DOCSLIB.ORG

TACOMA WATERFRONT Public Access Alternatives Plan Public Access Alternatives Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TACOMA WATERFRONT Public Access Alternatives Plan Public Access Alternatives Plan TACOMA WATERFRONT Public Access Alternatives Plan Public Access Alternatives Plan The City of Tacoma’s Public Access Alternatives Plan (PAAL) is an implementation strategy associated with the Shoreline Master Program and Open Space Habitat and Recreation Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The PAAL describes an overall vision and implementation strategy for the City’s 46 miles of waterfront that will connect linear waterfront trail systems to City-wide and regional systems and enhance recreation opportunities for a multitude of uses and abilities. Past waterfront public access plans have been reviewed and incorporated herein to maintain continuity with the past while looking ahead to the future of Tacoma’s waterfront and the needs of our community. City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services Department Planning Services Division 747 Market Street, Room 345 Tacoma, WA 98402-3793 (253) 591-5030 www.cityoftacoma.org/planning The City of Tacoma does not discriminate on the basis of disability in any of its programs, activities, or services. To request this information in an alternative format or to request a reasonable accommodation, please contact the Planning and Development Services Department at (253) 591-5030 (voice) or (253) 591-5820 (TTY). Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Vision ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Plan Area --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Use of the Plan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Chapter 2: Existing Public Access ---------------------------------------------------------- 8 Chapter 3: Planned Public Access --------------------------------------------------------- 10 Section 1: Tacoma Narrows --------------------------------------------------------- 13 Section 2: Point Defiance Park ----------------------------------------------------- 19 Section 3: Ruston Way ---------------------------------------------------------------- 23 Section 4: Schuster Corridor -------------------------------------------------------- 29 Section 5: Thea Foss Waterway ---------------------------------------------------- 35 Section 6: Port Tideflats -------------------------------------------------------------- 43 Section 7: Northeast Tacoma and Marine View Drive ------------------------ 47 Section 8: Wapato Lake and Park -------------------------------------------------- 51 Chapter 4: Priorities for Providing New Shoreline Public Access ---------------- 55 Chapter 5: Implementation Strategy ----------------------------------------------------- 57 Chapter 6: Measuring Performance ------------------------------------------------------ 67 Chapter 7: Public Access Project List ----------------------------------------------------- 69 Chapter 8: Permitting Public Access Projects ------------------------------------------ 75 Chapter 9: Management Issues ------------------------------------------------------------ 77 1.0 INTRODUCTION VISION The City of Tacoma boasts a magnificent by roadways, railroad, steep slopes, or shoreline, offering a variety of waterfront industrial operations – and as a result, experiences for people of all ages and priority shoreline trail systems remain abilities. With over 46 miles of shoreline, incomplete. water and waterfront is one of the This plan memorializes the vision of past dominant characteristics of the City of planning documents while integrating them Tacoma and its urban form, as well as a into a single, unified approach to public locus of economic activity and a driver of waterfront access. This is a long‐term our City’s quality of life. comprehensive strategy to establish a While continuing to respect the past and citywide network of trails, parks, and the history of Tacoma’s waterfront, the City attractions that link different shoreline looks towards the future and the areas, from Tacoma Narrows to tremendous potential and opportunity that Commencement Bay, with connections lay ahead and the central role that the inward to city neighborhoods and outward City’s waterfront will play in the to regional trails. sustainability and quality of life of our Translating vision into reality will not be community and the prospect of a thriving, easy, but the benefits to the City will be resilient economy. great. Imagine a city in which youth can This plan articulates a strategy for bicycle safely from his or her