Views Made Only Scant, Passing Reference to Him

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Views Made Only Scant, Passing Reference to Him Readex Report Searching for the Forgotten Movie Mogul: William Fox, Founder of Twentieth Century Fox By Vanda Krefft Biography Fellow at the Leon Levy Center for Biography at the City University of New York When I began work several years ago on my in-progress biography of William Fox (1879–1952), founder of Twentieth Century Fox, I knew I was in for trouble. Although Fox was arguably the most important of all the early movie moguls because of his foundational contributions to the art, technology and business of movies, he seemed to have largely disappeared from history. No serious biography of him yet existed, and most movie history overviews made only scant, passing reference to him. Personal papers? Fox left none. Studio archives? Successive management regimes threw away almost everything except minutiae from Fox's regime—keeping extras' contracts and the like, but none of the founder's correspondence or business files. As if all that weren't bad enough, the general field of early film history, especially from 1900 through the mid-1920s when Fox was highly active, was woefully under-cultivated. No wonder no one had ever written a William Fox biography. Still, there seemed to be good reasons to try. Through my 15-year friendship with Fox's niece, the late Angela Fox Dunn, I'd heard many lively stories about "Uncle Bill" and had learned about his staggering list of accomplishments. With tireless energy and prescient vision, Fox put an indelible stamp on the form and content of American motion pictures. It was Fox who laid the foundation for the Hollywood studio system by launching and largely paying for the U.S. Department of Justice antitrust lawsuit that in 1915 formally dissolved the monopolistic Motion Picture Patents Company: after that, anyone could legally make movies. In the mid-1910s, he created the screen's first brand-name sex symbol, Theda Bara, and made the world's first million dollar movie, A Daughter of the Gods. When World War I broke out and leading European film producers were forced to abandon their foreign markets, Fox led worldwide expansion of the American movie industry. During the 1920s, he developed sound-on-film technology, which remains the industry standard, gave important early career breaks to directors John Ford and Howard Hawks, built a chain of palatial movie theaters and made the what is widely considered be the greatest silent film, F.W. Murnau's Sunrise (1927). Equally important, the timing was right. With digital technology revolutionizing the process of retrieving the past, information about Fox's life promised to become far more accessible. Indeed, electronic research tools have made this project not only feasible but also endlessly interesting. Especially valuable—make that absolutely essential—have been newspaper databases such as America's Historical Newspapers , which allow one to see directly how communities nationwide, both small and large, responded to the cultural lightning bolt of motion pictures. Here are ads aimed at the heartland, chatty newspaper articles about personalities both in front of and behind the camera and surprisingly rich coverage of industry trends. By the mid- 1910s Americans had gone wild for the movies and their newspapers showed it. Data from America's Historical Newspapers helped me solve one of my big challenges, which was to figure out how exactly William Fox became so successful so quickly as a movie producer. Previously a prosperous New York area exhibitor and distributor, Fox began making movies in mid-1914 and in early 1915 formed the Fox Film Corporation, based in New York. Within a year's time, he had catapulted into the industry's front ranks and was turning out one feature film per week. The standard explanation has been that Fox, with shameless disregard for traditional morality, zeroed in on the lowest common denominator with a series of lurid, sex-themed melodramas that naturally made a fortune. Principally, the claim goes, Fox created slinky "vamp" (short for female vampire) Theda Bara out of struggling actress Theodosia Goodman, a nice middle-class Jewish girl from Cincinnati, and foisted her on the public with a preposterous story about being an Arabian siren born in the shadow of the Egyptian pyramids. The more I learned about Fox, the more that explanation bothered me. A true believer in the American dream who longed to overcome his Lower East Side slum background, Fox craved respectability and was very proper—old-fashioned even—in his personal conduct: he had only one wife whom he loved devotedly and he considered religious faith to be the wellspring of his worldly success. In fact, as