DOCSLIB.ORG

Mid Term Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mid Term Review MID TERM REVIEW Kenema District Economic Recovery Programme SIERRA LEONE July 2010 Special Projects Implementation Review Exercise of UNCDF projects in the Local Development and Inclusive Finance Practice Italy MTR/SPIRE Kenema District Canada -Mexico - USA Economic Recovery Programme, Sierra Leone A consortium of DRN and ES Global c/o DRN, leading company: Headquarters Via Ippolito Nievo 62 00153 Rome, Italy Tel +39-06-581-6074 Fax +39-06-581-6390 nd [email protected] 2 DRAFT REPORT Belgium office Square Plasky 92-94 1030 Brussels, Belgium July 2010 Tel: +32-2-732-4607 Tel/Fax +32-2-736-1663 [email protected] EVALUATION TEAM Team Leader Philip Bottern ([email protected]) Andrea Agostinucci International expert ([email protected]) Timbo Mohamed Bailor Allieu National expert ([email protected]) Mid Term Review: Kenema District Economic Recovery Programme, Sierra Leone This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Capital Develop- ment Fund, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. This is an inde- pendent publication by UNCDF and reflects the views of its authors. DRN and ES GLOBAL Mid Term Review: Kenema District Economic Recovery Programme, Sierra Leone UNCDF Special Projects Implementation Review Exercise - SPIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS BASIC GEOGRAPHIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ........................................................................ III PROGRAMME DATA SHEET ............................................................................................................... IV ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... VII 1. THE EVALUATION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Framework of the Evaluation ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Scope and Objectives of the Evaluation ........................................................................................... 1 1.3. Methods and Limitations in Data Collection .................................................................................. 2 2. COUNTRY CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Socio-Economic Context ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Policy & Institutional Environment ................................................................................................... 4 3. PROGRAMME PROFILE ................................................................................................................ 7 3.1. Programme Description .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.2. Programme Status ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Implementation ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 Financial data ....................................................................................................................................... 16 4. EVALUATION FINDINGS ............................................................................................................ 18 4.1. The Programme Is Highly Relevant for the Development Objectives of Sierra Leone and Well Aligned with UNCDF’s Local Development Programmes .................................. 18 4.2. The Programme has - along with other initiatives - Contributed to Increased Capacity of the Councils ....................................................................................................................... 21 4.3. The programme has contributed to Improved Planning, Funding and Management of Infrastructure and Service Delivery by Local Councils, although the Three Functions are not sufficiently integrated yet. ............................................................................ 25 4.4. The Programme has Started Contributing to Improved Availability of/and Access to Infrastructure and Services, Nevertheless a Consistent and Innovative LED Focus is Yet to be Introduced .............................................................................................................................. 29 4.5. The Programme is Bringing Initial but Substantial Contribution to Improved Local Democratic Governance Systems and Processes based on Community Participation and Empowerment ................................................................................................................................. 34 4.6. Good Ownership of the Planning and Investments’ Selection Processes is a Promising Result, but Unclear Procedures for Maintenance and Low Financial Capacity of LCs Constitute a Serious Risk for the Sustainability of Investments ....... 36 4.7. Management of the Programme has been Fairly Effective, But Strategic Guidance has been Affected by Lack of a Functioning Steering Committee and M&E System . 39 4.8. The Partnerships with the GoSL and other Donors Support Programme Implementation Quite Well, But Potential Synergies for Upscaling are not Fully Developed ................................................................................................................................................... 41 4.9. The Programme is Contributing to Government Efforts to Enhance the Decentralisation Policy Framework, But has Not Directly Induced Specific Improvements on the Basis of Practices Tested at Local Level ......................................... 