DOCSLIB.ORG

Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae) ZV-336 003-434 | fransen 04-01-2007 07:44 Pagina 3 Taxonomy, phylogeny, historical biogeography, and historical ecology of the genus Pontonia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae) C.H.J.M. Fransen Fransen, C.H.J.M. Taxonomy, phylogeny, historical biogeography, and historical ecology of the genus Pontonia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae). Zool. Verh. Leiden 336, 31.iii.2002: 1-433 figs. 1-257, plates 1-19.— ISSN 0024-1652, ISBN 90-73239-80-X. C.H.J.M. Fransen, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Nether- lands (e-mail: [email protected]). Key words: Crustacea; Decapoda; Caridea; Pontoniinae; Pontonia; taxonomy; phylogeny; historical bio- geography; historical ecology. Species of the genus Pontonia Latreille, 1829, are distributed in tropical and subtropical waters around the world, living in association with either molluscan or ascidian hosts. In the present taxonomic revision, Pontonia sensu lato is divided into six genera: Pontonia sensu stricto; Ascidonia gen. nov., Rostronia gen. nov., Dactylonia gen. nov., Odontonia gen. nov., and Bruceonia gen. nov. A total of 29 species is described and figured, four of which are new to science: Pontonia pilosa spec. nov., Dactylonia holthuisi spec. nov., Odontonia rufopunctata spec. nov., and O. seychellensis spec. nov. The division in six genera is based on a stepwise phylogenetic analysis using morphological charac- ters, performed using PAUP and McClade software. The hypothesized phylogeny is used to analyse the historical biogeography of the shrimps. A deduc- tive method using Brooks Parsimony Analysis (BPA) is performed with regards to the Atlantic and East Pacific areas. The distribution patterns in the Indo-West Pacific are tested against the three sce- nario’s explaining the ‘East Indies Triangle of maximum diversity’. The historical ecology of the shrimps is analysed using their hypothesized phylogeny. In analogy with the historical biogeographical analyais, a deductive BPA method was applied, measuring the fit of the shrimp phylogeny on the hypothesized host phylogeny at different taxonomical levels of the hosts. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Material and methods ........................................................................................................................ 5 3. Historical review .................................................................................................................................. 6 4. Morphology and terminology ....................................................................................................... 9 5. Phylogenetic analysis ......................................................................................................................... 9 5.1. Taxa .................................................................................................................................................. 9 5.2. Character state definition .................................................................................................... 10 5.3. Finding monophyletic groups .......................................................................................... 17 5.4. Intergeneric phylogenetic relations ................................................................................ 26 5.5. Intrageneric phylogenetic relations ................................................................................ 36 5.6. A complete cladogram .......................................................................................................... 41 5.7. Character evolution in retrospect .................................................................................... 42 6. Historical biogeography ................................................................................................................. 44 6.1. Biological characteristics ...................................................................................................... 44 6.2. Processes ...................................................................................................................................... 44 6.2.1. Vicariance ....................................................................................................................... 45 ZV-336 003-434 | fransen 04-01-2007 07:44 Pagina 4 4 Fransen. Revision of the genus Pontonia. Zool. Verh. Leiden 336 (2002) 6.2.2. Coalescence .................................................................................................................... 46 6.2.3. Dispersal .......................................................................................................................... 46 6.2.4. Non-allopatric speciation ........................................................................................ 46 6.2.5. Extinction ........................................................................................................................ 47 6.3. Distributional patterns ......................................................................................................... 47 6.3.1. The Atlantic and East Pacific area ....................................................................... 47 6.3.2. The Indo-West Pacific area ..................................................................................... 53 7. Historical ecology .............................................................................................................................. 56 7.1. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 56 7.2. The hosts ..................................................................................................................................... 58 7.3. Results .......................................................................................................................................... 62 7.4. Conclusions and discussion ............................................................................................... 67 8. Systematic account ............................................................................................................................ 68 8.1. Key to the genera ..................................................................................................................... 68 8.2. Pontonia Latreille, 1829 ......................................................................................................... 69 8.2.1. Key to the species of Pontonia Latreille ............................................................. 