Het Schild Van Bedrog

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Het Schild Van Bedrog HET SCHILD VAN BEDROG Lessen van de operationele risico’s van de Britse contra-inlichtingen tijdens de Tweede Wereldoorlog W.J.P. van Lierop Juli 2015 Masterscriptie Geschiedenis Traject Nieuwste Geschiedenis Scriptiebegeleider: dr. B. von Benda-Beckman Tweede Lezer: dr. S. Kruizinga 1 Inhoudsopgave Inhoudsopgave ....................................................................................................................2 English abstraCt...................................................................................................................3 Inleiding.................................................................................................................................4 Huidige deFinities van het Contra-inliChtingen veld ............................................11 SNOW: het begin van het double-Cross systeem ...................................................17 TATE: de groei van het dubbelspel............................................................................27 TRICYCLE: de bedreigingen van je bondgenoten..................................................42 GARBO: de ‘oFFensieve CapaCiteiten’ van een dubbelspion................................59 ConClusie.............................................................................................................................75 Literatuurlijst ...................................................................................................................81 2 English abstract Scholars are still working on a useable theory of counterintelligence. This is because counterintelligence is made up out of several roles and practices viewed diffently by intelligence agencies. The current theory of counter-intelligence describes a couple of different aspects of the counterintelligence work: gathering information, a defensieve role and an offensive role. To add a usefull insight into the offensive aspect, by example of the running of double agents, this study focusses on running double agents on the operational level. In a history of the operational level of one of the most succesfull double agent operations, the British double-cross system in World War Two, this study analyses the risks and dilemma’s faced by the double agents’ controllers. As chairman of the double-cross comittee, J.C. Masterman wrote a report of the double-cross system in the Second World War and this report is viewed by the counterintelligence community as a handbook for the use of double agents in counterintelligence. The report reads as a straightforward development of the double-cross system, which resulted in British intelligence controlling the whole of the German spy apparatus in Great-Britain. But this straightforwardness is decieving. The history of the operational level teaches us that the development of the double-cross system was far more ad-hoc in nature. The study concludes that describing the double-cross System as a prime example of the offensive aspect of counter-intelligence is incorrect. The double-cross system was, at every point in its development, a defensive operation focussed on protecting allied military operations 3 Inleiding Elke grote gebeurtenis in de geschiedenis van de twintigste eeuw had zijn schaduwzijde. Deze schaduwzijde speelde in elk conflict in de twintigste eeuw een rol. De inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten van de grote natiestaten zorgden met behulp van infiltratie, spionage, en misleiding ervoor dat de intenties en plannen van hun eigen staten geheim blijven en die van de oppositie werden ontrafeld. In de Tweede Wereldoorlog speelden de inlichtingen en veiligheidsdiensten van de Britse staat een sleutelrol in het omverwerpen van Nazi-Duitsland. Een van de meest succesvolle operaties van de Britse veiligheidsdienst MI5 was het double- cross systeem. Het double-cross systeem is een tijdens de Tweede Wereldoorlog opgezette operatie die Duitse spionnen die naar de Britse eilanden werden gezonden, moest onderscheppen en neutraliseren. Veel van deze spionnen werden uiteindelijk ‘gekeerd’ waardoor ze voor de Britse dienst gingen werken. Onder het toeziende oog van een aantal case-officers werden deze dubbelagenten in staat gesteld om de