The Tropical Rainforest Grades K-2 and 3-5 Through the Activities Provided, Children Are Introduced to the Components of the Rainforest
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Your Family's Guide to Explore NYC for FREE with Your Cool Culture Pass
coolculture.org FAMILY2019-2020 GUIDE Your family’s guide to explore NYC for FREE with your Cool Culture Pass. Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org WELCOME TO COOL CULTURE! Whether you are a returning family or brand new to Cool Culture, we welcome you to a new year of family fun, cultural exploration and creativity. As the Executive Director of Cool Culture, I am excited to have your family become a part of ours. Founded in 1999, Cool Culture is a non-profit organization with a mission to amplify the voices of families and strengthen the power of historically marginalized communities through engagement with art and culture, both within cultural institutions and beyond. To that end, we have partnered with your child’s school to give your family FREE admission to almost 90 New York City museums, historic societies, gardens and zoos. As your child’s first teacher and advocate, we hope you find this guide useful in adding to the joy, community, and culture that are part of your family traditions! Candice Anderson Executive Director Cool Culture 2020 Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org HOW TO USE YOUR COOL CULTURE FAMILY PASS You + 4 = FREE Extras Are Extra Up to 5 people, including you, will be The Family Pass covers general admission. granted free admission with a Cool Culture You may need to pay extra fees for special Family Pass to approximately 90 museums, exhibits and activities. Please call the $ $ zoos and historic sites. museum if you’re unsure. $ More than 5 people total? Be prepared to It’s For Families pay additional admission fees. -
Tropical Deciduous Forests and Savannas
2/1/17 Tropical Coastal Communities Relationships to other tropical forest systems — specialized swamp forests: Tropical Coastal Forests Mangrove and beach forests § confined to tropical and & subtropical zones at the interface Tropical Deciduous Forests of terrestrial and saltwater Mangrove Forests Mangrove Forests § confined to tropical and subtropical § stilt roots - support ocean tidal zones § water temperature must exceed 75° F or 24° C in warmest month § unique adaptations to harsh Queensland, Australia environment - convergent Rhizophora mangle - red mangrove Moluccas Venezuela 1 2/1/17 Mangrove Forests Mangrove Forests § stilt roots - support § stilt roots - support § pneumatophores - erect roots for § pneumatophores - erect roots for O2 exchange O2 exchange § salt glands - excretion § salt glands - excretion § viviparous seedlings Rhizophora mangle - red mangrove Rhizophora mangle - red mangrove Xylocarpus (Meliaceae) & Rhizophora Mangrove Forests Mangrove Forests § 80 species in 30 genera (20 § 80 species in 30 genera (20 families) families) § 60 species OW& 20 NW § 60 species OW& 20 NW (Rhizophoraceae - red mangrove - Avicennia - black mangrove; inner Avicennia nitida (black mangrove, most common in Neotropics) boundary of red mangrove, better Acanthaceae) drained Rhizophora mangle - red mangrove Xylocarpus (Meliaceae) & Rhizophora 2 2/1/17 Mangrove Forests § 80 species in 30 genera (20 families) § 60 species OW& 20 NW Four mangrove families in one Neotropical mangrove community Avicennia - Rhizophora - Acanthanceae Rhizophoraceae -
New York Pass Attractions
Free entry to the following attractions with the New York Pass Top attractions Big Bus New York Hop-On-Hop-Off Bus Tour Empire State Building Top of the Rock Observatory 9/11 Memorial & Museum Madame Tussauds New York Statue of Liberty – Ferry Ticket American Museum of Natural History 9/11 Tribute Center & Audio Tour Circle Line Sightseeing Cruises (Choose 1 of 5): Best of New York Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum Local New York Favourite National Geographic Encounter: Ocean Odyssey - NEW in 2019 The Downtown Experience: Virtual Reality Bus Tour Bryant Park - Ice Skating (General Admission) Luna Park at Coney Island - 24 Ride Wristband Deno's Wonder Wheel Harlem Gospel Tour (Sunday or Wednesday Service) Central Park TV & Movie Sites Walking Tour When Harry Met Seinfeld Bus Tour High Line-Chelsea-Meatpacking Tour The MET: Cloisters The Cathedral of St. John the Divine Brooklyn Botanic Garden Staten Island Yankees Game New York Botanical Garden Harlem Bike Rentals Staten Island Zoo Snug Harbor Botanical Garden in Staten Island The Color Factory - NEW in 2019 Surrey Rental on Governors Island DreamWorks Trolls The Experience - NEW in 2019 LEGOLAND® Discovery