Investigating the Geography of Rape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating the Geography of Rape To Peter - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ................................................................................................ 4 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS ..................................................................................................... 6 2. THEORIES OF POWER, SPACE AND RAPE ..................................................................... 7 2.1 POWER AND SPACE ................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 RAPE AND NATIONALISM ....................................................................................................... 11 2.3 SOCIOBIOLOGICAL THEORIES OF RAPE ................................................................................ 13 2.3.1 EVOLUTIONARY THEORY ...................................................................................................... 14 2.3.2 HORMONES ........................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.3 MODERN SYNTHESIS THEORY ............................................................................................... 17 2.4 FEMINIST THEORIES OF RAPE ................................................................................................ 19 2.4.1 SECOND WAVE FEMINISM ..................................................................................................... 20 2.4.2 BLACK FEMINISM .................................................................................................................. 23 2.4.3 NEOLIBERAL FEMINISM ........................................................................................................ 27 2.5 MASCULINITY STUDIES .......................................................................................................... 30 2.6 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 36 3. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 38 3.1 ENGAGING WITH CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS AND IDEOLOGY .................................... 38 3.1.1 DISCOURSE AS TEXT ............................................................................................................. 41 3.1.2 DISCURSIVE PRACTICE .......................................................................................................... 44 3.1.3 DISCOURSE AS SOCIAL PRACTICE ......................................................................................... 44 3.2 PREVIOUS RESEARCH ............................................................................................................. 44 3.3 FIELDWORK ............................................................................................................................ 46 3.4 POSITIONALITY ....................................................................................................................... 48 3.5 RESEARCH STRATEGY ............................................................................................................ 51 3.6 THE CREDIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DATA OBTAINED ................................................. 52 4. THE GEOGRAPHY OF RAPE: SPACES OF SHAME AND RISK ................................. 56 4.1 ENGAGING WITH THE FIELD .................................................................................................. 56 4.2 THE CASE ................................................................................................................................ 60 4.3 ANALYZING TEXTUAL PRACTICE .......................................................................................... 63 4.3.1 TEMPORAL DISCURSIVE CHANGE .......................................................................................... 65 4.3.2 RAPE BETWEEN BIOPOLITICS AND NATIONALISM ................................................................. 72 4.3.3 DISCURSIVE BATTLES ........................................................................................................... 84 4.4 ANALYZING DISCURSIVE PRACTICE ...................................................................................... 91 4.4.1 HEGEMONIC DISCOURSES ..................................................................................................... 92 - 2 - 4.5 ANALYZING SOCIAL PRACTICE ............................................................................................. 97 4.5.1 HABITS OF THE NEWS ROOM ................................................................................................. 98 4.5.2 NATIONALISM AND IDEOLOGY ........................................................................................... 101 4.5.3 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 110 5. RAPE AND FEMINISM REVISED .................................................................................... 112 5.1 THE HAPPY MARRIAGE BETWEEN FEMINISM AND POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY .................... 112 5.2 UNCHASTE WOMEN VERSUS “NICE GUYS” .......................................................................... 113 5.3 TOWARDS SPACES OF AUTONOMY ....................................................................................... 