Duitsers fictieve en foute informatie te verschaffen om zo de meeste militaire operaties van de geallieerden te laten beschermen door een “bodyguard of lies”.1 De Duitse militaire inlichtingendienst, de Abwehr, werd in 1920 opgericht als onderdeel van het Duitse ministerie van defensie. De dienst was primair gericht op contra-inlichtingen, het tegengaan van militaire spionage in Duitsland. Tot Hitler in 1935 aan de macht kwam in Duitsland was de Abwehr een relatief kleine organisatie en had, zeker op het gebied van Humint (Human intelligence; inlichtingen uit menselijke bron) nog geen voet aan de grond in Groot-Brittannië. De Britse Military Intelligence Service, MI5, en in het bijzonder de contra-inlichtingen afdeling B1, stond er aan het begin van de oorlog eveneens 1 Naar een uitspraak van Winston Churchill: “In war-time truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.” 4 weinig florisant voor. De dienst was klein en bijna niet uitgerust om de inmense taak van het opsporen en neutraliseren van Duitse spionnen naar behoren uit te voeren.2 Het double-cross systeem, dat zich gedurende de oorlog ontwikkelde bleek achteraf gezien een enorm succes. Nadat een aantal spionnen succesvol waren gerekruteerd tot dubbelspion, werd een overkoepelend comité opgericht om dagelijkse bezigheden van alle dubbelagenten te monitoren en berichtenverkeer dat naar de Duitse Abwehr werd verstuurd te controleren. Dit comité werd het Twenty Comittee genoemd, naar het Romeinse cijfer voor twintig; XX, twee kruizen, double-cross. Het comité bestond uit een afgevaardigde van iedere tak van de Britse inlichtingendienst en werd voorgezeten door Sir John. C. Masterman, een historicus uit Oxford. Dit comité functioneerde als ‘clearing house’ om de informatie te controleren die via dubbelagenten aan de Duitsers werd gevoed. Masterman stelde direct na de oorlog een rapport op over de werkzaamheen van het double-cross comité en het document kan worden gezien als ‘handleiding’ voor het runnen van dubbelagenten. Masterman benoemde in zijn rapport over het double-cross systeem de sleutelvoorwaarden waar een spion aan moest voldoen om succesvol als dubbelspion gerund te kunnen worden; Dubbelagenten werden alleen gerekruteerd uit spionnen die werden gezonden vanuit Duitsland. Dit had te maken met de carrièrekansen binnen de Abwehr waar de spionnenmeesters zelf hun spionnen rekruteerden en hun eigen carrière dus afhankelijk was van het succes van hun ‘eigen’ agent. Alle dubbelagenten zouden zo goed als het kon het leven moeten leiden dat ze als spion zouden moeten leiden. Zo was het wenselijk dat ze wel de reizen door het land maakten en de vliegvelden zelf bezochten waarover ze moesten rapporteren. Dit om de betrouwbaarheid van de berichten te versterken. Al het radioverkeer stond onder toezicht van controllers en mocht alleen na schriftelijke bevestiging van het comité worden verzonden naar de Abwehr. Een case officier werd toegewezen aan elke specifieke dubbelagent. Deze moest de dubbelagent dagelijks in de gaten houden en vormde 2 Christopher Andrew, The Defence of the Realm, The Authorized History of MI5 (Londen 2010) 217- 241. 5 vaak een vertrouwenspersoon van de dubbelagent. Een grondige psychologisch analyse van elke agent was belangrijk. Dit om een vinger aan de pols te houden met betrekking tot de loyaliteit van de dubbelagent. Een snel contact moest gemaakt worden met de Duitsers zodra er zekerheid bestond over de achtergrond van de spion, mogelijke waarschuwingscodes in zijn berichten en de stijl in het zenden van de morse code. Alle zaken omtrent de dubbelagent moest worden gedocumenteerd om later te kunnen analyseren. Het was belangrijk te voorkomen dat men in een later stadium een tegenstrijdig bericht zou zenden. De agent zou zo min mogelijk contact met andere dubbelagenten moeten hebben, om hem zo onafhankelijk mogelijk te houden en het risico op lekken te verkleinen. Een financiële vergoeding voor de dubbelagent was belangrijk. Dit was vaak een percentage van de beloning die dat vanuit Duitsland naar de dubbelagent werd gestuurd om zijn taken uit te voeren. Wanneer het aantal dubbelagenten groeide was kwaliteit altijd belangrijker dan kwantiteit. De belangrijkste dubbelagenten waren vaak personen die laag op de sociale ladder stonden. Zij leverden kleine stukjes