Iii. Project Description
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – Work-In-Progress IV.C Visual Resources
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. VISUAL RESOURCES 1. INTRODUCTION New development can affect the aesthetic quality of a community. This section will address the potential impacts that could result from the proposed Project with regard to aesthetics, views, light and glare, and shade/shadow. Aesthetics refers to the overall visual qualities of an area or within a given field of view. Aesthetics includes aspects such as size, shape, color, texture, and general composition, as well as the relationships between these elements. Aesthetic features often consist of unique or prominent natural or man-made attributes or several small features that, when viewed together, create a whole that is visually interesting or appealing. The degree of visual access to an aesthetic resource contributes to the value of aesthetic features. The analysis of aesthetics as presented below addresses the Project's visual relationship with existing and future known land uses in the surrounding area, as well as consistency of the proposed Project with the applicable regulatory environment (e.g., West Los Angeles Community Plan). The analysis of views focuses on the extent to which the Project may interfere with visual access to aesthetic features. Viewsheds are those areas that can be seen from a particular location. Existing views may be partially obstructed or entirely blocked by modifications to the environment. Conversely, modifications to the natural or man-made landscape of an area may create or enhance view opportunities. In general, visual access is closely tied to topography and distance from a visual resource (i.e., something that someone wants to look at). Light impacts are typically associated with the use of artificial light during the evening and nighttime hours. -
Printmgr File
bridgebuildermutualfunds.com BRIDGE BUILDER SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS DISCLOSURES Schedule of Investments are shown as of the date indicated and are unaudited. Since market conditions fluctuate suddenly and frequently, the Schedule of Investments may change and this list is not indicative of the current or future portfolio composition. These Schedule of Investments are not intended to be and do not constitute recommendations that others buy, sell, or hold any of the securities listed. You should consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus and summary prospectus contain this and other information. Edward Jones owns directly or indirectly 100% of the investment adviser to the Bridge Builder Funds. Please refer to the Funds’ prospectus for further information. Your Edward Jones financial advisor can provide a prospectus or summary prospectus, which should be read carefully before investing. You may also obtain a prospectus by going to http://www.bridgebuildermutualfunds.com/literature/. You could lose money by investing in a Fund. Past performance does not guarantee future results. BRIDGE BUILDER MUTUAL FUNDS The Bridge Builder Funds are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc. There is no affiliation between ALPS Distributors, Inc. and Bridge Builder Trust and any of its affiliates and subsidiaries. Copyright © 2021 Bridge Builder Trust. All rights reserved. BBT000154 7/31/2023 ˆ200FP6pK@1!=xVtGSŠ 200FP6pK@1!=xVtGS VDI-W7-PF3-0355 BRIDGE BUILDER MUTUA Donnelley Financial14.4.13.0 -
CF 2019-CF3 Mortgage Trust
Presale: CF 2019-CF3 Mortgage Trust December 3, 2019 PRIMARY CREDIT ANALYST Preliminary Ratings Andy A White, CFA Centennial Class(i) Preliminary rating Preliminary amount ($)(ii) Credit enhancement (%) (1) 303-721-4890 A-1 AAA (sf) 15,390,000 30.000 andy.white @spglobal.com A-2 AAA (sf) 58,585,000 30.000 SECONDARY CONTACT A-SB AAA (sf) 21,534,000 30.000 Della Cheung A-3 AAA (sf) TBD(iii) 30.000 New York A-4 AAA (sf) TBD(iii) 30.000 (1) 212-438-3691 della.cheung X-A(iv) AAA (sf) 537,303,000 N/A @spglobal.com X-B(iv) A- (sf) 146,800,000 N/A A-S AAA (sf) 84,434,000 19.000 B AA (sf) 31,663,000 14.875 C A- (sf) 30,703,000 10.875 X-D(iv)(v) NR 34,541,000 N/A D(v) BBB- (sf) 19,189,000 8.375 E(v) NR 15,352,000 6.375 F-RR(v) NR 7,675,000 5.375 G-RR(v) NR 7,676,000 4.375 H-RR(v) NR 8,635,000 3.250 J-RR(v) NR 24,947,113 0.000 VRR Interest(vi) NR 21,551,091 N/A Note: This presale report is based on information as of Dec. 3, 2019. The ratings shown are preliminary. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings. Accordingly, the preliminary ratings should not be construed as evidence of final ratings. This report does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell securities. -
