37 hectares the upper limit. However, important to be clear about taxonomic relationships within Olsen and Trost ( 1997) claimed at least 50 to I00 hectares, boobooks. later confirmed by Olsen and Taylor (200 I) as 122 On the basis of colour-marked and radio-tracked hectares. H BW was also incorrect on eye colour ( 'yellow, Boobooks, Olsen and Trost (1997), Olsen and Taylor possibly brown') of the Sumba Boobook Ninox rudolfi, (200 I) and Olsen et al. (2002a,b) challenged several long whereas Konig et al. ( I999) ('brown') was not; Konig et held assumptions about Australian owls, in particular the al. correctly described the song of this owl as a 'series belief that Boobook pairs duet (in the strict sense of the of ... short . . cough-like notes', but HBW thought it to word). Although these new data and interpretations were be a threat call (see Olsen, Wink, Sauer-GUrth and Trost reluctantly accepted in Australia (e.g. Higgins 1999), no 2002). owl biologist has responded with any data to the contrary. The most significant error concerns the split, by both In Australia we seldom see the sorts of debates and HBW and Konig er al., of the Southern Boobook into two rejoinders about papers, such as appear in North American species. the Australian mainland N. boobook versus the and European journals. One could reasonably ask whether Morepork N. 11ovaeseelandiae of New Zealand, Norfolk such a situation is good for Australian science. Island (subspecies 1111dulata) and Tasmania (subspecies leucopsis). This split was based on a misinterpretation of DNA evidence presented by Norman et al. ( I988a,b), REFERENCES pointed out in an American review (Roberson 2000): Debus. S. (2001). Review of ·Handbook of the Birds of the World". Vol. 5. At1.1"t. Bird Watrha 19: 75-77 . . . .the authors [of HBWJ misconstrued published papers on biochemical evidence which do not support the split Debus. S. (2002). Distribution, taxonomy. status and major threatening processes of owls of 1he Australasian region. In Newton et al. (2002), of the Boobook of Australia from the Morepork of New Pp. 355-363 Zealand; indeed. the papers cited came to tne opposite conclusion! In any case. it is inappropriate for a Debus. S. (2004). Review of ·Owls of the World'. Emu 104: 91-93. reference work like this to present these splits as fairs de! Hoyo, J .• Ellioit. A. and Sargatal. J. (Eds) (1999). ·Handbook of accompli without any real peer review. the Birds of the World, Volume 5, Barn-owls to I fummingbirds". (Lynx Edic1ons: Barcelona.) The Norman el al. papers have generated some confusion Duncan, J. R. (2003). "Owls of lhc World: Their Lives. Behaviour and (e.g. Debus 2002) over where the evidence was for the Survival". (Key Porter Books: Toronto. Canada.) split, given th:.it their DNA evidence indicated that 1111d11law. nominate 1w1·aeseela11diae and leucopsis from Higgins, I'. J. (Ed.) (1999). 'HandbooJ.. of Australian. i'
97 98 J. Olsen and S. J. S. Debus: Comment on Australian Owls literature Corella 24(4)
Olsen, J. and Trost, S. ( 1997). Territorial and nesting behaviour in Penhallurick, J. M. (2002). The taxonomy and conservation status Southern Boobook Ni11ox 11ovaeseela11diae. In 'Biology and of the owls of the world: A review. In Newton et al. (2002), Pp. Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere: Second 341-354. Symposium'. (Eds J. R. Duncan. D. H. Johnson and T. H. Nicholls). Pp. 308-313. General Technical Report NC-190. (USDA Forest Roberson, D. (2000). Review of 'Handbook of the Birds of the World', Service: St Paul, Minnesota.) Vol. 5. Birding 32: 468-470. Olsen, J.. Marcot. 8. G. and Trost, S. (2002a). Do Southern Boobooks (Ni,wx 11ovaeseela11diae) duet? In Newton et al. (2002), Pp. 320-328. Jerry Olsen 1 and S. J. S. Debus2 1 Olsen, J ., Trost. S. and Hayes, G. (2002b). Vocalisations used by Applied Ecology Research Group, Southern Boobooks (Ni11ox 11ovaeseela11diae) in the Australian Capital University of Canberra, ACT 2601 Territory. In Newton et al. (2002), Pp. 305-319. 2Division of Zoology, University of New England, Olsen, J.• Wink, M., Sauer-Giirth. H. and Trost, S. (2002). A new Ninox Armidale, NSW 235 l owl from Sumba, Indonesia. Emu 102: 223-231.
BOOK REVIEW
Field Guide to Australian Birds: Complete Compact Edition This version brings forward the unique user-friendly concepts from its larger predecessor. The text, identification information and updated Michael Morcombe, Steve Parish Publishing Pty Ltd, Archerfield. distribution maps are placed around the illustration for each species, 384 Pp. rrp $34.95 so the complete account for each species appears on one page only. This field guide also introduces another unique feature - it has a ribbon This book is basically a rehash of Morcombe's unique Field Guide page marker. so you do not lose your place when you put the book to Australian Birds that was published in 2000. but this is a "pocket down for another squiz through your binoculars. size·· fonnal field guide, albeit for very big pockets. The Compact Edition is a very good, conveniently sized field guide It contains most of the information that was included in the larger and companion for the binocular-toting bird enthusiast and a copy formal book, though the introduction is shorter and the valuable section belongsin the backpack, or car, more than in the home reference library. on nest and eggs and Australian territorial island species have been I commend it 10 casual bird observers, dedicated bird watchers and field omitted to facilitate the smaller format. The useful colour coded cross ornithologists alike. referencing and indexing systems developed for the original book have been brought forward 10 this version of the field guide. Morcombe has J. W. Hardy included minor updates and feedback from birders that related to the earlier book.