DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Standards and Specifications.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Standards and Specifications.Pdf GEOL_UNITS.PAT........................................................................................................................... 3 ROCK NAME................................................................................................................................ 4 AGE ............................................................................................................................................... 5 ROCK GROUP.............................................................................................................................. 8 ROCK CLASS............................................................................................................................... 9 GEOL_UNITS.AAT........................................................................................................................ 10 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 11 BOUNDARY TYPE.................................................................................................................... 12 MINERALMET.PAT ...................................................................................................................... 13 METAMORPHIC MINERAL FACIES (grade list).................................................................... 14 AGE ............................................................................................................................................. 15 MINERALMET.AAT...................................................................................................................... 18 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 19 TEXTURALMET.PAT ................................................................................................................... 20 TEXTURAL METAMORPHIC ZONE ...................................................................................... 21 AGE ............................................................................................................................................. 22 TEXTURALMET.AAT................................................................................................................... 25 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 26 METAMORPHIC TEXTURAL ISOTECT ................................................................................ 27 FAULTS.AAT ................................................................................................................................. 28 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 30 FAULT SENSE OF MOVEMENT ............................................................................................. 31 PLOT RANK ............................................................................................................................... 32 FAULT TYPE.............................................................................................................................. 33 DIP DIRECTION......................................................................................................................... 34 DIP ............................................................................................................................................... 35 AGE ............................................................................................................................................. 36 FAULT SLIP ............................................................................................................................... 39 FAULT DOWN THROWN SIDE............................................................................................... 40 FOLDS.AAT.................................................................................................................................... 41 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 42 FOLD TYPE ................................................................................................................................ 43 FOLD FACING ........................................................................................................................... 44 FOLD PLUNGE .......................................................................................................................... 45 DIP DIRECTION......................................................................................................................... 46 DIP ............................................................................................................................................... 47 FOLD FACING ........................................................................................................................... 48 FOLD VERGENCE..................................................................................................................... 49 FOLD SURFACE ........................................................................................................................ 50 AGE ............................................................................................................................................. 51 PLOT RANK ............................................................................................................................... 54 HORIZONS.AAT ............................................................................................................................ 55 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 56 ROCK NAME.............................................................................................................................. 57 PLOT RANK ............................................................................................................................... 58 AGE ............................................................................................................................................. 59 ROCK GROUP............................................................................................................................ 62 ROCK CLASS............................................................................................................................. 63 VEINS.AAT..................................................................................................................................... 64 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 65 MINERALS ................................................................................................................................. 66 DIP DIRECTION......................................................................................................................... 68 DIP ............................................................................................................................................... 69 AGE ............................................................................................................................................. 70 PLOT RANK ............................................................................................................................... 73 DIKES.AAT..................................................................................................................................... 74 FEATURE ACCURACY ............................................................................................................ 75 ROCK NAME.............................................................................................................................. 76 DIP DIRECTION......................................................................................................................... 78 DIP ............................................................................................................................................... 79 AGE ............................................................................................................................................. 80 LINEARS.AAT ............................................................................................................................... 83 LINEAMENT ACCURACY....................................................................................................... 84 LINEAMENT TYPE ................................................................................................................... 85 STRUCTURE.PAT.......................................................................................................................... 86 STRUCTURE TYPE ................................................................................................................... 87 PLOT RANK ............................................................................................................................... 89 SOURCES.AAT .............................................................................................................................. 90 GEOL_UNITS.PAT MAPPABLE GEOLOGICAL POLYGONS ITEM NAME INPUT OUTPUT ITEM DECIMAL DESCRIPTION WIDTH WIDTH TYPE PLACES UNIT_CODE 8 8 C A mapping unit letter code eg, eMimt MAIN_ROCK 32 32 C A rock type from the rock names
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution
    HANDBOOK FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY IN THE U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM. Part i.—Geognosy.—The materials of the earth's crust. By George P. Merrill, Curator. INTRODUCTORY. The history of the Geological Department of the National Museum may he said to date from the appointment of Dr. George W. Hawes as curator in 1880, after the completion of the new building. Prior to this time, owing to the limited amount of space that could be devoted to the department in the Smithsonian building, the collections were necessarily small. They were also of a very miscellaneous character, the principal material of real value from a lithologic or geologic stand- point which they were found to contain being a collection of 300 speci- mens of rocks from France, purchased in 1869 from Louis Saeman in Paris, and a similar collection of 148 specimens of rocks of Saxony, received in 1863 from the Eoyal Mining School of Freiberg, Saxony. There was, it is true, much material that might have been of value had there been any accurate data concerning it ; but owing to the necessarily limited time and space that had been devoted to the care of these col- lections, in many cases nothing could be learned in regard to them, or if anything, the information was so meager as to be practically value- less. This was especially true of much of the material received from the various United States geological surveys and exploring expeditions. At the time Dr. Hawes entered upon his duties as curator he also assumed charge of that branch of the Tenth Census relating to the quarrying industry of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/65/1/39/3441385/I0016-7606-65-1-39.Pdf by Guest on 27 September 2021 40 R
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 65, PP. 39-70. 2 FIGS. JANUARY 1954 TRACE ELEMENTS OF VOLCANIC ULTRABASIC POTASSIC ROCKS OF SOUTHWESTERN UGANDA AND ADJOINING PART OF THE BELGIAN CONGO BY RIAD A. HIGAZY ABSTRACT The volcanic fields of Southwest Uganda and the adjoining part of the Belgian Congo are characterized by ultrabasic potassic rocks. The principal rock types are katungite, ugandite, and mafurite. Katungite is rich in melUite but free from augite; its potash is mainly in glass. Ugandite and mafurite contain augite, but their dominant feldspathoids are leucite and kalsilite respectively. Olivine is present in these three types. The investigated rocks also include members of the potash ankaratrite-mela-leucitite series, olivine melili- tite, kivite or leucite basanite, and limburgite. The constituents of the pyroclasts include fragments of prevolcanic crustal rocks and a subvolcanic suite of rocks consisting of various combinations of augite, biotite, and olivine. Representatives of both groups occur in the lavas as xenoliths and xenocrysts. The chemical compositions and trace-element contents of the different types are discussed. They are relatively rich in K2O, TiCfe, and P205 and characterized by having K20 > Na20 and Al2Os > (K20 + Na2O). They possess relatively high abundance of trace elements uncommon in ultrabasic rocks—namely, Sr, Ba, Rb, and Zr. It is shown that neither the crystallization differentiation nor the limestone-assimilation hypothesis can explain the peculiar geochemical features of the examined rocks. It is suggested that they originated by reactions between carbonatite magma which contributed Ca with Sr, La, and Y; Mg with Cr and Ni; Fe with V and Ti; and P; and sialic crustal rocks which provided Si; Al with Ga; and K with Rb and Ba.
