The Distribution of the Non-Native Plant Salsola Soda in San Francisco Bay: Summary of a Thesis by Judi Tamasi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Distribution of the Non-Native Plant Salsola Soda in San Francisco Bay: Summary of a Thesis by Judi Tamasi CalEPPC A quarterly publication News of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council Volume 6 Number 3 Summer 1998 IN THIS ISSUE Presidents Message by Mike Pitcairn .................... p. 3 The Distribution of Salsola soda in San Francisco Bay by Judi Tamasit ................... p. 4 Starr Ranch Sanctuary Artichoke Conference by Mike Kelly ...................... p. 6 Extension Toxicology Network (ExToxNet) as a Source of Pesticide Toxicology Information by Joe DiTomaso ................ p. 8 Locations and degree of presence of Salsola soda throughout San Francisco Bay. Map designed by A. N. Cohen, 1989. CalEPPC News Who We Are 1998 CalEPPC Officers and CalEPPC NEWS is published quarterly Board Members by the California Exotic Pest Plant Officers Council, a non-profit organization. The President Mike Pitcairn email: <[email protected]> objects of the organization are to: Vice-president Greg Archbald email: <[email protected]> Secretary John Randall email: <[email protected]> j provide a focus for issues and Treasurer Sally Davis email: <[email protected]> concerns regarding exotic pest Past-president Ann Howald email: <[email protected]> plants in California; At-large Board Members j facilitate communication and the Joe Balciunas* email: <[email protected]> exchange of information regarding Cameron Barrows* email: <[email protected]> all aspects of exotic pest plant Carl Bell* email: <[email protected]> Joe DiTomaso* email: <[email protected]> control and management; Steve Harris* email: <[email protected]> Jo Kitz email: <[email protected]> j provide a forum where all interested Anne Knox email: <[email protected]> parties may participate in meetings Brenda Ouwerkerk email: <[email protected]> and share in the benefits from the Ellie Wagner email: <[email protected]> information generated by this Peter Warner email: <[email protected]> * Board Members whose terms expire December 31, 1998 council; Working Group Chairpersons j promote public understanding regarding exotic pest plants and Arundo Nelroy Jackson 909.279.7787 [email protected] their control; Artichoke thistle Mike Kelly 619.566.6489 [email protected] Brooms Karen Haubensak Cape ivy Greg Archbald 415.561.3034, x3425 [email protected] j serve as an advisory council regard- Cortaderial Joe DiTomaso 530.754.8715 [email protected] ing funding, research, management Euphorbia terracinaJo Kitz 818.346.9675 [email protected] and control of exotic pest plants; Fennel Jennifer Erskin 530.753.8193 [email protected] Lepidium Joel Trumbo 916.358.2952 j facilitate action campaigns to Saltcedar Bill Neill 281.287.5246 Spartina Steve Jones monitor and control exotic pest Veldtrass Dave Chipping 805.528.0362 [email protected] plants in California; and Volunteers Pete Halloran Yellow starthistle Mike Pitcairn 916.262.2049 [email protected] j review incipient and potential pest plant management problems and Editor Sally Davis 32912 Calle del Tesoro, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 ph: 949.487.5427 email: [email protected] activities and provide relevant information to interested parties. CalEPPCs web site: http://www.caleppc.org Submission Dates for CalEPPC News If you would like to submit a news item, an article, a meeting announcement, or job opportunity for publication in the CalEPPC News, they must be received by the deadlines listed below. Editor reserves the right to edit all submissions. Send your text/disk/email to editors address above. Submission Dates: Spring April 15 Fall October 15 Summer July 15 Winter January 15 Please Note: The articles contained herein were contributed to the CalEPPC newsletter. The California Exotic Pest Plant Council is a These articles represent the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily California 501(c)3 non-profit, public benefit reflect the views of CalEPPC. Although herbicide recommendations may corporation organized to provide a focus for issues and concerns regarding exotic pest plants in have been reviewed in contributed articles, CalEPPC does not guarantee California, and is recognized under federal and their accuracy with regard to efficacy, safety, or