“Contagium Vivum)(From Marcus Terentius Varro's (116-54 BC) “Animalia Minuta” And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Contagium Vivum)(From Marcus Terentius Varro's (116-54 BC) “Animalia Minuta” And American Journal of Urology Research Research Article A Brief Historical Survey of the “Contagium Vivum) (From Marcus Terentius Varro’s (116-54 B.C.) “Animalia Minuta” And Titus Lucretius Carus’ (C.94-C.54 B.C.) “Semina” To Louis Pasteur’s (1822-1895) and Robert Koch’s (1843-1910) “Germs” and “Bacteria” - Prof. Sergio M1* and Prof. Bertozzi MA2 120080 ZIBIDO SAN GIACOMO (Mi) - Italy 2Head of the Complex Operative Department at the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria of Pisa - Italy *Address for Correspondence: Prof. Sergio Musitelli, 20080 ZIBIDO SAN GIACOMO (Mi) - Italy, Tel: +39- 029-053-748; E-mail: Submitted: 27 November 2017; Approved: 02 January 2018; Published: 03 January 2018 Cite this article: Sergio M, Bertozzi MA. A Brief Historical Survey of the “Contagium Vivum) (From Marcus Terentius Varro’s (116-54 B.C.) “Animalia Minuta” And Titus Lucretius Carus’ (C.94-C.54 B.C.) “Semina” To Louis Pasteur’s (1822-1895) and Robert Koch’s (1843-1910) “Germs” and “Bacteria”. Am J Urol Res. 2018;3(1): 001-009. Copyright: © 2018 Sergio M, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. American Journal of Urology Research Th e insects were considered wonderfully perfect creatures since adorning a precious nail with the fi gure of “Phaeton and the quadriga Aristotle (384 - 322 B.C.). Galen (c.129- 199 A.D.) deals with them of the Sun” He states that an anonymous artist had realized the fi gure with a greatest admiration. However nobody did ever either imagine, so perfectly that an observer could see “the bits, the mouths, the front or suppose the existence of micro-organisms before Antony van - tooth that - to tell the truth - I did not succeed in seeing owing to the Leeuwenhoek (1632 - 1723), perhaps only a brief passage of Marcus smallness unless I put that wonderful beauty in full light” and adds: “It Terentius Varro’s “De re rustica” (On agriculture) excepted. Even was diffi cult for me to distinguish the sixteen legs of the horses clearly, Lucretius’ “semina morbi” and Gerolamo Fracastoro’s (1478 - 1533) but those, who succeeded in seeing them clearly could realize that “seminaria morbi” cannot at all be interpreted as if they were “living the articulations of each leg appeared to be perfect. However none creatures”, although invisible to the naked eye. First the “insects” of these legs represented a workmanship more perfect than that of a then the so called “infusoria”1 became the protagonists during the leg of a fl y! Moreover the art, which realized the leg of the fl y, fi lls the 17th century thanks to the accession of the “microscope”, so that entire insect, because the fl y lives, eats and grows”. Th is miracle that their observation brought to the demolition of Aristotle’s theory of the Divine Craft sman performs in a lowermost animal like a y,fl how “spontaneous generation” fi rst by Francesco Redi (1626 - 1698) at more astonishing and wonderful will appear in the higher animals? macroscopical level, then by Lazzaro Spallanzani (1729 - 1841) at 3 - Galen’s observation is really wonderful! All the more so microscopical level, thank to whose experiments and discoveries we because he never performed observations of insects3 and states: can affi rm that modern microbiology started. “I never dissected and would never try to perform dissections of 1 - Although there cannot be any doubt that the History of modern fl eas, worms, bees and ants. Indeed as I fi nd a lot of mistakes made Biology starts from the discoveries made thanks to the invention and by the anatomists in the description of the parts of bigger animals, the use of the instruments of optical magnifi cation, nonetheless it is the legitimate and reasonable suspicion arises that they made even no less true that the insects were the protagonists of the fi rst stage. greater mistakes in observing the littlest ones”. In these few lines one Aft er all the fi rst statement of an observation performed with the aid may surmise a criticism to Aristotle, although he respectfully doesn’t of a real magnifying instrument - if we exclude those performed by quote his name! Giovanni Rucellai (1475 - 1525) surely having recourse to a concave 4 - However Galen is quite wrong. Indeed one can fi nd just mirror and described by him in his little poem “Le api” (On the bees), in his works the fi rst attempts at a systematic research on these published by Gian Giorgio Trissino ( 1478- 1550) in 1539 - goes back “littlest animals”, which represented to him -and will represent to to the year 1610, when Galileo Galilei (1564 -1642) not only published all the biologist of the subsequent centuries till the 17th century -the his