2012 Consumer Security Products Performance Benchmarks (Edition 2) Antivirus and Internet Security Windows 7
November 2011
Document: 2012 Consumer Security Products Performance Benchmarks (Edition 2) Authors: M. Baquiran, D. Wren Company: PassMark Software Date: 14 November 2011 Edition: 2 File: antivirus_12-performance-testing-ed2.docx Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... 2 REVISION HISTORY ...... 4 REFERENCES ...... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 5 OVERALL SCORE ...... 6 PRODUCTS AND VERSIONS ...... 8
INTERNET SECURITY SOFTWARE ...... 8 ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE ...... 8 PERFORMANCE METRICS SUMMARY ...... 9 INTERNET SECURITY SOFTWARE – TEST RESULTS ...... 12
BENCHMARK 1 – BOOT TIME ...... 12 BENCHMARK 2 – SCAN TIME ...... 13 BENCHMARK 3 – USER INTERFACE LAUNCH TIME ...... 14 BENCHMARK 4 – MEMORY USAGE DURING SYSTEM IDLE ...... 15 BENCHMARK 5 – BROWSE TIME ...... 16 BENCHMARK 6 – INTERNET EXPLORER LAUNCH TIME ...... 17 BENCHMARK 7 – INSTALLATION TIME ...... 18 BENCHMARK 8 – INSTALLATION SIZE ...... 19 BENCHMARK 9 – REGISTRY KEYS ADDED ...... 20 BENCHMARK 10 – FILE COPY, MOVE AND DELETE ...... 21 BENCHMARK 11 – INSTALLATION OF THIRD PARTY APPLICATIONS ...... 22 BENCHMARK 12 – NETWORK THROUGHPUT ...... 23 BENCHMARK 13 – FILE FORMAT CONVERSION ...... 24 BENCHMARK 14 – FILE COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION ...... 25 BENCHMARK 15 – FILE WRITE, OPEN AND CLOSE ...... 26 BENCHMARK 16 – PE SCAN TIME ...... 27 BENCHMARK 17 – FILE COPY DISK TO DISK ...... 28 ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE – TEST RESULTS ...... 29
BENCHMARK 1 – BOOT TIME ...... 29 BENCHMARK 2 – SCAN TIME ...... 30 BENCHMARK 3 – USER INTERFACE LAUNCH TIME ...... 31 BENCHMARK 4 – MEMORY USAGE DURING SYSTEM IDLE ...... 32 BENCHMARK 5 – BROWSE TIME ...... 33 BENCHMARK 6 – INTERNET EXPLORER LAUNCH TIME ...... 34 BENCHMARK 7 – INSTALLATION TIME ...... 35 BENCHMARK 8 – INSTALLATION SIZE ...... 36 BENCHMARK 9 – REGISTRY KEYS ADDED ...... 37 BENCHMARK 10 – FILE COPY, MOVE AND DELETE ...... 38 BENCHMARK 11 – INSTALLATION OF THIRD PARTY APPLICATIONS ...... 39 BENCHMARK 12 – NETWORK THROUGHPUT ...... 40 Performance Benchmark Page 2 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
BENCHMARK 13 – FILE FORMAT CONVERSION ...... 41 BENCHMARK 14 – FILE COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION ...... 42 BENCHMARK 15 – FILE WRITE, OPEN AND CLOSE ...... 43 BENCHMARK 16 – PE SCAN TIME ...... 44 BENCHMARK 17 – FILE COPY DISK TO DISK ...... 45 DISCLAIMER AND DISCLOSURE ...... 46 CONTACT DETAILS ...... 46 APPENDIX 1 – TEST ENVIRONMENT ...... 47 APPENDIX 2 – METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION ...... 48
Performance Benchmark Page 3 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Revision History
Rev Revision History Date
Initial version of this report, includes new results for Norton Internet Security 2012, G Data Internet Security 2012, Kaspersky Internet Security 2011, Panda Internet Security Edition 1 11 August 2011 2012, Avast! Internet Security 6, Norton AntiVirus 2012, G Data AntiVirus 2012, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2012, Panda Antivirus 2012 and Avast! Pro Antivirus 6.
Added results for 7 additional Internet Security products and 7 additional Antivirus Edition 2 14 November 2011 products. For more details on these products, see Products and Versions.
References
Ref # Document Author Date
O. Warner, 1 What Really Slows Windows Down (URL) 2001-2009 The PC Spy
Performance Benchmark Page 4 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Executive Summary
PassMark Software® conducted objective performance testing on twelve (12) Internet Security software products and twelve (12) AntiVirus software products on Windows 7 Ultimate Edition (64-bit) SP1 between April 2011 and November 2011. This report presents our results and findings as a result of performance benchmark testing conducted for these consumer security products.
Subsequent editions of this report will include new products released for 2012 as they are made available. For more details on which versions were tested, please see the section “Products and Versions”.
Testing was performed on all products using seventeen (17) performance metrics. These performance metrics are as follows:
Boot Time; Scan Time; User Interface Launch Time; Memory Usage during System Idle; Browse Time; Internet Explorer Launch Time; Installation Time; Installation Size; Registry Keys Added; File Copy, Move and Delete; Installation of Third Party Applications; Network Throughput (previously named “Binary Download Test”) File Format Conversion; File Compression and Decompression; File Write, Open and Close; PE Scan Time and; File Copy Disk to Disk.
Performance Benchmark Page 5 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Overall Score
PassMark Software assigned every product a score depending on its ranking in each metric compared to other products in the same category.
