OFFICIAL
Chief Officer Team Briefing for COM
Title: Anti-Social Behaviour Report COT Sponsor: ACC Hankinson Report Author: Sergeant Kate Connelly Date: 15th September 2020
SUMMARY
This report outlines the Force’s current position in relation to Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB). It includes details of the current trends in relation to ASB calls and locations within each District in West Yorkshire. It also contains data detailing the volume of recorded incidents, repeat rates, public perception and satisfaction.
West Yorkshire Police along with our partner agencies continue to face significant challenges during the COVID 19 pandemic. This report explains the issues experienced by the communities of West Yorkshire during the lockdown and how West Yorkshire Police has pro-actively addressed these additional challenges.
ASB LEGISLATION The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 came into force in March 2015. This was a significant change in the structure of the legislation with a reduction from 19 available powers to 6:
Injunctions to prevent nuisance and noise (INPAs) Criminal Behaviour Orders (CBOs) Dispersal Powers Community Protection Notices (CPNs) Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) Closure Powers This change consolidated and simplified the law in relation to ASB. For local involvement and accountability, the Act also includes the following measures:
ASB Case Review (Community Trigger) – Victims can activate a multi-agency review of their case and agencies can use early intervention techniques to try to resolve the issue. A recent review of Community Triggers confirmed each District has a publicised procedure in place for when a Community Trigger request is made Community Remedy – In some cases, the victim can have a say in the outcome
1 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
ASB GOVERNANCE The Force uses Storm and Corvus computer systems to produce monthly Management Information for each District and for the Force. The Storm interface is on the Bluestar platform and is where all contact to the Police is recorded. This includes 999/101 telephone calls, web chats and online reporting. Corvus is a tasking and intelligence system, which is also developed by Bluestar. It contains information about the volume and types of ASB incidents and how they are dealt with. This data enables the Force to identify whether rates are increasing or decreasing. ASB victim satisfaction is monitored through the Victim User Satisfaction Surveys, which are carried out each month. The survey covers all aspects of the victim’s journey with the police, including ease of contact; speed of arrival; actions taken; keeping informed of progress; treatment and overall satisfaction. The response provides an insight into how the victim is left feeling following their interaction with the police and feeds into the service recovery process. The existing satisfaction survey is currently under review alongside the question sets asked to any person reporting ASB in West Yorkshire. This review is due to be completed by October 2020.
REPORTED ASB AND COVID-19 Between July 2019 and February 2020, the total overall reported number of ASB incidents showed a reduction for all Districts compared to the same period the previous year, with most showing a gradual month on month reduction. This demonstrates the continued hard work and commitment the Force and Neighbourhood Teams have undertaken to reduce ASB across our communities (A full monthly breakdown for each District is shown in Appendix A).
West Yorkshire – Total ASB Incidents 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % Jul 5443 4866 -577 -10.6% Aug 5233 4991 -242 -4.6% Sep 4178 3888 -290 -6.9% Oct 4243 4292 49 1.2% Nov 3568 3402 -166 -4.7% Dec 2883 2668 -215 -7.5% Jan 3037 3071 34 1.1% Feb 3471 2794 -677 -19.5% Mar 3384 4118 734 21.7% Apr 3856 3402 -454 -11.8% May 3734 4585 851 22.8% Jun 3701 5389 1688 45.6% Total 46731 47466 735 1.6%
However, from the period at the beginning of COVID 19 and onwards (Mar 20 to June 20) the number of reported incidents compared to the same period in 2019 showed a significant increase of 2819 reported incidents compared to the same time the previous year.
2 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
In March 2020, the initial spike in ASB calls recorded coincided with the national COVID 19 lockdown on the 23rd March. This was mainly due to our Call Centre staff recording COVID 19 related concern incidents as ASB as there was no other code available at that time. This was rectified by the end of March 2020. In April 2020, which was the height of the full lockdown the number of ASB calls reduced below the 2019 levels for all five Districts. As the restrictions began to be lifted, the number of reported ASB incidents increased significantly during May and June respectively as shown on the timeline.
