Tailor Made National SUMP Promotion Programs September 2019

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs

Deliverable No.: D6.4

Project Acronym: PROSPERITY

Full Title: Prosperity through innovation and promotion of Sustainable Urban Mobility

Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs : summary report and annexes

Grant Agreement No.: 690636

Workpackage/Measure No.: WP6

Workpackage/ Measure Title:

Communication, Dissemination and Exploitation

Responsible Author(s):

Zbyněk Sperat, CDV

Responsible Co-Author(s): Patrick Auwerx, M21

Date: 18/09/2019

Status: FINAL

Dissemination level: Public 1 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

About CIVITAS PROSPERITY Supporting local and national authorities to improve the quality and uptake of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans CIVITAS PROSPERITY is a 3-year project, started in September 2016 and supported by the European Commission within the H2020 programme. It aims to enable and create a culture shift in government agencies and local authorities to support Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs). The project focuses on promoting and supporting a broad take-up of SUMPs especially in countries / regions and cities where the take up is so far so low. It aims to achieve this through: providing mechanisms and tools for national / regional agencies to take a leading role in the development of SUMPs; building professional capacity through peer-to-peer exchange programmes and tailor made training programmes on various aspects of SUMPs and/or innovative approaches in sustainable urban mobility.

Contact: Robert PRESSL | Austrian Mobility Research FGM-AMOR | [email protected] www.sump-network.eu

CIVITAS PROSPERITY is a member of the European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans.

2 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Project Partners

Organisation Country Abbreviation Forschungsgesellschaft Mobilität Austrian Mobility Research AT FGM Edinburgh Napier University UK ENU Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia SI UIRS Cities on the Move RO CiMO Mobilissimus Ltd. HU Mobi Mobiel 21 BE M21 German Institute of Urban Affairs DE DIFU SMG EKSPERT PL SMG Sustainable Development Civil Society Assoc. BG CSDCS Environmental Centre for Administration and Technology LT ECAT Grupo de Estudios y Alternativas 21, S.L. ES GEA 21 Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes, I.P. PL IMT Centrum Dopravniho Vyzkumu v.v.i. CZ CDV Stratagem Energy Ltd CY STE City of Koprivnica HR Koprivnica TRT Trasporti e Territorio IT TRT City of Lisbon PT Lisbon City of Limassol CY Limassol Municipality of Jonava LT Jonova City of Kassel DE Kassel City of Dubrovnik HR Dubrovnik Municipality of Ljutomer SI Ljutomer Municipality of Hradec Kralove CZ Kralove Municipality of Fagaras RO Fagaras City of Katowice PL Katowice City of Varna BG Varna City of Szeged HU Szeged

3 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Document History

Date Person Action Status Diss. Level

16/08/2019 Zbyněk Sperat Document structure, first draft Draft EM

Update of information from 16/09/2019 Zbyněk Sperat Draft EM Sweden and Croatia

19/09/2019 Patrick Auwerx Review of D 6.4 Draft TC

20/09/2019 Tom Rye Final QA Final TC

Status: Draft, Final, Approved, and Submitted (to European Commission). Dissemination Level: PC = Project Coordinator, SC=Site Coordinator, TC=Technical Coordinator, MC = Management Committee, EM=Evaluation Manager.

4 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Table of Contents

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 7

2 INTRODUCTION ...... 8

3 NATIONAL SUMP PROMOTIONAL PROGRAMMES ...... 9

3.1 NATIONAL TASK FORCE ...... 9

3.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORKS ...... 11

3.3 COACHING EVENTS ...... 13

3.4 TRAINING EVENTS ...... 16

3.5 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 18

4 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 20

5 FINANCING ...... 22

6 SUMP PROMOTIONAL PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOMES ...... 24

7 CONTINUATION OF PROSPERITY ACTIVITIES ...... 28

8 ANNEXES: NATIONAL SUMP PROGRAMMES ...... 30 8.1 SUMP Promotion Programme Belgium ………………………………………………….31 8.2 SUMP Promotion Programme Bulgaria…………………………………………………..54 8.3 SUMP Promotion Programme Cyprus………………………………………. …………..78 8.4 SUMP Promotion Programme Czech Republic………………………………...... 100 8.5 SUMP Promotion Programme Germany………………………………………...... 120 8.6 SUMP Promotion Programme Spain ……………………………………………………142 8.7 SUMP Promotion Programme Croatia…………………………………………...... 162 8.8 SUMP Promotion Programme Hungary……………………………………………… 177 8.9 SUMP Promotion Programme Lithuania………………………………………...... 197 8.10 SUMP Promotion Programme Poland…………………………………………………..232 8.11 SUMP Promotion Programme Portugal…………………………………………………250 8.12 SUMP Promotion Programme Romania………………………………………………..275 8.13 SUMP Promotion Programme Sweden…………………………………………...... 311 8.14 SUMP Promotion Programme Slovenia………………………………………………...328

5 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

List of Figures Figure 1 Reported Task Force meetings ...... 10

List of Tables Table 1 National Task Force members and meetings in the project countries ...... 9 Table 2 Main agenda of NTF meetings ...... 11 Table 3 National SUMP networks ...... 12 Table 4 Coaching locations and attendance ...... 13 Table 5 Coaching topics ...... 15 Table 6 National Training Event Programme (regular training events only) ...... 17 Table 7 Overview of training events attendance ...... 18 Table 8 Dissemination activities ...... 19 Table 9 Overview of laws and regulations related to SUMP ...... 20 Table 10 Overview of financial resources for SUMP preparation and implementation ...... 22 Table 11 Country of Focus National/Regional SUMP Programme development 2016-2019 24 Table 12 Positive experience of NFPs; “What worked well” ...... 25 Table 13 Negative experience of NFPs; “What did not work well” ...... 26 Table 14 Continuation of PROSPERITY activities ...... 28

6 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

1 Executive Summary

This document summarises the communication, dissemination and exploitation activities of the PROSPERITY project which took place between 09/2016 and 08/2019. The activities were carried out by project countries – national focal points (NFPs) and project cities within work package (WP) 6: Communication, Dissemination and Exploitation. Beside that the document also summarises activities done under other WPs, primarily:  WP3: Policy and SUMP programmes; in sections Financing and Legislative framework  WP4: Capacity Building; in sections describing coaching and training activities  WP5: Monitoring, Evaluation and Quality Assurance; outputs are used in sections describing National Task Force (NTF) and main outcomes of the project National Task Force groups established during the PROSPERITY project in all project countries were found in most of the countries as one of essential elements which contributed to reaching objectives of WP6. NTF consists of representatives of responsible ministries and higher level of governments (HGL) and other partners active in SUMP topics. NFPs committed to continue the work of NTF even beyond the PROSPERITY project because the NTF concept seemed to be very successful. Task Forces were in most of countries steering the process of National SUMP Supporting Programme development, resp. in 11 of 14 countries the Preparation of National SUMP Programme was the main item at the agenda of NTF meetings. The SUMP Programmes are another important output of the project, this reports cites their outputs in chapters Legislative and Financing. Coaching events and training events were organised in 10 of 14 project countries that presented the main focus of PROSPERITY, i.e. those states where take-up of SUMP has been low. 179 cities and 334 persons were trained during multi-day training events. 30 coaching events were prepared in 10 project countries, the most popular topics were ‘Communication and Stakeholder Involvement’ and ‘Defining targets; Selecting measures and implementing measures in SUMP’. Although PROSPERITY came with many activities which were very successful and well appreciated by NFPs and project countries, e.g. concept of NTF and National SUMP Supporting Programmes discussed in detail in text below, there were also things which did not work regardless the effort of project partners. The barriers which limited impact of several PROSPERITY activities differs a lot from country to country, e.g. in CZ, SI, LT and HU the lack of capacities of stakeholders reduced the impact of PROSPERITY events.

7 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

2 Introduction Promotion of SUMPs at national level was one of the PROSPERITY objectives and a key activity for National Focal Points (NFPs) in project countries. In most of them the SUMP promotion started during previous ENDURANCE project which created national SUMP networks, and activated cities to start with SUMP. It has to be mentioned that two PROSPERITY countries, Cyprus and Croatia, did not take part in the ENDURANCE project. The SUMP Promotion Programme includes activities, progress and milestones of the NTFs, national meetings and training events (WP3 and WP4) and awareness raising activities. It also provides information on transfer of national frame conditions (legislation) and funding opportunities. This includes consideration of advantages and disadvantages of mandatory concepts/parts or directives. Data was collected through different ways: - online forms where NFPs filled in their activities in: o National SUMP promo events o National Task Force meetings o Third party events o National SUMP networks o NTF structure and its members o Dissemination actiivities - outputs of WP3 (Policy and SUMP programmes), particularly National SUMP supporting programmes; used in sections Financing and Legislative framework. - outputs of WP4 (Capacity building), particularly training events and coaching events - outputs of WP5 (Evaluation, monitoring and quality assurance), particularly results of M&E surveys and deliverable D5.3 Spain was in the PROSPERITY project represented by Catalonian region so information relating to Spain refers only to Catalonia.

8 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

3 National SUMP Promotional Programmes This chapter provides an overview of main achievements that make up the SUMP Promo Programme. A basic overview is given in the text, more detailed and country-related information is provided in Annexes of this report. 3.1 National Task Force The National Task Force (NTF) is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The NTFs were recommended to include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility.

National Task Force structure The structure of NTF and number of its members differs from country to country depending on different level of development of the SUMP framework at national/regional levels and setting of responsibilities. In general SUMP-responsible ministries were involved in nearly all national NTF groups. In the Czech Republic 5 ministries formed NTF (Ministries of Transport, Regional Development, Health, Environment and Education), 4 ministries formed NTF in Hungary (Ministries of Finance, Innovation and Technology, Interior and Agriculture), 3 federal ministries were part of NTF in Germany (Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure, Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety and Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community). In Poland Ministry of Infrastructure and Ministry of Investment and Economic Development were involved in NTF, In Slovenia Ministry of Infrastructure and Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning. In Belgium Departments of Transport of all 3 Belgian regions formed NTF while in Bulgaria NTF consisted preferably of stakeholders from Varna region and municipality, similar situation was in Spain, where only stakeholders from Catalonian region and Barcelona municipality were represented. In Cyprus NTF included 10 people working at the Ministry of Transport, Communications and Works, NTF was supplemented by 7 municipalities. In five countries of NTFs involved also associations of cities and cities’ networks (CZ, DE, LT, PT and RO). In Hungary, Jaspers – EBI, EC (DG Regio) and people representing Prime Minister´s office were members of NTF. The number of members are shown in the table below.

Table 1 National Task Force members and meetings in the project countries Total number of NTF No. of HGL representatives No. Country members (federal or regional levels) 1 BE 6 6 2 BG 10 2 3 CY 20 10 4 CZ 10 8

9 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Total number of NTF No. of HGL representatives No. Country members (federal or regional levels) 5 DE 19 6 6 ES 7 1 7 HR 9 1 8 HU 32 16 9 LT 9 1 10 PL 16 7 11 PT 8 1 12 RO 21 2 13 SE 10 5 14 SI 18 6

Task Force meetings Although it was thought that NTF would meet once a year so 3 meetings during the project would be sufficient, in many countries it became clear that more meetings were necessary, because creation of NTFs enabled their members to meet each other for the first time in SUMP affair. They became quickly motivated for the NTF work and requested more meetings.

No. of NTF meetings 8

0 SE CZ DE HU SI BG HR PL PT RO BE CY ES LT

Figure 1 Reported Task Force meetings

All project countries organised at least 3 NTF meetings, in SE 7 meetings took place, followed by CZ, DE and HU with 6 meetings. All together 62 meetings took place in PROSPERITY countries.

From the other side - the activation of the NTF and activation of the HGL were the most frequently cited Prosperity activities that provided the most influence in the countries of focus

10 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

to assist in the preparation of their National/regional SUMP Supporting Programmes (See D5.3).

Table 2 Main agenda of NTF meetings Main agenda of NTF meetings Countries

BG, CZ, DE, HR, HU, LT, Preparation of National SUMP Programme PL, PT, RO, SE, SI

Elaboration on quality assessment CZ, LT, SE, SI Elaboration on action plan level BG, PL, SI Preparation of the specifications for the SUMP tender BG Introduction of SUMP and Prosperity Project CY Learning needs and measures of SUMP Programme CY Stakeholder Involvement on SUMP CY Elaboration on legal conditions BG Inventory of national support for SUMPs in Germany DE Definition of SUMP and VEP in Germany DE National SUMP support programmes DE Identification of improvement areas ES Discussion on monitoring and evaluation scheme ES Discussion on methodological framework and ToR ES Elaboration on institutional conditions PL

Discussion of the main problems related to the preparation, RO promotion and implementation of the SUMPs in Romania

Identification of strong points and possible organisation and development of the SUMP national network RO

Preparation of National SUMP Programme was the topic mentioned in most of project countries – 11 of 14. Elaboration of quality assessment processes for SUMPs was the second most frequent point at the agenda – in 4 countries followed by Elaboration at the action plan level mentioned 3 times. Other themes were SUMP specific issues relevant for specific countries.

In many countries the National SUMP Supporting Programme was the main point on the agenda repeatedly as it was together with NTF formation one of the main outputs of the PROSPERITY project.

3.2 National SUMP networks By the term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparation and implementation of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National

11 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. which would ensure a minimum level of Network activities. These networks are expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation is needed. The build-up of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of the previous ENDURANCE project. The PROSPERITY project was not primarily focused on strengthening national SUMP networks, but it used the networks for its objectives, preferably for training events, dissemination activities and collecting the data. The PROSPERITY group of countries contained also Croatia and Cyprus which were not involved in the ENDURANCE project and where the situation regarding SUMP networks was unknown at the beginning of the project. For overarching the gap caused by absence in the forerunner project it was recommended to consider the possibility of joining already existing network which directly covers SUMP theme or at least deals with urban mobility. Table 3 provides basic information on national SUMP networks of all project countries.

Table 3 National SUMP networks No. of No. of activated cities members Other Country Name of the network at (Cities + institutions ENDURANCE Regions) website BEPOMM, the Belgian Platform on Mobility BE n/a1 n/a2 16 Management and sustainable mobility BG ENDURANCE Bulgaria 93 58 25 CY National SUMP Network 4 13 4 CIVINET Czech and Slovak CZ 16 6 18 Republics DE NaKoMo n/a3 17

1 Belgium: Regions have their own network of municipal/urban mobility professionals, the networks are run by the respective regional authorities, mainly by the Departments of Transport, Mobility and Public Works (names might differ in the respective Regions in BE). For total coverage ratio of L-SuMPs in Flanders, Brussels and Waloon region, see separate National SUMP programmes in WP3. 2 Belgium: Provinces, Associations of municipalities and cities, Energy Agencies, Regional bodies gathering Covent of Mayors local authorities, Other regional departments, PT operators, NGO’s, private professionals (consultancies) in some cases.

12 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

No. of No. of activated cities members Other Country Name of the network at (Cities + institutions ENDURANCE Regions) website ES (Catalonia 13 (whole Xarxa Mobal no formal membership4 only) Spain) Croatian national SUMP HR 10 3 3 network HU Magyar CIVINET 12 7 8 Darnaus Judumo Mieste LT 20 0 13 Planai POLAND SUMP Network PL 26 0 26 (Endurance) Rede Nacional para o PT Planeamento da Mobilidade 26 1 28 Sustentável SUMP National Network RO (Rețeaua Națională pentru n/a 8 22 PMUD) SE TRANA, Prosperity 16 12 13 Slovenska platforma za trajnostno mobilnost SI (SPTM) - Slovenian 63 147 78 Platform for Sustainable Mobility (SPSM) Detail information with names and contacts to host organisations and webpages is attached in the Annexes. 3.3 Coaching events Coaching was a tailor-made professional support for PROSPERITY Partner Cities for a smaller group of people, preferably Partner City representatives. Three coaching events took place in 9 project partner cities for 10 project countries. One of three coaching events in each country was joined to a four day long training event. Cities chose the coaching topics themselves according to their specific needs, tables below provide overview of coaching locations, attendance and topics. See details in D4.2.

Table 4 Coaching locations and attendance No. Country City No. of attendees 1 BG Varna 48 2 CY Limassol 40

3 Germany: For Germany, the "National Competence Network for Sustainable Urban Mobility" (NaKoMo) serves as a network for the broad field of sustainable mobility. The Difu, as NFP for Germany in the Prosperity project, contributed to the development of this network. NaKoMo was founded in April 2019 by the "Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure" (BMVI) and serves as a platform for all municipal issues relating to sustainable urban mobility 4 Spain - Catalonia: There is no formal membership to this network. It is open to all municipalities in the Barcelona Region, accounting for 311

13 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

No. Country City No. of attendees 3 CZ Hradec Kralove 46 Rovinj (Croatia and 4 HR 15 (Croatians) Slovenia joint events) 5 HU Szeged 30 6 LT Kaunas 30 7 PL Katowice 33 8 PT Lisbon 47 9 RO Brasov 23

Rovinj (Croatia and 10 SI 30 (Slovenians) Slovenia joint events)

Total 342

In total 342 people attended coaching events. In CY, CZ, SI more cities in some or all coaching events. The reason for invitation of other cities was to enable sharing the experience at city level.

14 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Table 5 Coaching topics Coaching topics Countries BG, CZ, HU, Communication and stakeholder involvement PL, RO Defining targets; Selecting measures and implementing measures in BG, CY, PL, SUMP RO Adopting the SUMP approach for small and mid-sized cities CY, RO How does SUMP mesh with statutory land use plans CZ, SI Monitoring and evaluation of SUMP BG Achieving political and internal buy-in CZ Expectations for the approval and implementation of the SUMP of CY Limassol SUMP objectives, measures, and the set of monitoring and evaluation HU indicators Sustainable Urban Logistic Plans HU Transforming the urban mobility with internal and external buy-in and LT ownership. Public transport. Promotion and planning public transport in the city and LT planning common e-ticket system with neighbouring city. Sustainable mobility measures and Jonava case LT Institutional cooperation in metropolitan areas / sharing responsibilities Pl between institutional players General SUMP notions (Concept; Cycle; First Steps) PT Analysis of Lisbon’s mobility situation PT Lisbon SUMP PT The organisation and implementation urban mobility campaigns & the involvement of various stakeholders for supporting urban mobility RO measures Parking management RO Street design RO SUMP implementation SI Land acquisition for infrastructure projects (e.g. cycling paths), public involvement and consultation techniques, funding sources for SI implementation of measures and conditions for acquisition of funds in relation to city size SUMP preparation process and parking HR SUMP tender preparation, SUMP's relation to other strategies and to HR short-term actions Good practice from other cities HR Communication and stakeholder involvement was the most requested theme of coaching events. It was in 5 cities on the agenda. The second highest request was for Defining targets; Selecting measures and implementing measures in SUMP which was coached in 4 cities. Topics Adopting the SUMP approach for small and mid-sized cities and How does SUMP

15 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

mesh with statutory land use plans were both coached in 2 cities. Other topics reflected city´s needs in their process of SUMP development and/or were tailor-made, e.g. Analysis of Lisbon’s mobility situation or Sustainable mobility measures and Jonava case.

3.4 Training events The PROSPERITY training programme was based on the user needs analysis carried out in Task 4.2 Identification of training needs in different countries. The analysis was carried out in conjunction with the CIVITAS SUMPS-Up project so that the both surveys provided complementary results to facilitate organising the training events in a coordinated way. Deliverable D4.1 Country / City Specific, Tailor-made Recommendation Documents on Training Needs summarises the assessment methodology and the outcome of the user needs analysis and provides recommendations for topic selection for training in each country. In each national training event and partner city coaching activity the training programme consisted of a combination of topics, trainers and an allocated Champion City. The combination of each element is based on the user needs analysis that has been drafted as a matrix matching countries, topics and trainers (from the expert pool of the PROSPERITY consortium). Four Champion Cities Vitoria-Gasteiz (ES), Dundee (UK), Sint-Niklaas (BE) and Vienna (AT) shared their experience during training events in host cities. Table below displays National Training Event Programme. For more information see D4.2.

16 / 29

D6.4– National SUMP Promotion Programmes - Summary Report September 2019

Table 6 National Training Event Programme (regular training events only)

D6.4– National SUMP Promotion Programmes - Summary Report September 2019

Table 7 Overview of training events attendance Regular training Extra training No. Country No. of cities No. of attendees No. of cities No. of attendees 1 BG 17 21 - 2 CY 4 14 3 CZ 9 27 8 18 4 HR 15 24 - 5 HU 10 26 10 17 6 LT 11 25 - 7 PL 19 25 18 23 8 PT 14 47 12 24 9 RO 19 28 - 10 SI 11 15 Total 131 252 48 82

Total Regular + Extra training 179 334 events

In four countries (CZ, HU, PL, PT) additional extra training events were organised. In total 179 cities and 334 city representatives (local politicians or municipal staff) attended the training events.

3.5 Other meetings and dissemination activities Beside training events and coaching events several types of other activities took place to promote SUMPs at national level: National meetings: - National SUMP Promo Events - annual national SUMP conference in own country (national training weeks are excluded). - Third-party Events - events with active participation (with own original content): presentation, leading a workshop, lecturing Dissemination: - Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project - Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Regular blogging – In terms of the PROSPERITY project a blog is represented as a dedicated section on the respective city website, on a respective national SUMP platform website, or on the CIVITAS PROSPERITY website. Regular blogging on own experience with the whole SUMP process (both, planning and implementation) by city representatives, experts and NFP in their own local language to encourage follower cities in the own country to become active.

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

- News and case studies - news and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website The table below provides overview of dissemination activities in all project countries. Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in national Annexes this report.

Table 8 Dissemination activities SUMP promo News events/ Exchange of Third Printed Digi Blog- and Country Experience party Media materials promo ging case No. of events Attendees studies events BE 3 282 5 4 4 4 1 0 BG 5 371 4 3 8 5 0 0 CY 5 70 9 5 1 4 0 0 CZ 3 185 6 2 2 4 1 0 DE 3 70 7 3 2 7 1 0 ES 4 800 5 1 1 2 1 2 HR 3 111 1 2 0 0 0 0 HU 3 129 8 0 1 9 1 0 LT 8 237 4 4 3 40 1 0 PL 3 215 0 1 1 5 1 0 PT 2 129 12 2 0 5 1 2 RO 5 240 23 2 3 4 0 0 SE 6 1050 4 1 0 4 0 1 SI 6 423 16 0 1 4 14 4 Total 59 4312 104 30 27 97 22 9

19 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

4 Legislative framework

National legislation is one of the crucial factors for the development of sustainable mobility policies in cities. Summary of legislative framework in project countries is described in Del 3.3 Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions which provides detail information in following paragraphs:  Summary from Endurance project report (2013)  Situation in 2017  Legislation, programmes and documents for urban mobility  Supporting or counteracting policies  Obligatory activities related to SUMPs  Need for improvement All PROSPERITY countries developed National Sump Supporting Programmes (NSSP) which will serve as a base for larger improvements on legislative elements and supporting policies. Some of these documents are undergoing a political acceptance steps (Romania, Portugal), other will be used as a foundation for development of further development steps (Hungary, Czech Republic) as Roadmaps. Changes which were a direct impact/result of project activities occurred in:  Germany (Renewal of the "National Climate Protection Initiative", and  Bulgaria (Ordinance to support SUMPs).

Table 9 Overview of laws and regulations related to SUMP

Country - region Situation in 2017 New elements in

Legislative Supporting Compulsory place in 2019 elements in policies elements in place place

Legislation, Adoption, Regional SUMP programmes, implementation, legislation Belgium - Flanders 4 Several documents and monitoring and funds evaluation, updates

Adoption, No data provided Belgium - Brussels 4 Legislation Several implementation

Legislation and No new elements Spain - Catalonia 4 Several Several programmes

Legislation and No data provided Belgium - Walloon 3 Several Adoption only funds

Some, some No data provided Sweden 3 Not specified Several recommended

20 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Country - region Situation in 2017 New elements in place in 2019 Legislative Supporting Compulsory elements in policies elements in place place

Legislation, No new elements Lithuania 3 programmes Several Some and documents

Programmes No new elements Slovenia 3 Several Some and documents

Legislation and Some, some No new elements Romania 2 Some programmes recommended

Renewal of the Legislation and None, some Germany 2 Several "National Climate programmes recommended Protection Initiative"

Legislation, No new elements Hungary 2 programmes Some None and funds

Legislation and No new elements Poland 2 Several None documents

Ordinance to support Some on SUMPs which remain national level, Bulgaria 2 None stated None non-obligatory, some more on city activities on regional level level

Programmes None, some No new elements Czech Republic 2 Some and documents recommended

Programmes No new elements Portugal 1 Some None and documents

Programmes No new elements Cyprus 1 None None only

Croatia 1 Documents only Some None No new elements

Legend:

4 – Several elements of legislation in place, several compulsory elements in place;

3 – Several elements of legislation in place, some compulsory elements in place;

2 – Some legislation or programmes related to SUMPs, no compulsory elements in place;

1 – No legislation and programmes related to SUMPS, no compulsory elements in place)

21 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

5 Financing

A summary of financial resources for SUMP preparation and implementation in project countries is described in Del 3.3 Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions which provides detail information in following paragraphs:  Summary from Endurance project report (2013)  Situation in 2017  Availability of resources for SUMP  Existence of minimal standards for SUMP  Need for improvement Financial resources for SUMP preparation and implementation in 2019 are summarized in Table 6.

Table 10 Overview of financial resources for SUMP preparation and implementation

Country - region Situation in 2017 New elements in place in 2019 Existing financial resources for SUMP Implementation funding L R N EU conditioned to SUMP adoption

Belgium - Brussels 3 yes Yes Partly Partly

Belgium - Flanders 3 yes Yes Partly Partly

Belgium - Walloon 3 yes Yes Partly no

Germany 3 yes Yes Partly no

Slovenia 3 yes yes yes Yes no

Lithuania 3 yes yes Yes no

Spain - Catalonia 2-3 yes Yes No Partly

Portugal 2 yes some yes Partly no

Hungary 2 yes yes Partly no

Croatia 2 some yes Partly no

Romania 2 yes some yes No Partly

22 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Country - region Situation in 2017 New elements in place in 2019 Existing financial resources for SUMP Implementation funding L R N EU conditioned to SUMP adoption

No data Sweden 2 yes Some No provided

Bulgaria 2 some some yes No Partly

Cyprus 2 some yes No no

Czech Republic 1-2 some yes Partly Partly

Poland 1-2 yes yes No no

(legend: 1 – no funding (besides EU) available; 2 – some funding available, unsystematic; 3 – funding on several levels, systematic to some extent; 4 – funding on several levels, systematic; L – local level; R – regional level, N – national level, EU – European level) There are some minor changes in financial resources between 2017 and 2019, but generally at the EU level and occasionally at local level. The situation of funding conditioned to SUMP adoption is the same as in 2017. PROSPERITY helped to increase understanding and awareness regarding the role of the SUMPs, therefore it is expected that new funding will be available because of it.

23 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

6 SUMP Promotional Programme main outcomes Several promotional activities reported in this document were done in 3 years duration of the project. The following section presents results and main achievements of SUMP promo activities in PROSPERITY countries and feedback given by NFPs. Its data source is D5.3 Final Monitoring and Evaluation Report and D6.4 SUMP Promotion Programmes of each of project countries. Beside dissemination, national promo events, training events and coaching events two core outputs which had and will have the main impact on SUMP progress in project countries can be identified: - National SUMP Supporting Programmes - Activation of National Task Forces

National SUMP Supporting Programmes The change to and development of the respective National SUMP Programmes is illustrated in table below.

Table 11 Country of Focus National/Regional SUMP Programme development 2016-2019

Before After Existing Update No National New (no National Renew existing SUMP Road Map previous Country of SUMP existing (additional Programme programme) Focus Programme elements) Flanders Walloon Brussels Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Rep. Germany Hungary Lithuania Poland Portugal Romania Slovenia Spain Sweden 2016 2019 Total 10 6 3 3 2 8

24 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

The figure above demonstrates the levels of change and progress achieved during the project timeframe. At the project commencement only 4 of the counties of focus had an existing SUMP programme – BE (the Walloon, Flanders and Brussels), PT, SI, ES. By the end of the project, 8 of the 10 countries of focus that started from the scratch have produced a new National SUMP Supporting Programme and remaining 2 produced a Road Map. Three of countries that had existing SUMP Programmes before updated their existing programmes and included new elements to improve on the previous versions.

Activation of National Task Forces

The activation of the NTF (and activation of the HGL) were the most frequently cites Prosperity activities that provided the most influence in the countries of focus to assist in the prepare their National/regional SUMP Supporting Programmes. Following table presents good experience on PROSPERITY activities provided by NFPs. NFPs were asked what worked well during the project lifetime. Activation and operation of NTF was mentioned nearly in all answers. NFP´s complete answers can be found in the Annexes.

Table 12 Positive experience of NFPs; “What worked well” The Task Force gave mainly inspiration for self-assessment and improvement of the own regional programmes Flanders: Thanks to (Endurance) and Prosperity we could realise that Flanders should no longer be ‘humble’. The awareness (thanks to the benchmark research of WP3) that Flanders is leading made us spread this good news more publicly among stakeholders and towards the leading administrative responsible persons. BE Walloon: Prosperity realised good contacts between NFP and SPW (Walloon Administration and its higher level representatives). Brussels Region: The Good Move Regional Mobility Plan as finally approved in 2019, after a long and intensive public consultation/participatory trajectory, has high ambitions to fulfill, but there is political will as leverage factor. Also, Brussels is coming more and more aware that it should become a good example of urban mobility, being the head center of European Institutions. The NTF was in fact a Regional NTF because the ministerial representatives participated only as observers. The cooperation between the NTF and the Varna BG Regional Authority worked very well. The manner of urban planning in Varna was changed. NTF was active and all participating ministries were willing to find strategies and measures for improvement the mobility situation in Cypriot cities. Also there was a CY well exchange of experience on how the national context is perceived at a city level and how the national level could further help cities in SUMP development. NTF was active and all participating ministries were willing to find strategies and CZ measures for improvement the mobility situation in Czech cities. They all were active in SUMP Programme elaboration. Difu organised National Events for the promotion of SUMPs, where different stakeholdes and employees of cities could learn important aspects about the SUM DE planning process. The NTF in Germany can strongly influence the further processes regarding sustainable mobility planning in Germany. Formalization of NTF, as well as setting a clear goal and time-frame for the NTF ES (updating the SUMP support programme within PROSPERITY) helped achieve the goal. The creation of working groups linked to the NTF was of great help.

25 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

Increased interest of local communities in sustainable urban mobility planning. Also, the focus on transport professionals that should carry the activities of promoting HR sustainable mobility in cities and encouraging them to start with these kinds of activities was very important. NTF was active and all participating ministries were willing to find ways to promote SUMP and measures for improvement the mobility situation in Hungarian cities. They HU ideas have been involved in the draft National SUMP programme during the co- creation process. Training and exchange within the project has substantially helped the staff of the LT Ministry of Transport to become more confident and in some areas, more capable. Thanks to early contacts between NFP and ministry, the Task Force was constituted without major issues. During the lifetime of the project, ministries gained more PL awareness and knowledge about SUMP. The representative of ministry was constantly engaged in the project workflow, including participation in the international exchange workshops The collaboration between the NFP and the other members of the NTF, providing a joint organization of almost all events promoted during the CIVITAS PROSPERITY PT project. The training sessions registered a high participation from cities and the training evaluations were very good. The training and coaching sessions, webinars and experience exchanges. The NTF proved to be very successful. It gathers various profiles and points of view and RO helped to create a comprehensive picture of the actual situation and improvement possibilities. NTF was doing very well and created a common perspective about what must be SE done. NTF was most important contribution from the project. With the NTF we’ve broaden SI the group of people dealing with the national programme, opened the discussion and had regular interchange based on the frequent meetings. The consistently positive and constructive comments regarding the structure and performance of the NTF illustrates that ability of the PROSPERITY project to get ministries and national agencies to play a national leading role on SUMPs and to provide an effective mechanism for ministries to take a lead role which has contributed to achieving the project objectives.

Negative experience from NFP perspective Although PROSPERITY came with many activities which were very successful and well appreciated by NFPs and project countries, e.g. concept of NTF and National SUMP Supporting Programmes mentioned above, there were also things which did not work well regardless the effort of project partners. To realize these barriers which negatively influence the SUMP development at national levels is valuable and can help to plan future steps in SUMP promotion. Table below shows NFP´s answers to the question “What did not work well”.

Table 13 Negative experience of NFPs; “What did not work well” Walloon: There are more Prosperity external factors that influence whether or not BE SUMP policy will be improved. Cultural (and social-economic) differences sometimes remain a barrier for further cooperation. The Bulgarian team did not achieve to persuade the ministries to take over the BG SUMP framework. They didn’t change their position that the SUMP is a municipal

26 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

task and the state level should not provide any framework for SUMP development and implementation In Cyprus it is difficult to change the mentality of stakeholders and sometimes hard to CY convince them about positive effects of SUMP. Cities involvement in events organised within the project was not as high as was CZ thought at the project start. Municipal staff and local politicians are overloaded by work which was the reason for their lower attendance. The issue of Verkehrsentwicklungspläne (VEP) or Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMP) is still a topic for medium or big size cities in Germany. Despite the attempt DE to provide an appropriate agenda for small cities at the second annual national conference, it was hard to activate smaller municipalities. The lack of personnel and financial resources are main reasons for it. The fact that coordination between affected parties already existed before PROSPERITY (although based on non-formalised structures, whose main mechanism is the closeness and daily contact between the technicians responsible ES for each competent administration) made it difficult to “sell” the idea of the National Task Force meeting, which was initially perceived as unnecessary by some potential participants. HR The Ministry did not participate/take a leading role Municipal experts have very limited capacities to participate such events. Moreover, HU the decision-makers do no always support them. Less new cities were engaged during the project, however, the ones got engaged are really devoted. Cities involvement in events organised within the project was not as high as was thought at the project start. It was expected more politicians or high level municipal LT administration representatives. Unfortunately, municipal administration and local politicians are overloaded by work which was the reason for their lower attendance. There were no major barriers, only some related to availability of certain NTF PL members for meetings attendance and continuous work on tasks. The ministry delegated its NTF participation on the NFP. The focus of the ministry at PT the start of the Prosperity project were strategic documents that were started in before the start of the Prosperity project and that were focused on regional planning. The main weakness of the NTF is given by the fact that it has not allocated a RO dedicated funding (fact making difficult the face to face meetings as well as its promotion). SE There is always a lack of time/money. The lack of capacities of main players in the NTF (Ministry of Infrastructure, UIRS SI and others) to respond to the increased demand for the support and development of SUMPs in the country. The barriers which limited impact of (several) PROSPERITY activities differs a lot from country to country. In CZ, SI, LT and HU the lack of capacities of stakeholders reduced the impact of PROSPERITY events. This was the most frequently mentioned complaint. In some countries it is still needed to inform about SUMP benefits, because some stakeholders do not see the positive effect of it (CY), or SUMP topic is not the priority for ministries (BG, PT).

27 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

7 Continuation of PROSPERITY activities The PROSPERITY project came with many activities which were very successful and well appreciated by project countries, e.g. concept of NTF and National SUMP supporting programmes. The ambition of the PROSPERITY was to start continuous process of SUMP support which will endure beyond PROSPERITY period and where regular meetings of NTFs and regular updates of National SUMP Supporting Programmes will play a main role. Table provides a summary of NFPs assumptions how SUMP promotion will continue.

