DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Football Attendance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2019 FOOTBALL ATTENDANCE 2019 National College Football Attendance 2 FBS 3 FCS 4 Division II 4 Division III 5 Team-By-Team Home Attendance 6 2019 NATIONAL COLLEGE FOOTBALL ATTENDANCE ALL NCAA TEAMS Total Change In Change In Teams Games Attendance Average Total Avg. Home Attendance, Division I-FBS 130 831 34,177,838 41,129 348,051 -380 FBS Neutral-Site Attendance 19 1,061,206 55,853 -244,811 1,436 FBS Bowl Game Attendance # 40 1,637,417 40,935 34,799 -158 NCAA DIVISION I-FBS TOTALS 130 888 36,831,692 41,477 124,181 -379 Home Attendance, Division I-FCS 124 707 5,147,515 7,281 353,741 -49 FCS Neutral-Site Attendance ^$ 15 495,678 33,045 53,883 1,488 FCS Championship Game 1 17,866 17,866 64 64 NCAA DIVISION I-FCS TOTALS 124 723 5,661,059 7,830 407,688 -23 NCAA DIVISION I TOTALS 254 1,611 42,492,751 26,377 531,869 -765 Home Attendance, NCAA Division II & 166 890 2,668,317 2,998 44,542 6 Division II Neutral-Site Attendance ^$ 13 106,401 8,185 -17,484 898 Division II Championship Game 1 3,415 3,415 -891 -891 NCAA DIVISION II TOTALS 166 904 2,778,133 3,073 26,167 -2 Home Attendance, NCAA Division III & 245 1,239 2,141,426 1,728 16,718 26 Division III Neutral-Site Attendance ^ 2 45,561 22,781 42,020 21,601 Division III Championship Game 1 1,362 1,362 -5,454 -5,454 NCAA DIVISION III TOTALS 245 1,242 2,188,349 1,762 53,284 57 Home Attendance, Reclassifying Teams 4 20 78,469 3,923 -58,338 -4,627 NATIONAL TOTALS FOR 2019 & 669 3,777 47,537,702 12,586 552,982 -82 * Record. # Bowl attendance also includes one games that was also counted in “home” attendance (Hawaii Bowl at Hawaii and Boca Raton Bowl at Fla. Atlantic). ^ Championship Games counted separately. $ Three neutral-site games involving FCS team against Division II team are included in FCS Neutral-Site attendance and totals. & Does not include provisional teams. CHAMPIONSHIP ATTENDANCE: The total attendance for the Division I FCS Championship was 194,388 for a 8,452 average over 23 games, the Division II Championship was 70,890 for a 2,626 average over 27 games and the Division III Championship was 53,087 for a 1,712 average over 31 games. 2019 National College Football Attendance 2 FBS HOME ATTENDANCE TEAM No. School Games Attendance 22. Southern California 13 762,917 LEADERS 23. Virginia 14 745,500 24. Iowa St. 13 744,550 Total Home Attendance 25. Washington 13 734,002 26. Kentucky 13 720,579 No. School Games Attendance Average 27. Oklahoma St. 13 718,547 1. Michigan 7 780,215 111,459 28. Arkansas 12 714,339 2. Penn St. 7 739,747 105,678 29. Virginia Tech 13 714,087 3. Ohio St. 7 723,679 103,383 30. Florida St. 13 710,377 4. Texas A&M 7 711,258 101,608 5. Alabama 7 707,817 101,117 6. LSU 7 705,892 100,842 LARGEST AVERAGE 7. Texas 6 577,834 96,306 8. Georgia 7 649,722 92,817 ATTENDANCE INCREASE FROM 9. Nebraska 7 625,436 89,348 10. Tennessee 8 702,912 87,864 PREVIOUS YEAR 11. Auburn 7 600,355 85,765 Change 12. Florida 6 508,103 84,684 No. School Games 2019 Avg. 2018 Avg. in Avg. 13. Oklahoma 6 499,533 83,256 1. Kansas 7 33,875 19,424 14,451 14. Clemson 7 566,074 80,868 2. Memphis 7 38,816 30,178 8,638 15. South Carolina 7 545,737 77,962 3. Minnesota 7 46,190 37,915 8,275 16. Wisconsin 7 535,301 76,472 4. Virginia 7 47,863 39,705 8,158 17. Notre Dame 7 534,017 76,288 5. BYU 6 59,547 52,476 7,071 18. Washington 7 477,668 68,238 6. North Carolina 6 50,500 43,622 6,878 19. Michigan St. 7 474,731 67,819 7. Cincinnati 6 35,985 30,519 5,466 20. Iowa 7 458,897 65,557 8. Syracuse 6 42,164 37,043 5,121 21. Iowa St. 7 418,561 59,794 9. Coastal Carolina 6 15,019 10,463 4,556 22. BYU 6 357,281 59,547 10. South Carolina 7 77,962 73,628 4,334 23. Southern California 6 356,150 59,358 11. SMU 6 23,633 19,383 