DOCSLIB.ORG

The Blitzkrieg Myth: How Hitler and the Allies Misread the Strategic Lessons of World War Ii Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Blitzkrieg Myth: How Hitler and the Allies Misread the Strategic Lessons of World War Ii Pdf, Epub, Ebook THE BLITZKRIEG MYTH: HOW HITLER AND THE ALLIES MISREAD THE STRATEGIC LESSONS OF WORLD WAR II PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Mosier | 320 pages | 01 Dec 2004 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780060009779 | English | New York, NY, United States The Blitzkrieg Myth: How Hitler and the Allies Misread the Strategic Lessons of World War II PDF Book By his own account, Churchill was indeed shocked, as he had every right to be. See details for description of any imperfections. Mosier, John. Select a website referencing style: Copy to Clipboard Copied! The Second World War was ultimately decided by attrition - the Germans lacked the manpower and resources to win, and were gradually worn down, and the land campaigns particularly in the East were fundamental to that process. Read an excerpt of this book! On page he quotes a wildly inflated and discredited number for the deaths at Dresden. It's an entertaining read and it if you are new to WW2 history it will make you want to investigate further like it did with me. Aug 21, Cheng Jun rated it really liked it. The author lumps both these theories under the catchall phrase "Breakthrough" and discusses how misunderstanding of them distorted planning. The second theory, advanced by Italian airman Giulio Douhet, was that strategic bombardment by aircraft could on their own cause so much damage that the enemy's will and ability to resist would collapse. Jun 20, Brian rated it really liked it Shelves: wwii. View Product. Dec 27, Steven Raszewski rated it it was amazing. In point of fact, Hitler was one of the few Germans who believed in the Breakthrough doctrine, and he attempted to use the strategy once he took over military affairs. The author only focuses on the western fronts; he has almost nothing to say about the war in Russia and almost no explanation for ignoring it. Dec 31, Jarrod Zhang rated it really liked it. Give it a try. Thankfully, he does acknowledge Montgomery's shortcomings, especially when it comes down to Operation Market Garden, the ill-advised plan to drop airborne troops in Holland to take a bunch of bridges and then have an armored spearhead drive up the road to meet them. The Germans made more use of radio and younger commanders like Manstein, Guderian and Rommel believed in leading from the front, using radio, and giving commanders more freedom to act sometimes much more than more senior German commanders liked. Additional Product Features Dewey Edition. The approach, taken in the book, and the material, we learnt about the Blitzkrieg Myth from other textbooks and lectures, differ considerably. Too many weak arguments and a main premise which seems to misrepresent the importance and roles of armor and bombers in WW2. John Mosier shows how Hitler, Rommel, von Manstein, Montgomery, and Patton were all equally seduced by the breakthrough myth, or blitzkrieg, as the decisive way to victory. In the first two examples he uses he does well to present his position, using Poland and the Low Countries to show that the Germans weren't really doing anything new and that the Poles and the Dutch actually gave a better accounting for themselves than is generally presented in books on the war. His views on France are in many ways less supportable, but the are still plausible. Jul 10, Darth Readius rated it it was amazing. The Blitzkrieg Myth: How Hitler and the Allies Misread the Strategic Lessons of World War II Writer This is a good read for students of WWII and armchair tacticians, especially those who enjoy wandering off in Google searches. A large part of the Allied victory was the strategic bombing of German cities that severely disrupted German industry, especially munitions. Refresh and try again. From the corridors of power inWashington to the frontlines of the waron terror, Dale Brown Allied generals who tried the strategy inevitably found that the Germans were able to quickly shift defenses to halt the attacks. How to His position on the Poles has been being presented more and more often in recent times, giving a great deal of credence to his views. The approach, taken in the book, and the material, we learnt about the Blitzkrieg Myth from other textbooks and lectures, differ considerably. Well researched, and well written. In his. As a result The Germans could react to the tactical situation much faster than their French counterparts, who often received orders that were inappropriate to a changed situation. But I don't fully understand his interpretation of operation Market Garden. It is unclear exactly how influential these two theorists were. What about the big picture? But he gets two major things right. He says the Sherman was under gunned and under armored, generally true compared to the later German tanks. But this is the vital point the historian Churchill understood only too well: An army can indeed recover from a rout or a breakthrough -- if there is a reserve to plug the gap. He could have presented his points, and then addressed refutes immediately so the reader has things fresh in his mind. It will give