evidence from America's Historical Newspapers shows, Fox didn't realize at first that he was making sensational movies—he thought he was making high- class art that bravely depicted important truths about human experience. His first big hit, A Fool There Was, which introduced Theda Bara and made her an overnight star, told the story of a happily married American diplomat who turns into a miserable drunken wreck after getting ensnared by a steamy seductress. Ads following the movie's release in January 1915 emphasized the credentials of the source material—noting that it was based on a hit play starring Robert Hilliard, which in turn had been inspired by a Rudyard Kipling poem—and touted the expensive costumes and fancy sets. The movie's male star, Edward Jose (sometimes misspelled "Hose") often got first billing. Morning Oregonian, 01-17-1915; Section 4; Page: 4; (Portland, Oregon) As for Theda, Fox initially tried to promote her as a celebrated European stage actress. That was nonsense, of course, and no less nonsense than the story about the Egyptian desert, but it was a distinctly different sort of nonsense. "Paris Actress Sensation in Gotham, " The Lexington Herald, 02-04-1915; Page 8 "Miss Bara was brought to America from the Paris 'house of thrills,' the famous Theatre Antoine..." reported The Lexington Herald. "She was the leading lady formerly of the well known Gymnase of Paris, where she became famed for her marvelous interpretations of extremely difficult roles." Publicity photos during early- to-mid 1915 showed Theda in stylish but demure clothing, with soft make-up and warm, friendly expressions. She was an artist, the Fox forces insisted. "In the Frame of Public Favor," Cleveland Plain Dealer, 06-27-1915; Page 70 Curiously, movie audiences didn't want this story about Theda and, asserting control through ticket sales, they seized her image and ran away with it. Only her vampire movies drew crowds to the theaters, and as a local exhibitor told the Montgomery Advertiser in an August 8, 1915 article, many patrons preferred to believe that Theda wasn't acting: "there are women in Montgomery whom I have heard refer to her as 'a buzzard'." Fox got the message and, by the end of 1915, was advertising Theda primarily as "The Vampire Woman" and sending out publicity photos, such as this one for The Galley Slave, of her in skimpy costumes and alluring poses. "Photoplays and Photo Players," The Anaconda Standard, 12-12-1915; Volume: XXVII; Issue: 100, Page 16. From that point on, Theda's image kept tilting more and more toward the occult, the arcane and the just plain weird, with references to an Arabian father, a shattering heartbreak in Europe and pets that included a whistling frog, a green cat from Peru and a sleep-walking orangutan ("Movieland," Montgomery Advertiser, February 29, 1916.) As Fox explained in a September 14, 1916 article in the Salt Lake Telegram, he was acceding to marketplace demand: "The public be pleased." Had he abandoned higher ambitions for the sake of money? Hardly. The story of Theda's background never stayed straight—sometimes she was Arab, sometimes French, sometimes Russian and sometimes even from Cincinnati—and the studio publicity scribes kept turning out stories wherein Theda kept trying to prove that she really was a nice person who simply worked very hard at her "art." Lest anyone doubt his motives, Fox stated them clearly in a May 14, 1916 article in New Orleans's Times- Picayune: "I shall hope and expect then to contribute to the permanent history of the screen things that will make my name entitled to the respect and attention of educated, well-bred people for generations to come." So there it was: Fox had succeeded at first unaware of his formula and then with lingering discomfiture over the way his movies were perceived in certain circles. Meeting popular tastes where they were, he nonetheless longed to pull them up to a higher plane. Information from America's Historical Newspapers points to a larger theme of Fox's career: the conflict between idealism and pragmatism. Ultimately, Fox would venture too far away from what he really wanted to do—shifting too much of his attention toward business and away from art, engaging in questionable stock market deals, and trusting people he knew he shouldn't trust. As a result, in 1930, he lost control of his two namesake companies, Fox Film and Fox Theatres. He never recovered, either personally or professionally. After that, history turned its back on him and began its long, sad process of forgetting. Published in February 2010 Volume 5, Issue 1 Tags Vanda Krefft William Fox Twentieth Century Fox America's Historical Newspapers The Lexington Herald Montgomery Advertiser Filed under American History Historical Newspapers Trends in Database Use.