4,250 24. Virginia Tech 7 408,049 58,293 12. Maryland 6 37,812 33,594 4,218 25. NC State 7 395,264 56,466 13. New Mexico St. 5 17,905 13,706 4,199 26. Mississippi St. 7 393,277 56,182 14. Baylor 7 45,517 41,336 4,181 27. West Virginia 6 335,443 55,907 15. Wyoming 6 23,007 18,880 4,127 28. Oklahoma St. 6 328,902 54,817 16. Texas St. 6 17,140 13,115 4,025 29. Missouri 7 379,119 54,160 17. Southern California 6 59,358 55,449 3,909 30. Purdue 7 378,147 54,021 18. Iowa St. 7 59,794 56,010 3,784 19. Colorado 6 49,573 45,809 3,764 20. Miami (OH) 5 17,794 14,253 3,541 ALL GAMES ATTENDANCE 21. Southern Miss. 5 24,765 21,615 3,150 (Home, Road, Neutral) 22. UNLV 6 19,864 16,823 3,041 23. UTEP 6 17,093 14,155 2,938 No. School Games Attendance 24. Louisiana Tech 6 20,439 17,525 2,914 1. LSU 15 1,280,985 25. Purdue 7 54,021 51,120 2,901 2. Ohio St. 14 1,192,291 26. Missouri 7 54,160 51,466 2,694 3. Alabama 13 1,173,240 27. La.-Monroe 6 16,728 14,210 2,518 4. Texas A&M 13 1,157,835 28. Florida 6 84,684 82,328 2,356 5. Michigan 13 1,152,522 29. Tulane 6 20,271 18,015 2,256 6. Penn St. 13 1,143,373 30. Rice 7 22,212 20,172 2,040 7. Georgia 14 1,139,382 8. Clemson 15 1,071,328 9. Auburn 13 1,055,713 CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE 10. Tennessee 13 1,055,406 11. Florida 13 1,026,152 Conference attendance includes home games and neutral 12. Wisconsin 14 1,022,075 site contests between two teams in the same conference. 13. Texas 13 990,282 Independents total includes home game totals and neutral site 14. Oklahoma 14 977,343 games between two independent teams. 15. South Carolina 12 935,032 Total Change 16. Notre Dame 13 921,702 No. Conference Teams Games 2019 Attend. Avg. In Avg. 17. Iowa 13 891,200 1. Southeastern 14 102 7,417,759 72,723 -1,271 18. Michigan St. 13 873,144 2. Big Ten 14 97 6,311,298 65,065 -311 19. Nebraska 12 850,967 3. Big 12 10 66 3,792,831 57,467 481 20. Oregon 14 789,941 4. Atlantic Coast 14 93 4,486,578 48,243 -577 21. Mississippi St. 13 789,761 5. Pac-12 12 78 3,594,265 46,080 -362 FBS 3 Total Change Total Change No. Conference Teams Games 2019 Attend. Avg. In Avg. No. Conference Teams Games 2019 Attend. Avg. In Avg. 6. American 12 74 2,182,703 29,496 594 10. Mid-American 12 69 1,071,587 15,530 72 7. Mountain West 12 76 1,765,616 23,232 -630 FBS Independent# 6 36 1,333,374 37,038 -948 8. Conference USA 14 87 1,646,839 18,929 55 **All conferences record. *Conference record. # Different alignment than in 9. Sun Belt 10 62 1,137,224 18,342 961 previous year. FCS HOME ATTENDANCE LEADERS CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE No. School Games Attendance Average Conference attendance includes home games and neutral 1. Jackson St. 5 168,808 33,762 site contests between two teams in the same conference. Independents total includes home game totals and neutral site 2. Montana 7 157,812 22,545 games between two independent teams. 3. James Madison 9 162,974 18,108 4. Alabama St. 5 88,997 17,799 Total 2019 Change 5. North Dakota St. 9 156,962 17,440 No. Conference Teams Games Attend. Avg. In Avg. 6. Montana St. 8 138,246 17,281 1. Southwestern Athletic 10 52 793,835 15,266 26 7. Southern U. 4 67,826 16,957 2. Mid-Eastern# 9 47 459,743 9,782 -33 8. N.C. A&T 5 84,633 16,927 3. Big Sky 13 78 736,614 9,444 -156 9. Jacksonville St. 7 117,800 16,829 4. Colonial 12 74 660,808 8,930 -353 10. Florida A&M 6 99,223 16,537 5. Missouri Valley Football 10 66 589,249 8,928 -936 11. Delaware 7 99,926 14,275 6. Ivy 8 41 316,307 7,715 607 12. Alcorn 7 92,373 13,196 7. Ohio Valley 9 54 413,403 7,656 149 13. Yale 6 72,796 12,133 8. Southern 9 53 370,932 6,999 -612 14. Youngstown St. 7 84,150 12,021 9. Southland 11 64 436,917 6,827 -334 15. Norfolk St. 5 56,480 11,296 10.
Recommended publications
  • 11-Player Youth Tackle Rules Guide Table of Contents