Internet Security Software
In the following table the highest possible score attainable is 204; in a hypothetical situation where a product has attained first place all 17 metrics. Internet Security products have been ranked by their overall scores:
Product Name Overall Score
Norton Internet Security 2012 152
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 131
Avira Internet Security 2012 129
Avast! Internet Security 6 126
AVG Internet Security 2012 123
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 115
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 113
G Data Internet Security 2012 99
Panda Internet Security 2012 95
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 89
McAfee Internet Security 2012 84
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 67
Performance Benchmark Page 6 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Antivirus Software
In the following table the highest possible score attainable is 204; in a hypothetical situation where a product has attained first place in all 17 metrics. Antivirus products have been ranked by their overall scores:
Product Name Overall Score
Norton Antivirus 2012 154
Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2012 129
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 129
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 128
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 124
Microsoft Security Essentials 112
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 106
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 105
AVG Anti-Virus 1012 98
G Data Antivirus 2012 87
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 85
McAfee Antivirus 2012 69
Performance Benchmark Page 7 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Products and Versions
In all cases, we have tested the full, retail release of the newest generation (2012 versions) of security products. The names and versions of products which were tested can be found below from each category table:
Internet Security Software
Manufacturer Product Name Release Year Product Version Date Tested
Symantec Corporation Norton Internet Security 2012 2011 19.1.0.21 Aug 2011
G Data Software AG G Data Internet Security 2012 2011 22.0.2.25 Jun 2011
Kaspersky Lab Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 2011 12.0.0.374 Jun 2011
Panda Security SL Panda Internet Security 2012 2011 17.00.00 Jul 2011
AVAST Software a.s. Avast! Internet Security 6 2011 6.0.1203 Aug 2011
AVG Technologies AVG Internet Security 2012 2011 2012.0.1809 Sep 2011
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Trend Micro Inc. 2011 5.0.1280 Oct 2011 Security 2012
Sourcenext Corporation SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 2011 11.0.0047 Oct 2011
Trend Micro Inc. Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 2011 5.0.1280 Oct 2011
Avira Operations GmbH Avira Internet Security 2012 2011 12.0.0.871 Oct 2011 & Co. KG
BitDefender BitDefender Internet Security 2012 2011 15.0.31.1282 Oct 2011
McAfee, Inc. McAfee Internet Security 2012 2011 11.0.393 Nov 2011
Antivirus Software
Manufacturer Product Name Release Year Product Version Date Tested
Symantec Corporation Norton Antivirus 2012 2011 19.1.0.21 Aug 2011
G Data Software AG G Data Antivirus 2012 2011 22.0.2.25 Jun 2011
Kaspersky Lab Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 2011 12.0.0.374 Jun 2011
Panda Security Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 2011 11.00.00 Jul 2011
AVAST Software a.s. Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 2011 6.0.1203 Aug 2011
AVG Technologies AVG Anti-Virus 2012 2011 2012.0.1809 Sep 2011
Trend Micro Inc. Trend Micro Titanium 2012 2011 5.0.1280 Oct 2011
Avira Operations Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 2011 12.0.0.871 Oct 2011 GmbH & Co. KG
Quick Heal Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 2011 13.00(6.0.0.1) Oct 2011 Technologies (P) Ltd.
McAfee, Inc. McAfee AntiVirus 2012 2011 11.0.623 Nov 2011
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with PC Tools 2011 9.0.0.888 Nov 2011 AntiVirus 9
Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Security Essentials 2011 2.1.1116.0 Nov 2011
Performance Benchmark Page 8 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Performance Metrics Summary
We have selected a set of objective metrics which provide a comprehensive and realistic indication of the areas in which an antivirus may impact system performance for end users. Our metrics test the impact of the antivirus software on common tasks that end-users would perform on a daily basis.
All of PassMark Software’s test methods can be replicated by third parties using the same environment to obtain similar benchmark results. Detailed descriptions of the methodologies used in our tests are available as “Appendix 2 – Methodology Description” of this report.
Benchmark 1 – Boot Time
This metric measures the amount of time taken for the machine to boot into the operating system. Security software is generally launched at Windows startup, adding an additional amount of time and delaying the startup of the operating system. Shorter boot times indicate that the application has had less impact on the normal operation of the machine.
Benchmark 2 – Scan Time
All antivirus solutions have functionality designed to detect viruses and various other forms of malware by scanning files on the system. This metric measured the amount of time required to scan a set of clean files. Our sample file set comprised a total file size of 982 MB and was made up of files that would typically be found on end-user machines, such as media files, system files and Microsoft Office documents.
Benchmark 3 – User Interface Launch Time
This metric provides an objective indication as to how responsive a security product appears to the user, by measuring the amount of time it takes for the user interface of the antivirus software to launch from Windows. To allow for caching effects by the operating system, both the initial launch time and the subsequent launch times were measured. Our final result is an average of these two measurements.
Benchmark 4 – Memory Usage during System Idle
This metric measures the amount of memory (RAM) used by the product while the machine and antivirus software are in an idle state. The total memory usage was calculated by identifying all antivirus software processes and the amount of memory used by each process.
The amount of memory used while the machine is idle provides a good indication of the amount of system resources being consumed by the antivirus software on a permanent basis. Better performing products occupy less memory while the machine is idle.
Benchmark 5 – Browse Time
It is common behavior for security products to scan data for malware as it is downloaded from the internet or intranet. This behavior may negatively impact browsing speed as products scan web content for malware. This metric measures the time taken to browse a set of popular internet sites to consecutively load from a local server in a user’s browser window.
Performance Benchmark Page 9 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 6 – Internet Explorer Launch Time
This metric is one of many methods to objectively measure how much a security product impacts on the responsiveness of the system. This metric measures the amount of time it takes to launch the user interface of Internet Explorer 8. To allow for caching effects by the operating system, both the initial launch time and the subsequent launch times were measured. Our final result is an average of these two measurements.
Benchmark 7 – Installation Time
The speed and ease of the installation process will strongly influence the user’s first impression of the antivirus software. This test measures the minimum installation time required by the antivirus software to be fully functional and ready for use by the end user. Lower installation times represent antivirus products which are quicker for a user to install.
Benchmark 8 – Installation Size
In offering new features and functionality to users, antivirus software products tend to increase in size with each new release. Although new technologies push the size limits of hard drives each year, the growing disk space requirements of common applications and the increasing popularity of large media files (such as movies, photos and music) ensure that a product's installation size will remain of interest to home users.
This metric aims to measure a product’s total installation size. This metric is defined as the total disk space consumed by all new files added during a product's installation.
Benchmark 9 – Registry Keys Added
A large registry increases a machine’s use of resources. This may negatively impact system performance, especially on much older machines. This test measures the amount of keys and values added to registry, after rebooting the test machines, following a successful product installation. Lower numbers mean that a product has added fewer keys during installation and had less impact on the registry.
Benchmark 10 – File Copy, Move and Delete
This metric measures the amount of time taken to move, copy and delete a sample set of files. The sample file set contains several types of file formats that a Windows user would encounter in daily use. These formats include documents (e.g. Microsoft Office documents, Adobe PDF, Zip files, etc), media formats (e.g. images, movies and music) and system files (e.g. executables, libraries, etc).
Benchmark 11 – Installing Third Party Applications
This metric measures the amount of time taken to install and uninstall third party programs. The installation speed of third party applications may be impacted by antivirus behavior such as heuristics or real time malware scanning.
Benchmark 12 – Network Throughput
The metric measures the amount of time taken to download a variety of files from a local server using the HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which is the main protocol used on the web for browsing, linking and data transfer. Files used in this test include file formats that users would typically download from the web, such as images, archives, music files and movie files.
Performance Benchmark Page 10 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 13 – File Format Conversion
This test measures the amount of time taken to convert an MP3 file to a WAV and subsequently, convert the same MP3 file to a WMA format.
Benchmark 14 – File Compression and Decompression
This metric measures the amount of time taken to compress and decompress different types of files. Files formats used in this test included documents, movies and images.
Benchmark 15 – File Write, Open and Close
This benchmark was derived from Oli Warner’s File I/O test at http://www.thepcspy.com (please see Reference #1: What Really Slows Windows Down). This metric measures the amount of time taken to write a file, then open and close that file.