informatie welke indirect gebruikt konden worden om een groter beeld te scheppen van de situatie in Groot-Brittannië. Het was belangrijk om bij desinformatie zo dicht mogelijk bij de waarheid te blijven. De desinformatie moest zo betrouwbaar mogelijk zijn om zo het vertrouwen van de Duitsers in ‘hun’ spion geleidelijk op te bouwen en pas op het essentiële moment de grote misleiding los te laten welke de Duitsers dan voor waarheid zouden aannemen.3 In het hieronder volgende verslag zal ik aan de hand van de huidige stand van zaken met betrekking tot het theoretische gedeelte van het overkoepelende veld (de contra- inlichtingen) een kader scheppen om het double-cross systeem nader te bestuderen. Het rapport van Masterman lijkt een vooropgesteld en logisch volgende handleiding voor het controleren van dubbelagenten te suggereren. Liep de ontwikkeling van het double-cross systeem wel volgens zo’n voorbedachte lijn? In een viertal casestudies van dubbelspionnen zal de nadruk worden gelegd op het operationele niveau van het double-cross
Recommended publications
  • HISTORY of WWII INFILTRATIONS INTO FRANCE-Rev62-06102013
    Tentative of History of In/Exfiltrations into/from France during WWII from 1940 to 1945 (Parachutes, Plane & Sea Landings) Forewords This tentative of history of civilians and military agents (BCRA, Commandos, JEDBURGHS, OSS, SAS, SIS, SOE, SUSSEX/OSSEX, SUSSEX/BRISSEX & PROUST) infiltrated or exfiltrated during the WWII into France, by parachute, by plane landings and/or by sea landings. This document, which needs to be completed and corrected, has been prepared using the information available, not always reliable, on the following internet websites and books available: 1. The Order of the Liberation website : http://www.ordredelaliberation.fr/english/contenido1.php The Order of the Liberation is France's second national Order after the Legion of Honor, and was instituted by General De Gaulle, Leader of the "Français Libres" - the Free French movement - with Edict No. 7, signed in Brazzaville on November 16th, 1940. 2. History of Carpetbaggers (USAAF) partly available on Thomas Ensminger’s website addresses: ftp://www.801492.org/ (Need a user logging and password). It is not anymore possible to have access to this site since Thomas’ death on 03/05/2012. http://www.801492.org/MainMenu.htm http://www.801492.org/Air%20Crew/Crewz.htm I was informed that Thomas Ensminger passed away on the 03/05/2012. I like to underline the huge work performed as historian by Thomas to keep alive the memory the Carpetbaggers’ history and their famous B24 painted in black. RIP Thomas. The USAAF Carpetbagger's mission was that of delivering supplies and agents to resistance groups in the enemy occupied Western European nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 267 German Spy Set SE 88/5 in A
    Wireless for the Warrior - Volume 4 Supplement Chap. 267 - 1 The German spy set SE88/5 in a box. A research-story after eight decades. By Thomas Höppe, DJ5RE. Editorial revision by Giselle Jakobs. Spy radios from the „Abwehr“, the German S 88/5: A small transmitter, crystal control- To save space, the coils in the input filter of military secret service in WW2, are num- led with KL2 tube. No receiver, the agents the RF amp and in the detector stage were bered by the following system: a transmitter were sending their messages „blind“ with no wound on Siemens powdered iron cores is marked with an „S“ (Sender), while a ability to receive a response. with cross-shaped shields and an adjustable receiver is marked with an „E“ (Empfänger). core. The abbreviation „SE“ indicates the pres- ence of both a transmitter and a receiver. The SE 88/5: A transmitter and receiver housed first number is a sequential or serial number in separate boxes. The transmitter is the S which simply indicates the period during 88/5 described above, combined with the which the set was developed in the Abwehr receiver „E 88“. This receiver was built workshops. The older the set, the smaller the using the box and mechanical layout of the number. The early sets (1939 and earlier) German standard receiver „E 75“. This re- begin in the 70’s series and the later wartime ceiver was named E 85 in the set SE 85/14 sets used the 100’s series. The last number, and E 90 in set SE 90/40.
