Industrial Revolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Industrial Revolution Station 1 Lowell System The Lowell system or Waltham-Lowell system, named after Francis Cabot Lowell, was a paternalistic textile factory system of the early 19th century that relied almost exclusively on young, unmarried women laborers. Because many in New England considered the employment of women to be somewhat immoral, factory owners emphasized the maintenance of a proper environment: they enforced strict curfews, mandated church attendance, provided their workers with a healthy diet, and maintained a high degree of cleanliness. Unlike many of the factories of the day, Lowell factories were clean, and the workers lived in well-kept dormitories and boardinghouses. Wages were good compared to the standards of the day. The innovative system and the enthusiasm it incited in its employees drew international acclaim. The women wrote a newsletter, the Lowell Offering, that was widely read. Charles Dickens, who visited Lowell during part of his four-month tour of the United States, said of the place, "I cannot recall or separate one young face that gave me a painful impression; not one young girl whom, assuming it to be matter of necessity that she should gain her daily bread by the labour of her hands, I would have removed from those works if I had had the power." [1] (http://www.learner.org/channel/workshops/primarysources/lowell/docs/dickens.html) The system's success was one of the factors that propelled Lowell and his fellow entrepreneurs (later the Boston Associates) to great success. The Lowell system almost immediately ran into trouble, however. The women, most of whom were recruited from the surrounding countryside, found transition to factory life and the tediousness of repetitive tasks difficult. And the competitiveness of the textile industry made the high standards of living and working conditions difficult to maintain. An economic downturn in 1834 led to a 25% wage cut, and the mill workers responded by organizing a union (the Factory Girls Association) and immediately going on strike. The strike failed, but the depression of 1837 three years later virtually destroyed the system entirely. Despite the agitation of the militant Sarah Bagley and her Female Labor Reform Association, conditions continued to worsen throughout the 1840s, and the mill owners began to seek cheaper labor in Irish immigrants. By the 1850s, the Lowell system had been abandoned. Station 2 Lowell System Francis Cabot Lowell revolutionized the early stages of industrialization in the United States, with his vision of an entire community involved in textile production. Upon returning from a trip to England to observe the Lancashire cotton mills, Lowell was inspired to create a system of textile mills and develop a "paternalistic" working environment of caring for the workers. This setting would attempt to care for the workers while governing their moral reputations. Lowell passed away in 1817 before he was able to see his vision become a reality. The Boston Associates carried on the ideas of Francis Cabot Lowell and opened the first mills in Lowell, Massachusetts in 1823. The system used domestic labor, often referred to as mill girls, who came to the new textile centers from rural towns to earn more money than was possible at home, and to live a cultured life in "the city". They lived a very regimented life - they lived in company boardinghouses and were held to strict hours and a rigid moral code. Women between the ages of fifteen and thirty-five were recruited to work at the mills. The protective setting, promised by the mill agents, alleviated the parents' fears of letting their daughters leave the farms. The Lowell Mills management offered cash wages, company run boardinghouses and cultural events for the women. The women agreed to a strict set of rules including church attendance and curfews. In the 1800s, job options were limited for women and the Lowell Mills offered them the opportunity to become money earning rather than a money-saving part of the family. A further benefit to the mill owners was that the young mill girls were willing to work for two or three years at one-half to one-third the wages paid to men for similar work before returning home to marry and start a family. At $2.40 to $3.20 a week, the pay was still more than domestic servants and seamstresses, the two most common occupations for working women. Moreover, the work was not much more difficult than farm labor or home spinning, and most of the female workers enjoyed having more financial and personal independence that they had ever experienced in their paternalistic, male-centered farm households or in the claustrophobic confines of rural villages. The keepers of the Lowell boardinghouses where the women lived did impose strict discipline, with curfews, mandatory church attendance or Sunday