43 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 45 5.1. Overall Performance Assessment .................................................................................................... 45 5.2. The Programme Provides Effective and Relevant Support and Complements current Government and Donor Efforts ........................................................................................................ 46 Final Report July 2010 i DRN and ES GLOBAL Mid Term Review: Kenema District Economic Recovery Programme, Sierra Leone UNCDF Special Projects Implementation Review Exercise - SPIRE 5.3. The Programme is Starting to Achieve Some Positive Results in Building the Capacities of the Two Local Councils ............................................................................................. 46 5.4. The Programme is Funding Relevant Investments and Contributing to an Enabling Environment for Private Sector Development, but Is Yet to Develop a Strategic Focus and Significant Innovative Approaches to LED ............................................................ 47 5.5. The Revenue Generating Initiatives of the Programme Present Some Deficiencies 48 5.6. Strategic Management Decisions are Hampered by the Lack of a Fully Functional M&E System and a Functioning Programme Steering Committee ................................... 48 5.7. The Programme is Contributing to the Definition of the Decentralisation Policy Framework but Provides still Limited Inputs for Mainstreaming Innovation and Fostering Partnership and Donors’ Up-Take of Piloted Practices .................................... 49 5.8. The Model Has Yet To Show Its Comparative Advantage as a Basis for Replication 50 ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................................ 52 ANNEX 2: BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 62 ANNEX 3: LIST OF PEOPLE MET ............................................................................................................. 64 ANNEX 4: FINAL KDERP MTR MISSION PLAN .................................................................................... 66 ANNEX 5: TOTAL PROGRAMME EXPENDITURE ....................................................................................... 69 ANNEX 6: MANAGEMENT RESPONSE MATRIX ........................................................................................ 70 ANNEX 6: EVALUATION QUESTIONS MATRIX ADJUSTED TO KDERP MTR ........................................... 74 ANNEX 8: OPINION SURVEYS FOR NATIONAL AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS ............................................ 92 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF CORE EVALUATION QUESTIONS ....................................................................... 2 TABLE 2: SUMMARY WORK-PLAN ....................................................................................................................... 3 TABLE 3: KDERP: GOAL, OBJECTIVE AND OUTPUTS .................................................................................. 7 TABLE 4: KDERP CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING 2007 TO 2009 ........................................ 11 TABLE 5: PARTICIPANTS IN CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING ................................................ 11 TABLE 6: INVESTMENTS FUNDED BY THE PROGRAMME LDF ........................................................... 12 TABLE 7: PROGRESS ASSESSMENT PER RRF OUTPUTS AND TARGETS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sierra Leone
    Sierra Leone Main objectives • In collaboration with the Government of Sierra Leone and other partners, pursue the reinte- gration of Sierra Leonean returnees, leading to • Provide international protection and basic a complete phase-out of interventions by humanitarian assistance to Liberian refugees. UNHCR (i.e. rebuild national protection struc- • Facilitate the repatriation of Liberian refugees tures and hand over assistance activities to who opt to return home in conditions of safety development actors). and dignity; provide information about security and living conditions in Liberia. Planning figures • Facilitate local integration, naturalization or Population Jan 2005 Dec 2005 resettlement for Liberian refugees who arrived in Sierra Leone during the 1990s and are not Liberia (refugees) 50,000 24,000 willing to repatriate. Sierra Leonean 30,000 0 • Enhance Government capacity to handle refugee returnees issues following the adoption and implementa- Total 80,000 24,000 tion of national refugee legislation, including assisting new government structures to become Total requirements: 25,043,136 operational. UNHCR Global Appeal 2005 174 the 4Rs strategy, has yielded positive results, with Working environment the presence of the UNDP/TST (Transitional Sup- port Team) being accommodated in UNHCR field Major developments offices to ensure continuity of interventions. With the focus of reintegration efforts on consolidating In 2004, political stability and the progressive res- and linking of work already undertaken to the toration of state authority permitted a further longer-term programmes of development actors, 30,000 Sierra Leoneans to return. By 31 July 2004 UNHCR will only fund new projects in 2005 if they – the end of the organized operation launched in are sure to reach completion by the year’s end.