Center, Westchester New York City Museums Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) Metropolitan Museum of Art (The MET) The Met: Breuer Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum Whitney Museum of American Art Museum of Sex Museum of the City of New York New York Historical Society Museum Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum Museum of Arts and Design International Center of Photography Museum New Museum Museum of American Finance Fraunces Tavern South Street Seaport Museum Brooklyn Museum of Art MoMA PS1 New York Transit Museum El Museo del Barrio - NEW in 2019 Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust Museum of Chinese in America - NEW in 2019 Museum at Eldridge St. -
Neotropical Rainforest Restoration: Comparing Passive, Plantation and Nucleation Approaches
UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works Title Neotropical rainforest restoration: comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hf3v06s Journal BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 25(11) ISSN 0960-3115 Authors Bechara, Fernando C Dickens, Sara Jo Farrer, Emily C et al. Publication Date 2016-10-01 DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1186-7 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Biodivers Conserv DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1186-7 REVIEW PAPER Neotropical rainforest restoration: comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches 1,2 2 2 Fernando C. Bechara • Sara Jo Dickens • Emily C. Farrer • 2,3 2 2,4 Loralee Larios • Erica N. Spotswood • Pierre Mariotte • Katharine N. Suding2,5 Received: 17 April 2016 / Revised: 5 June 2016 / Accepted: 25 July 2016 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract Neotropical rainforests are global biodiversity hotspots and are challenging to restore. A core part of this challenge is the very long recovery trajectory of the system: recovery of structure can take 20–190 years, species composition 60–500 years, and reestablishment of rare/endemic species thousands of years. Passive recovery may be fraught with instances of arrested succession, disclimax or emergence of novel ecosystems. In these cases, active restoration methods are essential to speed recovery and set a desired restoration trajectory. Tree plantation is the most common active approach to reestablish a high density of native tree species and facilitate understory regeneration. While this approach may speed the successional trajectory, it may not achieve, and possibly inhibit, a long-term restoration trajectory towards the high species diversity characteristic of these forests. -
Forest--Savanna Transition Zones
Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Biogeosciences Discuss., 11, 4591–4636, 2014 Open Access www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/11/4591/2014/ Biogeosciences BGD doi:10.5194/bgd-11-4591-2014 Discussions © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 11, 4591–4636, 2014 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Forest–savanna Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG if available. transition zones Structural, physiognomic and E. M. Veenendaal et al. aboveground biomass variation in Title Page savanna-forest transition zones on three Abstract Introduction continents. How different are Conclusions References co-occurring savanna and forest Tables Figures formations? J I E. M. Veenendaal1, M. Torello-Raventos2, T. R. Feldpausch3, T. F. Domingues4, J I 5 3 2,25 3,6 7 8 F. Gerard , F. Schrodt , G. Saiz , C. A. Quesada , G. Djagbletey , A. Ford , Back Close J. Kemp9, B. S. Marimon10, B. H. Marimon-Junior10, E. Lenza10, J. A. Ratter11, L. Maracahipes10, D. Sasaki12, B. Sonké13, L. Zapfack13, D. Villarroel14, Full Screen / Esc M. Schwarz15, F. Yoko Ishida6,16, M. Gilpin3, G. B. Nardoto17, K. Affum-Baffoe18, L. Arroyo14, K. Bloomfield3, G. Ceca1, H. Compaore19, K. Davies2, A. Diallo20, Printer-friendly Version N. M. Fyllas3, J. Gignoux21, F. Hien20, M. Johnson3, E. Mougin22, P. Hiernaux22, Interactive Discussion T. Killeen14,23, D. Metcalfe8, H. S. Miranda17, M. Steininger24, K. Sykora1, M. I. Bird2, J. Grace4, S. Lewis3,26, O. L. Phillips3, and J. Lloyd16,27 4591 -
Reading the Landscape: Citywide Social Assessment of New York City Parks and Natural Areas in 2013-2014
