Örebro University School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences Sociology
C a n w e s l o w d o w n ? Challenges and possibilities of living slower and simpler in Sweden.
Sandra Österlund
Spring 2020
Master’s Course, Sociology with a Sustainable Development Focus
Author: Sandra Österlund
Supervisor: Karin Gustafsson
Examiner: Magnus Boström Acknowledgements
Becoming emerged in the life narratives of the participants in this study has given me a sense of insight and serenity. A huge thank you to those who agreed to be a part of this thesis, it has been a pleasure and truly delightful to read and listen to your stories and reflections, filled with so much beauty and thought.
I also want to show appreciation to all the other bloggers, youtubers and members of discussion forums I have flickered through, that has given me a glimpse of what some people call a ‘movement’ or a ‘transition’ or even an ‘awakening’. The dedication and wisdom found on so many places has truly been an injection of hope.
Thank you also to my supervisor Karin Gustafsson for helpful discussions, perspectives and suggestions. Talking to you always gave me more direction, focus and renewed energy.
Last but not least, thank you to my husband Simon and my daughter Vilda for showing endless love, patience, and steering up our life while I was busy writing about others’. Mom is coming out of her room now.
Sandra Österlund, 31/5 2020, Örebro
II Abstract
This thesis takes its departure in the view of modern society as being characterised by a heavy focus on efficiency and economic growth, and the perception that everything is moving faster and faster in line with Hartmut Rosa’s (2009) theory of ‘Social acceleration’. The effects of this can be seen in rising numbers of stress related sicknesses and mental health problems, as well as a heavy pressure on the earth’s resources to facilitate continued growth. The aim of the thesis is to investigate the challenges and possibilities for individuals in Sweden to slow down and live a simpler life in this context. Previous research suggests that slower lifestyles can be beneficial both for wellbeing and environmental sustainability reasons, so understanding the preconditions of this to be possible can be an important aspect when trying to plan for a sustainable future. The theoretical framework consists of the model of voluntary simplicity lifestyle (VSL) by Osikominu and Bocken (2020), the theory of social acceleration by Rosa (2009) and selected writings on Social Change. The thesis is based on a thematic analysis of empiric material from individuals in Sweden who has transitioned to a slower and more simple lifestyle, generally in terms of working less, reducing their consumption and living closer no nature, and also are visible on social media, reaching out to many others as inspiration. The material consists of writings and recordings from the study-persons in the form of blog-posts and podcasts. The study could confirm that many parts of the VSL-model also were applicable and experienced in the Swedish context. Most participants had in common that their previous lifestyle was characterised by stress, pressure, and living according to others expectations, in line with Rosa's theory of social acceleration. Their new slower and simpler lifestyles were a decision to follow their own path in life and start to value their time more. The challenges that could be recognised were the norm of working full-time, achievement values, living outside the norm, ethical dilemmas regarding consumption and, for those living on the countryside, transport and infrastructure. The possibilities most recognised were concerning their wellbeing, closely related to their possibility of finding time for recovery, as well as living more in contact with the environment. Social life appeared both as a challenge and a possibility.
Keywords: slow living, voluntary simplicity, downshifting, minimalism, sustainability, social acceleration, social change
III
Bill Wattersson (1995) Calvin and Hobbes
IV Table of Contents
1 Introduction 7 1.1 Research Objective 8 1.2 Research Question 9 1.3 Disposition 9 2 Previous Research 10 2.1 Living slower and simpler 10 2.2 Slow, simple and sustainable? 13 2.3 Summary 16 3 Theoretical Framework 18 3.1 The VSL-model 18 3.2 Social Acceleration 22 3.3 Social Change 25 3.4 Application of the theories 27 4 Method and Material 28 4.1 Selection of Study-Persons 28 4.2 Material 29 4.3 Thematic Analysis 30 4.4 Limitations 31 4.5 Ethical considerations 31 5 Findings & Analysis 33 5.1 Lifestyle Change 33 5.2 Challenges 38 5.3 Possibilities 44 6 Conclusions 47 6.1 Contribution of the thesis 48 6.2 Future Research 48 Afterthoughts 49 References 50
V List of Abbreviations
SP Study-Person VSL Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle
List of Figures
Figure 1 The VSL-model Figure 2 VSL Practices and Effects Model
VI 1 Introduction
In a world that seems to be moving faster and faster, how do we find time to live? Are we working to live or living to work? Many parts of society today have become obsessed about time and efficiency. A telling example is the Swedish elderly care. Among others, Sundgren (2020) and Adamo (2019) describes how the work used to be human-focused, with time to sit down for a coffee and a small chat with a lonely elder. Today it has instead become increasingly stressful, with ever tighter schedules and shorter visits. Every minute spent at each care-patient is logged, and all tasks has a calculated standardised time that should be followed, even showers and bathroom visits (Sundgren, 2020). Human connection is out of the calculation. German sociologist Hartmut Rosa (2009), explain this efficiency obsession by arguing that the overarching capitalistic system needs economic growth to function, and the prerequisite for growth is an increase of output in relation to time, or in other words, efficiency. However, a growing number of scholars has started to investigate what society could look like if the growth-aspect was removed from its pedestal (Demaria et al., 2019; Kallis et al., 2018; Svenfelt et al., 2019). If the environment and human wellbeing instead would be centre of attention. Societal change and a transformation towards more sustainable lifestyles has been suggested to constitute a necessary part of the path to securing the future of our planet, and even though many scholars have explored alternative forms of organisations and experiments in an attempted to find ways in which this change can take place, a plausible way towards a radical transition remains blurred (Schmid, B, 2019). At the same time, the degree of stress and mental health problems are rising, and Alex Szollos (2009) has brought to attention the issue of ‘chronic time pressure’ as a prominent feature of today’s society.
Although society as a whole has not yet gone through this suggested transformation, some individuals has begun to shift their personal focus, trying to live a slower and more simple life in connection to nature, community, friends and family. These values seem to be growing, and were identified in a european study of what aspects of life people would want more of in the future (INHERIT, 2019). Also, terminology describing these trends, such as slow living, downshifting, voluntary simplicity and minimalism are increasingly studied (Alexander et al., 2012; Lamb, 2019; Osikominu & Bocken, 2020; Uggla, 2019). Basic traits underpinning these concepts includes a reduction of working hours, leading to reduced income and increased free time. To enable this reduced income, a central aspect is to reduce expenses, often through consuming less. Previous research suggests that lifestyle changes in these directions are beneficial in terms of wellbeing, life 7 satisfaction and in environmental terms as a result of reduced consumption (Alexander et al., 2012; Lamb, 2019; Osikominu & Bocken, 2020).
How this change can happen on a societal level however is a matter for discussion. Some argue that we should prepare for societies with less or no growth before we are forced to do so because of a crisis. Other suggests that a crisis often is needed and can be viewed as a push in a new direction. Currently, the world is experiencing one of the deepest crises in modern times due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. Many countries have imposed a lockdown of society and various degrees of curfew for citizens, and the world economy is in free fall. Some have raised subtle hopes that this could provide a possibility to change path in a greener and more socially sustainable direction. Recently, a UN chief described the pandemic as an ‘unprecedented wake-up call’ and the biggest crisis since world war 2, urging the whole world to work together and change crucial aspects of our social and economic system (UN, 2020). Last time we had a great economic recession, in 2008, Erik Assadourian (2010) wrote about the rise of a new culture and new values, a rethinking in what is most important for the quality of life. What has happened since then? Did we forget our ‘new’ values as the economy recovered? And what makes us think that this time it will be different?
1.1 Research Objective In an attempt to contribute to the challenge of managing a sustainable transition with a focus on human wellbeing and less stress on the earth’s resources as well as our minds, this study aims at investigating the possibilities that exists for individuals to transition towards a slower lifestyle. In doing so, the focus will also lie on what challenges people meet in their efforts to live slower and simpler. Some key challenges for individuals attempting slower lifestyles have already been recognised in previous research by Lamb (2019), Alexander et al. (2012), Osikominu & Bocken (2020) and Sandlin et al. (2009) mainly in terms of social norms and lack of suitable employment and infrastructure. The current study aims to see if similar experiences are also found in Sweden. This is interesting due to the importance of social and cultural context when it comes to lifestyles, and the apparent lack of research on the Swedish context in this regard. If these challenges are better understood, they could possibly serve as guidance in political and societal efforts to support lifestyle choices in a slower and simpler direction, and as a consequence also a more sustainable direction. An underlying argument for why personal lifestyle choices would need political support is
8 that personal possibilities of making life choices to some degree are dependent on what politics and policies are in place in society. Hence, the subject of lifestyles is of both individual and societal character.
1.2 Research Question Based on previous research on improved wellbeing and environmental gains connected to slower and simpler lifestyles, the underlying assumption for the thesis is that a personal transition to a slower and more simple life should be possible to attempt by those who feel drawn to it. In order to provide a firmer ground for understanding the needs for this to be possible, the main research question is:
• What challenges and possibilities are recognised by individuals in Sweden who want to transition to a slower and more simple way of living?
This will be investigated by analysing the content and narratives communicated in personal blogs and podcasts on the topics of living slower and simpler.
1.3 Disposition Chapter 2 of Previous Research will introduce the concept of Slow Living and discuss it in relation to previous research on the related topics of Downshifting, Minimalism, Voluntary Simplicity and Sustainable Development. After this, chapter 3 of Theoretical Framework will first present a newly developed model for understanding the Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle, followed by a theory of modernity in terms of Social Acceleration as well as a brief discussion of Social Change. The chapter of Method and Material will explain how the current study was conducted. The chapter of Findings and Analysis will present the findings of the current study and relate it to the theoretical framework of voluntary simplicity, social acceleration and social change. Lastly, conclusions will be presented, followed by reflections in regard to future research.
9 2 Previous Research
This section will begin with a short introduction of the concept of slow living, and previous research on the related topics of downshifting, minimalism and voluntary simplicity. This is followed by previous research on peoples experiences of living slower and simpler, with a focus on challenges and possibilities. Lastly, previous research on slow living in relation to sustainability is presented and discussed.
2.1 Living slower and simpler
The concept of Slow living The ideas of slow living can arguably be traced back to the writings of Henry David Thoreau in the mid 19th century. In his book ‘Walden’ he criticise society’s alienation from nature, and describe the good life of simplicity in his small forest cabin (Thoreau, 1854). In more recent time, the ‘Slow food movement’ begun in Italy 1986 founded by Carlo Petrini as a response to McDonalds opening in Rome. Later it also received its acronym ‘sustainable, local, organic, whole’ (Kowalski, n.d.). Initially it was a movement agains fast food, but has since then evolved to include many other parts of life. In 1999 Petrini expanded his movement to include the objective of ‘slow cities’, argued by Mayer (2006) to have promising possibilities responding to the challenges of combining environmental, social and economic sustainability. The same year, Geir Berthelsen founded the World Institute of Slowness, with the vision statement ‘slow the world down to create healthier, happier and more productive people’ (The World Institute of Slowness, n. d.).