70 8.2.2. Pontonia chimaera Holthuis, 1951 .......................................................................... 71 8.2.3. Pontonia domestica Gibbes, 1850 ............................................................................ 80 8.2.4. Pontonia longispina Holthuis, 1951 ....................................................................... 93 8.2.5. Pontonia manningi Fransen, 2000 ........................................................................ 102 8.2.6. Pontonia margarita Smith, 1869 ............................................................................ 119 8.2.7. Pontonia mexicana Guérin, 1856 .......................................................................... 131 8.2.8. Pontonia pilosa spec. nov. ....................................................................................... 147 8.2.9. Pontonia pinnae Lockington, 1878 ...................................................................... 158 8.2.10. Pontonia pinnophylax (Otto, 1821) .................................................................... 172 8.2.11. Pontonia simplex Holthuis, 1951 ....................................................................... 190 8.3. Ascidonia gen. nov. ............................................................................................................... 201 8.3.1. Key to the species of Ascidonia gen. nov. ....................................................... 202 8.3.2. Ascidonia californiensis (Rathbun, 1902) ........................................................... 203 8.3.3. Ascidonia flavomaculata (Heller, 1864) .............................................................. 215 8.3.4. Ascidonia miserabilis (Holthuis, 1951) ............................................................... 227 8.3.5. Ascidonia pusilla (Holthuis, 1951) ....................................................................... 236 8.3.6. Ascidonia quasipusilla (Chace, 1972) .................................................................. 248 8.4. Rostronia gen. nov. ................................................................................................................ 258 8.4.1. Rostronia stylirostris (Holthuis, 1951) ............................................................... 260 8.5. Dactylonia gen. nov. ............................................................................................................. 270 8.5.1. Key to the species of Dactylonia gen. nov. ..................................................... 271 8.5.2. Dactylonia anachoreta (Kemp, 1922) ................................................................... 271 8.5.3. Dactylonia ascidicola (Borradaile, 1898) ............................................................ 282 8.5.4. Dactylonia holthuisi spec. nov. ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidian Cannibalism Correlates with Larval Behavior and Adult Distribution
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©1988 Elsevier Ltd. The final published version of this manuscript is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00220981 and may be cited as: Young, C. M. (1988). Ascidian cannibalism correlates with larval behavior and adult distribution. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 117(1), 9-26. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(88)90068-8 J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. £Col., 1988, Vol. 117, pp. 9-26 9 Elsevier JEM 01042 Ascidian cannibalism correlates with larval behavior and adult distribution Craig M. Young Department ofLarval Ecology. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Fort Pierce, Florida. U.S.A. (Received 24 March 1987; revision received 9 December 1987; accepted 22 December 1987) Abstract: In the San Juan Islands, Washington, solitary ascidians .that occur in dense monospecific aggregations demonstrate gregarious settlement as larvae, whereas species that occur as isolated individuals do not. All gregarious species reject their own eggs and larvae as food, but nongregarious species consume conspecific eggs and larvae. Moreover, the rejection mechanism is species-specific in some cases. Correla­ tion analysis suggests that species specificity of the rejection response has a basis in siphon diameter, egg density, and larval size, but not in number of oral tentacles, or tentacle branching. One strongly cannibalistic species, Corella inflata Huntsman, avoids consuming its own eggs and newly released tadpoles by a unique brooding mechanism that involves floating eggs, negative geotaxis after hatching, and adult orientation. Key words: Ascidian; Cannibalism; Distribution; Larva; Settlement behavior INTRODUCTION Many sessile marine invertebrates, including filter-feeders such as mussels, oysters, barnacles and ascidians, occur in discrete, dense aggregations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidiacea, Phlebobranchia, Corellidae) in the Southern Hemisphere with Description of a New Species
    Zootaxa 3702 (2): 135–149 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3702.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E972F88B-7981-4F38-803D-8F4F92FE6A37 The genus Corella (Ascidiacea, Phlebobranchia, Corellidae) in the Southern Hemisphere with description of a new species FRANÇOISE MONNIOT Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier Fr 75231 Paris cedex 05, France.E-mail : [email protected] Abstract In the Southern Hemisphere the species attributed to Corella eumyota, Traustedt, 1882 are likely more varied than previously expected. This ascidian species was described from specimens collected at Valparaiso (Chile). Until now it was considered as a widely distributed species in the southern hemisphere. New collections from Chile and the Antarctic area have allowed to separate two species and re-establish Corella antarctica Sluiter, 1905 as a valid species (Alurralde 2013).A morphological re- examination of many specimens from the MNHN collections and especially recent surveys as CEAMARC and REVOLTA confirms that Antarctic specimens from the Antarctic Peninsula and Terre Adélie obviously differ from sub-Antarctic material more varied than previously estimated. On the other hand, C. eumyota invasive in Europe (Lambert 2004) has been shown to be the same as specimens from Chile, New Zealand and other sub-Antarctic regions. The present morphological study compares Corella from different regions and describes a new species Corella brewinae n. sp that is found living mixed with C. eumyota populations. Key words: Ascidians, Corellidae, Antarctic, Sub-Antarctic, new species Introduction The genus Corella was created by Hancock (1870) for Ascidia parallelogramma Müller, 1776.
