DOCSLIB.ORG

Foundation Document • Valles Caldera National Preserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foundation Document • Valles Caldera National Preserve NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Valles Caldera National Preserve New Mexico March 2018 Foundation Document Chicoma Mountain 11561ft eek 3524m Cr a llin s Ga o 10380ft di In 3164m s lo Cerro Toledo E L A O D G A R 10930ft R R I T A e E d C 3331m o t i R SANTA CLARA INDIAN RESERVATION Sa S n V A ant L L E a ek Cre S A N Clara A An N T O N I O to Cr nio eek V A L L E T O L E D O San An to Caballo Mountain C n 10496ft CERRO E io k Cerro San Luis R C 3199m E e SANTA ROSA R R e 9510ft C R r 2899m O re O C Cerro Seco S e S k 9931ft o D D i 3026m E n 9701ft E o L t San Antonio 2957m n L A Mountain O A 9986ft S B 3044m n R a P S I k O e G e S VALLE r O C O S SECO 10332ft FOREST NATIONAL 3149m k e re VALLES CALDERA C SANTA FE SANTA s i u VALLE L DE LOS POSOS A NATIONAL PRESERVE r L A N u M O O k h C A N Y ree p C SANTA FE SANTA l Su n V A I L L O a L L E J A R A M S lo il am C E R R O D E L M E D I O R Jar NATIONAL FOREST NATIONAL E D R O B 9848ft O 3002m D Cerro N O Piñon D 8745ft E k 2665m R e L re O C S Redondito Ja Pajarito 105 ra A o 10898ft m Mountain LA d il M n 3322m lo O 10441ft S 126 o R I N C O N D E d C 3182m C e r A e NY R LOS SOLDADOS ON e Redondo Peak k 11254ft History 3430m L Grove Cerro Grande To Los Alamos a and Manhattan Project VALLE GRANDE 10199ft National Historical Park J 3109m a r a Redondo Visitor Contact Station Cr eek Valle Grande Entrance Station 501 er iv R 4 Cerro la Jara z me 4 8745ft Je 2665m rk BANCO BONITO Fo BANDELIER South Mountain Rabbit NATIONAL EL CAJETE 9795ft Mountain 2986m 9938ft MONUMENT t 3029m 4 O s Preserve G Ea Ponderosa I E Entrance D Group Campground (reservation required) N A To White Rock, S East er Bandelier National Monument, iv F and Sante Fe E R Jemez Falls or D k Jemez N River O z SANTA FE NATIONAL FOREST Ñ e A m R e i C to J s d le e los Frijo To 25 and Albuquerque North 0 1 2 Kilometers 0 1 2 Miles Los Griegos Restrooms Campground Ranger station Unpaved road Trail 10117ft 3084m Valles Caldera National Preserve Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Establishment of Valles Caldera National Preserve . 3 Brief Description of Valles Caldera National Preserve . 3 . Park Purpose . 5. Park Significance . 6 . Fundamental Resources and Values . 7 Other Important Resources and Values . 9. Interpretive Themes . 10 . Part 2: Dynamic Components 11 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments . 11 Special Mandates . .11 . Assessment of Planning and Data Needs . 12. Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values . 12 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values . 33 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs . 39 . Planning and Data Needs . 42. Part 3: Contributors 57 Valles Caldera National Preserve . 57. NPS Intermountain Region . .57 . Other NPS Staff . 57 Photo Credits . 57 Appendixes 58 Appendix A: Enabling Legislation for Valles Caldera National Preserve . 58 . Appendix B: Inventory of Administrative Commitments . 83 Appendix C: List of Potential Traditionally Associated Tribes . 86 Foundation Document Valles Caldera National Preserve Mission of the National Park Service The National Park Service (NPS) preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The National Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. The NPS core values are a framework in which the National Park Service accomplishes its mission. They express the manner in which, both individually and collectively, the National Park Service pursues its mission. The NPS core values are: · Shared stewardship: We share a commitment to resource stewardship with the global preservation community. · Excellence: We strive continually to learn and improve so that we may achieve the highest ideals of public service. · Integrity: We deal honestly and fairly with the public and one another. · Tradition: We are proud of it; we learn from it; we are not bound by it. · Respect: We embrace each other’s differences so that we may enrich the well-being of everyone. The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department of the Interior. While numerous national park system units were created prior to 1916, it was not until August 25, 1916, that President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Park Service Organic Act formally establishing the National Park Service. The national park system continues to grow and comprises more than 400 park units covering more than 84 million acres in every state, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. These units include, but are not limited to, national parks, monuments, battlefields, military parks, historical parks, historic sites, lakeshores, seashores, recreation areas, scenic rivers and trails, and the White House. The variety and diversity of park units throughout the nation require a strong commitment to resource stewardship and management to ensure both the protection and enjoyment of these resources for future generations. The arrowhead was authorized as the official National Park Service emblem by the Secretary of the Interior on July 20, 1951. The sequoia tree and bison represent vegetation and wildlife, the mountains and water represent scenic and recreational values, and the arrowhead represents historical and archeological values. 