brief and fundamental treatise “Sidereus nuncius” (Th e sidereal lowermost class of the animals and were a kind of link between the nuncio), but also modifi ed his “occhiale” (spyglass), transferred his animal and the vegetal world. instrument from the observation of the infi nitely big, to that of what 5 - It is really impossible to analyse here all the pages that - in that time - was considered to be infi nitely little and described Aristotle dedicates to the study of these even littlest living creatures. the characteristics he had observed “in the eye of a certain insect” However we think that it is important to emphasize at least few of through the particular instrument, which he later called “occhialino” them, which we judge to be exceptionally interesting and such as (little glass) in the letter, with which he accompanied the gift of just to give the literally roaring measure of Aristotle’s genius. First of all an “occhialino” he sent to Federico Cesi (1585 - 1630) on September he succeeded in distinguishing male and female insects: “As for the 23/1624 insects -he writes4 -the males are littler than the females; they service *Expert of the History offi ce of the E.A.U: (European Association them at the back and it is diffi cult to separate them (during the sexual of Urology). I dedicate also this work to the memory of my adored intercourse)”. He did not succeed in seeing the eggs lied by the insects son Giulio, who was killed on May 14, 2012 by a criminal driver, who -this is true - however, aft er having correctly observed that “all the did not observe a STOP sign. insects that copulate bear larvae”5, he maintains that a particular kind of butterfl ies6 “lay a hard body that looks like a seed of bastard saff ron, **Head of the Complex Operative Department of Andrology at but is full of humour”, and it is worth observing that the average the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana. diameter of a bastard saff ron seed is less than 0,002 inch! 2 - Galileo’s “occhialino” was changed into “microscope” by 6 - As for the larvae, Aristotle’s statement is really exceptional: the members of the glorious “Academia dei lincei” (1603 -1630) “the animal -he affi rms - doesn’t develop from a particular part and the insects became the exceptionally fertile ground, in which of the larva, as it occurs in the hen eggs, but is the result of the the microscope fought its fi rst and exceptional battles and let the growth and diff erentiation of the entire larva”. Unfortunately he scientists discover the marvellous organization of these littlest bodies. did not succeed in observing the insect’s eggs and, by consequence, “Marvellous”, this is true, but not “unsuspected”! Indeed Galen inherited from his predecessors the theory of “spontaneous” and himself speaks of it2 on the occasion of the description of a cameo “equivocal generation”7, which survived till the 18th century, when 1. Micro - organisms that seemed to come into being “spontaneously” after “infusion” of herbs in water 4 Cf. De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis (On Hippocrates’ and Plato’s theories), V, 5, K. V, 540 2. Cf. De usu partium corporis humani (On the usefulness of the parts 5. Cf. Historia animalium (Description of animals), V, 19, 550b of the human body), XVII, 1, K. IV, 361- 362. 6. On the other hand we nowadays know that are not so few the ovovi- K. means “Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia, edited by Carl Gottlob Kühn, viparous and even viviparous insects Lipsiae, 1921 ff. The Roman numbers correspond to the volume; 7. Most probably he is alluding to the Bombyx he deals with a little the Arab ones to the chapter or the page later, but which cannot be identifi ed with the silkworm 3. It is worth observing that the term “insects” was referred to all the lower animals, from the real “insects” to the worms, which, on their 8. It was supposed to occur when the offspring of a kind of spontane- turn, also included the larvae. ously born insects derived from copulation SCIRES Literature - Volume 3 Issue 1 - www.scireslit.com Page - 002 American Journal of Urology Research it was fi nally demolished by Lazzaro Spallanzani (1729 - 1799). Yet page14, in which Aristotle describes what we call “acarus scabiei” (itch he had performed even more astonishing observations. Indeed few - mite), i.e. the Sarcoptes scabiei. “When the lice - he writes -are on lines below8 he states that “the female locusts lay their off spring into the point of forming15 little blisters appear, but without pus. Should the earth where they insert in advance the tube their tail is provided one incise them the lice come out” and adds that “in some men this with whilst the males are lacking in it” and proves to have correctly phenomenon causes a disease, should his body suff er from abundant observed the so-called “ovipositor”.