    [Show full text]
  • 102 Research Article Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine
    Research Article Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences Volume: 1 Issue: 2 (2015) 102-106 Two Decapod Crustacean Species, Pontonia pinnophylax (Otto, 1821) and Nepinnotheres pinnotheres (Linnaeus, 1758), Living Inside Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758 in Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea, Turkey) İzmir Körfezi’nde (Ege Denizi, Türkiye) Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758 İçerisinde Yaşayan İki Dekapod Krustase Türü: Pontonia pinnophylax (Otto, 1821) ve Nepinnotheres pinnotheres (Linnaeus, 1758) Türk Denizcilik ve Deniz Bilimleri Dergisi Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 (2015) 102-106 Okan AKYOL1, *, Ali ULAŞ1 1 Ege University, Faculty of Fisheries, Urla, Izmir, TURKEY ABSTRACT These rare species are being reported for Four specimens of Pontonia pinnophylax the first time in a certain area from the (Otto, 1821) and two specimens of Turkish seas. Nepinnotheres pinnotheres (Linnaeus, 1758) were collected from four noble pen Keywords: noble pen shell, Pontonia shells, Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758 off pinnophylax, Nepinnotheres pinnotheres, Urla coasts, Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea. new record, Aegean Sea. ÖZET Dört Pontonia pinnophylax (Otto, 1821) ve iki Nepinnotheres pinnotheres (Linnaeus, 1758) bireyi İzmir Körfezi (Ege Denizi) Urla kıyıları açıklarında dört pinadan (Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758) toplanmıştır. Bu nadir türler, Türkiye denizlerinden belirgin bir alanda ilk kez rapor edilmektedir Anahtar Kelimeler: pina, Pontonia pinnophylax, Nepinnotheres pinnotheres, yeni kayıt, Ege Denizi. Article Info Received: 10 June 2015 Revised: 11 December 2015 Accepted: 15 December 2015 * (corresponding author) E-mail: [email protected] 102 1. Introduction it has never been seen again since then. Species of the genus Pontonia Latreille, Thus, both species can be accepted as very 1829 are distributed in tropical and rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Giardiasis Importance Giardiasis, a Gastrointestinal Disease Characterized by Acute Or Chronic Diarrhea, Is Caused by Protozoan Parasites in the Genus Giardia
    Giardiasis Importance Giardiasis, a gastrointestinal disease characterized by acute or chronic diarrhea, is caused by protozoan parasites in the genus Giardia. Giardia duodenalis is the major Giardia Enteritis, species found in mammals, and the only species known to cause illness in humans. This Lambliasis, organism is carried in the intestinal tract of many animals and people, with clinical signs Beaver Fever developing in some individuals, but many others remaining asymptomatic. In addition to diarrhea, the presence of G. duodenalis can result in malabsorption; some studies have implicated this organism in decreased growth in some infected children and Last Updated: December 2012 possibly decreased productivity in young livestock. Outbreaks are occasionally reported in people, as the result of mass exposure to contaminated water or food, or direct contact with infected individuals (e.g., in child care centers). People are considered to be the most important reservoir hosts for human giardiasis. The predominant genetic types of G. duodenalis usually differ in humans and domesticated animals (livestock and pets), and zoonotic transmission is currently thought to be of minor significance in causing human illness. Nevertheless, there is evidence that certain isolates may sometimes be shared, and some genetic types of G. duodenalis (assemblages A and B) should be considered potentially zoonotic. Etiology The protozoan genus Giardia (Family Giardiidae, order Giardiida) contains at least six species that infect animals and/or humans. In most mammals, giardiasis is caused by Giardia duodenalis, which is also called G. intestinalis. Both names are in current use, although the validity of the name G. intestinalis depends on the interpretation of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Nematodes of Birds of Armenia