    11-Player Youth Tackle Rules Guide Table of Contents

    FOOTBALL DEVELOPMENT MODEL usafootball.com/fdm 11-PLAYER YOUTH TACKLE RULES GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................2 1 Youth Specific Rules ..........................................................................3 2 Points of Emphasis ............................................................................4 3 Timing and Quarter Length ...........................................................5 4 Different Rules, Different Levels ..................................................7 5 Penalties ..................................................................................................7 THANK YOU ESPN USA Football sincerely appreciates ESPN for their support of the Football Development Model Pilot Program INTRODUCTION Tackle football is a sport enjoyed by millions of young athletes across the United States. This USA Football Rules Guide is designed to take existing, commonly used rule books by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) and the NCAA and adapt them to the youth game. In most states, the NFHS rule book serves as the foundational rules system for the youth game. Some states, however, use the NCAA rule book for high school football and youth leagues. 2 2 / YOUTH-SPECIFIC RULES USA Football recommends the following rules be adopted by youth football leagues, replacing the current rules within the NFHS and NCAA books. Feel free to print this chart and provide it to your officials to take to the game field. NFHS RULE NFHS PENALTY YARDAGE USA FOOTBALL RULE EXPLANATION 9-4-5: Roughing/Running Into the Roughing = 15; Running Into = 5 All contact fouls on the kicker/holder Kicker/Holder result in a 15-yard penalty (there is no 5-yard option for running into the kicker or holder). 9-4-3-h: Grasping the Face Mask Grasping, pulling, twisting, turning = 15; All facemask fouls result in a 15-yard incidental grasping = 5 penalty (there is no 5-yard option for grasping but not twisting or pulling the facemask).
  • African American Head Football Coaches at Division 1 FBS Schools: a Qualitative Study on Turning Points

    African American Head Football Coaches at Division 1 FBS Schools: a Qualitative Study on Turning Points

