DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma Special Education Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma Special Education Handbook Special Education Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS How-to Guide on Using This Manual ........................................................................................................... 11 Navigation ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Legal Citations ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Accessing Federal and State Regulations .......................................................................................... 11 Acronyms & Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 12 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 1: Free Appropriate Public Education ....................................................................................... 38 Introduction. Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) ............................................................. 38 Section 1. Provision of a FAPE ................................................................................................................. 38 A. LEA Obligation ............................................................................................................................... 38 B. LEA Provision of a FAPE ................................................................................................................ 39 C. Limit to LEA Obligation ................................................................................................................. 40 D. When LEA Obligation to Provide a FAPE Ends ........................................................................ 40 Section 2. FAPE Considerations ................................................................................................................ 40 A. Incarcerated Students ................................................................................................................... 40 B. Funding Sources and Insurance .................................................................................................... 41 C. Accessible Educational Materials (AEM) .................................................................................... 42 D. Assistive Technology ...................................................................................................................... 42 E. Physical Education .......................................................................................................................... 43 F. Residential Placement ................................................................................................................... 43 G. Extended School Year ................................................................................................................... 43 H. Charter Schools and Virtual Charter Schools ............................................................................ 43 I. Medication....................................................................................................................................... 44 Section 3. Case Law Interpretations of a FAPE .................................................................................... 44 Chapter 2. Child Find .................................................................................................................................... 47 Section 1. LEA Responsibility .................................................................................................................... 47 Section 2. Locating Students ..................................................................................................................... 48 A. Public Awareness ........................................................................................................................... 48 Table of Contents OSDE-SES| August 2017 Page | 2 Section 3. Identifying Students ................................................................................................................. 48 A. Screening ......................................................................................................................................... 48 B. Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) ......................................................................... 49 Section 4. Special Education Referral for Evaluation .......................................................................... 50 Chapter 3. Young Children, Ages 3-5 ........................................................................................................ 52 Section 1. Locating Students ..................................................................................................................... 52 A. Coordination ................................................................................................................................... 52 B. Public Awareness ........................................................................................................................... 52 Section 2. Identifying Students ................................................................................................................. 53 Section 3. Referrals from SoonerStart .................................................................................................... 53 Section 4. Late Referrals to SoonerStart ............................................................................................... 54 Section 5. Late Referrals to LEA .............................................................................................................. 54 Section 6. Transition Planning Conference (TPC) .................................................................................. 54 A. Purposes ........................................................................................................................................... 54 B. Topics at the TPC............................................................................................................................ 55 C. Members of the TPC ...................................................................................................................... 