Table 14 Continuation of PROSPERITY activities The BEPOMM network & steering board (NTF) remains active and will follow up on SUM policies. The scattered competences of the Regions however brings the NFP is BE a ‘delicate’ positions, not being able to influence fully (because Regional Ministries and Authorities finally decide). The promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project with the elaboration and implementation of the Varna SUMP. The promotional BG activities are planned in the Regional SUMP Programme and the members of the NTF are willing to continue working regardless the end of the project. Promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project, CY promotion activities are planned in SUMP Programme, all members of NTF are willing to continue to work regardless the end of the project. Promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project, CZ promotion activities are planned in SUMP Programme, all members of NTF are willing to continue to work regardless the end of the project. Even after the end of the Prosperity project the NTF will keep on meeting. The Difu, as the NFP within Prosperity, will organise the meetings. Further meetings of the DE NTF are important to further the process of support for SUMP and all the participating members of the NTF agree on this point. From a National perspective, DIBA is willing to maintain the NTF approach through the creation (in the medium/long term) of a "Mobility Forum” for Barcelona, in which the administrations with competences in mobility in Barcelona region periodically meet to discuss aspects such as: ES • Defining/updating of methodological approaches • New support needs for municipalities • Future challenges for mobility • Others The best way to continue the development/implementation of the SUM program is to connect all the interested stakeholders in this process, from the government level to HR the business sector, in order to develop a critical mass of stakeholders that is needed for the successful implementation of the program. Promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project, HU promotion activities are planned in SUMP Programme, all members of NTF are willing to continue to work regardless the end of the project. Key factors for the continuation of the SUMP Programme: - Regular meetings of National SUMP Commission (NTF will be integrated in it) with LT Ministry of Transport - Promotion of EU and other international events on sustainable transport and LT mobility to our cities / PROSPERITY network members - Continued thematic workshops on the nine themes that make up the SUMP guidelines in LT - Cooperation on national campaigns for road safety

28 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

The continuation of the SUMP Promo Programme in Poland will take place within the framework of further meetings of the working group officially established by the PL Ministry. The established working group will deal with detailed development and implementation of the solutions described in the SUMP Programme, which were not implemented within the time horizon of the Prosperity project. If the National SUMP Programme Proposal is approved, the National Task Force members will be invited to form the Programme Task Force (PTF) that will coordinate PT the implementation of the Programme throughout its validity (2019-2024). The PTF intends to hold Programme Coordination meetings twice a year. There is a need of maintenance of the NTF as an urban mobility exchange platform and advising body enabling the communication between the various governance RO levels and sectors for the optimization of the effectiveness of SUMPs as operational tools. The Swedish Transport Administration will work with as many as possible of the SE proposed tasks in the National progamme. Sweden will also connect other projects, such as Park4SUMP, to the ongoing work with SUMPs/Traffic strategies. We’ll continue with NTF´s work after the project with even more intensive work and SI we managed to secure resources for it in a different project. This shows the importance and success of the NTF in Slovenia.

Through NFPs all project countries stated that promotion of SUMPs will continue beyond PROSPERITY project and NTFs will continue their work. The real power of NFP and its influence on HGL, resp. the position of NFP in NTF and in a structure of national SUMP stakeholder´s is a crucial factor whether and how much this continuation will be effective.

29 / 29

D6.4 : Tailor made national SUMP promotion programs September 2019

8 Annexes: national SUMP programmes

Note: The Annexes have a separate page numbering.

8.1 SUMP Promotion Programme Belgium ………………………………………….31 8.2 SUMP Promotion Programme Bulgaria…………………………………………..54 8.3 SUMP Promotion Programme Cyprus………………………………………. …..78 8.4 SUMP Promotion Programme Czech Republic………………………………...100 8.5 SUMP Promotion Programme Germany………………………………………...120 8.6 SUMP Promotion Programme Spain …………………………………………….142 8.7 SUMP Promotion Programme Croatia…………………………………………...162 8.8 SUMP Promotion Programme Hungary………………………………………….177 8.9 SUMP Promotion Programme Lithuania………………………………………....197 8.10 SUMP Promotion Programme Poland……………………………………………232 8.11 SUMP Promotion Programme Portugal…………………………………………..250 8.12 SUMP Promotion Programme Romania………………………………………….275 8.13 SUMP Promotion Programme Sweden…………………………………………...311 8.14 SUMP Promotion Programme Slovenia…………………………………………..328

30 / 29 w

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Belgium

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk SPERAT | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Patrick Auwerx | Mobiel21

Date: June 2019

Status: Final

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 33

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 33

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 33

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 35

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 37

2.4 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 38

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 38

4 FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND OTHER INCENTIVES ...... 40

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 42

APPENDIX ...... 45

1 Introduction Promotion of SUMPs at national level is one of PROSPERITY objectives and a key activity for National Focal Points (NFPs) in project countries. In most of them the promotion has started during previous ENDURANCE project which created national SUMP networks, and activated cities to start with SUMP. The SUMP promotion programme includes activities, progress and milestones of the Task Force, national meetings and trainings (WP3 and WP4) and awareness raising activities. It also provides information on transfer of national frame conditions and financing and funding opportunities. This includes consideration of advantages and disadvantages of mandatory concepts/parts or directives.

2 SUMP Promo Programme main achievements This chapter provides an overview of main achievements that make up the SUMP Promo Programme. A basic overview is given in the text, more detailed information is provided in Appendix of this report.

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (1) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (2) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (3) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (4) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of

high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Kimberley Flemish Department Transport Ass. Director [email protected] Vandamme MOW Policy anderen.be Flemish Department Transport Head SUMP [email protected] Dominique Ameele MOW Policy nderen.be Mobility [email protected] Sofie Walschap BCR Department of Transport Management Bruno Vanlooveren BRC Department of Transport SUMP Devision [email protected] Didier.castagne@spw- Didier Castagne SWP Department of Transport SUMP Policy wallonie.be SUMP & MM Alice Gobiet SPW Department of Transport policy [email protected]

Task Force meetings As described in WP 3; analysis of national SUMP programmes, one should be aware that the 3 Regions in Belgium – that all have competence over and support L-SUMPs with guidelines, institutional, financial and organisational legislation (based on Decree or Ordonance) It is based on the Flanders experience in the Mid 90’ies that Task Forces were established to develop these support programmes. Meanwhile the Walloon Region and Brussels Capital region Mobility Departments have similar ‘high level steering bodies’ that watch over progress and improvements. After 2 first National Task Forces the 3 Regions agreed to concentrate on the respective updates of their Regional SUMP programmes individually, and have only contact with the NFP via telco’s on the basis of specific (support) needs. Nevertheless, the responsible Ministry persons meet each other in the intergovernmental working group and once a year during the EPOMM general assembly in Brussels. In all regions the Task Force work gave mainly inspiration for self-assessment and improvement of the own regional programmes. The outcomes and state of play of updates concerning the respective Regional SUMP Programmes for Flanders, Brussels Capital City and Walloon Region can be read in the WP3 deliverable 3.4 about the SUMP national/regional supporting programmes

More information can be found in Appendix. 2.2 National SUMP network The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network BEPOMM, the Belgian Platform on Mobility Management and sustainable mobility Host of the Web address Contact E-mail address Tel. number network of the network name Mobiel 21 Patrick [email protected] 0032 16 Auwerx 317708 Membership Cities/regions Other institutions Regions have their own network of municipal/urban Provinces, Associations of municipalities and mobility professionals, the networks are runned by cities, Engery Agencies, Regional bodies the respective regional authorities, mainly by the gathering Covent of Mayors local authorities, Departments of Transport, Mobility and Public Other regional departments, PT operators, Works (names might differ in the respective NGO’s, private professionals (consultancies) in Regions in BE) some cases.

The Belgian SUMP Network is organised via BEPOMM. The Belgian Platform exists already 6 years as a result of EPOMM-Plus and was broadened to Mobility Management and SUMP network since 2014.

The network can rely on a contact database of + 260 active people (professionals and supporters that regularly come to the organised network events) Half of them are locally based (municipalities and cities).

2.3 Cities and their activation Interest of cities in SUMP and their involvement into the project is the key success factor. Specific tool for cities activation was developed in the Endurance project and is described in Roadmaps of the Endurance project (http://www.epomm.eu/endurance/index.php?id=2833, http://www.epomm.eu/docs/2250/D3_4_ENDURANCE_Report.pdf). A modified diagram below offers the guidance for categorisation of cities (interested/uninterested in SUMP and advanced/less advanced in SUMP). interested in interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement 1 2

Main target group: authorities with a low score on the Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but interested in network. SUMP continuum and interested in network. Task: convince them to commit to SUMP; invite them Task: invite them to PROSPERITY activities. to PROSPERITY activities. Contact strategy: e-mail, newsletters Contact strategy: phone calls, approach on national network events, personal visits, customised offer

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

In Belgium, most of the small and medium sized cities are active BEPOMM members with 16 SUMPs actual information online via the Endurance website, including Brussels Capital (in fact 19 municipalities and cities) Belgium has a total of 510 approved L-SuMPs. ( Flanders and Brussels have 100%, Walloon region 70 % coverage ratio). Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website:

37 http://www.epomm.eu/endurance 2.4 Other meetings and dissemination activities Several types of other activities took place to promote SUMPs at national level: Meetings: - National SUMP Promo Events - annual national SUMP conference in own country (national training weeks are excluded). - Third-party Events - events with active participation (with own original content): presentation, leading a workshop, lecturing Dissemination: - Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project - Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Regular blogging – In terms of the PROSPERITY project a blog is represented as a dedicated section on the respective city website, on a respective national SUMP platform website, or on the CIVITAS PROSPERITY website. Regular blogging on own experience with the whole SUMP process (both, planning and implementation) by city representatives, experts and NFP in their own local language to encourage follower cities in the own country to become active. - News and case studies - news and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework

This chapter is made up of extracts from the SUMP Programmes of Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels-Capital Regions.

Flanders Region

After almost 20 years of ‘leading’ good practise in local SUMP (L-SUMP) support, the northern region in Belgium – Flanders - has chosen a new approach: (basic) accessibility, multimodality in logistics and passenger transport , layered transport networks & nodes combined with MaaS will become the bone of Regional SUMPs. In the 15 transport regions several cities and municipalities in the same spatial influence area will cooperate on planning, implementing and evaluating a more user-oriented sustainable mobility policy.

The new ‘Decree’ on Regional SUMPs should be seen in the context of the change towards a more ‘holistic’ sustainable mobility policy.

 On the 18th of December 2015, the Flemish Government approved the concept memorandum "With basic accessibility towards an efficient and attractive transport model in Flanders that optimally meets the requirements” (VR 2015 1812 DOC.1446). With this decision the concept of basic accessibility was further specified.  In the concept memorandum "State of the art Basic accessibility" approved by the Flemish Government on October, 2017 (VR 2017 2710 DOC 1072) it is proposed to draw up a transport plan that is broader than just the aspects public transport and customized/on demand transport.  In 2016 three pilot Transport Region projects were introduced and evaluated. A fourth project following in 2017 in the Transport Region of Antwerp. The remaining Transport Regions started in the latter part of 2018 or will shortly commence in 2019. The evidence from these pilot projects provided advancing insights for modifications in the new Decree. The Decree has evolved into a 25-page long policy document and a more comprehensive 70-page ‘Memorandum’ was also drafted to provide further guidance and explanation. The documents were approved by the Flemish government on 21st of December 2018. Consultation with the CIVITAS Prosperity Belgian National Task Force took place to follow up on the incremental changes. First step workshops, with the Flemish quality chamber, were held to assess possible improvements. The CIVITAS Prosperity National Focal Point was also included in the final consultation process of a broad expert stakeholder sound board. This Sound Board is refining and detailing the new guidelines before the Flemish Parliament finally adopted the new Decree late Spring 2019. This new regulatory framework sets the Flanders region apart from other countries as a forerunner once more by moving the design of its future mobility from the local level to a functional city approach. 2019 will be an important year of ‘change’ with the first Regional SUMPs expected to be ready by 2020.

Wallonia Region

All decrees related to mobility will be reviewed gradually to be incorporated in the new Mobility Code. The legal basis of the SUMP guidelines is the Decree on mobility and local accessibility (2004). In addition, there is a separate legislation on the financing of urban mobility plans (2004). City councils must adopt an L-SuMP (PCM). In the case of a SUMP (PUM), most City councils (representing 2/3 of the population of urban area) have to adopt the PUM (with a final approval by the Walloon government). The other planning levels, such as the SAMs, provincial mobility plans and cross-border mobility plans have no mandatory legal status (by any decree) and are voluntary.

Brussels-Capital Region

After two generations of regional SUMPs, changes in the region and the increasing importance of the mobility policy created the need today for a more proactive approach than the approach initiated with the first two generations of regional SUMPs (called “Iris” plans). To make regional

39 and municipal mobility strategies and projects more consistent with one another, the Brussels- Capital Region approved an Ordinance on 26th July 2013 giving regulatory status to its new Regional SUMP. The ordinance of 2013 also defines the content of the regional and local SUMPS and specifies that all L-SUMPS need to be in line with the legislative parts of the regional SUMP. In addition, non-legislative parts of the regional SUMP need to be taken into account in the L-SUMP. Finally, the ordinance specifies that L-SUMPS will be updated every twelve years and that the regional SUMP is updated every ten years. The regional SUMP is part of the indicative strategic plans that are binding for all administrative entities that depend on the Region, such as the Regional Sustainable Development Plan (GPDO), the Noise Plan and the Air-Climate Energy Plan. Various legislation provides a framework for aspects of the mobility policy or the resulting actions: The Brussel’s spatial planning legislation forms the legal basis for the plans and resources for the implementation of the spatial planning organisation policy:  The Regional Zoning Plan (GBP) is at the same level as the regional SUMP; these must be consistent with each other;  In the Guidelines for Construction (RPA), the regulatory provisions of the others plans that conflict with it have been withdrawn;  The Regional Urban Planning Regulation.

The Brussel's Legislation of Air, Climate and Energy Management controls the plans and resources for the implementation of the policies for air quality, climate and energy. The Parking Ordinance provides the framework for the Regional Parking Policy Plan (GPBP) and the Municipal Parking Action Plans (GPAP).

4 Financial Resources and Other Incentives

This chapter is made up of extracts from the SUMP Programmes of Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels-Capital Regions.

Flanders Region The motivation for the new holistic Mobility policy and new Decree is to provide a more ‘cost- efficient’ transport system. A more user-oriented and demand-oriented layered transport system is the opposite of the superseded supply-oriented system that was too costly and created adverse effects such as competition between modes (e.g. public transport with cycling). Advice from the Transport Regions will ensure a more integrated investment programme at both local, regional SUMP and Flanders level. For the Regional SUMPs, this means they have to work with predefined budget lines and prioritize actions. The Flemish government will also continue to provide specific financial incentives, such as grants, subsidies and cooperation agreements for infrastructure and non-infrastructural

40 projects or measures implemented to support (non-mandatory) updates in L-SUMPs or under the new regulatory framework programme supporting Regional SUMPs. Defining budgets and resource allocation is part of the multi-annual action plans, the final phase in the Regional SUMP planning (see 2.6.4.) In the guiding documents it is mentioned that financing the Regional SUMP should take into account the “budgetary margins” that have been defined by the government.

Wallonia Region

The ministry for Transport and Mobility of the Walloon government provides financial resources for the development and for the revision of a SUMP. The financial resources can cover up to 75% of the costs for personnel costs of the municipality as well as for external consultants. The maximum amounts are set to: . € 200,000 for municipalities with less than 50,000 inhabitants . € 250,000 for municipalities with more than 50,000 inhabitants

If municipalities collaborate for a SUMP, the ministry will evaluate whether the collaboration is relevant. If the collaboration is considered appropriate, the maximum amount for financial support is multiplied by the number of municipalities. The financial resources allocated as follows: . 30% upon approval of the application; . 30% on the basis of supporting documents showing the purpose of the plan and the accounting documents for personnel costs; and . 40% after the approval of the municipal mobility plan by the municipal council.

Besides financial resources, another incentive for municipalities is the possibility to obtain technical assistance from the Directorate-General for Transport, to designate a project designer, obtain a model specification or draw up an agreement between the municipality and the project designer. In addition, once the SUMP is in place, there are additional funding opportunities for projects involving improving multi-modal travel, public transport, cycling, walking, carpooling or accessibility. The maximum amounts of these projects are set to:  € 150,000 for municipalities with less than 10,000 inhabitants  € 200,000 for municipalities with 10,000 to 50,000 inhabitants  € 250,000 for municipalities with more than 50,000 inhabitants These financial incentives are called impulse credits and they are conditional upon having an L-SuMP or SUMP1. Currently this is no longer the case and funding can be obtained in absence of a SUMP. Finally, large cities with more than 50,000 inhabitants (this is the case for eight Walloon cities: Namur, Liège, Verviers, Charleroi, Tournai, Mouscron, La Louvière and Mons) can receive a grant from the region for the commitment of a mobility advisor or CeM.

1 The current minister decided not to apply this rule 41

Brussels-Capital Region

Good Move specifies that the L-SuMPS can be financed for 50% by the regional government. In addition, there are financial incentives for municipal investments that contribute to the objectives of the regional SUMP: An ordinance of 2018 specifies that financial resources for investments that contribute to the objectives of the regional SUMP are eligible for a higher percentage of funding.

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome

The National Promo Programme contributed to a cultural shift in terms of environment for Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMP) and in the organizational culture of transport planning as follows:

In Flanders, Renewed Act on 15 (SUMP) Transport Regions was adopted in Dec. 2018, being implemented in 2019-2020.

The Walloon region has a well-established urban transport planning framework that incorporates SUM planning with support from the regional level. The SUM planning occurs at different levels: (a) The “Plan urbain de mobilité” or PUM is an SUMP at the level of the functional city. (b) The “Plan InterCommunal de mobilité” or PICM is a mobility plan of several municipalities combined. (c) The “Plan Communal de mobilité ” or PCM is a mobility plan at the level of one municipality (i.e., an L-SuMP) (d) Finally, the “Plan Provincial de Mobilité” or PPM is a mobility plan at the level of the province. All decrees related to mobility will be reviewed gradually to be incorporated in the new Mobility Code starting 2019-2020.

In Brussels Region a new regional SUMP (3th) generation has been adopted Spring 2019, with a more proactive approach than the approach of the first two generations of regional SUMPs (called “Iris” plans). To make the regional and the municipal mobility strategies and projects more consistent with one another, the Brussels-Capital Region approved an Ordinance on 26 July 2013 giving regulatory status to its new regional SUMP, called Good Move. This Ordinance specifies that L-SuMPs need to be in line with the regional SUMP. The regional SUMP therefore guides the nineteen municipalities to adhere to a specific set of goals, targets and even actions. In turn, the regional SUMP has been established with strong involvement of the municipalities to create a shared vision and a dynamic partnership between the region and the municipalities. Finally, Brussels-Capital Region provides a set of practical

42 guidelines on the L-SuMP planning process, defining the planning cycle of the L-SuMP that follows the EU guidelines.

The situation in Belgium – with the scattered mobility compentences for the Regions is quite different, and was ongoing already long before Prosperity. In fact, Belgium was wrongly defined a take up country. Nevertheless effort on promotion and especially exchange of experience in the Task Force led to increase interest to promote Belgium in the European context of SUMP support in a leading role. Prosperity gave inspiration and input to certain topics, which finally resulted sometimes in updates or improvements of the SUMP national programmes ; e.g. Flanders, Walloon region. Further policy exchange on Ministry level happens in the intergovernmental consultations on the highest level.

Continuation of the SUMP promotion programme The BEPOMM network & steering board (NTF) remains active and will follow up on SUM policies. The scattered competences of the Regions however brings the NFP is a ‘delicate’ positions, not being able to influence fully (because Regional Ministries and Authorities finally decide).

Main Prosperity outcomes

Flanders Region Thanks to (Endurance) and Prosperity we could realise that Flanders should no longer be ‘humble’. The awareness (thanks to the benchmark research of WP3) that Flanders is leading made us spread this good news more publicly among stakeholders and towards the leading administrative responsible persons. This was also a leverage factor to constantly improve the SUMP programme, which was done finally in 2018-2019 (but not only as a result of Prosperity). Prosperity realised good contacts between NFP and MOW (Flemish Administration and its higher level representatives). NFP gained from that in general, being consulted as an expert partner in SUMP; e.g. in the process of SUMP renewal towards Regional approach. Flanders presented its ‘integral’ support approach towards L-SuMPs at three SUMP conferences : Dubrovnik, Nicosia and Groningen.

Walloon Region The Walloon Region was maybe the region that had to most beneficial potential, but also high level Ministry/Administration representatives encounter the bureaucratic barriers of Ministries’ cabinets or overall Regions problems, e.g. austerity policy.

There are more Prosperity external factors that influence weather or not SUMP policy will be improved. Prosperity realised good contacts between NFP and SPW (Walloon Administration and its higher level representatives). Exchange of experience will continue – e.g. cycling should become more priority topic. Cultural (and social-economic) differences sometimes remain a barrier for further cooperation.

Brussels Region M21 – as (BEPOMM) NFP is in permanent regular contact with the BCR and continues SUMP networking and help BCR help find EC funding opportunities (one of the BRC objectives is to double the EC projects funding budget). The Good Move Regional Mobility Plan as finally approved in 2019, after a long and intensive public consultation/participatory trajectory, has high ambitions to fulfill, but there is political will as leverage factor. Also, Brussels is coming more and more aware that it should become a good example of urban mobility, being the head center of European Institutions.

Appendix

National SUMP promo events Name of Date Multiple- City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd the event day er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / event attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) Local authorities www.mobiel Capacity Strategic Exchange of and their role 2017-03 no 38 co-organiser 21.be building planning experience in mobility hubs BE BE Social inclusion & www.mobiel Capacity Exchange of Awareness 2017-10 no 26 co-organiser SM in rural 21.be building experience raising areas BE BE www.duurza me- mobiliteit.be Regional /nieuws/stud Capacity Strategic Awareness 2019-04 no BE BE 218 co-organiser SUMPs iedag- building planning raising basisbereikb aarheid-een- terugblik

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

1 conference 2017-12 no no Leuven Local accessibility BE 2 public campaign 2017-9 yes yes apprx40 BE Mobitly week 3 public campaign 2018-10 yes yes 50 BE Mobility week 4 training/seminar/workshop Post graduate course 2018-10 no no Hasselt BE

5 meeting Bicylce meeting 2018-10 no no Gent BE

Table 2/3 – Target groups No. Politicians Urban SUMP contracts Stakeholders SUMP Mainstream General Private Other and decision mobility caretakers and in the public initiatives and public sectors sector makers on professionals EMW sector networks specialised stakeholders professi local and coordinators and media onals national level within platforms municipalities 1 secondar primary primary primary primary Primary secondary N/A secondary y 2 secondar secondary secondary primary secondary Secondary secondary primary secondary y 3 secondar secondary secondary primary secondary Secondary secondary primary secondary y 4 secondar N/A primary primary secondary Secondary N/A N/A secondary y 5 secondar primary primary primary primary Secondary secondary N/A secondary y

Table 3/3 – Additional information No Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / . attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose one) one) (choose one)

1 https://www.duurzame- co-organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Other

120 mobiliteit.be/kalender 2 https://www.duurzame- 100000 mobiliteit.be/dit-was-de-week- co-organiser Awareness raising Other Capacity building

van-de-mobiliteit-2017 3 https://www.duurzame- 130000 mobiliteit.be/dit-was-de-week- co-organiser Awareness raising Other Capacity building

van-de-mobiliteit-2018 4 Provinciale Hogeschool 12 co-organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Awareness raising Verkeerskunde PXL Hasselt 5 200 www.fietsberaad.be co-organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Awareness raising

Dissemination Target groups

f applies) f

/ Name of media of / Name

latforms

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives p networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage (i Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Cemateque brochu (SPW DoT) re Wallonie Mobiliteitsb rief (MOW other DoT Flanders) brochu Prosperity 2017 re brochure Muncipaliti es' support flyer to your 2018 mobility policy

Target groups

f applies) f

/ Name of media of / Name

latforms

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage (i Frequency exists) (if Link Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Regions' other own channels News newsp launches by apers regions Face to face other contacts with journalists De scientif verkeerssp ic ecialist journal (monthly) Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content.

Target groups

f applies) f

/ Name of media of / Name

latforms

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage (i Frequency exists) (if Link

websit M21 www.mobiel21. e website be

websit Prosperity www.sump- e website network.eu http://www.mo e- biel21.be/nl/co newsle ntent/prosperit tter M21 y-draait-op- newsletter volle-toeren

targete Netwerk d e- Duurzame mails Mobiliteit

Regular blogging SUPE 201,720,18 3-4 https:// SUPERBLOCK SUM regi RBLO 2,019 second prim prim seco second tim S, black carbon, primary primary primary primary P ona www.m CKS, ary ary ary ndary ary es car free cities, infor l obiel21. black a vote for

Target groups

f applies) f

/ Name of media of / Name

latforms

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage (i Frequency exists) (if Link carbon mati yea be/blog sustainable , car on r mobility, ... free cities, vote for sustain albe mobilit y, ... News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ------

53 w

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Bulgaria

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Lucia Ilieva | CSDCS

Date: June 2019

Status: Final

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 56

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 56

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 56

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 57

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 59

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 60

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 61

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 62

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 62

4 FINANCING ...... 63

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 64

APPENDIX ...... 66

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (5) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (6) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (7) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (8) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of

high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Stoyan Passev Varna RG TF Manager Todor Balabanov Varna Municipal Council member Margarita Stoykova MOEW observer Ludmila Dimitrova MT observer Pavel Hristov Member of the Parliament member Svetla Boneva Economic University member Mladen Ivanov Municipal PT-company member Garo Caprelyan Varna Municipality member Lucia Ilieva CSDCS Dep.Manager of TF Pepa Rizova CSDCS-Varna Branch member

Task Force meetings Four Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were the analysis of the state of SUMP in Bulgaria, the efforts to involve the individual ministries (meetings were held with the Ministry of Regional Development, Ministry of Transport and Ministry of Environment and Waters) and the cooperation with the Varna Regional Administration in order to establish a SUMP program at Regional level. The main output of the Task Force's work is the Varna Regional SUMP Programme and the commitment to the Task Force to continue its work beyond the PROSPERITY project. More information can be found in Appendix.

2.2 National SUMP network The build up of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc., that would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level

 be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network ENDURANCE Bulgaria Host of the Web address of the Contact E-mail address Tel. network network name number CSDCS http://www.csdcs.org/index.p Lachezar [email protected] 359887716 hp/bg/projects-bg/projects- Rossenov 123 2007-2013-bg/endurance- bg/endurance-network-bg Membership Cities/regions Other institutions 85 municipalities and 8 regions 51 schools and universities, 7 NGOs

In June 2019 - 11 of 19 (58%) of all Bulgarian cities over 50.000 inhabitants were network members. The common number of the members of the network is 289. Since the PROSPERITY project started (September 2016), the total number of Bulgarian city members increased from 20 to 25 and the total number of members increased from 200 to 289.

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

The city activation strategy was in particular designed for cities to join national existing or newly established SUMPs networks. As these networks have been already established in most of Prosperity countries within Endurance project, city activation is not needed any more in countries where national SUMP networks work well. For the rest of countries it is recommended to use the principles of it. It is relevant especially in Croatia and Cyprus which were not Endurance partners. As of June 2019 there are 25 Bulgarian cities listed on the country website and they are all members of the national SUMP network. Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project in Varna on various topics of SUMP. As defined in the AF, the coaching events were targeted especially to the employees of the transport department of Varna and other Varna stakeholders. Other cities were not invited.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 30.03.2018 Defining targets; Selecting 1 19 measures and implementing measures in SUMP

Coaching 2 04.07.2018 Introduction to the 1 14 communication and to stakeholder involvement; tTe elements of continuous communication Coaching 3 16.11.2018 Monitoring and evaluation of 1 15 SUMP

The main impact of coachings was the increased capacity of Varna municipal transport staff. The transport professionals from the municipality and the company “Municipal Car Parks and Blue Zone” needed to learn more about how to put in practice the SUMP steps and the linked activities related to the selection and development of effective package of measures. The team was involved in a number of activities ranging from the management of the newly established paid parking scheme in the city center of Varna to more strategic tasks and projects linked to new infrastructures and plans. There were many participants participating in two or three coaching events and this has enormously facilitated the discussion on the SUMP planning cycle. Some other activities and projects initiated by the city have been briefly introduced to “set the scene”: the reclamation of areas and facilities still into the perimeter and responsibility of the port authority (in conjunction with the works for the new seaport of Varna located in a new area); the construction of a road bridge crossing the lake of Varna and the projects, etc.

2.5 Training(s) One regular four-day training for was organised in the project city of Varna for the Bulgarian cities. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 12-15.11.2018 How does SUMP mesh with 16 21 Training statutory land use plans

Communication and stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP - measures Urban Transport Roadmaps tool

Monitoring and evaluation

The main impact of the training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in the participating cities.

2.6 Other meetings and dissemination activities Several types of other activities took place to promote SUMPs at national level: Meetings: - National SUMP Promo Events - annual national SUMP conference in own country (national training weeks are excluded). - Third-party Events - events with active participation (with own original content): presentation, leading a workshop, lecturing Dissemination: - Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project - Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Regular blogging – In terms of the PROSPERITY project a blog is represented as a dedicated section on the respective city website, on a respective national SUMP platform website, or on the CIVITAS PROSPERITY website. Regular blogging on own experience with the whole SUMP process (both, planning and implementation) by city representatives, experts and NFP in their own local language to encourage follower cities in the own country to become active. - News and case studies - news and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework State level The National legislation is one of the most crucial factors for the development of sustainable mobility policies in cities. According to the legal frame in Bulgaria, the central Government does not deal with the urban transport. The Ministry of Transport delivers the national transport policy through the Operational programme “Transport”. In May 2013 MTITC published the “Integrated Transport Strategy of Bulgaria till 2030” that focused mainly on infrastructure measures facilitating the intercity transport connections as well as the TEN-T corridors in the country. Public transport in cities as well as SUMP, MaaS and FTS were not a part of this Strategy.

Regional level The Regional Administrations (comprising several municipalities) are obliged to draw up the district transport schemes which include the intercity lines between two or more municipalities. The traffic organisation, the specific requirements for traffic road systems and public transport of passengers are monitored by the regional government. Most of the mobility services commonly applied for mobility management is not applicable at regional level due to a lack of specific regulations permitted by the national legal frame.

Local level The transport schemes in the urban areas are regulated by the Law of Automobile Transport. The municipal councils and mayors are responsible for policy and decision making related to the spatial and urban planning and development of the municipal territory. According to this law, each municipality must elaborate and adopt a specific Municipal urban spatial plan which includes a transport scheme. The basic document that the municipalities follow in the process of planning and design of the communication and transport systems of urban areas is the Regulation no 2/29.06.2004 for Planning of Transport systems of Urban territories published by the MRDPW. The municipalities are obliged to develop the transport system of urban areas considering the street grid, transport modes organisation i.e. the public transport, walking, parking, transport facilities (service and fuel stations, bus stations), and the facilities for traffic regulation and management. Each municipality is obliged to follow the principles of the Regulation by passing through the municipal council a specific municipal decision. After an intensive campaign for including SUMP into the Bulgarian legislation led by CSDCS and some other organizations, by the end of 2017 the above mentioned Regulation was updated (Regulation N RD-02-20-2 from 20.12.2017 г.) introducing SUMP as a non obligatory planning instrument for the first time. Actually it is written that a SUMP might be developed following the decision of the LG when occurs elaboration of a new urban transport system or updating of an existing system.

4 Financing In Bulgaria the financial resources are of crucial importance for implementing SUMPs. European resources have emerged as the main motivation for kick-starting SUM planning in the first 9 cities. Actually with the support of H2020 CIVITAS Projects Ruse is implementing part of the measures of their SUMP and Varna is performing the initial SUMP planning. Financial Incentives In the period 2007-2013 the OP »Regional development« led by MRDPW allocated resources for developing Integrated plans for urban transport (IPUT) for the seven major Bulgarian cities. These plans focused on the implementation of infrastructure measures sometimes accompanied with fragmented mobility initiatives, without considering public participation, thus working against SUMPs and provoking misunderstanding among local actors. Some municipalities (Sofia and Burgas) declared, after the implementation of their IPUT, that they have a SUMP and later they pretended to elaborate the 2nd version of their SUMPs. In fact, Burgas completed its first SUMP in 2016 and Sofia is still elaborating its first SUMP that has to be ready by the end of 2019. During the planning period 2014-21 the MRDPW allocated in the OP “Regions in growth” resources for integrated transport plans of 37 medium-sized cities in Bulgaria. Again the accent was put on the infrastructure but some cities used their resources for implementation of their SUMPs (Ruse, Gabrovo, Kardjali, Srara Zagora). The further comprehensive system of support for municipalities and regions should be achieved by deploying their own resources or asking for bank loans. Other Forms of Incentives

A number of incentives and mechanisms will be implemented that will stimulate the interest in SUM planning in municipalities, regions and responsible bodies at the national level. Varna RA and CSDCS use to organize annually SUMP trainings inviting representatives of the EU SUMP Platform and the JASPERS team for promoting the SUMP incentives in Bulgaria. The Varna RA will provide support for training and consulting the small municipalities in elaboration of the regional transport planning. When collaborating with other ministries (MOEW, MPH, MCE), SUMPs will be recommended as a tool for managing challenges indirectly related to mobility (e.g. inadequate air quality, relations between human health and movement, education in mobility in High schools and Universities, etc.).

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome In the Bulgarian conditions the main outcome of the project was the decision of the Varna Local Authority to elaborate a SUMP. Varna was the first Bulgarian city that decided to borrow money from the EBRD for a SUMP development. We can also mention as a positive result from the project the creation of the Task Force, the interest of its members to work behind the PROSPERITY project and the elaboration of the Regional SUMP Programme, accepted and approved by the Varna Regional Council. Due to the training and coaching events and the four national SUMP promo events conducted in the frames of the project, all Bulgarian municipalities were informed about the benefits of SUMP and many of them increased their knowledge of SUMP preparation, elaboration or implementation. The city of Ruse received some money from the OP “Regions in Growth” and thanks to the increased capacity of the municipal staff started implementing their SUMP. The main impact of coachings was the improved capacity of the Varna transport staff which is prepared for contributing to the SUMP elaboration and implementation.

The Promo Programme contributed to the change of the state document defining the manner of urban and regional planning – the North-East Strategy for Development (including Varna Region). After a series of discussions with the Varna Regional Governor and the mayors of the municipalities in Varna region, some general provisions related to SUMP (including sustainable mobility measures, flexible transport systems and last mile concept) were introduced in the main text of the Strategy, including the Varna SUMP as a prerequisite of larger scope of sustainable mobility planning at regional level. The Regional SUMP Programme of Varna was approved as a model for replication in other Bulgarian regions and the decision about the launching the Varna SUMP was officially taken. The Varna team assisted by CSDCS started the implementation of the preliminary SUMP measures just after the National SUMP training in November 2018 and by the end of the project some important measures were successfully implemented and reached a large public approval and satisfaction (new parking policy and enlargement of the Blue zone, pedestrian strategy, e-mobility, etc.). What worked well? The NTF was in fact a Regional TF because the ministerial representatives participated only as observers. The cooperation between the TF and the Varna Regional Authority worked very well. The manner of urban planning in Varna was changed. The proof were the decision of the Municipality to use the money from the OP “Regions in growth” for building a new infrastructure

64 for the new transport scheme that will be implemented by the SUMP, the successfully implemented preliminary SUMP measures in Varna, as well as the start of the implementation of many mobility initiatives in the Varna smaller municipalities. CSDCS and Varna enlarged their common cooperation with experienced partners. They applied for the EU IUC Programme and won a Cooperation project with the city of Santa Monica, California. The joint team had the possibility to learn and to exchange experience in SUMP and mobility measures during two mutual learning visits and participation in international conferences in EU and North America. What did not work well? The Bulgarian team did not achieve to persuade the ministries to take over the SUMP framework. After many meetings and discussions with the three ministries that might be concerned, they didn’t change their position that the SUMP is a municipal task and the state level should not provide any framework for SUMP development and implementation.

Continuation of the SUMP promotion programme The promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project with the elaboration and implementation of the Varna SUMP. The promotional activities are planned in the Regional SUMP Programme and the members of the TF are willing to continue working regardless the end of the project. Varna is intended to join the CIVITAS PORTIS project as a following city in order to implement some SUMP measures related to the Varna port.