some insight in further reading. I found the contents fascinaing but the delivery stilted. The Blitzkrieg Myth: How Hitler and the Allies Misread the Strategic Lessons of World War II Reviews Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. On page he quotes a wildly inflated and discredited number for the deaths at Dresden. His views on France are in many ways less supportable, but the are still plausible. Mosier attributes the German success primarily to a loss of nerve by the French and British high command and politicians. Will the collapse of international cooperation push France, Turkey, Japan, and Saudi Arabia to the top of international concerns? Rather than the Maginot Line being a uniquely French expensive exercise in futility, the use of extensive fortifications was also adopted by the Germans in the west Siegfried Line - which unlike the Maginot line ran from the full length of Germany's border and the east. Dec 09, Andrew rated it it was amazing Shelves: ww2-books. But to enact this type of warfare you needed to disperse the decision making which empowers officers at all levels to make decisions. In his. Douhet does not appear to have been studied in the the UK, the only country that attempted to build a strategic bombing force before the war. Allied generals who tried the strategy inevitably found that the Germans were able to quickly shift defenses to halt the attacks. It will give some insight in further reading. Everyone with an interest in World War II or modern military doctrine and theory should read this book. His skills in editing and writing also promise that this book is written in clear and comprehensible English. According to Churchill, Gamelin replied "Aucune", there is none. Mosier quotes sources that say that every German soldier was equal to about 1. Mosie Conventional history holds, according to Mosier, that the Battle of France was won by new blitzkrieg lightning war tactics used by the Germans, leveraging their superior armoured forces and air forces against French forces sheltering behind the expensive and ineffectual Maginot Line. He has the distinct advantage of not being a partisan of any of the big names in World War II, and so offers probably as close to a fair assessment of Rommel, Bradley, Montgomery, etc. It is something that comes up fairly often in German accounts and some of the Russian ones that are available. The T glacis was sloped at a better angle, and it had thicker side armor, also sloped. Overview A bold reinterpretation of some of the most decisive battles of World War II, showing that the outcomes had less to do with popular new technology than old—fashioned, on—the—ground warfare. Readers also enjoyed. Mosier shows that, despite what we have been told, Germany did not have a clear superiority in tanks at the beginning of the war, and that the Germans did not subscribe to the "Blitzkrieg" strategy to invade Poland and France. On the contrary it would be more accurate to say that truth is the first casualty of the theories of war. See all 2 pre-owned listings. The lack of reserves were critical. Totally recommend though! I think Mosier could have greatly enhanced his arguments by being honest with the facts and acknowledging the challenges to his opinions. Check the price of your paper. Mosier omits to mention that he came to Paris on the 16th to hear the facts from Gamelin himself. Jul 23, Dj rated it liked it. By doing so, he obscures the fact that the German position was untenable even before their failed counter-attack at Avranches, which he blames for the German defeat. The Blitzkrieg Myth: How Hitler and the Allies Misread the Strategic Lessons of World War II Read Online Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. The book is heavy on heroes and villains, particularly on unconventional ones. Error rating book. A almost exact replay of what happened during the Battle of the Bulge. Fuller's was noted for his acerbic criticism of his peers and superiors, and his support for the the British fascists prior to the war made him highly suspect. Mosier repeats this approach in his chapter on the Battle of Normandy, where he dismisses the American breakthrough at Avranches because it went "backward", i. He had the victory within his grasp would he have managed to tame his demons. Most countries and companies are not prepared for It is something that comes up fairly often in German accounts and some of the Russian ones that are available.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance Rising: Fighting the Shadow War Against the Germans