Benchmark 16 – PE Scan Time
All antivirus solutions have functionality designed to detect viruses and various other forms of malware by scanning files on the system. This metric measured the amount of time required to scan a set of PE (Portable Executable) files. Our sample file set comprised a total file size of 2.03GB and consisted of .exe (329MB), .dll (920MB) and .sys files (827MB).
Benchmark 17 – File Copy Disk To Disk
This test measures the amount of time taken to copy files between two local drives. The data set comprised a total file size of 5.44GB, and the formats used included documents, movies, images and executables.
Performance Benchmark Page 11 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Internet Security Software – Test Results
In the following charts, we have highlighted the results we obtained for Norton Internet Security 2012 in yellow. The average has also been highlighted in blue for ease of comparison.
Benchmark 1 – Boot Time
The following chart compares the average time taken for the system to boot (from a sample of five boots) for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower boot times are considered better performing products in this category.
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 27.32
Avast! Internet Security 6 28.95
AVG Internet Security 2012 30.78
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 30.80
Norton Internet Security 2012 31.73
Avira Internet Security 2012 32.61
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 32.91
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 34.10
Panda Internet Security 2012 36.99
Average 37.09
G Data Internet Security 2012 38.21
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 38.51
McAfee Internet Security 2012 82.12
0 s 10 s 20 s 30 s 40 s 50 s 60 s 70 s 80 s 90 s
Performance Benchmark Page 12 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 2 – Scan Time
The following chart compares the average time taken to scan a set of 6159 files (totaling 982 MB) for each Internet Security product tested. This time is calculated by averaging the initial (Run 1) and subsequent (Runs 2- 5) scan times. Products with lower scan times are considered better performing products in this category.
G Data Internet Security 2012 22.50
Norton Internet Security 2012 23.25
AVG Internet Security 2012 25.38
McAfee Internet Security 2012 27.50
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 36.21
Avast! Internet Security 6 36.75
Average 42.62
Avira Internet Security 2012 42.75
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 43.50
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 44.25
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 45.58
Panda Internet Security 2012 75.79
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 88.00
0 s 10 s 20 s 30 s 40 s 50 s 60 s 70 s 80 s 90 s 100 s
Performance Benchmark Page 13 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 3 – User Interface Launch Time
The following chart compares the average time taken to launch a product’s user interface. Products with lower launch times are considered better performing products in this category.
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 31.04
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 32.63
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 90.35
McAfee Internet Security 2012 127.77
G Data Internet Security 2012 241.30
Avast! Internet Security 6 305.06
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 395.00
Average 542.78
Avira Internet Security 2012 789.20
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 790.14
Norton Internet Security 2012 991.78
AVG Internet Security 2012 1,082.47
Panda Internet Security 2012 1,636.60
0 ms 200 ms 400 ms 600 ms 800 ms 1,000 ms 1,200 ms 1,400 ms 1,600 ms 1,800 ms
Performance Benchmark Page 14 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 4 – Memory Usage during System Idle
The following chart compares the average amount of RAM in use by an Internet Security product during a period of system idle. This average is taken from a sample of ten memory snapshots taken at roughly 60 seconds apart after reboot. Products with lower idle RAM usage are considered better performing products in this category.
Avast! Internet Security 6 16.93
Norton Internet Security 2012 24.04
Panda Internet Security 2012 40.30
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 44.37
Avira Internet Security 2012 52.54
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 55.03
Average 56.28
AVG Internet Security 2012 56.50
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 62.49
McAfee Internet Security 2012 71.17
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 80.26
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 85.10
G Data Internet Security 2012 86.60
0 MB 10 MB 20 MB 30 MB 40 MB 50 MB 60 MB 70 MB 80 MB 90 MB 100 MB
Performance Benchmark Page 15 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 5 – Browse Time
The following chart compares the average time taken for Internet Explorer to successively load a set of popular websites through the local area network from a local server machine. Products with lower browse times are considered better performing products in this category.
Avast! Internet Security 6 43.09
Norton Internet Security 2012 44.47
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 47.37
Panda Internet Security 2012 47.65
Avira Internet Security 2012 47.76
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 49.57
AVG Internet Security 2012 53.05
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 60.04
Average 67.23
McAfee Internet Security 2012 84.65
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 89.54
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 92.51
G Data Internet Security 2012 147.03
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s 140 s 160 s
Performance Benchmark Page 16 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 6 – Internet Explorer Launch Time
The following chart compares the average launch times of Internet Explorer after rebooting the machine for each Internet Security product we tested. Products with lower launch times are considered better performing products in this category.
Avira Internet Security 2012 826.63
Norton Internet Security 2012 853.93
AVG Internet Security 2012 860.34
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 889.90
McAfee Internet Security 2012 1,037.22
G Data Internet Security 2012 1,051.27
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 1,061.29
Avast! Internet Security 6 1,082.24
Average 1,126.66
Panda Internet Security 2012 1,414.76
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 1,431.90
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 1,467.79
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 1,542.66
0 ms 200 ms 400 ms 600 ms 800 ms 1,000 ms 1,200 ms 1,400 ms 1,600 ms 1,800 ms
Performance Benchmark Page 17 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 7 – Installation Time
The following chart compares the minimum installation time it takes for Internet Security products to be fully functional and ready for use by the end user. Products with lower installation times are considered better performing products in this category.
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 52.50
AVG Internet Security 2012 52.50
Norton Internet Security 2012 52.50
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 64.90
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 82.70
Panda Internet Security 2012 193.70
Average 202.18
Avira Internet Security 2012 230.50
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 242.30
G Data Internet Security 2012 248.80
Avast! Internet Security 6 264.80
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 309.00
McAfee Internet Security 2012 631.90
0 s 100 s 200 s 300 s 400 s 500 s 600 s 700 s
Performance Benchmark Page 18 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 8 – Installation Size
The following chart compares the total size of files added during the installation of Internet Security products. Products with lower installation sizes are considered better performing products in this category.
Avira Internet Security 2012 172.18
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 233.24
Norton Internet Security 2012 249.54
Panda Internet Security 2012 302.28
Avast! Internet Security 6 339.90
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 450.58
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 485.70
Average 493.88
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 520.30
McAfee Internet Security 2012 529.98
AVG Internet Security 2012 632.78
G Data Internet Security 2012 800.32
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 1,209.82
0 MB 200 MB 400 MB 600 MB 800 MB 1,000 MB 1,200 MB 1,400 MB
Performance Benchmark Page 19 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 9 – Registry Keys Added
The following chart compares the amount of Registry Keys created during product installation for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower key counts are considered better performing products in this category.