55 Section 7. Initial Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 56 Section 8. Developmental Delay ............................................................................................................. 56 A. Evaluation Components for Developmental Delay .................................................................. 57 B. Eligibility Determination as Defined in 70 O.S. §13-123 for Developmental Delay ....... 57 Section 9. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) and Continuum of Alternative Placements. ............ 59 Section 10. Special Education and Related Services ........................................................................... 62 A. Transportation as a Related Service .......................................................................................... 62 Section 11. IEP Service Agreements ........................................................................................................ 63 Section 12. Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) ...................................................................................... 63 A. ECO Ratings .................................................................................................................................... 63 B. Child Outcomes Summary Form (COS) ...................................................................................... 64 Section 13. Average Daily Attendance ................................................................................................. 64 Chapter 4. Initial Evaluation & Eligibility ................................................................................................... 67 Section 1. Request for Initial Evaluation ................................................................................................ 67 Section 2. Parent Rights ........................................................................................................................... 67 Section 3. Review of Existing Data (RED) ............................................................................................. 68 Table of Contents OSDE-SES| August 2017 Page | 3 A. No Additional Data Needed ...................................................................................................... 68 B. Additional Data Needed ............................................................................................................. 68 Section 4. Written Notice/Parental Consent ........................................................................................ 68 A. Written Notice ................................................................................................................................ 68 B. Request for Parental Consent ...................................................................................................... 69 C. Failure to Respond or Provide Consent...................................................................................... 69 D. Parental Consent Not Needed ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Education
    Undergraduate Special Education Degrees Available at SIUE School of Education, Health and • Bachelor of Science, Special Education Human Behavior Special Education at SIUE Department of Teaching and Learning The special education program at SIUE is a nationally recognized program delivered through a collaborative partnership agreement between SIUE and public school districts. Classroom teachers and university professors work together to provide special education candidates a unique opportunity to regularly interact with children with disabilities from pre-K to age 21. In the School of Education, Health and Human Behavior, we combine classroom instruction and ample opportunities for practical experiences in a variety of settings. In conjunction with the early childhood program, the special education program also provides courses required for early childhood special education approval. The special education program offers Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation-approved programs at the undergraduate level for teaching licensure as a learning behavior specialist (LBS I). Diversity Statement SIUE’s teacher education programs foster teacher candidates’ ability to understand and meet professional responsibilities by modeling respect and value for diversity. Candidates create and engage their students in practices that develop awareness, understanding, respect and a valuing of the forms of diversity that exist in society and their importance Faculty in learning and teaching. The School of Education, Health and Human Behavior teacher Faculty in the special education program education programs are dedicated to supporting all teacher education candidates, in the School of Education, Health and regardless of their economic or social status, and advocates for the rights of students free Human Behavior represent a diverse group from discrimination based on race, color, ethnic origin, national origin, creed, religion, of professional educators and exemplary political belief, sex, sexual orientation, gender identification, ability or age.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Perspective on the Legacy of the London 2012 Paralympic Games
    A Critical Perspective on the Legacy of the London 2012 Paralympic Games A Critical Perspective on the Legacy of the London 2012 Paralympic Games Ian BRITTAIN, Ph.D. （Coventry University） Introduction Despite the fact that there has been a large body of work produced over the last decade or so that has examined major sport event legacies and event leverage, largely with respect to the Olympic Games, Misener et al. claim that ‘few studies have evaluated the comparative outcomes, legacies and event leverage that the Paralympic Games have generated1）’. This is despite the fact that, in many ways, the Paralympic Games, and their forerunners the Stoke Mandeville Games, were actually founded upon the basis of a kind of ‘legacy plan’ designed to improve the lives of people with disabilities. Before the Second World War, there is little evidence of organised efforts to develop or promote sport for individuals with disabling conditions, especially those with spinal injuries who were considered to