    Activity: Resistance Rising: Fighting the Shadow War against the Germans Guiding question: What, if any, impact did the French Resistance have on the Allied invasion of France? DEVELOPED BY MATTHEW POTH Grade Level(s): 6-8, 9-12 Subject(s): Social Studies, English/Language Arts, Journalism Cemetery Connection: Rhone American Cemetery Fallen Hero Connection: Sergeant Charles R. Perry Activity: Resistance Rising: Fighting the Shadow War against the Germans 1 Overview Using primary and secondary sources and interactive maps from the American Battle Monuments Commission, stu- dents will learn about the impact of the French Resistance “Often, civilians and on the battle for France and the overall outcome of the war. members of the military in Students will critically analyze documents to learn about the non-traditional roles are overlooked when teaching ways in which the Resistance operated. Students will create World War II. To more fully a newspaper to inform the public and recruit potential mem- understand the impact and bers to the movement. scale of the war, students must hear the stories of these men and women.” Historical Context — Matthew Poth The French Resistance was a collection of French citizens who united against the German occupation. In addition to the Poth is a teacher at Park View High School German military, which controlled northern France, many in Sterling, Virginia. French people objected to the Vichy government, the govern- ment of southern France led by World War I General Marshal Philippe Pétain. The Resistance played a vital role in the Allied advancement through France. With the aid of the men and women of the Resistance, the Allies gathered accurate intelligence on the Atlantic Wall, the deployment of German troops, and the capabilities of their enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Co-Operation Command and Tactical Air Power Development in Britain, 1940-1943: the Role of Army Co-Operation Command in Army Air Support
    ARMY CO-OPERATION COMMAND AND TACTICAL AIR POWER DEVELOPMENT IN BRITAIN, 1940-1943: THE ROLE OF ARMY CO-OPERATION COMMAND IN ARMY AIR SUPPORT By MATTHEW LEE POWELL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham September 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the impact of the developments made during the First World War and the inter-war period in tactical air support. Further to this, it will analyse how these developments led to the creation of Army Co-operation Command and affected the role it played developing army air support in Britain. Army Co-operation Command has been neglected in the literature on the Royal Air Force during the Second World War and this thesis addresses this neglect by adding to the extant knowledge on the development of tactical air support and fills a larger gap that exists in the literature on Royal Air Force Commands. Army Co-operation Command was created at the behest of the army in the wake of the Battle of France.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quandary of Allied Logistics from D-Day to the Rhine
    THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE By Parker Andrew Roberson November, 2018 Director: Dr. Wade G. Dudley Program in American History, Department of History This thesis analyzes the Allied campaign in Europe from the D-Day landings to the crossing of the Rhine to argue that, had American and British forces given the port of Antwerp priority over Operation Market Garden, the war may have ended sooner. This study analyzes the logistical system and the strategic decisions of the Allied forces in order to explore the possibility of a shortened European campaign. Three overall ideas are covered: logistics and the broad-front strategy, the importance of ports to military campaigns, and the consequences of the decisions of the Allied commanders at Antwerp. The analysis of these points will enforce the theory that, had Antwerp been given priority, the war in Europe may have ended sooner. THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History By Parker Andrew Roberson November, 2018 © Parker Roberson, 2018 THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE By Parker Andrew Roberson APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: Dr. Wade G. Dudley, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Gerald J. Prokopowicz, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Michael T. Bennett, Ph.D. CHAIR OF THE DEP ARTMENT OF HISTORY: Dr. Christopher Oakley, Ph.D. DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL: Dr. Paul J.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Market Garden WWII
    Operation Market Garden WWII Operation Market Garden (17–25 September 1944) was an Allied military operation, fought in the Netherlands and Germany in the Second World War. It was the largest airborne operation up to that time. The operation plan's strategic context required the seizure of bridges across the Maas (Meuse River) and two arms of the Rhine (the Waal and the Lower Rhine) as well as several smaller canals and tributaries. Crossing the Lower Rhine would allow the Allies to outflank the Siegfried Line and encircle the Ruhr, Germany's industrial heartland. It made large-scale use of airborne forces, whose tactical objectives were to secure a series of bridges over the main rivers of the German- occupied Netherlands and allow a rapid advance by armored units into Northern Germany. Initially, the operation was marginally successful and several bridges between Eindhoven and Nijmegen were captured. However, Gen. Horrocks XXX Corps ground force's advance was delayed by the demolition of a bridge over the Wilhelmina Canal, as well as an extremely overstretched supply line, at Son, delaying the capture of the main road bridge over the Meuse until 20 September. At Arnhem, the British 1st Airborne Division encountered far stronger resistance than anticipated. In the ensuing battle, only a small force managed to hold one end of the Arnhem road bridge and after the ground forces failed to relieve them, they were overrun on 21 September. The rest of the division, trapped in a small pocket west of the bridge, had to be evacuated on 25 September. The Allies had failed to cross the Rhine in sufficient force and the river remained a barrier to their advance until the offensives at Remagen, Oppenheim, Rees and Wesel in March 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO's WHO in the WAR in EUROPE the War in Europe 7 CHARLES DE GAULLE