This increase in reported ASB was expected and is the result of a number of contributing factors such as:
During the relaxation of the Government COVID lockdown rules, there was a large degree of confusion within our communities as to what constituted a breach of the lockdown and what was general ASB A large percentage of the population were at home for an increased number of hours during the day due to furlough and shielding and were therefore able to witness and report more activity Schools were closed therefore more children and young people had longer opportunity to be outside in open spaces The UK enjoyed warm dry weather, particularly in May There were the Bank Holiday periods and VE celebrations The death of George Floyd in May brought large numbers of people onto the streets The easing of regulations gave people a feeling of freedom and an opportunity to express themselves Some individuals rebelled against imposed regulations and restrictions as they regarded it as an impingement on their right to freedom and expression The increase was visible across all Districts in May and June 2020.
3 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
ASB PROFILE APRIL-JUNE 2020 In order to understand the increase in incidents, the data in the table below shows the breakdown analysis comparing the year to date data figures. This coincides with the COVID 19 lockdown period. The overall total ASB figures show that in most Districts the volume increased between 14.2% and 18.7% except in Calderdale where it shows an increase of 44.8%. Historically the number of ASB reports in Calderdale have always been low so any increase will show as a higher percentage than the larger Districts.
Long Term Volume (YTD) Long Term Per 1,000 Pop Short Term Trend ‐ ASB per Day West 19/20 20/21 +/‐ 19/20 20/21 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 Trend Yorkshire Rank West Yorkshire 11,083 13,158 18.7% 7.1 8.4 154 112 145 177
1 Leeds 3,805 4,444 16.8% 8.8 10.2 54.7 37.1 48.3 61.1
2 Bradford 2,865 3,342 16.6% 5.5 6.4 38.9 28.5 37.5 44.2
3 Kirklees 1,956 2,314 18.3% 4.6 5.5 25.1 21.3 25.2 29.8
4 Wakefield 1,634 1,866 14.2% 10.5 12.0 22.7 16.0 19.9 25.6
5 Calderdale 823 1,192 44.8% 23.4 33.9 12.2 8.9 13.8 16.6
The table in Appendix B shows each District’s ASB incident type. It is immediately apparent that nuisance motorcycle / quad bike category was the highest daily volume during April (36.8/day) and May (48.7/day). The change is in June when youth related ASB has the highest daily volume (46.7) however, the nuisance motorcycle / quad bike was second (38.2/day). A similar pattern can be seen across each District by varying degrees. Breaking down the nuisance motorcycle / Quad Bike occurrences further (Appendix C) shows there is an increase in all Districts to variable degrees. The largest increase in incidents was during May in Calderdale with an 829.4% increase in reports. However, this increase equated to 158 reports compared to only 17 the previous year. The monthly comparison for June 2020 shows a reduction in reported incidents across all Districts which is more reflective of the previous year. There is now a dedicated Problem Solving Occurrence (PSO) to address the main report areas and to increase patrols at the key times. In partnership with the Local Authority, two operations have been conducted and positive results shared with the communities via a press release. A further two operations are due to be completed in September 2020. Appendix C shows an overall increase of 1732 nuisance motorcycle / Quad Bike for the months April - June compared to the same period in 2019. Of note from the crime incident type in Appendix B, Alcohol and Youth related ASB decreased in the three months in the year to date (April to June) compared to the same period last year. Again, this is directly attributed to the lockdown and the closure of public houses. June has seen a return to the normal expected levels. There has also been an increase in neighbour related incidents, which features in the top three for all Districts and the Force. This can be attributed to the COVID-19 lockdown as more people were at home over this period and covers incidents including noise nuisance as well as verbal disputes.