Recommended publications
  • The Legend of Romulus and Remus
    THE LEGEND OF ROMULUS AND REMUS According to tradition, on April 21, 753 B.C., Romulus and his twin brother, Remus, found Rome on the site where they were suckled by a she-wolf as orphaned infants. Actually, the Romulus and Remus myth originated sometime in the fourth century B.C., and the exact date of Rome’s founding was set by the Roman scholar Marcus Terentius Varro in the first century B.C. According to the legend, Romulus and Remus were the sons of Rhea Silvia, the daughter of King Numitor of Alba Longa. Alba Longa was a mythical city located in the Alban Hills southeast of what would become Rome. Before the birth of the twins, Numitor was deposed by his younger brother Amulius, who forced Rhea to become a vestal virgin so that she would not give birth to rival claimants to his title. However, Rhea was impregnated by the war god Mars and gave birth to Romulus and Remus. Amulius ordered the infants drowned in the Tiber, but they survived and washed ashore at the foot of the Palatine hill, where they were suckled by a she-wolf until they were found by the shepherd Faustulus. Reared by Faustulus and his wife, the twins later became leaders of a band of young shepherd warriors. After learning their true identity, they attacked Alba Longa, killed the wicked Amulius, and restored their grandfather to the throne. The twins then decided to found a town on the site where they had been saved as infants. They soon became involved in a petty quarrel, however, and Remus was slain by his brother.
    [Show full text]
  • La Logica Del Vivente in Maupertuis: Dall’Attrazione Newtoniana Al Determinismo Psicobiologico
    La logica del vivente in Maupertuis: dall’attrazione newtoniana al determinismo psicobiologico Federico Focher (Istituto di Genetica Molecolare “Luigi Luca Cavalli Sforza”, CNR, Pavia) Dopo aver rilanciato con successo la teoria epigenetica della generazione, reinterpretata alla luce dell’attrazione newtoniana e delle affinità chimiche (Vénus physique, 1745), Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis (1698-1759) approfondì le proprie indagini teoretiche nel campo della genesi degli organismi e delle specie nel Système de la Nature (1754). In quest’opera, al fine di conciliare il postulato di oggettività della scienza - che respinge il ricorso alle cause finali - con le evidenti proprietà teleonomiche degli esseri viventi, e riconoscendo nel contempo inadeguati a tale scopo i pur originali principii meccanicistici avanzati nella Vénus physique, Maupertuis propose un’ardita teoria panpsichista del vivente, di ispirazione spinoziana. Postulando quindi la materia viva, dotata di istinto e di sentimento, Maupertuis immaginò che una qualche forma di intelligenza o di memoria psichica, associata alla materia, dirigesse lo sviluppo dei viventi. Alla luce delle recenti scoperte della biologia, l’originale determinismo psicobiologico avanzato da Maupertuis nel Système de la Nature appare una geniale intuizione della logica dei processi genetici ed evolutivi. Keywords: Maupertuis, teleonomia, scienze della vita, storia della biologia, informazione genetica, panpsichismo, Buffon. Introduzione Mezzo secolo dopo la scoperta della legge della gravitazione universale
    [Show full text]
  • Timgad) , Founded at the Sunrise of Trajan’S Birthday Amelia Carolina Sparavigna
    Archaeoastronomical analysis of the Roman Colonia Marciana Ulpia Traiana Thamugadi (Timgad) , founded at the sunrise of Trajan’s Birthday Amelia Carolina Sparavigna To cite this version: Amelia Carolina Sparavigna. Archaeoastronomical analysis of the Roman Colonia Marciana Ulpia Traiana Thamugadi (Timgad) , founded at the sunrise of Trajan’s Birthday. 2019. hal-02004922v2 HAL Id: hal-02004922 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02004922v2 Preprint submitted on 2 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Archaeoastronomical analysis of the Roman Colonia Marciana Ulpia Traiana Thamugadi (Timgad) , founded at the sunrise of Trajan’s Birthday Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Politecnico di Torino Written 2 February 2019. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2555783 Revised 1 May 2019. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2656658 It was told that the Roman Colonia Marciana Ulpia Traiana Thamugadi (Timgad in Algeria), founded in 100 AD, had been oriented to the sunrise on the day of Trajan’s birthday, given as September 18. This Gregorian date corresponds to September 17 of the Julian Calendar. Here we use software such as CalSKY and Stellarium to investigate the sunrise azimuth and compare it to the direction of the decumanus of the Roman town.