115 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................... 118 APPENDIX 1 ............................................................................................................................. 125 APPENDIX 2 ............................................................................................................................. 128 APPENDIX 3 ............................................................................................................................. 129 APPENDIX 4 ............................................................................................................................. 130 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The thesis examines discourses about rape in American media. The author has selected a case from 2006 in which three White men from the lacrosse team at Duke University, North Carolina, were falsely accused of raping a Black woman at a party. The research question is as follows: ‖What discourses can be traced in media coverage of the Duke lacrosse ―rape‖ case, and what power effects can be derived from these representations?‖ The author gives an overview on contemporary theories about rape and positions research on rape within political geography. The archive covers 94 articles from New York Times, USA Today and News & Observer. The author examines which explanatory models that are prevalent in the data, and how notions of gender, race and nationalism are produced and reproduced in the media debate. A five-fold discourse typology, consisting of conservative, liberal, neoliberal, feminist and bio-geopolitical discourses, is outlined, followed by an analysis of how particular hegemonic discourses displace alternative ways of understanding rape. The coding of data suggests that feminist discourses are marginal. Conservative discourses often correspond with explanation models offered by sociobiology where rape is understood as an outcome of natural male aggression and moral decay. Liberal discourses problematize how the police and the legal system handle justice. Neoliberal discourses stress individual risk management more than the effectiveness of the legal system. Bio-geopolitical discourses intersect with other discourses, and produce ―spaces of shame‖ and ―spaces of risk‖ where places like Durham and Duke University are discursively constructed in relation to national values about sexual purity and human rights. The geography of rape is mediated and negotiated through technologies of political and sexual exceptionalism on multiple geographical scales where, as the case turned out, it became illegitimate to raise concerns about race, class and gender inequality. The power effects include a depolitization and individualization of rape at home, and a justification of political and military intervention in the name of gender equality and human rights abroad. 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Elin Sæther – for your enthusiasm and optimism on behalf of the project. For having ice in your stomach when my confusion sent me off track. Your positivism has been extremely encouraging. Øystein Gullvåg Holter – for your critical attitude to wishy-washy post-structuralism, your thoughtful comments and for dedicating much more time to this project than what could reasonably be expected. Paola Bacchetta – I have taken shamelessly advantage of our many class discussions and your generous comments. You taught me that a feminist geographer always must look into herself and the double standards of the system she is part of, before pointing fingers at Others. You made my stay at UC Berkeley a memorable one. Barrie Thorne – for your thrilling laughter, good sense of humor and for having created an enabling learning environment. You and my co-students gave me the best foundation possible for understanding the American society and improved the theory chapter significantly. Julie Michelle Klinger – for being my geographer in crime at UC Berkeley and your bright comments at the final stages
Recommended publications
  • Pr-Sum-11.Pdf
    Exam Memo, Professional Responsibility Professor Griffin, Summer 2011 I awarded grades according to the law school’s grading curve, which requires a class average between 2.9 and 3.1. The average for this class was 3.10. The curve was as follows, based on a total possible 100 points. The number in parentheses indicates the number of students who received that letter grade. 93 A (2) 86-88 A- (4) 80-85 B+ (19) 70-79 B (36) 65-68 B- (6) 60-63 C+ (3) You are welcome to pick up your exams and answers at the front desk of the Health Law & Policy Institute. You will need to know your exam number in order to get the exam. You must sign out your exam and you do not need to return it. Please read over this memo and your exam before asking me any questions about your grade. For Question I, it was important to read the question and both 1) identify what Norris should do now and 2) assess Keany and Peppers. If you just skipped Norris you missed a lot of points. A key part of your analysis of Norris should have involved the Bevill test, CB 517, 522, applied in the Grand Jury Subpoena case (Roe and Moe), CB 513. This was Norris’ chance to try to get back the documents that had been turned over to the S.E.C. Whenever you learn a multi-factor test, however, you must apply it to the facts in the question. The immigration and F.T.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Paul Giannelli* the Need for Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases Is Critical
