DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Competitiveness of the Canadian Stock Market

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Competitiveness of the Canadian Stock Market On the Competitiveness of the Canadian Stock Market Ce´cile Carpentier, Jean-Franc¸ois L’Her & Jean-Marc Suret* Even if the competitiveness of the Canadian securities market is a central argument in the ongoing debate related to the proposal of a single securities commission, the exact level of competitiveness and the evolution of this market are largely undocumented. The numerous changes that modified the structure of the securities market during the last twenty years probably explain this lack of evidence. Two dimensions of the market’s competitiveness deserve attention. The first one is the proposition that the Canadian market is unable to compete with other markets in attracting and keeping new listings and transactions. The second one is the proposition that a discount penalizes firms that finance in Canada relative to the U.S. We address the first proposition by carefully analysing the evolution of the Canadian market from 1990 to 2007 in terms of market capitalization, number of listed companies and trading volume. We then compare the increase observed in Canada with similar data from other countries. We analyze the discount argument in light of recent studies that explain this phenomenon, and document this discount on other markets. The objective of this article is to provide documented evidence that could ground the debate on the optimal regulatory structure for the Canadian market. Meˆme si la compe´titivite´ du marche´ canadien des valeurs mobilie`res est un argument central du de´bat qui entoure la cre´ation d’une commission unique des valeurs mobilie`res, le niveau exact et l’e´volution de ce marche´ sont mal connus. Les nombreux changements qui ont touche´ la structure de ce marche´ au cours des vingt dernie`res anne´es expliquent probablement cette lacune. Nous pensons que deux dimensions de cette compe´titivite´ me´ritent d’eˆtre analyse´es. La premie`re est cet argument qui veut que le marche´ canadien soit mal arme´ pour faire face a` la concurrence des autres marche´s. Il ne serait en mesure ni d’attirer de nouvelles inscriptions ni de conserver les transactions. Le second argu- ment indique que les e´metteurs canadiens souffriraient d’un escompte lors de la vente de leurs actions. Nous traitons le premier argument en analysant soigneusement l’e´volution des principaux indicateurs de de´veloppement du marche´ entre 1990 et 2007. * Cecile Carpentier and Jean-Marc Suret are Professors at Laval University Que´bec, and Fellows of CIRANO (Montreal). Jean-Franc¸ois L’Her is from La Caisse de de´poˆt et placement du Que´bec. Contact Author: Jean-Marc Suret, email: jean- [email protected]. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Caisse de de´poˆt et placement du Que´bec. The authors thank Jacques Saint-Pierre for his very helpful comments. Any remaining errors are own. 288 BANKING & FINANCE LAW REVIEW [24 B.F.L.R.] Il s’agit de la capitalisation, du nombre de socie´te´s inscrites et des volumes de trans- action. Nous comparons ensuite l’e´volution canadienne a` celle des autres pays. Nous analysons l’argument de l’escompte en utilisant les travaux re´cents qui expliquent l’origine de cet escompte et qui montrent qu’il existe e´galement dans la plupart des pays. L’objectif de l’article est d’alimenter le de´bat relatif a` la structure de la re´gle- mentation des valeurs mobilie`res au Canada a` l’aide de donne´es rigoureuses. INTRODUCTION Recently, a great deal of attention has been devoted to the health of the Canadian securities market, in conjunction with the proposal of a single securities commission. According to the Wise Person Committee Report, the weaknesses of the Canadian Securities regulation system make Canada less competitive than it should be at a time of increasing global competition.1 The Committee reports that many capital market participants, large institutional investors and market intermediaries ar- gue that Canada’s international competitiveness suffers as a result of the current structure and that it is disadvantaged internationally because of its regulatory system. The Task Force to Modernize Securities Legisla- tion in Canada was commissioned in June 2005 by the Investment Dealers Association of Canada, with the mandate of making recommen- dations to modernize securities legislation in Canada that would main- tain or enhance the competitiveness of Canada’s capital markets. The general hypothesis underlying these reports is that the competitiveness of the Canadian securities market is indeed low and that Canada lacks the conditions to attract and keep new listings and trading volume. This concern relative to the competitiveness of the Canadian se- curities market has been exacerbated by the global situation of intensified competition among exchanges and by an apparent decline in the relative weight of North American Markets. The decrease in the relative share of initial offerings resulting from a shift to London Alternative Invest- ment Market (the AIM), launched in 1995, as well as the Asian markets, has raised serious concerns south of the border, as clearly illustrated in the report commissioned by the mayor of New York and Senator Schu- mer.2 This report notes a decline of 4% to 7% in New York’s relative 1 Wise Person Committee, It’s Time (Ottawa: Report to the Minister of Finance, Government of Canada, 2003) online: Ͻhttp://www.wise-averties.ca/reports/WPC%20Final.pdfϾ [It’s Time]. 