Appendix

Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main agenda Main agenda: fill 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of other Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Launch 2017- Elaboration on action Capacity Awareness Exchange of Sofia Bulgaria 9 Meeting 06 plan level building raising experience Second 2017- Elaboration on legal Strategic Capacity Varna Bulgaria 7 Other Meeting 08 conditions planning building Third Meeting 2018- Preparation of National Strategic Exchange of Varna Bulgaria 7 Other 08 SUMP Programme planning experience Fourth Meeting Preparation of the 2019- Strategic Capacity Varna Bulgaria 6 specifications for the Other 06 planning building SUMP tender

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

1 meeting EU IUC City-to-City event 9-10.10.2018 yes yes Brussels Belgium

conference 2 CIVITAS 2018 19-21.09.2018 yes yes Umea Sweden

conference 3 CIVITAS 2017 28-30.09.2017 yes yes Torres Vedras Portugal

conference 4 REAL CORP 2019 2-4.04.2019 yes yes Karlsruhe Germany

Table 2/3 – Target groups No. Politicians and Urban mobility SUMP contracts Stakeholders SUMP Mainstream General Private Other decision professionals caretakers and in the public initiatives and public sectors sector makers on EMW sector networks specialised stakeholders professio local and coordinators and media nals national level within platforms municipalities

1 primary secondary secondary secondary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

2 secondary primary primary primary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A

3 secondary primary primary primary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A

4 secondary primary secondary primary secondary secondary N/A secondary N/A

Table 3/3 – Additional information No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords (choose Keywords (choose Keywords (choose one) one) one)

Exchange of 1 200 active participation Capacity building Strategic planning experience Exchange of 2 200 active participation Capacity building Awareness raising experience Exchange of 3 200 active participation Capacity building Awareness raising experience

4 250

Dissemination Target groups

am and specialised media specialised am and

if exists) if

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and Mainstre public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency ( Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Pro spe inte seco PROSPERI seco second prim rity rnat flyer 2017-06 primary primary N/A ndar N/A primary TY leaflets ndary ary ary pro ion y mot al ion SU SUMP seco MP nati second seco second prim book Guidelines 2018-03 primary primary N/A ndar N/A info ona ary ndary ary ary in BG y rma l tion Pro spe inte CIVITAS seco seco second prim rity rnat poster PROSPERI 2017-01 primary primary N/A ndar N/A primary ndary ary ary pro ion TY y mot al ion

Target groups

am and specialised media specialised am and

if exists) if

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and Mainstre public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency ( Link Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Pro spe seco seco regi radio Radio second second prima second rity 2016-09 N/A ndar N/A N/A ndar ona spot Varna ary ary ry ary pro y y l mot ion Pro spe seco seco regi TV second second second prima second rity TV Varna 2017-09 N/A ndar N/A ndar ona spot ary ary ary ry ary pro y y l mot ion Pro spe "Cherno seco regi newsp second second prim seco second rity more" 2016-09 N/A N/A N/A ndar ona apers ary ary ary ndary ary pro newspaper y l mot ion

Target groups

am and specialised media specialised am and

if exists) if

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and Mainstre public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency ( Link Pro spe seco regi newsp "Moreto" second second prim seco second rity 2016-09 N/A N/A N/A ndar ona apers newspaper ary ary ary ndary ary pro y l mot ion Pro spe "Cherno seco regi newsp second second prim seco second rity more" 2017-09 N/A N/A N/A ndar ona apers ary ary ary ndary ary pro newspaper y l mot ion Pro spe "Cherno seco regi newsp second second prim seco second rity more" 2018-09 N/A N/A N/A ndar ona apers ary ary ary ndary ary pro newspaper y l mot ion

Target groups

am and specialised media specialised am and

if exists) if

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and Mainstre public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency ( Link Pro spe seco seco regi radio Radio second second prima second rity 2018-07 N/A ndar N/A N/A ndar ona spot Varna ary ary ry ary pro y y l mot ion Pro spe seco seco regi radio Radio second second prima second rity 2018-09 N/A ndar N/A N/A ndar ona spot Varna ary ary ry ary pro y y l mot ion Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Pro spe inte websit perman prim seco second prim rity rnat CSDCS site primary primary N/A N/A N/A weekly e ent ary ndary ary ary pro ion mot al ion www.csdcs.org

Target groups

am and specialised media specialised am and

if exists) if

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and Mainstre public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency ( Link Pro spe seco nati social perman second seco second prim rity Facebook primary primary N/A ndar N/A ona weekly https://www.fac media ent ary ndary ary ary pro y l mot ebook.com/club ion sdcs/ SU seco MP nati websit NAMRB- Nov.20 second seco second prim www.namrb- primary N/A N/A ndar N/A info ona annually e site 16 ary ndary ary ary activ.org y rma l tion SU Varna MP regi websit on second second prim seco second prim municipality N/A N/A primary info ona other www.varna.bg e events ary ary ary ndary ary ary site rma l tion Varna SU regi websit on second second prim seco second prim www.vn.govern Province N/A N/A primary MP ona other e events ary ary ary ndary ary ary ment.bg site info l

Target groups

am and specialised media specialised am and

if exists) if

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and Mainstre public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency ( Link rma tion Regular blogging ------

News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ------

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Cyprus

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Nicole Mavrovounioti, Project Manager, Stratagem Ltd

Date: June 2019

Status: Final

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 80

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 80

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 80

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 82

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 84

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 85

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 85

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 87

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 87

4 FINANCING ...... 87

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 88

APPENDIX ...... 89

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (9) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (10) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (11) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (12) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial onditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Public Works Department, Senior Michael mlambrinos@pw Ministry of Transport, Executive Lambrinos d.mcw.gov.cy Communications and Works Engineer Public Works Department, Transport Demetris demdeme@cytan Ministry of Transport, Planner/Enginee Demetriou et.com.cy Communications and Works r Stelios Architect /Urban architect@limass Limassol Municipality olmunicipality.co Stylianides Planner m.cy Public Works Department, Elpida e.epaminonda@g Ministry of Transport, Engineer Epaminonta mail.com Communications and Works Konstantinos Department of Town Planning and [email protected] Planning Officer Tringides Housing oi.gov.cy Directorate of Control, Ministry of Anna amichalopoulou Transport, Communications and Civil Engineer Michalopoulou @mcw.gov.cy Works Secretaty of Yiannis Scientific and Technical Chamber Limassol y- kakoullis@spider Kakoullis of Cyprus Regional net.com.cy Committee Directorate of Control, Ministry of [email protected]. Klio Xyda Transport, Communications and Civil Engineer cy Works Public Works Department, Civil Engineer/ Demetris demetris.psyllides Ministry of Transport, Transport Psyllides @hotmail.com Communications and Works Planner Directorate of Control, Ministry of Agathi [email protected] Transport, Communications and Director Christou ov.cy Works Pantelis demosipsona@cy Ypsonas Municipality Mayor Georgiou tanet.com.cy Public Works Department, Civil Engineer/ [email protected] Vana Gkania Ministry of Transport, transport w.gov.cy Communications and Works Planner Public Works Department, Civil Engineer/ Katerina kstylianou@pwd. Ministry of Transport, transport Stylianou mcw.gov.cy Communications and Works Planner

Name Organisation Function Email Public Works Department, Civil Engineer/ Christina christina.a.christo Ministry of Transport, transport doulou@outlouk. Christodoulou Communications and Works Planner com politistiko@mesa Elena Moniati Mesa Yitonia Municiplity Town Planner yitonia.com.cy michalis.mina12 Michalis Minas Mesa Yitonia Municiplity Engineer @gmail.com Neophytoula n.angelidou@larn Larnaca Municipality Town Planner Angelidou aka.com Technical v.steliou@larnaka Vasos Steliou Larnaca Municipality Engineer .com Neophitos municipal.engine Paphos Municipality Civil Engineer Zavrides [email protected] Apostolos Managing [email protected] Tredit SA Bizakis Director r

Task Force meetings Three Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were the analysis of the state of SUMP in the Czech Republic, the intersection of the agenda of individual ministries and the topic of urban mobility and later the creation of the SUMP Programme. The main output of the Task Force's work is the SUMP Programme and the commitment to the Task Force to continue its work beyond the PROSPERITY project. The structure of NTF was effective. STE has organised many task force meetings and knowledge of experience events where participants had the chance to discuss about the importance of SUMP and SUM programmes. Also STE has disseminate the activities through social media and its website. More information can be found in Appendix.

2.2 National SUMP network The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network National SUMP Network Host of the Web address of the Contact E-mail address Tel. network network name number Stratagem http://www.epomm.eu/endura Nicole [email protected] 357252468 Energy nce/index.php?id=2809&cou Mavrovou 02 ntry=cy nioti Membership Cities/regions Other institutions 4 cities,  The Public Works Limassol Department Paphos  The Ministry of Transport, Communications and Nicosia Works of Cyprus Larnaca  The Department of Town Planning and Housing  The Municipalities of Limassol, Nicosia, Larnaca and Paphos  The Department of Environment  The Planning Board  The Cyprus Tourism Organization  The Scientific and Technical Chamber of Cyprus  The Cyprus University of  The Road Transport Department  The Cyprus Tourism Organization  The Ministry of Health

 The Ministry of Education and Culture

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

As of June 2019 there are 4 Cypriot cities listed on the country website, however not all are members of the national SUMP network. Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 01/12/17 Adopting the SUMP approach 4 13 for small and mid-sized cities - Coaching 2 18/05/18 Defining targets, selecting and 4 10 implementing measures Coaching 3 12/12/18 Expectations for the approval 4 17 and implementation of the SUMP of Limassol

The main impact of coachings was achieving of a consensus on the need to create a new department of transport planning within the municipality structure of project city. The process has started during the PROSPERITY project however it will not be implemented by the end of the project.

2.5 Training(s) One regular five-day training was organised in the project city of Limassol. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2017-11-27 – Adopting the SUMP approach for 4 20 Training 2017-12-30 small and mid sizes cities Communication and stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP - measures Urban Transport Roadmaps tool

Monitoring and evaluation

The main impact of the first training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in 4 Cypriot cities.

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework The National legislation is one of the most critical factors for the development of sustainable mobility policies in cities. In Cyprus, transport planning is well established with a framework that incorporates SUMPs with the support from the national and regional levels. The urban mobility policy is regulated at the national governmental level with dedicated programmes, currently there are no major policies supporting SUMPs. The implementation and adoption of SUMPs is not mandatory however, the MTCW has decided to develop SUMPs in all urban areas in Cyprus. Moreover, it is expected that the outcomes of the SUMPs will be adopted by the City Councils concerned. 4 Financing In Cyprus, the financial resources are of significant importance for the implementation of the SUMPs. Although no formal incentives are provided, securing EU co-funding is much easier if a city has developed a SUMP. For the preparation of SUMPs, 15% of funds comes from governmental budget and 85% comes from EU budget.

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome In Cypriot conditions the main outcome of the project is creation of National Task Force, interest of its members to work behind the PROSPERITY project and elaboration of National SUMP Programme. Due to the training and national SUMP promo events the PROSPERITY project contributed to increase the knowledge of SUMPs among Cypriot cities which were in different levels of SUMP preparation, elaboration or implementation. The main impact of coachings was achieving of a consensus on the need to create a new department of transport planning within the municipality structure of project city. The process has started during the PROSPERITY project however it will not be implemented by the end of the project. NTF brought key stakeholders from all cities together where we had a constructive dialogue regarding the ambitions, priorities, other relevant topics of the SUMP and a plan conditions of urban mobility future development. SUMP Programme is the first SUMP related national strategy which builds on detail analysis and problem description, it designed solutions, set responsibilities and compiled action plan. What worked well NTF was active and all participating ministries were willing to find strategies and measures for improvement the mobility situation in Cypriot cities. Also there was a well exchange of experience on how the national context is perceived at a city level and how the national level could further help cities in SUMP development. What did not work well In Cyprus its difficult to change the mentality of stakeholders and sometimes hard to convince them about positive effects of SUMP. Continuation of the SUMP promotion programme Promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project, promotion activities are planned in SUMP Programme, all members of NTF are willing to continue to work regardless the end of the project.

Appendix

Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main Main agenda: fill other 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of agenda Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Launch Introduction about SUMP and Awareness Exchange of 23/06/17 Limassol Cyprus 14 Other Meeting Prosperity Project raising experience

Second Learning needs and measures of Exchange of Awareness Strategic 20/07/18 Limassol Cyprus 10 Other Meeting SUMP Programme experience raising planning

Third Meeting Stakeholder Involvement on Exchange of Awareness 14/12/18 Limassol Cyprus 17 SUMP experience raising

National SUMP promo events Name of the Date Multiple- City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event day event er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) 5th EU 5th EU active Awareness Exchange of Conference 2018-05 yes Nicosia Cyprus 14 Conference on participation raising experience on SUMP SUMP Public Public active Awareness Exchange of Consultation 2017-04 no Nicosia Cyprus 14 Consultation participation raising experience event event

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

1 public campaign Kataklimos Fair 2018-05 yes yes Larnaca Cyprus

public campaign 2 Beer Festival 2018-08 yes yes Nicosia Cyprus

public campaign 3 Wine Festival 2018-09 yes yes Limassol Cyprus

training/seminar/workshop 4 1st workshop of exchange of experience 2018-06 no no Limassol Cyprus

training/seminar/workshop 5 1st coaching event 2017-12 no no Limassol Cyprus

training/seminar/workshop 6 2nd coaching event 2018-05 no no Limassol Cyprus

public campaign 7 Sustainablie Mobility Week 2018-09 no yes Limassol Cyprus

training/seminar/workshop 8 3rd coaching event 12/2018 no yes Limassol Cyprus

training/seminar/workshop 9 2nd workshop of exchange of experience 11/01/19 no no Limassol Cyprus

1 secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary primary secondary N/A

2 secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary primary secondary N/A

3 secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary secondary primary secondary N/A

secondar 4 primary primary primary secondary primary N/A N/A secondary y secondar 5 primary primary primary secondary primary N/A N/A secondary y secondar 6 primary primary primary secondary primary N/A N/A primary y

7 primary primary primary secondary secondary secondary primary secondary N/A

secondar 8 primary primary primary secondary primary N/A N/A secondary y secondar 9 primary primary primary secondary primary N/A N/A secondary y

1 active participation Awareness raising

2 active participation Awareness raising

3 active participation Awareness raising

Exchange of 4 13 organiser Awareness raising experience Exchange of 5 13 organiser Awareness raising Strategic planning experience Exchange of 6 12 organiser Awareness raising Capacity building experience

7 active participation Awareness raising Exchange of experience

8 15 organiser Awareness raising Exchange of experience

Exchange of 9 12 organiser Awareness raising experience

Dissemination Target groups

and and decision makers on

/ Name of media of / Name

neral public neral

Politicians level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream Ge stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Distribution Pro of Civitas spe inte Prosperity rity brochu prim prim second prim rna flyers 2018-05 primary primary primary N/A N/A pro re ary ary ary ary tio during 5th mo nal EU tio conference n Distribution Pro nati brochu prim prim second prim of Civitas 2018-06 primary primary primary N/A N/A spe ona re ary ary ary ary Prosperity rity l

Target groups

and and decision makers on

/ Name of media of / Name

neral public neral

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link flyers pro during the mo TRACE tio Project n Distribution Pro of Civitas spe inte Prosperity seco seco rity brochu second second second second prim second rna flyers 2018-05 ndar ndar N/A pro re ary ary ary ary ary ary tio during y y mo nal Kataklismo tio s Fair n Distribution Pro of Civitas inte seco seco spe brochu Prosperity second second second second prim second rna 2018-08 ndar ndar N/A rity re flyers ary ary ary ary ary ary tio y y pro during Beer nal mo Festival

Target groups

and and decision makers on

/ Name of media of / Name

neral public neral

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link tio n Distribution Pro of Civitas spe inte Prosperity seco seco rity brochu second second second second prim second rna flyers 2018-09 ndar ndar N/A pro re ary ary ary ary ary ary tio during y y mo nal Wine tio Festival n Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. 1st Pro Workshop spe of rity nati newsp second prim prim second prim second Exchange 2018-06 primary primary N/A pro ona apers ary ary ary ary ary ary of mo l Experience tio

and 2nd n

Target groups

and and decision makers on

/ Name of media of / Name

neral public neral

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Task Force Meeting in Limassol

Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. SU MP http://sump- regi websit Prosperity prim prim prim prim info network.eu/citie 2017-06 primary primary primary primary primary ona e Limassol ary ary ary ary rm s- l atio countries/limass n ol/ 5th SU inte social Conference prim prim prim prim MP rna 2018-05 primary primary primary primary primary media in Nicosia, ary ary ary ary info tio Cyprus rm nal

Target groups

and and decision makers on

/ Name of media of / Name

neral public neral

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link atio n Pro 2nd Task spe inte Force rity social prim prim prim prim rna Meeting in 2018-07 primary primary primary primary primary pro media ary ary ary ary tio Limassol mo nal Cyprus tio n SU http://www.epo MP inte mm.eu/enduran websit Endurance prim prim prim prim info rna 2018-05 primary primary primary primary primary ce/index.php?id e project ary ary ary ary rm tio =2809&country atio nal =cy n

Regular blogging

Target groups

and and decision makers on

/ Name of media of / Name

neral public neral

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link ------

News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ------

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

the Czech Republic

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk SPERAT | CDV

Responsible Co-Author:

Date: June 2019

Status: Final

100

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 102

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 102

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 102

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 103

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 105

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 106

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 106

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 107

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 107

4 FINANCING ...... 108

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 110

APPENDIX ...... 111

101

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (13) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (14) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (15) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (16) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

102

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Luďek Sosna Ministry of Transport officer - head [email protected] of TF Vít Sedmidubský Ministry of Transport officer [email protected] Jiří Vlček Ministry of Regional officer [email protected] Development Magdalena Ministry of Environment officer magdalena.buresova@mz burešová p.cz Ondřej Fries Ministry of Health officer [email protected] Jana Svobodová The City of Hradec officer [email protected] Kralové z Zbyněk Sperat CDV, CIVINET Czech NFP, [email protected] and Slovak Republics researcher Miroslava Ministry of Education officer miroslava.salavcova@ms Salavcová mt.cz Renáta Slabá Ministry of Transport officer [email protected]

Anna Batulková Ministry of Transport officer [email protected]

Task Force meetings Six Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were the analysis of the state of SUMP in the Czech Republic, the intersection of the agenda of individual ministries and the topic of urban mobility and later the creation of the SUMP Programme. The main output of the Task Force's work is the SUMP Programme and the commitment to the Task Force to continue its work beyond the PROSPERITY project. More information can be found in Appendix. 2.2 National SUMP network The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment).

103

The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network CIVINET Česká a Slovenská republika, CIVINET Czech and Slovak Republics Host of the Web address of Contact E-mail address Tel. number network the network name CDV www.civinet.cz Zbyněk [email protected] +420 608 301 SPERAT 485 Membership Cities/regions Other institutions České Budějovice Dopravný podnik mesta Košice Přerov Nadace Partnerství Litoměřice Asociace cyklistických měst Hradec Králové Výskumné centrum Žilinskej univerzity Třebíč v Žiline Jihlava ROPID Třinec Dopravný podnik mesta Košice Karlovy Vary Zlín Liberec Banská Bystrica Olomouc Svit Praha Žilina Brno

In June 2019 - 8 of 18 (44%) of all Czech cities over 50.000 inhabitants were network members. Since the PROSPERITY project started (September 2016), the total number of Czech network members increased from 11 to 13 members. Slovak member cities are not calculated as Slovakia is not PROSPERITY partner.

104

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

The city activation strategy was in particular designed for cities to join national existing or newly established SUMPs networks. As these networks have been already established in most of Prosperity countries within Endurance project, city activation is not needed any more in countries where national SUMP networks work well. For the rest of countries it is recommended to use the principles of it. It is relevant especially in Croatia and Cyprus which were not Endurance partners. As of June 2019 there are 18 Czech cities listed on the country website, however not all are members of the national SUMP network. Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

105

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 2018-02-28 Communication and 3 16 stakeholder involvement Coaching 2 2018-06-14 Achieving political and 3 12 internal buy-in Coaching 3 2019-01-24 How does SUMP mesh with 3 18 statutory land use plans

2.5 Training(s) One regular four-day training for was organised in the project city of Hradec Králové for Czech cities. Another one-day extra training took place in Prague. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2018-06-11 - Urban Transport Roadmaps 10 26 Training 14 tool Use of public space

Communication and stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP / measures Achieving political and internal buy-in Extra 2019-05-15 Urban Mobility Context & 8 18 training Principles - Basic Information on Urban Mobility for Local Politicians The main impact of the first training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in 10 already experienced cities. The second training attracted 8 cities and was focused preferably on newly elected politicians who are not oriented in urban mobility context yet. They were provided with basic information on sustainable urban mobility.

106

2.6 Other meetings and dissemination activities Several types of activities took place to promote SUMPs at national level: Meetings: - National SUMP Promo Events - annual national SUMP conference in own country (national training weeks are excluded). - Third-party Events - events with active participation (with own original content): presentation, leading a workshop, lecturing Dissemination: - Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project - Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Regular blogging – In terms of the PROSPERITY project a blog is represented as a dedicated section on the respective city website, on a respective national SUMP platform website, or on the CIVITAS PROSPERITY website. Regular blogging on own experience with the whole SUMP process (both, planning and implementation) by city representatives, experts and NFP in their own local language to encourage follower cities in the own country to become active. - News and case studies - news and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework Currently, the SUMP is not legally defined in the Czech planning process. Discussions on this topic have been held since 2012 - 2013 when the Czech professionals became more familiar with the SUMP concept. Although the SUMP is not legally based, cities are strongly motivated to adopt it, especially thanks to the funding of implementation from the Operational Programme Transport (MoT) and the Integrated Operational Programme (MMR). As a result, in early 2019, most cities over 40,000 have elaborated and approved SUMP, or at least SUMF.

The current opinion of responsible ministry on the legislative framework The current situation, when SUMP is required to receive subsidies for transport measures, results in cities making SUMPs without being forced to do so by legislation. At the beginning of 2019 this situation is satisfactory from the point of view of the MoT, especially given that the SUMP is still a fresh and unsettled topic in the Czech Republic, when it is necessary to evaluate the first generation of SUMP, update the methodology for SUMP processing and set up quality and binding evaluation to other subsidy funds (e.g. SFDI). The issue of funding the SUMP and its enforcement process is not resolved if it is legally a mandatory planning tool.

107

As part of the preparation of the SUMP Programme, the possibility of legislative incorporation of the SUMP into the Building Act was consulted, namely at the Department of Spatial Planning, Department of Conceptual and Methodological MMR. The discussion showed that the SUMP as a strategy document (only) per segment - transport does not meet the requirements to become a spatial planning tool. One of the reasons is that not all transport measures proposed in the SUMP are projected into the land use plan, many of the measures are at organizational, procedural, financial, etc., ie non-territorial level (soft measures). Therefore, the attitude of not including SUMP in the system of land-use planning documents is currently in place; let SUMP be a basis, but not a spatial planning tool.

Long term horizon It is necessary to further discuss the issue of legislative framework and legalize it in the appropriate form of SUMP in order to play a significant and stable role in the future and to fulfil the ambitions stemming from this SUMP Programme. Experience from countries where SUMP is more and longer time established has shown that the SUMP framework is a natural and beneficial developmental SUMP level.

Even though the classic city strategic plan is not defined by legislation today, in the case of SUMP, this definition will be more urgent in the future if it is linked to specific expertise, work of urban mobility coordinators, funding and SUMP quality check.

In the long term the SUMP legislative framework can be the basis for further development of sustainable urban mobility planning which defines an organizational framework, minimum SUMP standards in terms of monitoring, evaluating and the quality check of plans as such. It can also be the basis for integrating this planning with other sectors, especially the environment. In addition, the law can provide a basis for stable SUMP funding from national sources and a reduction in dependence on EU resources.

The prospective process of preparation - whether the law is new (incl. assessing the possibilities and consequences of its introduction) or using any existing legal support - will be conducted by the Ministry of Transport in cooperation with the NTF. Cooperation with other sectors will be part of the process. The SUMP programme proposes regularly updated analysis of legislative grasp options.

4 Financing One of the objectives of the SUMP Programme is to secure funding for the elaboration and implementation of the SUMP of the current first generation, and especially the next generations. The purpose of the SUMP's systematic financial support is to reduce cities' dependence on insecure external resources, ideally to achieve a higher and more consistent level of SUMP quality and to encourage cities to implement the actions set out in the SUMP and their action plans, based on the established methodology and minimum standards for SUMPs and its specific parts.

108

Current state of SUMP funding Currently, most SUMPs (in terms of their elaboration, not implementation) are funded from the city's own resources. To a limited extent SUMPs are financed from external sources; either from the subsidy programmes of the Ministry of Environment (National Programme Environment, according to Call No. 9/2017, the contribution can reach up to CZK 1 million) or MPSV (Operational Programme Employment), or from other non-state grant programmes. The possibility of obtaining subsidies for the acquisition of SUMP is a great motivation for cities to elaborate them, and the only motivation for some cities. Some cities apply for the SUMP subsidy even when their priority is to obtain only a specific analysis or partial document (a transport model, sectoral strategies, etc.), and therefore lack motivation to develop and enact the rest of the SUMP.

Another great motivation for SUMP / SUMF, especially for larger cities is the need for approved SUMP / SUMF for the possibility of getting funds from the Operational Programme Transport (OPD) (exclusively for road infrastructure projects) and the Integrated Regional Operational Programme (IROP) (road, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure, construction and modernization of transfer terminals, support for low emission vehicles, telematic infrastructure, etc.). This implies a deeper focus of the plans on infrastructure projects than on efforts to change the mobility paradigm, as also highlighted in the Partnership for Urban Mobility Action Plan (2018). The question is how many cities would have elaborated SUMPs if the grant programmes were not in place, in particular for its elaboration.

Outlook for SUMP funding The main benefits of SUMP implementation are for the cities themselves, so in the future, they should fund the elaboration of mobility plans primarily from their own budgets with the possibility of a limited share of subsidies. The importance of SUMP for the city will continue to increase, compared to infrastructure measures, elaboration of the plan is not a significant cost item in the city´s budget. SUMP recommends revising subsidy programmes that will allow cities to receive SUMP co-financing. These subsidy programmes should (if applicants are cities that already have first generation SUMPs approved) take into account the quality of the previous SUMP and, where appropriate, its level of fulfillment. In the future it should not be possible to purchase the entire SUMP from grants without own contribution of the city. In terms of financing the implementation of SUMPs, cities are already very strongly motivated to elaborate SUMPs due to the possibility of getting subsidies for the implementation of infrastructure transport measures. It is desirable to extend this principle and to link SUMP with other subsidy programmes, eg MoE or SFDI. Compared to the current situation, in the future the support and funding of SUMPs and their implementation should be more focused on the essence of SUMPs and soft measures to stimulate sustainable mobility and increase urban skills in communication and public participation.

109

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome

In Czech conditions the main outcome of the project is creation of National Task Force, interest of its members to work behind the PROSPERITY project and elaboration of National SUMP Programme. Due to the training and national SUMP promo events (CIVINET CZ-SK conferences) the PROSPERITY project contributed to increase the knowledge of SUMPs among Czech cities which were in different levels of SUMP preparation, elaboration or implementation. The main impact of coachings was achieving of a consensus on the need to create a new department of transport planning within the municipality structure of project city. The process has started during the PROSPERITY project however it will not be implemented by the end of the project. NTF brought 5 ministries to one table to discuss a plan conditions of urban mobility future development. SUMP Programme is the first SUMP related national strategy which builds on detail analysis and problem description, it designed solutions, set responsibilities and compiled action plan. What worked well NTF was active and all participating ministries were willing to find strategies and measures for improvement the mobility situation in Czech cities. They all were active in SUMP Programme elaboration. What did not work well Cities involvement in events organised within the project was not as high as was thought at the project start. Municipal staff and local politicians are overloaded by work which was the reason for their lower attendance. Continuation of the SUMP promotion programme Promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project, promotion activities are planned in SUMP Programme, all members of NTF are willing to continue to work regardless the end of the project.

110

Appendix

Task Force meetings

Task Force Date City Country Number of Main agenda Main agenda: fill 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings attendees other Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Launch 2017- Prague CZ 11 Other Information about Awareness Exchange Meeting 01 PROSPERITY raising of project, members experience of TF Second 2017- Prague CZ 8 Preparation of Content of SUMP Exchange Strategic Meeting 06 National SUMP promo of planning Programme programme experience Third Meeting 2017- Prague CZ 14 Elaboration on quality Content of SUMP Exchange Strategic 10 assessment promo of planning programme experience 4th meeting 2019- Prague CZ 9 Preparation of Strategic Exchange Capacity 01 National SUMP planning of building Programme experience 5th meeting 2019- Prague CZ 9 Preparation of Strategic Awareness Capacity 03 National SUMP planning raising building Programme 6th meeting 2019- Prague CZ 10 Preparation of Strategic Capacity Awareness 04 National SUMP planning building raising Programme

111

National SUMP promo events Name of Date Multiple- City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd the event day er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / event attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) CIVINET 2017- yes Olomouc CZ 71 www.civine organiser Awareness Exchange Capacity CZ-SK 05 t.cz raising of building Conferenc experience e CIVINET 2018- yes Brno CZ 70 www.civine organiser Awareness Exchange Capacity CZ-SK 04 t.cz raising of building Conferenc experience e CIVINET 2019- yes Bratislav Slovakia 44 www.civine organiser Capacity Exchange Strategic CZ-SK 04 a t.cz building of planning Conferenc experience e

112

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

conference 1 City Changers Conference 2017-06 yes no Ostrava CZ

conference 2 Regio 2020 Conference 2017-09 no no Jihlava CZ

excursion 3 Excursion to Dresden 2017-10 yes yes Dresden GE

training/seminar/workshop 4 URBIS conference 2018-04 yes yes Brno CZ

conference 5 Bicycle Transport Conference 2018-10 yes yes Banská Slovakia Slovakia Bystrica

training/seminar/workshop 6 Urban Mobility Planning 2018-11 yes yes Žilina Slovakia

113

2 primary N/A N/A secondary N/A N/A N/A secondary seconda ry 3 secondary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

4 primary primary secondary secondary secondary secondary N/A secondary seconda ry 5 primary primary secondary secondary N/A secondary N/A N/A N/A

6 primary secondary secondary N/A N/A secondary N/A N/A N/A

114

1 100 www.citychangers.cz active participation Strategic planning Exchange of Awareness experience raising

2 40 www.regio2020.cz active participation Exchange of Capacity building experience

3 25 www.civinet.cz organiser Exchange of Strategic planning Capacity building experience 4 150 http://www.bvv.cz/urbis/urbis- co-organiser Strategic planning Awareness raising Capacity building

2018/ 5 35 http://www.cyklodoprava.sk/k active participation Exchange of Awareness raising

onferencia/ experience

6 50 www.civinet.cz organiser Strategic planning Capacity building Exchange of experience

115

Dissemination Target groups

ians ians and decision makers on

Politic level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and medi specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind media of / Title Name date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project broch Brochure 2017-12 primary seconda seconda seco N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ Prosp nati ure Prosperity ry ry ndary A erity onal promot ion poste Poster 2017-12 primary seconda N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ Prosp nati r Prosperity ry A erity onal promot ion Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. news Parlamentni 2018-06 seconda N/A N/A seco N/A seconda prima seconda N/ SUMP nati https://www.parla paper listy ry ndary ry ry ry A inform onal mentnilisty.cz/polit s ation ika/obce- volicum/Hradec- Kralove-Tyden- odbornych- prednasek-k-

116

Target groups

ians ians and decision makers on

Category Kind media of / Title Name date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link cyklodoprave-ve- meste-539841 scient Regionální 2018-03 primary seconda N/A prima N/A seconda prima seconda N/ SUMP nati http://www.region ific rozvoj mezi ry ry ry ry ry A inform onal alnirozvoj.eu/2018 journ teorií a praxí ation 03/participace- al verejnosti-na- planovani- udrzitelne- mobility-inspirace- z-nemeckych- mest Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Zpravodaj 2018-03 seconda primary seconda N/A secon N/A N/A N/A N/ Prosp nati Q http://www.civinet. CIVINET ry ry dary A erity onal cz/wp- (CIVINET promot content/uploads/2 Newsletter) ion 018/04/No14- CIVINET- networks- newsletter.pdf

117

Target groups

ians ians and decision makers on

Category Kind media of / Title Name date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Zpravodaj 2019-01 seconda primary seconda N/A secon N/A N/A N/A N/ SUMP nati Q https://www.civine CIVINET ry ry dary A inform onal t.cz/wp- (CIVINET ation content/uploads/2 Newsletter) 019/03/No18- CIVINET- networks- newsletter.pdf web 2019-03 primary primary seconda seco secon N/A N/A N/A N/ Prosp nati https://www.dobra dobramesta. ry ndary dary A erity onal mesta.cz/aktuality/ cz promot 615/nove- ion vznikajici- platforma- mestske-mobility- se-chce- inspirovat- projektem-civitas- prosperity. Regular blogging CIVINET 2018-03 seconda primary seconda N/A secon N/A N/A N/A N/ SUMP nati http://www.civinet. Blog ry ry dary A inform onal cz ation

118

Target groups

ians ians and decision makers on

Category Kind media of / Title Name date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ------

119

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Germany

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk SPERAT | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Martina Hertel, Dr.-Ing. Wulf-Holger Arndt | DIFU

Date: July 2019

Status: Final

120

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 122

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 122

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 122

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 124

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 126

2.4 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 127

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 127

4 FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND OTHER INCENTIVES ...... 128

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 129

APPENDIX ...... 130

121

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (17) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (18) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (19) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (20) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and 122

implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Difu (German Institute of Dr.-Ing. Wulf- Urban Affairs; Deutsches Project leader Prosperity [email protected] Holger Arndt Institut für Urbanistik) Difu (German Institute of Head of department Tilman Bracher Urban Affairs; Deutsches [email protected] (Mobility) Institut für Urbanistik) Dr. Kirstin Difu (German Institute of Lindloff/Fabian Urban Affairs; Deutsches Departement for Mobility [email protected] Drews Institut für Urbanistik) G23 (B) : Departement Federal Ministry of of Public transport steffen.wulfes@b Steffen Wulfes Transport and Digital (Personenverkehr, mvi.bund.de Infrastructure Öffentliche Verkehrssysteme) Federal Ministry for Referat IG I 5, Markus Environment, Nature environment and Markus.Becker@b Becker/Thomas Conservation, Building and transportation (Umwelt mu.bund.de Patz Nuclear Safety und Verkehr) Federal Ministry of the volker.gerhard@b Volker Gerhard Interior, Building and Referat SW I 5 mi.bund.de Community Federal Ministry of the jacqueline.modes Jacqueline Modes Interior, Building and Referat SW I 5 @bmi.bund.de Community State Ministry of Economic Affairs, Energy, transport Department of Mobility, and regional development in Logistics, Inland water Dr. Bernd bernd.schuster@w state of Hessen (Hessisches transportation (Referat Schuster irtschaft.hessen.de Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Mobilität, Logistik, Energie, Verkehr und Binnenschifffahrt) Landesentwicklung)

Mobilitätsmanagment, Ministerium für Verkehr evelin.unger- Evelin Unger-Azadi kommunale [email protected] NRW Mobilitätskonzepte

Department of Transport Thomas Kiel Association of municipalities and Civil Engineering thomas.kiel@staed d‘Aragon (Deutscher Städtetag) (Referat Verkehr und tetag.de Tiefbau) Association of municipalities marc.elxnat@dstg Jan Strehmann (Deutscher Städte- und Department Transport b.de Gemeindebund)

123

Center for Sustainable Projectmanager, Urban Mobility for the state Simone Transport Planning of Hessen (Fachzentrum für simone.fedderke@ Fedderke/Jens Commission Nachhaltige Urbane fz-num.htai.de Vogel (Fachkommission Mobilität (FZ-NUM) des Verkehrsplanung) Landes Hessen) christian.holz- Prof. Dr.-Ing. TU Dortmund / FGSV rau@tu- Christian Holz-Rau dortmund.de gerd- Prof. Dr.-Ing. Axel TU Dresden / FGSV axel.ahrens@tu- Ahrens dresden.de Dr.-Ing. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker/ Rupprecht Consult, Projekt

Dr. Ralf Brand SUMPs-Up s.boehler@ruppre cht-consult.eu Dr.-Ing. Michael Planersocietät frehn@planersocie Frehn taet.de wolfgang.aichinger Wolfgang AGORA Verkehrswende @agora- Aichinger verkehrswende.de Verena Wagner Stadt Karlsruhe, PUM oder Stefan (Partnernship Urban verena.wagner@st Schwartz Mobility) pla.karlsruhe.de christian.specht@

Christian Specht Stadt Mannheim mannheim.de

Task Force meetings Six Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were the analysis of the state of SUMPs in Germany , the intersection of the agenda of individual ministries about the topic of urban mobility and later the integration of the SUMPs or VEPs into a national agenda.. The NTF was/is an important part of Prosperity in Germany. Members of the NTF met on a regular basis and discussed different topics regarding SUMP as well as the progress on developing a National SUMP Support Programme for Germany. All the relevant Ministries and other important stakeholders were/are part of the NTF, which made the discussions within the NTF purposeful and valuable in content. Different proposals for a SUMP support programme have been elaborated and discussed. Therefore, the NTF is an important platform for further promoting the topic of SUMP in Germany. As different relevant stakeholders are participating, the NTF in Germany can strongly influence the further processes regarding sustainable mobility planning in Germany. More information can be found in Appendix.