    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 2009 Scientific videnceE and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Paul C. Giannelli Case Western University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Evidence Commons, and the Litigation Commons Repository Citation Giannelli, Paul C., "Scientific videnceE and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case" (2009). Faculty Publications. 95. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/95 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Forensic Science: Scientific Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Paul Giannelli* The need for pretrial discovery in criminal cases is critical. 1 An advisory note to the federal discovery rule states: "[l]t is difficult to test expert testimony at trial without advance notice and preparation." 2 A defendant's right to confrontation, effective assistance of counsel, and due process often turns on pretrial disclosure. This essay discusses a case that demonstrates this point. What came to be known as the "Duke Lacrosse Case" began with a student party and a false accusation of rape. 3 On March 14, 2006, Crystal Mangum claimed that she had been sexually assaulted at the party. As is common in rape cases, a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) used what is known as a "rape kit" to collect evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortis SE-S2642ACD.MAG
    STATE OF NORTH CAROL OF THE WAKE COUNTY CAROLINA STATE BA Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT, v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF DISCIPLINE MICHAEL B. NIFONG, Attorney, Defendant. The Hearing Committee on its own motion pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) enters the following Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of Discipline in order to correct a factual mistake in Findings of Fact Paragraph 43 of its original Order in this cause, and to add an additional Conclusion of Law (b): A hearing in this matter was conducted on June 12 through June 16, 2007, before a Hearing Committee composed of F. Lane Williamson, Chair, and members Sharon B. Alexander and R. Mitchel Tyler. Plaintiff, the North Carolina State Bar, was represented by Katherine E. Jean, Douglas J. Brocker, and Carmen K. Hoyme. Defendant, Michael 3. Nifong, was represented by attorneys David B. Freedman and Dudley A. Witt. Based upon the admissions contained in the pleadings and upon the evidence presented at the hearing, this Hearing Committee makes, by clear, cogent and convincing evidence, the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Plaintiff, the North Carolina State Bar, is a body duly organized under the laws of North Carolina and is the proper party to bring this proceeding under the authority granted it in Chapter 84 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and the Rules and Regulations of the North Carolina State Bar (Chapter 1 of Title 27 of the North Carolina Administrative Code). 2. Defendant, Michael B. Nifong, (hereinafter "Nifong"), was admitted to the North Carolina State Bar on August 19, 1978, and is, and was at all times referred to herein, an attorney at law licensed to practice in North Carolina, subject to the laws of the State of North Carolina, the Rules and Regulations of the North Carolina State Bar and the Revised Rules of Professional Conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duke Community Standard in Practice: a Guide for Undergraduates
    The Duke Community Standard in Practice: A Guide for Undergraduates Duke Community2012-2013 Standard in Practice 1 UNIVERSITY’S MISSION STATEMENT James B. Duke's founding Indenture of Duke University directed the members of the University to “provide real leadership in the educational world” by choosing individuals of “outstanding character, ability, and vision” to serve as its officers, trustees and faculty; by carefully selecting students of “character, determination and application;” and by pursuing those areas of teaching and scholarship that would “most help to develop our resources, increase our wisdom, and promote human happiness.” To these ends, the mission of Duke University is to provide a superior liberal education to undergraduate students, attending not only to their intellectual growth but also to their development as adults committed to high ethical standards and full participation as leaders in their communities; to prepare future members of the learned professions for lives of skilled and ethical service by providing excellent graduate and professional education; to advance the frontiers of knowledge and contribute boldly to the international community of scholarship; to promote an intellectual environment built on a commitment to free and open inquiry; to help those who suffer, cure disease, and promote health, through sophisticated medical research and thoughtful patient care; to provide wide ranging educational opportunities, on and beyond our campuses, for traditional students, active professionals and life-long learners using the power of information technologies; and to promote a deep appreciation for the range of human difference and potential, a sense of the obligations and rewards of citizenship, and a commitment to learning, freedom and truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Ethics