self-improvement, and chaperones for male visitors, but the women were more than willing to trade these limits on their freedom for the money in their pockets and the camaraderie of their fellow workers, at least for a few years. Work routines were strict at Lowell, with a twelve-hour day starting at seven in the morning, and only a half- hour lunch break at midday. Factory bells announced times for leaving and entering the plant, and the employees were fined for lateness as well as other breaches of the rules, including insubordination, profanity, or improper conduct. The work did not demand great physical strength, but it did require constant attention as the women generally tended carding, spinning, and weaving machines, checking for and then correcting broken threads and patters. In winter, work began before sunup and lasted into the darkness, when smoky whale-oil lamps illuminated the interior of the factories. Because cotton thread breaks more readily in dry air, overseers sealed windows shut and sprayed water in the air to keep the humidity high in the six-story factories. As a result, not only were light and ventilation blocked, but the "buzzing and hissing and whizzing of pulleys and rollers and spindles and flyers" became an unnerving cacophony in the enclosed machinery rooms. It has long been debated by scholars if the intentions of Francis Cabot Lowells' "paternalistic" expectation of the Lowell mills were realized after his death. Through the documentation left by many of the female workers in the mill system, we can see that the hope for a clean, safe and nurturing environment was not always possible. Station 3 Immigration to the US Wars in Europe and American slowed immigration during the late 1700's and early 1800s. Newcomers included Irish fleeing English rule and French escaping revolution. Congress made it illegal to bring in slaves of 1808. By that time, about 375,000 black Africans had been imported as slaves. During the early 1800's, New York City began to replace Philadelphia as the nation's chief port of entry for immigrants. The country's first immigration station, Castle Garden, opened in New York City in 1855. Ellis Island, the world's most famous station, operated in New York Harbor from 1892 to 1954. The second wave lasted from 1820 to 1870. Almost 7 � million newcomers entered the United States. Nearly all of them came from northern and western Europe. About a third were Irish, many of them seeking escape from a potato famine that struck Ireland in the mid-1840's. Almost a third were German. Most of the Irish had little money, and so they stayed where they arrived, on the East Coast. Many Germans had enough money to journey to the Midwest in search of farmland. (Source: The World Book Encyclopedia, Volume 10, Page 82). In the mid-1880's, some states sent agents to Europe to attract settlers. Railroad companies did the same thing. Better conditions on ships and steep declines in travel time and fares made the voyage across the Atlantic Ocean easier and more affordable. In the mid-1800's news of the discovery of gold in California reached China. Chinese immigrants and sojourners streamed across the Pacific to strike it rich. Sojourners were temporary immigrants who intended to make money and return home. French-Canadian immigrants and sojourners opened still another path to the United States. They moved across the Canadian-U.S. border into the New England states and Michigan. The flood of immigrants began to alarm many native born Americans. Some feared job competition from foreigners. Others disliked the religion or politics of the newcomers. During the 1850's, the America Party, also called the Know-Nothing Party, demanded laws to reduce immigration and to make it harder for foreigners to become citizens. Although the part soon died out, it reflected the serious concerns of some Americans. During the 1870's, the U. S. economy suffered a depression while that of Germany and Britain improved. German and British immigration to the United States then decreased. But arrivals increased from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, China, Canada, and southern and eastern Europe. In 1875, the United States passed its first restrictive immigration law. It prevented convicts and prostitutes from entering the country. During the late 1870's, Californians demanded laws to keep out Chinese immigrants. In some instances, mobs attacked Chinese immigrants, who were accused of lowering wages and unfair business competition. They were also denounced as inassimilable and as racially inferior. Station 4 Immigration to US A. B. Station 5 Transportation Trains In 1852, the first railroad tracks were laid in Hilliard, Ohio. These railroad tracks were completed in 1853 and the railroad opened in Hilliard. The railroad station was made up of three boxcars put together to form a building, and it was called Hilliard’s Station.
