DOCSLIB.ORG

* I^L.SH-Perl • I • ' I D Stockholders "

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
* I^L.SH-Perl • I • ' I D Stockholders 7 REPORT OF COMMUNICATION COSTS BY CORPORATIONS AND MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATIONS 1 . (a) NAME OF ORGANIZATION 2. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (Assigned by FEC) . LA6oP.efiA; Dl*TR.lfjr (b) ADDRESS (Number and Street) / 3. TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (Check Appropriate Box) D Corporation D Trade Association 1 <^<\ |v\£,6hfJTOCK r^fV Je , ^\j\r£ *5OO IS} Labor Organization D Cooperative (c) CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE D Membership Organization D Corporation without capital stock 4. TYPE OF REPORT (Check One): (a) B( April 15 Quarterly Report O July 15 Quarterly Report D October 15 Quarterly Report D12 Day Pro-General Election Report held on in the State of D January 31 Year End Report (b) Is this Report an Amendment? DYES &NO 5. THIS REPORT COVERS THE PERIOD THROUGH SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION COSTS Type of Class or Category Date(s)of Check One Identify Candidate, Office Sought, Cost of Communication Communica- Communicated Communica- District and State, and Whether for (Per Candidate) • tion With tion Support Oppose Primary or General Election ^Direct Mail D Executive/ ; Administrative - Personnel i/n o X D Telephone 1 6 £-flrrOOlPA:Tn£6 * i^l.SH-perL • i • ' i D Stockholders ". '- : .j • "• ; ..4*t, rVFTAuhsft. Mar . ...... •• .- .--. .•. 6ANO\0> D Telegram - ' . i" ' .••-•• ^Members -."so . D Other. .'•.'.'•"i'./': - . § m 2*. O (Specify) fO __C^ , 'P] D Direct Mall D Executive/ Administrative as. 0< Personnel S mrn D Telephone — 2CO D Stockholders TT — • D Telegram ro •** D Members D Other (Specify) (NOTE: For additional communications, attach separate sheets containing the same Information as above.) , . , ; ' ••'••"••'• ' TOTAL COMMUNICATION COSTS FOR THIS PERIOD $. I certify that I have examined this report and, to the best of my. knowledge and belief, it is true, correct and complete. Type or Print Name • • • Signature and Title of Person-Designated to Sign This Report. -• • /.-Daley NOTE: Submission of false, erroneous, or incomplete information may subject the person signing this report to penalties of 2 U.S.C. §437g. WHERE TO FILE: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal Election Commission •Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, N.W. Toll Free: 800-424-9530 .. Washington, D.C. 20463 .. Local: 202-694-1100 FE1AND69.PDF. FEC FORM 7(2/2001) CONSTRUCTION & GENERAL LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CHICAGO & VICINITY QUARTERLY REPORT DUE: APRIL 15,2008 SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION COST IDENTIFY CANDIDATE, OFFICE SOUGHT, DISTRICT AND STATE, AND WHETHER FOR PRIMARY OR GENERAL ELCTION NAME OFFICE DISTRICT STATE PRIMARY OR GENERAL ELECTION SENATOR DICK DURBIN U.S. SENATE N/A ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP. BOBBY RUSH U.S. CONGRESS I ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP. JESSE JACKSON JR. U.S. CONGRESS 2 ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP. DAN LIPINKSI U.S. CONGRESS 3 ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP. LUIS GUTIERREZ U.S. CONGRESS 4 ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP.RAHMEMANUEL U.S. CONGRESS 5 ILLINOIS PRIMARY JILL MORGENTHALER U.S. CONGRESS 6 ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP. DANNY DAVIS U.S. CONGRESS 7 ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP. MELISSA L. BEAN U.S. CONGRESS 8 ILLINOIS PRIMARY REP. JAN SCHAKOWSKY U.S. CONGRESS 9 ILLINOIS PRIMARY DAN SEALS U.S. CONGRESS 10 ILLINOIS PRIMARY in DEBBIE HALVORSON U.S. CONGRESS 11 ILLINOIS PRIMARY SCOTT HARPER US. CONGRESS 13 ILLINOIS PRIMARY JOHN LAESCH U.S. CONGRESS 14 ILLINOIS PRIMARY Q ROBERT ABBOUD U.S. CONGRESS 16 ILLINOIS PRIMARY K O) 1*1 o 00 Federal Election Commission ENVELOPE REPLACEMENT PAGE FOR INCOMING DOCUMENTS The FEC added this page to the end of this filing to indicate how it was received. Date of Receipt Hand Delivered y , / Postmarked / 1/ USPS First Class Mail iier/tv Postmarked (R/C) USPS Registered/Certified Postmarked USPS Priority Mail Delivery Confirmation™ or Signature Confirmation™ Label Postmarked USPS Express Mail I 1 Postmark Illegible No Postmark Shipping Date Overnight Delivery Service (Specify): Next Business Day Delivery Date of Receipt Received from House Records & Registration Office Date of Receipt Received from Senate Public Records Office Date of Receipt Received from Electronic Filing Office Date of Receipt or Postmarked Other (Specify): 4^ j/^v PREPARER DATE PREPARED (3/2005).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
    Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House).