    who’s Who in the War in Europe (National Archives and Records Administration, 342-FH-3A-20068.) POLITICAL LEADERS Allies FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT When World War II began, many Americans strongly opposed involvement in foreign conflicts. President Roosevelt maintained official USneutrality but supported measures like the Lend-Lease Act, which provided invaluable aid to countries battling Axis aggression. After Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration of war on the United States, Roosevelt rallied the country to fight the Axis powers as part of the Grand Alliance with Great Britain and the Soviet Union. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-128765.) WINSTON CHURCHILL In the 1930s, Churchill fiercely opposed Westernappeasement of Nazi Germany. He became prime minister in May 1940 following a German blitzkrieg (lightning war) against Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France. He then played a pivotal role in building a global alliance to stop the German juggernaut. One of the greatest orators of the century, Churchill raised the spirits of his countrymen through the war’s darkest days as Germany threatened to invade Great Britain and unleashed a devastating nighttime bombing program on London and other major cities. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USW33-019093-C.) JOSEPH STALIN Stalin rose through the ranks of the Communist Party to emerge as the absolute ruler of the Soviet Union. In the 1930s, he conducted a reign of terror against his political opponents, including much of the country’s top military leadership. His purge of Red Army generals suspected of being disloyal to him left his country desperately unprepared when Germany invaded in June 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Britain: Mankind's Finest Hour
    THETHE BATTLEBATTLE OFOF BRITAIN:BRITAIN: MANKINDMANKIND’’SS FINESTFINEST HOURHOUR 1 WEEKWEEK ONE:ONE: 19181918--19401940 FROMFROM ARMISTICEARMISTICE TOTO THETHE BATTLEBATTLE OFOF FRANCEFRANCE THETHE WARWAR TOTO ENDEND ALLALL WARSWARS FROMFROM VICTORYVICTORY TOTO DEPRESSIONDEPRESSION DEMOBILIZATION FOLLOWS END OF WAR STOCK MARKETS COLLAPSE IN 1929 WORLD ECONOMIES IN TATTERS MASSIVE UNEMPLOYMENT GUNS VERSUS BUTTER WIDESPREADWIDESPREAD OPPOSITIONOPPOSITION TOTO ANOTHERANOTHER WARWAR MASSIVE WORLD WAR I CASUALTIES “THE BOMBER WILL ALWAYS GET THROUGH” CIVILIANS WIDELY SEEN AS VULNERABLE MINUTES TO OVERFLY ENGLISH CHANNEL FEAR OF GLOBAL CATASTROPHE THRTHREEEE MAJORMAJOR EUROPEANEUROPEAN POWERSPOWERS DOMINATEDOMINATE THETHE CONTINENTCONTINENT FRANCE – GERMANY – BRITAIN OPPOSING SECURITY SCHEMES DISARMAMENT PACTS POPULAR BRITAINBRITAIN RULESRULES THETHE WAVESWAVES 300 YEARS OF DOMINANT SEAPOWER NO INVASION SINCE 1066 ENGLAND PROTECTED BY THE CHANNEL ARMY DEPLOYED ACROSS THE EMPIRE FRENCHFRENCH BUILDBUILD MAGINOTMAGINOT LINELINE FROM SWITZERLAND TO BELGIUM KEEP THE HUNS OUT! VULNERABLE TO FLANKING PERFECT FOR THE LAST WAR GERMANSGERMANS REARMREARM BYBY STEALTHSTEALTH STEEL INDUSTRY EXPANDS CAPACITY PANZER CORPS FORMED LUFTWAFFE SECRETLY ESTABLISHED NAVY EXPANDS – BUT NOT ENOUGH 19361936--19391939 THETHE SPANISHSPANISH CIVILCIVIL WARWAR BERLIN SUPPORTS FRANCO’S FASCISTS NAZIS DEVELOP AIR-GROUND TACTICS LUFTWAFFE GAINS COMBAT EXPERIENCE USE OF TERROR BOMBING OF CIVILIANS GERMANYGERMANY ANNEXESANNEXES TERRITORYTERRITORY
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline June 1940
    TIMELINE—JUNE 1940 This month is mainly about the fall of France, and the continued evacuation of Allied troops not just from Dunkirk but other north western ports. It also sees Italy enter the war, albeit ill-prepared to do so. It ends as the Battle of Britain begins. On 1st June, as Operation Dynamo continued, a further 64,429 Allied troops were evacuated from Dunkirk. The following day Hitler set foot on French territory for the first time, visiting the Canadian National War Memorial at Vimy Ridge near Arras. It had been rumoured, and widely reported, that the Germans had destroyed the memorial, and it is thought that Hitler chose to visit the site to prove otherwise. It is also suggested that he particularly admired the memorial because it is a monument to peace, not a celebration of war. Make of that what you will! Whatever, he ensured that the monument was protected throughout the war. On 3rd June the last British troops were evacuated from Dunkirk, and overnight over 26,000 French troops. At 10.20am on 4th June the Germans occupied the city and captured the 40,000 French troops who were left. Dunkirk was reduced to rubble. Overall Operation Dynamo had rescued 338,226 men – two thirds of them British – from the beaches of Dunkirk, although 243 vessels and 106 aircraft had been destroyed in the process. Lord Gort, the Commander of the BEF, was also evacuated, leaving Lt General Harold Alexander in command of the remaining troops Among those still in France was Private Herbert Mutton.
