DOCSLIB.ORG

To View the PJCHR As a Fix-All for Human Rights Considerations in the Australian Context Or Even the Parliamentary Context

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To View the PJCHR As a Fix-All for Human Rights Considerations in the Australian Context Or Even the Parliamentary Context AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP Established in 1978, the Australasian Study of Parliament Group (ASPG) is a politically nonpartisan body, focused on encouraging and stimulating research, writing, teaching and discussion about parliamentary institutions, particularly those of Australia, New Zealand and the South Pacific. The ASPG has a main Executive body and has established Chapters in all States and Territories of Australia and in New Zealand. These Chapters are supported by the institutions providing secretariat services to the respective legislatures in Australia and New Zealand. ASPG membership consists of parliamentarians, parliamentary officers, academics, teachers, journalists, students and other interested individuals. For more information about the ASPG and its membership go to www.aspg.org.au. The Australasian Parliamentary Review (APR) is the official journal of the ASPG. Material published in the APR is subject to copyright. Requests for permission to reproduce material from the APR should be directed to the Editor. ©Australasian Study of Parliament Group ISSN 1447-9125 AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Editor: Professor Rodney Smith, University of Sydney. Email: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Dr Peter Aimer, University of Auckland Dr Paul Reynolds, Parliament of Queensland Jennifer Aldred, Public and Regulatory Policy Kirsten Robinson, Parliament of Western Australia Consultant Kevin Rozzoli, University of Sydney Dr David Clune, University of Sydney Professor Cheryl Saunders, University of Melbourne Dr Ken Coghill, Monash University Emeritus Professor Marian Sawer, Australian National Professor Brian Costar, Swinburne University of University Technology Professor Marian Simms, Deakin University Dr Jennifer Curtin, University of Auckland Dr Robyn Smith, Parliament of the Northern Territory Dr Gareth Griffith, NSW Parliamentary Library Dr David Solomon, former Queensland Integrity Professor John Halligan, University of Canberra Commissioner Associate Professor Graham Hassall, Victoria Dr Katrin Steinack, University of Melbourne University of Wellington Dr Elaine Thompson, University of New South Wales Dr Richard Herr, University of Tasmania Wayne Tunnecliffe, Parliament of Victoria Dr Michael Hogan, University of Sydney Professor Anne Twomey, University of Sydney Professor Bryan Horrigan, Monash University Dr June Verrier, former Head, Australian Parliament Professor Helen Irving, University of Sydney Information and Research Services Dr Rosemary Laing, Australian Senate Professor George Williams, University of New South Adjunct Professor Colleen Lewis, Monash University Wales Dr Clement MacIntyre, University of Adelaide Dr Isla Macphail, Parliament of Western Australia Professor Raymond Miller, University of Auckland Dr Harry Phillips, Parliament of Western Australia Dr Stephen Redenbach, Parliament of Victoria 1 Australasian Parliamentary Review AUTUMN/WINTER 2018 • VOL 33 NO 1 Table of Contents From the Editor 3 Rodney Smith 3 ARTICLES 5 Designing Referendums for Peacemaking: The Case of Bougainville* 6 Ron Levy, Amelia Simpson, Ian O’Flynn and Georgina Flaherty 6 The People’s Parliament: Have Petitions Had Their Day?* 41 Rebecca Burton 41 The Role, Operation and Effectiveness of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights after Five Years* 72 Zoe Hutchinson 72 Vote Seeking and the Strategy of Provocation: An Initial Analysis of the AfD’s Impact on the German Bundestag* 72 Charles Lees 108 Localism, Diversity and Volatility: The 2016 Australian Federal Election and the ‘Rise’ of Populism* 134 Nick Economou and Zareh Ghazarian 134 Public Office as/is a Public Trust 156 David Solomon AM 156 BOOK REVIEWS 168 The Australian Policy Handbook: A Practical Guide to the Policy-Making Process (6th Edition), by Catherine Althaus, Peter Bridgman and Glyn Davis. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2017, pp. 320. RRP $55.00. 169 Colleen Lewis 169 2 Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, by Peter John Chen. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2016, pp. xxi + 406. RRP $40.00 (pb). 172 Darren Halpin 172 Silent Invasion: China's Influence in Australia, by Clive Hamilton. Melbourne: Hardie Grant, 2018, pp. 376. RRP $34.99 (pb). 174 David Clune 174 * Indicates that the article has been double-blind reviewed. 3 From the Editor Rodney Smith Professor of Australian Politics, University of Sydney Welcome to the second online issue of the Australasian Parliamentary Review. The first online issue was made available to Australasian Study of Parliament Group members in March. The feedback on the switch to an electronic format has overwhelmingly been positive and we are confident that the new format will only improve over time. The online journal format allows for easier article searches, as well as the inclusion of electronic links and graphical material that is difficult to reproduce in a paper-based journal. Individual articles can be printed by members who want to keep them to hand in paper form. The online production of this issue has once again been led by ASPG Vice President Lesley Ferguson. I would like to thank her for the skills and hard work she has again put into in ensuring that the transition to an online journal has been smooth. This issue of the Australasian Parliamentary Review meets the journal’s editorial goals of disseminating research about parliamentary politics in Australasia