1 Foundation Document Introduction Every unit of the national park system will have a foundational document to provide basic guidance for planning and management decisions—a foundation for planning and management. The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park as well as the park’s purpose, significance, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. The foundation document also includes special mandates and administrative commitments, an assessment of planning and data needs that identifies planning issues, planning products to be developed, and the associated studies and data required for park planning. Along with the core components, the assessment provides a focus for park planning activities and establishes a baseline from which planning documents are developed. A primary benefit of developing a foundation document is the opportunity to integrate and coordinate all kinds and levels of planning from a single, shared understanding of what is most important about the park. The process of developing a foundation document begins with gathering and integrating information about the park. Next, this information is refined and focused to determine what the most important attributes of the park are. The process of preparing a foundation document aids park managers, staff, and the public in identifying and clearly stating in one document the essential information that is necessary for park management to consider when determining future planning efforts, outlining key planning issues, and protecting resources and values that are integral to park purpose and identity. While not included in this document, a park atlas is also part of a foundation project. The atlas is a series of maps compiled from available geographic information system (GIS) data on natural and cultural resources, visitor use patterns, facilities, and other topics. It serves as a GIS-based support tool for planning and park operations. The atlas is published as a (hard copy) paper product and as geospatial data for use in a web mapping environment. The park atlas for Valles Caldera National Preserve can be accessed online at: http://insideparkatlas.nps.gov/. 2 Valles Caldera National Preserve Part 1: Core Components The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park, park purpose, significance statements, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. These components are core because they typically do not change over time. Core components are expected to be used in future planning and management efforts. Establishment of Valles Caldera National Preserve Valles Caldera was first established in 2000 as an unprecedented national experiment in public land management through the creation of the Valles Caldera Trust. The Valles Caldera Trust was a wholly-owned government corporation overseen by a board of trustees appointed by the president of the United States. Through the Valles Caldera Trust, the U.S. Congress sought to evaluate the efficiency, economy, and effectiveness of decentralized public land management and ecosystem restoration. This 15-year experiment in public land management continues to contribute to the national dialogue on the role of protected areas for long-term economic and environmental sustainability along with innovative approaches to place-based and science- based adaptive management. On December 19, 2014, Valles Caldera National Preserve was designated as a unit of the national park system. After a brief transition period, the National Park Service assumed management of the preserve on October 1, 2015. Brief Description of Valles Caldera National Preserve Valles Caldera is located in the center and at the top of the Jemez Mountains in north-central New Mexico.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Mexico New Mexico