Recommended publications
  • First Words: the Birth of Sound Cinema
    First Words The Birth of Sound Cinema, 1895 – 1929 Wednesday, September 23, 2010 Northwest Film Forum Co-Presented by The Sprocket Society Seattle, WA www.sprocketsociety.org Origins “In the year 1887, the idea occurred to me that it was possible to devise an instrument which should do for the eye what the phonograph does for the ear, and that by a combination of the two all motion and sound could be recorded and reproduced simultaneously. …I believe that in coming years by my own work and that of…others who will doubtlessly enter the field that grand opera can be given at the Metropolitan Opera House at New York [and then shown] without any material change from the original, and with artists and musicians long since dead.” Thomas Edison Foreword to History of the Kinetograph, Kinetoscope and Kineto-Phonograph (1894) by WK.L. Dickson and Antonia Dickson. “My intention is to have such a happy combination of electricity and photography that a man can sit in his own parlor and see reproduced on a screen the forms of the players in an opera produced on a distant stage, and, as he sees their movements, he will hear the sound of their voices as they talk or sing or laugh... [B]efore long it will be possible to apply this system to prize fights and boxing exhibitions. The whole scene with the comments of the spectators, the talk of the seconds, the noise of the blows, and so on will be faithfully transferred.” Thomas Edison Remarks at the private demonstration of the (silent) Kinetoscope prototype The Federation of Women’s Clubs, May 20, 1891 This Evening’s Film Selections All films in this program were originally shot on 35mm, but are shown tonight from 16mm duplicate prints.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline and Fall of the European Film Industry: Sunk Costs, Market Size and Market Structure, 1890-1927
    Working Paper No. 70/03 The Decline and Fall of the European Film Industry: Sunk Costs, Market Size and Market Structure, 1890-1927 Gerben Bakker © Gerben Bakker Department of Economic History London School of Economics February 2003 Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 6482 Fax: +44 (0)20 7955 7730 Working Paper No. 70/03 The Decline and Fall of the European Film Industry: Sunk Costs, Market Size and Market Structure, 1890-1927 Gerben Bakker © Gerben Bakker Department of Economic History London School of Economics February 2003 Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 6482 Fax: +44 (0)20 7955 7730 Table of Contents Acknowledgements_______________________________________________2 Abstract________________________________________________________3 1. Introduction___________________________________________________4 2. The puzzle____________________________________________________7 3. Theory______________________________________________________16 4. The mechanics of the escalation phase _____________________________21 4.1 The increase in sunk costs______________________________________21 4.2 The process of discovering the escalation parameter _________________29 4.3 Firm strategies_______________________________________________35 5. Market structure ______________________________________________47 6. The failure to catch up _________________________________________54 7. Conclusion __________________________________________________63
    [Show full text]
  • The Political History of Classical Hollywood: Moguls, Liberals and Radicals in The
    The political history of Classical Hollywood: moguls, liberals and radicals in the 1930s Professor Mark Wheeler, London Metropolitan University Introduction Hollywood’s relationship with the political elite in the Depression reflected the trends which defined the USA’s affairs in the interwar years. For the moguls mixing with the powerful indicated their acceptance by America’s elites who had scorned them as vulgar hucksters due to their Jewish and show business backgrounds. They could achieve social recognition by demonstrating a commitment to conservative principles and supported the Republican Party. However, MGM’s Louis B. Mayer held deep right-wing convictions and became the vice-chairman of the Southern Californian Republican Party. He formed alliances with President Herbert Hoover and the right-wing press magnate William Randolph Hearst. Along with Hearst, Will Hays and an array of Californian business forces, ‘Louie Be’ and MGM’s Production Chief Irving Thalberg led a propaganda campaign against Upton Sinclair’s End Poverty in California (EPIC) gubernatorial election crusade in 1934. This form of ‘mogul politics’ was characterized by the instincts of its authors: hardness, shrewdness, autocracy and coercion. 1 In response to the mogul’s mercurial values, the Hollywood community pursued a significant degree of liberal and populist political activism, along with a growing radicalism among writers, directors and stars. For instance, James Cagney and Charlie Chaplin supported Sinclair’s EPIC campaign by attending meetings and collecting monies. Their actions reflected the economic, social and political conditions of the era, notably the collapse of US capitalism with the Great Depression, the New Deal, the establishment of trade unions, and the emigration of European political refugees due to Nazism.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrie Rickey