Selected Criticism, Jeffery Jullich
Selected Criticism Jeffrey Jullich Publishing the Unpublishable 017 ©2007 /ubu editions Series Editor: Kenneth Goldsmith /ubu editions www.ubu.com 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Aaron Shurin: The Paradise of Forms 5 Standard Schaefer: Nova 9 Leslie Scalapino: New Time 12 Cole Swensen: Try 15 Susan Howe / Susan Bee: Bed Hangings I 17 Graham Foust: As in Every Deafness 24 Rae Armantrout: Up to Speed 25 Michael Scharf: Verité 26 Drew Gardner: Sugar Pill 29 SELECTED BUFFALO POETICS LISTSERV POSTS Class and poetry 39 Lyn Hejinian's 'deen' 41 D=E=E=N 42 A Barnard report: Hannah Weiner 45 Spaced-out 47 Questions on a HOW TO value 49 Submission crucible 52 $3.50 Summer vacation in Scandinavia 54 Alternative 56 Farm implements and rutabagas in a landscape 58 Polyverse by Lee Ann Brown 60 Cut-ups and homosexualization of the New York School (I) 63 Cut-ups and homosexualization of the New York School (II) 65 Simon Perchik 67 Marilyn Monroe - the Emma Lazarus of her day 69 classical meter in contemporary "free verse" poetry Meter Anthology Cola 70 New Formalist Language Poetry 72 Language Prosody - ex. 2: Dochmiacs 74 Language Prosody - ex. 3: hypodochmiacs in Susan Howe's Pierce Arrow 76 Language Prosody - ex. 4: adonics 78 Language Prosody - ex. 5: H.D., Helen in Egypt 85 Timothy McVeigh's face 89 Hannah Weiner's hallucinations and schizophrenia in poetry Hannah's visions 93 Hannah's visions - Barrett Watten's 'Autobiography Simplex' 95 Hannah's visions 99 eulogy for Tove Janesson (Finnish author of the Mummintroll books) 103 3 creative writing pedagogy 104 -
Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
1350 ALA MOANA BUILDING HABS HI-584 1350 Ala Moana Boulevard HABS HI-584 Honolulu Honolulu County Hawaii PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY PACIFIC WEST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY 1350 ALA MOANA BUILDING HABS No. HI-584 Location: 1350 Ala Manoa is situated at the corner of Ala Moana Boulevard and Pi`ikoi Street in downtown Honolulu, Honolulu County, on the island of Oah`u, Hawai`i. The ocean front property is located approximately 500’ from the southern coastline of Oah`u between Kaka`ako and Waikiki, adjacent to Ala Moana Regional Park and Ala Moana Shopping Center. The area surrounding the building is dominated by residential high rise and commercial structures. The building is part of the commercial, retail, and residential district of Ala Moana, which is south of Makiki, east of Kaka`ako, and west of Waikīkī. 21.291794, -157.848113 (4N) Significance: 1350 Ala Moana, together with its site features, is historically significant under National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Criterion A for its association with the expansion of Hawai`i’s post-Statehood population and the emergence of the high rise apartment as a pervasive building type in the Modern period in Honolulu architecture (1955-1979). At the time of construction in 1968, 1350 Ala Moana became the state’s tallest building at 33 stories, surpassing the previous record holder, the Ala Moana Building. It remained the tallest building in the state until 1970, and is also significant under Criterion C as an excellent example of Hawai`i Modernism and the work of a master, architect Minoru Yamasaki. -
Joint Public Statement for Immediate Release Contact
JOINT PUBLIC STATEMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Cindy Olnick, Los Angeles Conservancy (213.430.4214, [email protected]) Jenni Brewer, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington, D.C. (202.588.6380, [email protected]) Barbara Casey, on behalf of Next Century Associates (310.473.8090, [email protected]) CENTURY PLAZA OWNERS AND PRESERVATION GROUPS ANNOUNCE REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT PRESERVES HOTEL LOS ANGELES – FEBRUARY 11, 2010 – The owners of the Century Plaza Hotel, Next Century Associates, along with the Los Angeles Conservancy and the National Trust for Historic Preservation, today announced plans for a revised development project that would preserve the famed hotel. Next Century Associates originally proposed a project that called for the demolition of the historic hotel and redevelopment of the property with a mixed use project comprising hotel, residential, office, retail, public plazas, and open space. In 2009, the National Trust listed the hotel as one of America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places. At the urging of Los Angeles City Councilmember Paul Koretz, the Los Angeles Conservancy, the National Trust, and Next Century Associates worked collaboratively to come up with a proposal that would preserve the hotel while allowing for new development on the property. “Next Century’s willingness to embrace a plan that preserves the hotel is a great step forward,” said Councilmember Koretz. “The process serves as a model of how a developer can work together with the preservation community to bring forward a solution that preserves an important structure, allows future development on the property, and better serves the goals of the community.” Page 1 The revised development project will preserve the existing hotel building while providing a mix of residential, office, and retail uses on the property. -