Slow living and the modern society Wendy Parkins (2004), studying the ‘slow movement’ argues that the capacity for reflection is central to slowness. However, she emphasises that slowness also requires institutional support for its continued existence, and for the improvement of society as a result. She argues that modern everyday life is characterised by habit and inattentiveness, and thus do not provide opportunities for reflection. According to Emma McGuric (2017), strategies for slowing down life include working less, spending less and sharing more. Her research focus on Timebanking, a local system where people can trade services with each other, based on time instead of money. McGurik (2017) points at the connectedness between Timebanking and the philosophies of degrowth, downsizing, and 10 voluntary simplicity, all sharing the increased valuation of time. McGurik (2017) further argues that there is a transformative potential of modest changes in practice and wants to contribute to the discussion on how to downscale production and consumption, increase wellbeing and ecological conditions.
Ylva Uggla (2019) suggests that minimalism, defined as reducing the amount of things one owns, is an under category of voluntary simplicity and can be seen as a way of ‘dealing with situations of discontent’ (p. 249), and an individual attempt at resisting the speed of life. Although expressed in varying forms, she recognise a core purpose in striving for freedom and a meaningful life. She further recognises a contradiction in the perception of time and tempo, where intentional form of living in the moment needs to be balanced with the goal of enabling long term planning. Uggla (2019) also differentiates minimalism from voluntary simplicity arguing that voluntary simplifiers often have more prominent environmental motivations.
Foifu (2015) also draws a connection between slowness, downshifting and voluntary simplicity, saying that the meaning of ‘slow’ is an important aspect of all these lifestyles. She further argues that hence, these lifestyles has important roles to play within capitalist societies today, that are characterised by speed, efficiency and growth, offering a shift in focus towards ‘more spiritual and emotional wellbeing rather than material accumulation’ (p. 63). Foifu (2015), continuing from this line of thought, further wants to explore what it would mean to slow down. She suggests that ‘utopian thinking’ can be used as a way of responding to a crisis, and challenge the view of ‘economic fatalism’ which suggests that the world can only be the way it is. She also recognises a restriction in the terminology of fast and slow, as both are variables of speed, but argue that time itself does not necessarily have to be described as a motion.
In the current thesis ‘slow living’ will be used as an umbrella term, sharing common ground with the other concepts such as downshifting, voluntary simplicity and minimalism, as shown above. However, when referring to other studies on a specific sub-category, the original term used in respective study will be used for clarity reasons.
Experiences of living slower and simpler Samuel Alexander et al. (2012) have conducted a large online survey analysing the ‘voluntary simplicity movement’ where the aim is to lower the consumption and improve the quality of life. As 11 of 2012 the survey had been answered by 2268 people who were considered part of the movement. The criteria for being ‘part of the movement’ and hence included in the study was defined as ‘voluntarily reduced or restrained income, consumption, and / or working hours’. Thus, these aspects serve as a qualification for a slower lifestyle as well. The questions regarded happiness, income, community and politics. Participants in the study was mainly from North America and Australia, and were living quite evenly spread in big cites, middle sized cities, small towns and rural areas. In Alexander et al. (2012)’s survey, almost 50% of the respondents had reduced working hours and 38% changed careers. The results suggest that more time enable the participants to have more active leisure time, spending far less time on television compared to the average (Alexander et al., 2012). Kraisornsuthasinee et al. (2017) conducted six in depth interviews with voluntary simplifiers in Thailand in order to better understand what impact their lifestyle choices had on their career paths. The results from the interviews conducted by Kraisornsuthasinee et al. (2017) indicate a strong connection between the lifestyle transition and a more ethical choice of career, for example abandoning a high paid positions in marketing in favour of a freelance position which offered better opportunities to balance work with family life, or leaving a private hospital to work in a lower paid government hospital open for everyone. These studies shows that in terms of work, the transition to a slower and simpler lifestyle is closely connected to working less as well as choosing your work more in accordance with your values.
General preferences in terms of consumption found by Alexander et al. (2012) were towards hand made, home made, long lasting high quality products and second hand. The most important thing was not spending less but spending more thoughtfully, in line with Parkins (2004) argument that the capacity for reflection was central for living slower. Other common practices were home food production, with 83% reporting growing their own food to some degree. 63% tried to mostly eat fresh and unprocessed food, in line with the central values of the slow food movement described above. In regards of clothing, 95% answered that they, to different extents, bought second hand, made their own, and repaired what they already have (Alexander et al., 2012). Hence, the research of Alexander et al. (2012) shows that the consumption among people living slower and simpler generally is characterised by consuming less as well as consuming differently and more thoughtfully.
David Lamb (2019) have investigated what challenges individuals who have transitioned to a slower lifestyle within a faster society have met. The study was made in an urban setting in western 12 Australia using focus group discussions with 18 participants. Lamb (2019) find that the most impactful hardship among his participants is lack of understanding of their chosen lifestyle from family and friends. In this category also fall the ‘problem of gift-giving’ recognised by Janet Lorenzen (2018) to be an important challenge for reducing consumption. She conducted 45 interviews with individuals attempting to live simpler and more sustainable. In her findings, many were bothered over the pressure to consume in order to show appreciation towards others, and therefore felt unable to withdraw completely from buying gifts, but instead often turning to more ethical products as a compromise. Judgement from others were also recognised by Sandlin et al. (2009), studying identity building within the voluntary simplicity movement, by analysing discussion threads on the Simple Living Network Webpage. In their findings, several members described how they had been ridiculed by coworkers for riding a bike or choosing to not eat out. Based on these studies, most challenges experienced seem to be of a social character, concerning the participants relationships with others. Additionally, the biggest obstacles for living simply, identified by Alexander et al. (2012), was reported to be suitable transport and suitable employment.
In terms of the advantages with slower and simpler lifestyles, Alexander et al. (2012) found that out of those who reported living less simple lives before, 87% stated that they felt happier after the transition to a more simple lifestyle, and only 0.3% reported feeling less happy. Lamb (2019) in turn, could identify opportunities of slow living connected to people's well being primarily through providing the individual with more control over ones time. Boujbel et al. (2012), studying the relationship between voluntary simplicity and life satisfaction, also conclude that the aspect of control is an important factor. They argue that the individual’s ability to control their own consumption desires, especially among those with less financial resources, has a positive impact on their satisfaction with life. Lastly, Mangold et al. (2019) have studied the tiny house movement, where people are downsizing their place of living in exchange for more freedom and less or no mortgage, in search for ‘the good life’. Their findings also suggests that more time and control over their life situation are important opportunities of the tiny house lifestyle, together with the opportunities for more experiences and more time on relationships.
2.2 Slow, simple and sustainable?
In order to provide a stronger foundation for the societal relevance of slower and simpler lifestyles, this section will elaborate further on the effects of slow living practices, in relation to sustainable 13 development. The review is organised around the three sustainability pillars of environmental, social and economic sustainability. This way of interpreting the dimensions of sustainability are widely adopted and can be considered customary according to Boström (2012) and explained as a paradigm by Seghezzo (2009).
Environmental sustainability Reviewing research that connects environmental sustainability with typical practices of voluntary simplifiers such as working less and consuming less, the central argument in terms of environmental sustainability is that less consumption equals less need for material extraction and leads to less pressure on the earth’s resources. Although many scholars argue that, most importantly, a reduction of overconsumption is necessary to reach environmental sustainability, others are pointing at potential conflicts that might stand in the way for realising their intention.
Parkins & Craig (2011) explain that Ethical consuming requires more time than conventional consuming and hence is favoured by a slow lifestyle. Further, the perception of what time is will differ in this perspective, as temporalities connected to sustainability is tied to seasons and natural life cycles. Therefore, Parkins & Craig (2011, p. 196) recognise the opportunity of slowness to ‘bring us closer to nature and experience seasonality’.
On the other hand, Blake Alcott (2008) is not convinced that reduced consumption automatically translates into environmental benefits. He suggests that environmentally negative effects can remain, even if some people consume less, and explains this by pointing out that lower prices due to decreased demand in turn will attract more consumption from others. However, this argument is based on a small number of people changing their habits, and do not consider the plausible consequence if a substantially larger number of people would change their lifestyles and consume less. Further, the complexity of the question becomes clear when looking at the definitions of ‘environmental benefit’ and how these potential rebound-effects are calculated. For instance in Buhl et al. (2016) research, building on the ideas of Alcott (2008), a switch to local and organic whole food were considered more environmentally harmful than ‘efficient’ processed alternatives, contrary to the conventional view of local and organic food as sustainable.
14 Social sustainability In terms of Social sustainability , this paper will focus on individual wellbeing and overall satisfaction with life. Findings from various studies shows that increased wellbeing and overall life satisfaction are reported by individuals who have transitioned to slower lifestyles (Buhl et al., 2016; Alexander et al., 2012: Lamb, 2019; Osikominu & Bocken, 2020). Buhl et al. (2016) also studied the potential unintentional effects of reducing working hours for environmental and wellbeing reasons. According to their findings, all respondents report an increase in life satisfaction after voluntary decreasing their working hours. Many had also started to engage more in voluntary and informal work, as also found by Osikominu & Bocken (2020). Alexander et al. (2012) comes to similar conclusions in their study of the voluntary simplicity movement. As mentioned above, and also relevant in this context, they found that 87% of the respondents felt happier after the lifestyle transition, and only 0.3% reported feeling less happy (Alexander et al., 2012). Judging from these findings, the connection between a voluntary slower and simpler lifestyle and improved feelings of life satisfaction seems to be quite uncontested.
However, some studies complicate the matter slightly. Krogman et al. (2013) explores the possibility of a double dividend (simultaneously improved wellbeing and reduced environmental impact), among the more narrow category of ‘downshifters’, who have reduced their work hours without environmental motives, and receive contradictory results concerning their perceived quality of life. Other studies also shows that increased free time do not necessarily leads to improved life satisfaction. Kennedy et al. (2013) made a Canadian survey among people who had reduced their working hours, looking for a positive double dividend in terms of environmental behaviour and life satisfaction and found no significant correlation between downshifting and increased life satisfaction. Similarily, Szollos (2009), who has studied the concept of chronic time pressure, explains an overall tendency of increased leisure time, but also increased feelings of time pressure.