legality. state tax laws a qualified donee for tax deducible charitable contributions. Page 2 Summer 1998 CalEPPC News Presidents Message by Mike Pitcairn everal interesting discussions activities; and we put on an annual tion of native plant community. No Shave occurred during the last few symposium where experts in plant progress is made if one plant is CalEPPC board meetings concern- biology and control methods present removed and another invasive exotic ing the topics to be presented at the most current information on takes its place. Thus, exotic weed CalEPPCs Symposium 98 which these topics. Scientific studies and control must be incorporated in a will be held in Ontario, October 2-4, reports on the damage caused by weed management strategy that 1998. The discussions centered encourages the return of native around what information would best The goals of species and prevents the reinvasion serve our membership. I will try to CalEPPC have been of exotics. summarize some of our conclusions, 2) Safety is critical for all control but first some background. primarily educational methods. Some control methods risk Some (not all) exotic plants are and twofold: to get damage to other plant species, aggressive invaders that escape others risk damage to the applica- areas in which they were originally the word out and to tors. Chain saws should be used with intended and invade native plant provide informa- appropriate protective gear and communities. Upon invasion, these proper training. Herbicides are exotic plants displace native flora tion... should be applied with appropriate and disrupt ecosystem function. equipment and protective clothing, They can change nutrient cycling some exotic plants are being pub- etc. Organization and identification and moisture regimes. They can lished annually and this information of duties are critical to reduce risk to change the frequency of fire or even is passed on to you as it becomes volunteers in field crews. introduce fire into areas it has not available. Control methodology 3) The control methods used historically existed (e.g. the occur- encompasses several different must be science-based and shown to rence of exotic annuals in the technologies: releasing living organ- be effective. There are so many Mojave Desert). The threat of these isms with biological control; using weeds and so little time. Lets make exotic species is so great that they controlled burns; coordinating crews the most of our efforts. This is not need to be removed, eradicated, or who remove plants with chain saws to say that experimenting with new at least controlled lest we lose the and hand tools; and applying chemi- methods or unique combinations of diversity of our native plant commu- cal herbicides. Information on traditional methods should not be nities and the integrity of native control methodology is limited, but utilized, for they should. We do ask, ecosystems. growing. however, that the methods used and When CalEPPC was organized Control methodology is a very results achieved be documented so in the early 1990s, knowledge of large and diverse topic and the that effectiveness can be evaluated. the threat and damage caused by CalEPPC board has discussed at 4) While not all control methods some exotic plant species was length what information would best are appropriate for all weeds and all confined to a few experts, and serve our members. Several views situations, the choice of control methods for controlling these plants on many diverse aspects of plant method cannot be made before the was sorely lacking. Since its incep- control have been expressed in these habitat is examined and a control tion, the goals of CalEPPC have discussions. Still, a consensus ap- strategy is developed (see 1 above). been primarily educational and pears to occur on several points CalEPPC will provide as much twofold: to get the word out about which I will do my best to summa- information as possible for all the threat of some exotic plants to rize: control methods. The final decision native plant communities, and to 1) Control of an exotic pest rests upon those responsible for the provide information on how to plant must be considered in the project. eradicate or control them. For this, larger context of the habitat and The theme for Symposium 98 we have produced a plant list identi- ecosystem where the control activity is Working Smarter, Working fying the