DOCSLIB.ORG

Renewable Energy Transition: Dynamic Systems Analysis, Policy Scenarios, and Trade-Offs for the State of Vermont Christopher Ernest Clement University of Vermont

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Renewable Energy Transition: Dynamic Systems Analysis, Policy Scenarios, and Trade-Offs for the State of Vermont Christopher Ernest Clement University of Vermont University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2016 Renewable Energy Transition: Dynamic Systems Analysis, Policy Scenarios, and Trade-offs for the State of Vermont Christopher Ernest Clement University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Natural Resource Economics Commons, and the Power and Energy Commons Recommended Citation Clement, Christopher Ernest, "Renewable Energy Transition: Dynamic Systems Analysis, Policy Scenarios, and Trade-offs for the State of Vermont" (2016). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 601. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/601 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RENEWABLE ENERGY TRANSITION: DYNAMIC SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, POLICY SCENARIOS, AND TRADE-OFFS FOR THE STATE OF VERMONT A Dissertation Presented by Christopher Ernest Clement to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Specializing in Natural Resources October, 2016 Defense Date: April 13, 2016 Dissertation Examination Committee: Jon D. Erickson, Ph.D., RSENR, Advisor Paul Hines, Ph.D., CEMS, Chair Asim Zia, Ph.D., CDAE Brian Voigt, Ph.D., RSENR Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College COPYRIGHT © Copyright by Christopher Ernest Clement October, 2016 ii ABSTRACT There is broad consensus that a transition to renewable energy and a low-carbon economy is crucial for future development and prosperity, yet there are differing perspectives on how such a transition should be achieved. The overarching goal of this dissertation, which is comprised of three interrelated studies, is to analyze and compare energy futures scenarios to achieve a renewable energy transition and low-carbon economy in the State of Vermont. In the first study, an analysis is presented of the role of energy pricing regimes and economic policy in the context of pursuing a renewable energy transition in the State of Vermont. Through the development and application of a system dynamics model, results address the limits to technological substitution due to path dependence on nonrenewable energy. The role of complementary economic policy is also highlighted to shift from a goal of quantitative growth to qualitative development in order to decouple economic welfare from energy consumption. In the second study, an analysis is presented of the impact of modeled energy transition scenarios to address energy development and land use trade-offs. Simulations with a spatio-temporal land cover change model find that Vermont could achieve a complete transition to renewable electricity using in-state resources through developing between 11,000 and 100,000 hectares of land for solar and wind, or up to four percent of state land area, including some environmentally sensitive land. This approach highlights the need for integration of energy policy and land use planning in order to mitigate potential energy-land use conflict. In the final study, trade-offs between energy, economic, environmental, and social dimensions of Vermont’s renewable energy transition are explored through the use of a multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy transition alternatives were designed to reveal trade-offs at the intersection of economic growth and carbon price policy. While there were no optimal pathways to achieving Vermont’s energy transition, some energy transition alternatives achieve a more socially desirable balance of benefits and consequences. Navigating the trade-offs inherent in the ongoing energy transition will require an adaptive approach to policymaking that incorporates iterative planning, experimentation, and learning. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation was only made possible by the loving, enthusiastic, and perseverant support I received from my family, friends, and, most of all, my wife, Danielle. I am also deeply grateful for the sage advice and generous aid lent to me by many smart, creative, fun, and hardworking colleagues. I would like to thank the valuable contributions of my advisor, Jon Erickson, and committee members, Asim Zia, Paul Hines, and Brian Voigt. I particularly want to call out Jon for taking a chance on this feisty aspiring Ph.D. student at the beginning of this adventure. I have been generously supported by a fellowship from the National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) program on Smart Grid: Technology, Human Behavior, and Policy. This fellowship enabled me to spend a summer working with a number of brilliant colleagues at Sandia National Laboratories, where I started to hatch my plans for my research. I have also benefited immeasurably from the vibrant community of kindred spirits at the University of Vermont Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, and my fellow comrades-in-arms in my IGERT fellowship program. I have had the fortune to also receive funding and assistance from the John Merck Fund through a grant coordinated by the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, as well as the Energy Action Network, Vermont Public Service Department, and many active participants in Vermont’s renewable energy transition. I want to dedicate my dissertation to my father, Ernest Clement, who many years ago nearly completed a Ph.D. of his own, and who maintained an unwavering faith in my ability to do so throughout the many ebbs and flows of my doctoral experience. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO ENERGY TRANSITIONS .................................... 1 1.1 A Historical Perspective on Energy Transitions ........................................... 2 1.2 Energy and the Economy ............................................................................ 10 1.3 Energy and the Environment ...................................................................... 14 1.4 Energy Transition Policy ............................................................................ 16 1.5 Setting the Stage for Vermont’s Energy Transition .................................... 25 1.6 The Challenge of a Renewable Energy Transition ..................................... 33 1.7 References ................................................................................................... 36 CHAPTER 2: MODELING THE RENEWABLE ENERGY TRANSITION ................. 47 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 48 2.2 Energy Transition Modeling ....................................................................... 50 2.2.1 Overview of Energy Transition Models ............................................... 50 2.2.2 The System Dynamics Approach to Energy System Modeling ............. 52 2.2.3 The Energy Futures Simulation ........................................................... 53 2.2.4 Strengths and Advantages of the EFS Modeling Approach ................. 57 2.3 Methods: EFS Modeling, Calibration, and Scenario Analysis ................... 61 2.3.1 Relationship between Economic Productivity and Energy .................. 