Recommended publications
  • Occasionem Cognosce — Francis Cabot Lowell
    From AFIO's The Intelligencer Association of Former Intelligence Officers 7700 Leesburg Pike, Suite 324 Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies Falls Church, Virginia 22043 Web: www.afio.com * E-mail: [email protected] Volume 26 • Number 2 • Winter-Spring 2021 $15 single copy price The idea to look abroad for both individuals When Intelligence Made a Difference who had specialized knowledge of new technologies and obtaining this knowledge by other means was — 19th Century — explored by Alexander Hamilton. In 1791, he wrote on the topic at length in a section of his Report on Manu- factures, titled “The encouragement of New Inventions and Discoveries at Home and of the Introduction Into the United States of Such as May have Been Made in Other Countries, Particularly Those Which Relate to Machinery.”2 Occasionem Cognosce The Embargo of 1807 Economic conditions worsened for the US during Francis Cabot Lowell the Napoleonic Wars (1803-15) when hostilities between Britain and France restricted the US’s access to trade routes across the Atlantic. In 1804, an author by Joel Wickwire of the Federalist Papers, James Madison, wrote of this to James Monroe claiming Great Britain is searching t the end of the 18th century, the British colo- and seizing all manners of cargo and persons.3 Ten- nies in North America were largely an agrarian sions culminated in the “Chesapeake Affair” when economy. Most critical manufactured goods the USS Chesapeake was shot upon and surrendered to A the British, in clear violation of American sovereignty. were imported from Europe, traded for agricultural products.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Industrial Revolution: Analyses, Perceptions and Conceptions of Britain’S Precocious Transition to Europe’S First Industrial Society
    Working Paper No. 84/04 Reconstructing the Industrial Revolution: Analyses, Perceptions and Conceptions Of Britain’s Precocious Transition to Europe’s First Industrial Society Giorgio Riello And Patrick K. O’Brien © Giorgio Riello & Patrick K. O’Brien Department of Economic History London School of Economics May 2004 Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Tel: +44 (0) 20 7955 7860 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7955 7730 Reconstructing the Industrial Revolution: Analyses, Perceptions and Conceptions of Britain’s Precocious Transition to Europe’s First Industrial Society Giorgio Riello and Patrick K. O’Brien Summary The Industrial Revolution continues to be analysed by economic historians deploying the conceptual vocabularies of modern social science, particularly economics. Their approach which gives priority to the elaboration of causes and processes of evolution is far too often and superficially contrasted with post- modern forms of social and cultural history with their aspirations to recover the meanings of the Revolution for those who lived through its turmoil and for ‘witnesses’ from the mainland who visited the offshore economy between 1815- 48. Our purpose is to demonstrate how three distinct reconstructions of the Revolution are only apparently in conflict and above all that a contextualised analysis of observations of travellers from the mainland and the United States provides several clear insights into Britain’s famous economic transformation. Introduction Eric Hobsbawm observed: ‘words are witnesses which often speak louder than documents’.1 Together with the French Revolution and the Renaissance, the Industrial Revolution belongs to a restricted group of historical conjunctures that are famous.
    [Show full text]
  • TAH Mill Times Name:______Date
    TAH Mill Times Name:__________________________ date Starter Please Read: In 1821, the Boston Associates purchased land and rights to the Pawtucket Canal located north of the city of Boston, Massachusetts. The Associates built several textile mills and enlarged the Canal for water power. The first mills opened in 1823, and for the next 25 years more mills and a network of power canals were built. By 1848, Lowell was the largest industrial center in America! The mills produced 50,000 miles of cotton cloth each year. The Associates needed a large work force for the busy mills. They decided to run their mills using a work force of young women recruited from New England farms. Lowell was known around the world for this innovative solution. Lowell "Mill Girls" were asked to work in the factories for a few years, then return to the farms or marry. Mill girls filled the city of Lowell, living in boardinghouses managed by the corporations. Mill life meant a hard day's work in which girls followed a strict schedule marked by the ringing of bells. Mill girls were expected to follow the company rules for curfew, church attendance and proper behavior. Why were the Boston Associates important? ____________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Describe who were the Mill Girls of Lowell?_____________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Whimsical Destiny: a Portrait of Mary Babcock Gore