    [Show full text]
  • G U I N E a Liberia Sierra Leone
    The boundaries and names shown and the designations Mamou used on this map do not imply official endorsement or er acceptance by the United Nations. Nig K o L le n o G UINEA t l e a SIERRA Kindia LEONEFaranah Médina Dula Falaba Tabili ba o s a g Dubréka K n ie c o r M Musaia Gberia a c S Fotombu Coyah Bafodia t a e r G Kabala Banian Konta Fandié Kamakwie Koinadugu Bendugu Forécariah li Kukuna Kamalu Fadugu Se Bagbe r Madina e Bambaya g Jct. i ies NORTHERN N arc Sc Kurubonla e Karina tl it Mateboi Alikalia L Yombiro Kambia M Pendembu Bumbuna Batkanu a Bendugu b Rokupr o l e Binkolo M Mange Gbinti e Kortimaw Is. Kayima l Mambolo Makeni i Bendou Bodou Port Loko Magburaka Tefeya Yomadu Lunsar Koidu-Sefadu li Masingbi Koundou e a Lungi Pepel S n Int'l Airport or a Matotoka Yengema R el p ok m Freetown a Njaiama Ferry Masiaka Mile 91 P Njaiama- Wellington a Yele Sewafe Tongo Gandorhun o Hastings Yonibana Tungie M Koindu WESTERN Songo Bradford EAS T E R N AREA Waterloo Mongeri York Rotifunk Falla Bomi Kailahun Buedu a i Panguma Moyamba a Taiama Manowa Giehun Bauya T Boajibu Njala Dambara Pendembu Yawri Bendu Banana Is. Bay Mano Lago Bo Segbwema Daru Shenge Sembehun SOUTHE R N Gerihun Plantain Is. Sieromco Mokanje Kenema Tikonko Bumpe a Blama Gbangbatok Sew Tokpombu ro Kpetewoma o Sh Koribundu M erb Nitti ro River a o i Turtle Is. o M h Sumbuya a Sherbro I.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Ebola Community Health Worker Programme Performance In
    F1000Research 2019, 8:794 Last updated: 28 SEP 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE Post-Ebola Community Health Worker programme performance in Kenema District, Sierra Leone: A long way to go! [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Harold Thomas1, Katrina Hann 2, Mohamed Vandi1, Joseph Bengalie Sesay3, Koi Sylvester Alpha4, Robinah Najjemba 5 1Directorate of Health Security and Emergencies, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone 2Sustainable Health Systems, Freetown, Sierra Leone 3Koinadugu District Health Management Team, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Kabala, Sierra Leone 4Kenema District Health Management Team, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Kenema, Sierra Leone 5Makerere University School of Public Health, Makerere, Uganda v1 First published: 06 Jun 2019, 8:794 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18677.1 Latest published: 09 Apr 2020, 8:794 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18677.2 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Background: The devastating 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in Sierra 1 2 Leone could erode the gains of the health system including the Community Health Worker (CHW) programme. We conducted a study version 2 to ascertain if the positive trend in reporting cases of malaria, (revision) report pneumonia and diarrhoea treated by CHWs in the post-Ebola period 09 Apr 2020 has been sustained 18 months post-Ebola. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using version 1 aggregated CHW programme data (2013-2017) from all Primary 06 Jun 2019 report report Health Units in Kenema district. Data was extracted from the District Health Information System and analysed using STATA. Data in the pre- (June 2013-April 2014), during- (June 2014-April 2015) and post-Ebola 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 School List.Xlsx
    emis_num Level Region Council Chfdom School Name Town phone owner 110101101 PRESCHOOL EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE BAIWALLA 076593767 COMMUNITY 110101201 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 METHODIST PRIMARY BAIWALA BAIWALA 78963548 MISSION 110101202 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 NATIONAL ISLAMIC PRIMARY SCHOOL BAOMA 078624877 MISSION 110101203 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 PROVINCIAL ISLAMIC DODO PRIMARY SCHOOL DODO TOWN 078451705 MISSION 110101205 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIMARY NAGBENA 078360004 MISSION 110101206 