Biochemistry in Bacterioferritin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biochemistry in Bacterioferritin BIOCHEMISTRY IN BACTERIOFERRITIN by Uthaiwan Suttisansanee A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Chemistry Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2006 © Uthaiwan Suttisansanee 2006 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Bacterioferritin, an iron storage protein having a 24-subunit (α24) quaternary structure, was used as a model for the study of host-guest interactions and guest encapsulation, making use of its spherical cage-like structure. A hexahistidine-affinity tag fused to the C-terminus of each bacterioferritin subunit was constructed. The C-terminus of each subunit points toward the inside of the cavity, while the N-terminus is exposed on the surface of the protein. The hexaHistag was able to form strong interactions with a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid linked dye molecule (guest) and this interaction was used in attempts to develop a principle to control guest molecule encapsulation within the spherical cavity of the 24-mer bacterioferritin protein molecule. The procedure involved (1) subunit dissociation under acidic pH, (2) affinity controlled dye-Histag binding with exposed C-terminal (His)6 residues and (3) reassociation of the subunits at neutral pH. The encapsulation conditions involving step 1 and 3 were studied preliminarily using laser light scattering to measure size (hydrodynamic radius) of the protein particle with apoferritin as a model system as it resembles the size and structure of bacterioferritin. In order to encapsulate guest molecules, the emptied shell of bacterioferritin was generated by site-directed mutagenesis resulting in ferroxidase- as well as heme-free bacterioferritin mutants (E18A/M52L/E94A), and these mutants were used to examine protein stability before conducting encapsulation experiments. However, wild-type bacterioferritin possessed highest stability in maintaining its multisubunit structure; hence, it was used for the encapsulation studies. It was found that 100% bacterioferritin with His6-tag at the C-terminus, and a combination of 60% bacterioferritin with His6-tag at the C-terminus and 40% bacterioferritin without His6-tag at the C-terminus yielded similar amounts of encapsulated iii guest molecules. This suggested that all hexahistidine at the C-terminus were not equally available for dye molecule binding. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my sincere thank to Dr. John Honek, my supervisor, for giving me the opportunity to work on this project. His advice, guidance, patience, and time are very appreciated. I also would like to thank Dr. Elisabeth Daub for her advice on protein engineering, Dr. Zhending Su for his advice on mass spectroscopy, and Liz Gargatsougias for information on bacterioferritin. I would like to give special thanks to the Meiering Lab for providing access to their Nanosizer ZS instrument, to Peter Stathopulos for sharing his knowledge of laser light scattering, to the Palmer Lab for providing a PTI Fluorometer, and to Shenhui Lang for her advice on fluorescence measurement. I also wish to acknowledge the Thai Government, Thailand for financial support during my graduate studies. I am grateful to Nicole Sukdeo, Pei Hang, and Paula Walasek for their expertise and their patience in teaching me how the lab works. I also would like to thank Christine Hand, Danish Khan, and Kadia Mullings for their support and encouragement. I cannot say anything else except “you guys are the best”. I would like to thank my family, Sacorn, Jewhiang, Rossukon, and Sasirada for their understanding and support. I am lucky that I was born in this family. I also would like to thank Platong for the courage and caring. In addition, I would like to thank my housemate, Ming Bao, for her cooking during a past year. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………… v TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………… vi LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………... x LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………..... xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………. xxv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1: Bacterial Iron Homeostasis…………………………………………………………. 1 1.1.1: Role of Iron in Living Organisms…………………………………………… 1 1.1.2: Iron Transporters……………………………………………………………..3 1.1.3: Iron Storage Proteins and Their Applications………………………………..8 1.1.4: Regulatory Role of Iron..……………………………………………………. 23 1.2: Escherichia coli Bacterioferritin…………………………………………………….. 25 1.2.1: Discovery of Bacterioferritin………………………………………………... 25 1.2.2: Overall Structure…………………………………………………………….. 