and the South Pacific, as well as trends in wider international politics of relevance to our region. In the first article, Ron Levy and his co-authors draw on deliberative democratic theory, a range of comparative cases and an understanding of local contextual factors to make a case for adopting a deliberative approach to the 2019 peacemaking referendum in Bougainville. Rebecca Burton assesses recent trends in petitions to the Parliament of Western Australian, arguing that petitions have not ‘had their day’ but that the petitions process might need to be reformed if they are to stay a relevant way for citizens to communicate with parliamentarians. Zoe Hutchinson provides a detailed five-year review of the work of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, challenging the view that it is ineffective and suggesting some measures to enhance its role. The next two articles deal with populist parties. Readers of both will be able to draw conclusions about similarities and differences in the electoral and parliamentary trajectories of populist parties in Germany and Australia. Charlie Lees provides an insightful account of the early impact of the Alternative for Germany party (AfD) on the politics of the German Bundestag, while Nick Economou and Zareh Ghazarian explain the comparative weakness of populist parties in Australia. The final article is based on a presentation by David Solomon to the 2018 Australasian Study of Parliament Group National Conference held in Brisbane in July. In this article, he traces a recent revival in the use of ‘public trust’ and ‘public interest’ as 4 measures by which public officials, including parliamentarians, should be assessed. I hope to publish more papers from the 2018 Conference in future issues of the journal. I would like again to thank the helpful experts who refereed five of the papers for this issue. The authors found the comments of the referees constructive and the papers were improved as a result. This issue is rounded off with three reviews of significant recent books in Australian politics and public policy: Catherine Althouse et al’s Australian Policy Handbook, Peter Chen’s Animal Welfare in Australia, and Clive Hamilton’s Silent Invasion. If you have a relevant book that you would like reviewed in the Australasian Parliamentary Review, please contact me. 5 Articles 6 Designing Referendums for Peacemaking: The Case of Bougainville* Ron Levy, Amelia Simpson, Ian O’Flynn and Georgina Flaherty1 Associate Professor, ANU Law School, Australian National University Associate Professor, ANU Law School, Australian National University Senior Lecturer, School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University (UK) Research Associate (2017-2018), ANU Law School, Australian National University * Double-blind reviewed article. INTRODUCTION: THE PROSPECTS AND RISKS OF PEACEMAKING REFERENDUMS In 1975 the Bougainville Interim Provisional Government announced its intention to secede from Papua New Guinea (‘PNG’). Tensions escalated and took a dramatic turn in 1987-88 with the launch of an armed uprising by a group calling itself the Bougainville Revolutionary Army. The PNG government deployed its armed forces to quell the unrest and Bougainville erupted into a civil war that has been called the largest conflict in the region since the Second World War.2 The war was finally brought to a close in 1998, followed by the signing of the Bougainville Peace Agreement (BPA) in 2001. The BPA in turn led to the creation of the Autonomous Region of Bougainville (‘ARB’). Under Part XIV of the PNG Constitution (amended as a result of the BPA), the ‘two governments’ of PNG and the ARB must together negotiate the details around the 1 We are grateful to Satish Chand, Anna Dziedzic, Bal Kama and Anthony Regan for discussion of and insights on this article. 2 Volker Boege, ‘Peacebuilding and State Formation’, Peace Review 21 2009: 30. 7 conduct of a referendum to resolve the region’s future political status. Negotiations are well underway, with an agreement having been reached on many procedural matters and 15 June 2019 set as the current target referendum date. Globally,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senate Crossbench Background 2016
    Barton Deakin Brief: Senate Crossbench 4 August 2016 The 2016 federal election resulted in a large number of Senators elected that were not members of the two major parties. Senators and Members of the House of Representatives who are not part of the Coalition Government or the Labor Opposition are referred to collectively as the Senate ‘crossbench’. This Barton Deakin Brief outlines the policy positions of the various minor parties that constitute the crossbench. Background Due to the six year terms of Senators, at a normal election (held every three years) only 38 of the Senate’s 76 seats are voted on. As the 2016 federal election was a double dissolution election, all 76 seats were contested. To pass legislation a Government needs 39 votes in the Senate. As the Coalition won just 30 seats it will have to rely on the support of minor parties and independents to pass legislation when it is opposed by Labor. Since the introduction of new voting reforms in the Senate, minor parties can no longer rely on the redistribution of above-the-line votes according to preference flows to satisfy the 14.3% quota (or, in the case of a double dissolution, 7.7%) needed to win a seat in Senate elections. The new Senate voting reforms allowed voters to control their preferences by numbering all candidates above the line, thereby reducing the effectiveness of preference deals that have previously resulted in Senators being elected with a small fraction of the primary vote. To read Barton Deakin’s Brief on the Senate Voting Reforms, click here.