2.2 National SUMP network

124

The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. that would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed. For Germany, the "National Competence Network for Sustainable Urban Mobility" (NaKoMo) serves as a network for the broad field of sustainable mobility. The Difu, as NFP for Germany in the Prosperity project, contributed to the development of this network. NaKoMo was founded in April 2019 by the "Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure" (BMVI) and serves as a platform for all municipal issues relating to sustainable urban mobility. It provides information on existing funding opportunities for transport concepts, helps with the practical implementation of concepts and brings various participating partners into contact with each other. NaKoMo is supported by the BMVI and contributes to strengthening cooperation between the various federal levels in Germany and thus shaping future sustainable mobility.

125

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

126

As of July 2019 there are 17 German cities listed on the country website2, 42 more were connected to present their VEP (Verkehrsentwicklungspläne). Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

2.4 Other meetings and dissemination activities Several types of other activities took place to promote SUMPs at national level: Meetings: - National SUMP Promo Events - annual national SUMP conference in own country (national training weeks are excluded). - Third-party Events - events with active participation (with own original content): presentation, leading a workshop, lecturing Dissemination: - Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project - Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Regular blogging – In terms of the PROSPERITY project a blog is represented as a dedicated section on the respective city website, on a respective national SUMP platform website, or on the CIVITAS PROSPERITY website. Regular blogging on own experience with the whole SUMP process (both, planning and implementation) by city representatives, experts and NFP in their own local language to encourage follower cities in the own country to become active. - News and case studies - news and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework

This chapter is made up of extract from the SUMP Programme of Germany.

Many German municipalities have up to date transport plans in place but they are quite different in terms of quality and content. During the last decades, there has frequently been a discussion between different experts on the field of mobility planning about the need of a legal binding framework for mobility plans in Germany. But so far, there is no such legal framework in place. Experiences from other countries or regions in the European Union, which already have a legal framework for mobility planning, show, that it can be an important step in the development and

2 http://www.epomm.eu/endurance/index.php?id=2809&country=de 127 stability of SUM planning. A legal framework for SUMPs in Germany could also strengthen the cross-sectoral integration of SUM planning. A legal framework for SUM planning in Germany is therefore desirable. At the moment, different possible solutions and proposals for a legal framework are under discussion in the NTF. Different potentials, challenges and barriers for the process of developing a framework must be identified and discussed. The following four considerations are possible ways for setting a legal framework for SUMPs and have emerged during the discussion in the NTF:  Federal law on emissions  Climate protection law  Building code  Road traffic law

4 Financial Resources and Other Incentives This chapter is made up of extract from the SUMP Programme of Germany.

There are many different ways of getting financial support for the preparation and implementation of SUMPs for German municipalities, e.g. EU funds or other national and regional funds. But so far, there is no actual funding scheme only for sustainable mobility planning in Germany, as most of the funding schemes in Germany only cover single measures or parts of the plan or the process of developing a SUMP. For example, the Urban Development Funding Programme or the Experimental Housing and Urban Development Programme (ExWoSt) can be used for financing mobility related measures. A survey on different aspects of the SUMP process in German municipalities, which was conducted by Difu within the PROSPERITY project, also showed that low financial resources are a problem with which many municipalities are confronted while preparing or implementing a SUMP. Therefore, one of the most important aspects of the National SUMP Support Programme is to ensure access to financial resources. The results of this survey as well as the results from the NTF and coaching events within the PROSPERITY project in the city of Kassel also led directly to adjustments of the “National Climate Protection Initiative” (NKI) in 2018. These adjustments comprise easier accessible funding for mobility concepts and mobility related measures for German municipalities and apply since January 2019. Members of the Difu, as the NFP for PROSPERITY in Germany, were immediately integrated in the process of adjustment and supported the push for easier access to funding for mobility concepts and measures. From now on, the funding for additional staff as well as climate protection concepts is merged into one focal point of support. This focal point of support is intended for the creation of a Climate Protection Concept with a focus on sustainable mobility by a so-called Climate Protection Manager. The concept should be developed within two years and afterwards the implementation phase will be initiated within another two years. This adjusted programme is the only funding programme in Germany where not only the implementation of the SUMP is financially supported but also the development of the concept.

128

Furthermore, a federal financial support programme for the preparation of mobility plans is currently under discussion in the NTF. 5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome The PROSPERITY project led to a renewal of the "National Climate Protection Initiative". This renewal comprises easier accessible funding for mobility concepts and mobility related measures for German municipalities and applies since January 2019. Members of the Difu, as the NFP for PROSPERITY in Germany, were immediately integrated in the process of adjustment and supported the push for easier access to funding for mobility concepts and measures. Germany has a well-established urban transport planning framework that incorporates SUMPs (or equivalent document) with some support from the national/regional level; new support schemes were developed during the past years and other ones are still under preparation NTF helped to make SUMPs in Germany more popular and to show the importance of this topic. Relevant ministries as well as other stakeholders are working on possible supportive schemes for SUMPs. What worked well Difu organised National Events for the promotion of SUMPs, where different stakeholdes and employees of cities could learn important aspects about the SUM planning process. What did not work well The issue of Verkehrsentwicklungspläne (VEP) or Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMP) is still a topic for medium or big size cities in Germany. Despite the attempt to provide an appropriate agenda for small cities at the second annual national conference, it was hard to activate smaller municipalities. The lack of personnel and financial resources are main reasons for it. Continuation of the SUMP Programme Even after the end of the Prosperity project the NTF will keep on meeting. The Difu, as the NFP within Prosperity, will organise the meetings. Further meetings of the NTF are important to further the process of support for SUMP and all the participating members of the NTF agree on this point.

129

Appendix Task Force meetings Task Date City Country Number Main agenda Main 1st 2nd 3rd Force of agenda: Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Meetings attendees fill other Keywords Keywords Keywords  Presentation of Prosperity Inventory of Looking at Looking at project national possibilities examples of  Tasks of NTF within support for of support at NTF Prosperity project SUMPs in federal/state programmes in Germany level other project  Examples of NTF countries programmes from other Launch 2017- Berlin Germany 12 project countries Meeting 05  Discussion on the inventory of national support for SUMPs in Germany  Opportunities of support on federal/state level  Results of a survey on Definition of Clarifying the Discussion VEP/SUMP process in SUMP and role of the about funding German municipalities VEP in federal state opportunities Second 2017- Berlin Germany 10  Comparison between VEP Germany in SUMP for SUMPs in Meeting 10 and SUMP process Germany  Discussion on definition of VEP/SUMP

130

Task Date City Country Number Main agenda Main 1st 2nd 3rd Force of agenda: Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Meetings attendees fill other Keywords Keywords Keywords  Funding, coordination and moderation by the federal government: "Sustainable mobility for the city" fund  Funding opportunities from the point of view of the BUMB  Results of a survey on Discussion on Inventory of Looking at VEP/SUMP process in definition of SUMP/VEP examples for German municipalities SUMP and process in definitions of  Overview of definitions VEP in German SUMPs in and support for SUMP in Germany municipalities other national national programmes in programmes the EU  Quality assurance and Third 2018- Berlin Germany 10 further development of Meeting 06 SUMP  Discussion VEP/SUMP definition/core criteria, minimum and full status  Funding, coordination and moderation by the federal government: "Sustainable mobility for the city" fund

131

Task Date City Country Number Main agenda Main 1st 2nd 3rd Force of agenda: Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Meetings attendees fill other Keywords Keywords Keywords  Summarising overview on Proposal for a Looking at definitions and support of federal SUMP opportunities SUMP in national programme for promotion, programmes in the EU coordination  Proposal for a federal and Fourth 2018- SUMP programme moderation of Berlin Germany 10 the SUMP meeting 12  Opportunities for process by promotion, coordination the federal and moderation by the government federal government: "Sustainable mobility for the city" fund  SUMP Federal Looking at Discussion Programme: Overview of different on the legal the Federal Government- examples for anchoring of States-Programme for financial municipal Fifth 2019- Berlin Germany 12 Urban Development support transport meeting 04  Legal anchoring of schemes for planning municipal traffic planning mobility related measures in  Status of the SUMP 2.0 Germany Guideline project Discussion on Discussion Getting to  Proposal for a federal Sixth 2019- a proposal for on a proposal know the Berlin Germany 14 funding programme meeting 07 a federal state for a updated SUMP SUMP support promotion

132

Task Date City Country Number Main agenda Main 1st 2nd 3rd Force of agenda: Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Meetings attendees fill other Keywords Keywords Keywords  Proposal for an activation programme for programme Guidelines program SUMP SUMPs in for SUMPs in (SUMP 2.0) Germany Germany  Legal questions on municipal transport planning  Process for updating the SUMP Guidelines

133

National SUMP promo events Name of the Date Multipl City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event e-day er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / event attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) 1st annual event: The strategic 2017- Exchange of Strategic Awareness importance of no Berlin Germany 45 11 experience planning raising sustainable urban mobility plans

https://difu.de/vera nstaltungen/2018- 2018- 11-07/best-practice- Exchange of Strategic Awareness 2nd annual event: no Kassel Germany 25 bei-der-umsetzung- 11 von- experience planning raising mobilitaetsplaenen. html 2019- 3rd annual event: no Berlin Germany 06

134

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

Seminar für die oberste training/seminar/workshop 1 2018-04 yes no Dinkelsbühl Germany Führungsebene der Kommunen

conference 2 Urban Freight conference 2018-04 yes yes Bruxelles Belgium

meeting 3 annual meeting of Difus contribtors 2018-06 yes no Berlin Germany

Kommunal mobil (Conference on conference 4 2018-06 yes no Dessau Germany Urban Transport Transformation)

conference 5 Civitas Forum 2018 2018-09 yes yes Umea Sweden

Seminar Strategisches Wissen in der training/seminar/workshop 6 2018-11 yes no Cologne Germany Verkehrsplanung III Beteiligung bei kommunalen training/seminar/workshop 7 2019-04 yes no Berlin Germany Verkehrsprojekten

135

1 primary primary

seconda 2 primary primary secondary primary secondary secondary secondary ry

3 primary primary

4 primary primary primary primary primary

5 primary primary primary primary primary

6 primary primary

7 primary primary

136

Exchange of 1 30 active participation experience Exchange of 2 300 active participation experience

3 40 active participation Other

Exchange of 4 80 co-organiser experience Exchange of 5 370 active participation experience

6 20 organiser Capacity building

137

Dissemination Target groups

media

/ Name of media of / Name

iticians iticians and decision makers on

Pol level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Prospe inter prim rity poster Prosperity leaflet primary natio ary promo nal tion Prospe brochu prim rity natio Difu-Berichte primary re ary promo nal tion Der Überblick. Monatszeitschrift magazi des Städte und

ne Gemeindetages Mecklenburg- Vorpommern e.V.

138

Target groups

media

/ Name of media of / Name

iticians iticians and decision makers on

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link

Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. SUMP 2018 second prim natio https://difu.de/publ other Difu-Berichte primary primary inform ikationen/difu- -10 ary ary nal ation berichte-aktuell SUMP 2019 second prim natio https://difu.de/publ other Difu-Berichte primary primary inform ikationen/difu- -03 ary ary nal ation berichte-aktuell Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. https://difu.de/proj Prospe ekte/2016/prosperi websit Project website at rity natio ty-prosperity- primary e Difu promo nal through-innovation- tion and-promotion- of.html websit Project website at second prim Prospe regio http://www.stadt-

e The City of Kassel ary ary rity nal kassel.de/projekte/

139

Target groups

media

/ Name of media of / Name

iticians iticians and decision makers on

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link promo verkehr/infos/2402 tion 1/ Prospe e- inter Project website prim prim rity http://sump- newsle primary primary primary natio network.eu/news/# Prosperity ary ary promo tter nal c1031 tion Prospe e- inter Project website prim prim rity http://sump- newsle primary primary primary natio network.eu/news/# Prosperity ary ary promo tter nal c1033 tion http://sump- Prospe e- inter network.eu/news/si Project website prim prim rity ngle/?newsid=1092 newsle primary primary primary natio Prosperity ary ary promo &cHash=827780274 tter nal tion cfb863a125187f700 dc77f9

140

Target groups

media

/ Name of media of / Name

iticians iticians and decision makers on

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link http://sump- Prospe e- inter network.eu/news/si Project website prim prim rity ngle/?newsid=1111 newsle primary primary primary natio Prosperity ary ary promo &cHash=f8d637c85 tter nal tion 0035f2b35435d380 4056965 Prospe https://difu.de/projek te/2016/prosperity- websit Project website at rity natio primary prosperity-through- e Difu promo nal innovation-and- tion promotion-of.html

Regular blogging SUMP http://sump- City of the Month 2017 prim regio network.eu/cities- primary inform (Kassel) -09 ary nal countries/cities- ation countries/ News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ------

141

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Catalonia (Spain)

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV Responsible Co-Author: Miguel Mateos & Màrius Navazo

| gea21

Date: July 2019

Status: Final

142

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 144

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 144

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 144

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 145

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 147

2.4 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 148

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 148

4 FINANCING ...... 149

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 151

APPENDIX ...... 153

143

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (21) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (22) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (23) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (24) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

144

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email DIBA - Diputación de Barcelona [email protected] Mercè Taberna Chair (Provincial Government) t DIBA - Diputación de Barcelona Roger Torrell Member [email protected] (Provincial Government) Member/Facilitato [email protected] Màrius Navazo GEA21 r om [email protected] Miguel Mateos GEA21 Member om Generalitat de Catalunya (Regional irene.martin@genc Irene Martín Member Government) at.cat ATM Autoritat del Transport Metropolità de Lluis Alegre Member [email protected] Barcelona(Management authority for the Barcelona metropolitan region) AMB Área Metropolitana de Guillem Alsina Barcelona (Management authority for Member [email protected] the Barcelona metropolitan area)

Task Force meetings Three Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meetings were a preparation of National SUMP Programme, monitoring and evaluation scheme and methodological framework.

The creation of the TF was conditioned by the fact that there was a previous close relation between all parties involved. This eased its creation, but it is also true that its performance was a bit undermined by certain tendency to maintain the less formal and bilateral approach for communication between administrations over the broader and more institutional TF approach. Nevertheless, its formalization, as well as setting a clear goal and time-frame for the TF (updating the SUMP support programme within PROSPERITY) helped achieve the goal. The creation of working groups linked to the TF was of great help.

145

 facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed.

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network Xarxa Mobal Host of the network Web address Contact E-mail address Tel. of the network name number Diputación de Barcelona http://xarxamo Roger [email protected] 934.022.19 bal.diba.cat/m Torrell 5 - ext. obal/cat/home/ 37462 home.asp Membership Cities/regions Other institutions There is no formal membership to this network. It is open to please fill in if relevant /comment all municipalities in the Barcelona Region, accounting for 311

Since formal membership is not required it is difficult to have a clear idea of the impact of Xarxa Mobal. However the number of subscribers to its monthly e-bulletin can give an approximate idea to it. Currently there are 1.331 subscribers. Also, along 2018, the website accounted for 11.000 visitors, with 35.000 web pages visited.

146

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

The city activation strategy was in particular designed for cities to join national existing or newly established SUMPs networks. As these networks have been already established in most of Prosperity countries within Endurance project, city activation is not needed any more in countries where national SUMP networks work well. For the rest of countries it is recommended to use the principles of it. It is relevant especially in Croatia and Cyprus which were not Endurance partners. As of June 2019 there are 12 cities listed on the Spanish country website, three of which corresponds to Catalonia. Also the Metropolitan Área of Barcelona is listed (consisting of 36 municipalities). Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

147

3 Legislative framework Law 9/2003 on mobility in Catalonia defines the Urban Mobility Plans (UMPs) as the basic document for configuring sustainable mobility strategies at a municipal level. Its development is mandatory for all municipalities that, in accordance with local regulations or the corresponding master plan, must provide public transport services. In general, this means that every municipality of more than 50,000 inhabitants and the main municipality of each county are required to have a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP). In addition, all municipalities in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area with more than 20,000 inhabitants are also required to draw up a SUMP. The territorial scope of these plans is same as that of the municipality or, with the corresponding agreement of the relevant municipalities, that of several municipalities with an interdependent mobility scheme. The SUMPs must be updated every 6 years. From a hierarchical point of view, the SUMPs are subject to the National Mobility Guidelines (DNM, in local acronym), which act as a guiding framework for the application of mobility objectives in Catalonia as a whole, and the Mobility Master Plans (PDM, in local acronym), which make the territorial development of the DNMs a reality in the different areas into which it is divided. This hierarchical relationship means that the guidelines of the SUMPs must be aligned with the objectives of the PDMs in which they are framed, and that they must contribute to their

148 achievement. This has practical implications for defining their objectives and for their monitoring and evaluation. In short, this legislative framework draws a complex jurisdictional reality in which urban mobility is a fundamental competence of the town councils, but with direct bearing on a series of supra- municipal administrations, namely:  Department for Territory and Sustainability of the Generalitat de Catalunya (GENCAT)  Department for Roads and mobility of Diputació de Barcelona (DIBA)  Metropolitan Transport Authority of Barcelona (ATM), made up of 164 municipalities  Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (AMB) made up of 36 municipalities For its part, following the approval of the Mobility Law of Catalonia, Barcelona Provincial Council (DIBA) launched a programme to support the development of SUMPs, which provides financial support for their development, technical references and technical assistance during the process, as well as training for municipal technicians responsible for their implementation. Barcelona already has a legislative framework (facilitated by GENCAT) that quantitatively determines the scope of the SUMPs in Barcelona. There is also a support programme for SUMP development (offered by DIBA) that facilitates compliance with the specific objectives set by the Law. Therefore, there are no specific quantifiable objectives associated with the revision of DIBA's SUMP Support Programme, the updating of which is fundamentally aimed at qualitative aspects such as quality improvement and better SUMP monitoring, as reflected in the description of the general objectives.

4 Financing Traditionally, DIBA has provided financial support for the elaboration of SUMPs to those municipalities that request it through the so-called "Catalogue of services" of this organization (https://seuelectronica.diba.cat/tramits-ens/cataleg-de-serveis/default.asp, an on-line tool for the application and management of all types of services provided by DIBA). As in other territories with similar initiatives, the establishment of a stable framework of financial support has contributed significantly to the take up of SUMPs, with more and more municipalities having one (regardless of their obligatory nature). However, the SUMPs developed so far have not always managed to deploy their measures and meet the objectives with which they were drafted. This is often due to economic reasons. To help overcome this constraint, with this new SUMP Support Programme, DIBA will also provide financial support for the implementation of measures envisaged by the SUMPs.

Support for SUMP elaboration DIBA co-finances the elaboration of SUMPs in the municipalities of its territory. Interested municipalities can apply for this assistance, both for the elaboration of a new SUMPs and for the updating of existing ones. The level of co-financing varies according to the size of the municipality, according to these criteria:  Less than 1,000 inhabitants: exempt from the co-financing requirement (100% financing)

149

 1,000 - 5,000 inhabitants: 10% co-financing by the municipality  5,000 - 20,000 inhabitants: 20% co-financing by the municipality  20,000 - 50,000 inhabitants: 35% co-financing by the municipality  More than 50,000 inhabitants: 50% co-financing by the municipality

In DIBA's new SUMP support programme, this aid is maintained under the same conditions as in the past.

Support for the implementation of measures envisaged by SUMPs During 2018, DIBA has benefited from funds from the ERDP Operational Programme to provide financial support for the implementation of measures envisaged by SUMPs. As for the elaboration of the Plan, it is a co-financing scheme, up to a maximum of 50% of the cost of the measure, with a maximum limit of € 50,000. Measures have to be implemented within one year. It is, therefore, a scheme to finance measures of rapid implementation, which contribute to the visibility of the kind of changes pursued with the SUMP, and therefore strengthen the transforming strategy of the applicant municipality. Following the satisfactory assessment of the 2018 experience, within the framework of DIBA's new SUMP Support Programme, financial support to the implementation of measures will continue from 2019 on, now financed by DIBA's own funds. They are also processed through DIBA's "Catalogue of Services".

150

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome

Although promotion was already made before PROSPERITY and the project didn’t mean a significant change in this regard, the development of a SUMP Promo Programme provided some valuable outcomes, mostly through the creation of the Task Force.

The formalisation of cooperation prompted by the NTF contributes to a better coordination of stakeholders, making decision-making more efficient and, with it, improving the results of the different levels of mobility planning in Barcelona territory.

Roles distribution and responsibilities were already settled by the Catalonia Mobility Law. Hence there was no impact in this regard following PROSPERITY’s SUMP Promo Programme.

What worked well? Formalization of TF, as well as setting a clear goal and time-frame for the TF (updating the SUMP support programme within PROSPERITY) helped achieve the goal. The creation of working groups linked to the TF was of great help.

What did not work well? The fact that coordination between affected parties already existed before PROSPERITY (although based on non-formalised structures, whose main mechanism is the closeness and daily contact between the technicians responsible for each competent administration) made it difficult to “sell” the idea of the National Task Force meeting, which was initially perceived as unnecessary by some potential participants.

Continuation of the SUMP programme From a National perspective, DIBA is willing to maintain the NTF approach through the creation (in the medium/long term) of a "Mobility Forum” for Barcelona, in which the administrations with competences in mobility in Barcelona region periodically meet to discuss aspects such as: • Defining/updating of methodological approaches • New support needs for municipalities • Future challenges for mobility • Others From an International perspective, maintaining regular contacts with other HLG would be very helpful. On the one hand it would allow further discuss ways to improve quality of SUMPs. As well as will favour the exchange of experiences regarding the drivers and barriers encountered during the development of the SUMP support programmes elaborated within PROSPERITY.

Complementing the exchange at the HLG level with a programme for the exchange of experiences from first hand (i.e. exchange at the practitioner level), for instance, favouring the

151 participation of experts or practitioners from pioneering cities in workshops, seminars, etc. in the “importer” territory.

152

Appendix

Meeting SUMP Programme Second 2017- Barcelona Spain 6 Other Discussion on monitoring Other

Meeting 07 and evaluation scheme 2017- Barcelona Spain 4 Other Discussion on Other Third Meeting 09 methodological framework and ToR

153

Jornada Anual http://xarxamo DIBA "La calle bal.diba.cat/mo bal/cat/jornade Exchange of Capacity Awareness como espacio 2017-11 no Sabadell Spain 250 co-organiser s_diba/jornades experience building raising de movilidad y _diba.asp?jorna convivencia” da=mobilitat17 https://www.di ba.cat/web/carr Jornada Anual eteres-locals-i- Exchange DIBA: "El repte mobilitat/-/xiv- Strategic Capacity 2018-10 no Barcelona Spain 200 jornada-tecnica- co-organiser of de la planning building de-mobilitat-el- experience multimodalitat" repte-de-la- intermodalit-2

CONAMA http://www.con Exchange of Strategic Awareness 2018-11 yes Madrid Spain 100 ama2018.org/w co-organiser 2018: PMUS y experience planning raising eb/generico.ph

154

155

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event training/seminar/work 1 Training "Mobility management" 2016-10 yes no Barcelona Spain shop training/seminar/work 2 Training “Sustainable mobility planning” 2017-06 yes no Barcelona Spain shop training/seminar/work 3 Training "Mobility management" 2017-10 yes no Barcelona Spain shop training/seminar/work 4 Training “Sustainable mobility planning” 2018-04 yes no Barcelona Spain shop training/seminar/work 5 Seminar "Mobility and health" 2018-10 no no Barcelona Spain shop

156

1 primary

2 primary

3 primary

4 primary

5 primary

157

http://xarxamobal.diba.cat/mobal/ca 1 20 Capacity building t/formacio/formacio.asp?any=18 http://xarxamobal.diba.cat/mobal/ 2 20 Capacity building cat/formacio/formacio.asp?any=18 http://xarxamobal.diba.cat/mobal/ca 3 20 Capacity building t/formacio/formacio.asp?any=18 http://xarxamobal.diba.cat/mobal/ 4 20 Capacity building cat/formacio/formacio.asp?any=18

5 25 Strategic planning Capacity building

158

Dissemination Target groups

etworks etworks and

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms n media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Prosp sec flye PROSPERITY 2017 primar secon secon erity nation ond r Brochure -11 y dary dary promo al ary tion Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Article “SUMP Conference and 2017

PROSPERITY -04 Exchange” Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. SUM we sec seco seco seco primar primar secon secon P region bsit Xarxa Mobal ond ndar ndar ndar http://xarxamobal.dib y y dary dary inform al e ary y y y a.cat/mobal/cat/home ation /home.asp

159

Target groups

etworks etworks and

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms n media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link soc SUM https://twitter.com/X sec seco seco seco ial primar primar secon secon P region arxaMOBAL?ref_src=t Twitter ond ndar ndar ndar wsrc%5Etfw&ref_url= me y y dary dary inform al ary y y y http%3A%2F%2Fxarxa dia ation mobal. Regular blogging https://www.faceboo k.com/Gea21- 1097373263625630/? Prosp sec seco seco seco eid=ARAspF18YbNDTJ primar primar secon secon erity nation Facebook ond ndar ndar ndar wohW03Wn_SqGufM y y dary dary promo al hB4kyc5TRkVBQWrGt ary y y y tion YvYXJL5Wm7XedLJqW Qql5CK44qg1- Zezg9&fref=tag

News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

Knowledge seco http://sump- primar primar secon prim secon Prosp nation network.eu/news/sin ndar Exchange Session on y y dary ary dary erity al gle/?newsid=999&c SUMPs in the y Hash=1f372a0802a

160

Target groups

etworks etworks and

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms n media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Barcelona Region promo a8dbaa89bc18694e a7f27 - tion Prosp http://sump- The multimodal seco network.eu/news/sin primar primar secon prim secon erity nation gle/?newsid=1090&c challenge under ndar y y dary ary dary promo al Hash=a50d7cbde42 discussion in y 77e1a6cf7a0975a88 Barcelona tion c2a3

161

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Croatia

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Nebojša Kalanj | Koprivnica

Date: August 2019

Status: Final

162

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 164

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 164

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 164

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 166

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 167

2.4 COACHINGS ...... FOUT! BLADWIJZER NIET GEDEFINIEERD.

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 168

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 169

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 169

4 FINANCING ...... 169

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 171

APPENDIX ...... 172

163

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (25) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (26) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (27) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (28) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

164

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email City of Koprivnica NFP [email protected] Nebojša Kalanj Maja Balaško City of Koprivnica Project manager [email protected] Ivan Šimunec Ministry of transport expert [email protected] Ante Klečina Train alliance expert [email protected] Nino Štubljak City of Koprivnica expert [email protected] Ivana Ledisnki City of Koprivnica dissemination [email protected] Cvetkovic expert Lidija Pavic [email protected] Odraz Director Rogosic Predrag Brlek University North Prof. [email protected] City of Dubrovnik Senior advisor [email protected] Natasa Miric development and project agency DURA manager

Task Force meetings

Four Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meetings were the preparation of National SUMP Programme which is the main output of the Task Force's work. The structure of the NTF was successful because it consisted of individuals and organisation that were very devoted to a much stronger implementation of sustainable mobility measures in Croatia. The main focus was on higher educational organisations, NGOs and individuals that are active in sustainable development. The members used their won expertise and influence in the work of the group. Potential weakness of the group is potentially the lack of representatives of consultancy firms that could act as felicitators of the outputs. The number of participants at the meetings varied and the location of the meetings was different also, mainly because of the different locations where the experts are located.

165

2.2 National SUMP network

The Croatian SUMP network consists form the institutions that took part at the Croatian SUMP training that was held during March 2018. The institutions present at the event were actively involved in the training event and therefore joined the community of cities that are interested in promoting sustainable urban mobility planning. The network consist of 10 cities and three organisations.

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network Croatian national SUMP network Host of the Web address of the Contact E-mail address Tel. network network name number City of http://www.kc-sump.eu/hr/ Nebojša nebojsa.kalanj@kopri 385914446 Koprivnica, Kalanj vnica.hr 669 University North Koprivnica Membership Cities/regions Other institutions City of Rijeka University North City of Dubrovnik Odraz City of Velika Gorica Ministry of transport City of Slavonski Brod City of Opatija City of Pazin City of Rovinj City of Koprivnica City of Jastrebarsko City of Zagreb

166

2.3 Cities and their activation

Interest of cities in SUMP and their involvement into the project is the key success factor. Specific tool for cities activation was developed in the Endurance project and is described in Roadmaps of the Endurance project (http://www.epomm.eu/endurance/index.php?id=2833, http://www.epomm.eu/docs/2250/D3_4_ENDURANCE_Report.pdf). A modified diagram below offers the guidance for categorisation of cities (interested/uninterested in SUMP and advanced/less advanced in SUMP).

interested in interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement 1 2

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

167

2.4 Coaching’s

Three coaching’s were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 19-20/03/2018 SUMP preparation process Dubrovnik 5 and parking Coaching 2 9-10/101/2018 SUMP tender preparation, Dubrovnik 5 SUMP's relation to other strategies and to short-term actions Coaching 3 14/12/2018 Good practice from other Dubrovnik 5 cities

The main impact of coaching’s was increasing the staff capacity of the City of Dubrovnik staff that was needed in order to prepare the city administration for the development and uptake of the City of Dubrovnik SUMP.

2.5 Training(s)

The training was organised in March 2018 in cooperation with the Slovenian partner. The reason for organising the joint training is the practicality of this type of endeavour, since it is much easier to gather this type of lecturers in one place and because the language barriers are not so emphasized. There was one training that was spread across five days. The location of the training was the City of Rovinj, a settlement in Istria that was both suitable for Croatian and Slovenian partners. The main impact of the training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in Croatian cities.

Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2019-03 – 19-23 Achieving political and internal 18 24 Training buy-in with support from ENU How does SUMP mesh with statutory land use plans

Communication and stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP - measures Use of public space

168

2.6 Other meetings and dissemination activities

Dissemination activities in the scope of this project were regular and had the effect of popularizing sustainable urban mobility planning in urban areas. The achievements and activities of the project were regularly promoted on the City of Koprivnica web page (www.koprivnica.hr) that would serve to inform the general population on the regional level and many of the news were disseminated on the CIVINET web page (https://civinet-slohr.eu/) which were focused on the national level. Another important channel was the web site of the Croatian association of cities (https://www.udruga-gradova.hr/).

3 Legislative framework

Croatia has adopted a number of policy documents that deal with the promotion of sustainable means of transport. The most important document is the Transport strategy of the Republic of Croatia for the period 2017 – 2030 where sustainability is an important factor, but not through the promotion of sustainable urban mobility plans, more with the promotion of particular measures that define sustainable transport; public transport, e-mobility and cycling. Other important documents (Strategies, policies etc…) that are supporting sustainable mobility are as follows; Republic of Croatia sustainable development strategy Republic of Croatia energy strategy Low carbon development strategy Link between all of these strategies is that they promote individual sustainability measures, like cycling, e-mobility, pedestrian traffic, public transport and similar but not the need for a single planning document that would incorporate all of these elements. In this moment, there is no intention for the development of an Act on sustainable mobility that would serve as a basis for the further development of SUM planning documents.

4 Financing

Financial resources for the implementation of sustainable mobility measures and planning are present in a number of supporting schemes that include EU and national sources. These are important elements of encouraging sustainable mobility measures, especially in the context of promoting sustainable mobility and climate change adaptation and mitigation policies and planning. Availability of financing sustainable mobility measures and planning documents is the key for successful promotion these activities. Croatian cities and municipalities have a number of possibilities for financing these. EU funds have been available, mainly through the

169 operational program “Competition and cohesion”, instruments of European territorial cooperation and direct EU funding programmes. Major instrument that Croatia has been using in supporting sustainable mobility is the Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI), funded mostly from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) mechanism where the all of the ITI areas, cities over 50000 inhabitants have given the possibility of developing sustainable planning documents and the financing of sustainable mobility measures. In the next programming period form 2021. – 2028. the number of ITI areas will increase, including cities with at least 35000 inhabitants, therefore increasing the possibility of fund more cities in Croatia. European territorial cooperation is an important tool for cities and municipalities that wish to fund SUM planning documents or measures deriving from these documents. These include following programs; Cross boarder cooperation program, Transnational cooperation program and Transregional cooperation program. Available programs for cross boarder cooperation are:

INTERREG V-A Italy Croatia 2014.-2020., INTERREG V-A Hungary Croatia 2014.-2020., INTERREG V-A Slovenia Croatia 2014.-2020. INTERREG IPA Croatia Bosnia and Herzegovina Montenegro 2014.-2020., INTERREG IPA Croatia Serbia 2014.-2020.,

Transregional cooperation programs: ESPON, INTERACT III INTERREG VC URBACT.

Transnational cooperation programmes:

INTERREG V-B Mediteran 2014.-2020., INTERREG V-B Dunav 2014.-2020., INTERREG V-B ADRION 2014.-2020. INTERREG Central Europe 2014.-2020.

National sources of financing include the funding from the Croatian fund for energy efficiency and environmental protection where funds are available for funding mostly e-mobility measures.

170

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome

One of the main outcomes of the SUMP Promo program was the increased interest of local communities in sustainable urban mobility planning. Also, the focus on transport professionals that should carry the activities of promoting sustainable mobility in cities and encouraging them to start with these kinds of activities was very important. The Prosperity projects and the activities that were held in Croatia gathered the interest of many Croatian cities and municipalities. The dissemination work that went through the above- mentioned dissemination channels got the main message of the SUMP idea closer to them. Unfortunately, the Ministry did not participate/take a leading role. The focus of the ministry at the start of the Prosperity project were strategic documents that were started in before the start of the Prosperity project and that were focused on regional planning. These documents were done under the EU programming period 2007 – 2014. And were an obligation set by the Croatian state and the EU. This refers particularly on regional mobility planning documents. Most of the staff working on strategic documents have been occupied by working on these documents. One more reason why the ministry could not take the lead in these activities was the fact that Croatia, as the youngest member of EU, had a hard transition period because it was involved in conducting obligations from the 2007 – 2014, planning for the 2014 – 2020 period and conducting the large-scale project that were in development. The lack of compulsory regulations set by the EU regarding sustainable urban development is making it hard to implement sustainable urban mobility measures and planning documents in the EU countries. This is especial visible in new EU countries, like Croatia, that still struggle with the first years in the EU and where the lack of expertise is evident. The best way to continue the development/implementation of the SUM program is to connect all the interested stakeholders in this process, from the government level to the business sector, in order to develop a critical mass of stakeholders that is needed for the successful implementation of the program.

171

Appendix

Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main agenda Main 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of agenda: fill Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees other / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Exchange Launch 2017- Preparation of National Awareness Strategic Koprivnica Croatia 6 of Meeting 06 SUMP Programme raising planning experience Exchange Second 2017- Preparation of National Awareness Capacity Zagreb Croatia 4 of Meeting 09 SUMP Programme raising building experience Exchange Exchange 2018- Preparation of National Strategic Third Meeting Zagreb Croatia 7 of of 05 SUMP Programme planning experience experience Exchange Exchange 2018- Preparation of National Strategic 4th meeting Koprivnica Croatia 4 of of 12 SUMP Programme planning experience experience

172

National SUMP promo events Name of the Date Multiple- City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event day event er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) Annual national Capacity Awareness Exchange of 2018-12 yes Zagreb Croatia 40 co-organiser SUMP building raising experience conference Annual national Capacity Awareness Strategic 2019-05 yes Koprivnica Croatia 40 co-organiser SUMP building raising planning conference Annual co-organiser Capacity Awareness Strategic national building raising planning 2019-06 yes Rijeka Croatia 31 SUMP conference

173

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

training/seminar/workshop 1 Exchange of experience workshop 2017-03 3 Yes Dubrovnik Croatia

174

Dissemination Target groups

kers on

/ Name of media of / Name

vate sectors stakeholders sectors vate

Politicians Politicians and decision ma level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General Pri professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Prospe seco seco Prosperity prim prim second second rity nation flyer 2018-02 primary primary primary ndar ndar flyer ary ary ary ary promo al y y tion Prospe seco seco Prosperity prim prim second second rity nation Poster 2018-02 primary primary primary ndar ndar poster ary ary ary ary promo al y y tion Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content.

Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content.