In this context, one could discuss the importance of what you fill your free time with. This could to some extent explain better results when looking at more throughly transformed lifestyles, for example the voluntary simplicity movement, compared to research where more narrow parameters have been studied, for example the study among downshifters. Further, those studies that have compared levels of life satisfaction before and after a lifestyle change has almost exclusively reported increased happiness compared to their previous situation, indicating that even if not everyone per se necessarily would benefit from a slower life, those who for some reason choose to 15 do so generally end up improving their subjective level of life satisfaction. Based on this, the conclusion is that supporting slower lifestyles can still be well justified with social arguments, and as a response to growing health issues related to stress and burnout syndrome.
Economic sustainability One of the core ideas of slower and simpler living is to reduce the centrality of the economy and showing alternative directions. Connected to this is the increasingly discussed concept of degrowth, as an alternative to the unbalanced focus on economic growth in todays western society. Research on degrowth suggest that the assumption that the economy can continue to grow indefinitely cannot be taken for granted, and thus, preparing for a potentially necessary degrowth is of importance (Svenfelt et al. 2019). Svenfelt et al. (2019) argue that, for instance, some small towns in Sweden already experience degrowth, and therefore it would make sense to include the possibility of this when planning for the future. Kallis et al. (2018) have reviewed extensive research on degrowth, and argue that reduced working hours, in line with the concept of slow living, is a common feature in practically every degrowth scenario developed, the main reason being to avoid large scale unemployment.
One of the most voiced arguments against degrowth is that the growing economy better enables us to lift more people out of poverty, increase wellbeing and achieve social justice. However, Paulson (2017) points at the weak correlation between economic growth (GDP) and positive outcomes such as longevity, literacy, equality, health and happiness. Further she argues that extensive evidence exist regarding negative environmental and social effects from material and economic growth, but that despite this, securing continued economic growth is on nearly every policy agenda. Buhr at al. (2018) come to similar conclusions in their case study on Alingsås, a Swedish municipality who have expressed interest in degrowth reasonings. Their results show that questioning the ‘good’ of economic growth is not expected from public officials and assumed extreme or unrealistic, and hence has not so far had any impact on policy.
2.3 Summary
The previous research has shown that slow living and related lifestyles are associated with working less and differently and consuming less and differently. Identified challenges are tied to social norms and infrastructure and advantages are identified in terms of increased control over ones life
16 and increased wellbeing. In terms of sustainability, slow living seems to be beneficial for the environment, people’s wellbeing and increased societal engagement. Slow living also offers a critique against the current centrality of economic growth. In the current study, the hope will be to offer improved understanding of people’s experiences of living slower in Sweden, especially in terms of perceived challenges. Further, a reflection of the role of personal lifestyles in a broader quest for a sustainable future will be attempted.
17 3 Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework will include a model of the Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle developed by Jessica Osikominu and Nancy Bocken (2020), the theory of Social Acceleration by Hartmut Rosa (2009) and a selection of writings on Social Change.
3.1 The VSL-model
Osikominu and Bocken (2020) has developed a model describing the Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle (VSL). The model is based on existing literature as well as an additional nine interviews from different countries. Figure 1 shows an overview of the VSL-model, followed by more detailed descriptions of the different parts, which consists of VSL values + prior values, VSL adoption, VSL practices and VSL effects.
Figure 1: The VSL-model and its conceptual framework (Osikominu & Bocken, 2020).
18 VSL Values and Prior Values ‘Values’ refers to what one perceives as important in life. The values identified with the voluntary simplicity lifestyle in the VSL-model are Universalism, Benevolence, Stimulation and Self-direction (Osikominu & Bocken, 2020). • ‘Universalism’ is described as caring for global social and environmental challenges. • ‘Benevolence’ relates to caring for people with whom one are in close contact, mostly evident in the VSL-model through increased time spent on relationships with family, friends, and community. • ‘Stimulation’ is described as valuing ‘excitement, novelty and challenge in life’ (p. 7) and was manifested as a dissatisfaction with the mainstream lifestyle, wanting more out of life. • ‘Self-direction’ is described as independent thinking, action, creation and exploration. This was the VSL value most strongly identified in the study, mainly shown as a drive to find their own purpose in life and by actively reflect on the choices they make and what their priorities are.
Osikominu & Bocken (2020) further suggest that the values of ‘Self-direction’ and ‘Stimulation’ was suppressed before the lifestyle change. In addition to this, they found one ‘rather weak’ sign of a value shift in that participants, after their lifestyle shift, claimed to no longer be guided by the value of Achievement, here described as ‘personal success through demonstrating competence according to social standards’ (p. 9).
VSL Adoption The process of transitioning into a lifestyle of voluntary simplicity is described in terms of Triggers, Enablers and Barriers, which can be either Internal or External (Osikominu & Bocken, 2020). • ‘Triggers’ are what initiated the lifestyle change. The most important identified triggers were external and stemming from significant life events or feelings of dissatisfaction, for example from having a job that is stressful or lacking meaning.
• ‘Enablers’ are what makes the transition possible. Here, Internal enablers were most important, in terms of inner growth and satisfaction from following your own path instead of others expectations. Also valuing time more than money and cutting costs through reevaluating what you actually need are common internal enablers. External enablers were mainly ones partner or new friends with similar values.
19 • ‘Barriers’ are what makes the VSL adoption more difficult. The most important barriers were external, and in particular disapproval from friends and family. Also, the problem of finding work that met their values or preferred working hours could be an important barrier. Other external barriers identified was economy, culture, infrastructure and educational system. The economy and society in general was perceived as negative. No internal barrier of significance was identified.
VSL Practices A main feature of the model is a compilation of various practices connected to the lifestyle of voluntary simplicity. In the first stage of the transition, Osikominu and Bocken (2020) argue that a reduction of work (less hours or resigning) leads to reduced income and increased free time, as shown in the yellow area in Figure 2. The reduced income leads to less or different material consumption. The increased free time on the other hand leads to increased non-material experiences. These two main changes leads to a new set of practices, unique for each individual, as shown in the blue area of Figure 2. The model includes a total of 151 identified VSL practices, divided into the five categories of Materialism, Basic Needs, Relationships, Cognitive Activities, and Physical Activities, the practices of most significance described below.
Figure 2: VSL Practices and Effects Model, within the larger VSL-model shown above, (Osikominu & Bocken, 2020)
• ‘Materialism’ practices included decluttering and getting rid of things in a conscious way, giving away to second hand stores and friends instead of throwing away. Other common practices was avoiding buying new things, practicing more conscious consumption or making things oneself. Existing possessions was valued more and better maintained.
20 • ‘Basic Needs’ was divided into the home, eating, dressing and transportation. In regard to ones home, it was common to make changes in a more sustainable and self-sufficient direction such as natural insulation, water tanks, solar panels, outdoor ovens, and planting trees. Reducing waste or aiming at zero-waste was also a common practice. Osikominu & Bocken (2020) further found that most people did not move, but those who did chose smaller houses in more rural areas, smaller apartments or cooperative housing. Many grow their own food, buy food from a local cooperative and also buy organic and Fairtrade to a larger extent. Meat consumption was reduced, and many started to cook more from scratch and compost food waste. In terms of dressing, it was common to avoid fast trends. Some created a capsule wardrobe of a few quality pieces designed to last for a long time. General practices was buying less and more consciously. In regard to transportation, most do not want to be dependent on a car, but are so to some extent anyway. When possible, they try, to different degrees, use walking, biking, hitchhiking, carpooling and public transport instead, or at least reducing the number of car trips through more planning. Walking brought closeness to nature and time for meditation for some.
• ‘Relationships’ practices included spending more time with family and friends than before. New friendships with people sharing similar values emerged, while old ones drifted apart. It was also common to engage more in society through volunteering or advocating for environmental or social causes. Many wanted to inspire their surrounding as a VSL role model. Better at saying no to things and relationships they do not want. The perception of to what extent they are part of a movement is varying.
• ‘Cognitive Activities’ included searching for new knowledge in philosophy, psychology, science, sustainability, the economic system, sufficiency skills, education or simple living. Related to the inner life, many started meditation, journaling or yoga. An increased interest in arts and culture was also recognised.
• ‘Physical Activities’ was shown in higher interest in fitness and health, often through gardening, running and biking. Also spending more time in nature, going for walks and hiking were common practices in this category.
VSL effects The four identified effects of the VSL practices were increased wellbeing, increased education, pro- social and pro-environmental impacts (Osikominu & Bocken, 2020). 21 • ‘Wellbeing’ was expressed by participants in the study as ‘less anxiety, more life satisfaction, more control about life, more slowness, more balance, more freedom to do what one loves, owning less, improved mental and physical health, improved financial situations and voluntary hardship to fix or create things themselves’. • ‘Education’ increased primarily through the cognitive practices of gaining new knowledge, learning about oneself. • ‘Pro-social impacts’ was mainly achieved from relationship related practices. • ‘Pro-environmental impacts’ came from practices where material things are consumed less or differently.
3.2 Social Acceleration
In 1999, James Gleick wrote the book ‘Faster: The acceleration of just about everything’. Many would probably instinctually agree that this is an accurate description of society today, and those would not be alone. The historian Koselleck claims we can trace general complains about the ‘speed of modern society’ back to the mid 18th century. Inspired by these, and many other writings and observations, sociologist Hartmut Rosa (2009) has developed a framework trying to make sense of this general sense of speed. The basis for his analysis are four basic processes of modernisation recognised by Simmel (Individualisation), Durkheim (Differentiation), Weber (Rationalisation) and Marx (the domestication of nature). Rosa’s addition is the dimension of temporality. The result is a theory he calls ‘Social acceleration’ which aims at describing the basic traits of modern society and its development.
Categories of acceleration Rosa (2009) divides his theory of social acceleration into three categories of acceleration, namely the acceleration of technology, social change and pace of life. Acceleration of technology refers to the most easily measured speed up of various transportation modes, communication and production, that takes place within society. Acceleration of social change refers to the acceleration of society itself in terms of ‘attitudes and values, as well as fashions and lifestyles, social relations and obligations … (and) forms of practice and habits’ (Rosa, 2009, p. 83). An important aspect is the contraction of the present, defined as the period in which your experience will inform your expectations. Acceleration of the pace of life refers to the ‘speed and compression of actions and
22 experiences in everyday life’ that has been enabled by the technological acceleration (Rosa, 2009, p. 85). Paradoxically, technical development is often justified with its possibilities of saving time, but instead we feel more stressed than ever. This is because increased efficiency has resulted in demand for increased productivity, and as long as the demand for productivity remains slightly higher then the pace we are working in, we will feel stress and time scarcity, even if we do more than ever before. Related to this paradox, Rosa (2009, p. 87) describes the connection between growth and speed: ‘Free time is produced when the technological acceleration rate is above the rate of growth, where “growth” refers to all kinds of time consuming actions and processes’. With this in mind, Rosa’s theory becomes highly relevant to the current debate on growth, and more recently, degrowth.