Avira Internet Security 2012 1,452.00
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 3,295.00
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 3,529.00
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 4,693.00
AVG Internet Security 2012 4,701.00
Norton Internet Security 2012 4,738.00
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 5,471.00
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 5,478.00
Average 6,180.50
G Data Internet Security 2012 7,226.00
Avast! Internet Security 6 7,270.00
Panda Internet Security 2012 7,690.00
McAfee Internet Security 2012 18,623.00
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
Performance Benchmark Page 20 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 10 – File Copy, Move and Delete
The following chart compares the average time taken to copy, move and delete several sets of sample files for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
G Data Internet Security 2012 24.27
Norton Internet Security 2012 24.57
Avast! Internet Security 6 24.66
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 25.93
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 26.22
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 26.74
Average 29.51
Panda Internet Security 2012 30.01
McAfee Internet Security 2012 30.65
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 32.66
AVG Internet Security 2012 33.33
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 34.71
Avira Internet Security 2012 40.33
0 s 5 s 10 s 15 s 20 s 25 s 30 s 35 s 40 s 45 s
Performance Benchmark Page 21 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 11 – Installation of Third Party Applications
The following chart compares the average time taken to install 3 different third party application for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 94.35
Avira Internet Security 2012 97.21
Panda Internet Security 2012 97.98
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 98.04
G Data Internet Security 2012 100.05
Average 103.46
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 104.55
Avast! Internet Security 6 106.03
Norton Internet Security 2012 107.03
McAfee Internet Security 2012 107.09
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 107.53
AVG Internet Security 2012 110.02
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 111.69
85 s 90 s 95 s 100 s 105 s 110 s 115 s
Performance Benchmark Page 22 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 12 – Network Throughput
The following chart compares the average time to download a sample set of common file types for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 10.47
Avast! Internet Security 6 10.70
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 10.89
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 12.20
McAfee Internet Security 2012 13.23
Norton Internet Security 2012 13.34
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 14.75
Average 18.57
AVG Internet Security 2012 26.26
G Data Internet Security 2012 26.56
Panda Internet Security 2012 32.17
Avira Internet Security 2012 33.73
0 s 5 s 10 s 15 s 20 s 25 s 30 s 35 s 40 s
*Results for Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 could not be obtained as the test was blocked by the software.
Performance Benchmark Page 23 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 13 – File Format Conversion
The following chart compares the average time it takes for five sample files to be converted from one file format to another (MP3 WMA, MP3 WAV) for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
G Data Internet Security 2012 75.69
Avira Internet Security 2012 75.73
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 75.74
AVG Internet Security 2012 75.84
Panda Internet Security 2012 75.99
Norton Internet Security 2012 76.07
McAfee Internet Security 2012 76.20
Average 76.41
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 76.74
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 76.91
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 77.10
Avast! Internet Security 6 77.13
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 77.74
75 s 75 s 76 s 76 s 77 s 77 s 78 s 78 s
Performance Benchmark Page 24 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 14 – File Compression and Decompression
The following chart compares the average time it takes for sample files to be compressed and decompressed for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
AVG Internet Security 2012 78.59
Norton Internet Security 2012 81.66
Avira Internet Security 2012 81.97
G Data Internet Security 2012 82.37
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 82.40
Avast! Internet Security 6 84.44
McAfee Internet Security 2012 85.32
Average 87.20
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 89.29
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 92.57
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 92.68
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 95.49
Panda Internet Security 2012 99.59
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s
Performance Benchmark Page 25 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 15 – File Write, Open and Close
The following chart compares the average time it takes for a file to be written to the hard drive then opened and closed 180,000 times, for each Internet Security product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
AVG Internet Security 2012 17.13
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 26.46
Panda Internet Security 2012 26.64
Norton Internet Security 2012 26.83
Avira Internet Security 2012 27.33
Avast! Internet Security 6 29.97
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 59.29
McAfee Internet Security 2012 64.80
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 66.36
Average 295.64
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 697.21
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 1,054.84
G Data Internet Security 2012 1,450.85
0 s 200 s 400 s 600 s 800 s 1,000 s 1,200 s 1,400 s 1,600 s
Performance Benchmark Page 26 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 16 – PE Scan Time
The following chart compares the average time taken to scan a set of 6351 portable executable files (totaling 2076 MB) for each Internet Security product tested. This time is calculated by averaging the initial (Run 1) and subsequent (Runs 2-5) scan times. Products with lower scan times are considered better performing products in this category
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 30.95
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 44.25
Norton Internet Security 2012 58.00
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 65.24
G Data Internet Security 2012 69.88
McAfee Internet Security 2012 85.25
AVG Internet Security 2012 95.13
Average 95.24
Avira Internet Security 2012 95.38
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 106.63
Avast! Internet Security 6 153.88
Panda Internet Security 2012 168.74
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 169.61
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s 140 s 160 s 180 s
Performance Benchmark Page 27 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 17 – File Copy Disk to Disk
The following chart compares the average time taken to copy a total of 8,501 files, with a total file size of 5.44GB files, from one local drive to another local drive for each Internet Security product tested. The test was performed 5 times, and the average of all 5 runs was taken as the result. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
Avast! Internet Security 6 106.02
Trend Micro Virus Buster 2012 116.24
Norton Internet Security 2012 116.27
AVG Internet Security 2012 120.10
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 121.42
Panda Internet Security 2012 123.42
Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 125.13
Avira Internet Security 2012 128.78
Average 129.87
BitDefender Internet Security 2012 134.47
G Data Internet Security 2012 138.07
McAfee Internet Security 2012 153.42
SourceNEXTstyle ZERO 175.11
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s 140 s 160 s 180 s 200 s
Performance Benchmark Page 28 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Antivirus Software – Test Results
In the following charts, we have highlighted the results we obtained for Norton AntiVirus 2012 in yellow. The average has also been highlighted in blue for ease of comparison.
Benchmark 1 – Boot Time
The following chart compares the average time taken for the system to boot (from a sample of five boots) for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower boot times are considered better performing products in this category.
Microsoft Security Essentials 28.07
Norton Antivirus 2012 29.21
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 29.84
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 30.56
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 32.15
G Data Antivirus 2012 33.18
Average 33.63
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 34.73
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 34.95
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 35.00
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 35.31
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 39.91
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 40.67
0 s 5 s 10 s 15 s 20 s 25 s 30 s 35 s 40 s 45 s
Performance Benchmark Page 29 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 2 – Scan Time
The following chart compares the average time taken to scan a set of 6159 files (totaling 982 MB) for each Antivirus product tested. This time is calculated by averaging the initial (Run 1) and subsequent (Runs 2-5) scan times. Products with lower scan times are considered better performing products in this category
G Data Antivirus 2012 21.88
Norton Antivirus 2012 24.88
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 30.33
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 31.00
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 36.38
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 37.00
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 43.88
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 45.38
Average 46.37
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 47.50
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 49.75
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 71.50
Microsoft Security Essentials 116.96
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s 140 s
Performance Benchmark Page 30 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 3 – User Interface Launch Time
The following chart compares the average time taken to launch a product’s user interface. Products with lower launch times are considered better performing products in this category.