    [Show full text]
  • Università Di Pisa
    Università di Pisa Dipartimento di Civiltà e Forme del Sapere Corso di laurea magistrale in Storia e Civiltà Tesi di laurea Dalla poesia di Verlaine alla rete di Garbo: l’importanza delle operazioni di deception per la riuscita dello sbarco in Normandia Relatore: Prof. Luca Baldissara Correlatore: Candidato: Dott. Gianluca Fulvetti Alessandro Berti Anno Accademico 2016-2017 1 2 Dedicata a tutti quei ragazzi che il 6 giugno del 1944 persero la vita, per rendere, ancora una volta, il Mondo libero. «Think not only upon their passing. Remember the glory of their spirit.» 3 4 Indice Introduzione………………………………………………………… p. 7 Capitolo Primo: La Seconda guerra mondiale 1.1 Preludio………………………………………………………… p. 13 1.2 1939…………………………………………………………… p. 19 1.3 1940…………………………………………………………… p. 21 1.4 1941…………………………………………………………… p. 28 1.5 1942…………………………………………………………… p. 35 1.6 1943…………………………………………………………… p. 43 Capitolo Secondo: Il ruolo della Resistenza 2.1 La guerra contemporanea……………………………………… p. 47 2.2 Un nuovo tipo di guerra: la Resistenza………………………… p. 51 2.3 La Resistenza europea………………………………………… p. 53 2.4 La Francia di Vichy…………………………………………… p. 64 2.5 La Francia Libera e la Resistenza……………………………… p. 74 Capitolo Terzo: Il ruolo dei servizi segreti 3.1 I servizi segreti Alleati…………………………………………. p. 89 3.2 Il SOE………………………………………………………… p. 94 3.3 Bletchley Park……………………………………………… p. 104 3.4 Double Cross System………………………………………… p. 110 5 Capitolo Quarto: Il preludio al D-Day 4.1 Le grandi conferenze e il Secondo Fronte…………………… p. 121 4.2 Stabilire le modalità d’invasione……………………………… p. 128 4.3 Gli uomini…………………………………………………… p. 142 4.4 I mezzi………………………………………………………. p. 147 4.5 I porti artificiali……………………………………………… p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Double Cross System and MI-5'S Supremacy in World War II
    “A Game of Human Chess”: The Double Cross System and MI-5’s Supremacy in World War II By Adamya Sharma History Departmental Undergraduate Honors Thesis University of Colorado at Boulder April 7, 2015 Thesis Advisor: Dr. Thomas Zeiler Department of History and International Affairs Defense Committee: Dr. Fred Anderson Department of History Dr. Thomas Metcalf Department of Philosophy Abstract World War II featured monumental battles, such as the Normandy invasions, the Battle of the Bulge, Stalingrad, Iwo Jima, El Alamein, and Kursk. While historical scholarship of the World War II generally focuses on the war’s grand military engagements, it is imperative to note that Allied and Axis intelligence units battled for supremacy in a war of deception. The Double Cross system employed by the British military intelligence division (MI-5) was, virtually from the war’s onset, successful in overwhelming its German opponent, the Abwehr by turning its agents into supportive double agents. Traditional historiography follows the classic spy narrative and credits the success of MI-5 to its daring agents, brilliant creators, or stalwart handlers who used wit and guile to deceive their German adversary. In this thesis I will argue that the success of the Double Cross system should be attributed to more than solely the actions of the Double Cross team. Though the operatives played an invaluable role, the existence of an overriding, well-structured system determined their success. By examining the uniqueness of the Double Cross system, this thesis will seek to illustrate that the victorious outcome of the British in the intelligence war was due to their tireless effort to perfect a system of counterespionage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Double Cross System and MI-5'S Supremacy in World War II
    University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program Spring 2015 “A Game of Human Chess”: The oubleD Cross System and MI-5’s Supremacy in World War II Adamya Sharma [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses Part of the European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Sharma, Adamya, "“A Game of Human Chess”: The oubD le Cross System and MI-5’s Supremacy in World War II" (2015). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 913. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Honors Program at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “A Game of Human Chess”: The Double Cross System and MI-5’s Supremacy in World War II By Adamya Sharma History Departmental Undergraduate Honors Thesis University of Colorado at Boulder April 7, 2015 Thesis Advisor: Dr. Thomas Zeiler Department of History and International Affairs Defense Committee: Dr. Fred Anderson Department of History Dr. Thomas Metcalf Department of Philosophy Abstract World War II featured monumental battles, such as the Normandy invasions, the Battle of the Bulge, Stalingrad, Iwo Jima, El Alamein, and Kursk. While historical scholarship of the World War II generally focuses on the war’s grand military engagements, it is imperative to note that Allied and Axis intelligence units battled for supremacy in a war of deception. The Double Cross system employed by the British military intelligence division (MI-5) was, virtually from the war’s onset, successful in overwhelming its German opponent, the Abwehr by turning its agents into supportive double agents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drugs Don't Work : Intelligence, Torture and the London Cage, 1940–8