have no hope of surviving their injuries. Following the war, however, medical authorities were prompted to re-evaluate traditional methods of rehabilitation which were not satisfactorily responding to the medical and psychological needs of the large number of soldiers disabled in combat2）. According to McCann, Dr Ludwig Guttmann （the universally accepted founder of the Paralympic movement） recognised the physiological and psychological values of sport in the rehabilitation of paraplegic hospital inpatients3） and so it was at that point that sport was introduced as part of their rehabilitation. The aim was not only to give hope and a sense of self-worth to the patients, but to change the attitudes of society towards the spinally injured by demonstrating to them that they could not only continue to be useful members of society, but could take part in activities and complete tasks that most of the non- disabled society would struggle with4）.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Education and Critical Pedagogy at the Intersections of Disability, Race, Gender and Class
    Inclusive education and critical pedagogy at the intersections of disability, race, gender and class Anastasia Liasidou European University, Cyprus Abstract The paper aims to use insights from critical pedagogy to forge and exemplify links with the movement of educational inclusion. The struggles for change, theorised in terms of the emancipatory and liberating potential of schooling, set out the conceptual and analytical backdrop against which issues of exclusion and marginalisation are discussed and reflected upon. The emancipatory and transformative roles of schools, as sites of power interplays at the interstices of disability, race, socioeconomic background and gender, are placed at the core of the analytical framework, with a view to highlighting the contextual and political ways against which notions of “need” and “disadvantage” are constructed, reified and perpetuated in dominant conceptualisations of schooling and pedagogy. It is suggested that the emancipatory potential of schooling entails transcending traditional constructions and arbitrations of the “ideal student”, embodied in Western-centric and neoliberal constructions of pedagogical discourse. The notion of intersectionality, as perceived and exemplified in relation to insights from critical pedagogy and critical disability studies, is presented as an emancipatory theoretical and analytical tool in interrogating and deconstructing educational discourses of individual and social pathology that evoke and legitimize the constitution of the “non-ideal student” in current schooling. Key words: Inclusion, Critical Pedagogy, disability, justice, equality, power. Introduction Currently, educational inclusion constitutes an international policy imperative that promotes the rights of disabled children to be educated alongside their peers in mainstream classrooms (Armstrong and Barton 2007;Kenworthy and Whittaker 2000; Rioux 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Education Processes + Procedural Safeguards
    Louisiana’s Educational Rights of Children with Disabilities Special Education Processes + Procedural Safeguards January 2020 For further information, contact: The mission of the Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) is to ensure equal access to education and to promote equal excellence throughout the state. The LDOE is committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunities and is committed to ensuring that all of its programs and facilities are accessible to all members of the public. The LDOE does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex, or genetic information. Inquiries concerning the LDOE’s compliance with Title IX and other civil rights laws may be directed to the Attorney, LDOE, Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 94064, Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9064; 877.453.2721 or [email protected]. Infor- mation about the federal civil rights laws that apply to the LDOE and other educational institutions is available on the website for the Office of Civil Rights, USDOE, at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/. Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose ...............................................................................................................1 Special Education and Related Services ............................................................................................1 Referral for Evaluation ..................................................................................................................2 Evaluation ....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • The Evaluation Roadmap for Optimizing Pre-K Programs 2018
    2018 The Evaluation Roadmap for Optimizing Pre-K Programs The Evaluation Roadmap for Optimizing Pre-K Programs: Overview Anna D. Johnson, Deborah A. Phillips and Owen Schochet goal was the focus of a series of meetings and Introduction discussions among a high-level group of practi- In recent years, it has become increasingly clear tioners and researchers with responsibility for that one of the best ways to build a productive and experience with designing, implementing and prosperous society is to start early—that is, and evaluating pre-k programs across the before children enter kindergarten—in building country. This report reflects the best thinking children’s foundation for learning, health, and of this practitioner-research engagement effort. positive behavior. From the U.S. Chambers of As you prepare to evaluate a pre-K program, we Commerce to the National Academy of Sci- invite you to draw upon this practice- and re- ences, those planning our country’s workforce search-informed expertise to design early educa- insist we will need more people, with more di- tion settings that better support early learning verse skills, to meet the challenges of the future. and development. Your careful attention to In response, educators have focused on sup- evaluation will help early education systems porting learning earlier, recognizing that early from across the country identify the factors that learning establishes the foundation upon which