62 2.3.2 Baseline Projections ............................................................................ 69 2.3.3 EFS Model Calibration ........................................................................ 72 iii 2.3.4 Scenario Modeling ............................................................................... 74 2.4 Scenario Modeling Results ......................................................................... 77 2.4.1 Renewable Grid Parity ........................................................................ 77 2.4.2 Peak Oil ............................................................................................... 80 2.4.3 Carbon Pollution Tax .......................................................................... 85 2.4.4 Scenario Comparison........................................................................... 87 2.5 Discussion ................................................................................................... 90 2.6 Conclusions ................................................................................................. 99 2.7 References ................................................................................................. 102 CHAPTER 3: THE ENERGY-LAND NEXUS ............................................................. 113 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 114 3.2 Study Area and Context ............................................................................ 118 3.3 Methods: Renewable Energy Development Modeling ............................. 122 3.3.1 An Overview of Spatio-Temporal Modeling with Dinamica EGO .... 122 3.3.2 LUCC Model of Future Renewable Energy Development ................. 124 3.3.3 Renewable Energy Development LUCC Model
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economics of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in South Asia Options and Costs
    Economics of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in South Asia Options and Costs Financed under ADB-Australia South Asia Development Partnership Facility Economics of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in South Asia Options and Costs Ram Manohar Shrestha Mahfuz Ahmed Suphachol Suphachalasai Rodel Lasco December 2012 Financed under ADB-Australia South Asia Development Partnership Facility © 2013 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. Published 2013. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9092-143-1 (Print), 978-92-9092-383-1 (PDF) Publication Stock No. BKK135371-2 Cataloging-in-Publication Data Shrestha, R.M., M. Ahmed, S. Suphachalasai, and R.D. Lasco. Economics of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in South Asia: Options and costs. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2013. 1. Climate change. 2. Mitigation. 3. South Asia. I. Asian Development Bank. the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ADB encourages printing or copying information exclusively for personal and noncommercial use with proper acknowledgment of ADB. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the express, written consent of ADB. Cover photos from ADB photo library and AFP Imageforum. Note: In this report, “$” refers to US dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Climate Compatible Development User-Orientated Analysis of Planning Tools and Methodologies Appendices to Analytical Report
    Guiding climate compatible development User-orientated analysis of planning tools and methodologies Appendices to analytical report Final report By: Ecofys and IDS Date: 20 September 2011 © PSTRDE102062 Ecofys and IDS 2011 by order of: CDKN This analytical report and an associated web-based user guide (www.climateplanning.org) has been prepared in response to demand from a range of practitioners and government officials in developing countries, including demand expressed through members of the Coordinated Low Emissions Assistance Network (CLEAN). As a member of CLEAN, the Climate and Development Knowledge Network funded and commissioned this work to help guide decision makers in developing countries to select appropriate tools and methodologies to support climate compatible development. This report was produced by Ecofys and IDS Ecofys: Markus Hagemann, Sarah Hendel-Blackford, Niklas Höhne IDS: Blane Harvey, Lars Otto Naess, Frauke Urban This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries. However, the views expressed and information contained in it are not necessarily those of or endorsed by DFID, which can accept no responsibility for such views or information or for any reliance placed on them. This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE Copyright Statement
    IEEE Copyright Statement: Copyright © [2006] IEEE. Reprinted from Proceedings of the 38th North American Power Symposium (NAPS), University of Illinois, Carbondale, IL, September 2006. This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of Carnegie Mellon University's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to [email protected]. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it. EN-TASK: Energy-Temporal and Structural Kit Marija D. Ilic, Fellow, IEEE energy needs and options, a National Energy Model System Abstract—This paper concerns a novel modeling and software (NEMS) was developed and has been in use as a means of framework in support of future electricity and energy services. A communicating energy issues to the high-level decision makers broad vision for one such possible framework named [1]. Energy-Temporal and Structural Kit (EN-TASK) is described. It The electric power systems tools used in control centers and is explained why is this needed, and how would such framework facilitate Dynamic Energy Control Protocols (DECPs) of the the NEMS have largely been complementary to each other. We future. The emphasis is on a framework which zooms in and out briefly summarize in Section II the inherent features of NEMS to assess potential of candidate technology and /or organizational and the electric power systems planning and operations tools change at the level where it matters the most.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Systems Modeling to Support Policy Making
    February 2014 KS-1401-WB01B Energy Systems Modeling to Support Policy Making Summary for policymakers In October 2013, KAPSARC convened a workshop result, there is now a plethora of different models in Washington, DC attended by some 30 that cater to the evolving needs of policy makers, international energy economic modeling and policy including optimization, equilibrium, and macro- experts. Discussions addressed the need to match econometric models. evolving policy imperatives with new and improved modeling approaches. Successful models to support policy interventions distinguish between: The main needs of energy system models over the the policy objectives or needs for the degree of past three decades trace a journey from an era in intervention necessary, which concerns about security and sufficiency of supply were the dominant themes (1970s and the measures and targets used to influence the 1980s), through a swing towards liberalizing decision making environment in the sector or markets, particularly North American natural gas economy, and and electric power (1980s and 1990s), to a growing the actions which address the policy objectives concern about climate change and greenhouse gas and meet the targets. emissions (2000s). In addition, there are now numerous countries with quickly developing As valuable as these models are in describing economies under central economic controls. Perhaps various scenarios, policy makers can, nonetheless, the future will require models that optimize the benefit from remembering that model outputs are not energy economies of such countries, developing forecasts so much as descriptions of what would under a centralized state capitalism model and happen if the representation of reality they describe administered prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Simulation of Energy Systems: a Review