    THE NEWSLETTER OF GORE PLACE | SPRING 2019 | ISSUE NUMBER 6 IN THIS ISSUE A Whimsical Destiny Letter from our Board President Portrait of Robert Roberts A December Evening Reaching New Audiences with Accessibility Upcoming Programs Mrs. John Gore (Mary Babcock) about 1815, Warwick Castle by the River Avon GIlbert Stuart (American, 1755–1828), oil on canvas. Photo by DeFacto used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Social Media Moment Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Alike 4.0 International License. No changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en A Whimsical Destiny: A Portrait of Mary Babcock Gore Mary Gore’s 1815 portrait hangs prominently at hearing this great and glorious people [the English] Gore Place on the formal staircase above those anathematized by scrubs unworthy of even the of her husband John and his uncle Christopher name of men. Now behold me, landed from an and aunt Rebecca Gore. The image, painted by English ship-of-war, my footsteps for the first time distinguished American portraitist Gilbert Stuart, pressing the soil of my Forefathers, supported by It’s not every day that master conveys Mary’s beauty, refinement and position. the arm of an English officer. Can anything be blacksmith Dean Rantz of Rock Few sources exist that can tell us more about Mary, more whimsical than my destiny?” Village Forge is here forging a but she did keep a diary during a family visit to The officer helping Mary off the ship was likely its handrail for our new staircase. England in 1813-1814.1 It is through this travel 30-year-old Commanding Officer Robert Rowley.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoosiers and the American Story Chapter 5
    Reuben Wells Locomotive The Reuben Wells Locomotive is a fifty-six ton engine named after the Jeffersonville, Indiana, mechanic who designed it in 1868. This was no ordinary locomotive. It was designed to carry train cars up the steepest rail incline in the country at that time—in Madison, Indi- ana. Before the invention of the Reuben Wells, trains had to rely on horses or a cog system to pull them uphill. The cog system fitted a wheel to the center of the train for traction on steep inclines. You can now see the Reuben Wells at the Children’s Museum of Indianapolis. You can also take rides on historic trains that depart from French Lick and Connersville, Indiana. 114 | Hoosiers and the American Story 2033-12 Hoosiers American Story.indd 114 8/29/14 10:59 AM 5 The Age of Industry Comes to Indiana [The] new kind of young men in business downtown . had one supreme theory: that the perfect beauty and happiness of cities and of human life was to be brought about by more factories. — Booth Tarkington, The Magnificent Ambersons (1918) Life changed rapidly for Hoosiers in the decades New kinds of manufacturing also powered growth. after the Civil War. Old ways withered in the new age Before the Civil War most families made their own of industry. As factories sprang up, hopes rose that food, clothing, soap, and shoes. Blacksmith shops and economic growth would make a better life than that small factories produced a few special items, such as known by the pioneer generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony Mann, “How 'Poor Country Boys' Became Boston Brahmins: the Rise of the Appletons and the Lawrences in Ante-Bellum
    Anthony Mann, “How ‘poor country boys’ became Boston Brahmins: The Rise of the Appletons and the Lawrences in Ante-bellum Massachusetts” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 31, No. 1 (Winter 2003). Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/ number/ date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.westfield.ma.edu/mhj. Editor, Historical Journal of Massachusetts c/o Westfield State University 577 Western Ave. Westfield MA 01086 How ‘poor country boys’ became Boston Brahmins: The Rise of the Appletons and the Lawrences in Ante-bellum Massachusetts1 By Anthony Mann The promise of social mobility was a central cultural tenet of the northern American states during the nineteenth century. The stories of those who raised themselves from obscure and humble origins to positions of wealth and status, whilst retaining a sufficiency of Protestant social responsibility, were widely distributed and well received amongst a people daily experiencing the personal instabilities of the market revolution.2 Two families which represented the ideal of social mobility 1 A version of this essay was first read at the conference of the British Association for American Studies, Birmingham, and April 1997. My thanks to Colin Bonwick, Louis Billington, Martin Crawford and Phillip Taylor who have advised since then.