Drivers of acceleration Further, Rosa (2009) recognise three important drivers to social acceleration: the economic, cultural and structural motor. The economic motor drives the acceleration of technology. The logic of capitalism connects growth with acceleration in the need to increase production (growth) as well as productivity (output per unit time). Rosa (2009) argues that many authors have attributed all forms of acceleration to capitalism (for instance Sennet, Harvey, Scheuerman and Postone). Here, capitalism, making up the economic motor, is viewed as one out of three important drivers of acceleration. The cultural motor drives the acceleration of the pace of life. According to Rosa (2009), the dominant culture that has emerged is that a good life equals a fulfilled life, rich in experiences and developed capacities. Secularisation of time means a focus on realising as many options as possible in ‘real’ life instead of waiting for a ‘higher life’ after death. An effect from this is the feeling of stress: the world has much more to offer than what can be experienced in a lifetime. An attempt to solve the problem has been to increase the efficiency to fit in more experiences. However, higher efficiency in turn creates even more options, resulting in that we are able to experience an even lesser share of ‘everything’. The structural motor drives the acceleration of social change. Rosa (2009) explains that the modernisation process of functional differentiation (politics, science, art, economy etc) leads to a high complexity, which creates an abundance of options and possibilities, and attempts to more efficient processes, similar to the acceleration of pace of life.
23 Deceleration In order to ‘test’ to what length his theory of acceleration occurs, Rosa (2009) also wants to investigate the limits of social acceleration and by doing so recognise five forms of deceleration. These include: • Natural limits of what is physically possible to accelerate, for example the speed of perception and processing in our brains. • Isolated ‘islands’ of cultures apart from society or ‘oases of deceleration’. • Slowdown as an unintended consequence of acceleration, a dysfunctional form of deceleration, for example traffic jam or mental burnout and depression due to the pressures of acceleration (Rosa, 2009). • Intentional forms of social deceleration, for example ideological movements against modernisation, which, he argues, has always been present but with limited effects. Ideological movements in favour of slowness is seen as constituting the ‘backside’ of social acceleration, moving with it rather than against it (Rosa, 2014). Within this category is also the temporary form of intentional deceleration, which offer a ‘pause’ from acceleration (for example through yoga), but with the aim to help you get back into the race with increased success, and hence, enabling further acceleration (Rosa, 2009). • ‘Hyperaccelerated standstill’, the end of modern society, the wheel is spinning too fast to stop, the only way is towards a crash. The view that any real change is no longer possible.
Despite these identified decelerations, Rosa (2009) conclude that these have had only minor impact on the overall tendency of social acceleration. Every deceleration tendency he describes, he also dismisses as a weak force of resistance, a temporal dip or mere paralysation. Rosa (2009) further argues that an alarming consequence of the contraction of the present, on a both individual and societal level, is a lack of meaningful history and future, leading to a perception of time as ‘frozen’ and prone to depression. This can be understood as a feeling that nothing you can do matters and lack of control over both your personal life and society as a whole. This results in endless freedom that you cannot utilise and the full capacity of anything is never realised. The sense of direction and progress, previously seen in the development of modern society, has turned into an aimless frantic motion. In the same way as the personal life has become increasingly difficult to plan for, states are having trouble planning for society, instead ending up with reactionist situational decisions (Rosa, 2009). 24 Regarding the political aspect, Fofiu (2015) argues that there is indeed a possibility for authoritarian governments to take control over the time, for example through enforcing policies on work-hours. However, in liberal governments, Fofiu (2015) explains that time is controlled by the system of capitalism that runs through all political aspects in the current market society. This leads to an unpolitisation of time, and an individual responsibility to manage your own work-family-balance. In this view, the possibilities of change lies in the individual effort to practice more control over their own lives.
3.3 Social Change
Rosa's theory of Social acceleration does not offer much hope for the possibilities of change. Blühdorn (2017), comes to a similar conclusion, arguing that a ‘big push’ would be necessary to achieve social change beyond capitalism, growth and consumerism. According to Blühdorn (2017) , the need and possibility of this is increasingly recognised in the literature, where it makes up attractive ‘narratives of hope’, but which he does not see as plausible at the moment. On the contrary, Blühdorn (2017) argue, in line with Rosa (2009) that the very efforts of deceleration or radical transition may in fact serve as an enabler for the continuation of status quo and the lack of control over social acceleration.
The difficulties of societal change is further explained by Erik Assadourian (2010) as: ‘Human beings are embedded in cultural systems, are shaped and constrained by their cultures, and for the most part act only within the cultural realities of their lives’ (p. 4). The norms, values and practices connected to a certain culture is perceived as a natural part of life, not an intentional choice. However, Assadourian (2010) also argues that the current culture of consumerism has devastating social and ecological consequences, and explains a need for a cultural paradigm shift. For this paradigm shift to occur, norms and values need to change. In regard to the consumerism paradigm, Assadourian (2010) refers to environmental scientist Donella Meadows, who recognises four critical assumptions that needs to be challenged: ‘More stuff makes people happier, perpetual growth is good, humans are separate from nature, and nature is a stock of resources to be exploited for human purposes’ (p. 16).
25 A way of understanding how cultures can change is through the ‘Great Network Approach’ (Assadourian, 2010b, p. 19). In this approach, Cultural Pioneers, those who are able to ‘step out of their own cultural reality enough to critically examine them’ (p. 5) play an important part in influencing not only a certain amount of people, but also the very institutions already in place in society. The idea is that when ‘individuals who internalise new norms and values also actively spread them in their networks’, social change eventually becomes possible (Ibid). Assadourian (2010b) suggests that transforming a culture will take decades, possibly even centuries. This time frame means not only that it will be basically impossible to prove him wrong within his life time, but more importantly, it spreads light on the importance of being able to think about the long term, not just keeping head above the water in the current ‘now’.
Additionally, the powerful effect of stories that people can identify with is further elaborated on by Andrews and Urbanska (2010). They recognise a characteristic story among inspiring people who have started to live more slow and simple as versions of: ‘a corporate employee is stressed, sick and depressed, so he consumes less, quits his job, moves to a smaller house, finds work that is more satisfying, reduces work hours, plants a garden, and begins to work with his local community centre’ (p. 183). This shares many similarities with the narratives of american minimalists analysed by Uggla (2019), and also reflect many of the characteristics identified in the VSL-model described above. Andrews and Urbanska (2010) argue that these stories are probably much more effective in inspiring people to change their lives, than for example hard facts about climate change. Andrews and Urbanska (2010, p. 184) conclude that: ‘VS is at the same time a practice, a philosophy and a method of social change that can help transform consumer cultures by helping people understand that “less is more”’. So in this view, the personal action of transitioning to a slower and more simple lifestyle can be understood as an important piece in achieving a broader social change in favour of environmental and human wellbeing.
Social movements have previously been able to achieve reduced work time and public policy providing health care, vacation, parental leave and reduced work hours (de Graaf, 2010). Sandlin and Walther (2009), studying the voluntary simplicity lifestyle, recognises difficulties regarding the formation of a coherent identity needed for the lifestyle to become a social movement. Alexander et al. (2012) also recognise a divide between people living simple seeing themselves as part of a larger collective ‘social movement’ with the possibility to change current systems and others who are more individualised and prefer to not be part of any system. Also, Uggla (2019) is asking wether 26 minimalism can be understood as a more ‘radical, anti-capitalist movement’ (p. 234). In relation to this, both Uggla (2019) and Meissner (2019) argue that the level of societal critique within minimalism, is rather weak, and therefore do not seem like a substantial contribution to social change. However, Uggla (2019, p. 249) also suggest that ‘the pure number of people’ making personal transitions could eventually have a bigger impact on society, seen as a whole. Lastly, Demaria et al. (2019), focusing on the possibilities of societal change, has collected articles that with a more radical approach, which suggests that changes takes place in and through moments of crisis, rather than through more moderate steps such as ‘transition towns’ or ‘slow cities’.
3.4 Application of the theories
In this thesis, the VSL-model offers a frame for the study of slower lifestyles in terms of values adoption, practices and effects and a chance to improve the understanding of those lifestyles due to the novelty of the model. The theory of Social Acceleration act as a reference for the modern society that slower lifestyles are objecting against. Further, Rosa’s (2009) view of the possibilities of decelerations, together with selected writings on Social Change is discussed in relation to slower lifestyles and their potential role in society.
27 4 Method and Material
As the aim of the current thesis is to gain increased understanding of personal experiences rather than finding objective truths, the methodological approach can be described as interpretivist. As pointed out by Stuart Farthing (2016), it should be acknowledged that the author’s personal values and cultural context has influenced the research topic and the interpretation of the results. The decisions connected to the research design has been guided by the research question and nature of previous research. The study is based on selected writings and recordings from Swedish persons who have or are transitioning to slower and simpler lifestyles, and are sharing their thoughts and experiences online. The method used is a thematic analysis of personal narratives and thoughts, derived predominantly from personal blogs/webpages, but in some cases also from podcasts, further explained below.
4.1 Selection of Study-Persons The selection of study-persons (SP’s) have been found through google, youtube and facebook, as well as through interview podcasts specialised in alternative lifestyles. The selection process could be described as an online variation of the snowballing method. Initially, search phrases such as slow living, simple living, downshifting etc were used in the various channels. A broad range of homepages, facebook pages, youtube-channels, blogs, and podcasts were viewed, read and listened to, in order to detect individuals who was writing or talking about the search for a slower, simpler and more meaningful life. When a source contained material on the theme of slow living, they were further explored. Every time other persons, home pages and organisations with similar ideas were mentioned, those were also visited for evaluation if they should be further explored or not. Interview Podcasts about alternative lifestyles were also listened to as a way of getting introduced to persons that could be of interest for the thesis.
The first criteria was that the persons should have made a transition in their lives towards a slower or more simple way of living. This could include different types of working and living. Another criteria was that the selected person should have a platform online in terms of a blog, homepage or you-tube channel, so that the analysis could be based on their own premises and choice of expression. As many were also running businesses, their platforms sometimes consisted of a combined webpage/web-shop and blog. Another selection criteria was that the chosen blog would 28 be relatively active, and not abandoned since many years back, to ensure some degree of relevance. In one case the study-person had made a fairly recent statement that she was taking an indefinite pause from social media, which can be understood as a step in her lifestyle transition as reducing her commitment, and hence, after she agreed to participate, she was included anyway.