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Recommendations Congressional Recommendations
    Page 6 October 2010 UTU News October 2010 UTU News Page 7 These candidates deserve your vote! Congressional Recommendations Congressional Recommendations Dist. 4 Henry Johnson (D)* Dist. 5 Emanuel Cleaver II (D)* Dist. 13 Betty Sutton (D)* Dist. 15 Ruben Hinojosa (D)* Alabama Colorado Maine New York Dist. 16 Silvestre Reyes (D)* House of Representatives Senate Dist. 5 John Lewis (D)* House of Representatives Dist. 7 Scott Eckersley (D) Senate Dist. 14 Steve C. LaTourette (R)* Michael Bennet (D)* Dist. 8 Jim Marshall (D)* Dist. 8 JoAnn Emerson (R)* Dist. 15 Mary Jo Kilroy (D)* Dist. 17 Chet Edwards (D)* Dist. 2 Bobby Bright (D)* Dist. 1 Chellie Pingree (D)* Charles E. Schumer (D)* Dist. 18 Sheila Jackson Lee (D)* Dist. 3 Steve Segrest (D) Dist. 12 John Barrow (D)* Dist. 2 Michael Michaud (D)* Kirsten E. Gillibrand (D)* Dist. 16 John Boccieri (D)* House of Representatives Dist. 13 David Scott (D)* Dist. 17 Timothy J. Ryan (D)* Dist. 20 Charles A. Gonzalez (D)* Dist. 5 Steve Raby (D) Dist. 1 Diana DeGette (D)* Dist. 23 Ciro D. Rodriguez (D)* Dist. 6 Spencer Bachus (R)* Maryland House of Representatives Dist. 18 Zack Space (D)* Dist. 2 Jared Polis (D)* Hawaii Dist. 1 Timothy H. Bishop (D)* Dist. 25 Lloyd Doggett (D)* Dist. 7 Terri A. Sewell (D)* Dist. 3 John Salazar (D)* Senate Dist. 27 Solomon P. Ortiz (D)* Senate Barbara Mikulski (D)* Dist. 2 Steve J. Israel (D)* Dist. 4 Betsy Markey (D)* Daniel Inouye (D)* Dist. 3 Peter T. King (R)* Dist. 28 Henry Cuellar (D)* Dist. 29 Gene Green (D)* Alaska Dist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of a Congressman by Jane Goldenberg After Gov
    In This Issue: Election Wrap-Up . .1 Election Wrap-Up . .4-5 SPECIAL ELECTION WRAP-UP INSIDE Dan Seals . .1 Media Machinations .6 Kirk on Local Issues .2 Photos from the 10th .7 No Surprises in Statewide Races Come Together . .2 Track Your Vote . .8 Taking Back the 10th .3 On the Moon . .8 Not one political The only other contested race in the Democratic observer expected primary was for State Treasurer. Alexander For information or to volunteer call: Governor Rod Giannoulias of Chicago won about 61 percent of 847.266.VOTE (8683) Blagojevich to lose his the vote over Knox County State’s Attorney Paul Or write to: bid for the Democratic Mangieri. Democratic State Chair Michael Lauren Beth Gash, Chair, Tenth Dems PO Box 523, Deerfield, IL 60015 nomination to Edwin Madigan backed Mangieri, but Giannoulias’ Visit the website: www.tenthdems.org Eisendrath and, with campaign was helped by the endorsement of Newsletter: [email protected] around 70 percent of the vote, it wasn’t close. U.S. Senator Barack Obama. Giannoulias faces a The Governor didn’t campaign much in the new challenge in November against Republican Editor John Hmurovic primary, but he is already on the campaign trail state Senator Christine Radogno of Lemont, who Editorial Staff for the November election, calling for an hopes to retain Republican control of the Editorial Staff: Lauren Beth Gash, Jane increase in the state minimum wage to $7.50 an Treasurer’s office which is now held by Topinka. Goldenberg, Paul Kelly, Leslie Lipschultz, Ross Nickow, Mark Paul, James Rosen, hour and asking his Republican opponent if she The other Democrats running statewide in the Ben Struhl, Ron Weiner.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Report Card