home across developing an integrated, cohesive town to visit a friend; a city with an active waterfront public access system that builds mix of commercial, industrial and on past planning efforts and community recreational uses as well as new aspirations. Despite the significant efforts neighborhoods along the shoreline; a city and resources that have been devoted to with a wide variety of parks and open the creation of this system by the City of spaces, connected so that they are, in sum, Tacoma, the Foss Waterway Development one big park; a city where citizens gain a Authority, Metro Parks and the Port of first‐hand appreciation for active marine Tacoma, much of the public shoreline industries and international trade; a city remains inaccessible to our citizens – cutoff known for the environmental health of its shorelines. Imagine a city that is an attractive destination for cyclists and hikers from all over the region. 1 PUBLIC ACCESS ALTERNATIVES PLAN City of Tacoma CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Recognizing the importance of past rather as places for people to go and enjoy waterfront planning efforts, the sections the water. Decaying urban waterfronts are below memorialize and incorporate herein being revitalized to provide recreational the vision articulated in these community opportunities for city dwellers. They are documents, including the Shoreline Trails being transformed into active, vital areas Plan, Dome to Defiance Study, Ruston Way with new commercial and recreational Plan and Thea Foss Waterway Design and developments that open up the waterfront Development Plan. to people. Shoreline Trails Plan ‐ 1989 The Ruston Way shoreline is easily reached making it a prime area for revitalization. The Shoreline Trails Plan envisions an urban Once a thriving industrial district, changing pedestrian trail system lying within the technological and economic considerations shoreline districts, steep slopes and left the area virtually abandoned. Slowly, it gulches, from the Thea Foss Waterway is being rebuilt as private developers and north to Ruston Way, through Point public officials alike take advantage of its Defiance Park and south along the western magnificent setting, panoramic views, shores of Tacoma. wooded slopes and close proximity to neighborhoods. The Ruston Way shoreline The plan proposes a coordinated trail has the potential to become a unique urban system that will tie individual trail segments waterfront attraction and people‐oriented together into a unified, urban pedestrian area. network. The trail system will provide an alternative means of travel to and from The need for close‐in urban recreation shoreline areas and neighborhoods. The areas is increasingly important as energy trail segments will be linked together by supplies diminish and the cost of traveling connecting trails and, where this is not to more distant parks soars. Many people possible, by using nearby streets and drive several hours to enjoy water‐oriented sidewalks. The trail system is composed of a recreation because no or limited corridor trail, access trails, trailheads, trail opportunities are available close to home access points, viewpoints, shoreline access even though the city is located near the points and destination locations. waterfront. Ruston Way Plan ‐ 1981 The Ruston Way waterfront of Tacoma is a public resource that can satisfy the water‐ The waterfront areas of cities across the oriented recreational needs of citizens and nation are again being recognized as valued improve the livability of the city. The public resources. But this time not for their developments proposed in this plan for the potential for industrial development but Ruston Way shoreline area will enhance the 2 PUBLIC ACCESS ALTERNATIVES PLAN City of Tacoma CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION natural areas, strengthen the historical the economic vitality needed to turn Thea significance, provide optimum public access Foss Waterway into a showcase for Tacoma. to the water, maintain views and create The Waterway visually and physically opportunities for outdoor recreation and connects surrounding districts. The social interaction. Waterway’s historic past and working Dome to Defiance Study ‐ 1988 waterfront, combined with new cultural, recreational, residential, office and retail We would have a shoreside people‐place 5 uses, will create a lively, urban ½ miles long. No other waterfront in the environment. A linear waterfront park will Northwest would be as spectacular. This link together a variety of attractive, ground would not be all parks or all commercial level public activities and uses accessible to development. The shoreside people‐place all of Tacoma’s citizens and to the region. would be a unique blend of mixed uses Environmental cleanup and protection including industrial, commercial, residential measures are being integrated into and recreational. It would include both redevelopment, creating a safe, healthy, public and private areas. The identifying and sustainable environment. characteristic of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 WSTC Tolling Report and Tacoma Narrows Bridge Loan Update