The selection process led to empirical material based on seven study persons. Many of them have varying sources of income such as writing, consulting and creative work. Being present online with many followers makes them sources of inspiration for other, and can hence be argued to be of extra interest when studying lifestyles. In this sense they can also be seen as key persons within a larger tendency of social change.
4.2 Material The final analysis is based on the study-persons own writings in their blog or homepage. Only those persons that had a personal platform (homepage/blog/youtube-channel) and provided personal reflections about their own experiences of living slower was included. In this way, the empirical material of the analysis consists solely of the study-persons own words in writing or audio, and are hence to be considered as primary sources.
In the first stages of working with the material the study-persons, the narratives connected to their lifestyle change were written down. If the study-person appeared in any of the identified alternative lifestyle podcasts, that episode was listened to as an introduction to that person. The whole episode was not transcribed but notes were taken on that information that regarded their lifestyle change. From that first note taking, often a short summary of their lifestyle transition had become visible. Continuing from that, the study-persons published material and blog archives were studied, in search of thoughts, experiences and reflections connected to the research question. An upside of this often richly documented past was the opportunity to find ‘in the moment-thoughts’ that would possibly have been difficult for them to recall afterwards. During this process the narratives of each study-person was enriched and translated. The content of these narratives were then organised around the three overarching themes of lifestyle change, challenges and possibilities, in order to respond to the research question.
29 All references can either be traced to a published text or a note taken from a podcast episode. Direct citations are derived from the original blogpost, with reservation for the author's translation from Swedish to English. Links to all the specific blogposts, articles and podcast episodes that the analysis is based on is collected in a document kept by the author, to enable tracing if need should occur.
4.3 Thematic Analysis The thematic analysis was conducted on the derived narratives developed by the author. Clarke and Braun (2016) describe thematic analysis as characterised by ‘an organic approach to coding and theme development and the active role of the researcher in these processes’ (p. 297). Codes are considered the smallest unit of analysis, aimed at capturing potentially relevant data in relation to the research question. These codes then make up ‘building blocks’ for larger themes that are used to structure the findings (Clarke & Braun, 2016). In the current study, this was done by first highlighting words of extra interest in the narratives, that were describing different aspects of challenges, possibilities in relation to their way of living. As the overarching themes of challenges and possibilities were already defined by the research question, and an introductory description of their lifestyle change was consider relevant for context, these were the three consistent themes decided upon. Sub-categories were then developed from the initial coding, and re-readings with those codes in mind, grouping similar codes into the same under-category.
It is sometimes argued that using a word-count software enables a more neutral way of deriving codes and themes from a text, less dependent on the author's interpretations, and hence ‘generally resulting in greater reliability’ (Guest et al., 2012 p. 9). However, Guest et al. (2012) also comment on the lack of contextual consideration in this method. The current study thus relies more on the author’s interpretations, possibly affecting the credibility of the results, however, the results instead gains from the possibility to put more emphasis on context, and find themes that were discussed in other wordings than expected beforehand. As Guest et al. (2012) explains: If, for example, one was interested in seeing if in-depth interview participants talked about stigma when asked about HIV/AIDS, it is unlikely the actual word “stigma” would be used. People might talk about being shunned by their family or losing their job due to their HIV status while never using the actual term stigma. (p.9)
30 4.4 Limitations An important aspect to remember when analysing the results is to be aware of the extent to which their blogs can also be considered part of their paid work, and hence their situation can differ quite dramatically from the average citizen. Important to note is also that the narratives extracted from the SP’s blogposts is limited to portraying those parts of life that they felt comfortable to share with their readers, as well as limited to that information that were considered relevant by the author, and are thus extremely simplified. This however is not per se different from an interview or survey situation, but is worth pointing out since the character of personal blogs often can be perceived as very personal.
The choice to not make interviews can be considered a limitation as it led to less possibilities for asking specific questions or probing. However, the choice was also a result of the choice of finding study-persons through internet platforms where they often already provided large amounts of published material on experiences and thoughts on their lifestyle transitions available for everyone to read and be inspired from. By not allocating time at preparing and conducting interviews, more time could be spent on throughly going through their own material and relate that material, piece by piece, to the background research and research question. Further, their already produced material could even potentially include more thought behind them than a quick answer to a question. Future studies could however probably gain from an interview situation, spreading light over parts that might not have been portrayed in the current study.
Lastly, the generalisability of the current thesis should be considered limited due to its qualitative character and reasonably few study-persons. However, it does have a potential in offering the research field on slower and simpler lifestyles a glimpse of a missing Swedish perspective. In terms of credibility, a common criteria is that the methods used should be described as transparent as possible which has been the aim of the current chapter.
4.5 Ethical considerations Only material freely published online has been included in the study, hence all information used is information the participants themselves have chosen to make available to the public. However, since the material was published to be viewed in their own channels, or contexts of their own choosing, and this thesis might provide a perspective that changes the format of that information, all 31 of the selected participants were contacted before inclusion in the study, and will be treated anonymously. However, considering the public character of their internet platforms, they were informed that a risk remained that they might be possible to identify even though their names and other obvious personal information are excluded in the thesis. Further, they were also informed that the thesis would be written in english, and hence, any citation comes with reservation for the author’s translation.
As there are both upsides and downsides in regard to contacting the study-persons and asking for permission to include internet material in a study, guidance and support in the decision was found through Kalman and Lövgrens (2019) writings on internet research ethics, and in discussion with the supervisor. A positive side of taking contact is that it ensures the participants consent of the study and also enables clarifications or follow up questions, although that opportunity was not used in the current study. A potential downside of taking contact could be if it makes the person feel watched or causing them to angle the produced material. In terms of affecting the material, that was not considered an issue in the current study, as most of the material was collected before contact was made. Hopefully, being approached did not cause any feelings of unease either, although difficult to know for sure. The final evaluation was that much of the information used in this study are closer to the character of a conversation than a public text, in line with Kalman and Lövgrens (2019) reasoning, and hence the decision was made to ask the participants for permission to use their writings and recordings in the thesis. After the decision was made to seek permission, three persons were excluded from the study as no response was received, leaving a total of seven study- persons for the final analysis.
32 5 Findings & Analysis
This chapter will present the study-persons (SP’s) narratives, thoughts and experiences of living slower and simpler. Their experiences are structured around the themes of their lifestyle change, challenges and possibilities. The findings connected to their lifestyle change will be discussed in relation to the values, triggers and practices in the VSL-model and the theory of social acceleration, with the aim to understand the preconditions for a personal change. The findings connected to challenges will be discussed in relation to barriers in the VSL-model and difficulties connected to social change. The findings connected to possibilities will be discussed in relation to enablers and effects in the VSL-model, and the thoughts lifted in the theoretical framework of how social change can indeed occur.
5.1 Lifestyle Change
First, the findings connected to the SP's previous lifestyles and what initiated their lifestyle change is discussed in relation to the prior values and triggers recognised in the VSL-model. Connections are drawn to Rosa’s theory of social acceleration and its role in individual life experiences in modern society. Second, the findings connected to the SP's new lifestyles is discussed in relation to the values and practices found in the VSL-model. Connections are drawn to Rosa’s description of possible decelerations.
Previous Lifestyle When the participants in the current study described their lives before their lifestyle transition, it was often characterised by stress and pressure and a feeling of running through life without any time for reflection. The norms and values that guided their lives before the lifestyle change were often achievement oriented, career driven, and led by other’s expectations. Not everyone was explicitly unhappy, but in several cases feelings of meaninglessness, fatigue, depression and burnout syndrome was experienced. Examples of how the SP's are describing their life prior to their lifestyle change:
When I was younger I could never believe life would be this meaningless and achievement oriented … I expected working would be a part of life, not life itself. (SP1, author’s translation)
33 We were both working a lot, surrounded by consumption pressure, driven by a wish to make a career and earn a lot of money … put shortly, me and SP5 did not have time to exchange many words during the weeks. Our attitude towards consumption were completely different … and a total absence of time for reflection. (SP6, author’s translation)
I've grown so used to being served with impressions, that I've missed my own thoughts and reflections. (SP7, author’s translation)
These descriptions of life is coherent with Rosa's (2009) explanation of social acceleration, especially in regard to the pace of life. The mental fatigue could also be understood as an example of a dysfunctional unintentional consequence of acceleration, when the brain suddenly stands still. Thus, the way Rosa (2009) portray the modern society resonates with the experiences from the participants before they made their lifestyle change, and can be seen as representing the ‘before’ part of the VSL-model by Osikominu and Bocken (2020).
The adoption process, as described in the VSL-model, included triggers, enablers and barriers. A common trigger for almost all of the participants in the current study was feelings of stress, many of them experiencing fatigue or burnout syndrome. A common contributing factor was their job situation. Their job took up too many hours of the day, was not meaningful or satisfying, and the feeling of pressure and expected achievements were overhauling. This is in line with Osikominu and Bockens (2020) suggestion that external triggers often sparked an internal trigger. In the current study, most of the participants made a lifestyle change based on mental health motives, stemming from their experiences of stress, pressure and perceived lack of time. One person, SP7, reported more purely environmental motivators, as he stopped believing in green growth and technical development as a solution for sustainable societies. Many others also expressed concern about environmental issues, especially in the sense of being critical against consumption.
In terms of values, the VSL-model conclude that the previous lifestyle usually is characterised by achievement value and suppressed values of self-direction and stimulation. The prior value of achievement was evident in many of the cases in the present study. For example, SP5 explains how her perception of what is meaningful has changed, from academic achievements to just ‘pottering around the garden watching the bees’. However, the findings of the current study indicate that the
34 value of achievement, although less important, often remains in their lives, unwanted, and in need to deal with. This is further discussed under the theme Challenges.
Suppressed self-direction was mainly found in the current study as the SP’s often describes their previous lives as guided by expectations from others, mainly in terms of education, career and being successful, thus closely linked to the achievement value. A common ground for all the SP’s is further that they decided to start valuing their time more, also representing the VSL-value of self- direction, which was previously suppressed.
New Lifestyle The way towards making a change was often inspired by research into other ways of life and/or environmental issues. SP1 describes her lifestyle change as a search for her ‘inner compass’. Generally, all SP's started to reflect more over what they really wanted out of life. This resulted in that the SP's begun to live a life more in tune with their values. SP2 explains that now she is more guided by her feelings than others expectations.