    Annals of Parasitology 2020, 66(4), 447–455 Copyright© 2020 Polish Parasitological Society doi: 10.17420/ap6604.285 Review article Nematodes of birds of Armenia Sergey O. MOVSESYAN1,2, Egor A. VLASOV3, Manya A. NIKOGHOSIAN2, Rosa A. PETROSIAN2, Mamikon G. GHASABYAN2,4, Dmitry N. KUZNETSOV1,5 1Centre of Parasitology, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Leninsky pr., 33, Moscow 119071, Russia 2Institute of Zoology, Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology NAS RA, P. Sevak 7, Yerevan 0014, Armenia 3V.V. Alekhin Central-Chernozem State Nature Biosphere Reserve, Zapovednyi, Kursk district, Kursk region, 305528, Russia 4Armenian Society for the Protection of Birds (ASPB), G. Njdeh, 27/2, apt.10, Yerevan 0026, Armenia 5All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Fundamental and Applied Parasitology of Animals and Plants - a branch of the Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV”, Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya str., 28, Moscow 117218, Russia Corresponding Author: Dmitry N. KUZNETSOV; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. The review provides data on species composition of nematodes in 50 species of birds from Armenia (South of Lesser Caucasus). Most of the studied birds belong to Passeriformes and Charadriiformes orders. One of the studied species of birds (Larus armenicus) is an endemic. The taxonomy and host-specificity of nematodes reported in original papers are discussed with a regard to current knowledge about this point. In total, 52 nematode species parasitizing birds in Armenia are reported. Most of the reported species of nematodes are quite common in birds outside of Armenia. One species (Desmidocercella incognita from great cormorant) was first identified in Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Prawn Fauna (Crustacea: Decapoda) of India - an Annotated Checklist of the Penaeoid, Sergestoid, Stenopodid and Caridean Prawns
    Available online at: www.mbai.org.in doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2012.54.1.01697-08 Prawn fauna (Crustacea: Decapoda) of India - An annotated checklist of the Penaeoid, Sergestoid, Stenopodid and Caridean prawns E. V. Radhakrishnan*1, V. D. Deshmukh2, G. Maheswarudu3, Jose Josileen 1, A. P. Dineshbabu4, K. K. Philipose5, P. T. Sarada6, S. Lakshmi Pillai1, K. N. Saleela7, Rekhadevi Chakraborty1, Gyanaranjan Dash8, C.K. Sajeev1, P. Thirumilu9, B. Sridhara4, Y Muniyappa4, A.D.Sawant2, Narayan G Vaidya5, R. Dias Johny2, J. B. Verma3, P.K.Baby1, C. Unnikrishnan7, 10 11 11 1 7 N. P. Ramachandran , A. Vairamani , A. Palanichamy , M. Radhakrishnan and B. Raju 1CMFRI HQ, Cochin, 2Mumbai RC of CMFRI, 3Visakhapatnam RC of CMFRI, 4Mangalore RC of CMFRI, 5Karwar RC of CMFRI, 6Tuticorin RC of CMFRI, 7Vizhinjam RC of CMFRI, 8Veraval RC of CMFRI, 9Madras RC of CMFRI, 10Calicut RC of CMFRI, 11Mandapam RC of CMFRI *Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Received: 07 Sep 2011, Accepted: 15 Mar 2012, Published: 30 Apr 2012 Original Article Abstract Many penaeoid prawns are of considerable value for the fishing Introduction industry and aquaculture operations. The annual estimated average landing of prawns from the fishery in India was 3.98 The prawn fauna inhabiting the marine, estuarine and lakh tonnes (2008-10) of which 60% were contributed by freshwater ecosystems of India are diverse and fairly well penaeid prawns. An additional 1.5 lakh tonnes is produced from known. Significant contributions to systematics of marine aquaculture. During 2010-11, India exported US $ 2.8 billion worth marine products, of which shrimp contributed 3.09% in prawns of Indian region were that of Milne Edwards (1837), volume and 69.5% in value of the total export.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontoniine Shrimps Associated with Cnidarians: New Records and Hst of Species from Coastal Waters of Viet Nam
    Arthropoda Selecta 13 (4): 199-218 ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2004 Pontoniine shrimps associated with cnidarians: new records and Hst of species from coastal waters of Viet Nam KpeBeTKH-nOHTOHHHHbl aCCOIJHHpOBaHHbie C KHIUeHHOnOAOCTHblMH: HOBbie HaXOAKH H CnHCOK BHAOB H3 npH6pe>KHbIX BOA BbeTHaMa Ivan N. Marin^ Temir A. Britayev^ & Arthur Anker^ M.H. MapHH^ T.A. BpHxaeB^ H A. AHKep^ 'Laboratory of Ecology and Morphology of Marine Invertebrates, A.N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Leninsky prosp., 33, Moscow 117071 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Jla5opaTopHa SKOnorHH H Mop<J)OJiorHH MopcKHX 5ecno3BOHOHHbix, HncTHTyT npo5jieM SKOnorHH H SBOJIIOIJHH HM. A.H. CcBepijoBa PAH, JleHHHCKHH npocncKT, 33, MocKBa 117071 Poccna. ^Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada T6G 2E1. E-mail: [email protected] OaKyjibTCT 5HOJiorHH, ynHBepcHTeT niTaxa Ajib5epTa, S^MOHTOH Kanaka T6G 2E1. KEY WORDS: fauna, shrimps, Pontoniinae, Viet Nam, symbionts, cnidarian-associated. KJIIOHEBtlE CJIOBA: (jjayna, KpcBCTKH, Pontoniinae, BtcTnaM, CHMGnonTti, KHmcHnononocTntie. ABSTRACT. In the paper, the descriptions