Regular blogging

175

Target groups

kers on

/ Name of media of / Name

vate sectors stakeholders sectors vate

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

176

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Hungary

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Balázs Kozák| Mobilissimus

Date: July 2019

Status: Final

177

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 179

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 179

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 179

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 181

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 183

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 184

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 184

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 185

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 185

4 FINANCING ...... 186

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 187

APPENDIX ...... 188

178

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (29) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (30) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (31) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (32) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

179

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email

Gábor Sztanics Ministry of Finance head of TF Csordás Beáta Ministry of Finance Iványi Katalin Ministry of Finance Katona Zsuzsanna Ministry of Finance Erika Oskó Hungarian State Treasury Dr. Miklós Oláh Municipality of Szeged Ministry for Innovation and

Szabolcs Simon Technology Bálint Madarász- Ministry for Innovation and

Losonczy Technology András Ekés Mobilissimus Ltd. Balázs Kozák Mobilissimus Ltd. Antal Gertheis Mobilissimus Ltd. head of TF Miklós Marton Ministry of Agriculture Ministry for Innovation and Miklós Berencsi Technology Ministry for Innovation and Szilárd Kajtár Technology Borbélyné Szabó Ministry for Innovation and

Ágnes Technology Ministry for Innovation and Mészáros Imre Technology Ministry for Innovation and Sándor Siliga Technology Transport Research Institute Albert Gábor (KTI) Transport Research Institute Álmos Virág (KTI) Transport Research Institute Balázs Ács (KTI) Transport Research Institute András Munkácsy (KTI) Transport Research Institute Ödön Végvári (KTI)

180

Name Organisation Function Email Martin Simon Ministry of Interior Alexandra Dobos Ministry of Interior Róza Számadó Ministry of Interior Karola Bába Ministry of Interior BKK Centre for Budapest László Kerényi Transport BKK Centre for Budapest Tünde Hajnal Transport BKK Centre for Budapest Máté Lénárt Transport László Sill Prime Minister’s Office Tamás Dömötör Prime Minister’s Office Budapest University of Attila Aba Technology and Economics

Task Force meetings Six Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were the setting of a national SUMP supporting programme for the next EU programming period in the Hungary and finding responsible partners at each ministry, because now the SUMP has no distinct responsible person for sustainable urban mobility planning. The main output of the Task Force's work is the SUMP Programme and the commitment to the Task Force to continue its work beyond the PROSPERITY project e.g. updating the National SUMP guidelines based on the SUMP 2.0 2.2 National SUMP network The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment).

181

The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network Magyar CIVINET Host of the Web address of the Contact E-mail address Tel. network network name number Mobilissimu http://civitas.eu/civinet/ma Antal gertheis@mobilissim +36-30- s gyar-civinet Gertheis us.hu 653-1705 Membership Cities/regions Other institutions Budapest district 14 Zugló BIOKOM City of Debrecen BKK Centre for Budapest Transport City of Eger Budapest University of Technology and Economics, City of Esztergom Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle City of Hévíz Engineering City of Hódmezővásárhely Miskolc Cycling Association Pons Danubii European Grouping of Territorial City of Kaposvár Cooperation Municipality of Szabadegyháza Sund Magyarország Ltd. City of Szarvas Metropolitan Research Institute City of Szeged City of Székesfehérvár City of Zalaegerszeg

In June 2019 - 12 cities were Magyar CIVINET network members. Since the PROSPERITY project started (September 2016), the total number of Hungarian network members increased from 6 to 12 members and other supporting members grew by 1 to 7.

182

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

The city activation strategy was in particular designed for cities to join national existing or newly established SUMPs networks. As these networks have been already established in most of Prosperity countries within Endurance project, city activation is not needed any more in countries where national SUMP networks work well. For the rest of countries it is recommended to use the principles of it. It is relevant especially in Croatia and Cyprus which were not Endurance partners. In summer 2019 there are 14 Hungarian cities listed on the country website, however not all are members of the national SUMP network. Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

183

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 2018-01-24 Communication and 1 9 stakeholder involvement Coaching 2 2018-06-17 SUMP objectives, measures, 1 11 and the set of monitoring and evaluation indicators Coaching 3 2019-01-30 Sustainable Urban Logistic 1 10 Plans

The main impact of coachings was to train the members of the city hall while implementing their 1st SUMP on active and continuous communication, to monitor and evaluate their implementation progress and to look ahead and deal more intensively with urban logistics in every day operation and to incorporate them into the SUMP revision that is due in few years.

2.5 Training(s) One regular four-day training for was organised in the project city of Szeged for the Hungarian. Another one-day extra training took place in Budapest following the 2nd national promo event. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2018-06-04 - 07 Communication and stakeholder 14 26 Training involvement of the new SUMP / measures Urban Transport Roadmaps tool

Monitoring and evaluation

Freight transport (city logistics)

Extra training 2018-11-21 Political buy-in 10 17 The main impact of the first training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in 14 cities that have SUMP or for those that still haven’t had any. The second training attracted 10 cities and was focused preferably on one specific topics to help the municipal staff members to transfer well the message about the importance of the sustainable mobility to the decision- makers.

184

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework Sustainable urban mobility planning, as a mode of planning is currently not defined in Hungarian regulations. In the Hungarian context there are predecessors of sustainable urban mobility plans, although they are different in different cities. One of those predecessors is the transport concept that cities could create as a policy connected to the urban development concept in accordance with Act XXI of 1996 on Regional Development and Regional Planning and its implementing legislation. Compared to the transport concept, the sustainable urban mobility plan has a different focus (focusing on the people, residents instead of infrastructure and traffic). It is created as a result of a wide-spread participatory process, which requires more time. Another difference is the assessment and prioritization of the project proposals based also on cost- benefit aspects, resulting in a concrete action plan. By definition, the sustainable urban mobility plan is created for functional urban areas. In many cities (especially in smaller towns), however, there have been no predecessors to strategic planning in the area of transport for a long time.

185

4 Financing The current direction of the SUMP National Task Force is to establish a roadmap and incorporate the SUMP financing into the 2021-27 programming period in order to finance SUMP update for higher quality, financing of measures to implement the plans, and monitoring and evaluation activities too. Providing for the Financial Sources of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

The following proposals can be made in connection with the financial sources of planning:  Calls before the beginning of the next EU programming cycle (even by using the possible remaining funds from the current cycle) dedicated to sustainable urban mobility planning (not competing with infrastructural investments), or directly at the very beginning of the next 7-year cycle (1,5-2 years), separated in time from the infrastructural developments to be planned. o The quantity of available funds can depend on the size of the city and the size of the surrounding functional urban area or micro-region. o Cities with existing sustainable urban mobility plans should be provided with funding for the regular revision of the existing plan, and not for the creation of new plans.  Offering extra points in the assessment guidelines of other relevant infrastructural grants for local governments, if they apply for the creation of a sustainable urban mobility plan in addition to the main activity, or if they have an up-to-date sustainable urban mobility plan. The Role of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans in the Financing of the Implementation of Measures

The following proposals can be made in connection with the financing of and incentives for implementation:  Existing and up-to-date sustainable urban mobility plan as a prerequisite for the receiving of EU or national funds.  A proper chronology should be established for the planning of the sustainable urban mobility plan (strategy) and the projects, so that they can be built upon one another. The grant-based creation and the revision of sustainable urban mobility plans should precede the selection and the detailed preparation of the projects to be implemented. It is essential that these are coordinated within the bodies preparing the calls, for instance between the body responsible for sustainable urban mobility planning and the ministry responsible for the national budget. Accordingly: o Planning should fit into the process of urban development planning. o Before the beginning of the next EU programming cycle (even by using the possible remaining funds from the current cycle), or directly at the very beginning of the next 7-year cycle (in the first one or two years) a separate call should be made for co-financing sustainable urban mobility planning (see the sub-chapter above). Since in the beginning of the cycle the selection of projects is usually not completed yet, the task is not to ground projects in the preparation or implementation phase, and therefore, the relevant methodology and the desired quality can be better guaranteed. It is also easier and faster to prepare the call, compared to more complex and bigger projects.

186

The local governments should be informed from the beginning that existing and up-to-date sustainable urban mobility plans will be the prerequisite to the future support for the measures. It is advisable to make the call open for the entire programming cycle in order to provide for the creation of new sustainable urban mobility plans and the regular revision of existing plans. o The publication of calls for infrastructural projects is proposed to be conducted only afterwards. When making decisions about the funding of projects, it is advisable to consider the content of the sustainable urban mobility plan, but at least its existence should be a prerequisite for the granting of funds. Therefore, the implementation of the projects can be realized in the second half of the programming cycle. (Projects of national significance do not have to be based on SUMPs, but on national strategies; for the SUMPs they are to be regarded as inputs.) o Instead of two calls built on one another, it is also possible to make a two-step call as defined above (first step: sustainable urban mobility plan; second step: detailed preparation and implementation of the project).

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome In Hungarian conditions the main outcome of the project is creation of National Task Force, interest of its members to work behind the PROSPERITY project and elaboration of National SUMP Programme. Due to the training and national SUMP promo events (and Magyar CIVINET events) the PROSPERITY project contributed to increase the knowledge of SUMPs among Hungarian cities which were in different levels of SUMP preparation, elaboration or implementation. The NTF brought together many relevant ministries to one table to discuss how the government could support local governments. The draft version of the National SUMP Programme was elaborated, the ways to put into practice are under investigation. What worked well? NTF was active and all participating ministries were willing to find ways to promote SUMP and measures for improvement the mobility situation in Hungarian cities. They ideas have been involved in the draft National SUMP programme during the co-creation process. What did not work well? Municipal experts have very limited capacities to participate such events. Moreover, the decision-makers do no always support them. Less new citites were engaged during the project, however, the ones got engaged are really devoted. Continuation of the SUMP promotion programme Promotion of the SUMP topic will continue beyond the PROSPERITY project, promotion activities are planned in SUMP Programme, all members of NTF are willing to continue to work regardless the end of the project.

187

Appendix

Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main agenda Main agenda: fill 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of other Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Launch 2017- Preparation of National Strategic Exchange of Budapest Hungary 7 Meeting 10 SUMP Programme planning experience

Second 2018- Preparation of National Strategic Exchange of Budapest Hungary 7 Meeting 04 SUMP Programme planning experience

Third Meeting 2018- Preparation of National Strategic Exchange of Budapest Hungary 14 10 SUMP Programme planning experience

4th meeting 2019- Preparation of National Strategic Exchange of Budapest Hungary 12 02 SUMP Programme planning experience

5th meeting 2019- Preparation of National Strategic Exchange of Budapest Hungary 8 03 SUMP Programme planning experience 6th meeting Progressing with 2019- bringing the National Strategic Exchange of Budapest Hungary 6 06 SUMP Programme to planning experience an official level

188

1st https://mobili Exchange of PROSPERITY ssimus.hu/hir experience workshop - ek/beszamolo Capacity Awareness 2017-10 no Budapest Hungary 23 organiser Magyar -elso- building raising CIVINET prosperity- meeting workshoprol https://mobili ssimus.hu/hir 2nd ek/konferenci a-integralt- PROSPERITY Exchange of Awareness 2018-11 no Budapest Hungary 57 kozossegi- organiser SUMP experience raising kozlekedessze conference rvezesrol-es- sump- szakmai-nap https://mobili 3rd ssimus.hu/hir ek/3- PROSPERITY Exchange of Awareness 2019-03 no Budapest Hungary 49 prosperity- organiser SUMP experience raising sump- conference szakmai- konferencia

189

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

training/seminar/workshop 1 Exchange of experience workshop 2017-10 no no Budapest Hungary

training/seminar/workshop 2 8th Magyar Civinet Meeting 2017.11.22. no no Budapest Hungary

training/seminar/workshop 3 9th Magyar Civinet Meeting 2018.04.18. no no Székesfehérvár Hungary

training/seminar/workshop 4 10th Magyar Civinet Meeting 2018.05.29. no no Budapest Hungary

training/seminar/workshop 5 11th Magyar Civinet Meeting 2018.10.09. no no Szeged Hungary

conference 6 City Walk conference 2019.03.25-26. yes yes Oradea Romania conference 7 Austrian Cycling Summit 2019.05.27-29. no yes Graz Austria conference 8 Best Municipal Practice Programme 2019.06.28 no no Gödöllő Hungary Closing conference

190

1 N/A primary secondary primary secondary N/A N/A N/A N/A

2 secondary primary secondary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3 secondary primary secondary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

4 secondary primary secondary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

5 secondary primary secondary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

6 primary primary secondary secondary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

7 secondary primary secondary primary N/A N/A primary N/A N/A

8 primary secondary secondary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

191

1 http://civitas.eu/event/magyar- organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Awareness raising civinet-8-talalkozoja 2 http://civitas.eu/event/magyar- organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Awareness raising civinet-9-talalkozoja 3 http://civitas.eu/event/magyar- organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Awareness raising civinet-10-talalkozoja 4 https://civitas.eu/event/magyar -civinet-11-talalkozoja-okos- organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Awareness raising varosok-smart-mobilitas 5 https://civitas.eu/event/magyar organiser Capacity building Exchange of experience Awareness raising -civinet-11-talalkozoja-okos- varosok-smart-mobilitas 6 http://www.interreg- active participation Exchange of Capacity building danube.eu/news-and- experience events/project-news/3896 7 https://www.klimaaktiv.at/mobilit active participation Awareness raising Exchange of experience aet/radfahren/radgipfel/Radgipfe l_2019.html 8 http://moszlap.hu/hu/hir/legjobb- active participation Awareness raising Other onkormanyzati-gyakorlatok- program-zarokonferencia

192

Dissemination Target groups

orks orks and

/ Name of media of / Name

equency (if applies) (if equency

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms netw media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage Fr exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project

Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. newsp apers Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. http://civitas.eu e- Magyar seco second /news/magyar- newsle CIVINET 2017-10 primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ary civinet-hirlevel- tter Newsletter y #9 9-szam https://civitas.e e- Magyar seco second u/news/magyar newsle CIVINET 2018-02 primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ary -civinet-hirlevel- tter Newsletter y #10 10-szam

193

Target groups

orks orks and

/ Name of media of / Name

equency (if applies) (if equency

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms netw media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage Fr exists) (if Link https://civitas.e e- Magyar seco second u/news/magyar newsle CIVINET 2018-04 primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ary -civinet-hirlevel- tter Newsletter y #11 11-szam https://civitas.e e- Magyar seco second u/news/magyar newsle CIVINET 2018-07 primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ary -civinet-hirlevel- tter Newsletter y #12 12-szam e- Magyar https://civitas.eu seco newsle CIVINET second /news/magyar- 2018-09 primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A tter Newsletter ary civinet-hirlevel- y #13 13-szam e- Magyar 2018-11 second primary primary seco N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A https://civitas.eu newsle CIVINET ary ndar /news/magyar- tter Newsletter y civinet-hirlevel- #14 14-szam

194

Target groups

orks orks and

/ Name of media of / Name

equency (if applies) (if equency

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms netw media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage Fr exists) (if Link online CIVITAS 2018-12 primary primary primary seco seco second seco second seco https://civitas.eu newsp website ndar ndar ary ndar ary ndar /news/civitas- aper prosperity- news y y y y innovation-brief-

dockless-bike- sharing- regulation-and- its-relation-sump e- CIVITAS 2019-01 primary primary second prim seco second seco N/A N/A https://mailchi.m newsle MOVE ary ary ndar ary ndar p/civitas/civitas- tter move- Newsletter y y 35 newsletter- 35?e=[UNIQID] e- CIVITAS 2019-07 primary primary second prim seco second seco N/A N/A newsle MOVE ary ary ndar ary ndar tter Newsletter y y 37

195

Target groups

orks orks and

/ Name of media of / Name

equency (if applies) (if equency

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms netw media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage Fr exists) (if Link

Regular blogging Pro https://mobilissi spe nati mus.hu/projekt Mobilissimu prim prim prima second rity 2018-02 primary primary primary N/A N/A ona ek/prosperity s website ary ary ry ary pro l mot ion News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ------

196

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Lithuania

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Vaiva Ramanauskienė | ECAT

Date: June 2019

Status: Final

197

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 199

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 199

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 199

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 200

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 202

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 203

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 203

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 205

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 205

4 FINANCING ...... 206

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 207

APPENDIX ...... 209

198

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (33) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (34) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (35) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (36) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and

199

implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Jonas Lithuanian Transport Ministry chief specialist/ Damidavičius SUMP Jonas.Damidaviciu responsible [email protected] Vaiva ECAT project Ramanauskienė coordinator [email protected] James j.mcgeever@luxmo McGeever LuxMobility/ECAT expert bility.eu Vida Ablingienė vida.ablingiene@ls Association of Local Authorities LT councelor a.lt Aksana aksana.zacharova Zacharova Jonava Municipality specialist @jonava.lt Lina Gelaziene ECAT expert [email protected] Mantas mantas.petrauskas Petrauskas Jonava Municipality specialist @jonava.lt Povilas Beisys povilas.beisys@jon Jonava Municipality specialist ava.lt Živilė Zareckaitė zivile.zareckaite@j Jonava Municipality specialist onava.lt

Task Force meetings Three Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meetings were a preparation of National SUMP Programme. The main output of the Task Force's work is the National SUMP Programme. During the last Task Force meeting was decided to integrate Task force into already existing National SUMP Commission which will continue work related to the National SUMP Programme beyond the PROSPERITY project.

200

 be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network Darnaus Judumo Mieste Planai Host of the Web address of the Contact E-mail address Tel. network network name number Lithuanian https://sumin.lrv.lt/lt/veiklos Jonas Jonas.Damidavicius +370 Transport -sritys/darnaus-judumo- Damidavi @sumin.lt 52392906 ministry mieste-planai čius Membership Cities/regions Other institutions Vilnius Kaunas Klaipėda Šiauliai Panevėžys Alytus Marijampolė Utena Jonava Mažeikiai Kėdainiai Telšiai Visaginas Palanga Neringa Birštonas Druskininkai Tauragė Plungė Trakai

201

In June 2019 twenty Lithuanian cities developed their SUMP’s and were involved in SUMP network which is coordinated by LT Transport Ministry. Since the PROSPERITY project started (September 2016), the total number of Lithuanian SUMP network members increased from 13 to 20 members with almost 1,5 mln. Inhabitants, which is about 50% of total inhabitants of Lithuania. 2.3 Cities and their activation Interest of cities in SUMP and their involvement into the project is the key success factor. Specific tool for cities activation was developed in the Endurance project and is described in Roadmaps of the Endurance project (http://www.epomm.eu/endurance/index.php?id=2833, http://www.epomm.eu/docs/2250/D3_4_ENDURANCE_Report.pdf). A modified diagram below offers the guidance for categorisation of cities (interested/uninterested in SUMP and advanced/less advanced in SUMP). interested in interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement 1 2

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

202

Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 20 11 2017 Transforming the urban Jonava 13 mobility with internal and external buy-in and ownership. Coaching 2 29 05 2018 Public transport. Promotion and Jonava 11 planning public transport in the city and planning common e- ticket system with neighbouring city. Coaching 3 18 04 2019 Sustainable mobility measures Jonava 6 and Jonava case.

The main impact of coaching was increased understanding of SUMP within various stakeholders and better communication within city administration departments on mobility issues. Also Prosperity project initiated discussions toward common e-ticket system for public transport with neighbouring city Kaunas.

2.5 Training(s) One regular five-day training was organised in the city of Kaunas. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2017-11 - 20–24 How does SUMP mesh with 13 24 Training statutory land use plans Communication and stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP - measures Urban Transport Roadmaps tool

Monitoring and evaluation

The main impact of the training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in 13 Lithuanian cities: 8 of them were more advanced in SUMP, for others this topic was quite new.

203

204

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework This chapter is made up of extracts from the Lithuanian Programme for Development of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. During the recent years of intense and successful SUM planning development in Lithuania, it has been recognized that the key factor of the breakthrough of SUM planning is the legal framework. MoTC is responsible for SUM planning in Lithuania and in 2015, Minister of MoTC has adopt National SUMP Guidelines, which recommend to prepare SUMP for cities with over 25,000 inhabitants or having a resort status. The experience of countries that are more advanced in SUM planning also indicates that legislation is an important step in the development and stability of SUM planning and could contribute to less dependence of SUM planning in Lithuanian on EU financing and initiatives. Legislation can also strengthen cross-sectoral integration in SUM planning in long term perspective. The National SUMP Guidelines is the basis for SUM planning development. It delineates the organizational framework, SUM planning process. It will also serve as the basis for integrating SUM planning with other sectors, especially the spatial and environmental and will define the relationship between SUM planning and strategic spatial planning in municipalities and its role in spatial planning, environmental protection and other sectors. In 2019, National SUMP

205

Guidelines will be updated and supplemented with minimal SUM planning standards and set monitoring and evaluation and quality assessment schemes. 4 Financing This chapter is made up of extracts from the Lithuanian Programme for Development of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. Experience from more developed countries shows that a successful National SUMP Programme requires stable and clearly defined financial and other support schemes. Financial resources (EU and national) are an important element of implementing SUM planning. European resources have emerged as the main motivation for kick-starting SUM planning in many countries; the further comprehensive system of support for municipalities can be achieved by countries deploying their own resources. Financial Incentives The current financial incentives for SUM planning in Lithuania are mostly based on cohesion funding for sustainable mobility. The Cohesion Fund (CF) is financing the preparation of SUMPs and implementation of measures for sustainable mobility in cities (promoting public transport, integration of non-motorised vehicles, trip structure by modes of transport, traffic safety and security, improvement of traffic organisation and mobility management, urban logistics, promoting universality of the transport system and including people with special needs, promoting intelligent transport systems). A smaller portion of the road safety, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure funding is also guaranteed from the national Road maintenance and development program, which could potentially become a permanent source of financing more SUM planning activities in Lithuania. One potential political ‘hot potato’ is the subject of road tax. The MoTC has not ruled out looking into this possible form of income especially as countries move towards supporting the principle of ‘polluter pays’. Income from any road tax is planned to use for financing of bicycle infrastructure near the national roads, but in the future perspective this could be as a resource for promoting of sustainable mobility issues. Other Forms of Incentives A number of incentives and mechanisms will be implemented that will stimulate the interest in SUM planning in municipalities and responsible bodies at the national level (media channels, conferences, annual events, etc.). Smaller municipalities with limited financial and staff resources for SUM planning will be encouraged to network and collaborate with other municipalities for SUMP development.

206

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome

There is a well-established urban transport planning framework that incorporates SUMPs , fully supported from the national/regional level with most of the following elements: a legal definition, national guidance on SUMPs, monitoring and evaluation, trainings etc.; Draft of SUMP development programme was elaborated and will be developed within next year. As a result of Ministry representative participation in Prosperity activities, Ministry of Transport developed a promotional campaign for SUMP at national level. Also efforts to create stronger cooperation between national authorities in sustainable transport management was taken and annual National Conference for local authorities is planned to organize every year. A recommendations to develop academic modules on specific SUMP areas of knowledge such as mobility management, parking policy linked to urban space design, economic benefits of sustainable mobility and transport etc, were given to academic society. NTF brought 3 ministries to one table to discuss the future development of urban mobility. SUMP Programme will enable Lithuanian Transport Ministry to play a leading role to ensure constant solutions for sustainable mobility. What worked well? Training and exchange within the project has substantially helped the staff of the Ministry of Transport to become more confident and in some areas, more capable. Also connections and contacts have been made which will last beyond the project lifespan. What did not work well? Cities involvement in events organised within the project was not as high as was thought at the project start. It was expected more politicians or high level municipal administration representatives. Unfortunately, municipal administration and local politicians are overloaded by work which was the reason for their lower attendance. Overall assessment of SUMP Programme People: In the last few years, the political support for sustainable urban mobility development here in LT has been high. We now have top political decision makers who have bought into the benefits of developing SUMPs – including the Minister himself. Around him there is a good, young team of specialists and experts and it is important for the Ministry of Transport and Communications to keep these within the SUMP department. Policy: Although we now have policy in place that guides the largest cities in LT in making and implementing their SUMP, this policy is very much based on, and decided by what comes out of the European Commission. In fact if it wasn’t for the EU White Paper on sustainable mobility, and the provision of funding in the 2014-2020 LT Operational Programme, I don’t believe LT would be at the position we are now in with SUMP development. So, we need to make sure that our politicians are constantly made aware of EC policy and how to implement it and to incorporate it into our own national policy. Practice: Related to both of the above, we need to keep cities interested in learning about SUMP developments in other cities. PROSPERITY has been good for LT for this reason; that we have managed to get our policy makers engaged with other policy makers from other cities in other EU countries, as well as inviting experts here to LT. Somehow we must try to get our

207 cities involved in EU projects on sustainable transport and mobility, most probably through partnerships with other cities perhaps from PROSPERITY. Continuation of the SUMP Programme Key factors for the continuation of the SUMP Programme: • Regular meetings of National SUMP Commission (NTF will be integrated in it) with LT Ministry of Transport • Promotion of EU and other international events on sustainable transport and mobility to our cities / PROSPERITY network members • Continued thematic workshops on the nine themes that make up the SUMP guidelines in LT • Cooperation on national campaigns for road safety

208

Appendix Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main agenda Main agenda: fill 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of other Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Launch Info on 2017- Awareness Exchange of Meeting Vilnius 5 Other PROSPERITY; 03 raising experience LT Questionaire Second 2018- Preparation of National Exchange of Strategic Vilnius LT 7 SUMP promotion Meeting 03 SUMP Programme experience planning Third Meeting 15 Elaboration of quality Discuss Strategic Other 2019- assessment monitoring means planning Vilnius LT 05 for SUMP implementation National SUMP promo events Name of the Date Multiple- City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event day event er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) "Sustainable mobility and Awareness Exchange of Capacity 2017-01 no 26 organiser environment raising experience building al quality" Kaunas LT

209

Name of the Date Multiple- City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event day event er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) https://ecat.lt/d National arnaus- judumo- Awareness Exchange of Capacity SUMP 2017-11 yes 24 organiser mieste- training raising experience building planavimo- event Kaunas LT mokymai/ SUMP Exchange of Capacity Awareness workshop/1s 2017-11 yes Jonava LT 13 organiser experience building raising t coaching https://ecat.lt/k SUMP and vieciame-i- informacini- Exchange of Capacity Awareness Sustainable 2018-04 no Vilnius LT 40 organiser darnaus- experience building raising mobility" judumo- rengini/ http://jonavosn aujienos.lzinio s.lt/jonava- %e2%80%92- SUMP pirmaujantis- 2018-05- darnaus- Capacity Exchange of Strategic workshop/2 no Jonava LT 11 organiser 29 judumo-planu- building experience planning nd coaching rengime- miestas- %e2%80%92- skatina- mokytis-ir-

210

Promo event 2018-11 no Vilnius LT 23 https://ecat.l co-organiser Exchange of Capacity Strategic -Conference t/kvieciame- experience building planning and i-informacini- workshop " darnaus- Means to judumo- Achieve rengini/ Sustainable Mobility" Promo event 2019-04- no Vilnius LT 94 https://www co-organiser Awareness Exchange of Other - Conference 19 .facebook.co raising experience "Forum of m/susisiekim Sustainable o.ministerija Mobility /videos/2576 2019" 2687124015 67/ https://www .facebook.co m/events/36 4319647758 822/

211

212

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

1 "Sustainable mobility in the city:climate, training/seminar/workshop 2018-02 no no Vilnius Lithuania air, health" CIVITAS PORTIS Workshop "SUSTAINABLE conference 2 URBAN MOBILITY SOLUTIONS FOR 2017-10 no no Klaipeda Lithuania KLAIPEDA" “Children's Health in a Changing conference 3 2018-03 no no Vilnius Lithuania Environment” Mobility week lounch/"Sustainable Travel public campaign 4 2018-09 no no Panevežys Lithuania - Healthy Life"

213

2 secondary primary secondary primary secondary N/A primary primary N/A

3 primary secondary N/A secondary N/A N/A N/A N/A primary

4 secondary secondary N/A N/A N/A N/A primary secondary N/A

214

http://www.am.lt/VI/index.php Exchange of 1 69 active participation Awareness raising Capacity building #a/19179 experience http://civitas.eu/news/portis- Exchange of 2 60 active participation Awareness raising Capacity building goes-public-klaipeda experience http://www.vsi.mf.vu.lt/galerija /respublikine-moksline- Exchange of 3 80 praktine-konferencija-vaiku- active participation Capacity building Awareness raising experience sveikata-kintancioje- aplinkoje-2018-03-28 http://www.panevezysvsb.lt/e uropos-judumo-savaite-2018- pasirink-ir-judek/judrioji- 4 60 savaite-panevezyje_2018/; active participation Awareness raising Awareness raising http://www.panevezys.lt/lt/na ujienos/rugsejo-15-22- huz5.html;

215

Dissemination Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Prospe seco Project roll- second prim prim rity nation other 2017-11 primary primary ndar N/A primary N/A up ary ary ary promo al y tion Prospe Project prim prim prim rity nation other 2018-09 primary primary primary N/A primary N/A bags ary ary ary promo al tion

Project seco SUMP brochu prim prim second prim nation Innovation 2018-11 primary primary primary primary ndar inform re ary ary ary ary al Briefs y ation

216

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link Prospe Project seco eyeglass prim prim rity nation other 2019-04 primary primary primary ndar N/A primary N/A cleaning ary ary promo al y cloths tion Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Magazine "Savivaldy Prospe seco seco mo http://www.sav newsp bių Second second prim second rity nation 2017-10 primary ndar N/A ndar N/A nth zinios.lt/index.p apers žinios"Nr.2 ary ary ary ary promo al y y ly hp?lang=lt&id=0 0 (813- tion 814), Magazine "Savivaldy seco seco SUMP mo newsp Second second prim second nation bių 2018-08 primary ndar N/A ndar N/A inform nth apers ary ary ary ary al žinios"Nr.1 y y ation ly 4,

217

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link Magazine Prospe seco seco we newsp "Žaliasis Second second prim prim second rity nation 2019-05 primary ndar N/A ndar ekl apers pasaulis" ary ary ary ary ary promo al y y y Nr17 tion Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Prospe online seco "Mano Second second prim prim second rity nation dail newsp 2017-10 primary ndar N/A N/A http://manokrastas.lt/str krastas.lt" ary ary ary ary ary promo al y aipsnis/darnus-judumas- aper y mieste-%E2%80%93- tion problema-ar-issukis online seco SUMP hhttp://www.jonavoszini "Jonavos second second prim prim dail os.lt/jonava-pirmaujantis- newsp 2017-11 primary ndar N/A primary N/A inform local darnaus-judumo-planu- žinios" ary ary ary ary y rengime-miestas-skatina- aper y ation mokytis-ir-kitas-lietuvos

ECAT Prospe https://ecat.lt/kvietimas- seco seco dalyvauti-darnaus- websit website second Second second prim second rity nation oth 2017-11 ndar N/A ndar N/A judumo-planavimo- e www.ecat.l ary ary ary ary ary promo al er mieste-mokymuose- y y 2017-lapkricio-20-23- t tion kaunas-2/

218

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link http://www.jonava.lt/na Prospe ujienos/- Jonava seco /asset_publisher/4DRn/ websit second prim prim rity dail content/jonava- municipalit 2017-11 primary primary ndar N/A primary N/A local pirmaujantis-darnaus- e ary ary ary promo y judumo-planu-rengime- y website y miestas-skatina- tion mokytis-ir-kitas- lietuvos-savivaldybes Kaunas city seco SUMP websit website: Second second prim prim dail http://www.kaunas.lt/20 2017-11 primary ndar N/A primary N/A inform local 17/11/naujienos/viesoje e www.kaun ary ary ary ary y -diskusijoje-kaunieciai- y ation kalbejo-apie-judejima- as.lt kaune/ http://jonavosnaujienos. Prospe lzinios.lt/jonava- online seco %e2%80%92- "Jonavos Second second prim prim rity dail newsp 2018-06 primary N/A N/A primary ndar local pirmaujantis-darnaus- naujienos" ary ary ary ary promo y judumo-planu-rengime- aper y miestas-%e2%80%92- tion skatina-mokytis-ir-kitas- lietuvos-savivaldybes/

219

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link

https://www.jonava.lt/naujienos/- /asset_publisher/MrYJbkwIPbqY/content/j onava-pirmaujantis-darnaus-judumo- Jonava planu-rengime-miestas-skatina-mokytis- ir-kitas-lietuvos-savivaldyb- Prospe 1?_101_INSTANCE_MrYJbkwIPbqY_red municipalit seco irect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jonava.lt%2 websit second second prim prim rity dail Fnaujienos%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTAN CE_MrYJbkwIPbqY%26p_p_lifecycle%3 y website 2018-06 primary N/A N/A primary ndar local D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mo e ary ary ary ary promo y de%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn- 2%26p_p_col_count%3D1&redirect=https www.jonav y %3A%2F%2Fwww.jonava.lt%2Fnaujieno tion s%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_MrYJb kwIPbqY%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p_p a.lt _state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dvie w%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn- 2%26p_p_col_count%3D1 Prospe seco social FB "Jonavos Second second prim prim rity dail 2018-06 primary N/A N/A primary ndar local media zinios" ary ary ary ary promo y https://www.facebook.c y om/jonavoszinios.lt/pos tion ts/1749602351800214 online Baltic News seco SUMP second prim prim second nation dail newsp Service 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform ary ary ary ary al y https://sc.bns.lt/view/ite aper agency y ation m/275783 online seco SUMP https://www.etaplius.lt/p second prim prim second region dail ristates-analogu- newsp Eta -plius 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform pasaulyje-neturincia- ary ary ary ary al y mobilia-aplikacija- aper y ation kaunas-zengia-toliau

220

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link online seco SUMP https://www.skaitykit.lt/ second prim prim second region dail pristates-analogu- newsp skaitykit.lt 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform pasaulyje-neturincia- ary ary ary ary al y mobilia-aplikacija- aper y ation kaunas-zengia-toliau/ online seco SUMP https://topcom.lt/pristat second prim prim second region dail es-analogu-pasaulyje- newsp topcom.lt 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform neturincia-mobilia- ary ary ary ary al y aplikacija-kaunas- aper y ation zengia-toliau/ http://www.elektronika.lt online seco SUMP /projektai/kompiuterija/6 elektronika second prim prim second specifi oth newsp 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform 4343/pristates-analogu- .lt ary ary ary ary c er pasaulyje-neturincia- aper y ation mobilia-aplikacija- kaunas-zengia-toliau/ https://y- online seco SUMP news.lt/pristates- second prim prim second region dail newsp y-news.lt 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform analogu-pasaulyje- ary ary ary ary al y neturincia-mobilia- aper y ation aplikacija-kaunas- zengia-toliau/ online seco SUMP https://miestonaujienos. miestonauji second prim prim second region dail lt/pristates-analogu- newsp 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform pasaulyje-neturincia- enos.lt ary ary ary ary al y mobilia-aplikacija- aper y ation kaunas-zengia-toliau/

221

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link online seco SUMP https://www.litas.lt/prist second prim prim second region dail ates-analogu- newsp litas.lt 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform pasaulyje-neturincia- ary ary ary ary al y mobilia-aplikacija- aper y ation kaunas-zengia-toliau/ online seco SUMP second prim prim second region dail newsp poko.lt 2018-07 primary primary N/A N/A ndar inform ary ary ary ary al y http://poko.lt/post/1795 aper y ation 49023/

https://lt- social ECAT FB 2018-09 primary primary second prim N/A N/A prim second seco SUMP nation oth lt.facebook.com/ecatLT/posts/1823 676224374626?__xts__%5B0%5D=6 media ary ary ary ary ndar inform al er 8.ARDpkKDSnDwZLdLQH9PMaEYfz9 4jWaypn_FNCZn2Foe3UhyAvxz9qui y ation UxgghGBOkrp8W1EtPEBP3IESJKak W1roQJDhgPsiD6LNd0mDPqGyUlBy O7HzYbSmVsjn89xotHfDN7eV05uA n5ujG-49Cx- OdjFR9U3ZEuXELjWGq6yPbq3f8u- eSnq- 4jWGjJT5LlB02WckWwcDbJY5rtI6o4 7EkThS_cgjF_YOjVG9bBE_8N8SmII2 nBCFNRtORaV2YUbvG6UPZ0d0bx1S gFaOtzPyxbAVlqgdxKm1gueaEL5cvit FupnOWS9CpLJAGLStfd94XLY3TU5c bCmN25K9rzNUuHDjX49ciOA&__tn __=-R