most invasive exotics; we will take place. The goal of control- Together. This should be a very have a newsletter providing informa- ling exotic plants is not just removal interesting and enlightening sympo- tion on plant biology and control of the target weed but also restora- sium. I hope to see all of you there. j Summer 1998 Page 3 CalEPPC News The Distribution of the Non-Native Plant Salsola soda in San Francisco Bay: Summary of a Thesis by Judi Tamasi determined the distribution of a County Recreation Area, and at found at the crossing of Pinole Creek, I non-native plant, Salsola soda, the south end of San Francisco the railroad tracks, and the adjacent throughout marshes in San Fran- Bay at the Palo Alto Yacht Harbor. wetland. At this location, S. soda was cisco Bay for my senior Environmen- I did not find it at several locations the dominant plant in large densities tal Sciences honors thesis at the I visited in the less salty waters of covering a large area along a dry University of California at Berkeley. Suisun Bay, although two people levee. Here, S. soda may have altered Although some sightings of the plant did report finding it there (Preston, the vegetative structure of the ecosys- in the Bay had been officially re- 1995, pers. comm.; Witham, tem, and perhaps influenced this ported before my project, my paper 1995, pers. comm.). ecosystem in other unknown ways.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD) Volume: 5 | Issue: 12 | December 2020 - Peer Reviewed Journal
    SJIF Impact Factor: 7.001| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online) EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD) Volume: 5 | Issue: 12 | December 2020 - Peer Reviewed Journal CHEMICAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE ICLUSION OF AMARANTHACEAE AND CHENOPODIACEAE INTO ONE FAMILY AMARANTHACEAE JUSS. (s.l.) Fatima Mubark1 1PhD Research Scholar, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants research Institute, National Council for Research, Khartom, Sudan Ikram Madani Ahmed2 2Associate Professor, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Khartoum, Sudan Corresponding author: Ikram Madani, Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra6001 ABSTRACT In this study, separation of chemical compounds using Thin layer chromatography technique revealed close relationship between the studied members of the newly constructed family Amaranthaceae Juss. (s.l.). 68% of the calculated affinities between the studied species are above 50% which is an indication for close relationships. 90% is the chemical affinities reported between Chenopodium murale and three species of the genus Amaranthus despite of their great morphological diversity. Among the selected members of the chenopodiaceae, Chenopodium murale and Suaeda monoica are the most closely related species to all of the studied Amaranthaceae . 60%-88% and 54%-88% chemical affinities were reported for the two species with the Amaranthaceae members respectively. GC-Mass analysis of methanolic extracts of the studied species identified 20 compounds common between different species. 9,12- Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-,2-hydroxy-1 and 7-Hexadecenal,(Z)- are the major components common between Amaranthus graecizans, Digera muricata Aerva javanica Gomphrena celosioides of the historical family Amaranthaceae and Suaeda monoica Salsola vermiculata Chenopodium murale Cornulaca monocantha of the historical family Chenopodiaceae, Most of the identified compounds are of pharmaceutical importance such as antioxidants, anti-inflammatory , and Anti-cancerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Coast SNPL 2012 Breeding Survey with WA OR CA
    2012 Summer Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2005-2011 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. Total Adults 2012 Adult Breakdown REGION SITE OWNER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 male fem. sex? Grays Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Conner Creek State Parks 00000 00 00 0 Damon Point/Oyhut S. Parks, D. Nat R. F & W 500000 00 00 0 County Total 500000 00 00 0 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 23 25 22 12 16 18 22 11 65 0 Graveyard Shoalwater Indian Tribe 10 0 0 2 11 0 Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 9 42282926201215 10 4 1 South Long Beach Private 00000 County Total 32 