    [Show full text]
  • Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation in Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015)
    Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation In Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015) Joanna Richards School of Government and Policy Faculty of Business, Government and Law University of Canberra ABSTRACT In 2016, Australia ranks 54th in the world for representation of women in Parliament, with women ​ accounting for only 29% of the House of Representatives, and 39% of the Senate. This inevitably ​ inspires discussion about women in parliament, quotas, and leadership styles. Given the wealth of research which suggests that equal representation does not necessarily guarantee equal treatment, this study focuses on Authoritative representation. That is, the space in between winning a seat and making a difference where components of communication and interaction affect the authority of a speaker.This study combines a Discourse Analysis of the official Hansard transcripts from the Senate Estimates Committee hearings, selected over a 10 year period between 2006 and 2015, with a linguistic ethnography of the Australian Senate to complement results with context. Results show that although female senators and witnesses are certainly in the room, they do not have the same capacity as their male counterparts. Both the access and effectiveness of women in the Senate is limited; not only are they given proportionally less time to speak, but interruption, gate keeping tactics, and the designation of questions significantly different in nature to those directed at men all work to limit female participation in the political domain. As witnesses, empirical measures showed that female testimony was often undermined by senators. Results also showed that female senators and witnesses occasionally adopted masculine styles of communication in an attempt to increase effectiveness in the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Election 1996
    DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY Parliamentary Research Service Federal Elections 1996 Background Paper NO.6 1996-97 • ~ l '-\< ~.r /~( . ~__J .. ~r:_~'_r.T-rr-Ji,_.~:;~;.~:~~;:;;~~~5!~'~ ;aft~::.u...- ... ~ . ..x-"\.~. ~'d__~ 4 ...,,--.;." .. _"'J,.gp. ..... !:l,;:.1t ....... ISSN 1037-2938 © Copyrigbt Commonwealth of Australia 1996 Except to the extent of the uses pemtitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. Tbis paper bas been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. Wbile great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. Tbe views expressed are those of the author and sbould not be attributed to the Parliamentary Researcb Service (PRS). Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. PRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Publisbed by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 1996 Parliamentary Research Service Federal Elections 1996 Gerard Newman Andrew Kopras Statistics Group 4 November 1996 Background Paper No.6 1996-97 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Brien Hallett, Australian Electoral Commission, and JanPearson for their assistance in preparing this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • New Senate Push to Kill Union Merger Tion Provisions Against a Company
    21 Mar 2018 Australian Financial Review, Australia Author: David Marin-Guzman And Andrew Tillett • Section: General News Article Type: News Item • Audience : 44,635 • Page: 7 • Printed size: 394.00cm² Market: National • Country: Australia • ASR: AUD 7,969 • words: 775 Item ID: 928658170 Licensed by Copyright Agency. You may only copy or communicate this work with a licence. Page 1 of 2 New Senate push to kill union merger tion provisions against a company. David Marin-Guzman as former employment minister That power lies witti the Australian Michaelia Cash came under criticism and Andrew Tillett Securities and Investments Commis- for not trying harder to get die laws The Turnbull government has sion. Under the government's legisla- passed in die Senate before die launched a fresh push to get laws tion, the minister could initiate CFMEU-MUA merger was approved. blocking the merger of the militant disqualification provisions against a It is too late for die bill in its current construction and maritime unions union official. But Senator Patrick said form to stop the merger, which will passed in the Senate, sparking union this should be done by the regulator formally take place on March 27. concerns die bill could get voted rather than be politicised. However, the Australian Mines and through this week. "We have no issue with die bill Metals Association, fearing the power Key crossbench senators have con- die new union will have over the firmed they are negotiating amend- provided it's not overreaching," he said. resources industry, has urged the ments with the government on its "We want to make sure its fair." government to amend the bill so it Ensuring Integrity Bill, which prevents The government needs nine out of 11 will apply before me merger date amalgamation of unions witii a history crossbenchers to get die legislation takes effect of lawlessness and grants the minister through the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Day Polling Booths (Information As at 28 March 2020) Polling Booths Will Be Open on Election Day (Saturday, 28 March 2020) from 8Am to 6Pm