    [Show full text]
  • Women at the Looms: an Analysis of Gender, Capital, and Textiles in 19Th Century New England
    Women at the Looms: An Analysis of Gender, Capital, and Textiles in 19th Century New England William Amara May 1, 2017 A senior thesis, submitted to the History Department of Brandeis University, in partial fulfillment of the Bachelor of Arts degree. Introduction: Gender, Capital, and Textiles “I can see myself now” wrote Harriet Hanson Robinson in 1898, “racing down the alley, between the spinning-frames, carrying in front of me a bobbin-box bigger than I was”.1 Harriet Robinson was a woman who worked in the textile mills of Lowell, Massachusetts, beginning at age 10. Many years later, she wrote a detailed memoir chronicling how the world in which she lived had changed since her employment in the mills. According to Robinson, before the mills opened in Lowell, the people of New England led lives not much different from their ancestors: they travelled only as fast as a canal boat, often bartered instead of using money, and wore clothes made at home.2 Only a child, Harriet began working in the Tremont Corporation as a “doffer,” or someone who carried bobbins, the cylinders which held yarn, between the looms in 1831 after her father died. Although she worked from 5am to 7pm every day except Sunday, she moved the bobbins for 15 minutes and spent 45 minutes of each hour not working.3 While Harriet Robinson’s experience in a Lowell mill was exceptional because she recorded the details of it so vividly in her memoir Loom and Spindle, the conditions she encountered were shared by ​ ​ many other “mill girls.” Lucy Larcom was another young woman who worked in the textile mills of Lowell.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION DAWN of the INDUSTRIAL AGE a New Agricultural Revolution
    UNIT 3, SECTION 1: THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION DAWN OF THE INDUSTRIAL AGE A New Agricultural Revolution Improved Methods of Farming - 1700s - Dutch built earthen walls to reclaim water from the sea, combined smaller fields into larger ones to make better use of the land, used fertilizer from livestock to renew the soil • British farmers mixed soils to get higher crop yields, tried new methods of crop rotation • Lord Charles Townshend grew turnips to replenish the soil • Jethro Tull - invented the seed drill - deposited seeds in rows Enclosure Movement - enclosure - taking over and fencing off land formerly shared by peasant farmers - millions of acres were enclosed, farm output rose - profits rose because large fields needed fewer workers - farmers left villages in search for work in towns and cities The Population Explosion • Britain's pop. in 1700 = 5 million - in 1800 = 9 million • Europe's pop. in 1700 = 120 million - in 1800 = 190 million • Reasons: 1. declining death rate, 2. ag. rev. reduced the risk of famine, 3. women ate better-> were healthier, had stronger babies, 4. better hygiene, sanitation, 5. improved medical care New Technology An Energy Revolution • new energy sources used in the 1700s: coal - Thomas Newcomen - invented a steam engine powered by coal to pump water out of mines • 1769 - James Watt - improved steam engine - his engine would power the Indust. Rev. • Improved Iron - coal was a vital source of fuel in producing iron, a material needed for construction of machines and steam engines • 1709 - Abraham Darby - used coal to smelt iron (separate it from its ore) - discovered that coal gave off impurities that damaged iron -> found a way to remove impurities from coal - Darby's experiments led him to produced better-quality, less expensive iron (in decades that followed, this iron would be used in the building of railroads) BRITAIN LEADS THE WAY Why Britain? - five key factors: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Concord River History
    A Brief Concord River History Native Americans Lined by fertile lands and dotted with several good fishing sites, the lower stretch of the Concord River was at one time inhabited by large numbers of Native Americans, well before European settlers made their way across the Atlantic and inland from the coast. Seventeenth-century historian Daniel Goodkin claimed that before contact there were thousands of “Wamesit” making semi-permanent residence on the east side of the Concord, where it met the Merrimack. There they planted corn in the rich alluvial soil, fished “for salmon, shad, lamprey-eels, sturgeon, bass, and diverse others,” and hunted the reportedly abundant game in the surrounding woods. This group was one of two tribes in the area, with another, the “Pawtucket,” at Pawtucket Falls upstream on the Merrimack River. Both belonged to the Pennacook Middlesex Falls Confederacy, and their settlements swelled and shrank in size seasonally, as native visitors came and went with the migration cycles of the anadromous fish. In the 17th century, however, they were killed or run out of the river valley by fearful settlers. By 1726, native rights to the land along the Concord were nonexistent. East Chelmsford & Tewksbury Throughout the eighteenth century, the people of East Chelmsford, now downtown Lowell, were engaged primarily in farming and fishing. Joseph Fletcher and Jonathan Tyler owned the land abutting the Concord River on the west side, some of which they planted or managed as woodlot (see Map 1). On the east side, in Tewksbury, was the “Old Yellow House,” a tavern and hotel where the Wamesit village once stood and where Saints Memorial Medical Center stands today.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalzell, Robert F., Jr. Enterprising Elite: the Boston Associates and the World They Made