222

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link

https://www.jonava.lt/blog-as/- /asset_publisher/V4QLCvruMlGk/content/ projektas-690636-prosperity-h2020-mg- 2014-2015-darnaus-judumo-planu-djmp- jonavos-mieste-rengimas-igyvendinimas- djmp-inovaciju- Prospe apzvalga?_101_INSTANCE_V4QLCvruM Jonava seco lGk_redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jon websit second prim prim rity oth ava.lt%2Fblog- as%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_V4Q municipalit 2018-10 primary primary ndar N/A primary N/A local LCvruMlGk%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p e ary ary ary promo er _p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dv iew%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn- y website y 2%26p_p_col_count%3D1&redirect=https tion %3A%2F%2Fwww.jonava.lt%2Fblog- as%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_V4Q LCvruMlGk%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p _p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dv iew%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn- 2%26p_p_col_count%3D1

https://www.jonava.lt/naujienos/- /asset_publisher/MrYJbkwIPbqY/content/ darnaus-judumo-pletra-lietuvoje- perspektyvi-pripazinta- ivertinta?_101_INSTANCE_MrYJbkwIPb qY_redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jona Jonava seco seco seco SUMP va.lt%2Fnaujienos%3Fp_p_id%3D101_I websit second second second dail NSTANCE_MrYJbkwIPbqY%26p_p_lifec ycle%3D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26 municipalit 2018-10 primary primary ndar ndar ndar N/A inform local p_p_mode%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dc e ary ary ary y olumn- 2%26p_p_col_count%3D1&redirect=https y website y y y ation %3A%2F%2Fwww.jonava.lt%2Fnaujieno s%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_MrYJb kwIPbqY%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p_p _state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dvie w%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn- 2%26p_p_col_count%3D1 online seco seco seco SUMP second second second region dail https://www.etaplius.lt/d newsp Eta -plius 2018-10 primary primary ndar ndar ndar N/A inform arnaus-judumo-pletra- ary ary ary al y lietuvoje-perspektyvi- aper y y y ation pripazinta-ivertinta

223

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link http://www.manokrasta online seco seco seco SUMP s.lt/straipsnis/darnaus- "Mano second second second nation dail newsp 2018-10 primary primary ndar ndar ndar N/A inform judumo-pletra-lietuvoje- krastas.lt" ary ary ary al y %E2%80%93- aper y y y ation perspektyvi-pripazinta- ivertinta- https://www.jonavoszini Prospe os.lt/naujiena/projektas- online seco 690636--prosperity- Jonavos second prim prim rity dail h2020-mg-2014-2015- newsp 2018-10 primary primary ndar N/A primary N/A local darnaus-judumo-planu- zinios ary ary ary promo y djmp-jonavos-mieste- aper y rengimas- tion igyvendinimas-djmp- inovaciju-apzvalga ECAT Prospe seco seco websit website prim second rity nation oth 2018-10 primary primary primary ndar N/A ndar N/A https://ecat.lt/kvieciame e www.ecat.l ary ary promo al er -pagilinti-darnaus- y y judumo-zinias- t tion vebinaruose/ seco seco seco SUMP websit ECAT second second second nation oth https://ecat.lt/darnaus- 2018-10 primary primary ndar ndar ndar N/A inform judumo-pletra-lietuvoje- e website ary ary ary al er perspektyvi-pripazinta- y y y ation ivertinta/

224

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link www.ecat.l t ECAT seco SUMP websit website second prim prim second nation oth 2018-10 primary primary ndar N/A N/A inform e www.ecat.l ary ary ary ary al er y ation https://ecat.lt/project/pr t osperity/ https://www.facebook.c om/ecatLT/posts/18691 14729830775?__xts__ %5B0%5D=68.ARAnD PQGQBb335QSGkpBq J7nTad8lPjpS0hcb_CR Prospe wHqIO72- seco eAsocwLNftHBV2XB4q social second second prim prim second rity nation oth ECAT FB 2018-10 primary ndar N/A N/A O3zvDGmSjnFwePq05 media ary ary ary ary ary promo al er RE87JY_AlzLXwNKDg y D3egDlur_4RW2mvm4 tion SGe3hmhUNaS1r2rEV XqChOrHGG6dttbrV2Fj FHB0gzWWLEBQBUT hOANwOsYikbv6L4Tfu abR2AEakzagtflMaQZ S7UGN0Oj5xi99pg&__t n__=-R

225

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link https://www.facebook.com/ ecatLT/posts/18679714232 78439?__xts__%5B0%5D= 68.ARBQnB2Z1RDSploC6 Prospe 9MK7PvdWKZ77SHPOZh1 seco kaV3GZ3M8wcVDsdYoDP social second second prim prim second rity nation oth yJhjbJmp_XV1qD6K_v252 ECAT FB 2018-10 primary ndar N/A N/A wFNUs6ZZSDO- media ary ary ary ary ary promo al er qUvgy1jX4k8d1XPkM1IGJp y rENSF_jUlghN3wlf2zrBsu- tion GmO8KDmju-W- pqGHMfkjHLKFgk7SOXZlY Du01_LRCtdpLH6Tqs3U8r pRCxT7IXxI2DRvitBUxzz3v XIrgNlC4w&__tn__=-R Prospe seco seco social second second prim second prim second rity nation oth ECAT FB 2018-11 primary ndar ndar media ary ary ary ary ary ary promo al er y y tion https://www.delfi.lt/multi online seco SUMP medija/kvepuojantis- prim prim second prim second nation dail miestas/vilnius- newsp DELFI 2019-04 primary primary primary ndar inform klaipeda-ir-panevezys- ary ary ary ary ary al y paskelbti-ateities- aper y ation miestais.d?id=8095989 9

226

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link http://ebus.lt/darn SUMP social prim prim prim prim specifi oth aus-judumo- 2019-04 primary primary primary primary primary inform forume-apie-patirti- media ary ary ary ary c er ation ir-darnaus-judumo- eBus.lt problemas/print https://sumin.lrv.lt/lt/ SUMP websit LT prim prim prim prim nation oth naujienos/savivaldybe 2019-04 primary primary primary primary primary inform ms-apdovanojimai-uz- e Transport ary ary ary ary al er ation darniausio-miesto- Ministry vizija

https://www.15min.lt/gazas/ online "15 min" 2019- primary primary primary prim prim primary prim primary seco SUMP nation dail naujiena/saugukelyje- newsp 04-18 ary ary ary ndar inform al lt/savivaldybems- y apdovanojimai-uz-darniausio- aper y ation miesto-vizija-787- 1132692?all#print

online DELFI 2019- primary primary primary prim prim primary prim primary prim SUMP nation https://www.delfi.lt/multime dail dija/kvepuojantis- newsp 04-19 ary ary ary ary inform al miestas/vilnius-klaipeda-ir- y panevezys-paskelbti-ateities- aper ation miestais.d?id=80959899

227

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link https://lt- ECAT FB 2019- primary primary primary prim prim primary prim primary prim SUMP nation oth lt.facebook.com/ecatLT/posts/2214 214841987427?__xts__%5B0%5D=6 06-17 ary ary ary ary inform al er 8.ARAohgIwuEXew5fK8g9OtiGmBh0 PGW5CEEActmD9HxL10vnoq3taaM ation 8FDzmPOSwEYGn4uwaX8JBD1yFtT UcIUXyk421wDysSsMNlyJ96xs7sBZ7 social xn2nFVb5EKSN3AgttpaFRssNQiSu5c VuBgNWObwDXdn6Ge4AItNxTZDYy media iqqyrS9Cb36r-J- t3kO0xkLOoJ0fWK9F1wMrGtxv1TU 1i7SObTqFbiPBKqIJYwQQgum_t0ifa 9v4QjA8MWvi0kcafZH3vWwSY0TT5 rUjJqZQBPSPAWWrTvtbg7BBnIvFsro nt-7mfmUjehYltGu0lSkDFITCO- OQhWiSpHNdTf2jyDWRgQ&__tn__ =-R

https://lt- ECAT FB 2019- primary primary primary prim prim primary prim primary prim Prospe nation oth lt.facebook.com/ecatLT/photos/a.1 144699412272314/2214175141991 06-17 ary ary ary ary rity al er 397/?type=3&__xts__%5B0%5D=68 .ARD7TCn_J00ZJ68uDuGfiKNMVjA4 promo DZOCHUOy6ci5CEhuKNkGypAWxuN abDQFSfhixBjjxrHHwRy4CHLkoJOnE social tion OjzG2QIBEmkajmM3aTnpW0vL7Z6B _-Q-zvR0DIGOA0plmwyDWai- media iBHE4p0kcGDAKmPg0I53txvH_GDuh aj2vNAFpP_LE20aOCTKA1cOoyNTo2 XJe1gFpojZg9ISXWKEUP4ljE0P- QmxoRT6xQlfyMsfiDpRnLfzxih0E7kl oy2AtFbpIdqJPY2QZVseFTG2vkL- _Uwv0V1TVAoZwVWzBZQWO- js0xVFxlEY1_Jd8GF2ExLuhyPLq_Ym WsrmbofuUbhYQ&__tn__=-R

228

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link https://lt- social ECAT FB 2019- primary primary primary prim prim primary prim primary prim SUMP nation oth lt.facebook.com/ecatLT/posts/2115 016835240562?__xts__%5B0%5D=6 media 04-18 ary ary ary ary inform al er 8.ARAYQ5gU47yqasURwvdq4GVZnB kLB3sO8RofHigYhJWYrGHZvBmWU ation D5ZLf7c1eew75eXKsOHrWjhPZVPm susmyBmFvHa0Gr6o- zJuZIZaJ6ymhbE-Scp- KfLAMP4PDofjXlWc6wNaxWbbq6y3 acTmei6cI3za_TSkkym_G9s5txyYA1 wXHW96EobUDsJRh8sTXwFGIsrDqi 7xVgtgMJJzlQ8ul2UlFy_xzB27DNauP KkqKnb6fkTFYuylfDpQD2MlcXlX1mx zvjENEJfbf9HbOM0wEb6eCX8iiP- 8AJ60BbY5te7t1dhYguvwgpeC2ASc 1GP5bb9lZYOBFHpFczHUYqm6t3oX 3lJ3Zai7ZSNkiTC91vVPx5Gyoi7f4QR RPIuoO1tNIshpycuLXgJ4ZxorquvyiF QpVguDus- eVQ1_UBkK3kKssWYdDf3aKEdfBW D0IucinaaN4sElEwGXfz_fzOyMf- Y1P29DS4QRmQ0gRWq&__tn__=-R

https://lt- social ECAT FB 2018- second primary primary seco prim second seco second seco SUMP nation oth lt.facebook.com/ecatLT/posts/1896 832873725627?__xts__%5B0%5D=6 media 11-13 ary ndar ary ary ndar ary ndar inform al er 8.ARA9DvkAP6el3G- QQiUwggC2WM2w3NI73VL_CnhcgZ y y y ation U0BbTgB6ctFC351lHq3rWJ2H1Dr4X 00_r0tWhzG-V3nCE0W8e2nt_4L- 2_xlJRIU_HFtuDYvxt23jVdOlo5r_LSY Ii6XK- krIBpKsblNWpxnP6IqUEMqVkT1GnK cO2lGn3jMS4j8Tc5XBwi- ycfOsLVRc4N75V- ZA_jzSRZZhU75bRqWjzekjmViDQ5P Bcm_4UBY93jMfSl64cZre5yTxSmq2 8aY12twPW_PbgXNmAIrOG_C67iJw

229

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link GUbtb4gn-4CkYHtdmspECW- dNxNunlOkeMtaQvjLG5cSXzPqNqb1 Sf7ErJQ&__tn__=-R

https://www.facebook.com/ecatLT/ social ECAT FB 2019- primary primary primary prim prim second seco second seco Prospe nation oth photos/a.411417285600534/22419 50179213893/?type=3&__xts__%5B media 07-03 ary ary ary ndar ary ndar rity al er 0%5D=68.ARAHsh8mOXpq_6Mk0dK xZTYj4_EfQENSwsEXCRKTUeM7og8 y y promo DefOK3fuRLVMjcnYuKQ8PcUxDiWn qBJgiNLxw81oZu4R6joGxoZLblXCNtf tion C2yp1- UuiJos_X0QEv9NngnHgdN9opj7hxB LN_4hFLG5E2Z_KG1- mw8WenV_mPZDlmOOdtt- N02fxY9qDNqMhiYeCaxN5LiCj9GlXx Nt3qOcN0UX_y76d8aljmlCbj5PDM2 agDNjk_IK062MPLQY10wGE6heAliR ZAPFxI- ZEHyTb1FJoYQ3r8jnrHUsv7DEAfjIBZj qs5baUvzJvN38zhNNFcZX1I9ao5KG oiAL0wigtIjA&__tn__=-R online Vilnius, 2019- nation newsp Klaipėda ir 08-01 al aper Panevėžys paskelbti ateities https://www.delfi.lt/multimedija/kv epuojantis-miestas/vilnius-klaipeda- ir-panevezys-paskelbti-ateities- miestais miestais.d?id=80959899

230

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applie (if Frequency exists) (if Link Regular blogging

Informatio oth www.jonava,lt; n about seco SUMP er https://www.jo second prim prim Prosperity 2016-11 primary primary ndar N/A primary N/A inform local nava.lt/blog-as ary ary ary project y ation start

News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ------

231

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Poland

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author(s): Maciej Michnej, Tomasz Zwoliński | SMG Ekspert

Date: June 2019

Status: Final

232

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 234

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 234

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 234

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 236

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 239

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 240

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 240

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 241

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 241

4 FINANCING ...... 241

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 242

APPENDIX ...... 244

233

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (37) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (38) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (39) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (40) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

234

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email smg@smg- Maciej Michnej SMG Ekspert Leading NFP ekspert.pl City tomasz.zwolinski Tomasz representative/N @um.krakow.pl Zwolinski City of Krakow FP support Bogusław City Boguslaw.Lowak Lowak City of Katowice representative @katowice.eu City Pawel.Sucheta@k Paweł Sucheta City of Katowice representative atowice.eu Maria HLG Maria.Perkuszews Perkuszewska Ministry of Infrastructure representative [email protected] Magdalena Ministry of Infrastructure HLG Magdalena.Ogono Ogonowska representative [email protected] Maricn Wołek City Council Gdynia National expert [email protected] HLG Anna.Pietrzak@mi Anna Pietrzak Ministry of Infrastructure representative .gov.pl Małgorzata Ministry of Investment and HLG Malgorzata.Kubisz [email protected] Kubiszewska Economic Development representative l Ministry of Investment and HLG Anna.Homa@miir. Anna Homa Economic Development representative gov.pl Dorota Ministry of Investment and HLG Dorota.Szymczuk Szymczuk Economic Development representative @miir.gov.pl Ministry of Investment and HLG Wojciech.Turek@ Wojciech Turek Economic Development representative miir.gov.pl HLG EJaszczuk@cupt. Edyta Jaszczuk Centre for EU Transport Projects representative gov.pl HLG [email protected]. Tomasz Wydra Centre for EU Transport Projects representative pl Barbara EU EC, DG Regio - Adamczyk representative Małgorzata Jaspers - EBI - Mokrzańska National expert

Task Force meetings Four Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were a preparation of National SUMP Programme, elaboration of legal and institutional conditions. TF Group consisted of representatives of NFP, Ministry of Infrastructure, City of Katowice and external expert Dr. Marcin Wołek. In the final phase of the project, the TF team was joined by representatives of the Ministry of Investment and Development, the Centre for EU Transport Projects and Jaspers. In total, four meetings were held within the TF Group. The composition 235 of the staff was sufficient to carry out the tasks. Special attention should be paid to taking the leading role and chairmanship of the group by the Ministry of Infrastructure. At TF meetings, in addition to the implementation of the basic tasks related to the development of the SUMP Program, current issues related to the implementation of the project Prosperity were agreed and discussed. The greatest success of TF Group was to agree on the final version of the national SUMP guide prepared by NFP SMG, which was officially presented by the Deputy Minister of Infrastructure at the 3rd SUMP Promo event, in which participated about 140 representatives of local government, scientific and industry environments. The meetings of the TF working group will be continued after the completion of the Prosperity project within the framework of the working group officially appointed by the Minister of Infrastructure, enlarged by experts representing the scientific community and representatives of cities. The main task of the TF group will be to implement the provisions of the SUMP Promo program. The main output of the Task Force's work is the SUMP Programme and the commitment to the Task Force to continue its work beyond the PROSPERITY project. One of the main other outputs was the National SUMP Guidebook, prepared with all members of the Task Force, under the leading role of NFP Poland.

2.2 National SUMP network The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

236

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network POLAND SUMP Network (Endurance) Host of the Web address of the Contact E-mail address Tel. network network name number SMG http://www.epomm.eu/end Maciej [email protected] 486161195 Ekspert urance/index.php?id=2809 Michnej 49 &country=pl Membership Cities/regions Other institutions Chorzów Dąbrowa Górnicza Elbląg Gdynia Grudziądz Jaworzno Jelenia Góra Kalisz Konin Koszalin Katowice Kraków Legnica Lublin Olsztyn Opole Ostrowiec Św. Płock Rybnik Słupsk Tarnów Tomaszów Mazowiecki Tychy Wrocław Włocławek

237

In June 2019 - 16 of 38 (42%) of all Polish cities over 100.000 inhabitants were network members. Since the PROSPERITY project started (September 2016), the total number of Polish network members increased from 22 to 26 members.

238

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

The city activation strategy was in particular designed for cities to join national existing or newly established SUMPs networks. As these networks have been already established in most of Prosperity countries within Endurance project, city activation is not needed any more in countries where national SUMP networks work well. For the rest of countries it is recommended to use the principles of it. It is relevant especially in Croatia and Cyprus which were not Endurance partners. As of June 2019 there are 22 Polish cities listed on the country website. Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

239

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 2018-03-16 Defining targets / selecting 1 12 measures / Implementing measures Coaching 2 2018-04-13 Communication and 1 9 stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP / measures

Presenting own SUMP and providing help in the form of QAs from their own experience Coaching 3 2018-10-17 Institutional cooperation in 1 12 metropolitan areas / sharing responsibilities between institutional players

The main impact of coachings was a big progress in integrated mobility planning across the complex urban region of which the City of Katowice is a key part. Coach Prof Tom Rye of Edinburgh Napier University explained how many sustainable urban mobility measures for the Silesian Metropolitan Region, such as integrated transport and land use planning or a common PT operator require joint working between cities. This helped the City of Katowice to convince the board of Silesian Metropolis to prepare a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan for the region. 2.5 Training(s) One regular four-day training was organised in the project city of Katowice. Another two-day extra training took place in Warsaw. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2018-04 - 09–13 Adopting the SUMP approach for 19 25 Training small and mid sizes cities How does SUMP mesh with statutory land use plans

Monitoring and evaluation

Communication and stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP - measures

240

Extra 2018-11 – 26-27 Mobility plans for traffic generators 16 23 Training SUMP and the use of public space The main impact of the first training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in 19 not experienced cities. The second training attracted 16 cities and was focused on mobility plans, experiences in implementing logistics-oriented measures and political buy-in and public space use. 2.6 Other meetings and dissemination activities Several types of other activities took place to promote SUMPs at national level: Meetings: - National SUMP Promo Events - annual national SUMP conference in own country (national training weeks are excluded). - Third-party Events - events with active participation (with own original content): presentation, leading a workshop, lecturing Dissemination: - Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project - Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Regular blogging – In terms of the PROSPERITY project a blog is represented as a dedicated section on the respective city website, on a respective national SUMP platform website, or on the CIVITAS PROSPERITY website. Regular blogging on own experience with the whole SUMP process (both, planning and implementation) by city representatives, experts and NFP in their own local language to encourage follower cities in the own country to become active. - News and case studies - news and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework The CIVITAS PROSPERITY project has recognised that the development and stability of this planning approach will need to be integrated into the legal framework and that it will be necessary to develop a certain legal basis for SUMP planning in Poland. The experience of countries that are more advanced in SUMP planning also shows that legislation is an important step in the development and sustainability of SUMP planning and can contribute to reducing the dependence of SUMP planning in Poland on funding and EU initiatives. Legislation can also strengthen cross-sectoral integration in SUMP planning. 4 Financing The programme envisages efforts to include financing for the development and implementation of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans within the Infrastructure Operational Programme and

241

Environment. Infrastructure and Environment Programme 2014-2020 is the largest programme funded by the European Commission from the European Funds not only in Poland, but also in the European Union. The main areas to which funds are transferred are: low-carbon economy, environmental protection, combating and adaptation to climate change, transport and energy security, health protection and cultural heritage. Thanks to the balance between infrastructure investment activities and support targeted at selected areas of the economy, the programme will effectively implement the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, to which its main objective is linked - to support a resource-efficient and environmentally friendly economy that is conducive to territorial and social cohesion. As at the date of completion of this report, due to the high level of Programme allocation, it is not possible to allocate directly the financial resources of the Infrastructure and Environment Operational Programme for financing the process of preparing SUMP documents by local governments. However, other activities are undertaken to support local governments and to link the sources of funding for other activities with the implementation of SUMP.

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome In Polish conditions the main outcome of the project is creation of National Task Force, interest of its members to work behind the PROSPERITY project and elaboration of National SUMP Programme. One of the main other outputs was the National SUMP Guidebook, prepared with all members of the Task Force, under the leading role of NFP Poland. Due to the training and national SUMP promo events the PROSPERITY project contributed to increase the knowledge of SUMPs among Polish cities which were in different levels of SUMP preparation, elaboration or implementation. The main impact of coachings was a big progress in integrated mobility planning across the complex urban region of which the City of Katowice is a key part. Coach Prof Tom Rye of Edinburgh Napier University explained how many sustainable urban mobility measures for the Silesian Metropolitan Region, such as integrated transport and land use planning or a common PT operator require joint working between cities. This helped the City of Katowice to convince the board of Silesian Metropolis to prepare a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan for the region. NTF brought 2 ministries to one table to discuss a plan conditions of urban mobility future development. SUMP Programme is the first SUMP related national strategy which builds on detail analysis and problem description, it designed solutions, set responsibilities and compiled action plan. What worked well? Thanks to early contacts between NFP and ministry, the Task Force was constitued without major issues. During the lifetime of the project, ministries gained more awareness and knowledge about SUMP. The representative of ministry was constantly engaged in the project workflow, including participation in the international exchange workshops What did not work well? There were no major barriers, only some related to availability of certain TF members for meetings attendance and continuous work on tasks. Continuation of the SUMP promotion programme

242

The continuation of the SUMP promo programme in Poland will take place within the framework of further meetings of the working group officially established by the Ministry. The established working group will deal with detailed development and implementation of the solutions described in the SUMP Programme, which were not implemented within the time horizon of the Prosperity project.

243

Appendix

Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main agenda Main agenda: fill 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of other Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Information about Launch 2017- Elaboration on legal PROSPERITY Awareness Capacity Exchange of Krakow Poland 6 Meeting 03 conditions project, members raising building experience of TF Content of SUMP Second 2018- Preparation of National Strategic Exchange of Awareness Warsaw Poland 6 promo Meeting 04 SUMP Programme planning experience raising programme Content of SUMP 2018- Elaboration on Capacity Awareness Strategic Third Meeting Warsaw Poland 9 promo 08 institutional conditions building raising planning programme Presentation of 2019- Elaboration on Strategic Capacity Awareness 4th meeting Warsaw Poland 11 SUMP promo 03 institutional conditions planning building raising programme

244

National SUMP promo events Name of the Date Multiple- City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event day event er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) http://sump- PROSPERITY Awareness Exchange of Capacity 2017-11 no Katowice Poland 30 network.eu/ organiser SEMINAR raising experience building news/#c1032 http://sump- PROSPERITY Strategic Capacity Exchange of 2018-05 no Sopot Poland 45 network.eu/ co-organiser SEMINAR planning building experience news/#c963

NATIONAL https://www Strategic Capacity Exchange of 2019-04 no Warszawa Poland 140 .eltis.org/pl/ co-organiser SUMP planning building experience CONFERENCE node/48038

245

Dissemination Target groups

d media d

/ Name of media of / Name

oliticians oliticians and decision makers on

P level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and specialise and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Polish PROSPERIT Y seco seco SUMP second second nation book guidebook 2019-04 primary N/A N/A ndar N/A N/A ndar inform ary ary al on y y ation preparing SUMPs Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. https://www.radiop iekary.pl/2017/11/ Prospe seco seco 28/konferencja-o- radio Radio second second prima prim rity region 2017-11 N/A N/A ndar ndar primary mobilnosci- spot Piekary ary ary ry ary promot al miejskiej/ y y ion

246

Target groups

d media d

/ Name of media of / Name

oliticians oliticians and decision makers on

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link

Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Prospe seco seco https://twitter.com/ social Twitter UM second second prima prim rity region umkatowice/status 2017-11 N/A N/A ndar ndar primary media Katowice ary ary ry ary promot al /93542948014282 y y ion 7520 Prospe seco seco seco https://mojekatowi websit Mojekatow second second prima rity ce.pl/t,CIVITAS- 2017-12 N/A N/A ndar ndar primary ndar local e ice.pl ary ary ry promot PROSPERITY.ht y y y ion ml https://www.transp ort- Prospe publiczny.pl/wiado online seco seco mosci/warsztaty- Transport- second seco second prim rity nation newsp 2018-10 primary N/A ndar ndar primary civitas-prosperity- Publiczny ary ndary ary ary promot al aper y y ku-lepszym- ion planom- zrownowazonej- mobilnosci-

247

Target groups

d media d

/ Name of media of / Name

oliticians oliticians and decision makers on

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link miejskiej- 60046.html Prospe online seco seco https://edroga.pl/ second seco second prim rity nation mobilnosc/projekt- newsp e-Droga 2018-10 primary N/A ndar ndar primary ary ndary ary ary promot al civitas-prosperity- aper y y ion 071116058 Twitter seco SUMP https://twitter.com/ social Ministry of prim prima prim nation 2019-04 primary primary primary ndar primary primary inform MI_GOV_PL/statu media Infrastruktu ary ry ary al y ation s/1117726507760 re 328704 Regular blogging Information m about Prospe seco o https://sump- Prosperity second prim seco second rity nation 2018-02 primary primary ndar primary N/A nt prosperity.blogspo activities ary ary ndary ary promot al y hl t.com/ and SUMP ion y news News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

248

Target groups

d media d

/ Name of media of / Name

oliticians oliticians and decision makers on

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link ------

249

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Portugal

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: José Manuel Lopes Pereira, Rui Velasco | IMT - Institute for Mobility and Transports

Date: July 2019

Status: Final

250

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 252

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 252

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 252

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 254

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 255

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 256

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 257

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 257

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 258

4 FINANCING ...... 260

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 260

APPENDIX ...... 262

251

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (41) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (42) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (43) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (44) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

252

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email

Isabel Botelho Ministry of Environment and Head of Studies, Evaluation ibotelho (Eng.ª) Mobility and Planning Services @imt-ip.pt

Sara Lobão National Municipalities sara.lobao Metropolitan Secretary (Eng.ª) Association @amp.pt

Pedro Machado Advisor of the Deputy Mayor pedro.machado Municipality of Lisbon (Eng.º) for Mobility @cm-lisboa.pt

Sandra Somsen sandra.somsen Municipality of Lisbon SUMP Coordinator (Arq.ª P.ª) @cm-lisboa.pt

Rui Velasco IMT - Institute for Mobility rvmartins Senior Mobility Expert (Dr.) and Transports @imt-ip.pt

José Manuel Lopes IMT - Institute for Mobility jmpereira Senior Mobility Expert Pereira (Arq.º) and Transports @imt-ip.pt

Carla Oliveira carla.oliveira Porto Metropolitan Area Senior Mobility Expert (Dr.ª) @amp.pt

Catarina Marcelino Head of Planning and catarina.marcelino Lisbon Metropolitan Area (Dr.ª) Coordination Division @aml.pt

Task Force meetings The Portuguese NTF incorporated representatives from the NFP, the cities, the two major metropolitan areas and the National municipalities association. The Ministerial representation was delegated on the NFP. The choice of including a small number of members that represent a large number of cities contributed to build consensus on the actions adopted, without hindering the knowledge dissemination.

Four Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were: the organization of the national meetings; the organization of the training sessions; the major obstacles for SUMP in Portugal and how to overcome them; the preparation of the National SUMP Programme; the future of the Task Force beyond Prosperity. The main output of the Task Force's work is the SUMP Programme Proposal and the commitment to the Task Force to continue its work beyond the PROSPERITY project. The SUMP Programme Proposal foresees that the NTF can become a Programme Task Force (PTF) to coordinate the implementation of the Programme throughout its validity.

The NTF provided a space to discuss the major actions needed to promote SUM change in Portugal and acted as an multi-level (national/regional/local) Advisory Board to all events organized during Prosperity project, namely the Training Sessions, the National SUMP meetings and the SUM dissemination actions. As such, many of the actions developed during Prosperity project were the result of a close collaboration between members of the NTF (e.g. 1st National SUMP Meeting organized with city of Lisbon; 2nd National SUMP Meeting organized with the metropolitan area of Porto; SUM dissemination actions organized with the city of Lisbon).

253

2.2 National SUMP network The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network Rede Nacional para o Planeamento da Mobilidade Sustentável Host of the Web address of the Contact E-mail address Tel. network network name number IMT www.imt-ip.pt Rui [email protected] 351217949 Velasco 081 Membership Cities/regions Other institutions 1. Amadora IMT – Institute for Mobility and 2. Almada Transport (the NFP) 3. Cartaxo (Note: on the last meeting of the NTF 4. Cascais the possibility of including intermunicipal communities was 5. Coruche debated and it was agreed that, 6. Lisboa futurely, the National SUMP Network 7. Loures might also include these regional 8. Palmela entitites) 9. Setúbal 10. Seixal 11. Sintra 12. Beja 13. Chaves 14. Oeiras

254

15. Fundão 16. Vendas Novas 17. Figueira da Foz 18. Barreiro 19. Faro 20. Guimarães 21. Maia 22. Porto 23. Ribeira Grande 24. Santo Tirso 25. Torres Vedras 26. V.N. de Gaia

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in

255

SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

At the end of Endurance, the Portuguese network of cities was constituted by 22 cities, and 9 of those cities signed a letter of intent to support CIVITAS PROSPERITY. Throughout the project 19 new cities become a part of the network by attending on national SUMP meeting or participating on the training sessions. In 2019 the II Clean Mobility Survey, a national Survey directed to all municipalities and carried out by the NFP, included a question for the municipalities to express whether they wanted to become part of the National SUMP network, and 89 new cities expressed their will to join the network and designated a contact point. This survey data is still being worked, and these cities are still not enlisted on the ENDURANCE project website, but these new contacts will be challenged, on future contacts, to proceed to that enlistment.

The cities that are most active in SUMP are encouraged to send their data to the NFP for publication on the ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project, in Lisbon, on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 2018-03-21 General SUMP notions 1 35 (Concept; Cycle; First Steps) Analysis of Lisbon’s mobility situation Coaching 2 2018-06-20 Lisbon SUMP 1 7 Coaching 3 2018-10-18 Tendering for Lisbon’s SUMP 1 5

The main impact of coaching was to promote an integrated vision on the SUMP that Lisbon is developing. The first session contributed significantly to this objective, by allowing the different department and services of the municipality (including the local police), the external services that work closely with the municipality (like the Municipal Energy and Environment Agency) and the main public Transport operator (Carris) to get to know the basic concepts of an SUMP and understand their role and their expected contribution to the development of Lisbon’s SUMP.

256

The second and third sessions were smaller sessions, focused on specific themes/issues raised by Lisbon’s SUMP team, related with its SUMP developing process and addressed on a joint discussion format together with the coach and the NFP (and, on the last session, the Deputy Mayor for Mobility). The main theme debated during these two sessions was the creation of the technical framework of a tender for supporting the development of Lisbon’s SUMP.

2.5 Training(s) One regular five-day training was organised in the project city of Lisbon. Another one-day extra training took place in Porto. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities/ People regions Regular 2018-10 - 15–19 Communication and stakeholder 14 47 Training involvement of the new SUMP - measures Monitoring and evaluation

Use pf public space

Freight transport (city logistics)

Extra 2019-05–22 Urban Transport Roadmaps 12 24 Training

The main impact of the first training was an increase of capacities in four different specific SUMP topics in 14 cities. The second training attracted 12 cities and was focused preferably on the urban transport roadmaps tools. The network opportunities between technicians form different municipalities but with (often) the same problems was also one of the key benefits from the training sessions.

257

- Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content - Regular blogging – In terms of the PROSPERITY project a blog is represented as a dedicated section on the respective city website, on a respective national SUMP platform website, or on the CIVITAS PROSPERITY website. Regular blogging on own experience with the whole SUMP process (both, planning and implementation) by city representatives, experts and NFP in their own local language to encourage follower cities in the own country to become active. - News and case studies - news and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework In 2019, Portugal presented the National Climate Energy Plan (PNEC), increasing the ambition to reduce the national GHG transport emissions, by 2030. The PNEC raises the former 2030 target, of 26% GHG transport emissions reduction (from 2005), to 40% GHG transport emissions reduction. This higher ambition comes hand-in-hand with the past three years update of several different aspects of the sustainable mobility legislative framework (decentralization of public transport management/creation of local transport authorities, creation of the Public Transport Fund, and regulations for transport-on-demand, shared mobility and the support program for fare reduction) although the adoption of SUMP remains non mandatory and no specific regulation for SUMP was issued during this period. Simultaneously, sbtween 2016 and 2019, CIVITAS PROSPERTY promoted the reflection on how the national sustainable mobility planning should be adapted to the evolving legislative framework, by providing several opportunities to debate and exchange best practices between stakeholders. The National Task Force, that includes designated representatives from the Vice Minister for Environment and Mobility, from IMT, from the Metropolitan Areas of Lisbon and Porto, from the National Portuguese Municipalities Association (ANMP) and from the Municipality of Lisbon, met four times to debate the measures to promote sustainable mobility planning in Portugal. The National Meetings on Sustainable Mobility Planning, held in Lisbon (September 2018) and Porto (May 2019) gathered, each, more than 50 participants, mostly from municipalities, CIMs and AMs, and provided an exchange of experiences as well as the conciliation of different visions and objectives between the different stakeholders that promote sustainable mobility planning. Finally, the PROSPERITY SUMP Trainings, carried out in Lisbon (4 days - October 2018) and Port (1/2 day – May 2019) allowed five sustainable mobility experts to share their knowledge with more than 65 trainees for more than 35 different cities. The recommendations that emerged from the above-mentioned debates contributed to the formulation of the National SUMP Programme Proposal, a document produced by IMT, that synthetizes the participation experience on CIVITAS PROSPERTY project for the past three years, and presents a proposal for the promotion of sustainable mobility planning in the period of 2019-2024.

258

The Programme is intended to be submitted, for consideration, to the Vice Minister for Environment and Mobility, in July 2019.

259

4 Financing In the past, the Portuguese Energy Efficiency Fund supported the elaboration of sustainable mobility planning, by financing the development of PMTs. At the same time, the access to Portugal 2020 Operational Regional Programmes required the adoption of SUMAPs. The allocation of direct funding to SUMPs elaboration is seen as a primary action to promote SUMPs and EU intervention can be important by increasing the financial support to SUMPs. The ongoing negotiations for the European regional funding framework after 2020 will determine much of the financial resources to promote SUMPs elaboration during that period. It is important to stress that the National Investment Programme 2021-2030 foresees important investments in sustainable mobility - without directly associating the investments to a mandatory SUMP - such as the expansion of Lisbon’s and Porto’s subway networks (1.065M€), the development of the public transport system (1.015M€), the promotion of electric mobility (360M€), the decarbonisation of urban freight logistics (450M€), the expansion of the national cycling network (300M€) and the promotion of urban multimodality (200M€). Sustainable mobility planning will be decisive to ensure the coordination of these set of measures and the PTF will promote the importance of sustainable mobility planning as a framework for the investments foreseen in the National Investment Programme. Finally, the recently created Public Transport Fund, although mainly targeted at empowering transport authorities and improving the transport system, also shares sustainability objectives and might promote specific sustainable mobility actions that will benefit the transport system efficiency, such as flexible transport planning.

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome In Portugal the main outcomes of the project are the elaboration of the National SUMP Programme Proposal, the creation of the National Task Force, and the contacts provided by the National SUMP Network that allowed, for instance the organization of the 1st and 2nd Sustainable Mobility Surveys (answered, in both cases, by more than 120 cities).

The two trainings and the two National Meeting on Sustainable Mobility Planning promoted by CIVITAS PROSPERITY project contributed to increase the knowledge of SUMPs among Portuguese cities and to share experiences and densify the network of technical contacts between mobility experts from different cities. The main impact of the coaching sessions was the support to the development of Lisbon’s SUMP, namely by being able to bring together different departments and services from the municipality. Lisbon’s SUMP is scheduled to be concluded in 2021. The NFP participation on CIVITAS PROSPERITY provided an intense exchange of experiences between national, regional and local entities that play a role on SUMP. This exchange of experiences has provided the bases for the NFP to begin an internal reflection on the update of the Portuguese Mobility Package.