2 McKinsey & Company, Sustaining New York’s and the U.S.’ Global Financial Services Leadership (New York: Report commissioned by New York’s Mayor and Senator Schumer, THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE CANADIAN STOCK MARKET 289 share of financings and the loss of a significant number of jobs in the financial sector, and attributes this situation to regulatory causes, among others. In a work entitled The Competitive Position of London as a Global Financial Centre, Yeandle et al.,3 evidence the strong increase in the volume of equity transactions on the London Stock Exchange relative to the New York Stock Exchange. A recent paper by Rousseau4 evidences that the AIM has been extremely successful in attracting investors and issuers, including a number of Canadian public companies. However, Rousseau concludes that the importation to Canada of the regulatory model used by the AIM would be very difficult. The present article is justified by the observation that, even if the lack of competitiveness of the Canadian securities market is underlined in numerous documents and reports, evidence of the current and past situation of the Canadian stock market relative to the other developed markets is scarce. Harris advocates more empirical analysis to inform the debate on securities regulation in Canada. He contends that “the debate in Canada [...] typically has not been informed by robust empirical analysis.”5 Probably because of the lack of empirical evidence, opinions about the strength of the Canadian market diverge considerably. The various reports wrote by the successive task forces in Canada generally evoked the lack of competitiveness of the market. However, for Boisvert and Gaa “In Canada, the number of shares traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSE) has doubled in the last five years, while the dollar value of trading has increased three-fold. Some 49 per cent of Canadians now hold equities in some form, twice the level of involvement recorded only 2006) online: Ͻhttp://www.senate.gov/ϳschumer/SchumerWebsite/pressroom/special reports/2007/NY REPORT%20 FINAL.pdfϾ; See also L. Zingales, Is the U.S. Capital Market Losing its Competitive Edge?, ECGI – Finance Working Paper (2007) 192 online: Ͻhttp://ssrn.com/abstractϭ1028701Ͼ. 3 M. Yeandle, M. Mainelli, & A. Berendt, The Competitive Position of London as a Global Financial Centre, (Corporation of London’s Report, 2005) online: Ͻhttp:// www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/131B4294-698B-4FAF-9758-080CCE86A36C/ 0/BC RS compposition FR.pdfϾ. 4 S. Rousseau, “London Calling?: The Experience of the Alternative Investment Market and the Competitiveness of Canadian Stock Exchanges” (2007) 23:1 B.F.L.R. 51. 5 D. A. Harris, “A Symposium on Canadian Securities Regulation: Harmonization or Nation- alization?” (2002) [unpublished, online: Ͻhttp://www.tsx.com/en/tradingServices/docs/2279SymposiumBrochure.pdfϾ at 3]. 290 BANKING & FINANCE LAW REVIEW [24 B.F.L.R.] 11 years ago.”6 According to Jenkinson and Ljungqvist, Canada ranks ahead of the U.S., Japan and the U.K. in terms of increases in stock exchange listings from 1981 to 1998.7 Freedman and Engert conclude that “data do not provide much support for the view that domestic capital markets have been abandoned by Canadian firms or hollowed out in recent years.”8 The discrepancy of opinions regarding trends in the Canadian stock markets can be traced primarily to the lack of clear-cut evidence. Ex- ploiting the historical data pertaining to the Canadian markets is a real challenge, due to several changes in the market and in the reporting methods. Most data available for Canada are provided by the stock exchanges and are characterized by several difficulties: The merger of several exchanges, double counting of several stocks before the merger of the exchanges, the merger and the associated delisting of several securities and the inclusion at the beginning of the 1990s of several large foreign corporations in the estimation of the Canadian stock market capitalization, followed by their exclusion during the 1990s. Moreover, divergent opinions about the health of the Canadian stock market are fostered by the specific situation of this market in terms of cross-listing. According to Karolyi, Canada has the world’s largest number of secu- rities listed abroad (211 in 2002); the next country is Israel, with 59 foreign listings.9 Several Canadian-based corporations post high trans- action volumes on American stock markets, specifically corporations listed on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quo- tations (NASDAQ).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TMX GROUP INC. 2011 Annual Report the TMX Factors Four Key Factors Contribute to TMX Group’S Success