    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2015 African American Head Football Coaches at Division 1 FBS Schools: A Qualitative Study on Turning Points Thaddeus Rivers University of Central Florida Part of the Educational Leadership Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Rivers, Thaddeus, "African American Head Football Coaches at Division 1 FBS Schools: A Qualitative Study on Turning Points" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 1469. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/1469 AFRICAN AMERICAN HEAD FOOTBALL COACHES AT DIVISION I FBS SCHOOLS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON TURNING POINTS by THADDEUS A. RIVERS B.S. University of Florida, 2001 M.A. University of Central Florida, 2008 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in the Department of Child, Family and Community Sciences in the College of Education and Human Performance at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2015 Major Professor: Rosa Cintrón © 2015 Thaddeus A. Rivers ii ABSTRACT This dissertation was centered on how the theory ‘turning points’ explained African American coaches ascension to Head Football Coach at a NCAA Division I FBS school. This work (1) identified traits and characteristics coaches felt they needed in order to become a head coach and (2) described the significant events and people (turning points) in their lives that have influenced their career.
  • Eagles' Team Travel

    Eagles' Team Travel

    PRO FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME TEACHER ACTIVITY GUIDE 2019-2020 EDITIOn PHILADELPHIA EAGLES Team History The Eagles have been a Philadelphia institution since their beginning in 1933 when a syndicate headed by the late Bert Bell and Lud Wray purchased the former Frankford Yellowjackets franchise for $2,500. In 1941, a unique swap took place between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh that saw the clubs trade home cities with Alexis Thompson becoming the Eagles owner. In 1943, the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh franchises combined for one season due to the manpower shortage created by World War II. The team was called both Phil-Pitt and the Steagles. Greasy Neale of the Eagles and Walt Kiesling of the Steelers were co-coaches and the team finished 5-4-1. Counting the 1943 season, Neale coached the Eagles for 10 seasons and he led them to their first significant successes in the NFL. Paced by such future Pro Football Hall of Fame members as running back Steve Van Buren, center-linebacker Alex Wojciechowicz, end Pete Pihos and beginning in 1949, center-linebacker Chuck Bednarik, the Eagles dominated the league for six seasons. They finished second in the NFL Eastern division in 1944, 1945 and 1946, won the division title in 1947 and then scored successive shutout victories in the 1948 and 1949 championship games. A rash of injuries ended Philadelphia’s era of domination and, by 1958, the Eagles had fallen to last place in their division. That year, however, saw the start of a rebuilding program by a new coach, Buck Shaw, and the addition of quarterback Norm Van Brocklin in a trade with the Los Angeles Rams.
  • Injury Risk-Workload Associations in NCAA American College Football John Andrew Sampson University of Wollongong, Jsampson@Uow.Edu.Au

    Injury Risk-Workload Associations in NCAA American College Football John Andrew Sampson University of Wollongong, [email protected]

    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health Part B 2018 Injury risk-workload associations in NCAA American college football John Andrew Sampson University of Wollongong, [email protected] Andrew Murray University of Oregon, [email protected] Sean Williams University of Bath, [email protected] Travis Halseth University of Oregon J Hanisch Philadelphia Eagles See next page for additional authors Publication Details Sampson, J. A., Murray, A., Williams, S., Halseth, T., Hanisch, J., Golden, G. & Fullagar, H. H. K. (2018). Injury risk-workload associations in NCAA American college football. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21 (12), 1215-1220. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Injury risk-workload associations in NCAA American college football Abstract Objectives: To determine injury risk-workload associations in collegiate American Football. Design: Retrospective analysis. Methods: Workload and injury data was recorded from 52 players during a full NCAA football season. Acute, chronic, and a range of acute:chronic workload ratios (ACWR: 7:14, 7:21 and 7:28 day) calculated using rolling and exponentially weighted moving averages (EWMA) were plotted against non-contact injuries (regardless of time lost or not) sustained within 3- and 7-days. Injury risks were also determined relative to position and experience. Results: 105 non-contact injuries (18 game- and 87 training-related) were observed with almost 40% sustained during the pre-season. 7-21 day EWMA ACWR's with a 3-day injury lag were most closely associated with injury (R2 = 0.54).
  • Development, Evolution, and Bargaining in the National Football League