    (continued from front fl ap) Henn THERE’S A $60.00 USA/$72.00 CAN When the facts are all out, Bernie Madoff “NEW NORMAL” probably did not get up one morning and A Case Study Approach say, “I think I will reconstruct the original IN BUSINESS ETHICS A Case Study Approach Ponzi scheme and defraud investors.” For the vast majority of companies ruined by ethics Despite all the words and regulations aimed at building ethical and responsible BUSINESS scandals, there was something small that organizations, observed misbehavior has increased—think of the Siemens scandal eventually snowballed into an out-of-control and Bernie Madoff. Business Ethics: A Case Study Approach confronts the brutal BUSINESS situation. Business Ethics: A Case Study fact about business ethics as it exists today—it’s not working. BUSINESS ETHICS Approach is, now more than ever, essential reading for senior leaders of organizations, This stirring casebook powerfully draws a direct line between ethics and business I n the seven years since Enron exploded, it trustees, managing partners, government performance—that is, the sounder your company’s ethical foundation, the seems little has changed. The fi nancial crisis, offi cials, and anyone tasked with a duty— stronger it will perform in brand recognition, sales, customer satisfaction and the seemingly intractable problems facing loyalty, employee productivity, and even in reduced regulatory burdens. fi duciary or otherwise—to prevent that Detroit, and the bribery scandal that resulted “something small” from happening in the in an $800 million fi ne for Siemens, to name fi rst place. So, how can you develop leadership that sets the right a few have altered the business landscape tone at the top? for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. In the Supreme Court of the United States DAVID F. EVANS; COLLIN FINNERTY; READE SELIGMANN, PETITIONERS v. CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI DAVID S. RUDOLF KANNON K. SHANMUGAM RUDOLF WIDENHOUSE Counsel of Record & FIALKO CHRISTOPHER N. MANNING 225 East Worthington JAMES M. MCDONALD Avenue #200 LUKE MCCLOUD Charlotte, NC 28203 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. RICHARD D. EMERY Washington, DC 20005 ILANN M. MAAZEL (202) 434-5000 EMERY CELLI [email protected] BRINCKERHOFF & ABADY LLP 75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor New York, NY 10019 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether police officers who conspire with a prosecu- tor to fabricate evidence for subsequent use are immune from liability as a matter of law by virtue of the conspir- ing prosecutor’s decision to use the evidence. (I) PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Petitioners are David F. Evans; Collin Finnerty; and Reade Seligmann. Respondents are the City of Durham, North Carolina; David Addison; Patrick Baker; Steven W. Chalmers; Beverly Council; Mark Gottlieb; Benjamin Himan; Ronald Hodge; Jeff Lamb; Michael Ripberger; and Lee Russ. (II) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Opinions below ................................................................................ 1 Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 1 Statement ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide Are 1 in 5 Women Raped at College?
    STUDY GUIDE ARE 1 IN 5 WOMEN RAPED AT COLLEGE? KEY TERMS: rape assault feminist activist cultural norm epidemic evidence affirmative consent NOTE-TAKING COLUMN: Complete this section during the CUE COLUMN: Complete this section after video. Include definitions and key terms. the video. What is happening to the rate of rape crime in the U.S.? What is the truth about rape culture on college campuses? In the unscientific survey that Vice President Biden cited, who determined the number of respondents that had been victimized? What contributes to the deceptions regarding the topic of a rape culture on college campuses? According the BJS data, who is safer from rape: women in college or women not attending college? WWW.PRAGERU.COM DISCUSSION & REVIEW QUESTIONS: • At the beginning of the video, Miss Kitchens asks, “Are American college campuses “rape cultures?” Are they dangerous places where sexual assaults against women are happening at an alarming rate? According to many feminist activists, academics and politicians, the answer is yes.” How would you answer her questions? What is the evidence to support your answer? Where do you think that activists and the like are getting such an idea that this fictitious problem is real? • To the contrary, Miss Kitchens then states, “…while rape is certainly a serious problem, there is simply no evidence of a national campus rape epidemic, and there’s certainly no evidence that sexual violence is a “cultural norm” in 21st century America. In fact, rates of rape in the US are very low and have been declining for decades.” Considering the glaring lack of evidence for such claims of a rape epidemic, etc…, why do you think that some groups are attempting to promote such a deception? How do you think that such a false narrative fits into their political agenda? • We learn in the video that one result of some ill-informed and misguided people on the subject was that, “At Scripps College, Pulitzer-Prize winning commentator George Will was disinvited from giving a speech.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duke Lacrosse Case and the Blogosphere