According to the VSL-model by Osikominu and Bockens (2020), the logical sequence of the voluntary simplicity lifestyle is that less work leads to more free time and less income, which in turn leads to less and different consumption, as shown previously in Figure 1. When it comes to work in the current study, many of the SP’s chose to be self employed, which gave them more control over their time, but the actual amount of work often increased initially, especially before they managed to get more established. Some also chose to work more and save more money as a first step towards being able to slow down and reduce their income.
In terms of income, at least some of the SP’s describe how their income sunk when they resigned, started working less or started their own business. Regardless of known or unknown income however, the majority of SP’s still reduced their costs of living. Interesting to note is that SP3 explains how she begun her lifestyle change based on economic reasons much earlier than her actual value change in terms of adopting a minimalistic view of consumption. When she first reduced her income and started her business, she continued to consume, but changed to second hand, which costed less money. Now, however, she considers owning a large amount of ‘stuff’ as disturbing per se. Hence, the aspect of less and different consumption is not necessarily as a result
35 of the reduced income, but also a result of finding out what they considers important in life and beginning to live accordingly.
In regard to consumption, three participants tried the strategy of aiming for a year of ‘buying nothing’ in order to test their limits and be more aware of what they actually needed in life. This choice was, at least for SP1 & SP3 accompanied by a ‘clean up’ and simultaneous reduction of their material assets. Almost all of the SP’s became more conscious about the way they consumed, frequently asking themselves what they really want or need. Their conscious consumption also resulted in more frugality, taking care of their material assets more, fixing instead of throwing, buying second hand rather than new, and when something new was needed, valuing quality and duration more than a low price. All in all, the SP’s new consumption habits were well living up to the VSL-models assumption about less consumption and different consumption.
In terms of free time, the SP's often chose to spend more time on practical tasks and manual labour. SP1 explains that she wants to stay in contact with life through physical activities such as chopping wood and digging in the garden, instead of mere theoretical work in front of a computer. Similarly, SP5 and SP6 have both found a new passion for gardening, and SP5 describes the feeling she gets from gardening as ‘being alive’. Also SP4 enjoys spending more time on ‘real tasks’ and explains, in regard to working on the farm that:
What attracts me, and many others, the most is probably the chance to get your hands dirty with something tangible and concrete. To, in a time dominated by money and other abstract values, be able to do something that directly corresponds to our basic needs. Food to eat. Housing that protects. Wood that heats. Things that very few today ever get the chance to experience hands on. (SP4, author’s translation)
Moreover, many also enjoy spending more time in nature. SP2 describes the feeling she gets from being in nature as ‘being able to breath again’ and express concern over the fact that society's connection to nature is declining, because ‘how can we live without breathing?’. The way the SP’s portray their new lifestyles reveal a sense of increased connection to life itself. This is further found in SP2’s description of her search for ‘less stress and more life’ and SP4’s expression of how he is ‘longing for more life in life’. SP4 concludes that:
36 I've come to the conclusion that the meaning of life is to create more life, in as many ways as possible. (SP4, author’s translation)
An important aspect, connected to the SP's descriptions of their lifestyles, is the practice of Mindfulness, or being present in the moment. SP4 describes how he “stumbled” over mindfulness during hunting. Just sitting in nature with his senses open to the surrounding sounds, trying to detect any movement, turned out to be “mental training in ‘being present’”. SP2 describes the feeling of rain on her cheek and the taste of the apple on her morning walk. A common finding among the SP’s was their habits of paying attention to the simple aspects of life and appreciating the small things, in their efforts to slow down and simplify their lives. In conclusion, most practices recognised among the SP's in the current study are also coherent with the identified practices in the VSL-model by Osikominu and Bockens (2020).
If Rosa’s (2009) description of social acceleration is similar to the SP’s previous lifestyle experiences, often with the negative version of ‘unintended deceleration’ as a result, how could their transitions to slower lifestyles be understood within Rosa's (2009) theory? A suggestion would be the ‘intentional deceleration’ exemplified by social movements and ‘pauses from the race’. Rosa (2009) describes yoga, mindfulness, and other intentional ways of slowing down as a pause, with the aim to get you back into the race again. However, in the present study, all SP’s seem to have more permanent and throughly lifestyle changes in mind than a mere pause and no-one stated that they perceived their new lifestyle as temporary. Is it then to be understood as a social movement, offering only resistance of minor importance? In Rosa’s view, maybe.
To some extent, it could be argued that the slower pace was chosen in order to be able to handle the rush of society. Further, many of the participants in this study expressed a relaxed approach towards life decisions, especially pointing at the possibilities of changed circumstances and a change of mind in the future. This opens up for the possibility that their lifestyle choice might not be as permanent as intended at the moment.
To further understand the probability of long term changes, the following chapters will dig deeper into the challenges and possibilities that the SP’s have experienced connected to their new lifestyles.
37 5.2 Challenges
The SP’s in the current study have to varying degrees met challenges during their attempts to live slower and simpler. Most challenges could be attributed to social and societal norms concerning the norm of working full-time (including the norm of being busy), prevailing achievement values, living outside the norm and searching for community. Other challenges were in terms of consumption, transportation and infrastructure.
Challenge 1: Norm of working full-time SP4 reflects over the ‘sickness of the full-time norm’ together with a friend who came to visit spontaneously for a coffee, and concludes that: ‘If we also worked full-time, we probably would have ended up like so many others these days - hitting the famous wall’. In order to provide the individual with more control over his own time, SP4 request, instead of ‘right to full-time’, higher lowest salaries, less differentiation in salaries and ‘right to part-time’. He looks critically at how the quest for equality between men and women was handled in order to free women of their chains to the home as housewives, arguing that making the man’s priorities the ideal was a devastating mistake: Two generations ago most families could live well on one full-time job, the wife could be home full-time. One generation ago it was common for the woman in a family to work half-time. Today the norm is that both should be working full-time … A better way would have been to make half-time the norm. Sharing paid work and house hold work equally. (SP4, author’s translation)
Also SP7 express critical views against society in regard to the full-time norm and the overall economic system: Sometimes I get frustrated. We have built a system that demands so much time … and is dependent on our consumption … everyone is expected to work full-time 40 hours / week. We need to be more flexible. For those with a family, enough time and health is a scarcity. (SP7, author’s translation)
These reasonings shows that many of the SP’s in the current study indeed carry high levels of societal critique. This is contrary to the criticism against minimalism brought up by Meissner (2009), but in line with the findings of Osikominu & Bocken (2020), who notice that voluntary simplifiers generally have negative perceptions against the economy and society. Previous research also show mixed findings in terms of slower lifestyles and societal criticism. The current study find 38 societal criticism from most of the participants, but most explicitly from SP4, SP5, SP6 & SP7. The challenge becomes how to manage these societal norms on a personal level, as these structures are outside the control of an individual person. Even though many express negative attitudes towards the current system of society, they have to find ways in which they can still be a part of that same society that they would like to see change.
As explained above, society today is designed around the full-time employment, which has both social and economic consequences. Socially, the norm of full-time can lead to difficulties finding time in friends calendars. SP4 comments that if his friend would have been working full-time, like most people, ‘we would not be sitting here having coffee right now’. Further, SP3, reflecting on norms and time, concludes that: ‘being busy’ has become standard mode for most people and also a sign of being important. SP5 comes to a similar conclusion:
Having lots of things to do and a jam-packed agenda is a status-symbol in this day and age. We’re taught that busy equals successful. (SP5, original writing)
As SP3 recognises many negative consequences of living stressful, she is consciously trying to value her time more, and reduce her amount of commitments. However, even though she has now managed to ‘create’ more time in her own life, that enables her to be spontaneous and value spending time on relationships, most friends still have busy calendars. The general standard of being busy thus results in limited possibilities of spending more time with friends, if those friends are still living a mainstream lifestyle characterised by busyness. Consequently, the norm of full-time employment substantially contributes to the busy schedules of friends and relatives, further hindering more time spent together.
Economically, the norm of full-time can make it difficult to work less, even if one would want to. The difficulties connected to living on less money can in turn effect wellbeing negatively and cause worry about money. An important issue for SP1 in both her previous and current lifestyle is the economic stress. Her experiences portray a dilemma where one either works a lot, and hence has enough money to live comfortably, but are too stressed or sick to enjoy that money. The alternative is to work less, have more time and energy, but again constantly need to worry about ones income. To solve this issue, many SP’s started to drastically reduce the money they spent. Some also aims at
39 being more self sufficient to varying degrees, to reduce their dependency on the system, increase their resilience and even further reduce their expenses.
Challenge 2: Prevailing achievement values In this study most participants had reached a point where they viewed other’s opinions as less important than before, placing more value in following their own path. However, in some cases, the achievement values were still present, accompanied by a fear of failure. These feelings could result in difficulties in setting their own boundaries, for example in regard to work. For instance, SP2 who is self-employed and working from home, explains that she finds it difficult to give herself permission to go outside before work is done, even though she knows it would make her feel so much better to go out in nature. Reflecting of her role as a blogger, SP2 finds that: ‘I still get the sometimes agonising urge to produce, achieve, make new new new’. Also SP5 sometimes experience stress and pressure from herself connected to her blog, describing thoughts as ‘my mind starts to go in circles in an attempt to come up with the best and most interesting blog post ever’. SP5 can struggle with feelings of failure from not achieving what she originally set out to ‘be’ (a veterinarian, engineer or lawyer). She also generally struggle with anxiety related to performance. Even though these feelings overall has started to play a less important role in her life, a part of her being scared of failure is still there, and sometimes it makes her not even try, because ‘if you don’t try you can’t fail’. A continuous challenge also for SP6 is to dare to fail, and realising that it sometimes might even be necessary, as ‘Being too scared of failing hinders you from going after your dreams and living the life you truly wants’. SP6 also has a fear of failing with their lifestyle on the countryside, with low incomes and growing much of their own food, explaining that:
I'm scared that we will not be able to live this way, that I will go back to be an engineer, having forgot how you do it. I forget more and more every year. (SP6, original audio)
Also SP1 describes how she feels pressure to succeed in her new lifestyle, especially in terms of sustaining the family economically. These explanations suggest that even if the SP’s intentions are to live a slower and simpler life on a long term basis, there are emotional challenges to the possibility of slowing down, closely tied to a prevailing feeling that you should succeed, and the economic pressure.