    2009-2010 CONSERVATION REPORT CARD Evaluating the 111th Congress efenders of Wildlife Action Fund Deducates the public about conservation issues and generates grassroots efforts to ensure that members of Congress and the president hear from constituents on pending legislation and regulations. Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund advocates in Washington, D.C., for legislation to safeguard wildlife and habitat and fights efforts to undermine conservation laws, such as the landmark Endangered Species Act. The Action Fund also publishes the Conservation Report Card to help citizens hold their legislators accountable by providing information on how lawmakers voted on important conservation issues. An online version of the Conservation Report Card, which contains detailed and updated information about key votes, is available at www.defendersactionfund.org Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization with a segregated Section 527 account. © 2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund 1130 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Photo: Hawksbill turtle © David Fleetham/naturepl.com FPOCert no. XXX-XXX-000 Printed on 100% post-consumer-waste, process-chlorine-free, recycled paper. he Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund’s 2009-2010 Conservation T Report Card measures the commitment of U.S. senators and representatives to wildlife and habitat conservation during the 111th Congress. It reviews six Senate votes and seven House votes on key conservation issues, providing a clear assessment of how well members of Congress are protecting wildlife and wild lands for future generations. The2009-2010 Conservation Report Card covers votes on important issues such as protecting polar bears, the world’s imperiled wild feline and canine species, and California sea otters; safeguarding wildlife and habitat in sensitive borderlands; addressing the impacts of climate change on wildlife; regulating greenhouse gas emissions; upholding the Endangered Species Act; and drilling for oil off our coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Essays
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Essays in American Political Behavior A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Robert Bond Committee in charge: Professor James Fowler, Chair Professor Charles Elkan Professor David Huber Professor Thad Kousser Professor Gary Jacobson 2013 Copyright Robert Bond, 2013 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Robert Bond is approved, and it is accept- able in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2013 iii DEDICATION My grandparents – Harry Bycroft, Betty Bycroft, Ronald Bond, and Lucy Stockton – did not live to see the completion of this dissertation. It is dedicated to their lives and their memory. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page . iii Dedication . iv Table of Contents . v List of Figures . vii List of Tables . x Acknowledgements . xii Vita and Publications . xiii Abstract of the Dissertation . xiv Chapter 1 Social Information and Participation . 1 1.1 Introduction . 2 1.2 Social norms and voting behavior . 4 1.3 Experimental Process and Results . 6 1.4 Discussion . 18 Chapter 2 The Dynamic Spread of Voting . 21 2.1 Introduction . 22 2.2 Peer effects and voting . 23 2.3 Data and methods . 24 2.4 Matching . 26 2.5 Calculation of Treatment Effect . 28 2.6 Results . 28 2.7 Discussion . 32 2.8 Conclusion . 33 Chapter 3 Estimating Ideology using Facebook’s ‘Like’ Data . 36 3.1 Introduction . 37 3.2 Facebook ‘Like’ Data . 39 3.3 Using Facebook data to scale ideological positions . 42 3.3.1 Model of liking .