    2020 Local government elections - Election day polling booths (information as at 28 March 2020) Polling booths will be open on election day (Saturday, 28 March 2020) from 8am to 6pm. Polling booth locations may be subject to change. Changes are listed at the bottom of this table, or check the ECQ website for updated information or phone 1300 881 665. Local government area Ward / Division Booth Name Disability Access Address Aurukun Shire Council Aurukun LG Full Wo’uw Koalam Community Centre, Cnr Tal Tal Street and McKenzie Drive, AURUKUN Boulia Shire Council Boulia LG Full Shire Hall, Herbert Street, BOULIA Brisbane City Council All Wards Brisbane City Hall None Brisbane City Hall, Sandgate Room, (Ann Street entrance), BRISBANE Brisbane City Council Bracken Ridge Brisbane City Hall None Brisbane City Hall, Sandgate Room, (Ann Street entrance), BRISBANE Aspley Full Aspley Special School Hall, 751 Zillmere Road, ASPLEY Aspley East Full Aspley East State School, Multi Purpose Activity Centre, Clorane Street, ASPLEY Bald Hills Full Bald Hills State School Hall, 2156 Gympie Road, BALD HILLS Bracken Ridge Full Bracken Ridge Uniting Church, 7 Pellinore Road, BRACKEN RIDGE Bracken Ridge East Full Bracken Ridge State School, Denham Street, BRACKEN RIDGE Bracken Ridge West Full Norris Road State School Hall, Pritchard Place, BRACKEN RIDGE Bridgeman Downs Assisted Church of the Resurrection Hall, 30 Ridley Road, BRIDGEMAN DOWNS Fitzgibbon Assisted Fitzgibbon Community Centre, 545 Roghan Road, FITZGIBBON Taigum Full Taigum State School Hall, 266 Handford
    [Show full text]
  • Matters Referred to Committees During the Reporting Period, 104 Matters Were Referred to Senate Committees for Inquiry and Report
    Matters referred to Committees During the reporting period, 104 matters were referred to Senate Committees for inquiry and report. This included 57 individual/packages of bills referred through the Selection of Bills Committee, 4 matters adopted or re-adopted by Legislation Committees, 26 matters referred to References Committees, 10 matters referred to, adopted or re-adopted by Joint Committees and 7 Select Committees established. The details are as follows: Date Committee Inquiry Referred (Daily Total) EC (Leg) Coal-Fired Power Funding Prohibition Bill 2017 (through 04.07.2019 the Selection of Bills Committee for inquiry and report by (13) 2 December 2019) EC (Leg) Competition and Consumer Amendment (Prevention of Exploitation of Indigenous Cultural Expressions) Bill 2019 (through the Selection of Bills Committee for inquiry and report by 5 December 2019) FPA (Leg) Ministers of State (Checks for Security Purposes) Bill 2019 (through the Selection of Bills Committee for inquiry and report by 11 November 2019) EC (Leg) Murray-Darling Basin Commission of Inquiry Bill 2019 (through the Selection of Bills Committee for inquiry and report by 19 September 2019) LCA (Leg) Criminal Code Amendment (Agricultural Protection) Bill 2019 [Provisions] (through the Selection of Bills Committee for inquiry and report by 6 September 2019) LCA (Leg) Customs Amendment (Immediate Destruction of Illicit Tobacco) Bill 2019 [Provisions] (through the Selection of Bills Committee for inquiry and report by 19 July 2019) EE (Leg) Fair Work (Registered Organisations)
    [Show full text]
  • Whitlam's Children? Labor and the Greens in Australia (2007-2013
    Whitlam’s Children? Labor and the Greens in Australia (2007-2013) Shaun Crowe A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University March 2017 © Shaun Crowe, 2017 1 The work presented in this dissertation is original, to the best of my knowledge and belief, except as acknowledged in the text. The material has not been submitted, in whole or in part, for a degree at The Australian National University or any other university. This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. 