40 But should achievement value really be eradicated? Those moments when the SP’s describe intense feelings of joy often comes from overcoming a challenge - participating in that race (SP5), making those vegetables grow (SP5) or taking that camera out at sunset instead of staying inside (SP2). SP2 describes her most recent struggle of crossing the threshold:
I almost did not even take the camera out that evening. I had been out for a walk and felt “wow, the light right now is magical!”. But as soon as I got inside I became lazy, thinking “nah, it’s not so special”. (SP2, author’s translation)
This time she managed to persuade herself to go out anyway, and she describes how the results indeed became ‘magical’ and filled her with a feeling of euphoria. Similarly, but in terms of more extreme efforts, SP5 describes the 90 kilometre long trail run ‘Ultravasan’:
It is truly a magical experience, even if you ask yourself a couple of times down the road what on earth you are doing. (SP5, author’s translation)
So, maybe a life completely without pressure and achievements is not something to wish for. But most importantly, a life completely absorbed in pressure is certainly not good for anyone. As the SP’s have started to reflect more over their priorities, they become more able to choose what achievements are worth striving for, and which ones that merely stem from others expectations.
Challenge 3: Living outside the norm & searching for community In terms of social life, beginning to question what other takes for given can create a feeling of distance to other people. SP3 explains that having a lifestyle that stands out from the norm, in this example by not drinking alcohol, can make her feel different and rather lonely in some contexts. She reflects over how other people can experience different behaviour as a threat, and actively try to change that person, and believes it is simply human nature to want to ‘fit in’. In regard to social norms, SP1 explains how she can feel boring among her friends when she turns down a restaurant visit or other expensive activities. Further, SP1 also reflects over the function of community, and explains that she considers community to be an essential part in finding happiness. She notes that:
We in society has become so lonely our quest for self-realisation. How can we find community again? (SP1, author’s translation)
41 In their lifestyle change the SP’s have left aspects of the norm-life behind, trying to break free from expectations that does not mix with their values. But for their transition to become sustainable, an important part is to either find new peers, community and contexts, or being able to influence their previous context enough to not be completely lonely. SP4 describes his move to the countryside with his family as ‘moving into a context’ and insists that building resilience is not something you do by yourself but in community with others. Many of the SP’s have searched for community and contacts with similar values online. Their engagement in discussion groups and sharing their lifestyle change online can in this sense also be understood as a search for inclusion and a feeling of belonging. Many of SP’s are also happy in their own company, but still enjoy connections with likeminded people. SP5 explains that she and SP6 found their community through trail running:
We’re not the ones to surround ourselves with a lot of people, and often feel like there aren’t that many we can spend an extended period of time with before we start to crave alone-time, but in the trail running community, we’ve found quite awesome people in whose company we both thrive. There’s something so unifying in battling the challenges of a trail race together, and the nature of the sport certainly brings people with plenty of things in common – the love for nature, above all. (SP5, original writing)
Finding community could, in regard to the hardships of living outside the norm, be what is needed for their lifestyle change to be sustainable on a personal level. Additionally, Assadourian (2010) suggests that in order to achieve broader social change, cultural pioneers who are able to step outside the norm and influence others are crucial. In this way, the SP’s ability to find community and influence others would also strengthen their role as cultural pioneers, increasing the possibility of a larger movement.
Challenge 4: Ethical dilemmas Many of the SP’s have become more conscious about their consumption, aiming to consume less, more ethically and more sustainably. But in terms of consumption choices it is neither always easy to make the ‘right’ choice, nor even knowing what the ‘right’ choice is. SP5 explains that with consciousness came feelings of guilt and anxiety, as an unwanted consequence of having started to reflect more. She sometimes think about how easy it was when she did not think about the ethical consequences of her consumption. For others the challenge of consumption came more from economic issues, finding it difficult to combine with their simultaneous attempt to reduce their expenses. Most SP’s however seems to agree that the balance lies in avoiding unnecessary shopping 42 as long as possible, and in real need of something new, choose as ethical as possible. But even though increased reflection favour sustainable consumption, the question also seems to become how much you can reflect over a certain product before you loose your mind.
Challenge 5: Transportation and Infrastructure The challenging aspects of transportation and infrastructure is closely connected to life on the countryside. The SP's who have chosen to live outside the cities to come closer to nature and calmness, have to varying degrees expressed both mental and physical challenges of ‘being far away from everything’ (SP2). SP1 recognises difficulties in terms of transportation in relation to trying to reduce her ecological footprint:
We live on the countryside far from buses so we are dependent on the car. i will try to plan my trips more, carpool and avoid flying. (SP1, author’s translation)
On the same theme, SP4, who also lives on the countryside, argues that people on the countryside are becoming more and more car-dependent:
A few decades back, our little village had a grocery store, a school and a kinder garden. Even when we moved here, we could still take the bicycle to a pre-school 5 kilometres away, but that one is now closed, in line with the trend of centralisation … by closing a school the municipality can save money, but the cost of living on the countryside rises for the citizens who have to travel longer distances. (SP4, author’s translation)
Additionally, SP7, argues that political initiatives should focus on making it easier to be climate friendly, suggesting for example that carpooling would do even more good on the countryside where the distances are longer, than in the inner cities where they are currently more available. These experiences are also reflected in the findings of the VSL-model as the barrier of suitable transportation.
Summary According to the VSL-model, external barriers had most significant impact on the possibilities of adopting a simpler lifestyle. As shown above, this was mostly the case in the current study as well, in regard to social norms/community, employment, consumption and transportation/infrastructure. The exception was prevailing achievement values that could stand in the way for slower values if 43 given too much attention. In conclusion, many challenges turned out to also be possibilities, such as finding a community of like minded people. Some challenges were more in line with pure dilemmas, and were often dealt with through trying to find a balance rather than finding a solution that eradicates the problem. Interestingly those challenges was not given a lot of attention in the analysed material. This could maybe partly be explained by SP5’s note that it is indeed easier to write about hardships after you have gone through them compared to when you are in it.
5.3 Possibilities
Finding Time SP3’s efforts to stop consuming led to improved opportunities of saving money, as buffer for the company. She has arrived to a place where she no longer feel the urge to consume. She explains that once you release a little bit of time, the chances of making better and more sustainable decisions rise, creating a positive circle. SP2 explains that one way she is finding more time is through the opportunity to be her own boss and she aims at making her work as ‘place-independent’ as possible, thus removing time wasted on traveling and commuting. According to SP5, ‘learning to reduce your living costs’ is crucial for making it easier to work less, and consequently improving both your mental health and environmental sustainability. SP5 describes how she and SP6 are more in charge over their own time now, explaining that: ‘Our days are filled with projects - but the agenda is ours, and the opportunities for recovery are endless’. She further suggests that the possibility to find balance in life is considerably improved by following the advice: ‘whatever you do a lot of, make sure to also do the opposite’. SP5 and SP6 both realised that they don’t need much in terms of material and economic wealth to be happy. Their preference for simplicity grew stronger, and so did their valuation of time more than money. SP5 explains that: ‘we have an innate need for peace and quiet to reset and recharge’. In their view, the simple life is really about other things than economic gains or losses. SP5’s perception of what is meaningful has changed, from academic achievements to just ‘pottering around the garden watching the bees’. She believes a key question to consider in finding life satisfaction is ‘how would you live life if no-one was watching?’. This is in line with SP3 (and most other SP’s) who say that the most important aspect is to reflect over how you want to live your life. Many of the SP’s agree that in order to find the courage to change your life, it helps if you can make decisions that are grounded in your feelings:
44 If something feels, good it is right. And if you later on change your mind, that is right as well. (SP2, author’s translation)
Do not be afraid to take the wrong decision. If it feels right it is right. You can always change your mind. Circumstances can change and so can decisions. (SP3, author’s translation)
Connecting these experiences to the VSL-model, and their category of enablers some similarities are emerging. The internal enablers for their lifestyle change in the current study was evident through increased reflection over ones own consumption patterns, often including making clearer priorities regarding time, money, possessions, experiences and relationships.
Social Life SP1 has found new ways to socialise, and try to suggest alternatives to activities that cost money, for example taking a walk by the river and bringing ‘fika’ (something to eat and drink) from home. SP7 also advocates for focusing more on the alternatives than of what you say no to. SP1’s friends have also been inspired by her shop-stop and some started to cut their own expenses as-well. SP1 further describes how beautiful experiences of meeting new people have occurred. She has started asking more often on Facebook to borrow things and received a lot of positivity, and even new friends. An example was when she posted a question asking if anyone had gear for preparing wool to lend her, and ended up spending a whole day crafting with a friend she only met two times before. She has also started to exchange things with friends - homegrown crops, massages and haircuts to name some. These examples shows that there are opportunities connected to living slower and simpler in terms of meeting new people and finding ways of socialising that is less dependent on money and consumption.
These experiences can be connected to the external enablers recognised in the VSL-model. Some participants in the current study reported meeting new like-minded people being an important part of their new lifestyle. However, in most cases, new relationships seem to have had more of an additional effect, not being the main driver of enabling their lifestyle change, except for SP5 and SP6 who made their transition after meeting each other.
Intrinsic Values SP2 explains that she needed the time in the city to understand she preferred to live in the middle of nature. Living in the city, even if nature was close, she describes as like ‘looking at nature through 45 the window’ instead of really experience it and be part of her surrounding. SP5 describes living close to nature and its seasons as grounding, decompressing and healing. SP6 explains how living this close to nature makes him reflect more over things like biodiversity and pollination. In the city, you are not really reminded of those things. I have started to appreciate the life and function of insects. Almost all of the SP’s describe how important their connection to nature has become, and maybe always has been. If accepting Rosa’s theory of modernity, and our distancing from nature as a part of that, the SP’s ‘return’ to nature can really be understood as a deceleration.
SP1 further explains that she has been more creative since she begun her ‘shop-stop’, even cooking has become more creative, as she is working much more based on what she already have at home and ‘limits spur creativity’. SP1 further describes how the decision to stop her subscription on streaming-services has given her more time for various crafts. All in all, the possibilities of living slower and simpler as recognised among the SP’s do tangent the effects recognised in the VSL- model in terms of improved wellbeing, pro-social and pro-environmental effects. Educational aspects could also be found, mainly in terms of getting to know yourself better, and learning new practices and crafts, such as gardening for SP5 and SP6 for instance.