    2021 WSTC TOLLING REPORT & TACOMA NARROWS BRIDGE LOAN UPDATE January 2021 2021 WSTC TOLLING REPORT & TACOMA NARROWS BRIDGE LOAN UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge 7 2020 Commission Action 7 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 7 SR 99 Tunnel 8 2020 Commission Action 8 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 8 SR 520 Bridge 9 2020 Commission Action 9 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 9 I-405 Express Toll Lanes & SR 167 HOT Lanes 10 2020 Commission Action 10 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 11 I-405 Express Toll Lanes & SR 167 HOT Lanes Low Income Tolling Program Study 11 Toll Policy & Planning 12 Toll Policy Consistency 12 Planning for Future Performance & Operations 12 Looking Forward To Future Tolled Facilities 13 2021 Tolling Recommendations 14 Summary of Current Toll Rates and Revenues by Facility 16 2021 Tacoma Narrows Bridge Loan Update 17 2019-21 Biennium Loan Estimates 17 2021-23 Biennium Loan Estimates 18 Comparison of Total Loan Estimates: FY 2019 – FY 2030 18 TNB Loan Repayment Estimates 19 2021 Loan Update: Details & Assumptions 20 Factors Contributing to Loan Estimate Analysis 20 Financial Model Assumptions 21 P age 3 2021 WSTC TOLLING REPORT & TACOMA NARROWS BRIDGE LOAN UPDATE INTRODUCTION As the State Tolling Authority, the Washington State Transportation Commission (Commission) sets toll rates and polices for all tolled facilities statewide, which currently include: the SR 520 Bridge, the SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge, the I-405 express toll lanes (ETLs), the SR 167 HOT lanes, and the SR 99 Tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commencement Bay Superfund Legacy: Collaboration, Restoration and Redevelopment in the Local Landscape
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research 2010 The ommeC ncement Bay Superfund Legacy: Collaboration, Restoration and Redevelopment in the Local Landscape Jenni Denekas University of Puget Sound Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Recommended Citation Denekas, Jenni, "The ommeC ncement Bay Superfund Legacy: Collaboration, Restoration and Redevelopment in the Local Landscape" (2010). Summer Research. Paper 51. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/51 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Commencement Bay Superfund Legacy: Collaboration, Restoration and Redevelopment in the Local Landscape Jenni Denekas 2010 Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Summer Research Grant Recipient I. Introduction Commencement Bay has a long history of industrial development, which has leant Tacoma its moniker “City of Destiny” as well as its notoriety as the home of the “Tacoma aroma.” This development has also shaped Tacoma’s current shoreline and overall appearance. Originally, the shoreline was primarily an expanse of tideflats and estuaries, with large shellfish and seabird populations and important salmon habitat. The tideflats have for thousands of years supported tribes such as the Puyallup, and more recently the region’s abundant natural resources and the deep waters of the bay enticed Western settlement. In spite of the 1854 Treaty of Medicine Creek, which supposedly granted the Puyallup the rights to the tideflats at the mouth of the Puyallup River, development by Western settlers quickly overtook the local landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Mitigation Into