distinguish effective programs from less effec- all future skill development is constructed. Iden- tive ones and take constructive action to better tifying and replicating the most important fea- meet our country’s educational and workforce tures of successful pre-K programs in order to goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Part-Time Teacher Professional Development and Best Practices on Adult Learners' Outcomes Sandra Kay Brown Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 Exploring Part-Time Teacher Professional Development and Best Practices on Adult Learners' Outcomes Sandra Kay Brown Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Adult and Continuing Education Administration Commons, Adult and Continuing Education and Teaching Commons, and the Higher Education Administration Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University COLLEGE OF EDUCATION This is to certify that the doctoral study by Sandra Brown has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Kathleen Claggett, Committee Chairperson, Education Faculty Dr. Ramo Lord, Committee Member, Education Faculty Dr. Cathryn White, University Reviewer, Education Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract Exploring Part-Time Teacher Professional Development and Best Practices on Adult Learners’ Outcomes by Sandra K. Brown EdS, Walden University, 2015 CAS, SUNY College at Brockport, 1999 MS, SUNY College at Brockport, 1992 BS, Andrews University, 1979 Doctoral Project Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Higher Education and Adult Learning Walden University April 2017 Abstract This study addressed the role of limited part-time teacher professional development on adult learners’ success at an adult education center in the northeast United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities English Version, August 2012
    The UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities English Version, August 2012 Foreword by Professor Emeritus Ron McCallum AO Chair United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities The purpose of this booklet is to explain, especially to athletes competing at the London 2012 Paralympic Games and their coaches, families, supporters and friends, the reach and scope of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Paralympic athletes, through their living experiences of being persons with disabilities, have overcome huge hurdles to participate in these 2012 Paralympic Games. You are torch bearers for us all, and it is my hope that you will be torch bearers for this Convention. The Convention upholds and safeguards the inherent dignity of all persons with disabilities. It protects the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all persons with disabilities and is binding upon those countries which have ratified it. It is one of the ten United Nations Human Rights Conventions. Each of these conventions has an elected committee, which is known as a treaty body, whose primary function is to monitor the implementation of its convention. As the Chair of this Convention's treaty body, I am aware what a difference the Convention is already making in the lives of we persons with disabilities. The fulfilment of human rights and fundamental freedoms is essential for the attainment of full human dignity by all persons with disabilities, and I urge you to take the time to examine their breadth and scope by reading through this booklet and the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Education Certification
    OCTOBER 2010 LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Table of Contents Overview of Special Education Certification ........................ 2 Routes to Attaining Special Education Certification ............. 3 Special Education Add-On Endorsements ............................. 7 Professional Development ................................................. 11 Targeting Special Education Certification .......................... 12 National Board Teacher Certification (NBTC) ...................... 13 Contact Information .......................................................... 14 SPECIAL EDUCATION CERTIFICATION 1 Routes to Attaining Overview of Special Education Certification Special Education Certification The purpose of this booklet is to inform Traditional Undergraduate Programs certified teachers and prospective teachers of the opportunities in Louisiana to add special A traditional teacher preparation program is offered exclusively through an education areas to existing certificates and the institution of higher education. Teacher candidates earn a Bachelor of Arts or process to gain initial certification as a special Bachelor of Science degree that includes general education courses, one or more education teacher. Information is also provided subject focus areas, professional education courses, supervised field experiences, for capacity-building professional development and student teaching in a school setting under the supervision of a classroom and National Board Certification. teacher and supervisor from the university. In order to create
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
    education sciences Article Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality James M. Kauffman 1,* and Garry Hornby 2,* 1 Department of Special Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA 2 Institute of Education, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.M.K.); [email protected] (G.H.) Received: 14 August 2020; Accepted: 17 September 2020; Published: 22 September 2020 Abstract: The reasons are examined for the disparity between the inclusive vision espoused by Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the reality of the limited extent of inclusion in education systems worldwide. First, the leadership of key senior academics in the field of special education is considered to have been misguided in promoting a vision of full inclusion despite the lack of research evidence for the benefits of inclusive education over traditional special education provision. Second, attitudes toward and the treatment of people with disabilities have a long and complex history, and in this, many proponents of inclusion have been critical of 20th century special education. In particular, they claim that the sorting, labelling and categorizing required by special education have negative implications. Third, educators have been encouraged to imagine a system of education that is limitless, in the sense that all children with disabilities can be included in general education. This is because it is envisaged that general education classrooms will become so flexible that there will be no limits to the accommodation of students with disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of their special educational needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Pedagogy and Knowledge in Special Education