    07__JOHNSON__CONTRACT PROOF.DOC 11/18/2008 11:42:21 AM THE DUKE LACROSSE CASE AND THE BLOGOSPHERE KC JOHNSON* I INTRODUCTION On December 28, 2006, Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong filed his initial response to the North Carolina State Bar grievance committee’s complaint that he had unethically withheld exculpatory DNA evidence in the Duke lacrosse case. Nifong concluded his missive with a swipe at the blogosphere: A well-connected and well-financed (but not, I would suggest, well-intentioned) group of individuals—most of whom are neither in nor from North Carolina—have taken it upon themselves to ensure that this case never reaches trial. (And if this seems like paranoid delusion to you, perhaps you should check out websites such as former Duke Law School graduate and current Maryland attorney Jason Trumpbour’s www.friendsofdukeuniversity.blogspot.com/, which has not only called for me to be investigated, removed from this case, and disbarred, but has also provided instructions on how to request such actions and to whom those requests should be sent.)1 A few months earlier, the District Attorney had similarly complained about the blogosphere. Asked in June 2006 by Newsweek reporter Susannah Meadows to comment on the mounting evidence of actual innocence, Nifong replied, “I have seen quite a bit of media speculation (and it is even worse on the blogs) that either starts from a faulty premise or builds to a demonstrably false conclusion. That is not my fault.”2 Nifong was hardly the only prominent figure associated with the case who read the blogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Cultural Master Plan
    Durham Cultural Master Plan Summary August 2004 What You Need to Know about Durham’s Cultural Master Plan Why is Durham’s arts and culture sector a vital asset? - Durham’s cultural organizations and artists add $103 million annually to the economic activity in Durham. That’s a significant boost to our city’s economic development. - Arts and culture is a significant business sector of the current and future Durham. According to a recent state-wide research study on arts economic impact in North Carolina, the average number of non-profit arts and cultural organizations per county in our state is 19. Durham County has more than 150 non-profit arts and cultural organizations, and more than 900 artists. Additionally it has a lively mix of commercial arts and entertainment providers. - A number of Durham’s own cultural assets are known internationally and nationally, including African American Dance Ensemble, American Dance Festival, NCCU Jazz Ensemble, Full Frame Film Festival, The Hayti Heritage Center and its Blues Festival, Durham Arts Council, Mallarmé Chamber Players, and the arts museums of NCCU and Duke. - Ninety percent of respondents to the Durham Cultural Master Plan’s Civic- Community-Business Leaders Survey agreed that arts and culture provide great ways to learn about our various ethnic and racial backgrounds. Ninety-two percent of the survey respondents agreed that “learning art skills is an important way to master other basic skills.” - National studies have proven that arts programs decrease youth delinquency, enhance a child’s development, encourage conflict resolution, build tolerance and self-respect, provide safe havens for youth, reduce criminal activity, teach job skills, improve attitudes, behavior, and academic performance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duke Rape Case Five Years Later: Lessons for the Academy, the Media, and the Criminal Justice System Dan Subotnik
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals June 2015 The Duke Rape Case Five Years Later: Lessons for the Academy, the Media, and the Criminal Justice System Dan Subotnik Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Subotnik, Dan (2012) "The Duke Rape Case Five Years Later: Lessons for the Academy, the Media, and the Criminal Justice System," Akron Law Review: Vol. 45 : Iss. 4 , Article 4. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol45/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Subotnik: The Duke Rape Case 10- SUBTONIK_MACRO.DOCM 10/12/2012 3:01 PM THE DUKE RAPE CASE FIVE YEARS LATER: LESSONS FOR THE ACADEMY, THE MEDIA, AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Dan Subotnik∗ If engagement is the first step in healing, then the second is pure unadulterated struggle. We will never achieve racial healing if we do not confront one another, take risks. say all the things we are not supposed to say in mixed company.