    NEW MEXICO NEWand MEXICO the PIMERIA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves NEW MEXICO AND THE PIMERÍA ALTA NEWand MEXICO thePI MERÍA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves UNIVERSITY PRESS OF COLORADO Boulder © 2017 by University Press of Colorado Published by University Press of Colorado 5589 Arapahoe Avenue, Suite 206C Boulder, Colorado 80303 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The University Press of Colorado is a proud member of Association of American University Presses. The University Press of Colorado is a cooperative publishing enterprise supported, in part, by Adams State University, Colorado State University, Fort Lewis College, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Regis University, University of Colorado, University of Northern Colorado, Utah State University, and Western State Colorado University. ∞ This paper meets the requirements of the ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). ISBN: 978-1-60732-573-4 (cloth) ISBN: 978-1-60732-574-1 (ebook) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Douglass, John G., 1968– editor. | Graves, William M., editor. Title: New Mexico and the Pimería Alta : the colonial period in the American Southwest / edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves. Description: Boulder : University Press of Colorado, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016044391| ISBN 9781607325734 (cloth) | ISBN 9781607325741 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Spaniards—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History. | Spaniards—Southwest, New—History. | Indians of North America—First contact with Europeans—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Geochemistry of the Albuquerque-Belen Basin, Central New Mexico
    GROUND-WA TER GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE ALBVQVERQVE-BELEN BASIN, CENTRAL NEW MEXICO By Scott K. Anderholm U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4094 Albuquerque, New Mexico 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Books and Open-File Reports Pinetree Office Park Federal Center, Building 810 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Box 25425 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................. 1 Introduction ......................................................... 2 Acknowledgments ................................................. 4 Purpose and scope ............................................... 4 Location ........................................................ 4 Climate ......................................................... 6 Previous investigations ......................................... 6 Geology .................................................... 6 Hydrology .................................................. 6 Well-numbering system ........................................... 9 Geology .............................................................. 10 Precambrian rocks ............................................... 10 Paleozoic rocks ................................................. 10 Mesozoic
    [Show full text]
  • Passive Monitoring of Ambient Reactive Gaseous Mercury in The
    Passive Monitoring of Ambient Reactive Gaseous Mercury ihFin the Four Corners Area, Eastern OklhOklahoma, an d Central/East Texas: Important Method Evaluation and Baseline Work Presented at the National Air Toxics Monitoring and Data Analysis Workshop, Dallas, Texas, April 7, 2011. • Mark Sather, U.S. EPA Region 6, Air Quality Analysis Section • (214) 665-8353, [email protected] 1 Introduction • This presentation will summarize the first year of a two year monitoring project estimating reactive gaseous mercury (RGM, a.k.a. gaseous oxidized mercury, GOM) dry deposition in the Four Corners area and eastern Oklahoma, and preview a similar study to be done in Texas. • RGM of interest because of its chemical reactivity/water solubility; RGM readily deposits to water , soils and vegetation by both dry and wet processes; atmospheric lifetime = 0.5-2 days versus 0.5-2 years for elemental mercury which is mildly reactive and sparingly soluble in water. • Four Corners/Eastern Oklahoma project is a two year effort funded by U.S. EPA ORD Regional Applied Research Effort (RARE) program; the upcoming Texas study will also be funded by RARE . • Project Collaborators: U.S. EPA Region 6, U.S. EPA ORD, Frontier Geosci/lbliiences/Global Sciences, Ali on, NMED, NPS, USFS/ BLM, Jemez Pueblo/Valles Caldera Trust, Cherokee Nation. • Ambient monitoring began in August, 2009, and will run through the first part of August, 2011. 2 Project Objectives • To gather first-time RGM dry deposition estimates for 24 consecutive months at six sites in the Four Corners area to set a valuable ambient RGM dry deposition estimate baseline with proper assessment of: (a) the effectiveness of the Frontier Atmospheric Dry Deposition (FADD) surrogate surface devices in providing reliable RGM dry deposition estimates and (b) the inter-annual RGM dry deposition estimate variability.