    INCORPORATING AQUATIC HABITAT RESTORATION/MITIGATION INTO DREDGING PROJECTS G.B. Grette1, and M.E. Boyle2 ABSTRACT A substantial portion of the world’s dredging occurs in urbanized areas where aquatic habitats have been degraded by a range of necessary human uses. In recent years, urban waterfronts have been increasingly viewed as important habitat for a range of fish and wildlife species. For example, in Washington state the listing of Puget Sound Chinook salmon as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) has led to increased focus on restoring habitat in the individual sub-estuaries of Puget Sound, including the Puyallup River estuary in Commencement Bay. Navigation and remedial dredging provide unique opportunities for accomplishing cost-effective aquatic habitat restoration. These actions can be either mitigation for impacts to habitat caused by dredging or restoration in the absence of significant habitat impacts. In either case, the aquatic habitat that is constructed in conjunction with dredging is typically much higher quality than the existing altered habitat. This paper describes a number of large and small scale habitat restoration/mitigation projects that have been implement in Commencement Bay over the last 20 years in conjunction with dredging projects. Projects range from construction of beaches with dredge material to shoreline cutbacks to create salt marshes. Topics will include: technical biological criteria for designing and locating appropriate habitat; incorporating multiple non-habitat benefits into the restoration action such as beneficial use of dredge material; sequencing of dredging and restoration work to minimize costs; and lessons learned negotiating habitat design and location with federal and state resource agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruston, Washington Liome to an Asarco Smelter and Superfund
    Environmental Battlefield: Ruston, Washington liome to an Asarco Smelter and Superfund By Karen Pickett he reocnt success of movies such as "A Civil Action" and "Erin Brock­ T ovich" reflect a public endorsement of our current eJ!<l of environmemal regulation. They are the modern fairy tales, complete with heroes and heroines, an evil corporation to fight and helpless masses to save. The Holly­ wood version is a simplistic battle between good and evil , with helpless underdogs fighting corruption and power. But for real people who have survived the impact of these regulations, the picture is not always rosy and never simple. In theory, envitronmental policies make the world a better p lace. But unlike a Hollywood movie, when reality confronts the theory of NORTH environmental salvation, the result can be j' TACOMA messy and unexpected. I This paper will explore the collision of the­ ory and reality as it played out in the tiny town of Ruston, Washington. This community put real faces to the.oretical policies. W ith its tow­ ering industrial smokestack, Ruston became the rallying point for opposing ideologies and their different !histories. This discussion will illustrate the community's connection to the (,..-.. ... industrial base that built it; and how this his­ &.. tory shaped Ruston's reaction to modern envi­ ~ I General Locaiirm .tf'.l.p NORTH \ __ _ ronmental policies. There are no heroes or vil­ l lains in this story, just everyday people trying to weigh the many conflicting interests and Figure 1 complex theories that changed the course of this small town. K~ren Pickett h~ s been a resident in Ruston since 1985, along Ruston, only 5 blocks long, has a population of with her husbrmd Jim and daughter Lisa.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018
    SR 16, Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3, Congestion Study FINAL December 28, 2018 Olympic Region Planning P. O. Box 47440 Olympia, WA 98504-7440 SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 This page intentionally left blank. SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 Washington State Department of Transportation Olympic Region Tumwater, Washington SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study Project Limits: SR 16 MP 8.0 to 29.1 SR 3 MP 30.4 to 38.9 SR 304 MP 0.0 to 1.6 December 2018 John Wynands, P.E. Regional Administrator Dennis Engel, P.E. Olympic Region Multimodal Planning Manager SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 This page intentionally left blank. SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non- discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7082.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalco Passage Oil Spill Final Report