    [Show full text]
  • January/February 2011 Tax Facts
    Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois 64 • 1 / January/February 2011 2010 LEGISLATIVE SYNOPSIS AND INSIDE THIS ISSUE ELECTION REVIEW Notes from the inside ............2 Election Review ..................13 By Scott Selinger Scott Selinger has been Legislative Director for the Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois since February 97th General Assembly Calendar .............................14 2010. With over ten years experience in the Illinois Legislature, he has previously served as Director of Government Relations at the Illinois Bankers Association, Legislative Liaison for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) and as an Issues Development Staff TFI 2011 Meetings ..............16 Member for Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan. As 2010 has come and gone, this edition of Tax Facts takes a look back at this past year’s legislative activity, including the January 2011 “lame duck” session, and also recaps some of the results from the November 2010 General Election. As always, TFI looks forward to providing you information on the pertinent Illinois fiscal issues and the proposed solutions FY 11’ BUDGET The Fiscal Year 2011 Budget reportedly included cuts totaling $1.4 billion, including $500 million in actual reductions from FY 10’ spending levels and another $900 million in so-called “efficiencies”. (See Agency Breakdown Link here): http://www.illinois.gov/publicincludes/statehome/gov/documents/ Historical%20Approp%20Master%20sheet2.pdf CONTACT US: 430 East Vine Street, Suite A The budget included the issuance of an Executive Order requiring state Springfield, IL 62703 V. 217.522.6818 agencies to cut spending on various operational costs, implement energy F. 217.522.6823 efficiency initiatives, and reduce group insurance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Congressional Battleground
    JanuaryJanuary 30,30, 20092009 January 30, 2009 State of the Congressional Battleground 40 Democratic-Held Seats JanuaryJanuary 30,30, 20092009 Tier 1: 20 most competitive Democratic-held congressional districts DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT 2008 CONG. 2006 CONG. 2004 PRES. STATE AND DISTRICT INCUMBENT SINCE MARGIN MARGIN MARGIN ALABAMA 02 Bobby Bright 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +39 Bush +34 ALABAMA 05 Parker Griffith 2008 Dem. +4 No Rep. Bush +20 COLORADO 04 Betsy Markey 2008 Dem. +12 Rep. +3 Bush +17 FLORIDA 08 Alan Grayson 2008 Dem. +4 Rep. +7 Bush +9 FLORIDA 24 Suzanne Kosmas 2008 Dem. +16 Rep. +16 Bush +10 GEORGIA 08 Jim Marshall 2002 Dem. +14 Dem. +1 Bush +22 IDAHO 01 Walt Minnick 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +5 Bush +38 ILLINOIS 14 Bill Foster 2008 Dem. +15 Rep. +20 Bush +12 MARYLAND 01 Frank Kratovil 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +38 Bush +26 MICHIGAN 07 Mark Schauer 2008 Dem. +2 Rep. +4 Bush +9 MISSISSIPPI 01 Travis Childers 2008 Dem. +11 Rep. +32 Bush +25 NEVADA 03 Dina Titus 2008 Dem. +5 Rep. +2 Bush +1 NEW MEXICO 02 Harry Teague 2008 Dem. +12 Rep. +19 Bush +16 NEW YORK 24 Mike Arcuri 2006 Dem. +4 Dem. +9 Bush +6 NEW YORK 29 Eric Massa 2008 Dem. +2 Rep. +3 Bush +14 OHIO 15 Mary Jo Kilroy 2008 Dem. +1 Rep. +0.5 Bush +1 PENNSYLVANIA 03 Kathy Dahlkemper 2008 Dem. +2 Rep. +12 Bush +6 TEXAS 17 Chet Edwards 1990 Dem. +7 Dem. +18 Bush +40 VIRGINIA 02 Glenn Nye 2008 Dem. +5 Rep. +3 Bush +16 VIRGINIA 05 Tom Perriello 2008 Dem.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Election Report Gubernatorial Election Suburban Cook County November 2, 2010
    POST-ELECTION REPORT Gubernatorial General Election Suburban Cook County November 2, 2010 Cook County Clerk David Orr Dear Friends: The November 2, 2010 Gubernatorial Election will be remembered for a spike in no-excuse mail-in absentee voting, a significant shift in partisan support, and some extremely close races. Due to the tight contest in the 8th Congressional District, the election ended two weeks after Election Day when all absentee and provisional ballots were tallied. If the popularity of absentee voting grows, this scenario could become more common with every election. This post-election report will give you a snapshot of political trends in the Cook County suburbs. Please mull over the results and analysis. For example: ¾ More than 25,000 mail-in absentee ballots were cast, or 3.5 percent of all ballots cast — 2.5 times the number of absentee ballots cast in the 2006 gubernatorial election. This is due to the change in state law that allows anyone to request an absentee ballot. ¾ Early Voting turnout was also up considerably over 2006. About 86,000 early voted in this election, more than 2.5 times the early turnout of 33,000 in 2006. ¾ Turnout reached 53 percent, up from 50 percent in 2006. ¾ Nearly 70 percent of voters in New Trier township participated — the highest turnout by a township for the third consecutive gubernatorial election. ¾ In the 2008 presidential election, only three townships voted a majority Republican for President, the top race on the ballot. This election that number grew to 15 — half of all townships — in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Review of Politics, Vol