    [Show full text]
  • Global and National Soils and Terrain Digital Databases (SOTER)
    Global and National Soils and Terrain Digital Databases (SOTER) Procedures Manual Version 2.0 ISRIC Report 2013/04 ISRIC – World Soil Information has a mandate to serve the international community as custodian of global soil information and to increase awareness and understanding of soils in major global issues. More information: www.isric.org V.W.P. van Engelen and J.A. Dijkshoorn ISRIC – World Soil Information has a strategic association with Wageningen UR (University & Research centre) Global and National Soils and Terrain Digital Databases (SOTER) Procedures Manual Version 2.0 V.W.P. van Engelen and J.A. Dijkshoorn ISRIC Report 2013/04 Wageningen, May 2013 © 2013, ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen, Netherlands All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination for educational or non-commercial purposes are permitted without any prior written permission provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of materials for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from ISRIC. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Director, ISRIC – World Soil Information PO B0X 353 6700 AJ Wageningen The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] The designations employed and the presentation of materials do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ISRIC concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure that the data are accurate and reliable, ISRIC cannot assume liability for damages caused by inaccuracies in the data or as a result of the failure of the data to function on a particular system.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrography of Alkaline Volcanic-Subvolcanic Rocks from the Brazilian Fernando De Noronha Archipelago, Southern Atlantic Ocean
    PETROGRAPHY OF ALKALINE VOLCANIC-SUBVOLCANIC ROCKS FROM THE BRAZILIAN FERNANDO DE NORONHA ARCHIPELAGO, SOUTHERN ATLANTIC OCEAN M.N,C .U1brich KEY-WORDS: oceanic is!ands, petrography of alkaline rocks, Fernando de Noronha, dikes and flows ULBRlCH, M .N.C. (1993) Petrography of alkaline volcanic-subvolcanic roeu from the Brazilian Fernando de Noronha ArthipeLago, Southern AtLantic Ocean, 8Q/. IG-VSi'. Sér.Cient.. 24:77-94 ABSTRACT A classification schcmc for lhe volcanie-subvolcanie rock.s of the Fernando de Noronha Arthipelago ispresenlCd,followingthe ruGS recommendations, basedon lhe petrographiestudyofa large number of 5aDlples. In Fernando de Noronha 1\0>0 main volcanie events were defined by Almeida (19jj): an clcier Remédios Formation (12 to 8 Ma old) composed of domes, plugs and dilr::es of tephrilie-basanitic to trachytie anil phonolitie compositions, \\ith essexite porphyries, limburgites and alkaline lamprophyres intrud­ ing basal pyroclastic rods, anil a younger Quixaba FormaLion (3 to 2 Ma), made up mostIy by flows of nephelinitie composítion (ankarauiles). The lamprophyres wen: separalCd in two groups: tephritie or me1anocratic lamprophyres anil typicallamprophyres, the fim oncs belonging to a suile eharacterizcd by coo­ tinoow iDCrease in amphibole content. MOS! of lhe roeu of lhe Remédios Formation appear lO belong lO lWO distinctpetrographiescries,oncreprescnlcdbyanundersaturalcdsodicba!;anite-tcphrile(csscxile)-poonolile trend and the olher by a poussic alkali basall-trachyandesite-trachyte scries, while the limburgites and \ampro­ phyresareofuncenainancestry Some ankaratrite and olivine nephelinitc dikes lhat only cul the Remédios roeu are also anributcd 10 the Quixaba Formation. The basanitie flow with mantle xenoLiths ar the São José lsland. COIISidered b)' Almei~ (19.5S) to form lhe )'ouogcst São José FormaLion, is Ilere tentatively interpreted as represcnting lhe waning stages of lhe Quixaba volcanism.
    [Show full text]