Winds of change The majority of the SP’s in the current study has recognised trends that can be described as a new ‘green wave’, and some of those who begun their lifestyle changes many years ago are feeling less alone in their lifestyle today. After moving to Sweden, SP6 has gained the feeling that individual choices actually matter. He also thinks that there could be even greater opportunities for a broader sustainable transition in society if men would catch up with women in terms of living sustainable and inspire other men to do the same, especially since men are still dominating in decision making positions. The other man in the current study, SP4, have similar solutions as SP5 lifestyle wise, but he considers it more as a function of dealing with the crisis that the world is slowly moving into. Or maybe we just caught some speed, due to the ongoing pandemic? Time will tell. As SP4 note:
Those people living in Rome in the 4th century… were hardly aware that they were witnessing their civilisation’s collapse. It was nothing unusual with their money slowly losing its worth, smaller and smaller yields or the permanent chaos in politics. The fact that it was a collapse became obvious only afterwards. (SP4, author’s translation)
46 6 Conclusions
The current study aimed at increasing the understanding of slower and simpler lifestyles from a Swedish perspective, with a special focus on the individual challenges and possibilities of making a personal lifestyle transition in this direction. In terms of understanding the characteristics of slow and simple living in a Swedish context, the newly developed model of the Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle in terms of values, adoption, practices and effects, was used as a framework for comparison. The current study could most prominently confirm that the VSL-practices identified in the VSL-model were also applicable to the SP’s in the Swedish context. Common characteristics were a previous lifestyle filled with stress, pressure, and living according to other’s expectations. Their new slower and simpler lifestyles were first and foremost a decision to follow their own path in life and start to value their time more. The transition was often enabled through drastically reducing their expenses, making it possible to work less and find more time for what they value most in life. Other commonalities were an increased appreciation for the small things in life, essentially experience the feelings of life instead of rushing through. In most cases there were also an increased feeling of connection to nature.
The insights from the participants in the present study further revealed challenges and possibilities for individuals in Sweden to transition to a slower and simpler way of living. The first challenge was connected to the norm of working full-time, which had both economic and social consequences. Secondly, prevailing achievement values were a challenge for the mental wellbeing of some participants, causing anxiety and a feeling that they should preform better than they do. The challenge of living outside the norm were experienced by most of the participants, but they also seem capable of handling this, partly from being grounded in their own values, and also from finding a community with likeminded. Ethical dilemmas were experienced in regard to consumption, where their general efforts of keeping their costs down sometimes were difficult to combine with choosing ethical products of high quality in accordance with their values. This challenge was somewhat solved through reducing their overall consumption, making it possible to spend more on certain occasions, or pay a bit extra for organic and fair-trade food products. The fifth and last challenge in the current study was transport and infrastructure, mainly for those living on the countryside. This challenge was difficult to overcome as they experienced a continuous reduction of services available within bicycle distance, making them more dependent on the car than they would want. 47 The possibilities recognised by the participants were most prominently concerning their wellbeing, and potential for pro-environmental effects, even though effects in regard to social life and education were also found. The possibility of finding more time were closely connected to their wellbeing as it allowed room for recovery. Social life appeared both in regard to challenges and possibilities, and could be seen as a key aspect in strengthening their position as Cultural Pioneers in the Great Network Approach. In regard to broader social change, many were experiencing tendencies of more people adopting similar views on life as themselves.
6.1 Contribution of the thesis As pointed out earlier, there possibilities of drawing general conclusions from the current theses are limited do to its qualitative character and sample size. However, it contributes with a Swedish perspective to the research field on efforts to transition to more sustainable lifestyles, in regard to the concepts of slow living, voluntary simplicity, downshifting and minimalism. Further, the model of voluntary simplicity lifestyles were in many ways applicable to the current results, contributing to the credibility of the VSL-model.
6.2 Future Research A reflection in the current study is that there seems to be a quite clear majority of females attempting a slower lifestyle. Some argue that women generally are more prone to fatigue and burnout syndrome, a possible reason being their high ambitions, role of organising in the family, and at the same time pressure to make a career. This could be an interesting aspect to look into further. There are also questions remaining in terms of how large any ‘slow movement’ can be estimated to be. Quantitative studies in this regard could serve as a complement to the existing qualitative ones.
48 Afterthoughts
All participants in this study have in common that they have taken a conscious decision to take control over their own time and their own life. But how can more people actually be able to make this decision? Mainstream lifestyle provide very limited room for reflecting on how you want to live your life, at least if you are a low income earner with a family to take care of. You have to at least release a little bit of time to begin with, and that can be quite difficult with a full schedule. So an important question for the sustainability of society becomes, how do we make it possible for people to find the time to reflect over their own lives, before they become sick or too stressed to function? Many of the participants repeatedly mentions the importance balance and recovery. Real recovery, not scattered patches of taking a breath. Can we make recovery a part of society's rhythm?
49 References
Adamo, A. (2019). Jag förstår inte ekonomin i att köra slut på personalen. Tidningen Äldreomsorg, #2 2019. Available at:
Alcott, B. (2008). The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics, 64(4), 770-786.
Alexander, S., & Ussher, S. (2012). The Voluntary Simplicity Movement: A multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(1), 66-86.
Andrews, C., & Urbanska, W. (2010). Inspiring people to see that less is more. In: Assadourian, E., Starke, L., Mastny, L., & Worldwatch Institute. (2010b). State of the world: 2010, transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Assadourian, E. (2010). Transforming Cultures: From Consumerism to Sustainability. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 186-191.
Assadourian, E., Starke, L., Mastny, L., & Worldwatch Institute. (2010b). State of the world: 2010, transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Blühdorn, I. (2017). Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability. Global Discourse: After Sustainability - What?, 7(1), 42-61.
Boström, M (2012) A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8:1, 3-14
Boujbel, Lilia, & D'Astous, Alain. (2012). Voluntary simplicity and life satisfaction: Exploring the mediating role of consumption desires. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(6), 487.
Buhr, K., Isaksson, K., & Hagbert, P. (2018). Local Interpretations of Degrowth—Actors, Arenas and Attempts to Influence Policy. Sustainability, 10(6), 1899.
Buhl, J., & Acosta, J. (2016). Work less, do less? Working time reductions and rebound effects. Sustainability Science, 11(2), 261-276.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology: Qualitative Positive Psychology. Edited by Kate Hefferon and Arabella Ashfield, 12(3), 297-298.
Demaria, F., Kallis, G., & Bakker, K. (2019). Geographies of degrowth: Nowtopias, resurgences and the decolonization of imaginaries and places. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3), 431-450. de Graaf, J. (2010). Reducing work as a path to sustainability. In: Assadourian, E., Starke, L., Mastny, L., & Worldwatch Institute. (2010b). State of the world: 2010, transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
50 Farthing, S. (2016). Research design in urban planning : A student's guide. Singapore: Sage
Fofiu, A. (2015). Perceptions of Time in the Sustainability Movement: The Value of Slow for Sustainable Futures. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Social Analysis, 5(1), 63-79.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M. & Namey, E. E. (2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. In Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. Applied thematic analysis (pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781483384436
INHERIT (2019). Citizen Insights for a Healthier, More Equitable and Sustainable Europe in 2040. Available at:
Jackson, T. (2005). Live Better by Consuming Less?: Is There a “Double Dividend” in Sustainable Consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1-2), 19-36.
Kallis, Giorgos; Kostakis, Vasilis; Lange, Steffen; Muraca, Barbara; Paulson, Susan & Schmelzer, Matthias (2018) Research On Degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 43, pp. 291–316.
Kalman, H., & Lövgren, V. (2019). Etiska dilemman: Forskningsdeltagande, samtycke och utsatthet (Andra upplagan. ed.). Malmö : Gleerups
Kennedy, E., Krahn, H., & Krogman, N. (2013). Downshifting: An Exploration of Motivations, Quality of Life, and Environmental Practices. Sociological Forum, 28(4), 764-783.
Kowalski, K (n.d.) Slow Living 201: A Deep Dive into Slow Living & The Slow Movement, Available at:
Kraisornsuthasinee, S., & Swierczek, F. (2018). Beyond consumption: The promising contribution of voluntary simplicity. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(1), 80-95.
Krogman, N., Kennedy, E., & Krahn, H. (2013). Downshifting: An exploration of motivations, quality of life, and environmental practices. Sociological Forum, 28(4), 764-783.
Lamb, D. (2019). Taking it day-by-day: An exploratory study of adult perspectives on slow living in an urban setting. Annals of Leisure Research, 22(4), 463-483.
Lorenzen, J. (2018). Social Network Challenges to Reducing Consumption: The Problem of Gift Giving. Symbolic Interaction, 41(2), 247-266.
Mangold, S., & Zschau, T. (2019). In Search of the “Good Life”: The Appeal of the Tiny House Lifestyle in the USA. Social Sciences, 8(1), Social Sciences, Jan 2019, Vol.8(1).
Mayer, H., & Knox, P. (2006). Slow Cities: Sustainable Places in a Fast World. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(4), 321-334.
51 Mcguirk, E. (2017). Timebanking in New Zealand as a prefigurative strategy within a wider degrowth movement. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1), 595-609.
Meissner, M. (2019). Against accumulation: Lifestyle minimalism, de-growth and the present post- ecological condition. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 185-200.
Parkins, W. (2004). Out of time: Fast subjects and slow living. Time and Society, 13(2-3), 363-382.
Parkins, W and Craig, G. (2011). Slow living and the temporalities of sustainable consumption. In: Lewis, T and Potter, E. (eds) Ethical Consumption: A Critical Introduction (pp. 189-202). Routledge.
Osikominu, J., & Bocken, N. (2020). A Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle: Values, Adoption, Practices and Effects. Sustainability, 12(5), 1903.
Paulson, S. (2017). Degrowth: Culture, power and change. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1), 425-448.
Rosa, H (2009). Social Acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high speed society. In: Rosa H and Scheuerman W (eds) High-Speed Society: Social Acceleration, Power, and Modernity. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 77– 111.
Rosa, H. (2014). Acceleration, modernitet och identitet : Tre essäer. Göteborg : Daidalos
Sandlin, J., & Walther, C. (2009). Complicated Simplicity: Moral Identity Formation and Social Movement Learning in the Voluntary Simplicity Movement. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(4), 298-317.
Schmid, B. (2019). Degrowth and postcapitalism: Transformative geographies beyond accumulation and growth. Geography Compass, 13(11), N/a.
Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 539-556.
Sundgren, P (2020). Hemtjänst med tid för de äldre - en orimlig lyx? Aftonbladet, 22 April 2020. Available at:
Svenfelt, &., Alfredsson, Bradley, Fauré, Finnveden, Fuehrer, . . . Aretun. (2019). Futures Beyond GDP Growth - Final report from the research program 'Beyond GDP Growth: Scenarios for sustainable building and planning’. KTH School of Architecture and the Built Environment. Available at:
Szollos, A. (2009). Toward a psychology of chronic time pressure: Conceptual and methodological review. Time & Society, 18(2-3), 332-350.
The World Institute of Slowness (n.d.) Vision Statement. Available at: 52
Thoreau, H. D. (1854). Walden. E-book created by Global Grey 2018, Available at:
Uggla, Y. (2019). Taking back control: Minimalism as a reaction to high speed and overload in contemporary society. Sociologisk Forskning, 56(3-4), 233-252.
53