Personality Disorder: a Disease in Disguise
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2018, VOL. 123, NO. 4, 194–204 https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2018.1526235 REVIEW ARTICLE Personality disorder: a disease in disguise Lisa Ekselius Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Sweden ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Personality disorders (PDs) can be described as the manifestation of extreme personality traits that inter- Received 12 August 2018 fere with everyday life and contribute to significant suffering, functional limitations, or both. They are Revised 15 September 2018 common and are frequently encountered in virtually all forms of health care. PDs are associated with an Accepted 17 September 2018 inferior quality of life (QoL), poor health, and premature mortality. The aetiology of PDs is complex and KEY WORDS is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. The clinical expression varies between different PD ICD-11; personality types; the most common and core aspect is related to an inability to build and maintain healthy inter- disorders; personality traits; personal relationships. This aspect has a negative impact on the interaction between health-care profes- review article sionals and patients with a PD. From being discrete and categorical disease entities in previous classification systems, the current concept of PD, reflected in the newly proposed ICD-11, is a dimen- sional description based on the severity of the disturbed functioning rather than on the type of clinical presentation. Insight about the characteristics of PDs among medical practitioners is limited, which is partly because persons do not seek health care for their PD, but instead for other medical issues which are obscured by their underlying personality problems. What needs to be emphasized is that PDs affect both the clinical presentation of other medical problems, and the outcome of these, in a negative man- ner and that the integrated effects of having a PD are a shortened life expectancy. Accordingly, PDs need to be recognized in clinical practice to a greater extent than previously. Introduction In everyday clinical practice persons who think, feel, behave, or relate to others differently than the average person are identified. This deviation from the norm is a central feature in all personality disorders (PDs). Although using slightly dif- ferent formulations over the years, PDs are roughly character- ized by ‘a pervasive pattern of thought, feeling and behaviour that characterize an individual’s unique lifestyle and mode of adaptation, which deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual’s culture’ (1). Such characteristics obviously cre- ate problems for those who bear them. PDs are likely to have an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, appear to be sta- ble over time, and lead to impairment or distress (1,2). This review, which is an overview on PDs and the core problems these ultimately lead to, is commenced with some background information about the concept of personality and on the attempts that have been made to understand and to describe different characteristics of personality, how these characteristics can be structured and understood, and Professor Lisa Ekselius, winner of the Medical Faculty of Uppsala University about the deviations in normal personality that form the Rudbeck Award 2017 ‘for her extensive and excellent research in basic and basis for the different types of PD. Above all, the paper clinical psychiatry and for her immense capacity to motivate everyone around her to flourish’. focuses on problems met in primary and specialist health care. Such problems are common, and persons with PDs are CONTACT Lisa Ekselius [email protected] Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, University Hospital, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here. ß 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 195 known to be under-treated with respect to physical health that time whether psychiatry could explain abnormal behav- (3) and are over-represented in the group categorized as the iour in persons lacking acute psychiatric symptoms who had ‘difficult patient’ (4,5). committed a violent crime (14). The present paper argues that all health-care professionals During the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, need basic knowledge about manifestations of different per- several conceptual systems for normal and abnormal person- sonality traits, above all in the form of manifest PDs, as we alities emerged as the result of the work of European psy- know that such pathology has a negative effect on the inter- chologists and psychiatrists (e.g. Ribot, Heymans, Lazursky, action between the patient and health-care professionals in Schneider, and Sjobring).€ terms of communication, clinical assessment, treatment, and Theodule Ribot (1839–1916), a French psychologist, outcome (6). The patients’ suffering is considerable, and gen- described normal and abnormal characters. He pointed out erally they report a low QoL (7,8). Having a PD also infers a that a person’s character is stable from childhood into adult risk factor for premature mortality (9,10), which affects indi- life. Ribot described three primary personality types: the sen- viduals and incurs a high cost to society (11). sitive, the active, and the apathetic, all three of which were divided into subtypes (15). The Dutch scientist Gerard Heymans (1857–1930) applied A historic perspective of aberrant personalities empirical methods to the study of personality. He developed The large variation in the way individuals think, feel, and the Cube of Heymans, a description of a personality typ- behave has been recognized throughout antiquity. The terms ology. He defined personality types in three dimensions: for these characteristics have been diverse. For instance, ‘activity level’, ‘emotionality’, and ‘primary versus secondary Confucius (551–479 BCE) used the combination of ‘blood functioning’, with the last-mentioned dimension comparable and vital essence’. The Greek philosopher and naturalist to ‘extroversion/introversion’. These three dimensions are Theophrastus (c. 371 to c. 287 BC) used the term ‘characters’, represented on the x-, y-, and z-axes of the Heymans cube, and in eighteenth-century France the Galenus–Hippocrates where all combinations of the three dimensions defined term ‘temperament’ was reinstituted. The term ‘personality’ eight personality types (16). has been used since the eighteenth century to label distin- The contributions of Aleksandr Lazursky (1874–1917), a guishing qualities of a person (12). Russian psychologist, were not widespread because most of Pathological personalities have also generated interest his publications were in Russian and because of the political over the years. Since the fourth century BC, philosophers climate of the time. His major contribution was the descrip- have been trying to understand what it is that makes ‘us’ tion of the ‘endopsychic’ and ‘exopsychic’ aspects of person- what we are. Theophrastus, a scholar of Plato and Aristotle, ality. The endopsychic components represent the was the first to publish a systematic description of the multi- psychological functions (e.g. perception, memory, attention, faceted nature of personality types (12). A few hundred years thinking) that are mainly inborn; the exopsychic components later, Aelius Galenus (130–200 AD) linked Hippocrates’ four are the consequence of the interaction with the outside humours to personality characteristics in his description of world. The interplay between these two aspects of personal- sanguine, phlegmatic, choleric, and melancholic tempera- ity determines how a person functions in an integrated social ments. He proposed that each of these four body fluids held context (17). a combination of two properties split along two axes: tem- The German psychiatrist Kurt Schneider (1887–1967) perature (hot/cold) and humidity (wet/dry). The humoral focused on diagnostic issues that included concepts of pathology system influenced the view among European doc- ‘psychopathy’, which he had broadly equated to PDs. Based tors until the breakthrough of medical science in the nine- on his clinical views (18), he vaguely defined abnormal per- teenth century. sonality as a statistical deviation from the norm. He proposed In the early nineteenth century, Franz Joseph Gall 10 psychopathic personalities, all of which are very similar to (1758–1828), a German neuroanatomist, thought that some those in the current classifications of PDs in the DSM-5 and brain areas were associated with specific functions. He also ICD-10 (19). thought that measurements of the skull represented differen- Henrik Sjobring€ (1879–1956), a Swedish psychiatrist, sug- ces in the individual’s personality (13). gested four constitution factors of the personality: capacity Philippe Pinel (1745–1826), a French physician, was the (intelligence), validity (psychic energy), stability (balance in first to include an aberrant personality in the nosology of keynote), and solidity (firmness, tardiness, tenacity). By these psychiatry (14). Pinel introduced the term ‘manie sans delire’ variables, all persons can be categorized as either normal,