    [Show full text]
  • Domitian's Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome
    Rising from the Ashes: Domitian’s Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome Lea K. Cline In the August 1888 edition of the Notizie degli Scavi, profes- on a base of two steps; it is a long, solid rectangle, 6.25 m sors Guliermo Gatti and Rodolfo Lanciani announced the deep, 3.25 m wide, and 1.26 m high (lacking its crown). rediscovery of a Domitianic altar on the Quirinal hill during These dimensions make it the second largest public altar to the construction of the Casa Reale (Figures 1 and 2).1 This survive in the ancient capital. Built of travertine and revet- altar, found in situ on the southeast side of the Alta Semita ted in marble, this altar lacks sculptural decoration. Only its (an important northern thoroughfare) adjacent to the church inscription identifies it as an Ara Incendii Neroniani, an altar of San Andrea al Quirinale, was not unknown to scholars.2 erected in fulfillment of a vow made after the great fire of The site was discovered, but not excavated, in 1644 when Nero (A.D. 64).7 Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo Barberini) and Gianlorenzo Bernini Archaeological evidence attests to two other altars, laid the foundations of San Andrea al Quirinale; at that time, bearing identical inscriptions, excavated in the sixteenth the inscription was removed to the Vatican, and then the and seventeenth centuries; the Ara Incendii Neroniani found altar was essentially forgotten.3 Lanciani’s notes from May on the Quirinal was the last of the three to be discovered.8 22, 1889, describe a fairly intact structure—a travertine block Little is known of the two other altars; one, presumably altar with remnants of a marble base molding on two sides.4 found on the Vatican plain, was reportedly used as building Although the altar’s inscription was not in situ, Lanciani refers material for the basilica of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Millet Use by Non-Romans
    Finding Millet in the Roman World Charlene Murphy, PhD University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31-34 Gower Street, London, UK WC1H 0PY [email protected] Abstract Examining the evidence for millet in the Roman empire, during the period, circa 753BC-610AD, presents a number of challenges: a handful of scant mentions in the ancient surviving agrarian texts, only a few fortuitous preserved archaeological finds and limited archaeobotanical and isotopic evidence. Ancient agrarian texts note millet’s ecological preferences and multiple uses. Recent archaeobotanical and isotopic evidence has shown that millet was being used throughout the Roman period. The compiled data suggests that millet consumption was a more complex issue than the ancient sources alone would lead one to believe. Using the recent archaeobotanical study of Insula VI.I from the city of Pompeii, as a case study, the status and role of millet in the Roman world is examined and placed within its economic, cultural and social background across time and space in the Roman world. Millet, Roman, Pompeii, Diet Charlene Murphy Finding Millet in the Roman World 1 Finding Millet in the Roman World Charlene Murphy, PhD University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31-34 Gordon Square, London, UK WC1H 0PY [email protected] “If you want to waste your time, scatter millet and pick it up again” ( moram si quaeres, sparge miliu[m] et collige) (Jashemski et al. 2002, 137). A proverb scratched on a column in the peristyle of the House of M. Holconius Rufus (VIII.4.4) at Pompeii Introduction This study seeks to examine the record of ‘millet’, which includes both Setaria italia (L.) P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Roman Calendar Dwayne Meisner, University of Regina