    Development, Evolution, and Bargaining in the National Football League

    DEVELOPMENT, EVOLUTION, AND BARGAINING IN THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE Thomas Sisco The National Football League [hereinafter: NFL] is the most popular professional sports organization in the United States, but even with the current popularity and status of the NFL, ratings and the public perception of the on-field product have been on steady decline.1 Many believe this is a byproduct of the NFL being the only one of the 4 major professional sports leagues in the country without a self-controlled system for player development. Major League Baseball [hereinafter: MLB] has a prominent and successful minor league baseball system, the National Hockey League has the American Hockey League and East Coast Hockey League, the National Basketball Association [hereinafter: NBA] has the 22 team development league widely known as “The D- League”, but the NFL relies on the National Collegiate Athletic Association [hereinafter: NCAA] to develop young players for a career in their league. The Canadian Football League and the Arena Football League are generally inadequate in developing players for the NFL as the rules of gameplay and the field dimensions differ from those of NFL football.2 NFL Europe, a developmental league founded by Paul Tagliabue, former NFL Commissioner, has seen minor success.3 NFL Europe, existing by various names during its lifespan, operated from 1991 until it was disbanded in 2007.4 During its existence, the NFL Europe served as a suitable incubator for a 1 Darren Rovell, NFL most popular for 30th year in row, ESPN (January 26, 2014), http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/10354114/harris-poll-nfl-most-popular-mlb-2nd, .
  • Post-Recession Decision-Making Associated with Adding NCAA Division I Sports Programs

    Post-Recession Decision-Making Associated with Adding NCAA Division I Sports Programs

    Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 2021, 14.1, 142-165 https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v14i1.13750 © 2021 the Authors Post-Recession Decision-Making Associated with Adding NCAA Division I Sports Programs Sloane Milstein1 and Zack Damon2 1Colorado Mesa University, 2University of Central Arkansas Recent college sport headlines highlight the decision to cut teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, a number of institutions are charging forward and have announced the addition of a team(s) to their athletic offerings. Plymouth State will add men’s swimming, Indiana Tech is adding women’s ice hockey, and Augustana College just added men and women’s water polo. Such additions are somewhat sur- prising given the difficult economic climate currently facing higher education and intercollegiate athletics. This study sought to identify a structure that NCAA Division I decision-makers took part in when adding a team in previous years. Accordingly, the authors conduct- ed expert-based, in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 15 Division I athletic administrators representing 23 sport teams. The following decision-making phases were identified: Identification, Justification, Evaluation, Acceptance (or Interrup- tions), and Authorization. Theoretical and practical implications for institutions seeking to grow their sport offerings are provided. Keywords: intercollegiate athletics, decision-making, athletic administration, NCAA, Title IX Researchers have examined the impact of removing college football programs at National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I institutions (Hutchin- son & Berg, 2015; Jones, 2014). Primarily associated with the theory of escalation of commitment, the decision-making process for the removal or addition of NCAA Division I sports have been well established (Hutchinson & Berg, 2015; Jones, 2014).
  • Bill Mccartney to Enter College Football Hall of Fame - Cubuffs.Com - Official Athletics Web Site of the University of Colorado

    Bill Mccartney to Enter College Football Hall of Fame - Cubuffs.Com - Official Athletics Web Site of the University of Colorado

    5/10/13 Bill McCartney To Enter College Football Hall of Fame - CUBuffs.com - Official Athletics Web site of the University of Colorado Bill McCartney will be inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame December 10 in New York. Photo Courtesy: CUBuffs.com Bill McCartney To Enter College Football Hall of Fame Release: 05/07/2013 Courtesy: David Plati, Associate AD/Sports Information BOULDER — Bill McCartney first set foot on the University of Colorado campus in Boulder McCartney Plati-'Tudes 2007 Interview in June 1982; little did he know CU Athletic Hall of Fame Profile at the time that just over a 2013 College Football Hall of Fame Class dozen years later he would retire as the winningest coach in CU football history. And now the turnaround “Mac” orchestrated in Boulder with a program that won just 14 games over a six-year span to one that claimed three Big 8 Conference titles and the 1990 consensus national championship is being rewarded on college football’s biggest stage. Bill McCartney McCartney has been selected by the National Football Foundation for induction into the College Football Hall of Fame this December 10 in New York City. He will join 12 players and two coaches in the Class of 2013. www.cubuffs.com/ViewArticle.dbml?PRINTABLE_PAGE=YES&ATCLID=207574760&DB_OEM_ID=600 1/9 5/10/13 Bill McCartney To Enter College Football Hall of Fame - CUBuffs.com - Official Athletics Web site of the University of Colorado He will become the seventh Buffalo enshrined in the Hall, joining Byron White (inducted in 1952), Joe Romig (1984), Dick Anderson (1993), Bobby Anderson (2006), Alfred Williams (2010) and John Wooten (2012).
  • 2020 Compass Media Networks College Football Format Trouble On