    BOOK REVIEWS CARRIE RICKEY Twentieth Century Fox by Frederick Wasser Twentieth Century Fox is the third in Routledge’s eight- volume “Hollywood Centenary” series chronicling the creation of the film-production entities born as stand-alone movie studios and their evolution into the entertainment divisions of today’s transnational corporations. Fox was born a few years before Hollywood became the American film capital and would, by the time of its 2019 acquisition by Walt Disney, outlive the century for which it was named. Given its focus on colorful figures like William Fox, Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/fq/article-pdf/74/3/88/465034/fq.2021.74.3.88.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Darryl F. Zanuck, and Rupert Murdoch, the book promises dramas of hubris, Oedipal complexes, and political intrigue. Disappointingly, it lacks all three. Instead, the biggest sur- prise in this workmanlike book from Frederick Wasser is how much of the studio’s century—especially its commit- ment to movie palaces, newsreels, and wide-screen produc- tion—was put in place in the 1920s by founder William Fox (born Fuchs), Hungarian immigrant and onetime schmatta dealer. In 1904, a garment-industry associate, Sol Brill, ap- proached Fox about pooling their savings to buy an arcade in Brooklyn’s Bushwick neighborhood. On its second floor, amid the penny amusements, was a rudimentary theater showing one-reelers for a nickel. After their purchase, the crowds that Fox and Brill saw when they originally toured the property had disappeared, and Fox suspected that the seller had planted them (11).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the William K
    Guide to the William K. Everson Collection George Amberg Memorial Film Study Center Department of Cinema Studies Tisch School of the Arts New York University Descriptive Summary Creator: Everson, William Keith Title: William K. Everson Collection Dates: 1894-1997 Historical/Biographical Note William K. Everson: Selected Bibliography I. Books by Everson Shakespeare in Hollywood. New York: US Information Service, 1957. The Western, From Silents to Cinerama. New York: Orion Press, 1962 (co-authored with George N. Fenin). The American Movie. New York: Atheneum, 1963. The Bad Guys: A Pictorial History of the Movie Villain. New York: Citadel Press, 1964. The Films of Laurel and Hardy. New York: Citadel Press, 1967. The Art of W.C. Fields. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967. A Pictorial History of the Western Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1969. The Films of Hal Roach. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1971. The Detective in Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1972. The Western, from Silents to the Seventies. Rev. ed. New York: Grossman, 1973. (Co-authored with George N. Fenin). Classics of the Horror Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1974. Claudette Colbert. New York: Pyramid Publications, 1976. American Silent Film. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978, Love in the Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1979. More Classics of the Horror Film. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1986. The Hollywood Western: 90 Years of Cowboys and Indians, Train Robbers, Sheriffs and Gunslingers, and Assorted Heroes and Desperados. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Pub. Group, 1992. Hollywood Bedlam: Classic Screwball Comedies. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Pub. Group, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Classical Hollywood Cinema 1900'S-In The
    Early Classical Hollywood Cinema 1900’s-In the early 1900s, motion pictures ("flickers") were no longer innovative experiments/scapist entertainment medium for the working-class masses/ Kinetoscope parlors, lecture halls, and storefronts turned into nickelodeon. Admission 5 cents (sometimes a dime) - open from early morning to midnight. 1905-First Nickelodean -Pittsburgh by Harry Davis in June of 1905/few theatre shows in US- shows GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY Urban, foreign-born, working-class, immigrant audiences loved the cheap form of entertainment and were the predominent cinema-goers Some of the biggest names in the film business got their start as proprietors, investors, exhibitors, or distributors in nickelodeons.:Adolph Zukor ,Marcus Loew, Jesse Lasky, Sam Goldwyn (Goldfish), the Warner brothers, Carl Laemmle, William Fox, Louis B. Mayer 1906-According to most sources, the first continuous, full-length narrative feature film (defined as a commercially-made film at least an hour in length) was Charles Tait's biopic of a notorious outback bushranger, The Story of the Kelly Gang (1906, Australia)- Australia was the only country set up to regularly produce feature-length films prior to 1911.- 1907-Griffith begins working for Edision- Edwin S. Porter's and Thomas Edison's Rescued From the Eagle's Nest (1907)/ Griffith- Contributing to the modern language of cinema, he used the camera and film in new, more functional, mobile ways with composed shots, traveling shots and camera movement, split-screens, flashbacks, cross-cutting (showing two simultaneous actions that build toward a tense climax), frequent closeups to observe details, fades, irises, intercutting, parallel editing, dissolves, changing camera angles, soft-focus, lens filters, and experimental/artificial lighting and shading/tinting.