    processes Review Modeling and Simulation of Energy Systems: A Review Avinash Shankar Rammohan Subramanian 1, Truls Gundersen 1 and Thomas Alan Adams II 2,* 1 Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Kolbjørn Hejes vei 1B, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (A.S.R.S.); [email protected] (T.G.) 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-905-525-9140 (ext. 24782) Received: 12 October 2018; Accepted: 18 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Energy is a key driver of the modern economy, therefore modeling and simulation of energy systems has received significant research attention. We review the major developments in this area and propose two ways to categorize the diverse contributions. The first categorization is according to the modeling approach, namely into computational, mathematical, and physical models. With this categorization, we highlight certain novel hybrid approaches that combine aspects of the different groups proposed. The second categorization is according to field namely Process Systems Engineering (PSE) and Energy Economics (EE). We use the following criteria to illustrate the differences: the nature of variables, theoretical underpinnings, level of technological aggregation, spatial and temporal scales, and model purposes. Traditionally, the Process Systems Engineering approach models the technological characteristics of the energy system endogenously. However, the energy system is situated in a broader economic context that includes several stakeholders both within the energy sector and in other economic sectors. Complex relationships and feedback effects exist between these stakeholders, which may have a significant impact on strategic, tactical, and operational decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Modeling of Intermittency in Wind Power Generation Alan Yung
    Economic Modeling of Intermittency in Wind Power Generation by Alan Yung Chen Cheng A.B., Engineering Sciences Modified with Environmental Policy – Dartmouth College, 2003 B.E., Environmental Engineering – Dartmouth Thayer School of Engineering, 2003 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2005 © 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author _____________________________________________________________________________ Engineering Systems Division and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 13, 2005 Certified by ___________________________________________________________________________________ Henry D. Jacoby Co-Director, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Professor, Sloan School of Management Thesis Supervisor Certified by ___________________________________________________________________________________ David H. Marks Morton and Claire Goulder Family Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering & Engineering Systems Director, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment Thesis Reader Accepted by ___________________________________________________________________________________ Andrew J. Whittle Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chairman, Departmental Committee for
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to LEDS for Policymakers
    EC-LEDS ENHANCING CAPACITY FOR LOW EMISSION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES Introduction to Low Emission Development Strategies for Policymakers in the Asia Region Course introduction This course is designed to equip policymakers and low emission development practitioners in the Asia region with an understanding of the LEDS process and its benefits. The course provides information on steps to design and implement climate resilient low emission development strategies and includes a compilation of tools and resources to assist countries in this process. This course also provides examples from countries around the world that are undergoing the formulation and implementation of their LEDS. This development of these materials is sponsored by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by the United States Government’s Enhancing Capacity for Low Emission Development Strategies (EC- LEDS) and USAID’s Low Emissions Asian Development (LEAD) programs. The information provided in these training materials is not official U.S. government information and does not represent the views or positions of the U.S. Agency for International Development or the U.S. Government. 2 Learning Objectives for This Course By the end of this course, you will be able to: • Explain the key concepts behind low emission development as a vehicle for promoting green growth and increased economic productivity; • Define low emission development strategies (LEDS) and explain their importance; • Identify and describe in detail all key elements of LEDS; and • Facilitate discussions on LEDS with policy makers from various ministries. 3 Course Navigation Please click the module of interest below to navigate to the corresponding portion of this presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information to 'Taking Stock of National Climate Policies To
    Supplementary Information to ‘Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement’ Roelfsema et al. 1 Contents Supplementary Figures ............................................................................................................................... 3 Supplementary Tables .............................................................................................................................. 10 1 Supplementary Note: Scenario protocol for the model comparison .............................................. 46 1.1 Country and region definitions ................................................................................................ 46 1.2 Climate policy database and selection of high impact climate policies .................................. 46 1.3 Nationally Determined Contributions ...................................................................................... 47 2 Supplementary Note: Kaya indicator framework and uncertainty ................................................. 48 2.1 Kaya indicator framework ........................................................................................................ 48 2.2 Uncertainty ............................................................................................................................... 49 3 Supplementary Note: Assessment of policy impact on GHG emissions in the context of other literature sources ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]