    2020 Compass Media Networks College Football Format Trouble On

    2020 Compass Media Networks College Football Format Trouble on GAMEDAY? Call 1-888-HELP-450 2020 CMN COLLEGE FOOTBALL FORMAT Station Breaks will have an outcue of: "This is NCAA Football on Compass Media Networks" There are 21 minutes for station sale. Network Breaks will have an outcue of: "You're listening to Compass Media Networks, your home for NCAA football" Technical information and relay closures are at the bottom of the document. DATE TIME (EST) MATCH-UP CHANNEL Sat-September 12th 11:30am Syracuse @ North Carolina 111 Sat-September 19th 7:00pm Miami @ Louisville 111 Sat-September 26th 7:00pm Florida State @ Miami 111 Sat-October 3rd 3:00pm Texas A&M @ Alabama 111 Sat-October 10th 11:30am Texas vs. Oklahoma @ Cotton Bowl 111 Sat-October 17th 7:30pm Georgia @ Alabama 111 Sat-October 24th 11:30am Florida State @ Louisville 111 Sat-October 31st 6:30pm Mississippi State @ Alabama 111 Fri-November 6th 7:00pm Miami @ NC State 111 Sat-November 14th 3:30pm Baylor @ Texas Tech 111 Sat-November 21st 7:00pm Oklahoma @ Oklahoma State 111 Sat-November 28th 3:00pm Auburn @ Alabama 111 Sat-December 5th 7:30pm Baylor @ Oklahoma 111 Sat-December 12th 3:00pm Wisconsin @ Iowa 111 Sat-December 19th 11:30am BIG Ten Championship Game 111 2020 CMN NCAA FOOTBALL FORMAT Station Breaks will have an outcue of: "This is NCAA Football on Compass Media Networks” There are 21 minutes for station sale. Network Breaks will have an outcue of: "You're listening to Compass Media Networks, your home for NCAA football." PREGAME SHOW HALFTIME SEGMENT Pos #1 — (180)
  • Motivational Differences Among Traditional and Transfer Football Players

    Motivational Differences Among Traditional and Transfer Football Players

    St. John Fisher College Fisher Digital Publications Sport Management Undergraduate Sport Management Department Fall 2011 Motivational Differences Among Traditional and Transfer Football Players Nicholas Adrian St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/sport_undergrad Part of the Sports Management Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Adrian, Nicholas, "Motivational Differences Among Traditional and Transfer Football Players" (2011). Sport Management Undergraduate. Paper 30. Please note that the Recommended Citation provides general citation information and may not be appropriate for your discipline. To receive help in creating a citation based on your discipline, please visit http://libguides.sjfc.edu/citations. This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/sport_undergrad/30 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Motivational Differences Among Traditional and Transfer Football Players Abstract Motivation among football players drives a team to success or failure. Coaches must be able to create a positive environment that allows players to be motivated. It all starts from the top and trickles down. There are many different actions that coaches use to motivate their players on and off the field. Depending on which type of coaching style is used will determine the methods that are used to motivate. Players also have to have self-motivating traits that drive them to become better athletes. This study consisted of surveys of football players in Division III football. Transfer students and 4th year seniors were the population in this study.
  • A Model of Promotion and Relegation in League Sports