    Dalco Passage Oil Spill King County Intertidal Sediment Reconnaissance Survey Final Report Prepared by the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Marine and Sediment Assessment Group August 2005 Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division 201 S Jackson St. Ste 600 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 296-6519 Dalco Passage Oil Spill King County Intertidal Sediment Reconnaissance Survey Final Report Prepared by Scott Mickelson, Senior Water Quality Project Manager Marine and Sediment Assessment Group King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 600 Seattle, Washington 98104 206-296-8247 [email protected] August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Sample Collection 2 2.1 Station Locations and Positioning 2 2.2 Sample Collection and Handling 2 3 Sample Analysis 4 3.1 Sediment Conventionals 4 3.2 Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Trace Organic Compounds 4 3.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 4 4 Analytical Results 5 4.1 Sediment Conventionals 5 4.2 Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Trace Organic Compounds 5 4.2.1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 6 4.2.2 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) 6 4.2.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 6 4.2.4 Other Trace Organic Compounds 7 5 Summary 8 6 References 9 List of Figures Figure 1 – Sampling Locations List of Tables Table 1 – Sediment Conventional Results and Sample Metadata Table 2 – Sediment Chemistry Results List of Appendices Appendix A – Complete Analytical Results Appendix B – Quality Assurance Review Narrative i 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of intertidal sediment sampling and analysis on Vashon and Maury Islands and the mainland shoreline of south King County.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Wedge Historic District
    THE WEDGE HISTORIC DISTRICT From the National Register Nomination Summary Paragraph Tacoma, Washington lies on the banks of Commencement Bay, where the Puyallup River flows into Puget Sound. The city is 30 miles south of Seattle, north of Interstate 5, and 30 miles north of the capital city, Olympia. To the west, a suspension bridge, the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, connects the city to the Kitsap peninsula. Through the community, a main railroad line runs south to California and north to Canada, with another line crossing the Cascades into eastern Washington. The Tacoma “Wedge Neighborhood,” named for its wedge shape, is located between 6th Ave and Division Ave. from South M Street to its tip at Sprague Avenue. The Wedge lies within Tacoma's Central Addition (1884), Ainsworth Addition (1889) and New Tacoma and shares a similar history to that of the North Slope Historic District, which is north of the Wedge Neighborhood across Division Avenue, and is listed on the Tacoma, Washington and National Registers of Historic Places. LOCATION AND SETTING The Wedge Neighborhood is bounded by Division Avenue to the north and 6th Avenue to the south, both arterials that serve to distinguish the Wedge from its surrounding neighborhoods. To the east is Martin Luther King Jr. Way, another arterial, just outside of the district. The district boundary is established by the thoroughly modern MultiCare Hospital campus to the East. The development of the hospital coincides with the borders of the underlying zoning, which is Hospital Medical, the borders of which run along a jagged path north and south from approximately Division to Sixth Ave, alternating between S M St and the alley between S M St and S L St.
    [Show full text]
  • Updates to the Commencement Bay Nearshore / Tideflats Superfund Site
    Updates to the Commencement Bay Nearshore / Tideflats Superfund site U.S. Environmental Protection Agency January 2020 u "' ~ V\ I!! u Puget Sound Spring Beach Puget Sound Adelaide Gig Harbor Mirror Lake ~ :,: u Point Defiance Park Caledonia ;:: ' V\ ] ., 0. *Asarco ' > ' < Federal Way ~ ton ' ' ;;: -1,q'?,· llf Ruston Yards Commencement .,,. 1'_, S 348th St J'~ ~. o., Bay '\ Ji...,), o Northeast *Occidental Tacoma ' .,, ~ :;; z Hylebos Wat!?rway /' V, V, z * ;, l' ' ~I,,; ~ < C Sitcum Wate~ ay ._,f ::: -5 ,. ~ Mi lwaukee Waterway ,.Ji-., , 0. ; g * * z 0 * z !:!: > .,... Blair Waterway ,.< ;;s- ~ d d Ie Waterway Tacoma * S 12t h St MIiton Titlow *Thea Foss Waterway S 19th St 2mi Tacoma Tar Pits * Fife Fircrest The Commencement Bay Nearshore Tideflats (CB/NT) Superfund site is located in Tacoma and Ruston, Washington at the southern end of the main basin of Puget Sound. The site encompasses an active commercial seaport and includes 10-12 square miles of shallow water, shoreline, and adjacent land, most of which is highly developed and industrialized. The nearshore portion of the site is defined as the area along the Ruston shoreline from the mouth of Thea Foss Waterway to Pt. Defiance. The tideflats portion of the site includes the Hylebos, Blair, Sitcum, Milwaukee, St. Paul, Middle, Wheeler-Osgood, and Thea Foss waterways; the Puyallup River upstream to the Interstate-5 bridge; and the adjacent land areas. Contaminants in the CB/NT area originate from both upland and in-water sources. With industrialization, hazardous substances and waste materials have contaminated the land, water, and sediments in many areas of the bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Places Continuation Sheet NOV """8 Ma \ \