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL SIENGA SIENGA 076484775 MISSION KAILAHUN DISTRICT EDUCATION COUNCIL PRIMARY 110101207 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 TAKPOIMA 79175290 GOVERNMENT SCHOOL 110101208 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL BAIWALLA 76606361 MISSION 110101209 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 KAILAHUN DISTRICT EDUCATION COMMITTEE KURANKO KURANKO 76735861 GOVERNMENT 110101210 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL SAKIEMA 078456779 MISSION 110101211 PRIMARY EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL 076820424 MISSION 110101301 JSS EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1 PEACE MEMORIAL JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL BAIWALLA 78540707 GOVERNMENT 110201101 PRESCHOOL EAST KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 SUPREME ISLAMIC PRE‐SCHOOL DARU 77702647 MISSION EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT PRE‐ 110201102
    [Show full text]
  • Kailahun District Constituencies And
    NEC: Report on Electoral Constituency Boundaries Delimitation Process Process Delimitation Boundaries Constituency Electoral on Report NEC: 4.1.1 KAILAHUN DISTRICT CONSTITUENCIES AND POPULATION Eastern Region Constituency Maps 1103 a 43,427 m i a g g n K n e i o s T s T i i i s Penguia s K is is Yawei K K Luawa 1101 e 49,499 r 1104 1108 g n 33,457 54,363 o B Kpeje je e Upper West p K Bambara 1102 44,439 1107 Chiefdom Boundary 37,484 Constituency Code Njaluahun Mandu – 1101 Constituency 1 August 2006 August Dea 1102 Constituency 2 Jawie 1103 Constituency 3 1106 Malema 1104 Constituency 4 42,639 1105 Constituency 5 1105 1106 Constituency 6 52,882 1107 Constituency 7 1108 Constituency 8 42,639 Constituency Population PREPARED BY STATISTICS SIERRA LEONE KENEMA DISTRICT CONSTITUENCIES AND POPULATION Gorama Mende 1207 49,953 Wandor 1206 48,429 n u h Simbaru o g Lower le 1208 Dodo Bambara a M 54,312 1205 42,184 Kandu Leppiama 1204 51,486 1202 1201 42,262 Nongowa 43,308 # Small Bo # Kenema # 1203 1209 Town 42,832 44,045 Dama 1210 Niawa 36341 Gaura Langrama Koya 1211 Nomo 42,796 Chiefdom Boundary Constituency Code Tunkia 1201 Constituency 1 1202 Constituency 2 1203 Constituency 3 1204 Constituency 4 1205 Constituency 5 1206 Constituency 6 1207 Constituency 7 1208 Constituency 8 1209 Constituency 9 1210 Constituency 10 1211 Constituency 11 42,796 Constituency Population PREPARED BY STATISTICS SIERRA LEONE NEC: Report on Electoral Constituency Boundaries Delimitation Process – August 2006 NEC: Report on Electoral Constituency Boundaries Delimitation
    [Show full text]
  • U N I T E D N a T I O
    U N I T E D N A T I O N S Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs SIERRA LEONE HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT SEPTEMBER 2003 KEY EVENTS district. A concern raised in Kono is that none of the Watsan implementing partners had the facilities or machines for testing water • Yellow Fever outbreak samples. This has been reported to the MOHS. • Security Council extends UNAMSIL’s mandate • UN Agencies and GoSL celebrate World Peace Day SECURITY HIGHLIGHTS • Nigerian lawmakers call on UNAMSIL Overall security UNAMSIL (United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone) reports the overall security situation in HUMANITARIAN HIGHLIGHTS the country to be calm. However there have been some concerns about security along the Yellow Fever outbreak border regions, particularly along the Mano The Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MOHS) River Union Bridge in the south. Similarly the has reported a total of 90 cases of Yellow Sierra Leone Police (SLP) are concerned Fever, from eight districts in the country: about the porous nature of the border in the Tonkolili, Bombali, Kenema, Koinadugu, Port Kamakwie, Tambakha and Koinadugu areas, Loko, Kambia and Kono. Of the 90 reported in the Northern Province that have resulted in cases (as of 29 September) four laboratory increased smuggling of goods across the cases were confirmed, all from the Tonkolili borders. The police have also reported hunters District, where majority of the suspected cases from Guinea, coming across, poaching and emanate from. Earlier, the MOHS gave out crossing back into Guinea. 100,000 doses of vaccine in four chiefdoms in the district. They have now finally secured UNAMSIL’s mandate extended funds to carry out mass immunization The UN Security Council has extended campaign in the remaining seven chiefdoms of UNAMSIL’s mandate, which was to expire on the district.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart of the Matter