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Washington Total 37 67 50 42 42 38 34 28 17 10 1 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 0 0 0 0 1 00 1 Necanicum Spit OPRD 0000 0 01 00 1 County Total 000000 02 00 2 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Bayocean Spit ACOE 00000 00 00 0 Netarts Spit OPRD 000000 00 00 0 Sand Lake Spit (S) USFS 000000 00 00 0 Nestucca Spit OPRD 0000 0 0 00 0 County Total 000000 00 00 0 Lane Baker Beach/Sutton Creek USFS 0200 1 00 00 0 Sutton Cr./Siuslaw River N Jetty USFS 0 0 0 0 00 0 Siuslaw River S Jetty to Siltcoos USFS 4 40 0 Siltcoos Spits N & S USFS 11 18 16 11 17 18 18 22 11 10 1 County Total 11 20 16 11 17 19 18 26 15 10 1 Douglas Siltcoos-Tahkenitch (Dunes Overlook) USFS 9 2 19 7 6 19 39 42 22 20 0 Tahkenitch Spit N & S USFS 515035132716 11 0 Umpqua River S Jetty to Tenmile Spit USFS 0 11 10 12 57 0 County Total 14 3 24 7 20 24 62 81 43 38 0 Coos Tenmile Spits USFS 13 15 27 24 24 36 13 16 88 0 Coos Bay N Spit BLM, ACOE 27 27 26 30 41 38 39 52 35 17 0 Whiskey Run to Coquille River OPRD 0000 00 00 0 Bandon State Park to New River OPRD, Private, BLM 22 12 15 8 14 40 16 14 95 0 County Total 62 54 68 62 79 114 68 82 52 30 0 Curry New River to Floras Lake BLM, Private, County 13 14 17 25 24 1 20 15 96 0 Blacklock Point to Sixes River (C.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • The Canary Islands
    The Canary Islands Naturetrek Tour Report 6 - 13 March 2009 Indian Red Admiral – Vanessa indica vulcania Canary Islands Cranesbill – Geranium canariense Fuerteventura Sea Daisy – Nauplius sericeus Aeonium urbicum - Tenerife Euphorbia handiensis - Fuerteventura Report compiled by Tony Clarke with images by kind courtesy of Ken Bailey Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report The Canary Islands Tour Leader: Tony Clarke (tour leader and naturalist) Tour Participants: Phil Haywood Hazel Haywood Peter Barrett Charles Wade Ken Bailey Day 1 Friday 6th March The arrival time of the group meant that we had enough time to do some birding in the afternoon and so we drove up from the airport, through Vilaflor to the Zona Recreativa de Las Lajas. This is probably the most well known location on Tenerife as it is where most people see their first Blue Chaffinches and we were not to be disappointed. Also at this location we saw the only Great Spotted Woodpecker of the tour plus a few Canaries, a Tenerife Kinglet and a few African Blue Tits. After departing from Las Lajas we continued climbing and entered the Las Cañadas National Park which is a spectacular drive through volcanic scenery. On the drive we encountered quite a few endemic plants including Pinus canariensis and Spartocytisus supranubius that were common and easily recognized and Echium wildpretii, Pterocephalus lasiospermus, Descurainia bourgaeana and Argyranthemum teneriffae which were rather unimpressive as they were not yet flowering but we were compensated by the fabulous views across the ancient caldera.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Species Surveys in the Acquisition Areas on the Tejon Ranch, California
    MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR THE TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY Prepared by: Brian L. Cypher, Christine L. Van Horn Job, Erin N. Tennant, and Scott E. Phillips California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program One University Circle Turlock, CA 95382 August 16, 2010 esrp_2010_TejonRanchsurvey.doc MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Study Areas ......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 4 Target Special Status Species .................................................................................................................... 4 Camera Station Surveys ............................................................................................................................. 4 Live-Trapping ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Spotlight Surveys ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Opportunistic Observations ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-07 Winter Window Survey Final Range-Wide