4 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
REPEAT CALL LOCATIONS In relation to the top 10 repeat call locations, it is evident that the nuisance motorcycle / quad bike incidents dominate the figures for all Districts. The charts in Appendix D show that in each District over 50% were locations where calls were received reporting repeat vehicle related offences. Nuisance youths alongside vehicle offences is the second main contributor. Overall, for West Yorkshire, 70% of the top repeat locations for the Force were vehicle or youth related issues. In order to tackle the identified issues bespoke Patrol Plans were created for the Neighbourhood Teams. Positive traffic enforcement messages were published on the Forces social media sites to inform the public that the Force were aware of the issues and taking action. In addition, Kirklees District are shortly increasing the capacity of their Off Road Bike Team by a further member to continue to address the off road bike issues and to provide more visible and proactive patrols. In Bradford District, many of the repeat locations are due to ASB vehicle usage particularly quads and motorcycles that have been used in Ravenscliffe / Calverley Woods. Ranelagh Avenue and Roundwood Glen, which are both in the top three repeat locations, are the main entry points to enter the woodland area on vehicles. Cross border, operations have been carried out between the Bradford Steerside Team, Leeds Off Road Bike Team, Leeds North West NPT and Bradford East NPT. Positive action has been taken in order to prevent further escalation of ASB. Officers are also working with stakeholders, the landowners and Bradford Local Authority to block access points to the woods. When comparing the repeat victim / caller’s information there seems to be an increase in those experiencing multiple incidents based on rolling figures for the last 12 months (Appendix E). In April and May, there were fewer repeat locations than the same months in 2019. This also correlates with the main issue being Nuisance motorcycle / quad bikes as there are a limited number of locations where the bikes congregate compared to other incident types. Whilst the number of repeat locations is somewhat dependant on the ASB volume recorded, there are 50 more repeat locations in West Yorkshire in June 2020 than in June 2019 (+11.1%). This can be linked to the increase in youth reported incidents in June, as these locations are more likely to be wider spread and accessible to youths. Since April, there has been a reduction in calls for service at community venues, hospitals and bus stations, mainly due to the footfall at these locations reducing dramatically during the lockdown. This is demonstrated in Leeds District where St James’s Hospital and Seacroft Green Shopping Centre are no longer in the top repeat locations since April. In Leeds City Centre, calls to the LGI during this period reduced by 25% from 220 to 171. Likewise, in Wakefield District where both Pontefract and Wakefield Bus Stations have been in the top repeat lists, they now no longer appear. The Force is aware that these type of calls will gradually increase as lockdown eases. The Force is working with different partners to review new ways of operating. For example, the Bradford Neighbourhood Teams are currently liaising with the retail sector to see what lessons can be learned from the lockdown and the reductions in thefts, to see if any new practices can be shared and adopted to keep offending at a minimum.
5 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
ASVAT (Anti-Social and Vulnerability Assessment Tool) The ASVAT system was launched within West Yorkshire in December 2019 across all five Districts. The purpose of it is to enable staff to review ASB calls easily and to evaluate and identify risk effectively. The ASVAT has been designed to identify risks for repeat callers / victims, which may have been overlooked in the initial screening call process. The system is still in its infancy and additional Call Types will be added to the Review Templates over the next 12 months. The ASVAT system currently reviews all ASB calls but this will increase to include Public Order offences and Concern for Safety calls. The initial feedback from the Neighbourhood Policing teams is positive and the system is being integrated into their daily working practices and problem solving occurrences
PROBLEM SOLVING OCCURRENCE REVIEW Following West Yorkshire Police’s participation in a National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) Peer Review of Neighbourhood Policing, a number of recommendations were highlighted for consideration after our inspection by Merseyside Police. One recommendation was to examine the total number of Problem Solving Occurrences (PSO) within WYP and our ability to successfully manage such a high volume. In October 2019, Local Policing conducted a full audit of over 750 PSOs within the Force. The review resulted in the development of a new PSO process in relation to the creation and authorisation of a PSO, content, action plan required and frequency of review to the point of finalisation. Local Policing also identified other departments, which were recording information on a PSO that should have been recorded in a different format. Because of this, they developed a solution on the Niche computer system for this information to be placed under the appropriate alternative “Non Crime Occurrences”. The total number of PSOs currently stands at 172 across West Yorkshire. These are now at a manageable level, are regularly reviewed and have bespoke action plans for the NPT officers to follow. They also record all partnership work undertaken to solve the problem. A new supervisor review template has been created on Niche to support NPT Supervisors to ensure their reviews are timely, specific, appropriate and corporate. In addition to this, a finalisation template has been devised which links directly with a new ‘What Works Well’ submission form to review the outcome of the PSO and highlight any good practice or learning which can be shared internally and externally. This form is also used for highlighting tactics, which did not work well to share learning and experience across the Force. Local Policing has created a new mailbox for staff and partners to forward their submission forms to be reviewed, evaluated and published.