2 Acknowledgments Before starting, I was told that completing a doctoral thesis was rewarding and brutal. Having now written one, these both seem equally true. Like all PhD students, I never would have reached this point without the presence, affirmation and help of the people around me. The first thanks go to Professor John Uhr. Four and half years on, I’m so lucky to have stumbled into your mentorship. With such a busy job, I don’t know how you find the space to be so generous, both intellectually and with your time. Your prompt, at times cryptic, though always insightful feedback helped at every stage of the process. Even more useful were the long and digressive conversations in your office, covering the world between politics and philosophy. I hope they continue. The second round of thanks go to the people who aided me at different points. Thanks to Guy Ragen, Dr Jen Rayner and Alice Workman for helping me source interviews. Thanks to Emily Millane, Will Atkinson, Dr Lizzy Watt, and Paul Karp for editing chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • ACA Qld 2019 National Conference
    ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ • • • • • • • • • • • • • Equal Remuneration Order (and Work Value Case) • 4 yearly review of Modern Awards • Family friendly working conditions (ACA Qld significant involvement) • Casual clauses added to Modern Awards • Minimum wage increase – 3.5% • Employment walk offs, strikes • ACA is pursuing two substantive claims, • To provide employers with greater flexibility to change rosters other than with 7 days notice. • To allow ordinary hours to be worked before 6.00am or after 6.30pm. • • • • • Electorate Sitting Member Opposition Capricornia Michelle Landry [email protected] Russell Robertson Russell.Robertson@quee nslandlabor.org Forde Bert Van Manen [email protected] Des Hardman Des.Hardman@queenslan dlabor.org Petrie Luke Howarth [email protected] Corinne Mulholland Corinne.Mulholland@que enslandlabor.org Dickson Peter Dutton [email protected] Ali France Ali.France@queenslandla bor.org Dawson George Christensen [email protected] Belinda Hassan Belinda.Hassan@queensl .au andlabor.org Bonner Ross Vasta [email protected] Jo Briskey Jo.Briskey@queenslandla bor.org Leichhardt Warren Entsch [email protected] Elida Faith Elida.Faith@queenslandla bor.org Brisbane Trevor Evans [email protected] Paul Newbury paul.newbury@queenslan dlabor.org Bowman Andrew Laming [email protected] Tom Baster tom.Baster@queenslandla bor.org Wide Bay Llew O’Brien [email protected] Ryan Jane Prentice [email protected] Peter Cossar peter.cossar@queensland
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Labor Shadow Ministry January 2021
    Federal Labor Shadow Ministry January 2021 Portfolio Minister Leader of the Opposition The Hon Anthony Albanese MP Shadow Cabinet Secretary Senator Jenny McAllister Deputy Leader of the Opposition The Hon Richard Marles MP Shadow Minister for National Reconstruction, Employment, Skills and Small Business Shadow Minister for Science Shadow Minister Assisting for Small Business Matt Keogh MP Shadow Assistant Minister for Employment and Skills Senator Louise Pratt Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator the Hon Penny Wong Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs Shadow Minister for International Development and the Pacific Pat Conroy MP Shadow Assistant Minister to the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator Jenny McAllister Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator the Hon Kristina Keneally Shadow Minister for Home Affairs Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Shadow Minister for Government Accountability Shadow Minister for Multicultural Affairs Andrew Giles MP Shadow Minister Assisting for Immigration and Citizenship Shadow Minister for Disaster and Emergency Management Senator Murray Watt Shadow Minister Assisting on Government Accountability Pat Conroy MP Shadow Minister for Industrial Relations The Hon Tony Burke MP Shadow Minister for the Arts Manager of Opposition Business in the House of Representatives Shadow Special Minister of State Senator the Hon Don Farrell Shadow Minister for Sport and Tourism Shadow Minister Assisting the Leader of the Opposition Shadow Treasurer Dr Jim Chalmers MP Shadow Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade
    PARLIAMENT OF AUSTRALIA Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade JSCFADT membership or Senate may also ask the Committee to undertake an inquiry. Information online Introduction The Joint Standing Committee The Committee may initiate its own inquiries into annual The JSCFADT is the largest committee of the Australian reports of relevant Government departments and authorities Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Welcome from the Australian Parliament’s Joint Standing on Foreign Affairs, Defence Parliament with 32 members. Membership comprises: or reports of the Auditor-General. www.aph.gov.au/jfadt Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade. and Trade • Five Senators and 12 House of Representatives Members An inquiry is based on the terms of reference – essentially The Parliament of Australia