    TMX GROUP INC. GROUP TMX 2011 ANNU 2011 A L REPOR L T THE FACTORS TMX GROUP INC. 2011 ANNUAL REPORT The TMX Factors Four key factors contribute to TMX Group’s success. Together they enable the company to deliver strong results, drive innovation and create growth. 1Critical Economic Infrastructure 2Commitment to Innovation Exchanges and clearing houses play unique and central The market demands that our company remain roles in the economy: exchanges facilitate capital technologically innovative as well as proactive with formation, enhance market efficiency and provide our product and service offerings. TMX Group teams vital risk management tools; clearinghouses provide work continuously to ensure that we anticipate, meet an important infrastructure that mitigates risk and and exceed our clients’ needs for speed, functionality, strengthens the market. TMX Group operates exchanges global connectivity and investment choice. in equities, derivatives and energy, and provides clearing services in derivatives and energy – all are essential to the efficiency of the Canadian capital markets. 3SME and Resources Specialization 4Canada’s Strength Canada’s economy, while broadly diversified, has Canada has a strong and well-developed economy particular strengths in natural resources and small- with a top-tier credit rating, the lowest net debt-to- to-medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Toronto Stock GDP ratio in the G7, well-regulated financial markets Exchange and TSX Venture Exchange are global leaders and a sound banking system. Our country’s strong in mining, energy and clean technology and have economic fundamentals make our market attractive significant expertise in supporting the growth of to international investors. TMX Group travels the globe SMEs.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Application from TSX Venture Exchange Inc. For
    ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION NOTICE Continued Recognition of TSX Venture Exchange Inc., formerly the Canadian Venture Exchange Inc., Following Reorganization of TSX Inc. July 26, 2002 Summary The Alberta Securities Commission (the “Commission”) and the British Columbia Securities Commission (the “BCSC”) are publishing the application of the TSX Venture Exchange Inc. (the “Exchange”) to revise its current recognition order to reflect: · the Exchange’s legal name change from the Canadian Venture Exchange Inc. to TSX Venture Exchange Inc./Bourse de croissance TSX Inc.; · the legal name change of The Toronto Stock Exchange Inc. to TSX Inc. (“TSX) · the proposed reorganization of TSX; and · the arrangement by which the Exchange has retained Market Regulation Services Inc. (“RS Inc.”) as its regulation services provider to provide certain regulatory functions. TSX Reorganization Under the proposed reorganization of TSX, 1. TSX will become a wholly owned subsidiary of a new holding company, TSX Group Inc. (“TSX Group”); 2. the Exchange will continue to be a wholly owned subsidiary of TSX; and 3. TSX Group will provide corporate services, such as financial services, accounting, payroll, human resources, administration, legal and corporate information technology services, to TSX and the Exchange. Following completion of the reorganization, TSX Group intends to conduct an initial public offering and seek a listing of its shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange, a division of TSX. TSX and TSX Group application to the OSC TSX is recognized by the Ontario Securities Commission (the “OSC”) under a recognition order dated January 29, 2002 (the “TSX Order”). TSX and TSX Group have applied to the OSC to amend the TSX Order to provide the terms and conditions under which each of TSX and TSX Group are to be recognized as a stock exchange in Ontario and to reflect the TSX reorganization and the legal name change of TSX.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anatomy of Stock Exchange Mergers with a Case Study of the LSE-TMX Merger
    An Anatomy of Stock Exchange Mergers with a Case Study of the LSE-TMX Merger Patrick Philips Royal Bank of Canada Alex Faseruk Memorial University of Newfoundland Ian Glew Memorial University of Newfoundland This study reviews the literature surrounding the economic and strategic financial implications of stock exchange mergers. It examines these tenets in a case study of the failed merger negotiations between the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and the TMX Group. The LSE, as the fourth largest stock exchange in the world, is one of the oldest and most prestigious stock exchanges. It has evolved from a coffee house in its beginnings to a cyber cafe today. The TMX Group holds extensive assets in Canada including its crown jewels, the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) (the seventh largest exchange in the world), the TSX Venture Exchange and the Montreal Exchange. Had the merger been successful the merged exchange would have been the third largest exchange with a market presence, products and centers of excellence across many national boundaries. INTRODUCTION As recently as two decades ago, stock exchanges mergers were not common, but in the current economic climate, these unions are quickly becoming a global phenomenon. Companies seeking to enlarge their market presence benefit from listing on a domestic exchange and in a foreign market(s) through arrangements that cross international borders. In 2006, a frenzy was witnessed in mergers and acquisitions in various exchanges. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange acquired CBOT Holdings Inc. for $11.1 billion. NYSE Group paid $10.2 billion for Euronext NV and also purchased Archipelago Holdings for $2.6 billion in order to enable entry into electronic trading.