260

What worked well? The collaboration between the NFP and the other members of the NTF, providing a joint organization of almost all events promoted during the CIVITAS PROSPERITY project. The training sessions registered a high participation from cities and the training evaluations were very good. What did not work well? The ministry delegated its NTF participation on the NFP. Continuation of the SUMP programme If the National SUMP Programme Proposal is approved, the National Task Force members will be invited to form the Programme Task Force (PTF) that will coordinate the implementation of the Programme throughout its validity (2019-2024). The PTF intends to hold Programme Coordination meetings twice a year.

261

Appendix

Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main agenda Main agenda: fill 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of other Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Launch 2017- Preparation of National Strategic Awareness Lisbon Portugal 7 Meeting 05 SUMP Programme planning raising Second 2018- Preparation of National Exchange of Awareness Lisbon Portugal 8 Meeting 06 SUMP Programme experience raising 2019 National 2018- Third Meeting Lisbon Portugal 5 Other SUMP meeting Other 12 preparation 2019- Preparation of National Strategic Awareness 4th meeting Lisbon Portugal 8 03 SUMP Programme planning raising

262

I Encontro http://www.imt- Nacional ip.pt/sites/IMTT/Portug ues/Noticias/Paginas/En sobre o controMobilidade21set 2018.aspx Exchange of Awareness Capacity Planeament 2018-09 no Lisbon Portugal 64 https://docs.google.com organiser /forms/d/1uk4OxqskXJt experience raising building o da MJEhxSYjgJ3hkP1GN4N 6Pupaqi0q_wz8/viewfor Mobilidade m?ts=5b757556&edit_r Sustentável equested=true II Encontro http://www.i Nacional 65 mt- sobre o (pre- ip.pt/sites/I Exchange of Awareness Capacity Planeament 2019-05 no Porto Portugal event MTT/Portug organiser experience raising building o da estima ues/Noticias/ Mobilidade te) Paginas/II- Sustentável ENPMS.aspx

263

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

1 conference CIVITAS Forum Conference 2017 2017-09 yes yes Torres Vedras Portugal

4th European Conference on Sustainable conference 2 2017-03 yes yes Dubrovnik Croatia Urban Mobility Plans 1st Coaching Prosperity - Exchange of training/seminar/workshop 3 2018-03 no no Lisbon Portugal experience workshop Open Day Público - A caminho das conference 4 2018-05 yes no Gaia Portugal Ecocidades

training/seminar/workshop 5 Acessibilidades no Baixo Alentejo 2018-06 no no Beja Portugal

Transporte Flexível - Solução de conference 6 2018-10 no no Sardoal Portugal Mobilidade Sustainable Mobility for Youth and training/seminar/workshop 7 2018-09 no no Lisbon Portugal Children Prosperity and SUMP (target: municipal training/seminar/workshop 8 2019-01 no no Lisbon Portugal mobility professionals) Presentation of the SUMP ToR for meeting 9 2019-01 no no Lisbon Portugal monitoring comittee

264

Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

Mobility workshop at Hospital (Paediatric training/seminar/workshop 10 2019-02 no no Lisbon Portugal unit) SUMP/Mobility presentation at high other 11 2019-03 no no Lisbon Portugal school Presentation of the SUMP ToR for meeting 12 2019-04 no yes Lisbon Portugal monitoring comittee

265

1 primary primary

2 primary primary

3 primary primary

4 primary primary primary

5 primary secondary primary

6 primary secondary primary primary

secondar 7 secondary secondary primary y

8 N/A primary secondary

9 primary secondary primary

10 primary

11 primary

266

No. Politicians and Urban mobility SUMP contracts Stakeholders SUMP Mainstream General Private Other decision professionals caretakers and in the public initiatives and public sectors sector makers on EMW sector networks specialised stakeholders professio local and coordinators and media nals national level within platforms municipalities

12 primary

267

1 500 http://civitas.eu/forum2017 active participation

http://www.eltis.org/participate/events/4th-european- 2 conference-sustainable-urban-mobility-plans active participation

Exchange of 3 40 active participation Awareness raising Capacity building experience

4 100 https://www.publico.pt/openday-gaia active participation Awareness raising

http://www.cm- Exchange of 5 50 beja.pt/docs/ImagensDC/Noticias/2018/Seminario_acessib active participation ilidades_.pdf experience

6 100 http://www.tr-eventos.com/transporteflexivel/ active participation Awareness raising Capacity building

https://www.google.pt/search?biw=1777&bih=841&tb m=isch&sa=1&ei=ai3QXIWBKYLka5- SuNgG&q=conferencia+maos+ao+ar+lisboa+semana 7 46 +europeia+mobilidade&oq=conferencia+maos+ao+ar organiser Awareness raising Other +lisboa+semana+europeia+mobilidade&gs_l=img.3...5 6997.58433..58808...0.0..0.84.506.7...... 0....1..gws- wiz-img.D1wRl10Ngto#imgrc=oMbyokX9fP9qZM:

8 74 active participation Awareness raising Capacity building

9 18 organiser Strategic planning Awareness raising Other

10 20 active participation Awareness raising

268

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords (choose Keywords (choose Keywords (choose one) one) one)

https://www.facebook.com/apeepedronunes/photos/a.84 11 50 7680268746849/1169558549892351?type=3&sfns=mo

12 20

269

Dissemination Target groups

level

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Prosperity Brochure - Apoiando autoridades locais e nacionais Prospe seco seco brochu para second rity nation 2017-09 primary ndar ndar re melhorar a ary promo al y y qualidade e tion a aceitação dos Planos de Mobilidade e Transportes

270

Target groups

level

/ Name of media of / Name

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Prospe seco seco Prosperity second rity nation poster 2017-09 primary ndar ndar Poster ary promo al y y tion Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content.

Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. www.imt- websit ip.pt

e www.cm- lisboa.pt/ Prospe target ot rity nation ed e- 2018-08 primary h promo al mails er tion

271

Target groups

level

/ Name of media of / Name

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Prospe target ot rity nation ed e- 2019-04 primary h promo al mails er tion Prospe http://sump- websit sump- second rity intern network.eu/cities- 2018-11 primary e network.eu ary promo ational countries/lisbon/#c1 091 tion SUMP websit sump- intern http://sump- 2019-03 primary primary inform network.eu/ambassa e network.eu ational ation dors/

Regular blogging seco seco SUMP m second prim intern https://www.instagra SUMP.PT 2018-01 primary ndar ndar inform o ary ary ational m.com/sump.pt/ y y ation nt

272

Target groups

level

/ Name of media of / Name

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link hl y

News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website National SUMP Training seco SUMP http://www.eltis.org/p second prim articipate/events/nati for 2018-02 primary ndar inform ary ary onal-sump-training- Portugu y ation portuguese-cities ese Cities Particip ate at the http://www.eltis.org/p Portugu seco SUMP second prim articipate/events/par ese 2018-09 primary ndar inform ticipate-portuguese- ary ary National y ation national-meeting- sumps Meeting on SUMPs

273

274

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Romania

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV Responsible Co-Author: Irina Rotaru | Cities on the Move

Date: July 2019

Status: Final

275

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 277

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME’S MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 277

2.1 THE SUMP NATIONAL TASK FORCE ...... 277

2.2 SUMP NATIONAL NETWORK ...... 279

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 282

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 283

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 284

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 285

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 285

4 FINANCING ...... 286

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 287

APPENDIX ...... 289

276

2 SUMP Promo Programme’s main achievements This chapter provides an overview of main achievements that make up the SUMP Promo Programme. A basic overview is given in the text, more detailed information is provided in Appendix of this report.

2.1 The SUMP national Task Force (TF) as understood in the framework of Civitas PROSPERITY The SUMP national Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. It should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP- s have the task to start-up the TFs. There are 4 essentials to understand the TF: (45) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the higher level (national or regional) public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institution/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’), but when the referred competences are regionalised, it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (46) Committed: means that the TF has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that ideally this body should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (47) Prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task.This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the TF to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (48) The SUMP national programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial

277

conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The SUMP national programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Ministry of Regional Director, Department for Liviu Development and Public Policy and Strategy [email protected] BĂILEȘTEANU Administration

Ministry of Regional Councillor, Regional Adina FLOREA Development and Public Operational Programme [email protected] Administration Directorate urban mobility expert and Monica evaluator (former UM Independent expert [email protected] OREVICEANU responsible Ministry of Regional Development)

Violeta Coordinator Civinet Romania Civinet Romania [email protected] MIHALACHE and Director Urban Survey Centru Regional Development Agency, ROP Head of ROP Programming & Tudor UDREA [email protected] Programming & Monitoring Monitoring Office Office Councillor, Urban Centru Regional Development Department Adrian PURCARU [email protected] Development Agency (Former Mayor of Azuga Municipality) STB SA (Bucharest public Head of International Florin DRAGOMIR [email protected] transport company) Projects Department STB SA (Bucharest public Liliana ANDREI Automotive Engineer [email protected] transport company) Technical University of Civil Professor and Urban mobility Oana LUCA Engineering of Bucharest [email protected] expert (UTCB) European Integrated Lucia CRISTEA Managing Director [email protected] Projects (EIP) ”Ion Mincu” University of Associate Professor, Mihaela Architecture and Urban coordinator of Urban Mobility [email protected] NEGULESCU Planning (UAUIM), Master Bucharest

278

Name Organisation Function Email OPTAR – Organisation for Marian IVAN Alternative Transport in President [email protected] Romania Ovidiu ROMOȘAN Impact Consulting SRL Director [email protected] Ion DUMITRU Proteus Diona Brașov President [email protected]

Civitta / European Sustainable Mobility Project Lucian ZAGAN [email protected] Integrated Projects (EIP) Manager Cristian GHINEȘ City of Bacău Independent City Councillor [email protected]

Antonio City Local Councillor for City of Bucharest, Sector 4 [email protected] ANDRUSCEAC Sector 4 Bucharest Councillor of Deputy Cătălin Horațiu COSMA Chamber of Deputies [email protected] DRULĂ Dacia SĂPĂTORU Municipality of Făgăraș Energy Efficiency Unit [email protected] Irina ROTARU Cities on the Move President [email protected] Simona Cities on the Move Deputy President [email protected] ZĂRNESCU

Task Force meetings In Romania, four Task Force meetings were held during the project time, prepared and complemented by numerous online exchanges. The discussions and contributions referred to the following main aspects: - The identification of the recurrent problems related to the SUMP that need to be solved - The distinction of the principal strong points and levels that could be enhanced / used in order to improve the level of adoption and the efficacy of the SUMPs - The preparation, content and promotion of the SUMP national programme - The funding scheme for the SUMP and the SUMP programme - The monitoring and evaluation of the SUMPs (criteria, indicators, tools, responsible bodies etc) - The preparation and accreditation of urban mobility/SUMP experts and the involvement of the Universities in the SUMP process - The methodological framework and legislative changes needed

The NTF proved to be very successful. It gathers various profiles and points of view and helped to create a comprehensive picture of the actual situation and improvement possibilities. It also benefited from the presence and support of the Regional Development Ministry that should adopt the SUMP National programme. Its main weakness is given by the fact that it has not a dedicated funding allocated (fact making difficult the face to face meetings as well as its promotion). The NFP initiated and organised the activity of the NTF, but its resources being very limited it is going to be even more difficult to support this activity on an exclusively voluntary basis after the finalisation of Civitas PROSPERITY. 2.2 SUMP National network

279

The build up of sustainable national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By ‘National SUMP Network’ term is meant a national network that actively supports its members in the preparation and implementation of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. that ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed.

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network SUMP National Network (Rețeaua Națională pentru PMUD) Host of the network Contact name E-mail address / Tel. number Cities on the Move (CiMo) Simona Zărnescu & [email protected] Irina Rotaru +40 744 768 248 Membership Cities/regions Other institutions Romanian cities and municipalities Civinet Romania Regional Development Agencies Urban mobility and sustainable development NGOs (like OPTAR, The Association for Urban transition, DIONA, ADD Urbania etc.) Urban Mobility Companies (like FIP Consulting, Civitta, EIP etc.) Universities (like ”Ion Mincu” Architecture and Urbanism University; Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest) Professional associations of Architects in Chief (of municipalities and towns, of counties) Public Transport Companies (in major Romanian cities)

280

Since the PROSPERITY project started (September 2016), the total number of Romanian network members trebled. Furthermore, new entities like universities, public transport companies, urban mobility NGOs and consultancy companies joined supporting it through their contributions.

281

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

The city activation strategy was in particular designed for cities to join national existing or newly established SUMPs networks. As these networks have been already established in most of Prosperity countries within Endurance project, city activation is not needed any more in countries where national SUMP networks work well. For the rest of countries it is recommended to use the principles of it. It is relevant especially in Croatia and Cyprus which were not Endurance partners. During Civitas PROSPERITY, 11 new Romanian city files and 2 updated ones have been prepared for being published on the ENDURANCE website. Furthermore, 5 additional ones are going to be delivered until the end of the project (August 31st). City files (including in each case the contact details of the persons responsible with urban mobility issues and SUMP) are available on the ENDURANCE project website at: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

282

2.4 Coachings Threecoachings were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 06.02.2018 Correlation, communication Făgăraș 8 and implementation of SUMP measures & Parking management Coaching 2 23.04.2018 The optimisation of SUMP Făgăraș 7 for small and medium size + informal cities; coaching session street design & on the occasion participative processes of the training Coaching 3 21.01.2019 the organisation and Făgăraș 8 implementation urban mobility campaigns & the involvement of various stakeholders for supporting urban mobility measures

A. the 1st coaching session had as major themes: 1. the correlation, communication and implementation of measures included in the SUMP 2. parking management It was meant to support the optimisation of the 3 projects for which Fagaras asked for funding in the framework of the Regional Operational Programme and the presentation of Fagaras on the occasion of the RPOSPERITY training in April

B. the 2nd coaching session benefited from the presence of Vitoria Gasteiz’s representative, Mr. Juan Carlos Escudero and referred to: 1. the optimisation of SUMP for small and medium size cities; 2. street design and 3. participative processes It supported the implementation, work with and periodical actualisation of the SUMP.

C. the 3rd coaching session focused on: 1. the organisation and implementation urban mobility campaigns meant to promote sustainable urban transport, public transport and non-polluting means of transport (walking, cycling etc.) 2. the involvement of various stakeholders for supporting urban mobility measures So that to help Făgăraș in the preparation and implementation of the actions in the European Mobility Week in correlation with and for the promotion of the measures included in the SUMP as well as in the preparation of the applications for various related awards like the EMW Award.

283

Furthermore, a general overview was made on the contribution of Făgăraș to Civitas PROSPERITY, how the local administration used the input from the project and which benefits / outcomes it got from its involvement. This coaching session ended with a general discussion regarding the possible continuation of activities and the maximisation of the positive impact of the project by using its results to support the sustainable development of Făgăraș. The main impact of coaching session was that they provided a better understanding of the SUMP philosophy and fostered regular communication and exchanges on urban mobility issues between the representatives of various departments as well as between political decision makers and technicians. 2.5 Training(s) One four-day training was organised in Romanian city of Brasov. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2018-04 The SUMP and its framework and 19 28 Training – 24-27 support measures in Romania and its associated SUMP National taskforce Urban Transport Roadmaps tool

Communication and stakeholder involvement SUMP for small and medium size cities The use of public space and SUMP Good practices from the champion city Sint Niklaas The Superblocks scheme and the SUMP of the Champion City Vitoria Gasteiz Good practices from the champion city Sint Niklaas SUMP good practices from Romania (Turda – European SUMP award 2017, Făgăraș, Oradea, Reghin) According to the trainees’ declarations (collected immediately after the training and about one year after, spring 2019), due to its tailor-made (informed and shaped depending on the preliminary comprehensive survey on the situation and needs in the field in Romania) and interactive character, the training improved the SUMP knowledge and capacities of Romanian cities and experts. It fostered the diffusion of best practices in the field and strengthened exchanges between the various levels of public administration as well as between different related sectors and between peers (at technical and political level).

284

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework In Romania, the content and approval procedure of the urban planning and spatial development documents including the ones for the SUMPs are detailed in the implementation guide adopted through the Order of MDRAP Minister no. 233/2016 following the revision of the urban planning and spatial development low no 350/2001 through the law 190/2013. The Order of MDRAP Minister no. 233/2016 officially regulated for the first time the SUMP as compulsory chapter of the General Urban Plan (GUP). This first step has ensured the shift from the mobility planning practice through traffic studies meant to substantiate urban planning and spatial development to participatory and integrative planning in which the role of monitoring and evaluation of the effects of the applied measures becomes determinant in setting priorities for action as well as for the promotion and financing of investments. However, this legislative framework provides no procedures regarding the monitoring and evaluation of the SUMPs or their correlation with different instruments in related fields such as energy efficiency, prevention of and adaptation to climate changes or the reduction of negative effect in (earthquake, flooding landslide, avalanche, etc.) risk areas. Therefore, new adaptations are needed in order to better follow the European policy guidelines and legislative best practices in the field. The aim is to allow the balanced development of all kind of settlements by also considering the national context and the variety of particular situations, besides the general European framework and recommendations in the field.

285

4 Financing The preparation, implementation and revision of the SUMPs, and especially its corresponding monitoring and evaluation processes are necessitating large amounts of money and complex practical activities of data collection and management. Therefore, their funding implies the design of multiple sources financial mechanisms. Positive results are conditioned by financing the entire SUMP process (including its implementation and monitoring), not only its preparation and promotion phase. The complex financing mechanism proposed through the SUMP national programme refers to the integrated funding of those instruments together with the energy efficiency plans, the ones for risk prevention and the ones for climate change adaptation. The preparation of the first SUMP in compliance with the European Commission methodology (for the 8 growth poles + the capital, Bucharest) was funded from European money (through the Regional Operational Programme 2007-2017). The existence of approved PMUDs is already a prerequisite for obtaining European source funding for infrastructure. Some other categories of localities besides growth poles, obtained funds under the 2013 - 2020 Regional Operational Program (ROP) amounting to 2.3 billion Euros. However, many lower-ranking localities have funded their SUMPs from local money and stakeholder participation, and plan to undergo further qualification stages for obtaining European money for their implementation.

The SUMP National Program has to be included among the priorities of the 2020-2027 phase EU funding, especially with regard to the preparation and implementation of the functional / metropolitan area SUMPs and of the ones for medium and small sized cities in correlation with spatial development and configuration (urban planning and spatial development) and Sustainable Energy Action Plans (SEAP). The 2013 - 2020 EU funds can provide punctual funding for various measures through thematic sector or research - innovation sources such as CIVITAS, INTERREG, Horizon 2020, Urban Innovative Actions, URBACT, cross-border programs or DANUBE. Small towns with limited funding opportunities will be encouraged and financially supported by the program to participate in partnerships with medium and large cities and municipalities.

The SUMP national programme’s general framework and funding mechanism will be provided by the Ministry for Regional Development in close collaboration with Ministry of Finance and Ministry for European Funds associating all available governmental and European funding.

A full package for the entire program period will seek to identify all possible sources and provide funding for the priority actions of the approved documentation in conjunction with the GUP and SEAP 2020-2030 and will include monitoring, evaluation and updating tools and activities.

286

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome The SUMP national programme initiated and promoted through Civitas PROSPERITY promoted a project culture shift defining new responsibilities, more clear roles and adapted indicators. The numerous international exchanges enabled through it offered valuable inspiration, motivating people at various levels to assume a role in the SUMP preparation, promotion and implementation. Under the influence of PROSPERITY, the Regional Development Agencies (and especially the Centre one directly involved in the international exchanges) started to assume a more powerful role in the preparation and promotion of the general SUMP national framework. They participated actively in the meetings of the SUMP NTF providing valuable insights from the territory and contributing to the drafting of the dedicated national programme.

What worked well? The training and coaching sessions, webinars and experience exchanges provided in this context led to the diversification of the SUMP better adapted to the local and national specificieties and needs. The NTF proved to be very successful. It gathers various profiles and points of view and helped to create a comprehensive picture of the actual situation and improvement possibilities. It also benefited from the presence and support of the Regional Development Ministry that should adopt the SUMP National programme.

What did not work well? The lack of compulsory regulations set by the EU regarding sustainable urban development is making it hard to implement sustainable urban mobility measures and planning documents in the EU countries. This is especially visible in new EU countries, like Romania, that still lack of expertise. The main weakness of the NTF is given by the fact that it has not allocated a dedicated funding (fact making difficult the face to face meetings as well as its promotion). The NFP initiated and organised the activity of the NTF, but its resources being very limited it is going to be even more difficult to support this activity on an exclusively voluntary basis after the finalisation of Civitas PROSPERITY.

Facilitation of continued development of National SUMP Programmes Maintenance of the NTF as an urban mobility exchange platform and advising body enabling the communication between the various governance levels and sectors for the optimization of the effectiveness of SUMPs as operational tools;  Increased focus on the livelong monitoring and evaluation of the SUMPs with a more clear framework and identification of the competencies of the experts able to carry out this process;  Definition of a national level body in charge with the management of the SUMP National programme;  Associated funding scheme for the SUMP National programme;

287

 Public national level evidence on the state of the art in the urban mobility field and SUMP adoption and implementation;  Integration of the various urban management measures in various fields (urban mobility, land use, energy efficiency and climate change adaptation) into an unitary plan / 3D model

The entire process of adoption of the SUMP national programme could be optimised and accelerated if a special guideline or recommendation or request / condition would be formulated at European level in this sense. If there is not a higher level obligation to provide a framework, even if everybody agrees on its necessity, importance and high utility, it is not going to become a priority so easily.

288

Appendix

Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main Main agenda: fill other 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of agenda Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Presentation of the NTF and of the Civitas PROSPERITY Discussion of the main problems related to the preparation, promotion Launch 2017- online Romania 20 and implementation of the Meeting 02 SUMPs in Romania Identification of strong points and possible Organisation and development of the SUMP national network Discussion of the main problems related to the preparation, promotion Second 2018- and implementation of the Bucharest Romania Meeting 06 SUMPs in Romania Identification of strong points and possible levers for improving the SUMPs

289

Task Force Date City Country Number Main Main agenda: fill other 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of agenda Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Presentation and discussion of the SUMP national programme 2018- Third Meeting Bucharest Romania Collection of ideas for the 10 first draft of the SUMP national programme in Romania Refinement/Finalisation of 2019 - the SUMP national Forth Meeting Bucharest Romania 05 programme – discussion of the various proposals

290

National SUMP promo events 2nd Numb 1st 3rd Multiple Link to NFP´s interaction Objective(s) Name of the er of Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Date -day City Country event- / Other parties / Keywords event attend Keywords Keywords event website involved (choose ees (choose one) (choose one) one) SUMP promo event in the https://civi framework of tas.eu/ev Collaboration of the Traffic ent/works 2017-10 no Timisoara Romania 30 NFP with Civinet management hop- Romania conference by civinet- Civinet & romania FLOW project Organised by NFP (CiMo) and hosted by the national promo Ministry of 2018-06 yes Bucharest Romania 60 event Regional Development and Public Administration joint promo event 2018-10 no Bucharest Romania 70 PROSPERITY - SUMPs-Up national promo Organised by 2019-05 yes Bucharest Romania 30 event NFP (CiMo) and

291

2nd Numb 1st 3rd Multiple Link to NFP´s interaction Objective(s) Name of the er of Objective(s) / Objective(s) / Date -day City Country event- / Other parties / Keywords event attend Keywords Keywords event website involved (choose ees (choose one) (choose one) one) hosted by The Building Engineering University A series of presentations of the SUMP concept, of the SUMP national programme, of the innovation itinerant promo Multiple 2019-07 yes Romania 50 briefs produced in event cities the framework of Civitas PROSPERITY and of the results of the project – kept in various Romanian cities

292

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event 37th annual meeting of Urban 1 « Territoires no(s) limite(s) » 2016-10 yes yes Bayonne France Agencies Saint-Jean de international workshop 2 "New territories. New mobilities" 2016-10 no yes Luz / Saint- Spain Sébastien "Quel partage de la voirie urbaine dans un éco-quartier pour favoriser la Paris tech lectures and workshop on 3 mobilité durable?" (What repartition 2016-10 yes yes Paris France eco conception of urban roads in an ecoquartier for favouring sustainable mobility?) World Summit for inclusive, innovative 4 “Cities for Life” 2016-11 yes yes Paris France and resilient cities 1st meeting of the EU platform on 5 SUMP EU platform 2016-11 no yes Brussels Belgium SUMP Urban mobility workshop focusing on the functional accessibility and “Réinventer le modèle mobilité-ville” 6 2016-11 no yes Paris France connectivity of cities and their (Reinventing the mobility-city model) different parts “Nouvelles proximités : mobilités, Matinée d’etudes (sustainable énergies, matières “ (New mobility workshop) organised by 7 2016-11 no yes Paris France proximities: mobilities, energies, l’Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée tools)

293

Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event “La fabrique de l'innovation publique” Public innovation festival 8 2016-11 yes yes Paris France (Public innovation factory/making) conference and workshop organised “Building the foundation for future 9 2017 - 09 yes yes Bucharest Romania by CREATE project mobility in Europe” "Construire l'Europe des Lieux et 38th annual meeting of Urban 10 des Liens" (Building the Europe of 2017-11 yes yes Strasbourg France Agencies places and connections)

19th Urban Projects Forum 11 19th Forum des projets urbains 2017-11 no yes Paris France

Real Estate Fair 12 le SIMI 2017 2017-12 no yes Paris France

“Transport regional durabil – urban mobility workshop organised by provocări și soluții” (Sustainable 13 2018-03 yes no Brasov Romania Brasov Metropolitan Agency Regional transport – challenges and solutions) Global Health. Biodiversité, santé des 7th annual conference of EIR-A écosystèmes, santé humaine École internationale de recherche 14 2018-03 yes yes Lyon France Global Health. Biodiversity, d’Agreenium ecosystems’ health, people health European projects. Civitas Lecture on Civitas PROSPERITY 15 2018-05 no yes Lyon France PROSPERITY

Multiple events 16 Sustainable Development Festival 2018-05/06 yes yes Milan Italy

294

Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event “Metode de sporire a eficienței International workshop / seminary transportului public local” (Methods to 17 2018-06 no yes Oradea Romania organised by Civinet increase local public transport efficiency) 24th International Conference on Urban Planning and Regional «IS THIS THE REAL WORLD? Development in the Information 18 “Perfect Smart Cities” vs. “Real 2019-04 yes yes Karlsruhe Germany Society Geo Multimedia 2019, a co- Emotional Cities”» operation of KIT, ISOCARP and CORP «Mobilitatea urbană durabilă – International conference organised by Componentă a dezvoltării urbane. Centru Development Agency in the Evoluții și perspective» / 19 2019-04 no yes Brasov Romania framework of the Interreg European «Sustainable Urban Mobility – project CHESTNUT Component of Urban Development. Evolutions and Perspectives» international conference organised by the French NGO “Urbanistes du 20 Mobilités créactives 2019-04 no yes Paris France monde” international conference organised by CLIMA 2019. Built Environment the European association of Facing Climate Change installation engineers (AIIR) in 21 2019-05 yes yes Bucharest Romania https://www.clima2019.org/ cooperation with the Romanian Ministry of Regional Development and https://www.clima2019.org/congress/

295

Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event other national and international organisations International placemaking event referring to public space, urban 22 European Placemaking Week 2019-06 yes yes Valencia Spain mobility and cities liveability International event for sustainable 23 The Urban Mobility Summit 2019-10 yes yes Paris France mobility solutions

296

Table 2/3 –Target groups No. Politicians and Urban mobility SUMP contracts Stakeholders SUMP Mainstream General Private Other sector decision professionals caretakers and in the public initiatives and public sectors professionals makers on EMW sector networks specialised stakeholders local and coordinators and media national level within platforms municipalities Academia Specialised (including PhD 1 yes yes yes yes yes no yes media only and Master students) Academia Specialised (including PhD 2 yes yes yes yes yes no yes media only and Master students) Academia (including PhD, 3 no yes yes yes yes no no yes Master & licence students) Academia Specialised (including PhD 4 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes media only and Master students)

5 no yes no no yes no no no

Academia 6 yes yes yes yes yes no no yes (including PhD,

297

8 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

9 yes yes yes yes yes no no yes

Academia Specialised (including PhD 10 yes yes yes yes yes no yes media only and Master students) Not Specialised 11 yes yes Not specifically yes no yes specifically media only Not Specialised 12 yes yes Not specifically yes no yes specifically media only

13 yes yes yes yes yes no no yes

Not Specialised Academia 14 yes yes Not specifically yes no yes specifically media only (including PhD

298

No. Politicians and Urban mobility SUMP contracts Stakeholders SUMP Mainstream General Private Other sector decision professionals caretakers and in the public initiatives and public sectors professionals makers on EMW sector networks specialised stakeholders local and coordinators and media national level within platforms municipalities and Master students) Academia Not (including PhD 15 yes yes Not specifically yes no no yes specifically and Master students) Academia Not (including PhD 16 yes yes Not specifically yes yes yes yes specifically and Master students) Not 17 yes yes Not specifically yes no no yes specifically Academia Not Specialised (including PhD 18 yes yes Not specifically yes no yes specifically media only and Master students)

19 yes yes yes yes yes no no yes

Academia Not Specialised (including PhD 20 yes yes Not specifically yes no yes specifically media only and Master students)

299

No. Politicians and Urban mobility SUMP contracts Stakeholders SUMP Mainstream General Private Other sector decision professionals caretakers and in the public initiatives and public sectors professionals makers on EMW sector networks specialised stakeholders local and coordinators and media national level within platforms municipalities Academia Not Specialised (including PhD 21 yes yes Not specifically yes no yes specifically media only and Master students) Academia Not Specialised (including PhD 22 yes yes Not specifically yes no yes specifically media only and Master students) Academia Specialised (including PhD 23 yes yes yes yes yes no yes media only and Master students)

300

Table 3/3 –Additional information No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose (choose one) one) one)

exchanges with the other http://37eme- participants especially regarding 1 Cca 600 rencontre.audap.org urban and trans-border mobility and SUMP http://www.fnau.org/fr/r presentation of the Civitas 2 40 encontre/communique- Prosperity project + exchanges with de-presse-37e-rencontre/ the other participants https://atikteam.s3.amazon aws.com/552837c8166197f 098d7918c63d14d/1478091 7327A7hXhRqlIwRZbtnxHLIs 1rDebZb2OIs2oozQpiGQcSJ DOAASc?AWSAccessKeyId= AKIAJRRAGXI4N6PIQGVQ&E exchanges with the participants 3 120 xpires=2147483647&Signat regarding the SUMP and Civitas ure=WVyTuV14aliWUa2JLcI Prosperity approach and solutions BAQ%2BUDpY%3D https://adage- environnement.com/media/ files/Les_Productions_du_F orum_EcoQuartier_28_juin_ 2016.pdf

301

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose (choose one) one) one)

http://www.paca.developpe ment- durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/ce rema_ecoquartiers_mobilite _stationnement2016_11_28 .pdf exchanges with the other https://quefaire.paris.fr/3 participants + presentation of 4 700 955/cities-for-life Civitas Prosperity approach and activities https://www.eltis.org/mo Exchanges with the other European bility-plans/european- projects on SUMP (principally platform/Coordinating- focusing on the SUMP evolution 5 30 Group-members and new https://www.eltis.org/mo guidelines/updates/initiatives to bility-plans/european- promote) platform http://www.club-ville- amenagement.org/_uplo exchanges with the participants ad/ressources/production 6 200 regarding the SUMP and Civitas s/5a7/2016/cva_2016_fly Prosperity approach er_5a7_mobilite_ville_14 1116.pdf

302

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose (choose one) one) one)

exchanges with the other https://umrausser.hypot participants + presentation of 7 45 heses.org/5024 Civitas Prosperity approach and activities https://openagenda.co m/_916/events/la- fabrique-de-l- innovation-publique-17- au-19-novembre- participation in the various 2016?lang=en workshops and discussions + 8 450 https://www.modernisati presentation of the Civitas on.gouv.fr/la-semaine- Prosperity approach regarding de-linnovation- innovation publique/revivez-la- semaine-de- linnovation-publique- 2016 https://civitas.eu/es/eve Introduction of the Civitas nt/building-foundation- 9 30 PROSPERITY project and of its future-mobility- approach to innovation european-cities http://38eme- exchanges with the participants 10 400 rencontre.adeus.org/ regarding the SUMP and Civitas

303

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose (choose one) one) one)

Prosperity philosophy, innovation approach and solutions exchanges with the participants http://www.projetsurbai regarding the SUMP and the 11 850 ns.com/ innovation approach and solutions proposed by Civitas Prosperity 30 373 visitors + exchanges with the participants 467 city and http://www.salonsimi.co regarding the SUMP and the 12 public m/presse/cp-bilan-2017/ innovation approach and solutions companies proposed by Civitas Prosperity representatives Introduction of the Civitas PROSPERITY project and of its 13 40 approach to innovation + exchanges with the participants Plenary presentation of Civitas https://www.agreenium. PROSPERITY and its approach to 14 450 fr/page/7eme- make cities more liveable and seminaire-eir healthy by improving the SUMPs Event dedicated to the presentation 15 30 of Civitas PROSPERITY

304

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose (choose one) one) one)

Introduction of the Civitas Different events https://festivalsviluppos PROSPERITY project and of its with between 50 16 ostenibile.it/2018/englis approach to sustainability and and 300 h/ innovation + exchanges with the attendees each participants Presentation of Civitas https://civitas.eu/event/ PROSPERITY and of the SUMP metode-de-sporire- national taskforce developed in this 17 35 eficientei-transportului- context and its activities related to public-local the preparation of a SUMP dedicated national programme presentation of the reviewed scientific article «Real “Smart Cities”. Insights from Civitas https://conference.corp. PROSPERITY»; exchanges with 18 470 at/index.php?id=4&L=0 other European and international participants; distribution of the PROSPERITY leaflets and innovation briefs (English language) http://www.adrcentru.ro/ key-note speech on the SUMP proiecte- National programme developed in 19 35 regionale/invitatie-la- Romania in the framework of Civitas conferinta-mobilitatea- PROSPERITY, distribution of the

305

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose (choose one) one) one)

urbana-durabila- PROSPERITY leaflets and componenta-a- innovation briefs (English and dezvoltarii-urbane- Romanian languages) integrate-evolutii-si- perspective/ Pencha Cucha presentation on Civitas PROSPERITY, focusing on https://urbanistesdumo the participation and benefits of nde.com/fr/nos- 20 45 Fagaras from this experience, evenements/seminaire- distribution of the PROSPERITY des-partenaires-2019 leaflets and innovation briefs (English and French languages) presentation of the reviewed paper «From Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to Operational Energy Policies and Measures for https://www.clima2019. the City of Tomorrow», topic: org/ “Sustainable Urbanization and 21 932 https://www.clima2019. Energy System Integration”, org/congress/ Subtopic “Enhancing the capacity of public authorities to plan and implement sustainable energy policies and measures”; distribution of the PROSPERITY leaflets and

306

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords Keywords (choose Keywords (choose (choose one) one) one)

innovation briefs (English and Romanian languages); exchanges with other participants https://lamarinalivinglab Presentation of Civitas .com/placemakingweek PROSPERITY, of its innovation 22 450 europe2019/ aspects and of the innovation briefs https://placemaking- produced in this context europe.eu/ Presentation of the approach, https://urbanmobilitydail results and insights of Civitas 23 Expected 600 y.com/summit/ PROSPERITY + distribution of the final brochure (English)

307

Dissemination Target groups

s s and

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretaker municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Catego Kind media of / Title Name date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project Civitas PROSPERITY & July x x x x x x x x academia SUMPs-Up joint 2017 leaflet June Final brochure x x x x x x x x academia 2019 Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Urban mobility video (prepared for the training in April x x x x x x Romania with the 2018 support of Mega Cities ShortDocs) Training promo June x x x x x x clip 2018

308

Target groups

s s and

Catego Kind media of / Title Name date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Oct 2018 webinars - x x x x x x x x x Febr 2019 Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. e- Romanian Towns http://www.aor. new Association ro/ x x x x x x x x slett er Fagaras website x x x x x x x x Centru Regional Development x x x x x x x x Agency website Civinet x x x x x x x

Regular blogging

309

Target groups

s s and

Catego Kind media of / Title Name date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link

News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website

310

SUMP Promotion Program D6.4

Sweden

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Author: Ulf Pilerot | Swedish transport administration

Date: August 2019

Status: Final

311

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 313

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 313

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 313

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 314

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 316

2.4 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 317

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... FOUT! BLADWIJZER NIET GEDEFINIEERD.