    THE HEART OF THE MATTER SIERRA LEONE, DIAMONDS & HUMAN SECURITY (COMPLETE REPORT) Ian Smillie Lansana Gberie Ralph Hazleton Partnership Africa Canada (PAC) is a coalition of Canadian and African organizations that work in partnership to promote sustainable human development policies that benefit African and Canadian societies. The Insights series seeks to deepen understanding of current issues affecting African development. The series is edited by Bernard Taylor. The Heart of the Matter: Sierra Leone, Diamonds and Human Security (Complete Report) Ian Smillie, Lansana Gberie, Ralph Hazleton ISBN 0-9686270-4-8 © Partnership Africa Canada, January 2000 Partnership Africa Canada 323 Chapel St., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 7Z2 [email protected] P.O. Box 60233, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia pac@ telecom.net.et ________________ The Authors Ian Smillie, an Ottawa-based consultant, has 30 years of international development experience, as manager, programmer, evaluator and writer. He was a founder of the Canadian NGO Inter Pares, and was Executive Director of CUSO from 1979 to 1983. His most recent publications include The Alms Bazaar: Altruism Under Fire; Non Profit Organizations and International Development (IT Publications, London, 1995) and Stakeholders: Government-NGO Partnerships for International Development (ed. With Henny Helmich, Earthscan, London, 1999). Since 1997 he has worked as an associate with the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute at Brown University on issues relating to humanitarianism and war. Ian Smillie started his international work in 1967 as a teacher in Koidu, the centre of Sierra Leone’s diamond mining area. Lansana Gberie is a doctoral student at the University of Toronto and research associate at the Laurier Centre for Military, Strategic and Disarmament Studies, Waterloo, Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone
    Sierra Leone A TAG LANCE Main Objectives and Activities Assess the protection requirements of those Liberian refugees who did not wish to repatriate; facilitate the local integration of Liberian refugees in need of international protection and identify resettle- ment opportunities; assess how national and local socio-economic, political and security factors will affect the needs of Sierra Leonean returnees; compile Returnee District Area Profiles taking into account the security needs of potential returnees to those dis- Persons of Concern tricts; facilitate and later promote Main Refugee Total Of whom Per cent Per cent Origin/Type of in UNHCR Female under 18 the voluntary repatriation of Sierra Population Country assisted Leonean refugees and help them Sierra Leone (IDPs) 300,000 - - - settle back into their communities Sierra Leone 200,000 - - - of origin; in the context of the (Returned IDPs) Brookings process, establish opera- Sierra Leone 40,900 24,900 - - tional linkages and mechanisms (Returnees) which best ensure a smooth transi- Liberia (Refugees) 6,500 6,500 - - tion from emergency relief to longer-term reconstruction and recovery. Income and Expenditure (USD) Annual Programme, Trust Funds and Supplementary Programme Budgets Impact Revised Income Other Total Total • In 2000, UNHCR undertook Budget from Funds Funds Expenditure Contributions1 Available2 Available screening of 1,872 Liberian AB/TF 941,439 879,376 431,354 1,310,730 832,471 households including new appli- SB 9,380,111 3,966,962 2,697,173 6,664,135 6,664,135 cations, in order to determine the Total 10,321,550 4,846,338 3,128,527 7,974,865 7,496,606 need of those who did not partic- 1Includes income from contributions earmarked at the country level.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Recovery Requirements (Us$)