    TIED1044203 Techset Composition India (P) Ltd., Bangalore and Chennai, India 5/6/2015 International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1044203 5 Inclusive pedagogy and knowledge in special education: addressing the tension ∗ Joseph Mintz and Dominic Wyse 10 Department of Early Years and Primary Education, Institute of Education, University College London, 120 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK AQ2 ¶ (Received 8 July 2014; accepted 3 March 2015) 15 There has been an increasing focus in policy and practice on adopting inclusive pedagogy as a way of reconceptualising how schools work with children with special educational needs (SEN). The paper considers the split between knowledge and pedagogy inherent in some dominant strains of inclusive pedagogy. Drawing on the ‘knowledge turn’ in curriculum studies, we argue that although an analytical distinction between knowledge and pedagogy may be 20 useful, too strong a delineation between the two fails to best serve the needs of children with special needs. Specific implications for teacher education in relation to SEN in England are considered. Keywords: inclusion; special educational needs; pedagogy; inclusive pedagogy 25 Inclusive pedagogy and knowledge: addressing the tension AQ3 ¶ In the modern classroom, children’s needs are diverse, complex and recognised as such; yet, progressive and neo-liberal conceptions of the purpose of activity in the classroom often have an uneasy coexistence both in the structures of the school and in the mind of 30 the teacher. The tension between instrumentalist approaches to the role of the teacher, and alternative, broader conceptualizations of the purposes of education are often most CE: KRK QA: Coll: clearly seen when classrooms contain children perceived as differing from the norm.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Evauation of Early Childhood Education Programmes
    OCCASIONAL PAPER No. 1 1996 Quality Evauation Of Early Childhood Education Programmes Pamela Cubey and Carmen Dalli Series Editor: Carmen DaIli Institute for Early Childhood Studies Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand O1996 Copyright is held by individual writers over their own work Publishing rights are held by the Institute for Early Childhood Studies ISSN: 1174-1546 Occasional Paper Series No.1 [Series Editor: Carmen Dalli] ISBN: 0-475-20050-0 Quality Evaulation of Early Childhood Education Programmes CONTENTS Introduction 3 The terms "evaluation" and "assessment" 4 Why assess? Why evaluate? 6 Evaluation and the early childhood curriculum 9 The evaluation process, reflective practice and quality early childhood education 12 Assessment and evaluation practices 14 Testing and conventional approaches 14 Alternative approaches 17 Methods and instruments of evaluation 18 Constraints on evaluation of early childhood programmes 20 Concluding summary 21 References 23 Funded with assistance from the 6th Early Childhood Convention Committee Introduction In 1989 the New Zealand Council for Educational Research organised a seminar on Assessment in Early Childhood Education. This was one of the first times that the topic of assessment and evaluation received formalairing by the early childhood community. Until then,the generally accepted wisdom had been that assessment in early childhood education was inappropriate because of the very young age of the children who use this service and the great variability in developmental progress at this age. The 1990s saw a decided increase in interest in assessment and evaluation. Curricular change, and with it, assessment and evaluation, became part of the national policy agenda for all parts of the educational sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Parent Guide to Special Education for School-Age Children
    Pennsylvania Parent Guide to Special Education for School-Age Children INTRODUCTION Parents are very important participants in the special education process. Parents know their child better than anyone else and have valuable information to contribute about the kinds of programs and services that are needed for their child’s success in school. To ensure the rights of children with a disability, additional laws have been enacted. In this guide we use the terms “rules” and “regulations.” This booklet has been written to explain these rules so parents will feel comfortable and can better participate in the educational decision-making process for their child. The chapters that follow address questions that parents may have about special education, relating to their child who is thought to have, or may have, a disability. Chapter One focuses on how a child’s need for special education is determined. In this chapter, the evaluation and decision-making processes are discussed, as well as the members of the team who conduct the tests and make the decisions regarding a child’s eligibility for special education programs and services. Chapter Two explains how a special education program (that is, an Individualized Education Program) is devel- oped and the kinds of information it must include. This chapter describes how appropriate services are deter- mined, as well as the notice that a school district must give to parents summarizing a child’s special education program. Planning for the transition from school to adult living is also discussed. Chapter Three deals with the responsibilities that a school district has to a child who is eligible for special education services and the child’s parents.
    [Show full text]