26 1.2.3: Heme Binding Site…………………………………………………………... 31 1.2.4: Iron Core Formation………………………………………………………… 34 1.3: Nanotechnology and Encapsulation………………………………………………… 40 1.3.1: The Host…………………………………………………………………….. 40 1.3.2: The Guest…………………………………………………………….…….... 49 1.3.3: Linkage……………………………………………………………………… 51 1.3.4: Applications of Encapsulation Processes…………………………………… 56 1.4: Possible Aspects for Bacterioferritin Encapsulation………………………………. 57 1.5: Summary of Experimental Objectives Achieved…………………………………... 64 vi CHAPTER 2: CONDITIONAL TESTS FOR DISSOCIATION AND REASSOCIATION OF APOFERRITIN SUBUNITS USING LIGHT SCATTERING TECHNIQUES 2.1: Literature Research on Dissociation and Reassociation of Horse Spleen Apoferritin………………………………………………………………………………… 66 2.2: Reagents, Materials, and Equipment ……………………………………………… 72 2.3: Experimental Protocols……………………………………………………………… 73 2.4: Results and Discussion ……………………………………………………………… 76 2.4.1: Effect of Protein Concentration…………………………………………….. 76 2.4.2: Effect of pH…………………………………………………………………. 78 2.4.3: Effect of Electrolytes………………………………………………………... 79 2.4.4: Effect of Glycerol…………………………………………………………… 80 2.4.5: Effect of Incubation Time on Dissociation…………………………………. 81 2.4.6: Effect of Reassembly Time…………………………………………………. 82 2.5: Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………... 83 CHAPTER 3: OVEREXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION OF FERROXIDASE CENTER- AND HEME-FREE BACTERIOFERRITIN 3.1: Literature Research on the Ferroxidase Center- and Heme-free Bacterioferritin …………………………………………………………………………… 85 3.2: Reagents, Materials, and Equipment ………………………………………………. 87 3.3: Experimental Protocols……………………………………………………………… 90 3.3.1: Protocols for Control Experiments………………………………………….. 90 3.3.2: Protein Engineering…………………………………………………………. 93 3.3.3: Protein Expression, Induction, and Purification..…………………………… 97 3.4: Results and Discussion ……………………………………………………………… 101 3.4.1: Control Experiments on Protein Stability Conditions………………………. 101 3.4.2: Cloning of Wild-type and Bacterioferritin Mutants………………………… 107 3.4.3: Overexpression and Purification of Wild-type and Bacterioferritin Mutants.. 108 3.4.4: Protein Stability of Wild-type and Bacterioferritin Mutants…………………113 3.5: Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………120 vii CHAPTER 4: OVEREXPRESSION, PURIFICATION, AND ENCAPSULATION PROPERTIES OF C-TERMINAL HIS6-TAGGED BACTERIOFERRITIN 4.1: Literature Research on C-terminal Extension and Encapsulation of Bacterioferritin……………………………………………………………………………. 121 4.2: Reagents, Materials, and Equipment……………………………………………….. 125 4.3: Experimental Protocols……………………………………………………………… 125 4.3.1: Protein Engineering…………………………………………………………. 125 4.3.2: Protein Expression, Induction, and Purification ……………………………. 127 4.3.3: Identification of Dye Molecule……………………………………………… 128 4.3.4: Preparation for Encapsulation Experiments ………………………………... 134 4.3.5: Determination of the Fluorescence Quenching………………………………141 4.3.6: Measurement of Heme Groups Incorporated in Bacterioferritin …………… 142 4.3.7: Determination of the Presence of Iron Atoms in Bacterioferritin ………….. 143 4.3.8: Determination of the Number of Dye Molecules Encapsulated into Bacterioferritin………………………………………………………………. 143 4.4: Results and Discussion ……………………………………………………………… 144 4.4.1: DNA Cloning and Protein Purification……………………………………… 144 4.4.2: Dye Identification…………………………………………………………… 146 4.4.3: Optimum Conditions for Encapsulation of Bacterioferritin………………… 152 4.4.4: Control Experiments for Encapsulation by Bacterioferritin………………… 168 4.4.5: Fluorescence Quenching of the Dye Encapsulated Bacterioferritin………… 177 4.4.6: Heme-incorporated Encapsulated Bacterioferritin……….............................. 178 4.4.7: Iron Storage in Bacterioferritin ……………………………………………... 179 4.4.8: Dye Molecules Encapsulated in Bacterioferritin …………………………… 179 4.5: Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………... 180 CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY AND FUTURE WORK 5.1: Summary………………………………………………………………………………183 5.2: Future Work…………………………………………………………………………. 185 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………. 187 Appendix 1: Flow Chart for QuikChange® Site-directed Mutagenesis PCR……….. 203 Appendix 2: Flow Chart for Site-directed Mutagenesis of bFT-E94A ……………… 204 Appendix 3: Flow Chart for Protein Purification…………………………………….. 205 viii Appendix 4: Sequencing Results for Wild-type and Variants of Bacterioferritin……206 Appendix 5: Mass Spectrometric Results……………………………………………….217 Appendix 6: Spectrophotometric Results for Wild-type and Variants of Bacterioferritin……………………………………………………………. 227 Appendix 7: Gel Filtration Chromatographic Results (Superose 6) of Wild-type and Variants of Bacterioferritin…………………………………………. 232 Appendix 8: Calculation of Extinction Coefficient for Dye Molecules in Pro-Q® Sapphire 365 Oligohistidine