    The Evolution of the Roman Calendar Dwayne Meisner, University of Regina Abstract The Roman calendar was first developed as a lunar | 290 calendar, so it was difficult for the Romans to reconcile this with the natural solar year. In 45 BC, Julius Caesar reformed the calendar, creating a solar year of 365 days with leap years every four years. This article explains the process by which the Roman calendar evolved and argues that the reason February has 28 days is that Caesar did not want to interfere with religious festivals that occurred in February. Beginning as a lunar calendar, the Romans developed a lunisolar system that tried to reconcile lunar months with the solar year, with the unfortunate result that the calendar was often inaccurate by up to four months. Caesar fixed this by changing the lengths of most months, but made no change to February because of the tradition of intercalation, which the article explains, and because of festivals that were celebrated in February that were connected to the Roman New Year, which had originally been on March 1. Introduction The reason why February has 28 days in the modern calendar is that Caesar did not want to interfere with festivals that honored the dead, some of which were Past Imperfect 15 (2009) | © | ISSN 1711-053X | eISSN 1718-4487 connected to the position of the Roman New Year. In the earliest calendars of the Roman Republic, the year began on March 1, because the consuls, after whom the year was named, began their years in office on the Ides of March.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (340 BCE–1870 CE)
    270 4. Abstraction and Unification ∗ ∗ ∗ “O`uen ˆetes-vous? Que faites-vous? Il faut travailler” (on his death-bed, to his devoted pupils, watching over him). The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (340 BCE–1870 CE) “Omne vivium ex Vivo.” (Latin proverb) Although the theory of spontaneous generation (abiogenesis) can be traced back at least to the Ionian school (600 B.C.), it was Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) who presented the most complete arguments for and the clearest statement of this theory. In his “On the Origin of Animals”, Aristotle states not only that animals originate from other similar animals, but also that living things do arise and always have arisen from lifeless matter. Aristotle’s theory of sponta- neous generation was adopted by the Romans and Neo-Platonic philosophers and, through them, by the early fathers of the Christian Church. With only minor modifications, these philosophers’ ideas on the origin of life, supported by the full force of Christian dogma, dominated the mind of mankind for more that 2000 years. According to this theory, a great variety of organisms could arise from lifeless matter. For example, worms, fireflies, and other insects arose from morning dew or from decaying slime and manure, and earthworms originated from soil, rainwater, and humus. Even higher forms of life could originate spontaneously according to Aristotle. Eels and other kinds of fish came from the wet ooze, sand, slime, and rotting seaweed; frogs and salamanders came from slime. 1846 CE 271 Rather than examining the claims of spontaneous generation more closely, Aristotle’s followers concerned themselves with the production of even more remarkable recipes.
    [Show full text]
  • Varro's Roman Seasons
    Varro’s Roman Seasons Amelia Carolina Sparavigna To cite this version: Amelia Carolina Sparavigna. Varro’s Roman Seasons. 2019. hal-02387848 HAL Id: hal-02387848 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02387848 Submitted on 30 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. HAL, Submitted 30 November 2019 Varro's Roman Seasons A. C. Sparavigna1 1 Dipartimento di Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy The four seasons of the Roman calendar, as described by Marcus Terentius Varro, are different from our seasons, in the sense that they start on days which differ from those that we are using today. In his Books on Agriculture, Varro shows that the Roman seasons started on the Cross Quarter-days instead than on the Quarter-days of the year as it happens today. Besides the classic subdivision in four parts, in the Books on Agriculture we can also find the year divided into eight parts, that is eight seasons having quite different lengths. In our discussion of Varro's seasons we will compare the days he mentions for the separation of seasons to the Cross Quarter- and Quarter-days that we find in Celtic calendars.