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    -» Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico By R. A. BAILEY, R. L. SMITH, and C. S. ROSS CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY » GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1274-P New Stratigraphic names and revisions in nomenclature of upper Tertiary and , Quaternary volcanic rocks in the Jemez Mountains UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract.._..._________-...______.._-.._._____.. PI Introduction. -_-________.._.____-_------___-_______------_-_---_-_ 1 General relations._____-___________--_--___-__--_-___-----___---__. 2 Keres Group..__________________--------_-___-_------------_------ 2 Canovas Canyon Rhyolite..__-__-_---_________---___-____-_--__ 5 Paliza Canyon Formation.___-_________-__-_-__-__-_-_______--- 6 Bearhead Rhyolite-___________________________________________ 8 Cochiti Formation.._______________________________________________ 8 Polvadera Group..______________-__-_------________--_-______---__ 10 Lobato Basalt______________________________________________ 10 Tschicoma Formation_______-__-_-____---_-__-______-______-- 11 El Rechuelos Rhyolite--_____---------_--------------_-_------- 11 Puye Formation_________________------___________-_--______-.__- 12 Tewa Group__._...._.______........___._.___.____......___...__ 12 Bandelier Tuff.______________.______________... 13 Tsankawi Pumice Bed._____________________________________ 14 Valles Rhyolite______.__-___---_____________.________..__ 15 Deer Canyon Member.______-_____-__.____--_--___-__-____ 15 Redondo Creek Member.__________________________________ 15 Valle Grande Member____-__-_--___-___--_-____-___-._-.__ 16 Battleship Rock Member...______________________________ 17 El Cajete Member____..._____________________ 17 Banco Bonito Member.___-_--_---_-_----_---_----._____--- 18 References .
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Hydrology of Valles Caldera and the Southwestern Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO By Frank W. Trainer, Robert J. Rogers, and Michael L. Sorey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 5338 Montgomery NE, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Albuquerque, NM 87109-1311 Information regarding research and data-collection programs of the U.S. Geological Survey is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the Home Page for the New Mexico District Office using the URL: http://nm.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................ 2 Purpose and scope........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Vegetation Map of the Valles Caldera National Preserve, New
    ______________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of the Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico ______________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico 1 Esteban Muldavin, Paul Neville, Charlie Jackson, and Teri Neville2 2006 ______________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY To support the management and sustainability of the ecosystems of the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP), a map of current vegetation was developed. The map was based on aerial photography from 2000 and Landsat satellite imagery from 1999 and 2001, and was designed to serve natural resources management planning activities at an operational scale of 1:24,000. There are 20 map units distributed among forest, shrubland, grassland, and wetland ecosystems. Each map unit is defined in terms of a vegetation classification that was developed for the preserve based on 348 ground plots. An annotated legend is provided with details of vegetation composition, environment, and distribution of each unit in the preserve. Map sheets at 1:32,000 scale were produced, and a stand-alone geographic information system was constructed to house the digital version of the map. In addition, all supporting field data was compiled into a relational database for use by preserve managers. Cerro La Jarra in Valle Grande of the Valles Caldera National Preserve (Photo: E. Muldavin) 1 Final report submitted in April 4, 2006 in partial fulfillment of National Prak Service Award No. 1443-CA-1248- 01-001 and Valles Caldrea Trust Contract No. VCT-TO 0401. 2 Esteban Muldavin (Senior Ecologist), Charlie Jackson (Mapping Specialist), and Teri Neville (GIS Specialist) are with Natural Heritage New Mexico of the Museum of Southwestern Biology at the University of New Mexico (UNM); Paul Neville is with the Earth Data Analysis Center (EDAC) at UNM.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: the Hydrologic System of the Middle Rio Grande Basin