Recommended publications
  • Catalysis of Iron Core Formation in Escherichia Coli Bacterioferritin
    CATALYSIS OF IRON CORE FORMATION IN ESCHERICHIA COLI BACTERIOFERRITIN by Steve Wong B.Sc., The University of British Columbia, 2003 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2009 Steve Wong, 2009 ABSTRACT Iron is an essential element for almost all life, so iron homeostasis is an important concern for most living organisms. The chemical properties of iron as represented by the low aqueous solubility of ferric iron and the toxicity of hydroxyl radicals it can produce by means of the Fenton reaction make achievement of iron homeostasis both challenging and crucially important. Bacterioferritin (BFR) is a bacterial member of the ferritin family of proteins that stores iron as a microcrystalline ferric hydroxide core of ~2700 iron atoms. This core is surrounded by 24 identical protein subunits, each possessing a dinuclear iron centre that catalyzes the oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+. This structure affords storage, solubility and bioavailability of iron. To improve our incomplete knowledge of the mechanism of iron core formation, the properties of an assembly variant (Glu128Arg/Glu135Arg) and the wild-type of Escherichia coli BFR have been characterized by X-ray crystallography, site-directed mutagenesis, and iron oxidation kinetics. The crystal structure of the variant included two ethylene glycol (EG) molecules adjacent to the dinuclear (ferroxidase) site that catalyzes iron oxidation. One EG resides in the ferroxidase pore that provides a route from the solvent to the ferroxidase site. The other EG resides at the inner surface of the protein where the iron core presumably binds and is surrounded by three acidic residues: Glu47, Asp50, and Asp126.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioiron: Origin, Chemical Properties and Evolution
    BioIron 2019: Iron Essentials for Clinicians and Scientists BioIron: origin, chemical properties and evolution Kostas Pantopoulos Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research McGill University Iron: a highly abundant transition metal The elements in haiku by Mary Soon Lee, sciencemag.org Produced in the universe by fusion in high mass stars and scattered into space to accumulate in rocky planets like earth Most abundant element on earth (crust and inner core) 4th most abundant element on earth’s crust Electron configuration and oxidation states Fe2+: ferrous iron Fe3+: ferric iron Fe4+: ferryl iron (unstable intermediate) Coordination chemistry Iron readily forms complexes with organic molecules, and this has immense biological implications iron-sulfur clusters heme iron-oxo centers Iron cofactors can be utilized by proteins for: A wide range of electron transfer biochemical reactions within a broad electrochemical potential (Eo from -400 to +400 mV) Various other structural and metabolic functions Functions of proteins with iron cofactors Heme oxygen binding (hemoglobin, myoglobin) electron transfer reactions (cytochromes) catalysis (oxidases, peroxidases, NO synthases) hemoglobin Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters electron transfer reactions (ferredoxins, Rieske proteins) catalysis (aconitases, other dehydratases) activation of substrate (cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, other oxidases) transcriptional regulation (bacterial transcription factors FNR, SoxR) structure stabilization (bacterial endonuclease III) Iron-oxo (Fe-O-Fe) centers catalysis
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Iron Storage Proteins in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Bacterial Iron Homeostasis by Kate Eshelman
    The Role of Iron Storage Proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacterial Iron Homeostasis By Kate Eshelman Submitted to the graduate degree program in Chemistry and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chair: Mario Rivera, PhD. ________________________________ Heather Desaire, PhD. ________________________________ Krzysztof Kuczera, PhD. ________________________________ David Benson, PhD. ________________________________ Scott Hefty, PhD ________________________________ Josephine Chandler, PhD Date Defended: April 28th, 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Kate Eshelman certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Role of Iron Storage Proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacterial Iron Homeostasis ________________________________ Chair: Mario Rivera, PhD. Date