    [Show full text]
  • William Fox Files Personal Bankruptcy Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice and to Defraud the United States I.E., Bribing the Judge
    In re Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L.Ed. 1447 (1945); Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Fox Theatres Corp., 182 F.Supp. 18 (1960); Kaufman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,12T.C. 1114 (T.C. 1949); Kaufman v. United States, 233 F. Supp. 123 (1964); Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Fox Theatres Corp., 182 F.Supp. 18 (1960); United States v. Manton, 107 F.2d 834 (2nd Cir.1939). Fox Film Corporation October 29, 1929 ‐ “Black Tuesday” • “Stock Market Crash Traps Movie Czar in $91,000,000 Debt.” • December 6, 1929 Headline • 1932 –Fox Film Corporation files for bankruptcy • 1932 –Fox Theatres Corporation put into a receivership • 1936 – William Fox files personal bankruptcy Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice and to Defraud the United States i.e., Bribing the Judge William Fox J. Warren Davis rd Attorney: 3 Circuit Morgan S. Kaufman Court of Appeals Fox Theatres Corporation Receivership J. Martin Thomas Manton U.S. v. Manton, 107 F.2d 834 (1939) KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment Distinguished by Hull v. Cartin, Idaho, July 27, 1940 107 F.2d 834 [2] Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Conspiracy Object UNITED STATES v. A “conspiracy” constitutes an offense MANTON et al. irrespective of the number or variety of objects which the conspiracy seeks to attain or whether No. 111. any of the ultimate objects are attained. | Dec. 4, 1939. 8 Cases that cite this headnote Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Martin T.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the-deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0000 UMI HUGO FOX: A BIOGRAPHY OF A PROMINENT AMERICAN BASSOONIST DOCUMENT Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Musical Arts in the Graduate School of The O hio State University By Karen M. Crews, B.Mus., M. Mas. The O hio State University 2001 Document Committee: Approved by Professor Christopher Weait, Adviser Professor Russel Mikkelson ___ Adviser Professor Arved Ashby School of Music UMI Number 3011012 Copyright 2001 by Crews, Karen Mercedes All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the UCLA Festival of Preservation Catalog (PDF)
    FROM THE DIRECTOR THE UCLA FILM & TELEVISION ARCHIVE'S mission is to preserve and provide access to our collections. The biennial Festival of Preservation allows us to show pristine examples of our recent work as they were meant to be seen-by appreciative audiences on the big screen. This year's Festival is dedicated to Preservation Officer Robert Gitt-the man who since 1977 has put the Archive on the international map for excellence in film preservation and restoration. In 2005, he officially retired from University service. but will continue to work part-time. contributing his wealth of expertise to preservation and restoration projects for many years to come. A special evening on Saturday, July 29. hosted by film critic and historian Leonard Maltin. will celebrate Bob's singular career. This year is also notable because it is the last time the Festival will be presented in the James Bridges Theater. In early 2007, with construction funding from Mrs. Audrey Wilder. the Archive will move into a new home at the state-of-the-art Billy Wilder Theater at the Hammer Museum in Westwood, creating an incomparable center to celebrate the legacy of motion pictures. The 13th Festival of Preservation presents a wide selection of fascinating motion pictures. shorts, television and newsreels. Film directors range from Elia Kazan. Hal Roach and Orson Welles to Kenneth Anger and John Cassavetes. Stars include Carroll Baker, Clara Bow. Ronald Colman, Cary Grant, Laurel and Hardy, Burgess Meredith and Gena Rowlands. One television evening takes a rare look at Johnny Carson before THE TONIGHT SHOW.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Pages