    2006-07 Winter SNPL Survey; NS = not surveyed #SNPL 2006-07 SITE OWNER 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 DATE Observers WASHINGTON Grays Harbor Copalis Spit 0 1/6/2007 C. Zora, J. Jamieson Conner Creek 0 1/6/2007 C. Zora, J. Jamieson Damon Point/Oyhut 0 1/9/2007 M. Zahn County Total 0 Pacific Midway Beach 21 1/8/2007 S. Pearson, C. Sundstrom Shoalwater/Graveyard 0 1/8/2007 C. Sundstrom Leadbetter Point 17 1/9/2007 K. Brennan, M. Fernandez South Long Beach NS County Total 38 Washington Total 38 OREGON Clatsop Clatsop Spit (Fort Stevens SP) NS Necanicum Spit NS County Total NS Tillamook Nehalem Spit 0 1/18/2007 Bayocean Spit 0 1/10/2007 Netarts 0 1/17/2007 Sand Lake 0 1/14/2007 Nestucca Spit 0 1/9/2007 Neskowin NS County Total 0 Lincoln Siletz Spit NS South Beach, Newport 0 unknown Alsea Bay/Seal Rock 0 unknown County Total 0 Lane Sutton/Baker 19 1/17/2007 Siuslaw R - Siltcoos Spit 36 1/18/2007 Siltcoos Spit 0 1/18/2007 County Total 55 Douglas Siltcoos Spit- Tahkenitch (Overlook) 0 1/18/2007 Tahkenitch Spits 0 1/18/2007 Threemile Spit-N Jetty Umpqua R NS S Jetty Umpqua River- Tenmile Spit 0 1/15/2007 County Total 0 Coos Tenmile Spits 10 1/15/2007 Tenmile Spit- Horsfall Beach NS Horsfall Beach to North Jetty Coos Bay NS Coos Bay North Spit 6 1/15/2007 Whiskey Run to Coquille River 0 1/11/2007 Bandon State Park to New River 19 1/19/2007 County Total 35 Curry New River to Floras Lake 14 1/19/2007 Blacklock Point to Cape Blanco 0 1/11/2007 Elk River to Port Orford NS Euchre Creek to Greggs Creek NS Myers Creek to Pistol River 0 1/10/2007 County Total 14 Oregon Total 104 Total Unit 1 142 CALIFORNIA Del Norte Smith River Pivate, CDPR2 000 01/12/2007 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Anatomy of the Halophyte Salsola Crassa and the Impact of Industrial Wastewater on Its Vegetative and Generative Structures
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2019) 43: 785-797 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1812-46 Investigating the anatomy of the halophyte Salsola crassa and the impact of industrial wastewater on its vegetative and generative structures 1 1 1 2 Narjes S. MOHAMMADI JAHROMI *, Parissa JONOUBI , Ahmad MAJD , Mansooreh DEHGHANI 1 Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran 2 Research Center for Health Sciences, Department of Environmental Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran Received: 23.12.2018 Accepted/Published Online: 18.06.2019 Final Version: 21.11.2019 Abstract: Salsola crassa M.B. is one of the most successful plants used against industrial pollutants. In this study, we selected young Salsola crassa M.B. plants from their natural habitats. Some plants were irrigated with industrial wastewater containing Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Pb, and Zn, and others were irrigated with tap water for 3–4 months. Afterwards, the shoots and roots were randomly cut, separated, fixed, dyed, and observed using light microscopy. Structural changes were analyzed by stereology. There were some differences in appearance and structure between the treated and control samples. For example, the number of leaves and flowers and the size of seeds and flowers in the treated plants were reduced. The diameter of the cortical parenchyma, the total area of each vascular bundle, surface area of the pith cells in the stem, leaf cuticle thickness, mechanical layer thickness of the anther, and diameter of pollen grains were reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • CA State Parks MPA Watch Semi-Annual Report Jan-Jun 2021
    Marine Protected Area (MPA) Watch Regional Report Humboldt, Mendocino, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Orange, and San Diego Counties January 1 – June 30, 2021 California State Parks has received Once-Through Cooling funding from the Ocean Protection Council to support a team of MPA interpreters and an MPA Outreach and Education Project Coordinator in eight State Parks districts along the California coast. One of the grant deliverables includes training these specialized MPA interpreters as well as additional State Parks staff and docents in MPA Watch protocol and data entry. Executive Summary ● In spring of 2021, one State Parks MPA interpreter, one State Parks Volunteer Coordinator, and 16 State Parks volunteer docents were trained in MPA Watch survey protocol and data entry. ● 2 new transects were set up in San Luis Obispo County at Morro Bay State Park ● 237 surveys were completed by the State Parks MPA team in the first six months of 2021 ● Two in-person MPA Watch trainings are planned for Mendocino and Humboldt Counties in August 2021. Additional trainings will be offered in southern California later in the fall. mpawatch.org [email protected] www.ports.parks.ca.gov California State Parks MPA Watch Report June-July 2021 Page 2 Human Use of MPAs January – June 2021 Overview California State Parks MPA Watch Report June-July 2021 Page 3 Activity by MPA HUMBOLDT COUNTY California State Parks MPA Watch Report June-July 2021 Page 4 MENDOCINO COUNTY California State Parks MPA Watch Report June-July 2021 Page 5 MENDOCINO