    [Show full text]
  • Revoked Per 2011 Abasc
    REVOKED BOR# 35-501 (AB) A L B E R T A S E C U R I T I E S C O M M I S S I O N IN THE MATTER OF The Securities Act PER (SA 1981, c. S-6.1, as amended) (the "Act") - and - 2011 IN THE MATTER OF Trades by Certain Dealers In Securities Listed on the Canadian Venture Exchange Inc. O R D E R ABASC (Subsection 116(1)) 1. WHEREAS the Vancouver Stock Exchange (the “VSE”), The Alberta Stock Exchange (the “ASE”), The Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSE”) and The Montreal Exchange (the “ME”) entered into an agreement dated March 15, 1999 (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which each of 497 the exchanges agreed to resume exclusive listing functions for certain types of publicly traded securities in Canada’s capital markets; 2. AND WHEREAS the Agreement contemplated the VSE and ASE combining to form a new exchange for the purpose of providing trading facilities and related services for securities of junior issuers; 3. AND WHEREAS on November 26, 1999 the ASE and the VSE merged (the “Merger”) to form the Canadian Venture Exchange Inc. (“CDNX”); 4. AND WHEREAS CDNX has been recognized as an exchange by the Alberta Securities Commission (the “Commission”) and the British Columbia Securities Commission; 5. AND WHEREAS “Remote Access Trade” means a trade in a security executed on CDNX by use of a terminal outside of Alberta that provides access to the trading systems of CDNX; 6. AND WHEREAS the Commission is satisfied that to do so would not be prejudicial to the public interest; 7.
    [Show full text]
  • TSX Venture Exchange
    POLICY 1.1 INTERPRETATION 1. Definitions 1.1 The definitions provided in this Manual (which includes the Policies, Forms and Appendices) may differ from the definitions in the Securities Laws for the same or similar terms. The definitions apply only to this Manual. 1.2 In this Manual: “Affiliate” means a Company that is affiliated with another company as described in section 2. “Agent” means a Person that, as agent, offers for sale or sells securities in connection with a distribution and that is permitted pursuant to applicable Securities Laws to perform this function. “Agent’s Option” means a non-transferable compensation option to acquire securities of an Issuer, granted by an Issuer to an Agent as consideration for an Agent conducting a financing for the Issuer. “Aggregate Pro Group” means all Persons who are members of any Pro Group whether or not the Member is involved in a contractual relationship with the Issuer to provide financing, sponsorship and other advisory services. “Agreement in Principle” means in connection with a Qualifying Transaction, the meaning provided at Policy 2.4 - Capital Pool Companies. “Application for Listing” means a formal application by an Issuer or Resulting Issuer for a listing on the Exchange. “Approved Expenditures” means any exploration expenditures resulting or arising from, or relating to, geological and scientific surveys conducted on a mineral property where such surveys advanced a mineral project or enhanced the Issuer's geoscientific database but does not include any of the following costs or expenses: general and administrative, land maintenance, public affairs, required property payments, staking, property or project acquisition, flight expenditures of personnel where the project or property is non-domestic, tax and GST.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsx Venture Exchange Rule Book Table of Contents
    TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE RULE BOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule A. 1.00 – Interpretation .................................................................................................... 1 A1.01 – Definitions .................................................................................................................. 1 A1.02 – Rules of Construction: ..............................................................................................12 A1.03 – Interpretation Not Affected by Division, Heading, etc: ...............................................12 A1.04 – Application of Trading Rules and Policies .................................................................12 Rule B.1.00 – Power to List and Delist...................................................................................13 B.1.01 ....................................................................................................................................13 Rule B.2.00 – Sponsorship and Sponsor Report ..................................................................14 B.2.01 ....................................................................................................................................14 B.2.02 ....................................................................................................................................14 B.2.03 ....................................................................................................................................14 B.2.04 ....................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Expired 31 Dec 2001
