Air & Transportation Law Reporter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Monday, December 9, 2013
Corporate Communications 817-967-1577 [email protected] FOR RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013 AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP ANNOUNCES EQUITY DISTRIBUTION UPDATE FORT WORTH, Texas – Today’s consummation of the merger between AMR Corporation and US Airways Group, Inc. and the effectiveness of AMR’s Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) will result in the distribution of American Airlines Group Inc. common stock (NASDAQ: AAL) and convertible preferred stock (NASDAQ: AALCP) to equity holders, creditors and employees of AMR Corporation. American Airlines Group Inc. has determined that holders of AMR common stock (formerly traded under the symbol: “AAMRQ”) will receive, for each share of AMR common stock, an initial distribution of approximately 0.0665 shares of AAL in connection with the occurrence of the effective date of the Plan. AAMRQ holders may in the future receive additional distributions based on the trading price of AAL common stock during the 120 day period after the effective date and the total amount of allowed claims, in each case, in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Additional Information and Where to Find It For questions about distributions under the Plan, please visit www.amrcaseinfo.com. For information about American Airlines Group Inc., including financial information, corporate governance and its SEC filings, please visit www.aa.com/investorrelations. About American Airlines Group American Airlines Group (NASDAQ: AAL) is the holding company for American Airlines and US Airways. Together with American Eagle and US Airways Express, the airlines operate an average of nearly 6,700 flights per day to 339 destinations in 54 countries from hubs in Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix and Washington, D.C. -
Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation
Darienite News for Darien https://darienite.com Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation Author : David Gurliacci Categories : Opinion, Transportation Tagged as : Cameron on Air Travel 2019, Cameron on Transportation, Cameron on Transportation 2019, Cameron on Transportation History 2019, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column 2019 Date : July 12, 2019 Rail fans call them “fallen flags.” They are railroads that no longer exist, like the original New Haven and New York Central railroads. But before I start getting all misty eyed, let’s also pay homage to airlines that have flown away into history. 1 / 3 Darienite There’s PEOPLExpress, the domestic discount airline that flew out of Newark’s grungy old North Terminal startingNews infor 1981. Darien Fares were dirt cheap, collected on-board during the flight and checked bags cost $3. You https://darienite.comeven had to pay for sodas and snacks. The airline expanded too fast, even adding a 747 to its fleet for $99 flights to Brussels, and was eventually merged with Continental under its rapacious Chairman Frank Lorenzo, later banished from the industry by the Department of Transportation. There were any number of smaller, regional airlines that merged or just folded their wings, including Mohawk, Northeast, Southeast, Midway, L’Express, Independence Air, Air California, PSA and a personal favorite, Midwest Express, started by the Kimberly Clark paper company to shuttle employees between its mills and headquarters in Milwaukee. Midwest flew DC-9s, usually fitted with coach seats in a 2-and-3 configuration, but equipped instead with business-class 2-and-2 leather seats. -
A Work Project, Presented As Part of Requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA - School of Business and Economics
A Work Project, presented as part of requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA - School of Business and Economics US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again Milton José Andrade Figueira, n.º 2298 A Project carried out on the Master in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Paulo Soares de Pinho January 2018 Abstract Title: US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again This case follows US Airways’ performance from inception to the potential merger with bankrupted American Airlines in 2012. Throughout the case, several events that endangered the existence of US Airways are brought into light. These events serve as basis to introduce the value of leverage and financial distress costs. Moreover, the case reflects on the decision between out-of-court restructuring and chapter 11, while assessing distressed mergers and acquisitions. Finally, the potential merger is analyzed and the proposed solution is that new equity should be split 69-31 per cent between American Airlines’ unsecured creditors and shareholders, and US Airways’ shareholders. Keywords: Costs of Financial Distress, Bankruptcy, Mergers and Acquisitions, Deal Financing 2 Nova School of Business and Economics Paulo Soares de Pinho Milton Andrade Figueira US Airways: The Ugly Girl Gets Married Again “As one of you simply put it, “Why are we the ugly girl?” The answer, of course, is we are not and there’s no better evidence of that than our recent performance.” Douglas Parker - Chief Executive Officer, US Airways On January 2012, William Douglas Parker, usually treated as Doug Parker, US Airways Inc. -