6 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
PUBLIC PERCEPTION AND SATISFACTION
Overall, satisfaction, in respect of ASB has remained static compared to the 2019/20 outturn. There has been slight increases in nearly all areas of satisfaction over the last three months. There has been a minor decrease of only 0.3% in satisfaction with regards ‘Actions taken by the Police’ compared to the previous year’s outturn (Appendix F). As previously mentioned, further work is currently being undertaken to review the Satisfaction Survey and this work will be completed by October 2020.
FUTURE
West Yorkshire Police will continue to work with partners to reduce ASB. This will include taking the following approaches:
Problem Solving Occurrences - ensure all PSOs are identified, recorded and managed correctly. Each PSO will have a tailored response and action plan evaluating its effectiveness. Good practice will be shared on the Force’s “What Works Well” webpage and the Neighbourhood Learn Forum. Hot Spots Policing – Targeting police and partner resources and activities to those places where crime is most concentrated using the new electronic mapping facilities ASVAT – Monitoring all ASB calls and highlighting vulnerability to ensure Police and partners intervene at the earliest opportunity to reduce threat, risk and harm to individuals Mentoring – Police and partners working with individuals over an extended period to enable them to benefit from the knowledge, ability and experience of the mentor. This will give them a chance to make a difference in society and understand their rights Pol-Ed – a resource that is being created by police for schools and will be learning delivered by teachers as part of the mandated Personal, Health, Social and Economic (PHSE) inputs. This will teach young people about offences and is a joint enterprise to highlight what ASB offences are and the negative impact this behaviour has on individuals and communities
SUMMARY
Up until the end of March 2020, the total number of reported ASB incidents was declining on a month on month basis across all Districts within West Yorkshire. Partnership working practices, especially around early action and engagement have become embedded since the NPT Model was launched in 2018. Providing clarity around controlling and managing PSOs has enabled our NPTs to focus on the most vulnerable and high-risk areas within their communities.
Following the outbreak of COVID 19 and lockdown challenges, the Force has worked hard to understand the new demands and effects on our communities. We have used technology to engage safely with our communities and partners by using social media effectively and holding virtual meetings across different platforms. WY Community Alert has provided an additional engagement platform and the number of sign-ups continues to increase each month.
7 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