Reading the Landscape: Citywide Social Assessment of New York City Parks and Natural Areas in 2013-2014 Social Assessment White Paper No. 2 March 2016 Prepared by: D. S. Novem Auyeung Lindsay K. Campbell Michelle L. Johnson Nancy F. Sonti Erika S. Svendsen Table of Contents Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 8 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Data Collection .................................................................................................................................... 12 Data Analysis........................................................................................................................................ 15 Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Park Profiles ........................................................................................................................................ -
Additional Member Benefits Reciprocity
Additional Member Benefits Columbus Member Advantage Offer Ends: December 31, 2016 unless otherwise noted As a Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Member, you can now enjoy you can now enjoy Buy One, Get One Free admission to select Columbus museums and attractions through the Columbus Member Advantage program. No coupon is necessary. Simply show your valid Columbus Zoo Membership card each time you visit! Columbus Member Advantage partners for 2016 include: Columbus Museum of Art COSI Franklin Park Conservatory and Botanical Gardens (Valid August 1 - October 31, 2016) King Arts Complex Ohio History Center & Ohio Village Wexner Center for the Arts Important Terms & Restrictions: Receive up to two free general admissions of equal or lesser value per visit when purchasing two regular-priced general admission tickets. Tickets must be purchased from the admissions area of the facility you are visiting. Cannot be combined with other discounts or offers. Not valid on prior purchases. No rain checks or refunds. Some restrictions may apply. Offer expires December 31, 2016 unless otherwise noted. Nationwide Insurance As a Zoo member, you can save on your auto insurance with a special member-only discount from Nationwide. Find out how much you can save today by clicking here. Reciprocity Columbus Zoo Members Columbus Zoo members receive discounted admission to the AZA accredited Zoos in the list below. Columbus Zoo members must present their current membership card along with a photo ID for each adult listed on the membership to receive their discount. Each zoo maintains their own discount policies, and the Columbus Zoo strongly recommends calling ahead before visiting a reciprocal zoo. -
Changes in Global Terrestrial Live Biomass Over the 21St Century
advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/7/27/eabe9829/DC1 Supplementary Materials for Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century Liang Xu, Sassan S. Saatchi*, Yan Yang, Yifan Yu, Julia Pongratz, A. Anthony Bloom, Kevin Bowman, John Worden, Junjie Liu, Yi Yin, Grant Domke, Ronald E. McRoberts, Christopher Woodall, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Sergio de-Miguel, Michael Keller, Nancy Harris, Sean Maxwell, David Schimel *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Published 2 July 2021, Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9829 (2021) DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe9829 This PDF file includes: Figs. S1 to S10 Tables S1 to S7 Supplementary Materials Supplementary Figures & Tables Fig. S1. Flow chart of procedures estimating global live biomass carbon stocks. It includes the organizations of input data forming training samples for regional and spatio-temporal models, spatially continuous annual remote sensing data sets as predictor layers, the models used, and the final output products at 10km resolution. Fig. S2. Ecoregion maps used in this study. (A) Regional land cover types by separating the biomes based on continents; (B) Combined land cover types aggregated to a total of 5 vegetation classes globally. Maps were derived from the MODIS IGBP (International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme) land cover product. We selected the data in 2001 as the base map for the inclusion of forest clearing and fire events in their original classes. Detailed description of each class can be found in Table S1. Fig. S3. Regional carbon stock series from 2000 to 2019. The land cover classes were derived from MODIS LC product (Fig. S2) and divided continentally to show regional effects. -
LESSON 9 NAME______Read the Passage Below from Chapter 12 of Nicky Fifth’S New Jersey