    National Recovery Strategy Sierra Leone 2002 - 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 4. RESTORATION OF THE ECONOMY 48 INFORMATION SHEET 7 MAPS 8 Agriculture and Food-Security 49 Mining 53 INTRODUCTION 9 Infrastructure 54 Monitoring and Coordination 10 Micro-Finance 57 I. RECOVERY POLICY III. DISTRICT INFORMATION 1. COMPONENTS OF RECOVERY 12 EASTERN REGION 60 Government 12 1. Kailahun 60 Civil Society 12 2. Kenema 63 Economy & Infrastructure 13 3. Kono 66 2. CROSS CUTTING ISSUES 14 NORTHERN REGION 69 HIV/AIDS and Preventive Health 14 4. Bombali 69 Youth 14 5. Kambia 72 Gender 15 6. Koinadugu 75 Environment 16 7. Port Loko 78 8. Tonkolili 81 II. PRIORITY AREAS OF SOUTHERN REGION 84 INTERVENTION 9. Bo 84 10. Bonthe 87 11. Moyamba 90 1. CONSOLIDATION OF STATE AUTHORITY 18 12. Pujehun 93 District Administration 18 District/Local Councils 19 WESTERN AREA 96 Sierra Leone Police 20 Courts 21 Prisons 22 IV. FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS Native Administration 23 2. REBUILDING COMMUNITIES 25 SUMMARY OF RECOVERY REQUIREMENTS Resettlement of IDPs & Refugees 26 CONSOLIDATION OF STATE AUTHORITY Reintegration of Ex-Combatants 38 REBUILDING COMMUNITIES Health 31 Water and Sanitation 34 PEACE-BUILDING AND HUMAN RIGHTS Education 36 RESTORATION OF THE ECONOMY Child Protection & Social Services 40 Shelter 43 V. ANNEXES 3. PEACE-BUILDING AND HUMAN RIGHTS 46 GLOSSARY NATIONAL RECOVERY STRATEGY - 3 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ▪ Deployment of remaining district officials, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY including representatives of line ministries to all With Sierra Leone’s destructive eleven-year conflict districts (by March). formally declared over in January 2002, the country is ▪ Elections of District Councils completed and at last beginning the task of reconstruction, elected District Councils established (by June).
    [Show full text]
  • IRC Sierra Leone Rainbo Centres – an Overview, January 2013
    IRC Sierra Leone Rainbo Centres – An Overview, January 2013 The IRC has been present in West Africa for over ten years and implementing programmes in Sierra Leone since 1999. As Sierra Leone is now in transition from relief and rehabilitation to development, the IRC is currently implementing programmes in the areas of child protection, education, gender- based violence, and health. The IRC country programme is managed from the head office in Freetown and has three field offices in Kenema, Kono and Kailahun. The IRC has been implementing specific programmes to promote and protect the rights of women and girls affected by gender based violence in various countries since 1998 and in Sierra Leone since 2001. During this time, the IRC has established the Rainbo Initiative, comprising three Sexual Assault Referral Centres in Freetown, Kono, and Kenema respectively, which provide holistic and high quality medical, psychosocial and legal referral services to survivors of sexual assault. Currently the Women’s Protection and Empowerment / Gender Based Violence Programme (WPE/GBV) implements programming activities in Freetown and the Eastern Region of Sierra Leone that encompass the following components: Prevention of violence against women and girls through community awareness, male engagement, school gender clubs, and training activities at various levels; Economic empowerment of women and girls through improved access to economic strengthening services; Services to survivors through the Rainbo Centres and community-based systems; and Advocacy and engagement with government at all levels to strengthen implementation of existing laws and policies to promote the rights of women and girls in Sierra Leone. The Rainbo Centres, originally known as the Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARC) were established, respectively, in Freetown in 2003; in Kenema in 2004; and in Koidu in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Pygmy Hippo Conservation Project