ASB reports did increase during the lockdown period with the majority of these calls involving off road motorcycles / quads. Additional work has been undertaken with partner agencies to address these issues. The Force regularly reviews ASB data, especially for repeat locations and callers to ensure we provide the best possible service to our communities. We will continue to work with our partners, communities and other agencies to manage and address demand.
8 | P a g e
OFFICIAL
Appendix A
Bradford Calderdale Kirklees 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % Jul 1371 1208 -163 -11.9% 391 354 -37 -9.5% 1022 864 -158 -15.5% Aug 1283 1248 -35 -2.7% 373 390 17 4.6% 898 838 -60 -6.7% Sep 1072 946 -126 -11.8% 256 313 57 22.3% 648 627 -21 -3.2% Oct 1072 1134 62 5.8% 268 336 68 25.4% 703 640 -63 -9.0% Nov 887 834 -53 -6.0% 258 267 9 3.5% 611 544 -67 -11.0% Dec 665 581 -84 -12.6% 224 192 -32 -14.3% 488 428 -60 -12.3% Jan 709 643 -66 -9.3% 250 245 -5 -2.0% 468 464 -4 -0.9% Feb 857 609 -248 -28.9% 314 207 -107 -34.1% 596 427 -169 -28.4% Mar 747 1009 262 35.1% 228 330 102 44.7% 550 676 126 55.9% Apr 1011 858 -153 -15.1% 305 268 -37 -12.1% 679 648 -31 -4.6% May 914 1174 260 28.4% 283 430 147 51.9% 664 791 127 19.1% Jun 977 1338 361 36.9% 251 498 247 98.4% 625 902 277 44.3% Total 11565 11582 17 0.1% 3401 3830 429 12.6% 7952 7849 -103 -1.3%
Leeds Wakefield West Yorkshire - Total 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % Jul 1862 1734 -128 -6.9% 760 666 -94 -12.4% 5443 4866 -577 -10.6% Aug 1820 1685 -135 -7.4% 837 795 -42 -5.0% 5233 4991 -242 -4.6% Sep 1580 1379 -201 -12.7% 597 612 15 2.5% 4178 3888 -290 -6.9% Oct 1557 1538 -19 -1.2% 613 626 13 2.1% 4243 4292 49 1.2% Nov 1243 1243 0 0.0% 540 492 -48 -8.9% 3568 3402 -166 -4.7% Dec 1030 981 -49 -4.8% 457 462 5 1.1% 2883 2668 -215 -7.5% Jan 1070 1099 29 2.7% 527 605 78 14.8% 3037 3071 34 1.1% Feb 1155 1043 -112 -9.7% 529 486 -43 -8.1% 3471 2794 -677 -19.5% Mar 1190 1495 305 25.6% 646 580 -66 -10.2% 3384 4118 734 21.7% Apr 1251 1124 -127 -10.2% 585 494 -91 -15.6% 3856 3402 -454 11.8% May 1301 1511 210 16.1% 552 650 98 17.8% 3734 4585 851 22.8% Jun 1289 1849 560 43.4% 525 781 256 48.8% 3701 5389 1688 45.6% Total 16348 16681 333 2.0% 7168 7249 81 1.1% 46731 47466 735 1.6%
9 | P a g e
OFFICIAL Appendix B
Anti‐Social Behaviour Breakdown Analysis ‐ June 2020
Rank West Yorkshire 19/20 20/21 +/‐ 19/20 20/21 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 Trend 1 Nuisance Motorcycle/Quad Bike 2,059 3,760 82.6% 1.3 2.4 21.8 36.8 48.7 38.2
2 Neighbour Related 1,856 2,753 48.3% 1.2 1.8 19.2 27.3 29.7 33.8
3 Youth Related 3,788 2,569 ‐32.2% 2.4 1.6 50.2 14.5 23.6 46.7
4 Adult Nuisance ‐ Non Alcohol 1,785 2,254 26.3% 1.1 1.4 24.4 21.0 22.6 30.8 Related 5 Nuisance Car/Van 620 1,140 83.9% 0.4 0.7 6.7 7.2 12.7 17.6
6 Alcohol 745 454 ‐39.1% 0.5 0.3 6.4 3.1 4.7 7.2
7 Littering/Drugs Paraphernalia 128 166 29.7% 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3
8 Fireworks/Snowballing 102 62 ‐39.2% 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.8
Rank Leeds 19/20 20/21 +/‐ 19/20 20/21 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 Trend 1 Nuisance Motorcycle/Quad Bike 691 1,165 68.6% 1.6 2.7 8.4 11.3 15.8 11.1