    Chapter 4: The hydrologic system of the Middle Rio Grande Basin In discussions of the water resources of an area, the hydrologic system is commonly split into two components for convenience: surface water and ground water. However, in the Middle Rio Grande Basin, as in most other locales, the surface- and ground-water systems are intimately linked through a series of complex interactions. These interactions often make it difficult to recognize the boundary between the two systems. In The Rio Grande is the only river I ever this report, the surface- and ground-water systems are described separately, saw that needed irrigation. –attributed to though one of the goals of the report is to show that they are both parts of Will Rogers the hydrologic system of the Middle Rio Grande Basin and that changes in one often affect the other. As defined earlier, in this report “Middle Rio Grande Basin” refers to the geologic basin defined by the extent of deposits of Cenozoic age along the Rio Grande from about Cochiti Dam to about San Acacia. This definition includes nearly the entire ground-water basin; however, the extent of the surface-water basin is delimited topographically by drainage divides and is consequently somewhat larger than the ground-water basin. Surface-water system The most prominent hydrologic feature in the Middle Rio Grande Basin is the Rio Grande, which flows through the entire length of the basin, generally from north to south. The fifth longest river in the United States, its headwaters are in the mountains of southern Colorado. The Rio Grande is the largest river in New Mexico, with a drainage area of 14,900 square miles where it enters the Middle Rio Grande Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • July 13, 2015 Cons: # 02ENNM00
    New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office 2105 Osuna NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113 Phone: (505) 346-2525 Fax: (505) 346-2542 July 13, 2015 Cons: # 02ENNM00-2014-F-0266 Maria T. Garcia, Forest Supervisor Santa Fe National Forest 11 Forest Lane Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508 Dear Ms. Garcia: Thank you for your request for formal consultation and conferencing with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). We began early coordination with you and received a Biological Assessment (BA) (dated June 6, 2014) and supplemental information, which evaluate the impacts of the Southwest Jemez Mountains Restoration Project Santa Fe National Forest Jemez Ranger District Sandoval County, New Mexico (Restoration Project). At issue are potential impacts from the proposed action on the Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) (MSO) and its critical habitat, the Jemez Mountains salamander (Plethodon neomexicanus) (salamander) and its critical habitat, the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) and its proposed critical habitat, and the Rio Grande Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis) (cutthroat trout). You determined that the proposed action “may affect, is likely to adversely affect” the MSO and its designated critical habitat, the salamander and its designated critical habitat, the jumping mouse and its proposed critical habitat. This biological opinion does not rely on the regulatory definition of “destruction or adverse modification” of critical habitat at 50 CFR 402.02. Instead, we have relied upon the statute and the August 6, 2004, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Gifford Pinchot Task Force v.
    [Show full text]
  • Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2002 Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource Lauren Meyer University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Meyer, Lauren, "Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource" (2002). Theses (Historic Preservation). 508. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Meyer, Lauren (2002). Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Meyer, Lauren (2002). Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 uNivERsmy PENNSYLV^NL^ UBKARIE5 Frijoles Canyon, The Preservation of A Resource Lauren Meyer A THESIS In Historic Preservation
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Guadalupe Stream Inventory Report Santa Fe National Forest Surveyed: June – July 2004 Forest Fisheries Crew