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 37.27
Microsoft Security Essentials 95.04
G Data Antivirus 2012 236.95
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 240.39
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 345.00
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 440.57
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 521.84
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 557.51
Average 655.34
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 801.67
Norton Antivirus 2012 907.21
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 1,346.08
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 2,334.58
0 ms 500 ms 1,000 ms 1,500 ms 2,000 ms 2,500 ms
Performance Benchmark Page 31 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 4 – Memory Usage during System Idle
The following chart compares the average amount of RAM in use by an Antivirus product during a period of system idle. This average is taken from a sample of ten memory snapshots taken at roughly 60 seconds apart after reboot. Products with lower idle RAM usage are considered better performing products in this category.
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 8.75
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 27.62
Norton Antivirus 2012 31.36
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 41.61
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 42.75
Average 51.97
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 55.03
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 55.03
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 55.77
G Data Antivirus 2012 56.80
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 68.57
Microsoft Security Essentials 83.88
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 96.50
0 MB 20 MB 40 MB 60 MB 80 MB 100 MB 120 MB
Performance Benchmark Page 32 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 5 – Browse Time
The following chart compares the average time taken for Internet Explorer to successively load a set of popular websites through the local area network from a local server machine. Products with lower browse times are considered better performing products in this category.
Microsoft Security Essentials 39.57
Norton Antivirus 2012 40.27
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 44.07
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 44.80
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 48.64
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 54.53
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 57.87
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 60.13
Average 78.71
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 85.52
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 87.70
G Data Antivirus 2012 144.07
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 237.38
0 s 50 s 100 s 150 s 200 s 250 s
Performance Benchmark Page 33 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 6 – Internet Explorer Launch Time
The following chart compares the average launch times of Internet Explorer after rebooting the machine for each Antivirus product we tested. Products with lower launch times are considered better performing products in this category.
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 812.60
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 889.12
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 934.80
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 1,004.46
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 1,020.85
Microsoft Security Essentials 1,025.66
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 1,074.64
G Data Antivirus 2012 1,092.61
Average 1,108.40
Norton Antivirus 2012 1,233.80
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 1,300.87
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 1,337.53
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 1,573.84
0 ms 200 ms 400 ms 600 ms 800 ms 1,000 ms 1,200 ms 1,400 ms 1,600 ms 1,800 ms
Performance Benchmark Page 34 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 7 – Installation Time
The following chart compares the minimum installation time it takes for Antivirus products to be fully functional and ready for use by the end user. Products with lower installation times are considered better performing products in this category.
Norton Antivirus 2012 52.50
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 74.40
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 74.90
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 76.00
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 113.00
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 115.20
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 120.60
Average 172.62
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 189.50
G Data Antivirus 2012 201.70
Microsoft Security Essentials 232.20
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 313.80
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 507.60
0 s 100 s 200 s 300 s 400 s 500 s 600 s
Performance Benchmark Page 35 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 8 – Installation Size
The following chart compares the total size of files added during the installation of Antivirus products. Products with lower installation sizes are considered better performing products in this category.
Microsoft Security Essentials 104.53
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 168.67
Norton Antivirus 2012 231.27
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 280.40
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 308.67
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 384.90
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 435.28
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 474.75
Average 475.87
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 572.35
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 795.82
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 924.41
G Data Antivirus 2012 1,029.40
0 MB 200 MB 400 MB 600 MB 800 MB 1,000 MB 1,200 MB
Performance Benchmark Page 36 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 9 – Registry Keys Added
The following chart compares the amount of Registry Keys created during product installation for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower key counts are considered better performing products in this category.
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 1,360.00
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 2,614.00
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 2,886.00
Microsoft Security Essentials 3,273.00
Norton Antivirus 2012 4,222.00
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 4,297.00
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 4,471.00
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 4,727.00
G Data Antivirus 2012 6,288.00
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 6,600.00
Average 7,511.42
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 16,310.00
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 33,089.00
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000
Performance Benchmark Page 37 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 10 – File Copy, Move and Delete
The following chart compares the average time taken to copy, move and delete several sets of sample files for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
Norton Antivirus 2012 24.13
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 24.35
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 25.88
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 26.57
G Data Antivirus 2012 26.86
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 27.53
Average 29.25
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 29.41
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 30.52
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 30.54
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 31.52
Microsoft Security Essentials 33.94
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 39.72
0 s 5 s 10 s 15 s 20 s 25 s 30 s 35 s 40 s 45 s
Performance Benchmark Page 38 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 11 – Installation of Third Party Applications
The following chart compares the average time taken to install a third party application for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 97.21
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 98.24
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 98.40
G Data Antivirus 2012 98.43
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 100.01
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 103.83
Norton Antivirus 2012 104.61
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 106.91
Average 107.50
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 113.23
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 113.59
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 127.75
Microsoft Security Essentials 127.84
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s 140 s
Performance Benchmark Page 39 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 12 – Network Throughput
The following chart compares the average time to download a sample set of common file types for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 9.48
Microsoft Security Essentials 10.59
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 10.76
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 11.18
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 11.48
Norton Antivirus 2012 12.94
Average 13.72
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 15.30
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 16.37
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 16.42
G Data Antivirus 2012 26.06
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 27.35
0 s 5 s 10 s 15 s 20 s 25 s 30 s
*Results for Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2012 could not be obtained as the test was blocked by the software.
Performance Benchmark Page 40 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 13 – File Format Conversion
The following chart compares the average time it takes for five sample files to be converted from one file format to another (MP3 WMA, MP3 WAV) for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 74.92
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 75.65
Norton Antivirus 2012 75.93
Microsoft Security Essentials 76.07
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 76.16
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 76.19
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 76.24
Average 76.38
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 76.89
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 76.92
G Data Antivirus 2012 76.96
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 77.02
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 77.63
74 s 74 s 75 s 75 s 76 s 76 s 77 s 77 s 78 s 78 s
Performance Benchmark Page 41 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 14 – File Compression and Decompression
The following chart compares the average time it takes for sample files to be compressed and decompressed for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 79.14
Norton Antivirus 2012 81.12
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 81.25
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 82.44
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 84.12
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 84.20
Microsoft Security Essentials 84.79
G Data Antivirus 2012 84.88
Average 86.14
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 88.10
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 89.56
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 95.17
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 98.94
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s
Performance Benchmark Page 42 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 15 – File Write, Open and Close
The following chart compares the average time it takes for a file to be written to the hard drive then opened and closed 180,000 times, for each Antivirus product tested. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 18.07
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 22.65
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 23.60
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 24.05
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 26.31
Norton Antivirus 2012 26.78
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 27.13
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 29.19
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 31.09
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 33.67
Average 161.02
Microsoft Security Essentials 238.23
G Data Antivirus 2012 1,431.52
0 s 200 s 400 s 600 s 800 s 1,000 s 1,200 s 1,400 s 1,600 s
Performance Benchmark Page 43 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 16 – PE Scan Time
The following chart compares the average time taken to scan a set of 6351 portable executable files (totaling 2076 MB) for each Antivirus product tested. This time is calculated by averaging the initial (Run 1) and subsequent (Runs 2-5) scan times. Products with lower scan times are considered better performing products in this category
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 15.88
Norton Antivirus 2012 22.88
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 33.63
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 54.63
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 65.89
G Data Antivirus 2012 70.13
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 81.63
Average 82.85
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 84.05
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 95.13
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 152.50
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 155.13
Microsoft Security Essentials 162.73
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s 140 s 160 s 180 s
Performance Benchmark Page 44 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 17 – File Copy Disk to Disk
The following chart compares the average time taken to copy a set of files from one local drive to another local drive for each Antivirus product tested. The test was performed 5 times, and the average of all 5 runs was taken as the result. Products with lower times are considered better performing products in this category.