    The ‘Fabulous’ Fox Theatre and Atlanta, 1929-1975 by Michael James Zarafonetis A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 14, 2010 Keywords: history, culture, film, architecture, Atlanta, Fox Theatre Copyright 2010 by Michael James Zarafonetis Approved by Lindy Biggs, Chair, Associate Professor of History David Carter, Associate Professor of History Larry Gerber, Professor Emeritus of History Carla Keyvanian, Assistant Professor of Architecture Abstract The Fox Theatre, currently one of Atlanta’s most prestigious performance venues and architectural icons, has stood at the corner of Peachtree Street and Ponce de Leon Avenue since its construction in 1929. Its fantastical aesthetic combines a monumental Arabesque exterior with various Middle Eastern interior decorative motifs. The opulence of the Fox was common to movie palaces around the country during their brief heyday in the 1920s. Relatively few of these palaces, however, have survived to become icons of their city like Atlanta’s “Fabulous” Fox. The Fox was originally conceived as a Shriners headquarters and community center, but spiraling construction costs forced the fraternal organization to lease the building’s auditorium to William Fox, which he would operate as a first-run movie theater. Economic troubles during the Great Depression bankrupted both William Fox and the Shriners, casting doubt over the future of the theater, but under new ownership and stable management in the mid-1930s it performed strongly. Both Atlanta and the Fox boomed during World War II, with the city assuming major military and industrial importance during wartime.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Communications Media
    History of Communications Media Class 6 History of Communications Media • What We Will Cover Today – Motion Pictures • Origins of Motion Pictures • The Emergence of Hollywood • The Studio System • Some Effects of the Feature Film – Radio Movies • Motion pictures create the illusion of continuous motion through: – The persistence of vision – the brain retains images cast upon the retina for 1/20 th to 1/5 th of a second beyond their removal from the field of vision – The Phi phenomena – that which causes us to see the individual blades of a rotating fan as a unitary circular form • Because of persistence of vision, we do not see the dark interface areas of a projection print as it moves through the projector Movies • Origins of Motion Pictures – Thomas Edison devised a kinetoscope that cast separate still photos on a screen one after the other so rapidly that the pictures seemed to be moving • Used the celluloid roll film produced by George Eastman in an endless loop • It was designed for its film to be viewed individually through the window of a cabinet housing its components Movies • Origins of Motion Pictures • The Nickelodeon, as Edison’s invention was known as, consisted of 15- to 20-minute programs consisting of a potpourri of unconnected scenes – The term, nickelodeon, was a combination of the initial price of admission with the Greek word for theater • These early films relied on the novelty effects of motion pictures to entertain viewers Movies • Origins of Motion Pictures – Thomas Armat and Charles Francis Jenkins invented the
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Brooklyn's Cultural Identity During Cinema's Silent Era, 1893-1928
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2014 City of Superb Democracy: The Emergence of Brooklyn's Cultural Identity During Cinema's Silent Era, 1893-1928. David Morton University of Central Florida Part of the Public History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Morton, David, "City of Superb Democracy: The Emergence of Brooklyn's Cultural Identity During Cinema's Silent Era, 1893-1928." (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4638. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4638 “CITY OF SUPERB DEMOCRACY:” THE EMERGENCE OF BROOKLYN’S CULTURAL IDENTITY DURING CINEMA’S SILENT ERA, 1893-1928 by DAVID D. MORTON B.A. East Stroudsburg University, 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2014 Major Professor: Amy Foster © 2014 David Morton ii ABSTRACT This study discusses how motion picture spectatorship practices in Brooklyn developed separately from that of any other urban center in the United States between 1893 and 1928. Often overshadowed by Manhattan’s glamorous cultural districts, Brooklyn’s cultural arbiters adopted the motion picture as a means of asserting a sense of independence from the other New York boroughs.
    [Show full text]