    Fighting “Change” in Congressional Campaigns Randall E. Adkins and David A. Dulio The results of the 2008 election cycle were historic. After all of the votes were tallied, Senator Barack Obama garnered more votes than his principal opponent, Senator John McCain. Although the election brought the first African-American president to Washington, there is a lot more to the story. Congressional campaigns are often overshadowed by the presidential campaign and thereby left out of the post-election discussion. This is a mis- take. Campaigns for House and Senate seats are just as important to how the nation will move ahead on serious issues in the coming years. Congress, after all, is responsible for delivering to President Obama the legislation that makes up his agenda. In 2008 congressional Democrats increased their mar- gins in both the House and the Senate and returned the Democratic Party to unified control of government. The articles in this special issue of the Ameri- can Review of Politics examine six important congressional campaigns and help tell the story of the 2008 election, beyond Barack Obama’s historic victory. The National Political Setting Primary among the factors that made up the political landscape in 2008 was President George W. Bush. Indeed, his public approval rating of 25 per- cent in October of 2008 was near historic lows.1 In fact, President Nixon’s approval ratings were at 24 percent at the time he resigned from office due to the Watergate scandal.2 The public’s perception of President Bush created a highly advantageous context for most Democrats running for office and Republicans were effectively “on their heels” throughout the election cycle battling their challengers as best they could by dismissing President Bush and his unpopular policy choices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Latino Vote in America They Tipped Elections in 2008; Where Will They Be in 2010?
    The Power of the Latino Vote in America They Tipped Elections in 2008; Where Will they be in 2010? February 2010 LATINO VOTER TRENDS IN RECENT ELECTION CYCLES Over the past decade, Latino voters have steadily increased their political power, and made a decisive impact in races at all levels, including the Presidency. In 2010, Latino voters are poised to play a crucial role in key House and Senate races across the country. Many analysts have noted that as the Latino electorate grows in size and power, candidates from all political parties must take their views into account to remain viable in an increasing number of House and Senate races as well as future Presidential contests. While trending Democratic overall, at least one segment of the Latino electorate—foreign‐born, naturalized U.S. citizens of Latino descent, who represent 40% of the Latino voter population—has proven to be a true swing constituency. Candidates for political office in 2010, elected officials, and political strategists would be wise to not just look at how Latino voters are likely to vote this cycle, but why. This report lays out trends in Latino voting patterns over the last several years, and examines some of the factors that motivate and influence this segment of the electorate. The report features a list of “Races to Watch”—forty battleground House and Senate contests where Latino voters will play a key role—and details the Congressional districts where Latino voting power is most concentrated. The Latino Vote is Growing – In Size and Geographic Diversity For the past few election cycles, Latino voters have been making an impact at ballot boxes throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the Senate Cloture Vote on Federal Medical Assistance Percentage and Teacher Jobs Funding Legislation Remarks at Th
    Aug. 4 / Administration of Barack Obama, 2010 Because we know that real change does not you for joining us to honor these remarkable come from Washington, it comes from the people. None of them asked for this award. grassroots, from men and women in communi- They didn’t apply for it. Instead they were nom- ties all across the country working together to inated by the men and women all across the make a difference. country whose lives they have touched. And In the end, that’s what service is all about. It’s even though their names may not be well- not about the recognition or the awards—and known—at least not until today—[laughter]— it’s obviously not about the money. [Laughter] they are heroes to those who need it the most. To quote George Weiss, who’s being honored And together, they remind us that we all have here today: “We don’t do it for the notoriety. a purpose on this Earth that goes beyond our We do it because we felt it has to be done.” And own lives and our own individual needs. And that’s why it is my hope that if this award serves they teach us that no matter what challenges we a purpose, it will be to inspire more Americans face, we each have the power to make the world to open their hearts, to strengthen their com- a better place. So congratulations to all of you. munities, and to follow the example of these amazing men and women who are here today.
    [Show full text]