4 FINANCING ...... 318

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 319

APPENDIX ...... 320

312

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (49) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (50) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (51) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogrammeme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programmeme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (52) The national SUMP programmeme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programmeme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

313

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Swedish Head of the Task Force, TF Ulf Pilerot transport [email protected] member, Prosperity partner administration Swedish Rami Yones TF member transport [email protected] administration Swedish Mathias TF member, Prosperity mathias.warnhjelm@trafikver transport Wärnhjelm partner ket.se administration Swedish victoria.stridsman@trafikverk Victoria Stridsman TF member transport et.se administration Swedish sven.hunhammar@trafikverk Sven Hunhammar TF member transport et.se administration Patrik Tornberg TF member KTH [email protected] Andreas Nordin TF member Malmö [email protected] Region of mattias.landin@regionvarmla Mattias Landin TF member Värmland nd.se Björn Wendle TF member Trivector [email protected] National board Magnus Jacobsson TF member magnus.jacobsson@boverke of housing t.se

Task Force meetings Seven Task Force meetings were held during the project. The main points of the meeting were the preparation of National SUMP Programme, exchange of experience and elaboration on quality assessment. The main output of the Task Force's work is the SUMP Programme and the commitment to the Task Force to continue its work beyond the PROSPERITY project. The national taskforce contents representatives from regions, cities, consultants and three national administrations, all together about 30 persons. There were four IRL-meetings for the whole group and a large number of meetings in each smaller group. In these meetings in smaller groups the participants were asked to sort out “what´s in it for us?” and at larger meetings the results were put together to form the national SUMP-programme. More information can be found in Appendix. 2.2 National SUMP network The buildup of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations,

314 networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network TRANA, Prosperity Host of the Web address of Contact E-mail address Tel. number network the network name Ulf Pilerot Trafikverket.se Ulf Pilerot [email protected] Membership Cities/regions Other institutions Lund Luleå tekniska universitet Malmö Kungliga tekniska högskolan Gävle VTI Umeå Ecologize AB Norrköping Boverket Lerum Trafikverket Trondheim(Norway) Trivector Region Västra götalandsregionen Ramböll Region Halland SWECO Other organisation 2 WSP Region Skåne Lunds universitet Region Östergötland ÅF Region Skåne Region Halland Region Värmland Region Norrbotten

315

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

316

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 The benefits of traffic strategies

A traffic strategy prepared with broadly based municipal and regional support provides support for policy makers to reach well-founded decisions on individual traffic issues and other areas in which traffic is a prerequisite. The benefit of traffic strategies is that they create an improved basis for decision-making, as they contain analyses that reveal flaws and necessary measures from the perspective of the entire transport system, i.e. all forms of traffic and transport. This overview can link the municipality’s development with regional and national levels. For example, a plan for cycling at municipal level provides a good basis for cycling measures on regional and national routes. Coordination reduces the risk of individual measures that are not placed in context. Traffic strategies connect traffic issues and infrastructure planning with urban planning. This makes it easier to make decisions on measures to assist individual areas. They are also an effective tool when sustainability goals and ambitions in Agenda 2030 must be translated into concrete operational planning. Working with traffic strategies can contribute to a more transport-efficient society with reduced greenhouse gas emissions, noise pollution and air pollution. The State’s work to support traffic strategies is an important complement to planning

317 and building legislation, comprehensive planning and the Swedish Municipal Energy Planning Act (SFS 1977:439). Work on traffic strategies should take as their point of departure the findings of six Swedish public authorities in the Strategic Plan for Transitioning the Transport Sector (SOFT). In order to achieve a 70% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector by 2030, and climate neutrality by 2045, measures are required in the three areas of i) a transport- efficient society, ii) fossil-free, energy-efficient vehicles and vessels, and iii) renewable fuels. Traffic strategies are important above all because they create a transport-efficient society, although they also touch on the other two areas. In all likelihood, those municipalities that have prepared traffic strategies have carried out the analysis of the need for measures and reciprocal funding required to apply for state support to promote sustainable urban environments. Municipalities that have prepared a traffic strategy have batted around the strategic issues involved, developed a vision and goals and often implementation plans as a thorough and agreed basis for their applications for state funding. Municipalities with established traffic strategies also have a better overall grasp of the available opportunities for co-financing of public transport and cycling measures pursuant to the Swedish Ordinance regarding Support to Promote Sustainable Urban Environments (SFS 2015:579), in which packaged solutions are important for gaining the maximum benefit for the agreement, or via the Swedish Ordinance on Government Co-Financing for Certain Regional Public Transport Infrastructure (SFS 2009:237). When working with traffic strategies, it is necessary to seek measures according to the four- stage principle: Step 1, includes measures that influence transport needs (demand) and the choice of transport investments. Step 2, measures that provide more efficient use of existing roads and vehicles; Step 3, limited renovations; and Step 4, new investments and major renovations. It is important that work begins with Steps 1 and 2.

4 Financing Traffic strategy as a condition for state aid Preparing a traffic strategy, or revising an existing traffic strategy, can be a reciprocal requirement for obtaining state aid; for example, support to promote sustainable urban environments. The regulatory framework pursuant to the Swedish Ordinance regarding Support to Promote Sustainable Urban Environments should be reviewed and, where possible, adapted to support the increased use of traffic strategies at municipal level. Support to promote sustainable urban environments is primarily aimed at large municipalities which to a relatively large extent already have traffic strategies. In addition to support to promote sustainable urban environments, smaller municipalities also have recourse to funding pursuant to the Swedish Ordinance on Government Co-Financing for Certain Regional Public Transport Infrastructure, although this might require increased financial aid. Support for strategic traffic work at regional level Incentives are required to encourage a broader geographical and functional approach to traffic strategy. This can be achieved through a model for regional sustainable urban environment support. By setting a number of criteria, the fulfilment of which should show a higher overall benefit to participating in a regional traffic strategy, municipalities can be shown a picture of the joint profit to be made, instead of each municipality preparing their own traffic strategy. It is also worth

318 considering support to each municipality based on reciprocal requirements in the form of an active contribution to a joint regional traffic strategy.

Financial contribution from the state for the preparation and implementation of traffic strategies Financial contributions in various forms have previously been successful in encouraging more municipalities to prepare and adopt policy documents. As an example, when the first edition of the TRAST handbook was published, a small sum was paid to a number of municipalities who prepared the first traffic strategies in accordance with TRAST. Grants have also previously been paid to municipalities for conducting road safety programmes and similar traffic plans. Any such support could advantageously be linked to the employment of external competence support in conducting the work, even if it is important that the municipality owns and leads the work process. Financial contributions can also encourage municipalities to prioritise their traffic strategies.

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome

It widened the European view so the SUMPs could connect to what is used in Sweden, Traffic strategies (which is in many ways the same as SUMPs)

What worked well? What did not work well?

The national taskforce was doing very well and created a common perspective about what must be done. But there is always a lack of time/money.

Continuation of the SUMP Promotion Programme The Swedish Transport Administration will work with as many as possible of the proposed tasks in the National progamme. Sweden will also connect other projects, such as ParkPAD, to the ongoing work with SUMPs/Traffic strategies.

319

Appendix

Task Force meetings

Task Force Date City Country Number Main agenda Main agenda: fill 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of other Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) attendees / Keywords / Keywords / Keywords Launch 2017- Preparation of National Exchange of Stockholm Sweden 40 Meeting 12 SUMP Programme experience

Second 2018- Preparation of National Exchange of Stockholm Sweden 40 Meeting 05 SUMP Programme experience

Third Meeting 2019- Preparation of National Exchange of Stockholm Sweden 40 03 SUMP Programme experience

Additional 2019- Preparation of National Exchange of Stockholm Sweden meeting(s) 1 01 SUMP Programme experience

Additional 2017- Elaboration on quality Exchange of Skype Sweden 10 meeting(s) 2 12 assessment experience

Additional 2018- Elaboration on quality Exchange of Skype Sweden 10 meeting(s) 3 05 assessment experience

Additional 2019- Elaboration on quality Exchange of Skype Sweden 10 meeting(s) 4 03 assessment experience

320

Civitas active Exchange of 2018-09 yes Umeå Sweden 480 Forum participation experience TRANA(trafik strategier i Exchange of 2017-12 yes Skellefteå Sweden 40 organiser norra experience Sverige)

Webbinar Awareness Exchange of 2018-11 no Skype Sweden 40 organiser TRAST raising experience Awareness Exchange of Trafikdag 2019-02 no Luleå Sweden 50 organiser raising experience TRANA(trafik strategier i Exchange of Jun-18 yes Piteå Sweden 40 organiser norra experience Sverige)

321

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event

1 meeting 2018-10 no no Skype Sweden Regular meetings municipalties 2 meeting 2018-04 no no Skype Sweden Regular meetings municipalties 3 conference EU 4th SUMP Conference 2017-03 yes yes Dubrovnik Croacia

4 conference EU 5th SUMP Conference 2018-05 yes yes Nicosia Cyprus

322

1 secondary secondary primary

2 secondary secondary primary primary

3 secondary primary primary primary primary

4 secondary primary primary primary primary

323

1 20 active participation Awareness raising

2 20 active participation Awareness raising

3 300 active participation

4 300 active participation

324

Dissemination Target groups

holders

national level national

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stake sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project book TRAST- 1905-07 prim prim guiden "En primary primary primary ary ary checklista" Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content.

Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. https://www.trafi se kverket.se/for- Promote seco seco seco co dig-i- webs second second second second second SUMP/TRA 2019-01 ndar ndar ndar nd branschen/Plan ite ary ary ary ary ary ST y y y ar era-och- y utreda/samhalls planering/samsp

325

Target groups

holders

national level national

/ Name of media of / Name

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link el-mellan-trafik- och- bebyggelse/Plan era-for-hallbara- stader-och- attraktiva- regioner/Trafik- for-en-attraktiv- stad/endurance/ targe ted Email/webs prim Sep-18 primary primary e- ite ary mails e- news Email/webs prim prim 2018-12 primary primary primary lette ite ary ary r

326

Target groups

holders

national level national

/ Name of media of / Name

Category Kind Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link se www.trafikverket seco seco seco co .se webs Promote second second 2018-01 primary primary primary ndar ndar ndar nd ite prosperity ary ary y y y ar y

Regular blogging

News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website Promoting SUMPs ------on the webbsite for Swedish transport administration

327

SUMP Promotion Programme D6.4

Slovenia

Responsible Author(s): Zbyněk Sperat | CDV

Responsible Co-Authors: Aljaž Plevnik, Andraž Hudoklin | UIRS

Date: July 2019

Status: Final

328

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 330

2 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS ...... 330

2.1 TASK FORCE ...... 330

2.2 NATIONAL SUMP NETWORK ...... 332

2.3 CITIES AND THEIR ACTIVATION ...... 334

2.4 COACHINGS ...... 335

2.5 TRAINING(S) ...... 335

2.6 OTHER MEETINGS AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES ...... 336

3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 336

4 FINANCING ...... 337

5 SUMP PROMO PROGRAMME MAIN OUTCOME...... 338

APPENDIX ...... 339

329

2.1 Task Force The Task Force is the higher level ‘body’ that is committed to prepare the ground for the national SUMP programme, or to improve the existing programme. The Task Force should include and ideally be led by a governmental ‘higher level responsible’ for urban mobility. The Prosperity NFP’s have the task to start-up the Task Force (TF). There are 4 essentials to understand the Task Force (53) Governmental higher level body: the TF operates with the engagement of the national or higher level public authority that is responsible for sustainable (urban) mobility. The chair of the Task Force is ‘ideally’ the institute/person that has the decision making power. It might be the National Ministry of Transport or the Administration (sometimes also called ‘Department’) but when the referred competences are regionalised it might be another level institute. The task force however shouldn’t be defined institutionally/by law, in many countries this would take too much time. (54) Committed: means that the Task Force has tasks to do, and is not just an informal working group without clear objectives, targets and timing. Once again, this means that they ideally should have the power to decide amongst them. Being able to work efficiently, the group should be limited (see composition). (55) Prepare the ground for the national SUMPprogramme or to upgrade the existing one: is their main objective and task. This means however that – not whilst a strictly timing and purposeful agenda – in most countries it won’t be possible for the Task Force to obtain a fully elaborated and approved higher level framework programme within the duration of the Prosperity Project. The Road Map will report on the evolution and final status and will indicate steps how to continue beyond the Prosperity timing. (56) The national SUMP programme: the task is focussed on the development of a higher level policy framework for SUMP that might include institutional, legal and financial conditions and incentives to encourage and support cities in the development and implementation of high quality SUMPs. The national SUMP programme can become either a voluntary or regulatory (legal) framework.

330

Task Force structure

Name Organisation Function Email Polona Demšar Head of the Task Polona.Demsar- Mitrovič Ministry of Infrastructure Force [email protected] gregor.steklacic@g Gregor Steklačič Ministry of Infrastructure TF member ov.si tadej.zaucer@gov. Tadej Žaucer Ministry of Infrastructure TF member si marija.lesjak@gov. Marija Lesjak Ministry of Infrastructure TF member si natasa.ilnikar@gov Nataša Ilnikar Ministry of Infrastructure TF member .si TF member, Urban Planning Institute of the SUMP NFP, [email protected] Aljaž Plevnik Republic of Slovenia Prosperity partner TF member, Luka Urban Planning Institute of the SUMP NFP, [email protected] Mladenovič Republic of Slovenia Prosperity partner TF member, Urban Planning Institute of the SUMP NFP, [email protected] Mojca Balant Republic of Slovenia Prosperity partner TF member, Urban Planning Institute of the SUMP NFP, [email protected] Simon Koblar Republic of Slovenia Prosperity partner TF member, mitja.kolbl@ljutome Mitja Kolbl Prosperity city Ljutomer Prosperity partner r.si Regional development agency of peter.zajc@rra- Peter Zajc Koroška TF member koroska.si Tjaša Kump tjasa.kump.murn@r Murn Development centre of Novo mesto TF member c-nm.si University of Maribor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation [email protected] Marjan Lep Engineering and Architecture TF member vanda.mezgec@no Vanda Mezgec Municipality of Nova Gorica TF member va-gorica.si Ministry of the Environment and mojca.strbad@gov. Spatial Planning, Spatial Planning, si Mojca Strbad Construction and Housing Directorate TF member Coalition for Sustainable Transport urban.jeriha@ipop. Urban Jeriha Policy (NGO) TF member si David VOZIM, Institute for Innovative Safe [email protected] Razboršek Driving Education TF member mateja.kukovec@z Mateja Kukovec ZUM urbanism, planning and design TF member um-mb.si

Task Force meetings

331

Five Task Force meetings were held in Slovenia during the project. The main points of the meetings were a preparation of National SUMP Programme and elaboration of quality assessment.

We found a good structure of participants, made it flexible regarding the planned topics, and also found the way how to make it attractive to participants to come (2-days meetings at a remote, though attractive location with some informal activities).

We’ll continue with its work after the project with even more intensive work and we managed to secure resources for it in a different project (programme LIFE). This shows the importance and success of the NTF in Slovenia. 2.2 National SUMP network The build-up of enduring national networks on SUMPs was the central objective of previous ENDURANCE project. By term ‘National SUMP Network’ is meant a national network that actively supports its members in preparing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. A National SUMP Network is hosted by one or several organisations, associations, networks etc. who would ensure a minimum level of Network activities during and beyond the ENDURANCE project. These networks were expected to:  foster a national policy and national support for SUMP  organise and develop information, training and training materials in the local language  facilitate national knowledge exchange between cities,  be the national contact point and thus channel and institutionalise the knowledge exchange on an international level  be able to provide support to cities and agglomerations even in adverse circumstances (e.g. economic slump, hostile political environment). The networks are there to encourage and support cities to engage in sustainable urban mobility planning and implementation, so close communication with cities and their activation was needed.

332

National SUMP network – basic facts Name of the network Slovenska platforma za trajnostno mobilnost (SPTM) - Slovenian Platform for Sustainable Mobility (SPSM) Host of the network Web address Contact E-mail address Tel. of the network name number UIRS (the network was transferred to the www.trajnostna Mojca +386 1 420 [email protected] Ministry of infrastructure mobilnost.si Balant 13 36 in Spring 2019) Ministry of infrastructure Nataša +386 1 478 (took it over in Spring www.sptm.si [email protected] Ilnikar 82 28 2019) Membership Cities/regions Other institutions Municipalities (63; 30%) National institutions (17; 8%) Experts in transport and other fields (69; 33%) Regional agencies (18; 9%) NGOs (9; 4%) PT operators (11; 5%) Media (14; 7%) Other (9; 4%)

333

with no SUMP SUMP (0%) (90%) no with SUMP SUMP

Target group: authorities with a high score on the SUMP continuum but not interested in networking. Task: convince them to participate in PROSPERITY activities.

Contact strategy: phone calls, personal visits only if needed

3 not interested in not interested in SUMP network/SUMP improvement SUMP network/SUMP improvement

The city activation strategy was in particular designed for cities to join national existing or newly established SUMPs networks. As these networks have been already established in most of Prosperity countries within Endurance project, city activation is not needed any more in countries where national SUMP networks work well. For the rest of countries it is recommended to use the principles of it. It is relevant especially in Croatia and Cyprus which were not Endurance partners. As of July 2019, there are 63 Slovenian cities listed on the country website. Cities active in SUMP can be found on ENDURANCE project website: http://www.epomm.eu/endurance

334

2.4 Coachings Three coachings were organised during the project in project city on various topics of SUMP.

Event Date Topic Attendance Cities People Coaching 1 6/3/2018 SUMP implementation 1 4 Coaching 2 19/3/2018 land acquisition for 2 8 and infrastructure projects (e.g. 20/3/2018 cycling paths), public involvement and consultation techniques, funding sources for implementation of measures and conditions for acquisition of funds in relation to city size Coaching 3 12/03/2019 Integration of spatial and 3 18 transport planning

The main impact of coachings was new knowledge and information brought to the already developed planning practice in the municipality. 2.5 Training(s) One regular five-day training was organised in Croatian city of Rovinj together with Croatian cities. Event Date Topic(s) Attendance Cities People Regular 2019-03 Adopting the SUMP approach for small 13 15 Training – 19-23 and mid sizes cities (Slovenian (Slovenian How does SUMP mesh with statutory only) only) land use plans

Communication and stakeholder involvement of the new SUMP - measures Use of public space

The main impact of the first training was an increase of capacities in specific SUMP topics in Slovenian cities.

335

Detail overview of all types of activities and specific actions realised during the project can be found in Appendix of this report.

3 Legislative framework During the recent years of intense SUM planning development in Slovenia, it has been recognised that the development and stability of this planning approach will have to be placed in a legal framework and that some legal basis for SUM planning will need to be developed. The experience of countries that are more advanced in SUM planning also indicates that legislation is an important step in the development and stability of SUM planning and could contribute to less dependence of SUM planning in Slovenia on EU financing and initiatives. Legislation can also strengthen cross-sectoral integration in SUM planning. Purpose of the Act The Act on Sustainable Mobility (SM) will be the basis for further SUM planning development. It will delineate the organisational framework, responsibilities, minimal SUM planning standards on all levels and set monitoring and evaluation and quality assessment schemes. It will also serve as the basis for integrating SUM planning with other sectors, especially the spatial and environmental and will define the relationship between SUM planning and strategic spatial planning in municipalities and regions and its role in spatial planning, environmental protection and other sectors. The Act will also be the basis for a stabile financing of SUM planning from national resources and for decreasing this area’s dependence on EU initiatives. The relationship to existing

336 national funds, such as the Climate Fund or the Eco Fund will be defined. Following the example of other countries, access to these funds and other state sources of financing will be conditioned with a minimal scope of SUM planning in the municipality or region. At the same time, the act is intended to be encouraging rather than limiting, as its purpose is to boost the development of SUM planning in as many municipalities and regions as possible. Preparation of the Act The MoI with expert support of the NTF for SUMP will lead the preparation process for the Act. Collaboration with other sectors, especially the spatial, environmental and financial will also be part of the process.

4 Financing Experience from more developed countries shows that a successful National SUMP Programme requires stable and clearly defined financial and other support schemes. Financial resources (EU and national) are an important element of implementing SUM planning on all levels. European resources have emerged as the main motivation for kick-starting SUM planning in many countries; the further comprehensive system of support for municipalities and regions can be achieved by countries deploying their own resources. The financial mechanisms are often used as a lever to raise the quality of SUMP and its implementation, even though the minimal quality standards for SUMP as a prerequisite for acquiring resources to implement it, are still a rare practice. Financial Incentives The current financial incentives for SUM planning in Slovenia are mostly based on cohesion funding for sustainable mobility. The Cohesion Fund (CF) is financing the preparation of SUMPs and implementation of some measures for sustainable mobility in cities (pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, public transport stops, and P+R systems). The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) is financing implementation of sustainable mobility actions in 11 city municipalities as part of the Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) and the construction of regional cycling routes as part of the Regional Development Agreement. A smaller portion of the funding is also guaranteed from the national Climate and Eco Funds, which could potentially become a permanent source of financing SUM planning activities in Slovenia. Other Forms of Incentives A number of incentives and mechanisms will be implemented that will stimulate the interest in SUM planning in municipalities, regions and responsible bodies at the national level. Smaller municipalities with limited financial and staff resources for SUM planning will be encouraged to network and collaborate with other municipalities for SUMP development. The municipalities will also be invited to upgrade their SUMPs to inter-municipal or regional SUMPs. Larger towns will take the lead role in this process in order to manage traffic flows in their gravitational hinterland. When collaborating with other ministries, SUMPs will be recommended as a tool for managing challenges indirectly related to mobility (e.g. inadequate air quality).

337

5 SUMP Promo Programme main outcome For Slovenia the main outcome of the project is creation of a National Task Force, which improved collaboration of relevant stakeholders in the field of SUMP and strengthen the coordination role of the Ministry of Infrastructure in this field. Additionally, the upgrade of the National SUMP programme raised ambitions in this field and helped in successful search for resources for its implementation. Due to the training and national SUMP promo events (e.g. National SUMP conferences) the PROSPERITY project contributed to increased knowledge of SUMPs among Slovenian cities which were in different stages of SUMP preparation, elaboration or implementation. The main impact of coachings was new knowledge and information brought to the already developed planning practice in the municipality. Strengthening the role of the key Ministry of Infrastructure in coordinating development of SUMPs in the country. Also Ministry of Environment is now more involved and familiar with the concept, partly as a result of PROSPERITY. After the last intervention by the Ministry of Infrastructure when they have confinanced more than 60 SUMPs with structural funds, awareness is much higher. What worked well? NTF was most important contribution from the project. With the NTF we’ve broaden the group of people dealing with the national programme, opened the discussion and had regular interchange based on the frequent meetings. What did not work well? The lack of capacities of main players in the NTF (Ministry of Infrastructure, UIRS and others) to respond to the increased demand for the support and development of SUMPs in the country. Continuation of the SUMP programme We’ll continue with NTF´s work after the project with even more intensive work and we managed to secure resources for it in a different project. This shows the importance and success of the NTF in Slovenia.

338

Appendix Task Force meetings Task Force Date City Country Number Main Main agenda: fill other 1st 2nd 3rd Meetings of agenda Objective(s) Objective( Objectiv attendees / Keywords s) / e(s) / Keywords Keyword s Launch 2016- First steps, Prosperity Capacity Strategic Šmartno Slovenia 6 Other Meeting 12 interview building planning Prosperity questionnaire; 2017- Strategic Capacity First Meeting Celje Slovenia 14 Other status of activities on national 03 planning building level Status of activities, National Exchange Second 2017- Capacity Izola Slovenia 14 Other SUMP Guidelines update, of Meeting 11 building SUMP QA, Regional SUMPs experience Elaboration 2018- Logarska Strategic Capacity Third Meeting Slovenia 13 on quality 07 dolina planning building assessment Check-up and update of the Preparation draft document (prepared by Exchange Fourth 2018- of National UIRS and the Ministry Strategic of Maribor Slovenia 18 Meeting 12 SUMP ALSO: workshop on planning experienc Programme integration of transport and e spatial planning, SUMP QA Elaboration 2019- Gozd Strategic Capacity Fifth meeting Slovenia 17 on action 05 Martuljek planning building plan level

339

National SUMP promo events Name of the Date Multiple City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event -day er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / event attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) 1st National SUMP http://www. Conference trajnostnam »Clean and obilnost.si/e Strategic Capacity Exchange of intelligent 2017-02 no Ljubljana Slovenia 122 n- co-organiser planning building experience mobility for gb/aktivnosti everyone« with /dogodki/do national EMW godki7.aspx 2017 kick-off http://teden EMW 2017 Slovenj mobilnosti.si Exchange of Capacity Strategic 2017-10 no Slovenia 36 co-organiser final event Gradec /2017/gradiv experience building planning a-za-obcine/ 2nd National SUMP http://www. Conference trajnostnam »Active obilnost.si/e Strategic Capacity Exchange of mobility makes 2018-02 no Ljubljana Slovenia 80 n- co-organiser planning building experience you happy« gb/aktivnosti with national /dogodki/do EMW 2018 godki9.aspx kick-off

340

Name of the Date Multiple City Country Numb Link to NFP´s 1st 2nd 3rd event -day er of event- interaction / Objective(s) Objective(s) Objective(s) / event attend website Other parties / Keywords / Keywords Keywords ees involved (choose (choose (choose one) one) one) Brestanic EMW 2018 Exchange of Capacity Strategic 2018-10 no a and Slovenia 30 co-organiser final event experience building planning Krško http://sptm.s 3rd National i/2019/02/14 SUMP /3- Conference Strategic Capacity Exchange of 2019-02 no Ljubljana Slovenia 127 nacionalna- co-organiser with national planning building experience konferenca- EMW 2019 kick-off o-trajnostni- mobilnosti/ Exchange Capacity Study visit 2017-06 no Ljutomer Slovenia 28 co-organiser of building experience

341

Third-party events Table 1/3 - Basic information Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event 1 4th Assembly of CIVINET network meeting 2017-02 no yes Maribor Slovenia Slovenia-Croatia-SE Europe training/seminar/work Planning and design for pedestrians and 2 2017-04 no no Ljubljana Slovenia shop cyclists in urban areas training/seminar/work 3 Round table on SUM-planning 2017-04 no no Zagreb Croatia shop Yearly Civinet Forum for SI-CRO-SE conference 4 2017-06 no yes Rijeka Croatia Europe network Presentation of projects on sustainable training/seminar/work 5 mobility and round table – monitoring and 2017-09 no no Ljubljana Slovenia shop impact assessment Conference “Towards a humane city” - conference 6 Prosperity workshop as part of the 2017-10 yes yes Novi Sad Serbia programme

excursion 7 Experience Exchange Workshop 2017-11 yes yes Ljubljana Slovenia

EU expert group for urban mobility meeting 8 2018-04 no yes Brussels Belgium meeting Urban Mobility Training and Planning training/seminar/work 9 Workshop, Deutsche Gesellschaft für 2018-05 yes yes Tirana Albania shop Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ),

342

Type of the event No. Name of the event Date (YYYY- Multiple- International City Country MM) day event event Open Regional Fund for South East Europe, Energy Efficiency (ORF-EE) Civitas Forum 2018 - Prosperity workshop conference 10 as part of the programme (implemented by 2018-09 yes yes Umea Sweden Patrick Auwerx) 79th session of the UNECE Committee on Switzerla meeting 11 2018-10 yes yes Geneva Housing and Land Management nd conference 12 European transport conference 2018 2018-10 yes yes Dublin Ireland

National conference on transport and conference 13 2018-10 yes no Portorož Slovenia infrastructure French symposium on Air Quality by other 14 ADEME (Presentation of Ljutomer's 2018-10 yes no Paris France SUMP as a chosen best practise) Interview with Mitja Kolbl from Ljutomer for other 15 2018-06 no no N/A N/A URBACT training/seminar/work Workshop on integration of traffic planing 16 2019-03 no no Ljutomer Slovenia shop and spatial planning

343

2 N/A primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A primary

3 primary primary primary primary secondary N/A primary N/A N/A

seconda secondar 4 primary primary primary secondary primary secondary secondary ry y

5 secondary primary primary secondary N/A secondary N/A N/A N/A

6 primary primary primary secondary primary secondary N/A N/A primary

7 primary primary primary secondary primary N/A N/A N/A N/A

8 N/A primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

9 N/A primary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A primary

seconda secondar 10 primary primary primary secondary primary secondary secondary ry y

344

12 secondary primary secondary secondary secondary secondary N/A N/A primary

13 N/A primary secondary N/A N/A secondary N/A N/A primary

seconda 14 secondary primary N/A secondary secondary primary N/A primary ry seconda 15 primary primary primary secondary N/A N/A N/A primary ry

16 primary primary secondary N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

345

http://odraz.hr/en/news/odraz- news/4th-assembly-of-the-civinet- Exchange of 1 65 network-and-roundtable-on- active participation Capacity building Awareness raising experience planning-of-sustainable-urban-

mobility-held-in-maribor Exchange of 2 120 active participation Capacity building Awareness raising experience https://civinet-slohr.eu/okrugli- stol-o-planiranju-odrzive- 3 60 active participation Strategic planning Capacity building Awareness raising mobilnosti-u-gradovima-zagreb-13-

travnja-2017/ https://civinet-slohr.eu/2-civinet- Exchange of 4 70 active participation Capacity building Awareness raising forum-rijeka-9-lipnja-2017/ experience Exchange of 5 20 active participation Awareness raising Strategic planning experience

6 40 http://humanecityns.org/ active participation Strategic planning Capacity building Awareness raising

Exchange of 7 10 active participation Capacity building experience Exchange of 8 10 active participation experience

346

No. Number of Link to event-website Your interaction 1st Objective(s) / 2nd Objective(s) / 3rd Objective(s) / attendees Keywords (choose Keywords (choose Keywords (choose one) one) one)

9 30 active participation Capacity building Awareness raising

Exchange of 10 400 http://civitas.eu/hr/node/42452 active participation Strategic planning Capacity building experience Exchange of 11 150 active participation Strategic planning Awareness raising experience https://aetransport.org/en- Exchange of 12 500 active participation Strategic planning Capacity building gb/etc/this-year-at-etc experience

13 200 http://www.drc.si/kongres/ active participation Strategic planning Awareness raising Capacity building

http://www.ademe.fr/actualites/m Exchange of 14 100 anifestations/4e-assises- Strategic planning Capacity building experience nationales-qualite-lair http://urbact.eu/mitja-kolbl- %C2%BB%C5%BEelimo-si-da-bi-bil- Exchange of 15 2 active participation Capacity building ljutomer-%C4%8Dez-20-let-mesto- experience

umirjenega-prometa%C2%AB Exchange of 16 15 active participation Capacity building Awareness raising experience

347

Dissemination Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link Printed materials - publications released within CIVITAS PROSPERITY project

Media - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Proceedings of Prosp the National oth 2018 primar secon secon prim erity nation conference on N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A er -10 y dary dary ary promo al transport and tion infrastructure Digital promotion (2.0 media) - original CIVITAS PROSPERITY content. Prospe we Website of the seco seco http://www.traj 2018 prim rity nation bsit national SUMP primary primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A ndar nostnamobilnos -10 ary promo al e platform y y t.si/ tion

348

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link targ Prospe ete seco seco 2018 prim rity nation d e- Email primary primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A ndar -10 ary promo al mai y y ls tion targ Prospe ete seco seco 2018 prim rity nation d e- Email primary primary primary ndar N/A N/A N/A ndar -10 ary promo al mai y y ls tion Municipality of http://www.obc Ljutomer's sub- Prospe we seco inaljutomer.si/f website dedicated 2017 second prim prim second rity bsit primary N/A N/A primary ndar local otogalerija/proj to information -06 ary ary ary ary promo e y ekt- about Prosperity tion prosperity/6073 activities

Regular blogging

349

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link https://olgakarba Electric vehicles seco seco SUMP .si/2017/05/22/p 2017 prim prim second olnilnica-za- charging station primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local -05 ary ary ary elektricna- also in Ljutomer y y ation vozila-tudi-v- ljutomeru/ https://olgakarba Site visit on .si/2017/06/08/p Prospe achievements and seco seco redstavljeni- 2017 prim prim second rity nation dosezki-in- plans in the field of primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar -06 ary ary ary promo al nacrti-s- sustainable y y tion podrocja- mobility trajnostne- mobilnosti/ Reconstruction of https://olgakarba seco seco SUMP .si/2017/06/30/s roads in town 2017 prim prim second primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local anacija-cest-na- Železne Dveri and -06 ary ary ary y y ation obmocju-ks- its surroundings zelezne-dveri/

350

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link https://olgakarba Opening of the seco seco SUMP .si/2017/07/28/o reconstructed part 2017 prim prim second dprtje- primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local of the road in -07 ary ary ary obnovljenega- y y ation settlement Desnjak dela-ceste-v- naselju-desnjak/ Renovation of https://olgakarba seco seco SUMP .si/2017/07/30/o public roads, 2017 prim prim second primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local bnovljene-javne- streets and paths in -07 ary ary ary y y ation poti-v-strocji- Stročja village vas/ https://olgakarba seco seco SUMP .si/2017/12/22/o New sidewalk and 2017 prim prim second primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local dprtje-plocnika- bridge in Cezanjevci -12 ary ary ary y y ation in-brvi-v- cezanjevcih/ seco seco SUMP Ljutomer city will 2018 prim prim second https://olgakarba primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local finally receive the -02 ary ary ary .si/2018/02/21/m y y ation esto-ljutomer-

351

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link missing cycling bo-dobilo- connection manjkajoco- kolesarsko- stezo/ https://olgakarba Reconstruction of seco seco SUMP .si/2018/04/24/v- 2018 prim prim second sidewalks in primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local mestu-ljutomer- -04 ary ary ary Ljutomer city y y ation se-sanirajo- plocniki/ https://olgakarba New bicycle shelter .si/2018/04/24/n seco seco SUMP ova-kolesarnica- and three e-bikes 2018 prim prim second primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local in-elektricna- for municipal -04 ary ary ary y y ation kolesa-za- administration zaposlene-v- obcinski-upravi/ Construction of seco seco SUMP 2018 prim prim second https://olgakarba missing cycling primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local -05 ary ary ary .si/2018/05/30/p connections in the y y ation odpisana-

352

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link centre of Ljutomer pogodba-za- – acquisition of ureditev- kolesarskih- funds and contract povezav-v- signing ljutomeru/ Construction of https://olgakarba missing cycling .si/2018/07/25/u seco seco SUMP reditev- connections in the 2018 prim prim second primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local manjkajocih- centre of Ljutomer -07 ary ary ary y y ation kolesarskih- – start of povezav-v- implementation ljutomeru/ https://olgakarba Opening of a .si/2018/09/03/ot renovated public seco seco SUMP voritev- 2018 prim prim second obnovljene- road, sidewalk and primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local -09 ary ary ary javne-poti- parking lot in y y ation plocnika-in- Stročja village (near parkirisca-v- strocji-vasi/

353

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link the Firebrigade and Primary School) https://olgakarba Signposting of the .si/2018/10/17/p cycling route to seco seco SUMP ostavitev- Jeruzalem and 2018 prim prim second kazipotov-in- primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local construction of a -10 ary ary ary ureditev- y y ation rest station with pocivalisca-za- kolesarje-na- bike-repair facility jeruzalemu/ https://olgakarba Promotion of a seco seco SUMP .si/2018/10/26/p brochure 2018 prim prim second redstavitev- primary N/A N/A ndar primary ndar inform local »Ljutomer, our -10 ary ary ary kataloga- y y ation city« ljutomer-nase- mesto/ News and case studies - News and case studies fed into the Mobility Plans Platform website ELTIS case study on http://www.eltis.

Ljutomer's SUMP org/discover/cas

354

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link e- studies/slovenia s-first-sump- small-scale- ljutomer Consultancy and experts: Developing a network of SUMP consultants in Slovenia Information, education and knowledge exchange: National platform for supporting SUMP activities in Slovenia Financing SUMP:

Financial support for

355

Target groups

/ Name of media of / Name

Politicians Politicians and decision makers on level national local and mobility professionals Urban SUMP contracts EMW caretakers and municipalities coordinators sector public in the Stakeholders within SUMP initiatives platforms networks and media specialised and Mainstream public General stakeholders sectors Private professionals sector Other

Category Kin Title date Launch Release/ promotion of Objectives Coverage applies) (if Frequency exists) (if Link the development and implementation of SUMPs in Slovenia

356

357