Conservancy Comments on the Draft
September 8, 2011 Submitted by email Mr. Hadar Plafkin Environmental Review Coordinator Los Angeles Department of City Planning 200 North Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Email: [email protected] Re: Century Plaza Mixed-Use Development Draft EIR, ENV-2008-4950-EIR Dear Mr. Plafkin: On behalf of the Los Angeles Conservancy, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Century Plaza Mixed-Use Development. The Los Angeles Conservancy is the largest local historic preservation organization in the United States, with over 6,000 members. Established in 1978, the Conservancy works to preserve and revitalize the significant architectural heritage of Los Angeles through advocacy and education. The Conservancy’s all-volunteer Modern Committee has been at the forefront of preserving mid-century architecture since its inception in 1984. When the initial Century Plaza Development project (Option A) was announced in late 2008 calling for the demolition of the Century Plaza Hotel, the Conservancy embarked on a wide-ranging advocacy effort to raise awareness about the significance of the hotel and find preservation solutions that retain the hotel while meeting the goals of the applicant, Next Century Associates. At the request of Los Angeles City Councilmember Paul Koretz, extensive discussions followed in late 2009 with Next Century Associates’ project team, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and the Conservancy. We are pleased to see that the preferred project (Option B) and several alternatives evaluated in the Draft EIR preserve the Century Plaza Hotel as a historic resource so that it may continue to be a vital asset and cultural touchstone for Los Angeles. -
2000 Avenue of the Stars Draft Environmental Impact
2000 AVENUE OF THE STARS DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Lead Agency: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING 200 North Spring Street 7 th Floor Los Angeles, California 90012 SCH #2002011024 ENV-2001-4027-EIR Project Applicant: TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY 2049 Century Park East Suite 2650 Los Angeles, California 90067 EIR Consultant: ENVICOM CORPORATION 28328 Agoura Road Agoura Hills, California 91301 August 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 46 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 66 V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 74 A. AESTHETICS 74 1. Visual Qualities 74 2. Light and Glare 89 3. Shading 93 B. AIR QUALITY 101 1. Emissions 101 2. Wind 120 C. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 123 D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 128 E. GEOLOGY 133 F. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 141 G. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY 149 H. LAND USE 154 I. NOISE 175 J. POPULATION AND HOUSING 187 K. PUBLIC SERVICES 197 1. Fire Protection 197 2. Police Protection 201 3. Schools 203 4. Libraries 207 L. RECREATION AND PARKS 209 M. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 213 N. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEM 248 1. Wastewater 248 2. Stormwater 252 3. Water Supply 256 4. Solid Waste 262 5. Electricity 267 VI. ALTERNATIVES 272 VII. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND IRREVERSIBLE 303 ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES VIII. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS 304 IX. MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN 306 X. PREPARERS OF THE EIR, CONTACTS AND REFERENCES 323 XI. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 329 2000 Avenue of the Stars Project Draft EIR ENV-2001-4027-EIR Page i August 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES -
Century City TOD and Walk Access Study
` WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT Century City TOD and Walk Access Study February 2012 Century City TOD and Walk Access Study Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Key Findings .................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 STUDY OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Analysis Summary ........................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Assumptions ................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 Key Findings .................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.5.1 Distance Matters ................................................................................................ 2-3 2.5.2 Influence of the Walking -
Surveyla Survey Report Template
Historic Resources Survey Report West Los Angeles Community Plan Area Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: SAPPHOS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Pasadena, CA August 15, 2012 Table of Contents Project Overview 1 SurveyLA Methodology Summary 1 Project Team 3 Survey Area 3 Designated Resources 10 Community Plan Area Survey Methodology 12 Summary of Findings 14 Summary of Property Types 14 Summary of Contexts and Themes 16 For Further Reading 44 Appendices Appendix A: Individual Resources Appendix B: Non-Parcel Resources Appendix C: Historic Districts & Planning Districts SurveyLA West Los Angeles Community Plan Area Project Overview This historic resources survey report (“Survey Report”) has been completed on behalf of the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning’s Office of Historic Resources (OHR) for the SurveyLA historic resources survey of the West Los Angeles Community Plan Area (CPA). This project was undertaken from September 2011 to May 2012 by Sapphos Environmental, Inc. This Survey Report provides a summary of the work completed, including a description of the survey area; an overview of the field methodology; a summary of relevant contexts, themes, and property types; and complete lists of all surveyed resources. This Survey Report is intended to be used in conjunction with the SurveyLA Field Results Master Report (“Master Report”), which provides a detailed discussion of SurveyLA methodology and explains the terms used in this report and associated appendices. The Master Report, Survey Report, Appendices, and Results Map are available at www.surveyla.org. SurveyLA Methodology Summary Below is a brief summary of SurveyLA methodology. -
Emergency Communication
Emergency Communication Minimizing the Static Fox Plaza building beefs up security with new intercom system By Karina Sanchez he Fox Plaza building made its utives work out of the building. And, until volved more of a process, delaying the re- it. So we had several intercom systems that movie debut in the 1988 flick recently, intercoms throughout the build- sponse time of the security guard. weren’t working, and we could not repair “Die Hard.” Under the guise of ing, in elevators and in parking lots were “When you pressed a button on the pre- them,” Weber said. the Nakatomi Plaza building, maintained by old wires, providing static- vious intercom system, a code would come What the building needed was a total up- T filled communication. A new intercom up on the screen, and the security officer grade. The Fox building engineers wanted it was overtaken by a group of terrorists looking to steal millions of dollars from a system was long overdue, and in June would not really know where that person the same, but on the condition that the inte- Japanese company. Ironically, the real Fox 2004, systems integrator Alliance Securi- was,” said Ben Weber, chief engineer, Fox grator use the operable wires that were al- Plaza building spent years with an outdated ty teamed with the Fox Plaza building Plaza. “They’d have to pull out a binder and ready in place. With TOA’s VS-900, this intercom system, leaving poor communica- and TOA Electronics to revamp the inter- look up a number and cross-reference the condition was a welcomed challenge. -
Download This
2280 NPS Form 10-900 ^ Ktl*-1^^**—-~~ | |DMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Sb |3 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property___________________________________________________ historic name Fox Fullerton Theatre Complex____________________________ other names/site number Chapman's Alician Court Theatre; Chapman Theatre; Mission Court Theatre; Universal Mission Court Theatre; Fox Mission Theatre; Fox Fullerton Theatre; Firestone Tire and Rubber Building; Roy J. Lyon Firestone Service Station____________________________ 2. Location street & number 500-512 North Harbor Boulevard Fullerton NA D not for publication city or town Fullerton ____________________ ___NA O vicinity state California________ code CA county Orange_ code 059_ zip code 92832 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this E nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Pla meets the proc idural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.