    [Show full text]
  • With Wings Like Eagles: a History of the Battle of Britain1
    With Wings Like Eagles: A History of the Battle of Britain1 Robert R. Watkins2 and Shauna M. Watkins3 In With Wings Like Eagles: A History of the Battle of Britain, Michael Korda provides a historical, political, and sociological context for World War II's “Battle of Britain,” a term coined by Winston Churchill to describe the impending conflict between Great Britain and Germany after the defeat of France in the early years of World War II (“the War”).4 The Battle took place in the summer and autumn of 1940 between the German Luftwaffe Air Force (“German Luftwaffe”) and the British Royal Air Force (“RAF”).5 Korda simultaneously balances the objectivity of academic writing with the warmth of grandfatherly storytelling. He begins by reminding us of the “‘dashing’ young men on both sides” who participated in the Battle of Britain.6 He acknowledges the appeal of the archetypal fighter pilot, but, at the same time, he dispels the mythological underpinnings of the War.7 Indeed, by the end of the book, he bluntly laments that “much of the pain and bitterness of the Battle of Britain was eventually suppressed in favor of a more glamorous picture.”8 1 Michael Korda, With Wings liKe eagles: a history of the Battle of Britain (2009). 2 Robert R. Watkins is a General Attorney with the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. 3 Shauna M. Watkins is an Associate Counsel with the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. 4 Korda, supra note 1, at 1-2 (quoting Winston Churchill’s June 18, 1940 speech in the House of Commons: “What General Weygand called the Battle of France is over.
    [Show full text]
  • Overlord - 1944
    Overlord - 1944 Bracknell Paper No 5 A Symposium on the Normandy Landings 25 March 1994 Sponsored jointly by the Royal Air Force Historical Society and the Royal Air Force Staff College, Bracknell ii OVERLORD – 1944 Copyright ©1995 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society First Published in the UK in 1995 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 0 9519824 3 5 Typesetting and origination by Alan Sutton Publishing Ltd Printed in Great Britain by Hartnolls, Bodmin, Cornwall. Royal Air Force Historical Society OVERLORD – 1944 iii Contents Frontispiece Preface 1. Welcome by the Commandant, Air Vice-Marshal M P Donaldson 2. Introductory Remarks by the Chairman, Air Chief Marshal Sir Michael Armitage 3. Overlord – The Broad Context: John Terraine 4. The Higher Command Structures and Commanders: Field Marshal the Lord Bramall 5. Air Preparations: Air Marshal Sir Denis Crowley-Milling 6. Planning the Operation: Lt General Sir Napier Crookenden and Air Marshal Sir Denis Crowley-Milling 7. The Luftwaffe Role – Situation and Response: Dr Horst Boog 8. The Overlord Campaign: Lt General Crookenden and Air Marshal Crowley-Milling 9. Digest of the Group Discussions 10. Chairman’s Closing Remarks 11. Biographical Notes on Main Speakers The Royal Air Force Historical Society iv OVERLORD – 1944 OVERLORD – 1944 v Preface The fifth in the World War Two series of Bracknell Symposia, Overlord – 1944, was held at the RAF Staff College on March 25th.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii Veteran’S Committee, Washington, Dc Under a Generous Grant from the Dodge Jones Foundation 2