approved: April 28th, 2016 ii Abstract Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative bacterium that causes infections in immune compromised patients. There have been an increasing number of multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa infections which is leading to the need to develop new targets for antibiotics. A potential new target is to disrupt iron homeostasis by disrupting the function of the iron storage protein, bacterioferritin B (BfrB). The structure and function of BfrB has been passionately studied in our lab, which has led to new understanding of iron uptake and iron release from BfrB. Iron mobilization from BfrB requires binding from the bacterioferritin-associated ferredoxin (Bfd), a process that our lab has demonstrated in vitro using X-ray crystallography, and binding studies. These studies also allowed the lab to determine the key residues in both proteins that stabilize the BfrB:Bfd complex. In my work, we have taken the insights from the in vitro studies and applied them to investigate the consequences of blocking the BfrB:Bfd interaction in P.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogenesis of Organelles and Membrane Proteins
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY 1988 Volume 16 Managing Editor D. C. WATTS London: The Biochemical Society © 1988 AUTHOR INDEX Aaronson, P. I. See Bolton, T. B. Altinel, A. See Wali, F. A. Augood, S. J. Abrahmsen, L. See Uhlen, M. Alving, C. R. See Richards, R. L. ; Emson, P. C; Crossman, A. R.; Ackrill, A. M Alwan, A. F. Marsden, D.; Legon, S. ; Blair, G. E. ; Jordan, P. M. Localization of enkephalin mRNA in Modulation of expression of major Isolation of uroporphyrinogen III the monkey. 313 histocompatibility class I genes in synthase from E. coli. 965 Austen, B. See Malik, Z.; Meredith, highly oncogenic adenovirus-trans= Amirali, S. See Saeed, S. A. C. formed rat cells. 605 Ancel, R. See Urban, P. F. Austen, B. M. See Hurley, P. R. Adam, L. P. See Hathaway, D. R. Anderson, A. J. See Haywood, G. W. Austin, J. C. See Chittock, R. S. Adams, D. J. See Othman, Y. H. S. Anderson, E. See Watson, D. Ayad, S. See Grant, M. E. Adams, R. L. P. See Yesufu, H. M. I. Anderson, N. G. See Kilgour, E. Ayling, C. See Moreland, B. H. Agathocleous, D. C. Andrews, S. C. Aynsley-Green, A. See Kozlowski, U. ; Cosstick, R.; Galpin, I. J.; McLen= ; Guest, J. R. M.; Turnbull, D. M. nan, A. G.; Page, P. C. B.; Prescott, Structural comparison of the guano^ M. sine 5'-phosphate reductase and Biological activity of (N*-N6)-bridged inosine 5'-phosphate dehydrogenase Bachar, O. See Michaelson, D. M. diadenosines. 756 of Escherichia coli. 858 Backwell, F. R. C. Agius, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Devon Radford
    Understanding the Encapsulins: Prediction and Characterization of Phage Capsid-like Nanocompartments in Prokaryotes by Devon Radford A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Molecular Genetics Department of Molecular Genetics Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto © Copyright by Devon Radford 2015 Understanding the Encapsulins: Prediction and Characterization of Phage Capsid-like Nanocompartments in Prokaryotes Devon Radford Doctorate of Philosophy in Molecular Genetics Department of Molecular Genetics Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto 2015 Abstract Encapsulins are a distinct family of prokaryotic compartments, comprised of an icosahedral shell encapsulating a variety of enzymes. The encapsulin shell protein is similar in sequence and structure to the capsid protein of dsDNA tailed bacteriophages. Although found across diverse phyla of Bacteria and Archaea, few encapsulins were previously characterized. My thesis work utilized a bioinformatic approach to identify and investigate the functions of all encapsulins found in bacteria and Archaea. I found 590 encapsulins showing definite sequence similarity to the previously described encapsulins, which I refer to as “classical encapsulins”. I identified four new enzyme families strongly predicted to be classical encapsulin cargo enzymes: ferredoxins, rubrerythrin-like, Dps-bacterioferritin-like, and hemerythrin-like proteins. While most species encode encapsulin cargo proteins adjacent to the encapsulin gene, I discovered 113 species encoding cargo proteins in genomic regions far removed from the encapsulin gene. I also found 118 genomes encoding two or three different enzymes strongly predicted to be targeted to the same encapsulin. Genes encoding three protein families, radical ii SAM oxidoreductases, CutA1-like proteins and metalloproteases, are highly enriched near encapsulin genes, but without targeting motifs for direct encapsulation.
    [Show full text]