2 Neighbour Related 644 992 54.0% 1.5 2.3 7.1 9.7 10.3 12.7
3 Youth Related 1,239 914 ‐26.2% 2.9 2.1 18.4 5.3 8.4 16.5
4 Adult Nuisance ‐ Non Alcohol 686 811 18.2% 1.6 1.9 9.2 7.1 8.5 11.2 Related 5 Nuisance Car/Van 180 299 66.1% 0.4 0.7 1.6 1.9 2.6 5.4
6 Alcohol 286 173 ‐39.5% 0.7 0.4 2.3 1.1 1.7 2.9
7 Littering/Drugs Paraphernalia 46 71 54.3% 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.0
8 Fireworks/Snowballing 33 19 ‐42.4% 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3
Rank Bradford 19/20 20/21 +/‐ 19/20 20/21 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 Trend 1 Nuisance Motorcycle/Quad Bike 628 1,093 74.0% 1.2 2.1 4.8 9.8 13.9 12.2
2 Youth Related 940 653 ‐30.5% 1.8 1.2 12.5 3.5 6.3 11.8
3 Neighbour Related 492 649 31.9% 0.9 1.2 4.7 6.5 7.8 7.1
4 Adult Nuisance ‐ Non Alcohol 422 441 4.5% 0.8 0.8 6.0 4.6 4.1 5.8 Related 5 Nuisance Car/Van 167 361 116.2% 0.3 0.7 2.4 2.8 4.0 5.2
6 Alcohol 135 90 ‐33.3% 0.3 0.2 1.6 0.8 0.9 1.2
7 Littering/Drugs Paraphernalia 40 37 ‐7.5% 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6
8 Fireworks/Snowballing 41 18 ‐56.1% 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3
Rank Kirklees 19/20 20/21 +/‐ 19/20 20/21 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 Trend 1 Nuisance Motorcycle/Quad Bike 417 668 60.2% 1.0 1.6 3.5 7.8 7.8 6.4
2 Neighbour Related 349 454 30.1% 0.8 1.1 3.7 4.5 4.8 5.7
3 Youth Related 624 420 ‐32.7% 1.5 1.0 8.0 2.5 3.6 7.8
4 Adult Nuisance ‐ Non Alcohol 256 410 60.2% 0.6 1.0 3.8 4.6 4.1 4.8 Related 5 Nuisance Car/Van 148 233 57.4% 0.4 0.6 1.4 1.1 3.3 3.3
6 Alcohol 131 88 ‐32.8% 0.3 0.2 0.9 0.5 1.0 1.4
7 Littering/Drugs Paraphernalia 18 29 61.1% 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4
8 Fireworks/Snowballing 13 12 ‐7.7% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Rank Wakefield 19/20 20/21 +/‐ 19/20 20/21 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 Trend 1 Nuisance Motorcycle/Quad Bike 240 505 110.4% 1.5 3.2 3.6 6.0 6.1 4.5
2 Neighbour Related 235 418 77.9% 1.5 2.7 2.1 4.0 4.5 5.3
10 | P a g e
OFFICIAL 3 Adult Nuisance ‐ Non Alcohol 281 406 44.5% 1.8 2.6 3.2 3.0 3.9 6.5 Related 4 Youth Related 630 333 ‐47.1% 4.0 2.1 7.4 1.9 3.2 6.0
5 Nuisance Car/Van 89 115 29.2% 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.3 1.9
6 Alcohol 135 65 ‐51.9% 0.9 0.4 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.1
7 Littering/Drugs Paraphernalia 18 15 ‐16.7% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2
8 Fireworks/Snowballing 6 9 50.0% 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1
Rank Calderdale 19/20 20/21 +/‐ 19/20 20/21 Mar 20 Apr 20 May 20 Jun 20 Trend 1 Nuisance Motorcycle/Quad Bike 83 329 296.4% 2.4 9.4 1.5 1.8 5.1 3.9
2 Youth Related 355 249 ‐29.9% 10.1 7.1 4.0 1.4 2.2 4.7
3 Neighbour Related 136 240 76.5% 3.9 6.8 1.7 2.6 2.3 3.0
4 Adult Nuisance ‐ Non Alcohol 140 186 32.9% 4.0 5.3 2.3 1.7 2.0 2.5 Related 5 Nuisance Car/Van 36 132 266.7% 1.0 3.8 0.5 0.8 1.6 1.9
6 Alcohol 58 38 ‐34.5% 1.7 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.6