The Committee draws its membership from both the Senate from the governing party. a statement of the topic or issues to be examined. Usually, www.aph.gov.au and House of Representatives, with members sharing a Like many other legislatures, the Australian Parliament • Five Senators and eight House of Representatives inquiries are delegated to the relevant sub-committee to Department of Defence common interest in national security, international affairs and has established a system of committees. Australian Members from the opposition party. complete on behalf of the full Committee. www.defence.gov.au Australia’s role in the world. parliamentary committees each have a defined area of interest, such as the environment or economics. The Joint • Two Senators from a minority party or who are To complete the inquiry process, the Committee (or a Through its public inquiries and reports to Parliament, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and independents.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Redistribution Committee
    The 2009 Proposed Redistribution of Queensland into Electoral Divisions Report of the Redistribution Committee Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Section 68 Table of contents Executive Summary 1 Direction for a redistribution of Queensland electoral divisions 2 Quota 2 Enrolment projections 3 Appointment of the Redistribution Committee for Queensland 4 Invitations to submit public suggestions and comments 4 Statutory requirements for the making of a proposed redistribution 6 Technical procedures 8 Analysis of population trends 8 Enrolment in existing divisions as at 19 February 2009 9 Analysis of enrolment trends 10 Enrolment projections for existing divisions as at 9 July 2012 12 General strategy 15 Public suggestions and comments 17 Guidelines for the naming of divisions 19 Name of new division 19 Proposed redistribution of Queensland – by division: 20 Proposed South-East Queensland (South) divisions 22 Proposed South-East Queensland (North) divisions 27 Proposed Country divisions 30 Conclusion 34 Table 1 – Determination of the quota 2 Table 2 – Enrolment projections at 9 July 2012 3 Table 3 – Queensland regions for proposed redistribution 16 Table 4 – Summary of movement of electors between divisions 17 Table 5 – Themes 18 Table 6 – Divisions in order of discussion 21 Table 7 – Enrolment of existing divisions 35 Table 8 – Summary of proposed divisions 36 Table 9 – General description of how proposed divisions are constituted 37 Graph 1 – Queensland population quotas from 1997 to 2009 9 Graph 2 – Variation from the enrolment quota as at end 19 February 2009 for existing divisions 11 Graph 3 – Variation from projected average enrolment as at 9 July 2012 for existing divisions 13 Map Projected enrolment for existing divisions as at 9 July 2012 14 Enclosures Sheet 1 – Maps 1 and 2 Sheet 2 – Map 3 Sheet 3 – Map 4 CD – Containing the public suggestions received and comments received on those suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION FINDER 2019 Division Finder
    2019 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 2019 DIVISION FINDER Division Finder Queensland QLD EF54 EF54 i © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 This work is copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, scanning, recording or otherwise, without the written consent of the Australian Electoral Commission. All enquiries should be directed to the Australian Electoral Commission, Locked Bag 4007, Canberra ACT 2601. ii iii Contents Instructions For Use And Other Information Pages v-xiii INTRODUCTION Detailed instructions on how to use the various sections of the Division Finder. DIVISIONAL OFFICES A list of all divisional offices within the State showing physical and postal addresses, and telephone and facsimile numbers. INSTITUTIONS AND ESTABLISHMENTS A list of places of residence such as Universities, Hospitals, Defence Bases and Caravan Parks. This list may be of assistance in identifying institutions or establishments that cannot be found using the Locality and Street Sections. Locality Section Pages 1-43 This section lists all of the suburbs, towns and localities within the State of Queensland and the name of the corresponding electoral division the locality is contained in, or the reference ... See Street Section. Street Section Pages 47-135 This section lists all the streets for those localities in the Locality Section which have the reference ... See Street Section. Each street listing shows the electoral division the street is contained in. iv v Introduction The Division Finder is the official list used to Electors often do not know the correct identify the federal electoral division of the federal division in which they are enrolled, place an elector claims to be enrolled at.
    [Show full text]