Trend Micro Titanium 2012 106.79
Microsoft Security Essentials 111.97
Norton Antivirus 2012 116.90
Kaspersky Antivirus 2012 120.42
Avast! Pro Antivirus 6 121.35
Average 126.77
Panda Antivirus Pro 2012 126.80
PC Tools Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus 9 129.01
Avira Antivirus Premium 2012 130.42
AVG Anti-Virus 2012 131.61
Quick Heal AntiVirus 2012 134.52
G Data Antivirus 2012 136.22
McAfee AntiVirus 2012 155.25
0 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 100 s 120 s 140 s 160 s 180 s
Performance Benchmark Page 45 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Disclaimer and Disclosure
This report only covers versions of products that were available at the time of testing. The tested versions are as noted in the “Products and Versions” section of this report. The products we have tested are not an exhaustive list of all products available in these very competitive product categories.
Disclaimer of Liability
While every effort has been made to ensure that the information presented in this report is accurate, PassMark Software Pty Ltd assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or out-of-date information and shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages resulting from the availability of, use of, access of, or inability to use this information.
Disclosure
Symantec Corporation funded the production of this report, selected the test metrics and list of products to include in this report, and supplied some of the test scripts used for the tests.
Trademarks
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Contact Details
PassMark Software Pty Ltd Suite 202, Level 2 35 Buckingham St. Surry Hills, 2010 Sydney, Australia Phone + 61 (2) 9690 0444 Fax + 61 (2) 9690 0445 Web www.passmark.com
Download Location
An electronic copy of this report can be found at the following location: http://www.passmark.com/tpsreport11
Performance Benchmark Page 46 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Appendix 1 – Test Environment
For our testing, PassMark Software used a test environment running Windows 7 Ultimate (64-bit) SP1 with the following hardware specifications:
Windows 7 (64-bit) System
CPU: Intel Core i7 920 Quad Core @ 2.67GHz Video Card: nVidia GeForce 8800 GT Motherboard: Intel x58 Motherboard RAM: 6GB DDR3 RAM HDD: Western Digital 500GB 7200RPM Network: Gigabit (1GB/s) switch
Performance Benchmark Page 47 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Appendix 2 – Methodology Description
Windows 7 Image Creation
As with testing on Windows Vista, Norton Ghost was used to create a “clean” baseline image prior to testing. Our aim is to create a baseline image with the smallest possible footprint and reduce the possibility of variation caused by external operating system factors.
The baseline image was restored prior to testing of each different product. This process ensures that we install and test all products on the same, “clean” machine.
The steps taken to create the base Windows 7 image are as follows:
1. Installation and activation of Windows 7 Ultimate Edition. 2. Disabled Automatic Updates. 3. Changed User Account Control settings to “Never Notify”. 4. Disable Windows Defender automatic scans to avoid unexpected background activity. 5. Disable the Windows firewall to avoid interference with security software. 6. Installed Norton Ghost for imaging purposes. 7. Disabled Superfetch to ensure consistent results. 8. Installed HTTP Watch for Browse Time testing. 9. Installed Windows Performance Toolkit x64 for Boot Time testing. 10. Installed Active Perl for interpretation of some test scripts. 11. Install OSForensics for testing (Installation Size and Registry Key Count tests) purposes. 12. Disabled updates, accelerators and compatibility view updates in Internet Explorer 8. 13. Update to Windows Service Pack 1 14. Created a baseline image using Norton Ghost.
Benchmark 1 – Boot Time
PassMark Software uses tools available from the Windows Performance Toolkit version 4.6 (as part of the Microsoft Windows 7 SDK obtainable from the Microsoft Website) with a view to obtaining more precise and consistent boot time results on the Windows 7 platform.
The boot process is first optimized with xbootmgr.exe using the command “xbootmgr.exe -trace boot – prepSystem” which prepares the system for the test over six optimization boots. The boot traces obtained from the optimization process are discarded.
After boot optimization, the benchmark is conducted using the command "xbootmgr.exe -trace boot -numruns 5”. This command boots the system five times in succession, taking detailed boot traces for each boot cycle.
Finally, a post-processing tool was used to parse the boot traces and obtain the BootTimeViaPostBoot value. This value reflects the amount of time it takes the system to complete all (and only) boot time processes. Our final result is an average of five boot traces.
Performance Benchmark Page 48 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmark 2 – Scan Time
Scan Time is the time it took for each product to scan a set of sample files. The sample used was identical in all cases and contained a mixture of system files and Office files. In total there were 6159 files whose combined size was 982 MB. Most of these files come from the Windows system folders. As the file types can influence scanning speed, the breakdown of the main file types, file numbers and total sizes of the files in the sample set is given here:
File Extension Number of Files File Size
.dll 2589 490MB .exe 695 102MB .sys 332 23MB .gif 302 1MB .doc 281 64MB .wmf 185 2MB .png 149 2MB .html 126 1MB .nls 80 6MB .jpg 70 1MB .ini 59 2MB .ico 58 <1MB .mof 43 6MB .ax 39 4MB .xls 38 3MB .ime 35 5MB .drv 31 1MB .txt 31 1MB .chm 30 6MB .cpl 29 4MB .mfl 29 3MB .inf 26 2MB .hlp 22 3MB .imd 20 18MB .py 20 <1MB .msc 18 1MB .vbs 18 1MB .xml 18 1MB .rtf 16 62MB .ocx 16 4MB .tsp 14 1MB .com 14 <1MB .xsl 14 <1MB .h 13 <1MB .vsd 12 2MB .scr 12 2MB .aw 12 2MB .js 12 1MB .zip 11 25MB .lex 9 10MB .ppt 9 4MB .acm 9 1MB .wav 7 5MB Total 6159 982
Performance Benchmark Page 49 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
This scan was run without launching the product’s user interface, by right-clicking the test folder and choosing the “Scan Now” option. To record the scan time, we have used product’s built-in scan timer or reporting system. Where this was not possible, scan times were taken manually with a stopwatch.
For each product, five samples were taken with the machine rebooted before each sample to clear any caching effects by the operating systems.
In 2009, we noticed many more products showing a substantial difference between the initial scan time (first scan) and subsequent scan times (scans 2 to 5). We believe this behavior is due to products themselves caching recently scanned files.
As a result of this mechanism, we have averaged the four subsequent scan times to obtain an average subsequent scan time. Our final result for this test is an average of the subsequent scan average and the initial scan time.