7 Littering/Drugs Paraphernalia 6 14 133.3% 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1
8 Fireworks/Snowballing 9 4 ‐55.6% 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Appendix C
11 | P a g e
OFFICIAL Anti Social Behaviour Incidents - 'Nuisance Motorcycle/Quad Bike'
Bradford Calderdale Kirklees 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % Jul 271 207 -64 -23.6% 35 30 -5 -14.3% 231 199 -32 -13.9% Aug 234 254 20 8.5% 56 50 -6 -10.7% 189 146 -43 -22.8% Sep 194 147 -47 -24.2% 25 39 14 56.0% 125 108 -17 -13.6% Oct 124 84 -40 -32.3% 24 16 -8 -33.3% 88 69 -19 -21.6% Nov 69 59 -10 -14.5% 11 35 24 218.2% 110 36 -74 -67.3% Dec 100 85 -15 -15.0% 16 10 -6 -37.5% 54 43 -11 -20.4% Jan 89 82 -7 -7.9% 9 31 22 244.4% 62 78 16 25.8% Feb 165 87 -78 -47.3% 23 26 3 13.0% 92 48 -44 -47.8% Mar 114 149 35 30.7% 14 47 33 235.7% 95 109 14 14.7% Apr 205 294 89 43.4% 32 55 23 71.9% 111 236 125 112.6% May 175 436 261 149.1% 17 158 141 829.4% 151 243 92 60.9% Jun 251 372 121 48.2% 34 117 83 244.1% 156 193 37 23.7% Total 1991 2256 265 13.3% 296 614 318 107.4% 1464 1508 44 3.0% Apr-Jun 631 1102 471 74.6% 83 330 247 297.6% 418 672 254 60.8%
Leeds Wakefield West Yorkshire - Total 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % 2018-19 2019-20 +/- vol +/- % Jul 224 318 94 42.0% 149 97 -52 -34.9% 911 853 -58 -6.4% Aug 269 250 -19 -7.1% 163 141 -22 -13.5% 914 842 -72 -7.9% Sep 216 217 1 0.5% 110 87 -23 -20.9% 673 598 -75 -11.1% Oct 192 157 -35 -18.2% 79 63 -16 -20.3% 508 390 -118 -23.2% Nov 108 92 -16 -14.8% 64 26 -38 -59.4% 362 248 -114 -31.5% Dec 106 142 36 34.0% 63 42 -21 -33.3% 339 324 -15 -4.4% Jan 140 158 18 12.9% 73 74 1 1.4% 373 425 52 13.9% Feb 147 155 8 5.4% 86 73 -13 -15.1% 515 389 -126 -24.5% Mar 166 261 95 57.2% 105 115 10 9.5% 495 682 187 37.8% Apr 239 341 102 42.7% 95 187 92 96.8% 684 1115 431 63.0% May 220 495 275 125.0% 70 191 121 172.9% 635 1529 894 140.8% Jun 232 336 104 44.8% 79 140 61 77.2% 753 1160 407 54.1% Total 2259 2922 663 29.3% 1136 1236 100 8.8% 7162 8555 1393 19.4% Apr-Jun 691 1172 481 69.6% 244 518 274 112.3% 2072 3804 1732 83.6%
Appendix D 12 | P a g e
OFFICIAL Top Ten Repeat Call Locations April – June 2020
Key Nuisance MC/Quads/Vehicles Nuisance Youths Youths and M/C Bradford Calderdale Kirklees Repeat Address District Count Repeat Address District Count Repeat Address District Count RANELAGH AVE BD 28 GIBBET ST CD 15 COAL PIT LN KD 16
HOLME PARK COURT SHANN AVE BD 25 ALBERT PROM CD 10 KD 15 HOLME PARK CT
ROUNDWOOD GLEN BD 19 GIBBET ST CD 10 EALAND RD KD 13
TURNER AVE SOUTH PARKSIDE TER BD 18 CD 9 TESCO VIADUCT ST KD 13 TURNER AVE SOUTH SAINSBURYS FARFIELD AVE BD 12 CALDER TER CD 8 KD 11 SOUTHGATE OLD GRANTHAM RD BD 12 RISHWORTHIANS R U CD 8 HUDDERSFIELD RD KD 9 F C COPLEY LN AGAR ST BD 11 RYE LN CD 7 OWLER LN KD 9 STATION RD BD 10 BROW BOTTOM LN CD 6 PARK BRADBURY ST KD 9 BIERLEY LN BD 9 CROWN ST CD 6 HIGH ST KD 8 GREAT HORTON RD BD 9 ELIZABETH ST CD 6 TENTERCROFT CT KD 8
ROBERTS PARK LODGE BD 9 ROCHDALE RD CD 6 HIGHER COACH RD