    [Show full text]
  • New Yorkers Had Been Anticipating His Visit for Months. at Columbia
    INTRODUCTION ew Yorkers had been anticipating his visit for months. At Columbia University, where French intellectual Henri Bergson (1859–1941) Nwas to give twelve lectures in February 1913, expectations were es- pecially high. When first approached by officials at Columbia, he had asked for a small seminar room where he could directly interact with students and faculty—something that fit both his personality and his speaking style. But Columbia sensed a potential spectacle. They instead put him in the three- hundred-plus-seat lecture theater in Havemeyer Hall. That much attention, Bergson insisted, would make him too nervous to speak in English without notes. Columbia persisted. So, because rhetorical presentation was as impor- tant to him as the words themselves, Bergson delivered his first American lec- ture entirely in French.1 Among the standing-room-only throng of professors and editors were New York journalists and “well-dressed” and “overdressed” women, all fumbling to make sense of Bergson’s “Spiritualité et Liberté” that slushy evening. Between their otherwise dry lines of copy, the reporters’ in- credulity was nearly audible as they recorded how hundreds of New Yorkers strained to hear this “frail, thin, small sized man with sunken cheeks” practi- cally whisper an entire lecture on metaphysics in French.2 That was only a prelude. Bergson’s “Free Will versus Determinism” lec- ture on Tuesday, February 4th—once again delivered in his barely audible French—caused the academic equivalent of a riot. Two thousand people attempted to cram themselves into Havemeyer. Hundreds of hopeful New Yorkers were denied access; long queues of the disappointed snaked around the building and lingered in the slush.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 19 Greek, Carthaginian, and Roman Agricultural Writers
    Lecture 19 1 Lecture 19 Greek, Carthaginian, and Roman Agricultural Writers Our knowledge of the agricultural practices of Greece and Rome are based on writings of the period. There were an enormous number of writings on agriculture, although most of them are lost we know about them from references made by others. Theophrastus of Eresos (387–287 BCE) The two botanical treatises of Theophrastus are the greatest treasury of botanical and horticultural information from antiquity and represent the culmination of a millenium of experience, observation, and science from Egypt and Mesopotamia. The fi rst work, known by its Latin title, Historia de Plantis (Enquiry into Plants), and composed of nine books (chapters is a better term), is largely descriptive. The second treatise, De Causis Plantarum (Of Plants, an Explanation), is more philosophic, as indicated by the title. The works are lecture notes rather than textbooks and were presumably under continual revision. The earliest extant manuscript, Codex Urbinas of the Vatican Library, dates from the 11th century and contains both treatises. Although there have been numerous editions, translations, and commentaries, Theophrastus the only published translation in En glish of Historia de Plantis is by (appropriately) Sir Arthur Hort (1916) and of De Causis Plantarum is by Benedict Einarson and George K.K. Link (1976). Both are available as volumes of the Loeb Classical Library. Theophrastus (divine speaker), the son of a fuller (dry cleaner using clay), was born at Eresos, Lesbos, about 371 BCE and lived to be 85. His original name, Tyrtamos, was changed by Aristotle because of his oratorical gifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University
    Boise State University ScholarWorks History Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of History 1-1-2007 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University Publication Information Odahl, Charles Matson. (2007). "Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy". Connections: European Studies Annual Review, 3, 89-113. This document was originally published in Connections: European Studies Annual Review by Rocky Mountain European Scholars Consortium. Copyright restrictions may apply. Coda: Recovering Constantine's European Legacy 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl, Boise State University1 rom his Christian conversion under the influence of cept of imperial theocracy was conveyed in contemporary art Frevelatory experiences outside Rome in A.D. 312 until (Illustration I). his burial as the thirteenth Apostle at Constantinople in Although Constantine had been raised as a tolerant 337, Constantine the Great, pagan polytheist and had the first Christian emperor propagated several Olympian of the Roman world, initiated divinities, particularly Jupiter, the role of and set the model Hercules, Mars, and Sol, as for Christian imperial theoc­ di vine patrons during the early racy. Through his relationship years of his reign as emperor
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Authors 297
    T Ancient authors 297 is unknown. His Attic Nights is a speeches for the law courts, collection of essays on a variety political speeches, philosophical ANCIENT AUTHORS of topics, based on his reading of essays, and personal letters to Apicius: (fourth century AD) is the Greek and Roman writers and the friends and family. name traditionally given to the lectures and conversations he had Columella: Lucius Iunius author of a collection of recipes, heard. The title Attic Nights refers Moderatus Columella (wrote c.AD de Re Coquinaria (On the Art of to Attica, the district in Greece 60–65) was born at Gades (modern Cooking). Marcus Gavius Apicius around Athens, where Gellius was Cadiz) in Spain and served in the was a gourmet who lived in the living when he wrote the book. Roman army in Syria. He wrote a early first centuryAD and wrote Cassius Dio (also Dio Cassius): treatise on farming, de Re Rustica about sauces. Seneca says that he Cassius Dio Cocceianus (c.AD (On Farming). claimed to have created a scientia 150–235) was born in Bithynia. He popīnae (snack bar cuisine). Diodorus Siculus: Diodorus had a political career as a consul (wrote c.60–30 BC) was a Greek Appian: Appianos (late first in Rome and governor of the from Sicily who wrote a history of century AD–AD 160s) was born in provinces of Africa and Dalmatia. the world centered on Rome, from Alexandria, in Egypt, and practiced His history of Rome, written in legendary beginnings to 54 BC. as a lawyer in Rome.
    [Show full text]