of 10 sp. n iiepnanTycoM Cerianthus sp. B c6opax c Kononnn species of cnidarian-associated pontoniine shrimps, new KopanjioB o6napy>Keno TaioKC Tpn Bn;ia KpcBCTOK n3 for the fauna of Viet Nam, are given. Coralliocaris pojiaPericlimenaeus (P. hecate, P. rhodope u P. quadri­ nudirostris and Philarius lifuensis are apparently associ­ dentatus), KOToptie npe;inoi[o>KnTein.no ne SLBJISLIOTCSL ated with acroporid corals, and Harpiliopsis spinigera is cnM6nonTaMn RnmcHnononocTntix, apaccMaTpnBaioTCH associated with pocilloporid corals. Palaemonella rotu­ KaK cnM6nonTi>i ry6oK n TynnxaT, npnKpenjiaioninxcH K mama axe found on both acroporid and pocilloporid KOJionnHM KopanjioB. TaKnM o6pa30M, c yncTOM namnx corals.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Insight on the Symbiotic Association Between the Fan Mussel Pinna Rudis and the Shrimp Pontonia Pinnophylax in the Azores (NE Atlantic)
    Global Journal of Zoology Joao P Barreiros1, Ricardo JS Pacheco2 Short Communication and Sílvia C Gonçalves2,3 1CE3C /ABG, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Azorean Biodiversity A New Insight on the Symbiotic Group. University of the Azores, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal Association between the Fan 2MARE, Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2520-641 Peniche, Portugal Mussel Pinna Rudis and the Shrimp 3MARE, Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences Pontonia Pinnophylax in the Azores and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal (NE Atlantic) Dates: Received: 05 July, 2016; Accepted: 13 July, 2016; Published: 14 July, 2016 collect fan mussels which implied that the presence of the shrimps was *Corresponding author: João P. Barreiros, evaluated through underwater observation of the shell (when slightly CE3C /ABG, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Azorean Biodiversity opened) or through counter light (by means of pointing a lamp). A Group. University of the Azores, 9700-042 Angra do previous note on this work was reported by the authors [4]. Presently, Heroísmo, Portugal, E-mail; [email protected] the authors are indeed collecting specimens of P. rudis in the same www.peertechz.com areas referred here for a more comprehensive project on symbiotic mutualistic/ relationships in several subtidal Azorean animals (work Communication in progress). Bivalves Pinnidae are typical hosts of Pontoniinae shrimps. Pinna rudis is widely distributed along Atlantic and Several species of this family were documented to harbor these Mediterranean waters but previous records of the association decapods inside their shells, especially shrimps from the genus between this bivalve and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an Updated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Taxonomic Paper Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist Chryssanthi Antoniadou‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou§§, Nicolas Bailly ‡ Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece § Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece Corresponding author: Chryssanthi Antoniadou ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 18 May 2016 | Accepted: 17 Jul 2016 | Published: 01 Nov 2016 Citation: Antoniadou C, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N (2016) Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Abstract Background The checklist of the ascidian fauna (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) of Greece was compiled within the framework of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS), an application of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) aiming to produce a complete checklist of species recorded from Greece. This checklist was constructed by updating an existing one with the inclusion of recently published records. All the reported species from Greek waters were taxonomically revised and cross-checked with the Ascidiacea World Database. New information The updated checklist of the class Ascidiacea of Greece comprises 75 species, classified in 33 genera, 12 families, and 3 orders. In total, 8 species have been added to the previous species list (4 Aplousobranchia, 2 Phlebobranchia, and 2 Stolidobranchia). Aplousobranchia was the most speciose order, followed by Stolidobranchia. Most species belonged to the families Didemnidae, Polyclinidae, Pyuridae, Ascidiidae, and Styelidae; these 4 families comprise 76% of the Greek ascidian species richness. The present effort revealed the limited taxonomic research effort devoted to the ascidian fauna of Greece, © Antoniadou C et al.
    [Show full text]