    [Show full text]
  • Chenopodiaceae . Salsola Salsoloideae ...% S. Tomentosa S
    : : !" !#$ %&' : * () : ! . . , 2 3# 45 ! 6, 7 !82 69 (1-- ./0 . (-- + , Chenopodiaceae * ; +; B (-- + , Salsola . /< ! /, 3# 8 . 3# = / !0 !; >? . , @ 2:#;. !> @2: ; =* C $#D E? @2 F;. + ,/ 5$ +; G> $ @ !; , . /, ! Salsoloideae * !"# L.9 / !;2 F;. 5$ +; . /, ! E"# # @ K . !" ; H IH& = J * 3; G> $ ! ; @2>", . MN *O !;< = @B8 #H = 4 8P @ #; Q = R . 2;8 . IHN = @ , = < !0 ; . // ! / D :; I ST < !; , @ + L,< @ . */, M T 3# @ + @ H >P Q2 H ? ! @ !W @ < . @ ;< 4 9TD +; . L L 8 BU0 " , MN V9H @ N D X L7 !% N G> $ @ *:#;. < * YD ! 6, 7 !>ZZP !"; +; G> $ @ L S. *:#;. =/ */, */<7 % (1 [</0 \ , L7 !% "; @ . L I.O !, @2< */ , 7 @2 < . ! < !% . IPOD . * I.O :; !"; < V;, ^ S. arbusculiformis , S. orientalis , tomentosa S. incanescens , S. @ ! .< /P < # @. */, `a @ ;< I . /;. ! @ ;_ < 8 0 < )n=ef S. tomentosa , S. crassa S. kali . * / U >_; 8 0 . )n =(c S. turkestanicabbb dendroides . 3; `. .< LO (1 S. kali . S. crassa . =* Q g, g;9D */, @ h D ;< . /, ! / U >7 D LO ( . 3; ` .< LO (i S. tomentosa ./ @ 8< h D ;< 9D ; 3; M `. .< LO e . H; 6;BH h D ;< 9D 3; M `. .< LO 3; . 3; ` .< LO c S. turkestanica . 3; M ` .< !. < /P . +; . / , :; @ # h D ;< 9D 3; ` .< LO j S. dendroides . S. incanescens . @ @ (X) !. .< ;7 /P . L */, 8< h D ;< 9D !. .< /P 6;BH . , !8< I.OD h D ;< 9D ^ . /, ! X=j */, ECOSYTOLOGICAL STUDY OF SOME SPECIES OF THE GENUS SALSOLA L. IN IRAN GHOLAMREZA BAKHSHI KHANIKI PAYAME NOOR UBIVERSITY , P. O. BOX 19396-4697, TEHRAN , IRAN Abstract The family of Chenopodiaceae includes c. 100 genera and almost 1500 species. It is widely distributed in temperate, subtropical, salin habitates, alkaline praires and saltmarshes and has an important role in the desert vegetation of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION Hearst San Simeon State Historical Monument Visitor Center – Conference Room, Modular One San Simeon, CA February 7, 2001
    Meeting of the CALIFORNIA STATE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION Hearst San Simeon State Historical Monument Visitor Center – Conference Room, Modular One San Simeon, CA February 7, 2001 MINUTES COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Paul Junger Witt, Chair Joseph Cotchett Caryl Hart Marcia Hobbs William Newsom COMMISSIONERS ABSENT H. Martin Jessen STAFF PRESENT Rusty Areias, Director Mary Wright, Chief Deputy Director Dick Troy, Deputy Director, Park Operations John McMahon, Deputy Director, Marketing William Berry, Central Division Chief Lynn Rhodes, District Superintendent, Monterey District Kirk Sturm, District Superintendent, San Simeon District Ken Gray, Associate Resource Ecologist, Monterey District Lois Harter, Superintendent, Big Sur Sector, Monterey District Ted Jackson, Assistant Secretary VISITORS REGISTERED/REPRESENTING Janet Cobb / Yosemite Restoration Trust Charley Custer / Redway Forest Defense Laura Davick / Alliance to Rescue Crystal Cove Susan Jordan / League for Coastal Protection / California Coastal Protection Network Pam Heatherington / Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo Gordon Hensley / Environmental Defense Center Rick L. Lewis / Individual Suzette Nyokka / Individual June Ostrow / Individual Leib Ostrow / Individual EXECUTIVE SESSION Legal notice having been given, Chair Witt convened the Executive Session at 9:30 a.m. The Executive Session was convened in order that a Department representative could update the Commission about two ongoing law suits filed against the Commission because of actions it had taken at its March 8, 2000 meeting regarding the Castle Rock State Park General Plan. No action was taken during the Executive Session. (Minutes of the Executive Session are contained in a separate document.) 1 DRAFT CALL TO ORDER Legal notice having been given, the California State Park and Recreation Commission meeting was called to order at 9:38 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]