    [Show full text]
  • Fantastic Allegations Defending the Police Supervisors in the Duke Lacrosse Lawsuits Tricia Shields Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe &A
    Fantastic Allegations Defending the Police Supervisors in the Duke Lacrosse Lawsuits Tricia Shields Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo LLP [email protected] Introduction: On March 25, 2006, a story that would soon consume the community and fascinate the nation appeared on the front page of the local newspapers in Raleigh and Durham, North Carolina. Both reported that a young woman – an exotic dancer – had been raped and sodomized by three members of the Duke University lacrosse team, when performing at a party. The dancer was described as the mother of two and a student at North Carolina Central University, a historically African American university in Durham. A neighbor reported that he had seen the woman and another dancer entering the house where the party was held, and when she left a short time later, he heard a man yell at her, "’Thank your grandpa for my cotton shirt.' " Samiha Khanna, Dancer Gives Details of Ordeal, News & Observer, March 25, 2006, at A1. In the following weeks, protests, vigils, and rallies were held on the Duke and NC Central campuses. The lacrosse season was cancelled, and the coach forced to resign. The national media descended onto Durham, where District Attorney Michael Nifong stepped into the limelight, making dozens of inflammatory statements about the case and the players. Nifong subsequently recused himself from the prosecution amidst a State Bar proceeding that resulted in his disbarment, was convicted of criminal contempt for failing to turn over critical evidence in the case, and filed for bankruptcy. Three players were indicted, but were ultimately declared innocent by the North Carolina Attorney General.
    [Show full text]
  • DUKE BASKETBALL | GAME NOTES Goduke.Com | @Dukembb | #Herecomesduke
    FIVE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS 1991 1992 2001 2010 2015 DUKE BASKETBALL | GAME NOTES GoDuke.com | @DukeMBB | #HereComesDuke » 2020-21 SCHEDULE | H: 2-2; A: 1-0; N: 0-0 » SATURDAY, JANUARY 2, 2021 | TUCKER CENTER | TALLAHASSEE, FLA. | 8 P.M. AP Rank Date Duke Opp Opponent TV Time/Result NOVEMBER (1-0) N 28 9 - COPPIN STATE ACCNX W 81-71 DECEMBER (2-2) GAME D 1 6 8 MICHIGAN STATE - 1 ESPN L 69-75 D 4 6 - BELLARMINE - 2 RSN W 76-54 D 8 10 6 ILLINOIS - 3 ESPN L 68-83 D 16 21 - at Notre Dame * ESPN W 75-65 6 D 29 20 - PITTSBURGH * ACCN ppd. FLORIDA STATE SEMINOLES VS. DUKE BLUE DEVILS JANUARY (0-0) J 2 20 18 at Florida State * ESPN2 8 p.m. 5-2 1-1 #18/19 3-2 1-0 #20/nr OVERALL ACC AP / COACHES RANK OVERALL ACC AP / COACHES RANK J 6 - - BOSTON COLLEGE * ACCN 8:30 p.m. J 9 - - WAKE FOREST * ACCN 12 p.m. J 12 - - at Virginia Tech * ESPN/2/U 7 p.m. Leonard Hamilton UT-MARTIN ‘71 Mike Krzyzewski ARMY ‘69 J 19 - - at Pittsburgh * ESPN 9 p.m. HEAD COACH HEAD COACH J 23 - - at Louisville * ESPN 4 p.m. J 26 - - GEORGIA TECH * ESPN 9 p.m. 565-433 .566 365-223 .621 1,160-352 .767 1,087-293 .788 CAREER (33rd YEAR) AT FSU (19th YEAR) CAREER (46th YEAR) AT DUKE (41st YEAR) J 30 - - CLEMSON * ESPN 12 p.m. FEBRUARY (0-0) F 1 - - at Miami * ESPN 7 p.m.
    [Show full text]