US and Plaintiff States V. US Airways Group, Inc. and AMR Corporation
Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:13-cv-01236 (CKK) US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and AMR CORPORATION Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiffs United States of America ("United States") and the States of Arizona, Florida, Tennessee and Michigan, the Commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia ("Plaintiff States") filed their Complaint against Defendants US Airways Group, Inc. ("US Airways") and AMR Corporation ("American") on August 13, 2013, as amended on September 5, 2013; AND WHEREAS, the United States and the Plaintiff States and Defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or law; AND WHEREAS, Defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of the Final Judgment pending its approval by the Court; 1 Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 2 of 28 AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture of certain rights or assets by the Defendants to assure that competition is not substantially lessened; AND WHEREAS, the Final Judgment requires Defendants to make certain divestitures for the purposes of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint; AND WHEREAS, Defendants have represented to the United States and the Plaintiff States that the divestitures required below can and will be made, and that the Defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the provisions below; NOW THEREFORE, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: I. -
Departemen Ilmu Politik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Univeristas Sumatera Utara Medan 2019
skripsi ANALISIS KEMENANGAN DONALD TRUMP DALAM PEMILIH PRESIDEN AMERIKA SERIKAT TAHUN 2016 (Figur Politik Donald Trump) Disusun Oleh: REIZA JANUARDHY SIREGAR 140906006 Dosen Pembimbing : Drs. Heri Kusmanto, MA,. Ph.D DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERISTAS SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2019 Universitas Sumatera Utara UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK REIZA JANUARDHY SIREGAR (140906006) ANALISIS KEMENANGAN DONALD TRUMP DALAM PEMILIH PRESIDEN AMERIKA SERIKAT TAHUN 2016 (Figur Politik Donald Trump) Rincian isi skripsi: 68 Halaman, 10 buku, 3 jurnal, 22 sumber internet ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat menganalisis kemenangan Donald Trump pada Pemilihan Presiden Amerika Serikat pada tahun 2016 melawan Hillary Clinton. Figur politik Donald Trump yang kontroversial menimbulkan aksi protes karena pernyataan-pernyataannya yang kontroversial setelah kemenangannya menjadi Presiden Amerika Serikat. Rumusan masalah pada penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat bagaimana figur politik Donald Trump sehingga ia dapat menang dalam pemilihan Presiden Amerika Serikat tahun 2016. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif dengan jenis penelitian kualitatif dan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka. Teori yang digunakan untuk penelitian ini adalah teori marketing politik dan publik figur. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Donald Trump memenangi pemilihan pendahuluan beberapa negagara bagian yang menguatkan posisinya menjadi satu-satunya calon -
300000000 Airport System Revenue Bonds Series 2006A
NEW ISSUE/BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the respective opinions of Co-Bond Counsel to the Authority to be delivered upon the issuance of the Series 2006A Bonds, under existing law and assuming compliance by the Authority with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), that must be met subsequent to the issuance of the Series 2006A Bonds, with which the Authority has certified, represented and covenanted its compliance, interest on the Series 2006A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes except for any period during which such Series 2006A Bonds are held by a person who is a “substantial user” of the facilities financed or a “related” person, as those terms are used in Section 147(a) of the Code, but is an item of tax preference in calculating the federal alternative minimum tax liability of individuals, trusts, estates and corporations, Also, in the respective opinions of Co-Bond Counsel to be delivered upon the issuance of the Series 2006A Bonds, under existing law, interest on the Series 2006A Bonds is exempt from income taxation by the Commonwealth of Virginia and is exempt from all taxation of the District of Columbia except estate, inheritance and gift taxes. See “TAX MATTERS” for a more detailed discussion. $300,000,000 Airport System Revenue Bonds Series 2006A (AMT) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1 in the years as shown herein Interest on the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority’s (the “Authority”) $300,000,000 Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A (the “Series 2006A Bonds”), will be payable on April 1, 2006, and semiannually thereafter on each April 1 and October 1. -