    A Model of Promotion and Relegation in League Sports

    A Model of Promotion and Relegation in League Sports John Jasina Claflin University School of Business Kurt Rotthoff Seton Hall University Stillman School of Business Last working version, final version published in: Journal of Economics and Finance Volume 36, Issue 2, April, Pages 303-318 The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com: http://www.springerlink.com/content/f6862826t6w54663/?p=7684fbc045744b4ba122f29165ab4 eff&pi=26 Abstract Sports leagues in different parts of the world are set up in different ways, some as open leagues and some as closed leagues. It has been shown that spending on players is higher in open leagues (Szymanski and Ross 2000 and Szymanski and Valletti 2005). This paper extends these studies, finding that sports leagues that practice promotion and relegation will have unambiguously higher aggregate spending on player talent than closed leagues. This will lower profits in the open league, but increase fan welfare. John Jasina is can be contacted at: [email protected], Claflin University, 400 Magnolia St., Orangeburg, SC 29115 and Kurt Rotthoff at: [email protected], Seton Hall University, JH 621, 400 South Orange Ave, South Orange, NJ 07079. We would like to thank Skip Sauer, Mike Maloney, Curtis Simon, and Hillary Morgan for helpful comments. Any mistakes are ours. 1 1. Introduction Most North American sports leagues are closed leagues that operate with a fixed set of teams every season. This differs from other leagues throughout the world that have open leagues that practice promotion, or a team from a lower division being promoted to a higher league, and relegation, where the lowest teams of a given division are demoted to a lower division.
  • Walter Camp Football Foundation Announces 2017 All-America Teams It Is the 128Th Edition of the Nation’S Oldest All-America Team

    Walter Camp Football Foundation Announces 2017 All-America Teams It Is the 128Th Edition of the Nation’S Oldest All-America Team

    For Immediate Release: December 7, 2017 Contact: Al Carbone (203) 671-4421 Follow us on Twitter @WalterCampFF Walter Camp Football Foundation Announces 2017 All-America Teams It is the 128th edition of the nation’s oldest All-America Team NEW HAVEN, CT – Led by 2017 Player of the Year Baker Mayfield, second-ranked Oklahoma has four players on the Walter Camp Football Foundation All-America Teams, the 128th honored by the organization. The nation’s oldest All-America squad was announced this evening on The Home Depot ESPN College Football Awards Show. In all, 33 different schools from nine conferences (including independents) were represented on the All-America First and Second Teams (a total of 52 players selected). Auburn had three honorees (1 First Team and 2 Second Team). Wisconsin had four Second Team All-America honorees, while top-ranked Clemson had three. Overall, the Atlantic Coast Conference had the most honorees (11), followed by the Big Ten (10) and Big 12 (9). The Walter Camp All-America teams are selected by the head coaches and sports information directors of the 130 Football Bowl Subdivision schools and certified by Marcum LLP, a New Haven-based accounting firm. Walter Camp Football Foundation President Michael Madera was pleased with the voting participation. “Once again, we had more than 80 percent of the FBS schools participate in this year’s voting,” Madera said. “We are very appreciative of the continuing cooperation of the coaches and sports information directors in our annual effort to honor the nation’s most outstanding college players.” Leading the First Team offensive unit is Mayfield, a senior quarterback who was also selected the 2017 Walter Camp Player of the Year.
  • College Football: 150 Years

    College Football: 150 Years

    COLLEGE FOOTBALL: 150 YEARS n what has been determined to be the first college football game, Rutgers Idefeated Princeton 6-4 on Nov. 6, 1869. The game was nothing like what fans see on the field today as 25 players from each team took the field at the same time to play a game that would be more associated with soccer than modern football. But since 1869, the game has evolved throughout the years, with changes to rules and equipment as well as innovation of how the game is played. Each development has played its role in shaping it into the magnificent sport that is now annually supported by tens of millions of fans. Former BYU head football coach LaVell Edwards spearheaded one of those major developments with his aggressive and innovative passing attack while coaching The college football world is in the midst of celebrating the 150th BYU from 1972-00. His deviation from traditional offenses led the Cougars to 19 anniversary of the sport. The sesquicentennial celebration showcases the conference titles, an overall record of 257- rich history and traditions of the sport and its contribution to American 101-3, the 1984 National Championship and a spot in the College Football Hall of society and culture. With tens of millions annual fans and more than Fame. 5.33 million people who have played college football since 1869, “Honestly, I don’t think people understand college football has become an integral part of the national landscape. how radical his decision was to commit fully to the passing offense,” said Ivan Maisel, ESPN senior writer and editor-at- large of ESPN College Football 150, at the 2019 BYU Football Media Day.