Benchmark 3 – User Interface Launch Time
The launch time of a product’s user interface was taken using AppTimer (v1.0.1006). For each product tested, we obtained a total of fifteen samples from five sets of three UI launches, with a reboot before each set to clear caching effects by the operating system. When compiling the results the first of each set was separated out so that there was a set of values for the initial launch after reboot and a set for subsequent launches.
We have averaged the subsequent launch times to obtain an average subsequent launch time. Our final result for this test is an average of the subsequent launch average and the initial launch time.
In some cases, AppTimer did not correctly record the time taken for UI launch. For instance, some applications would open their window and look like they were ready, but then continued to be unresponsive. Where the measurement from AppTimer appeared inaccurate, we have taken the time manually with a stop watch.
AppTimer is publically available from the PassMark Website.
Benchmark 4 – Memory Usage during System Idle
The Perflog++ utility was used to record process memory usage on the system at boot, and then every minute for another fifteen minutes after. This was done only once per product and resulted in a total of 15 samples. The first sample taken at boot is discarded.
The PerfLog++ utility records memory usage of all processes, not just those of the anti-malware product. As a result of this, an anti-malware product’s processes needed to be isolated from all other running system processes. To isolate relevant process, we used a program called Process Explorer which was run immediately upon the completion of memory usage logging by PerfLog++. Process Explorer is a Microsoft Windows Sysinternals software tool which shows a list of all DLL processes currently loaded on the system.
Benchmark 5 – Browse Time
We used a script in conjunction with HTTPWatch (Basic Edition, version 6.1) to record the amount of time it takes for a set of 106 ‘popular’ websites to load consecutively from a local server. This script feeds a list of URLs into HTTPWatch, which instructs the browser to load pages in sequence and monitors the amount of time it takes for the browser to load all items on one page. Performance Benchmark Page 50 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
For this test, we have used Internet Explorer 8 (Version 8.0.6001.18783) as our browser.
The set of websites used in this test include front pages of high traffic pages. This includes shopping, social, news, finance and reference websites.
The Browse Time test is executed five times and our final result is an average of these five samples. The local server is restarted between different products and one initial ‘test’ run is conducted prior to testing to install Adobe Flash Player, an add-on which is used by many popular websites.
Benchmark 6 – Internet Explorer Launch Time
The average launch time of Internet Explorer interface was taken using AppTimer. This test was practically identical to the User Interface launch time test. For each product tested, we obtained a total of fifteen samples from five sets of three Internet Explorer launches, with a reboot before each set to clear caching effects by the operating system. When compiling the results the first of each set was separated out so that there was a set of values for the initial launch after reboot and a set for subsequent launches.
For this test, we have used Internet Explorer 8 (Version 8.0.6001.18783) as our test browser.
We have averaged the subsequent launch times to obtain an average subsequent launch time. Our final result for this test is an average of the subsequent launch average and the initial launch time.
Benchmark 7 – Installation Time
This test measures the minimum Installation Time a product requires to be fully functional and ready for use by the end user. Installation time can usually be divided in three major phases:
The Extraction and Setup phase consists of file extraction, the EULA prompt, product activation and user configurable options for installation.
The File Copy phase occurs when the product is being installed; usually this phase is indicated by a progress bar.
The Post-Installation phase is any part of the installation that occurs after the File Copy phase. This phase varies widely between products; the time recorded in this phase may include a required reboot to finalize the installation or include the time the program takes to become idle in the system tray.
To reduce the impact of disk drive variables, each product was copied to the Desktop before initializing installation. Each step of the installation process was manually timed with a stopwatch and recorded in as much detail as possible. Where input was required by the end user, the stopwatch was paused and the input noted in the raw results in parenthesis after the phase description.
Where possible, all requests by products to pre-scan or post-install scan were declined or skipped. Where it was not possible to skip a scan, the time to scan was included as part of the installation time. Where an optional component of the installation formed a reasonable part of the functionality of the software, it was also installed (e.g. website link checking software as part of an Internet Security Product).
Performance Benchmark Page 51 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Installation time includes the time taken by the product installer to download components required in the installation. This may include mandatory updates or the delivery of the application itself from a download manager. We have noted in our results where a product has downloaded components for product installation.
We have excluded product activation times due to network variability in contacting vendor servers or time taken in account creation.
Benchmark 8 – Installation Size
A product's Installation Size was previously defined as the difference between the initial snapshot of the Disk Space (C: drive) before installation and the subsequent snapshot taken after the product is installed on the system. Although this is a widely used methodology, we noticed that the results it yielded were not always reproducible in Vista due to random OS operations that may take place between the two snapshots. We improved the Installation Size methodology by removing as many Operating System and disk space variables as possible.
Using PassMark’s OSForensics we created initial and post-installation disk signatures for each product. These disk signatures recorded the amount of files and directories, and complete details of all files on that drive (including file name, file size, checksum, etc) at the time the signature was taken.
The initial disk signature was taken immediately prior to installation of the product. A subsequent disk signature was taken immediately following a system reboot after product installation. Using OSForensics, we compared the two signatures and calculated the total disk space consumed by files that were new, modified, and deleted during product installation. Our result for this metric reflects the total size of all newly added files during installation.
The scope of this metric includes only an ‘out of the box’ installation size for each product. Our result does not cover the size of files downloaded by the product after its installation (such as engine or signature updates), or any files created by system restore points, pre-fetch files and other temporary files.
Benchmark 9 – Registry Key Count
This test measures the amount of keys and values added to registry, after rebooting the test machine following a successful product installation. The test was conducted using RegistryCounter.exe, an application which conducts a count of all keys, errors and values under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and HKEY_USERS.
Two Registry Key counts are taken, one prior to installation and a second immediately following a reboot after installation. To obtain our result, we calculated the difference between these two registry key totals.
Occasionally, an unusually large number of registry keys were removed by the system. This seemed to occur when a product was installed, but was not necessarily caused directly by the product. This resulted in a largely negative difference in registry keys between the before and after registry key counts obtained using RegistryCounter.exe. To overcome this problem, we used PassMark’s OSForensics to calculate and obtain a breakdown of the new, modified and deleted keys separately. The total of the new keys obtained from OSForensics was used as the result for this test in the case that the former method using RegistryCounter.exe yielded a negative value.
Performance Benchmark Page 52 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Benchmarks 10-15 – Real-Time Performance
We used a single script in testing Benchmarks 10-15. The script consecutively executes tests for Benchmarks 10- 15. The script times each phase in these benchmarks using CommandTimer.exe and appends results to a log file.
Benchmarks 10 – File Copy, Move and Delete
This test measures the amount of time required for the system to copy, move and delete samples of files in various file formats. This sample was made up of 812 files over 760,867,636 bytes and can be categorized as documents [26% of total], media files [54% of total] and PE files (i.e. System Files) [20% of total].