    The drugs don’t work : intelligence, torture and the London Cage, 1940–8 Lomas, DWB http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2018.1478629 Title The drugs don’t work : intelligence, torture and the London Cage, 1940–8 Authors Lomas, DWB Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/47215/ Published Date 2018 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Review Article The Drugs Don’t Work: Intelligence, Torture and the London Cage Dan Lomas Helen Fry, The London Cage: The Secret History of Britain’s World War II Interrogation Centre, New Haven and London: Yale University Press (2017), pp. 256, Hbk, £18.99, ISBN: ISBN: 9780300221930. Prisoner of war interrogation has always been an important source of intelligence.1 In Britain, it is a topic that has often met with controversy. Wartime interrogations at MI5’s Camp 020, colonial abuses during the Mau Mau uprising and Aden campaigns, the so-called ‘Five Techniques’ in Northern Ireland and military interrogations in Iraq and Afghanistan, have all provoked claims of ill-treatment. The growing controversy around the ethics of interrogation and allegations of torture have led to a welcome growth in the literature, moving the subject beyond the niche it once was, even if some is often prone to hyperbole.2 Helen Fry’s new account of the secretive London District Cage interrogation facility, housed in buildings off Kensington Palace Gardens, located in central London, is the latest book to shed light on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Dramatising Intelligence History on the BBC : the Camp 020 Affair Murphy, CJ
    Dramatising intelligence history on the BBC : the Camp 020 affair Murphy, CJ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1595466 Title Dramatising intelligence history on the BBC : the Camp 020 affair Authors Murphy, CJ Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/50417/ Published Date 2019 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Dramatising Intelligence History on the BBC: The Camp 020 Affair While there is a considerable literature that considers post-1945 British intelligence historiography, little attention has been given to non-print media, such as factual depictions of intelligence affairs broadcast on television or radio. Using previously closed material from the British Broadcasting Corporation’s written archives, this article explores how factual intelligence and security issues were represented by the BBC as the 1970s drew to a close, through an examination of the Spy! television series, which approached episodes of recent intelligence history in a drama-documentary format. The second episode of the series, seen by millions of viewers, proved controversial owing to its depiction of a physical assault during interrogation at an MI5 facility, Camp 020, during the Second World War. The article explores the fallout from this episode, as numerous Camp 020 veterans made great efforts to point out that such physical violence had never taken place.
    [Show full text]
  • Dueling Intelligence Organizations in World War II Whitney Talley Bendeck
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 The Art of Deception: Dueling Intelligence Organizations in World War II Whitney Talley Bendeck Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE ART OF DECEPTION: DUELING INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATIONS IN WORLD WAR II By Whitney Talley Bendeck A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Whitney Talley Bendeck All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Whitney Talley Bendeck defended on 27 July 2004. Michael Creswell Professor Directing Thesis Jonathan Grant Committee Member Edward D. Wynot Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Michael Creswell who spent his summer reading and re- reading this work. His wonderful editing, although rather overwhelming at the time, proved to be invaluable. I would also like to thank Dr. Jonathan Grant who was so kind to join my committee with relatively short notice (as a result of Dr. Winston Lo’s retirement). Last, but certainly not least, I wish to thank Dr. Ed Wynot for his direction, insight, and kindness. I reserve a special thanks for my family who has offered me so much support and encouragement. I am especially grateful to my husband, Oscar, who selflessly took on almost all domestic and child-rearing responsibilities during the final phases of this project.
    [Show full text]