    W WORLD WWAR IIII A TEACHING LESSON PLAN AND TOOL DESIGNED TO PRESERVE AND DOCUMENT THE WORLD’S GREATEST CONFLICT PREPARED BY THE WORLD WAR II VETERAN’S COMMITTEE, WASHINGTON, DC UNDER A GENEROUS GRANT FROM THE DODGE JONES FOUNDATION 2 INDEX Preface Organization of the World War II Veterans Committee . Tab 1 Educational Standards . Tab 2 National Council for History Standards State of Virginia Standards of Learning Primary Sources Overview . Tab 3 Background Background to European History . Tab 4 Instructors Overview . Tab 5 Pre – 1939 The War 1939 – 1945 Post War 1945 Chronology of World War II . Tab 6 Lesson Plans (Core Curriculum) Lesson Plan Day One: Prior to 1939 . Tab 7 Lesson Plan Day Two: 1939 – 1940 . Tab 8 Lesson Plan Day Three: 1941 – 1942 . Tab 9 Lesson Plan Day Four: 1943 – 1944 . Tab 10 Lesson Plan Day Five: 1944 – 1945 . Tab 11 Lesson Plan Day Six: 1945 . Tab 11.5 Lesson Plan Day Seven: 1945 – Post War . Tab 12 3 (Supplemental Curriculum/American Participation) Supplemental Plan Day One: American Leadership . Tab 13 Supplemental Plan Day Two: American Battlefields . Tab 14 Supplemental Plan Day Three: Unique Experiences . Tab 15 Appendixes A. Suggested Reading List . Tab 16 B. Suggested Video/DVD Sources . Tab 17 C. Suggested Internet Web Sites . Tab 18 D. Original and Primary Source Documents . Tab 19 for Supplemental Instruction United States British German E. Veterans Organizations . Tab 20 F. Military Museums in the United States . Tab 21 G. Glossary of Terms . Tab 22 H. Glossary of Code Names . Tab 23 I. World War II Veterans Questionnaire .
    [Show full text]
  • OPERATION MARKET- GARDEN 1944 (1) the American Airborne Missions
    OPERATION MARKET- GARDEN 1944 (1) The American Airborne Missions STEVEN J. ZALOGA ILLUSTRATED BY STEVE NOON © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CAMPAIGN 270 OPERATION MARKET- GARDEN 1944 (1) The American Airborne Missions STEVEN J ZALOGA ILLUSTRATED BY STEVE NOON Series editor Marcus Cowper © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 The strategic setting CHRONOLOGY 8 OPPOSING COMMANDERS 9 German commandersAllied commanders OPPOSING FORCES 14 German forcesAllied forces OPPOSING PLANS 24 German plansAllied plans THE CAMPAIGN 32 The southern sector: 101st Airborne Division landingOperation Garden: XXX Corps The Nijmegen sector: 82nd Airborne DivisionGerman reactionsNijmegen Bridge: the first attemptThe demolition of the Nijmegen bridgesGroesbeek attack by Korps FeldtCutting Hell’s HighwayReinforcing the Nijmegen Bridge defenses: September 18Battle for the Nijmegen bridges: September 19Battle for the Nijmegen Railroad Bridge: September 20Battle for the Nijmegen Highway Bridge: September 20Defending the Groesbeek Perimeter: September 20 On to Arnhem?Black Friday: cutting Hell’s HighwayGerman re-assessmentRelieving the 1st Airborne DivisionHitler’s counteroffensive: September 28–October 2 AFTERMATH 87 THE BATTLEFIELD TODAY 91 FURTHER READING 92 INDEX 95 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com The Void: pursuit to the German frontier, August 26 to September 11, 1944 26toSeptember11, August pursuittotheGermanfrontier, Void: The Allied front line, date indicated Armed Forces Nijmegen Netherlands Wesel N German front line, evening XXXX enth Ar ifte my First Fsch September 11, 1944 F XXXX XXX Westwall LXVII 1. Fsch XXX XXXX LXXXVIII 0 50 miles XXX 15 LXXXIX XXX Turnhout 0 50km LXXXVI Dusseldorf Ostend Brugge Antwerp Dunkirk XXX XXX Calais II Ghent XII XXX Cdn Br XXX Cologne GERMANY Br Maastricht First Fsch Brussels XXXX Seventh Bonn Boulognes BELGIUM XXX XXXX 21 Aachen LXXXI 7 XXXX First XXXXX Lille 12 September 4 Liège Cdn XIX XXX XXX XXX North Sea XXXX VII Namur VII LXXIV Second US B Koblenz Br St.
    [Show full text]