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 4:37 a.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine Dalzell, Robert F., Jr. Enterprising Elite: The Boston Associates and the World They Made. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987. Pp. xviii, 298. Illustrations David G. Burley Volume 18, Number 1, June 1989 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1017836ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1017836ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine ISSN 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Burley, D. G. (1989). Review of [Dalzell, Robert F., Jr. Enterprising Elite: The Boston Associates and the World They Made. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987. Pp. xviii, 298. Illustrations]. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 18(1), 98–99. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017836ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1989 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Book Reviews/Comptes rendus latest addition to the fleets. Ironically, the too small and the contextual information too classes and class consciousness. piers into the Hudson River had become so laconic. In fact, when one sits to read this Entrepreneurial innovation and class long and the strait so narrow by the book one would be well advised to have at formation, thus, expressed a cultural and continuous infilling of the waterlots to create hand a good, large tourist-style map of social conservatism.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Power in Lowell, Massachusetts
    WATER POWER IN LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS prepared by Patrick M. Malone Assistant Professor of American Civilization & History Brown University and Larry D. Lankton Assistant Curator, Power & Shop Machinery The Henry Ford Museum Photographs by Lyn Van Buskirk submitted to the Field Investigation Presentation of Subcommittee on National Parks and Recreation of the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs April 26, 1974 Lowell, Massachusetts became America’s first great industrial city because of the power of the Merrimack River. The textile mills which brought pros­ perity to early Lowell depended on water power delivered by a complex system of canals. These man-made waterways were, and still are, an engineering marvel. They greatly affected the patterns of urban development in Lowell and earned the city its reputation as the "Venice of America." An 1821 map of' "Pawtucket in the town of Chelmsford" shows the rural area which would soon become the city of Lowell. Here the Concord River joins the Merrimack below the Pawtucket Falls. Lowell historian Henry Miles described the falls as "a descent of thirty-two feet— not perpendicular, but over several rapids, in circuitous channels, with a violent current amidst sharp- pointed r o c k s . In earlier times the Indians had fished at the falls, but by the late eighteenth century the rapids seriously interrupted the flow of goods, principally lumber, that came down the Merrimack to Newburyport on the coast. In 1792 a corporation known as the Proprietors of Locks and Canals on the Merrimack River was established with a plan to by-pass this natural obstacle.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Life and Times of Francis Cabot Lowell, 1775-1817”
    The Offi cial Newsletter of Sanderson Lecture Series The Waltham 7:00 p.m., Tuesday Evening Historical Society May 10, 2011 RTN Federal Credit Union WALTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS Community Room May 2011 600 Main Street Waltham, MA 02453 Board of Directors Term: 2009-2011 The Edmund L. Sanderson Lecture Series Presents Co-Presidents Sheila E. FitzPatrick Wayne T. McCarthy “The Life and Times of Francis Treasurer Mary Selig Cabot Lowell, 1775-1817” Assistant Treasurer Jack Cox Recording Secretary with Mr. Chaim M. Rosenberg Leona Lindsay Corresponding Secretary Joe Vizard Join us for Chaim (Mike) Rosenberg’s story of the life and times of one of Waltham’s most signifi cant men. Fol- Curator Michelle Morello low Francis Cabot Lowell from his birth and early school- Assistant Curator ing to his days as one of the most prominent persons in Winifred W. Kneisel the Country. Membership Carol DiFranco This lecture will explain the background history of the Board Members times, the major players in mercantile New England, and Ruth M. Arena the important undertakings of America’s fi rst Industrialist. Marie Daly Dr. Helene Day Edna L. Dolber Mike Rosenberg’s interest in the 19th century mill build- Maureen Gordon ings led him to speculate on the importance of industry Louise Hamilton Doors open at 6:30. A brief Virginia Hays in the development of Massachusetts. After giving up the Morton Isaacson business meeting will begin at Larry Logan practice of medicine he decided to devote his time to the Barbara Maloney study of the industrialization of Massachusetts. In 2007, 7:00 and the lecture will begin Frank Maloney immediately thereafter.
    [Show full text]