    .------------ I I~;e NPS Form 10-900 4M~~rOO24~18 (OCt. 1990) RECIEIVED United Slates Department of the Interior National Park Service .. • NOV National Register of Historic Places ·8. Registration Form INTERAGENCY RESOURCES DIVISION This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties a d distrietMMOO~I',SfOWJlQS,mplete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Fonn (National Register Bulletin lGA). Co pleJ;e88Cb item bV marlcing "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter onfycateqories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10.,9OOa).Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name __ dT"'a"cc<,o"m!lla... N""'a"'r"'r-'Ol:!w>:;sLBQ.r"-"'i"dOjq"'e'- ------------------- other names/site number _ 2. Location street & number Spann ina the Tae oma Narrows o not for publication city or town Tacoma o vicinity state Wash; ngton code ~ county _-"PCJ.j.eecIr:cC.eec- code Jl5..3..- zip code _ 3. Slate/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the NationaJ Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this IX] nomination o request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of Bert Thomas Swim
    The Return of Bert Thomas Swim Tacoma to West Seattle – 18.8 miles Swim coordination plan & Swim safety plan 5-7 June 2015 Swimmer Andrew Malinak Emergency Phone Numbers USCG Sector Puget Sound (SAR) 206-217-6001 USCG Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound 206- Not for public release redacted - release 6 June 2015 Return of Bert Thomas Swim Swim coordination plan Swim coordination plan Denitions Crew: includes swimmer, captain, swim manager, kayaker, and any support crew on the water in any capacity; does not include land-side support Swimmer: Andrew Malinak TSS: Traffic Separation Scheme USCG: US Coast Guard VTS: Vessel Traffic Service Escort vessels Primary escort Name: S/V XIPHIUS Captain: Peter Type: 33’ Tartan 10 Max cap: 12 person State reg: WN Secondary escort Name: TUESDAY Captain: Rotating position Type: 13’ Achillies RIB Max cap: 5 person State reg: WN Swim schedule The swim start will occur at one of the following times, based on forecasted weather conditions: • 6 June 2015 (Saturday) at 8:45am (first preference) • 7 June 2015 (Sunday) at 9:30am (second preference) • 5 June 2015 (Friday) at 8:00am (third preference) The swim is expected to last 7 to 9 hours. This duration will be affected by current speed and direction, wind speed and direction, vessel traffic, and other factors. June 2015 2 Return of Bert Thomas Swim Swim coordination plan Swim rrouteoute The swim will begin on Ruston Way in Tacoma, head west around Vashon Island, and return east to West Seattle to finish at Lincoln Park, north of the ferry terminal. See Figure 1 for approximate route.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commencement Bay Journey
    4/10/2017 A Commencement Bay Journey Washington Chapter APWA History Committee Pat Brodin John Carpita Bob Moorhead A: Tacoma Dome B: LeMay Car Museum A B C: Brown and Haley C D: Cable Stay Bridge E: Museum District D F: Thea Foss Waterway E G: 11th Street/Murray X Morgan Bridge F H: Old City Hall and Northern Pacific G Railway Headquarters Buildings H I: Foss Waterway Seaport Events Center Port of I J: TEMCO Grain Elevator Tacoma K: Old Town Tacoma J K Commencement Bay 1 4/10/2017 A: Tacoma Dome • Largest wooden building when completed in 1983. • Major upgrades planned for 2017-2018. • Large enough for indoor football. • Venue for state high school basketball championships. B: LeMay – America’s Car Museum • Opened in 2012. • More than 400 cars on display in 15 galleries. • Some say it has the appearance of the front fender of a 1958 Cadillac. 2 4/10/2017 C: Brown & Haley Candy • Harry L. Brown owned a small confectionery store. • J. C. Haley worked for Schilling and Company, a spice company, and had a flair for sales and advertising. • Their candy business was incorporated in 1914. • By 1916, Brown & Haley was marketing a full line of candy products. • Signature products include Almond Roca and Mountain Bars. D: Cable Stay Bridge • Opened in 1997. • Twin towers are 180 feet tall. • Two spans totals 707 feet. • One of only 13 such bridges in the nation. 3 4/10/2017 E: Museum District • Washington State History Museum 1996. • Museum of Glass 2002. • Bridge of Glass 2002.
    [Show full text]