692-5000 in the Matter of the Application of the 31 NMB No. 110
NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD WASHINGTON, DC 20572 (202) 692-5000 In the Matter of the Application of the 31 NMB No. 110 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD FILE NO. CR-6842 OF TEAMSTERS FINDINGS UPON alleging a representation dispute INVESTIGATION pursuant to Section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act, as September 16, 2004 amended involving employees of ALLEGHENY AIRLINES, INC. AND PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. This determination addresses the applications filed by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO (IBT) and the Communications Workers of America (CWA). IBT requests the National Mediation Board (Board or NMB) to investigate whether Allegheny Airlines, Inc. (Allegheny) and Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (Piedmont or collectively with Allegheny as Carriers) operate as a single transportation system. The investigation establishes that Allegheny and Piedmont operate as a single transportation system for purposes of the craft or class of Fleet and Passenger Service Employees. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 13, 2004, IBT filed an application alleging a representation dispute involving the consolidated Fleet and Passenger Service Employees craft or class formed by the -528- 31 NMB No. 110 merger of Allegheny into Piedmont. IBT asserted that Allegheny and Piedmont constitute a single transportation system. The application was assigned NMB File No. CR-6842. The Board assigned Maria-Kate Dowling to investigate. On March 2, 2004, the Board requested that the Carriers provide information on whether Allegheny and Piedmont were operating as a single transportation system. The Carriers jointly responded on March 23, 2004. On March 26, 2004, CWA filed an application alleging a representation dispute involving the combined Allegheny/Piedmont Fleet and Passenger Service Employees craft or class. -
Town of Provincetown Visitor Services Board Meeting Minutes from February 21, 2017, 3:00 Pm Town Hall, Judge Welsh Room 260 Commercial Street Provincetown, MA 02657
Town of Provincetown Visitor Services Board Meeting Minutes from February 21, 2017, 3:00 pm Town Hall, Judge Welsh Room 260 Commercial Street Provincetown, MA 02657 Members present: Marian Peck ‐ Chair, Hersh Schwartz – Vice Chair, Lesley Marchessault, Rick Murray – conference call, Rob Costa, Bob Sanborn – conference call Members absent: Meeting was called to order at 3:10 pm by Marian Peck. Staff: Anthony Fuccillo, Radu Luca. Others: Jay Gurewitsch, David Cox, Allan McKinnon, Candice Collins‐ Boden, Dan Vanwaus, Helen Addison, Marc Kundmann, Rex McKinsey, Ray Sturdy, Robin Lapidus, Phillip Desmerais Agenda: 1. Public Statements—Five minutes maximum. Board members are not obligated to respond to Public Statements Jay Gurewicz – enormous opportunity and threat in Provincetown with the Trump administration. The US dollar is very strong, which will result in international cancellations to the US. Expectation of fewer travelers because fewer travelers to the US in general. Canada is a huge market for the US and thinks there will be massive cancellations in 2017. Believes the marketing and PR that has been done out of the tourism office is dated and thinks it needs more Facebook & Google advertising as well as drone videos such as David Cox’. 1 2. Director of Tourism Memo to VSB (Feb 8, 2017). Requested by Marian Peck February 8, 2017 To: Visitor Services Board From: Tony Fuccillo Copy: David Panagore, David Gardner, Radu Luca RE: Tourism Office Activities Update As we did not have a quorum for yesterday’s VSB meeting, and as we will not meet until 21 February, I would like to bring you up to date on the Tourism Office activities and the Communications Agency RFP. -
OHS FOIA Privacy Office Logs - FY2016 Received January 1, 2016 - January 1, 2016
OHS FOIA Privacy Office Logs - FY2016 Received January 1, 2016 - January 1, 2016 Received Request ID Requester Name Request Description Date 2016-HQF0-00088 (b)(6) to find out if I'm on any list watch list blacklist investigation or program for any 1/25/2016 government activity for surveillance or monitoring via drones nationally by local state federal , FBI, CIA, NSA/Quantico military or government contractors 2016-HQF0-00109 Musgrave, Shawn copies of responses to Congressional Committees from the Department of 1/11/2016 Homeland Security (DHS), January 1, 2013 through October 31, 2015 2016-HQF0-00126 Golden, Larry records for the following documents by their solicitation number: 1. HSHQDC-13- 1/29/2016 R-00052 2. HSHQDC-12-R-00001 3. HSHQ DC-13-R-00026 4. DHSSBIRFY081 5. HCl-l(')l'lr _ 14-R-111111(1<; 2016-HQF0-00131 Francescani, Chris records pertaining to the following: 1. All correspondence received by the Office 1 /6/2016 of the General Counsel or any other office, section or department within the United States Department of Homeland Security which includes any discussions, questions or suggestions about the prospect of federal employees conducting online research on U.S. visa applicants' publicly-accessible social media postings, between December 1, 2015 and December 16, 2015 - from any offices or sections within the U.S. Department of State, including but not limited to the agency's Office of the Legal Adviser or Bureau of Legislative Affairs 2016-HQF0-00157 Smith, Ian Any and all records of emails ecommunications from private -