The breakdown of the main file types, file numbers and total sizes of the files in the sample set is shown in the following table:
File format Number Size (bytes)
DOC 8 30,450,176
DOCX 4 13,522,409
PPT 3 5,769,216
PPTX 3 4,146,421
XLS 4 2,660,352
XLSX 4 1,426,054
PDF 73 136,298,049
ZIP 4 6,295,987
7Z 1 92,238
JPG 351 31,375,259
GIF 6 148,182
MOV 7 57,360,371
RM 1 5,658,646
AVI 8 78,703,408
WMV 5 46,126,167
MP3 28 191,580,387
EXE 19 2,952,914
DLL 104 29,261,568
AX 1 18,432
CPL 2 2,109,440
CPX 2 4,384
DRV 10 154,864
ICO 1 107,620
MSC 1 41,587
NT 1 1,688
ROM 2 36,611
Performance Benchmark Page 53 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
SCR 2 2,250,240
SYS 1 37,528,093
TLB 3 135,580
TSK 1 1,152
UCE 1 22,984
EXE 19 2,952,914
DLL 104 29,261,568
AX 1 18,432
CPL 2 2,109,440
CPX 2 4,384
DRV 10 154,864
ICO 1 107,620
MSC 1 41,587
NT 1 1,688
ROM 2 36,611
SCR 2 2,250,240
SYS 1 37,528,093
TLB 3 135,580
TSK 1 1,152
UCE 1 22,984
Total 812 760,867,636
This test was conducted five times to obtain the average time to copy, move and delete the sample files, with the test machine rebooted between each sample to remove potential caching effects.
Benchmark 11 – Third Party Program Installation
This test measured how much time was required to install and uninstall a third party application. For this test, CommandTimer.exe timed how long it took to install and uninstall the following applications on the test machine:
Firefox 3.6.3 (11,909 KB) (MSI File) Microsoft .NET 3.5 (34,121 KB) (MSI File) Steam (1,551 KB) (MSI File)
This test was conducted five times to obtain the average time to install/uninstall the above third party programs, with the test machine rebooted between each sample to remove potential caching effects.
Benchmark 12 – Network Throughput
This benchmark measured how much time was required to download a sample set of binary files of various sizes and types over a 100MB/s network connection. The files were hosted on a server machine running Windows Server 2008 and IIS 7. CommandTimer.exe was used in conjunction with GNU Wget (version 1.10.1) to time and conduct the download test. Performance Benchmark Page 54 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
The complete sample set of files was made up of 553,638,694 bytes over 484 files and two file type categories: media files [74% of total] and documents [26% of total]. The breakdown of the file types, file numbers and total sizes of the files in the sample set is shown in the following table:
File format Number Size (bytes)
JPEG 343 30,668,312
GIF 9 360,349
PNG 5 494,780
MOV 7 57,360,371
RM 1 5,658,646
AVI 8 78,703,408
WMV 5 46,126,167
MP3 28 191,580,387
PDF 73 136,298,049
ZIP 4 6,295,987
7Z 1 92,238
Total 484 553,638,694
This test was conducted five times to obtain the average time to download this sample of files, with the test machine rebooted between each sample to remove potential caching effects.
Benchmark 13 – File Format Conversion (MP3 WAV, MP3 WMA)
This test measured how much time was required to convert five (5) different MP3 files into WAV files and subsequently, convert the same MP3 samples into a WMA files. The total size of the five (5) MP3s used was 25,870,899 bytes.
To encode the MP3 into another format, we used an application called ffmpeg.exe. The format conversion process was timed using CommandTimer.exe.
This test was conducted five times to obtain the average conversion speed between these formats, with the test machine rebooted between each sample to remove potential caching effects.
Benchmark 14 – File Compression and Decompression
This test measured the amount of time required to compress and decompress a sample set of files. For this test, we used a subset of the media and documents files used in the File Copy, Move and Delete benchmark. CommandTimer.exe recorded the amount of time required for 7zip.exe to compress the files into a *.zip and subsequently decompress the created *.zip file.
This subset comprised 1,218 files over 783 MB. The breakdown of the file types, file numbers and total sizes of the files in the sample set is shown in the following table:
File Type File Number Total Size
Performance Benchmark Page 55 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
.xls 13 9.23 MB
.xlsx 9 3.51 MB
.ppt 9 7.37 MB
.pptx 11 17.4 MB
.doc 17 35.9 MB
.docx 19 24.5 MB
.gif 177 1.10 MB
.jpg 737 66.2 MB
.png 159 48.9 MB
.mov 7 54.7 MB
.rm 1 5.39 MB
.avi 46 459 MB
.wma 11 48.6 MB
.avi 46 459 MB
.wma 11 48.6 MB
Total 1218 783 MB
This test was conducted five times to obtain the average file compression and decompression speed, with the test machine rebooted between each sample to remove potential caching effects.
Benchmark 15 – File Write, Open and Close
This benchmark was derived from Oli Warner’s File I/O test at http://www.thepcspy.com (please see Reference #1: What Really Slows Windows Down).
For this test, we developed OpenClose.exe, an application that looped writing a small file to disk, then opening and closing that file. CommandTimer.exe was used to time how long the process took to complete 180,000 cycles.
This test was conducted five times to obtain the average file writing, opening and closing speed, with the test machine rebooted between each sample to remove potential caching effects.
Benchmark 16 – PE Scan Time
This test measures the on demand scan times of a file set comprised only of executable files (.exe, .dll and .sys files). We performed five scans of the sample file set, with a machine restart between each scan to remove possible caching effects. The time taken to scan the files is taken from an antivirus product’s scan logs, or where logs are not available, manually with a stopwatch. Scans were launched by right clicking on the folder to be scanned.
A breakdown of the sample file set is as follows:
File Type Number File Size of Files
Performance Benchmark Page 56 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011 Consumer Internet Security and Antivirus Solutions PassMark Software
Sys Files 2174 329MB
Dll Files 2037 920MB
Exe Files 2140 827MB
Total 6351 2076MB
The final result is calculated as an average of the five samples.
Benchmark 17 – File Copy Disk to Disk
This test measures the amount of time taken to copy files between two local drives. The data set comprised of 8,501 files with a total file size of 5.44GB, and the formats used included documents, movies, images and executables. A breakdown of the sample file set is given below:
File Number File Size Extension of Files
.jpg 2903 588MB
.dll 773 25MB
.exe 730 197MB
.gif 681 63MB
.wav 430 260MB
.sys 501 79MB
.png 451 27MB
.mp3 333 2157MB
.wma 585 925MB
.docx 267 81MB
.avi 247 1079MB
.doc 160 57MB
.xls 329 132MB
.ppt 97 148MB
.zip 14 177MB
Total 8501 5995MB
A total of five runs of this test were performed, with a machine restart between each run. The time taken to copy files was measured and recorded by CommandTimer.exe. All the files were copied between a folder on the local drive and a 2nd folder on a different drive. Files were deleted from the 2nd drive once the copy was complete. The final result is calculated as an average of the five samples
Performance Benchmark Page 57 of 57 Edition 2 15 November 2011