PASSAGE LESSON 9 NAME_______________________ Read the passage below from chapter 12 of Nicky Fifth’s New Jersey. On a separate sheet, explain why North Jersey is more populated than South Jersey. Use details from the text to support you answer. After driving for some time, we arrived at the Staten Island Ferry. My sisters had to go to the bathroom, so my mom brought them into the terminal. My dad looked so confused. “Hey,” my mom said as she returned to the van. “I was talking to a woman inside and she asked the girls if we were going on the ferry. When I told her we were lost, I mean on our way to the Liberty Science Center, she suggested we take the kids on a ferry ride, first.” “Why would we park here and take a ferry?” my dad asked slowly and quietly, like a volcano before the eruption. “Because it’s not just for commuters, it’s also a tourist attraction and gives riders great views of the city and the Statue of Liberty,” she said. “Can we go, Dad?” asked Timmy. “I really want to go on a ferry.” “We’re on our way to the science center,” my dad explained. “Plus, do you have any idea how much it would cost for seven people to ride a ferry round trip?” “I do,” my mom smiled. “It’s free.” “What?” my dad asked, looking even more confused. “It’s free and it’s a 30-minute ride to Manhattan and a 30-minute ride back,” she explained. -
Summary of Recommended Changes to the Executive Budget
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE EXECUTIVE BUDGET STATE FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 TABLE OF CONTENTS Financial Plan and Revenue ............................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Recommended Changes by Agency PUBLIC PROTECTION & GENERAL GOVERNMENT .................................................................. 1-1 EDUCATION, LABOR & FAMILY ASSISTANCE ........................................................................ 30-1 HEALTH & MENTAL HYGIENE ............................................................................................... 44-1 TRANSPORTATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ..... 53-1 DEBT SERVICE ....................................................................................................................... 69-1 FINANCIAL PLAN Financial Plan The SFY 2017-18 Enacted Budget projects General Fund spending to total $72.6 billion, which is an increase of $2.9 billion or 4.2 percent over SFY 2016-17. Total state spending including Special Revenue Funds and Capital Projects is projected at $111.2 billion for growth of $5.9 billion or 5.6 percent over last year. The Enacted All Funds Budget (which includes federal spending) is estimated to total $163.2 billion, for a growth of 4.5 percent. Absent extraordinary federal funds related to Super Storm Sandy and the Affordable Care Act, the All Funds Budget is projected to total $153.3 billion, an increase of 4.1 percent over last year. Reserves at the end of the fiscal year are -
State City Zoo Or Aquarium Reciprocity Contact Name Phone
Updated March 25th, 2021 State City Zoo or Aquarium Reciprocity Contact Name Phone # CANADA Calgary -Alberta Calgary Zoo 50% Katie Frost 403-232-9386 Granby - Quebe Granby Zoo 50% Mireille Forand 450-372-9113 x2103 Toronto Toronto Zoo 50% Membership Dept 416-392-9101 Winnipeg - ManiAssiniboine Park Zoo 50% Leah McDonald 204-927-6062 If the zoo or aquarium to which MEXICO León Parque Zoológico de León 50% David Rocha 52-477-210-2335 you belong has 50% in the Reciprocity column, you can Alabama Birmingham Birmingham Zoo 50% Patty Pendleton 205-879-0409 x232 expect to receive a 50% discount Alaska Seward Alaska SeaLife Center 50% Shannon Wolf 907-224-6355 on admission at all the zoos and Arizona Phoenix Phoenix Zoo 50% Membership Dept 602-914-4393 aquariums on this list (except, of course, those that are FREE TO Tempe SEA LIFE Arizona Aquarium 50% Membership Dept 877-526-3960 THE PUBLIC). Tucson Reid Park Zoo 50% Membership Dept 520-881-4753 ALWAYS CALL AHEAD* Arkansas Little Rock Little Rock Zoo 50% Kelli Enz 501-371-4589 If the zoo or aquarium to which California Atascadero Charles Paddock Zoo 100% & 50% Becky Maxwell 805-461-5080 x2105 you belong has 100% and 50% Eureka Sequoia Park Zoo 100% & 50% Kathleen Juliano 707-441-4263 in the Reciprocity column, you can expect to receive free Fresno Fresno Chaffee Zoo 50% Membership Office559-498-5921 admission to the zoos and Los Angeles Los Angeles Zoo 50% Membership Dept 323-644-4759 aquariums that also have 100% Oakland Oakland Zoo 50% Membership Dept 510-632-9525 x160 and 50% in the Reciprocity column and those that are FREE Palm Desert The Living Desert 50% Elisa Escobar 760-346-5694 x2111 TO THE PUBLIC; and a 50% Sacramento Sacramento Zoo 50% Membership Dept 916-808-5888 discount on admission to the San Francisco Aquarium of the Bay 50% Jaz Cariola 415-623-5310 zoos and aquariums that have 50% in the Reciprocity column. -
Classification and Description of World Formation Types
United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler-Wolf, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.