    Pygmy Hippo Conservation Project Within the “Across the River – A Transboundary Peace Park for Sierra Leone and Liberia” Project (ARTP) Sponsored by Zoo Basel, Switzerland First report, July – December 2010 Dr. Annika Hillers & Andrew M. Muana Across the River – A Transboundary Peace Park for Sierra Leone and Liberia (ARTP) Research Unit c/o Gola Forest Programme, 164 Dama Road, Kenema, Sierra Leone [email protected] Pygmy Hippo Conservation Project: First report July – December 2010 Zusammenfassung Das Zwergflusspferd-Schutzprojekt im “Across the River – A Transboundary Peace Park for Sierra Leone and Liberia” Projekt (ARTP) möchte in enger Zusammenarbeit mit den im Projektgebiet ansässigen Gemeinden Zwergflusspferde untersuchen und schützen. Das Projekt startete im Juli 2010. Das Team besteht aus einem Projektkoordinator, einem Verantwortlichen für Umwelterziehung und fünf „Community Conservation wardens“. Außerdem wird das Team von Kollegen der Forschungseinheit des ARTPs unterstützt. Die Community Wardens wurden in der Nutzung von GPS-Einheiten, Kompass, Fragebögen und Grundlagenwissen im Bereich Naturschutz und Zwergflusspferden geschult. Seit Juli 2010 sind sie regelmäßig im Feld und in den Dörfern unterwegs, um Daten zum Schutzstatus und zur Gefährdung von Zwergflusspferden (Jagd, Habitatzerstörung) sowie Informationen zu ihrer Ökologie (z.B. Ernährung und Bewegungsmuster) und bisher nicht bekannten Populationen zu sammeln. Geeignete Habitate entlang von Flüssen werden nach Kot-, Fuß- und Fressspuren abgesucht. Im Bereich Umwelterziehung kooperieren wir mit April Conway und der Environmental Foundation for Africa. Diese Kooperation beinhaltet das Erstellen von Materialien (z.B. Poster und Aufkleber) sowie gemeinsame Aktivitäten (z.B. Schulbesuche und „Road shows“ in den Dörfern). Für die zweite Hälfte des Projekts von Januar bis Juni 2011 planen wir, das Umwelterziehungsprogramm neben den bisherigen Aktivitäten auf das Erstellen von Zwergflusspferd-Wandmalereien auszuweiten.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierraleone Local Council Ward Boundary Delimitation Report
    NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION Sierra Leone Local Council Ward Boundary Delimitation Report Volume Two Meets and Bounds April 2008 Table of Contents Preface ii A. Eastern region 1. Kailahun District Council 1 2. Kenema City Council 9 3. Kenema District Council 12 4. Koidu/New Sembehun City Council 22 5. Kono District Council 26 B. Northern Region 1. Makeni City Council 34 2. Bombali District Council 37 3. Kambia District Council 45 4. Koinadugu District Council 51 5. Port Loko District Council 57 6. Tonkolili District Council 66 C. Southern Region 1. Bo City Council 72 2. Bo District Council 75 3. Bonthe Municipal Council 80 4. Bonthe District Council 82 5. Moyamba District Council 86 6. Pujehun District Council 92 D. Western Region 1. Western Area Rural District Council 97 2. Freetown City Council 105 i Preface This part of the report on Electoral Ward Boundaries Delimitation process is a detailed description of each of the 394 Local Council Wards nationwide, comprising of Chiefdoms, Sections, Streets and other prominent features defining ward boundaries. It is the aspect that deals with the legal framework for the approved wards _____________________________ Dr. Christiana A. M Thorpe Chief Electoral Commissioner and Chair ii CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT No………………………..of 2008 Published: THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, 2004 (Act No. 1 of 2004) THE KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL (ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCALITY AND DELIMITATION OF WARDS) Order, 2008 Short title In exercise of the powers conferred upon him by subsection (2) of Section 2 of the Local Government Act, 2004, the President, acting on the recommendation of the Minister of Internal Affairs, Local Government and Rural Development, the Minister of Finance and Economic Development and the National Electoral Commission, hereby makes the following Order:‐ 1.
    [Show full text]