US Airways, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) (Commission File No
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to US Airways Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (Commission File No. 1-8444) Delaware 54-1194634 (State or other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 111 West Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona 85281 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (480) 693-0800 (Registrants telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None US Airways, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (Commission File No. 1-8442) Delaware 54-0218143 (State or other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 111 West Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona 85281 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (480) 693-0800 (Registrants telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the proxy statement related to US Airways Group, Inc.’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which proxy statement will be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 120 days of the end of US Airways Group, Inc.’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. -
Corporate Profile
Corporate Profile The SABRE Group Holdings, Inc. (The SABRE Group) is a world leader in the electronic distribution of travel-related products and services and is a leading provider of information technology solutions for the travel and transportation indus- try. Through The SABRE Group’s global distribution system, more than 30,000 travel agency locations, three million reg- istered individual consumers and numerous corporations access information on and book reservations with more than 400 airlines, more than 50 car rental companies, 35,000 hotel properties, and dozens of railways, tour companies, passenger ferries and cruise lines located throughout the world. The SABRE Group also provides a comprehensive suite of decision- support systems, software and consulting services to the travel and transportation industry, and is increasingly leveraging its expertise to offer solutions to companies in other industries that face similar complex operational issues. Airport author- ities, railroads, logistical service providers, lodging companies, oil and gas companies, and leaders in the financial services industry are all customers of The SABRE Group. The SABRE Group operates one of the world’s largest privately owned, real-time computer systems. The vast SABRE® network links over 130,000 terminals located in travel agencies, as well as many more privately owned personal computers, and has sent up to 190 million messages per day to the central data cen- ter located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The data center is composed of 17 mainframe computers with over 4,000 MIPS of pro- cessing power and 15.3 terabytes of electronic storage. The SABRE Group’s objective is to be the leading provider of information technology solutions to the travel industry, and to broaden its customer base by expanding to other industries. -
DRAFT AMR-US Merger Release
FOR RELEASE: Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2013 AMR CORPORATION AND US AIRWAYS ANNOUNCE SETTLEMENT WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL Settlement Allows for Completion of Merger in December FORT WORTH, Texas and TEMPE, Ariz, – AMR Corporation (OTCQB: AAMRQ), the parent company of American Airlines, Inc., and US Airways Group, Inc. (NYSE: LCC) today announced that the airlines have settled the litigation brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the States of Arizona, Florida, Michigan and Tennessee, the Commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia challenging the merger of AMR and US Airways. The companies also announced an agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) related to small community service from Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). Tom Horton, chairman, president and CEO of AMR, and incoming chairman of the board of the combined company, said, “This is an important day for our customers, our people and our financial stakeholders. This agreement allows us to take the final steps in creating the new American Airlines. With a renewed spirit, we are about to create the world’s leading airline that will offer, along with our oneworld® partners, a comprehensive global network and service by the best people in the business. There is much more work ahead of us but we’re energized by the challenge and look forward to competing vigorously in the ever-changing global marketplace.” Doug Parker, chairman and CEO of US Airways, and incoming CEO of the combined airline, said, “This is very good news and we are grateful to all who have made it happen.