Leeds Wakefield West Yorkshire Repeat Address District Count Repeat Address District Count Repeat Address District Count ACRES HALL CR LD 18 HIGH ST WD 12 RANELAGH AVE BD 28 HEATHCROFT DR LD 17 SLACK LN WD 12 SHANN AVE BD 25 PARK TEMPLE NEWSAM LD 16 WHELDON RD WD 11 ROUNDWOOD GLEN BD 19 RD WHARFEDALE CT LD 15 ASHDOWN CT WD 11 ACRES HALL CR LD 18 SCOTT HALL RD LD 12 SHEEPWALK LN WD 9 PARKSIDE TER BD 18 PONTEFRACT STONEGATE RD LD 11 RACECOURSE PARK WD 9 HEATHCROFT DR LD 17 RD THIRLMERE DR LD 11 MOORSHUTT RD WD 8 COAL PIT LN KD 16 PARK TEMPLE HANSBY PL LD 11 SOUTH AVE WD 8 LD 16 NEWSAM RD BELLE ISLE RD LD 10 LAWNS LN WD 7 GIBBET ST CD 15 CARR HILL DR LD 10 MOORHOUSE AVE WD 7 WHARFEDALE CT LD 15
SILK MILL WAY LD 10 MILLFIELD CTGS WD 7 FEARNVILLE LEISURE LD 10 CENTRE OAKWOOD LN
SCHOLEBROKE LN LD 10
13 | P a g e
OFFICIAL Appendix E
Number of repeat locations
No of Bradford Calderdale Kirklees Rpt Loc: 2018- 2019- +/- vol +/- % 2018- 2019- +/- vol +/- % 2018- 2019- +/- vol +/- % 19 20 19 20 19 20 Jul 186 132 -54 -29.0% 38 37 -1 -2.6% 114 91 -23 -20.2% Aug 208 143 -65 -31.3% 40 33 -7 -17.5% 112 97 -15 -13.4% Sep 201 152 -49 -24.4% 35 32 -3 -8.6% 111 100 -11 -9.9% Oct 191 162 -29 -15.2% 38 36 -2 -5.3% 104 108 4 3.8% Nov 166 167 1 0.6% 35 35 0 0.0% 114 115 1 0.9% Dec 148 154 6 4.1% 28 32 4 14.3% 101 99 -2 -2.0% Jan 141 137 -4 -2.8% 29 38 9 31.0% 92 81 -11 -12.0% Feb 124 111 -13 -10.5% 29 28 -1 -3.4% 85 67 -18 -21.2% Mar 102 119 17 16.7% 30 30 0 0.0% 77 66 -11 -14.3% Apr 94 105 11 11.7% 27 30 3 11.1% 79 65 -14 -17.7% May 108 106 -2 -1.9% 27 30 3 11.1% 70 63 -7 -10.0% Jun 117 129 12 10.3% 30 35 5 16.7% 74 80 6 8.1% Avg 149 135 -14 -9.5% 32 33 1 2.6% 94 86 -8 -8.9% Mth Leeds Wakefield West Yorkshire - Total 2018- 2019- +/- vol +/- % 2018- 2019- +/- vol +/- % 2018- 2019- +/- vol +/- % 19 20 19 20 19 20 Jul 240 180 -60 -25.0% 102 77 -25 -24.5% 680 517 -163 -24.0% Aug 252 209 -43 -17.1% 109 84 -25 -22.9% 721 566 -155 -21.5% Sep 270 214 -56 -20.7% 107 82 -25 -23.4% 724 580 -144 -19.9% Oct 259 230 -29 -11.2% 110 89 -21 -19.1% 702 625 -77 -11.0% Nov 230 223 -7 -3.0% 101 93 -8 -7.9% 646 633 -13 -2.0% Dec 199 206 7 3.5% 89 86 -3 -3.4% 565 577 12 2.1% Jan 167 187 20 12.0% 82 92 10 12.2% 511 535 24 4.7% Feb 150 161 11 7.3% 75 76 1 1.3% 463 443 -20 -4.3% Mar 149 159 10 6.7% 84 76 -8 -9.5% 442 450 8 1.8% Apr 139 132 -7 -5.0% 69 70 1 1.4% 408 402 -6 -1.5% May 147 145 -2 -1.4% 75 70 -5 -6.7% 427 414 -13 -3.0% Jun 151 172 21 13.9% 78 84 6 7.7% 450 500 50 11.1% Total 196 185 -11 -5.7% 90 82 -9 -9.4% 562 520 -41 -7.4%
14 | P a g e
OFFICIAL Appendix F
Satisfaction - Survey Data 2019-20 May- Change - last 12 Apr-20 Jun-20 Outturn 20 months (12m rolling) % Overall Satisfaction of Service Users - 73.6% 72.9% 73.0% 73.9% Improving ASB % Satisfied With Ease of Contacting 83.8% 84.1% 83.9% 84.2% Improving Somebody for Assistance No sig. % Satisfied With Actions Taken by Police 63.4% 62.8% 62.6% 63.1% change % Satisfied With Being Kept Informed of No sig. 45.9% 45.6% 46.6% 47.2% Progress change % Satisfied With Treatment by Police No sig. 89.9% 89.9% 89.3% 90.4% Officers and Staff change
15 | P a g e