    EXPIRED BOR#46-504 (AB) A L B E R T A S E C U R I T I E S C O M M I S S I O N 31 IN THE MATTER OF The Securities Act DEC (SA 1981, c. S-6.1, as amended) (the "Act") - and - 2001 IN THE MATTER OF An Exemption from the Requirements of Alberta Securities Commission Rule 46-501 - Junior Capital Pool Offerings for Issuers listed on the Canadian Venture Exchange Inc. O R D E R (Subsection 186(1)) 1. WHEREAS on November 26, 1999 the Alberta Securities Commission (the “Commission”) issued an order (the “Initial Order”), a copy of which is attached as Appendix A, providing transitional relief from the requirements of Alberta Rule 46-501 - (the “JCP Rule”) for certain issuers undertaking an offering, in whole or in part, under the capital pool company program (the “CPC Program”) adopted by the Canadian Venture Exchange (“CDNX”); 2. AND WHEREAS the Initial Order was subsequently amended by an order of the Commission dated March 8, 2000 (BOR# 46-503) to extend the expiry date of the Initial Order from March 31, 2000 to June 30, 2000; 3. AND WHEREAS the CPC Program replaced the junior capital pool program offered by the Alberta Stock Exchange (the “ASE”) and the venture capital pool program offered by the Vancouver Stock Exchange (the “VSE”) prior to the merger of the ASE and the VSE on November 26, 1999 to form CDNX; 4. AND WHEREAS the Initial Order, as amended, will expire on its terms on June 30, 2000 unless the JCP Rule has been amended or replaced prior to that date; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Approval by All Commissions Will Be Forthcoming
    NOTICE OF PROPOSED NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS AND COMPANION POLICIES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT NOTICE OF PROPOSED NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 21-101 MARKETPLACE OPERATION, COMPANION POLICY 21-101CP AND FORMS 21-101F1, 21-101F2, 21-101F3 AND 21-101F4 AND NOTICE OF PROPOSED NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 23-101 TRADING RULES AND COMPANION POLICY 23-101CP AND DISCUSSION PAPER ENTITLED “CONSOLIDATION PLAN FOR A CONSOLIDATED CANADIAN MARKET” Introduction The Commission, together with the other members of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) staff, are publishing for comment proposed National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation ("NI 21-101”), Companion Policy 21-101CP (“Companion Policy 21-101CP”), Forms 21-101F1, 21-101F2, 21-101F3 and 21-101F4 (the “Forms”), proposed National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules (“NI 23-101”), Companion Policy 23-101CP (“Companion Policy 23-101CP”) and a Discussion paper on a Plan for a Consolidated Canadian Market (“The Consolidation Plan”). The CSA are also publishing a Background Paper, attached hereto as Appendix “A”, entitled “Regulation of Alternative Trading Systems in Canada” presenting the history and debate on the issues concerning the operation of alternative trading systems (“ATSs”) in Canada. The documents currently being published for comment have been prepared by a working committee of CSA staff. The documents have been formally approved by some, but not all, commissions. In light of the desire to publish the ATS proposal, the documents are being published now for public comment. It is expected that formal approval by all commissions will be forthcoming. The proposed National Instruments, Forms and Companion Policies are initiatives of the CSA. The proposed National Instruments are proposed to be adopted as rules in each of British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Ontario, as a Commission regulation in Saskatchewan and as a policy in each of the other jurisdictions represented by the CSA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Report Tmx Group Limited
    2012 ANNUAL REPORT TMX GROUP LIMITED TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE | MONTREAL EXCHANGE | TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE | TMX SELECT | ALPHA | CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CLEARING CORPORATION | THE CANADIAN DEPOSITORY FOR SECURITIES LIMITED | NGX | BOX | SHORCAN EQUICOM | TMX DATALINX | TMX ATRIUM | TMX TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS | TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE MONTREAL EXCHANGE | TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE | TMX SELECT | ALPHA | CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CLEARING CORPORATION THE CANADIAN DEPOSITORY FOR SECURITIES LIMITED | NGX | BOX | SHORCAN | EQUICOM | TMX DATALINX TMX ATRIUM | TMX TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS | TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE | MONTREAL EXCHANGE | TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE TMX SELECT | ALPHA | CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CLEARING CORPORATION | THE CANADIAN DEPOSITORY FOR SECURITIES LIMITED SHORCAN | EQUICOM | TMX DATALINX | TMX ATRIUM | TMX TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS | TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE MONTREAL EXCHANGE | TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE | TMX SELECT | ALPHA | CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CLEARING CORPORATION | THE CANADIAN DEPOSITORY FOR SECURITIES LIMITED | SHORCAN | NGX 1 | BOX | TMX 2 CONTENTS Letter from the Chair 3 Letter from the CEO 4 Statement of Corporate Governance Practices 6 2012 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 11 Management Statement 116 Independent Auditors’ Report 117 Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes 119 Board of Directors 200 TMX Group Executive Committee 201 Shareholder Information 202 2 LETTER FROM THE CHAIR I am pleased to write my first letter as Chair of the Board of Directors of TMX Group Limited. Since the appointment of this new Board on July 31, 2012, it has been my privilege to serve with an outstanding and dedicated group of professionals who share a deep commitment to the long-term success of this company and of Canada’s capital markets. There is no doubt that 2012 was a milestone year for TMX Group. The successful completion of the Maple transaction and the addition of CDS and Alpha to TMX Group brought together over 1,300 highly skilled professionals with deep know-how across a wide spectrum of businesses.
    [Show full text]