    Rio Guadalupe Stream Inventory Report Santa Fe National Forest Surveyed: June – July 2004 Forest Fisheries Crew Report By Tara Anderson, Fisheries Technician Dylan Hoffman, Fisheries Technician Chuck Dentino, Fisheries Biologist Reviewed By Sean Ferrell Forest Fisheries Biologist Santa Fe National Forest February 2006 Versions of this document were reviewed, edited and approved by the following individual: Bill Britton, Forest Biologist, USDA Forest Service, Santa Fe National Forest Table of Contents Section Page Number Map of the area 3 Introduction 4 Basin Summary 6 Executive Summary 7 Habitat Characteristics 9 Reach by Reach Comparison 12 Tributaries 13 Stream Flow 14 Water Quality 15 Riparian Vegetation 20 Beaver Activity 21 Fisheries 23 Wildlife 25 Stream Improvements 27 Land Use Cultural Resources 27 Timber Harvest 30 Mining 31 Roads 31 Fires 33 Grazing 34 Recreation 35 Recommendation Summary 37 Reach Summaries 40 Reach 1: Private Land: Not Surveyed 41 Reach 2: Above Private Land to the USGS Station Below the Guadalupe Box 42 Reach 3: USGS Station below the Guadalupe Box to Upper End of Guadalupe Box 48 Reach 4: Top of Guadalupe Box to the Bottom of the Upper Box Canyon 54 Reach 5: Bottom of the Upper Box Canyon to the Top of the Upper Box Canyon 64 Appendix A 69 Appendix B 70 Glossary 71 Literature Cited 73 Acknowledgements 76 Map 1. Rio Guadalupe from the headwaters to its confluence with Jemez River and its designated reaches (2004). 3 This document is a specialist report. It is meant to assist managers in understanding current conditions of a stream corridor and possibly how those conditions have developed over a period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Natural Streamflow in the Jemez River at the Boundaries of Indian Lands, Central New Mexico
    ESTIMATION OF NATURAL STREAMFLOW IN THE JEMEZ RIVER AT THE BOUNDARIES OF INDIAN LANDS, CENTRAL NEW MEXICO by Edward E. Fischer and John P. Borland U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 82-4113 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS Albuquerque, New Mexico 1983 Cover i__ Upper--The Jemez River downstream from San Ysidro, looking south- southwest. Flow is from right to left. Lower Jemez Canyon Dam. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: Open-File Services Section ..District Chief Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Box 25425, Federal Center 505 Marquette NW, Room 720 Lakewood, Colorado 80225 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (303) 234-5888 ii CONTEHTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Previous studies 2 Data used 3 Method of study 6 Man-made changes in the basin that could affect flow 7 Irrigation diversions 7 Inter-basin diversion 7 Re s ervo i r s 8 San Gregorio Reservoir 8 Seven Springs State Fish Hatchery 8 Fenton Lake 10 Jemez Canyon Reservoir 10 Water losses due to man-made changes 10 Irrigation diversions 10 Inter-basin diversion 11 Reservoirs 1 1 San Gregorio Reservoir, Seven Springs State Fish Hatchery, and Fenton Lake 11 Jemez Canyon Reservoir - 12 Natural streamflow at the upstream boundary of the Jemez Indian Reservation 13 Natural streamflow at the Jemez-Zia Indian Reservation boundary 13 Natural streamflow at the Zia-Santa Ana Indian Reservation Natural streamflow at the downstream boundary of the Santa Ana .
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Region New Mexico Congressional Briefing
    United States Department of Agriculture 2018 Southwestern Region New Mexico Congressional Briefing Photo: West Fork Gila National Forest Carson National Forest • Cibola National Forest & National Grasslands Gila National Forest • Lincoln National Forest • Santa Fe National Forest Forest Service Southwestern Region April 2018 Message from the Regional Forester We designed this briefing packet to be your quick reference guide to the Southwestern Region of the Forest Service. Organized by forest and by program area, the most up-to-date information is at your fingertips. This is intended as one tool to bolster our working relationships, as we continue to engage with you on a variety of issues that are of interest to your constituents. Under the direction of Secretary Sonny Perdue, the Forest Service was, for the first time, named in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s priorities: to foster productive and sustainable use of our National Forest System Lands. Our agency strategic plan is in alignment with the department’s priorities, and our Southwestern Region (also known as Region 3) priorities, the R3’s 3Rs, are in concert with both. Our first priority is Restoration at the landscape scale, to provide livelihoods and valued products. The second is Recreation, sustaining the connection to nature for health and economic vitality. The third is Relationships, both externally with those we serve, and internally with our workforce. It is through our relationships with tribes, stakeholders, partners, other agencies, and the public that we are able to restore landscapes and provide for sustainable recreation opportunitites. We also value our internal relationships and are actively taking steps to provide a safe, rewarding and resilient workplace for all Forest Service employees.
    [Show full text]