Black Warrior Basin In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Warrior Basin In -A SUBSURFACE ANALYSIS OF THE LOwER CHESTERIAN LEWIS SANDSTONE OF THE BLACK WARRIOR BASIN IN MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA By FRANKLIN AUSTIN O'CONNOR ll Bachelor of Science State University of New York at Albany Albany, New York 1982 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science December, 1984 "c.· ; " ,,.... ~,"- _. ,,., ·.... : . .· ~ . A SUBSURFACE ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER CHESTERIAN LEWIS SANDSTONE OF THE BLACK WARRIOR BASIN IN MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA Thesis Approved: a~w.~ Thesis Adviser Dean of the Graduate College 1202725 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the many people who hav~ contributed directly or indirectly to this thesis. First, my sincere appreciation to my principal advisor, Dr. Arthur W. Cleaves, who suggested the research topic and edited the text. Thanks also to my committee membecs, Dr. Gary F. Stewart, Dr. Zuhair Al-Shaieb an~ Dr. Nowell Donovan for their constructive criticisms and editing of the text. Without the financial support provided by Conrad Gazzier of Sunbelt Geological Services, Tuscaloosa, Alabama and Bill Niemi of Weyerhaueser, Tacoma, Washington, this project would not have been possible. I am in­ debted as well to Bill Dement of Terra Resources, Oklahoma City for pro­ viding access to Terra's well log library and for sharing his ideas with me on several occasions. Finally, I dedicate this thesis to the memory of my uncle, Edmund Ignatius O'Connor, who died April 18, 1984. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. ABSTRACT 1 II. INTRODUCTION • 3 Location 3 Objectives 3 Methods • . 5 Previous Works 8 III. STRATIGRAPHY AND STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY •• 13 Regional Setting • • • • • • • • • • • • 13 Structural Framework • • • • • • • • • 13 Chester Group (Upper Mississippian) Stratigraphy 16 Floyd Shale - Pride Mountain Formations 16 Hartselle Sandstone. • • • • • • • • • 20 Bangor Limestone • • • • • • • • • • • • 21 Parkwood Formation • • • • • • • • • • • 22 Basinal Subsidence History • • • • 23 IV. REGIONAL ELECTRIC LOG STUDIES 27 Introduction 27 Tuscumbia Structure Map • • 29 Lewis Net Sand Isolith Map 29 Format Interval Isopach Map • 30 Cross Sections ••••••••••• 31 Strike-Oriented Cross-Sections • 31 Dip-Oriented Cross-Sections ••••• 33 Electric Log Patterns for IndividuAl Wells 34 V. FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE LEWIS INTERVAL 37 Introduction • • • . • • 37 Deltaic Models and Facies . • • • • 40 Constructional Delta Exploration Targets 52 Introduction • • . • • • . • • • 52 Distributary Channels 54 Channel Mouth Bars • • • 54 Crevasse Splays • • • • • • • • 56 Delta Front Sheet Sands ••••• 56 Destructional Storm and Tide Reworked Shelf Facies 57 iv Chapter Page VI. PETROLOGY AND DIAGENESIS OF THE LEWIS SAND • 60 Introduction 60 Core Description ••••••••• 60 Composition and Classification of the Lewis Sandstone • • • • • • •. • • • 63 Detrital Constituents 63 Diagenetic Constituents 72 Paragenesis • • • • • • • • • • 72 Porosity Types and Evolution 76 Cone 1 us ions • • 81 VII. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY OF THE LEWIS INTERVAL 86 Introduction ••••• 86 Distribution and Trapping Mechanisms of Producing Fields • • • • • • • 87 Production Statistics • 92 VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 98 REFERENCES CITED 99 APPENDIX A - WELLS USED IN CROSS SECTIONS 106 APPENDIX B - EXAMPLE OF DATA SHEET USED IN STUDY 110 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Mississippian production statistics in Alabama by horizon • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , • • 88 II. Lewis production statistics for Mississippi by field . 93 III. Lewis production statistics for Alabama by field •• 96 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Geographic location of study area . 4 2. Locations of dip-oriented and strike-oriented cross sections • 7 3. Regional setting for the Black Warrior Basin 14 4. Structural features of the Black Warrior Basin 15 5. Type log for the Chester Group of northeastern Mississippi 18 6. Surface and subsurface stratigraphic nomenclature for Upper Mississippian Chester Group: Northern Shelf of Alabama and Mississippi • • • • 19 7. Basinal subsidence history of Black Warrior Basin, Arkoma Basin and Ouachita Area • • • • • • • • • • ••• 20 8. Chester paleography and deltaic progradation in the Black Warrior Basin and surrounding areas •••••• 21 9. Characteristic electric log curves for various facies 36 10. Lewis deltaic facies elements of the Black Warrior Basin • 38 11. Idealized vertical cratonic delta sequence • 39 12. Four basic delta types • • • • • • 41 13. Sand pattern and lithologic facies distribution in high- constructive lobate deltas • • • • ••••• 43 14. Net sand pattern and li tho logic facies of high­ destruc tive wave dominated deltas •••••• 44 15. Composite stratigraphic column of Sao Francisco River Delta for metastable constituents now dissolved 45 16. Composite stratigraphic column of Klang River Delta 47 17. Net sand distribution pattern for a tide-dominated delta • 48 vii Figure Page 18. Lobate delta model - (A) Lafourche lobe, Holocene Mississippi Delta; (B) Idealized vertical sequence of lobate deltas in intracratonic basins • • • • • so 19. Elongate delta model - (A) birdfoot lobe, Ho:J~ene Mississippi Delta; (B) Idealized vertical sequence of elongate deltas in intracratonic basins • • . • • Sl 20. Delta spectrum - (A) variations of morphologies with increasing marine influence; (B) wave reworked delta spectrum ••••• S3 21. Major deltaic facies and associated electric logs signatures • . •••••• SS 22. Location of core used in the study •• 61 23. Petrologic log for the #2 J. R. Falker 28-2 core • 62 24. Photograph of cut core showing climbing ripples 64 2S. Photograph of cut core showing stylolites 6S 26. Q-F-R plot of Lewis Sandstone without regard for partially dissolved metastable constituents 66 27. Allogenic compositions from thin section analysis 67 28. Photomicrograph of monocrystalline quartz grain with syntaxial quartz overgrowth and chemical compaction at grain boundaries • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 68 29. Photomicrograph of a chert rock fragment 69 30. Photomicrograph of a low grade metamorphic rock fragment • 70 31. Photomicrograph of accessory minerals biotite and zircon • 71 32. X-ray diffractogram of major clays found in the core • 73 33. Photomicrograph of pore filling kaolinite 74 34. Paragenesis for the core studied • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7s 3S. Photomicrograph showing large dissolution pores inter- connected by intergranular pores • • • • • • • • • • 77 36. Scanning electron microscope photograph of pseudohexagonal kaolinite plates • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 78 37. Photomicrograph showing bitumen within a dissolution pore 79 viii Figure Page 38. Porosity and permeability values versus core depth • 80 39. Illite and kaolinite content versus core depth •• 82 40. Ternary diagram of secondary porosity types 83 41. Scanning electron microscope photograph of kaolinite clogging an intergranular pore • • • • • • 85 42. Distribution of fields producing from the Lewis Sandstone in 1983 • • • • • 89 43. Lewis trap types 91 ix CHAPTER I ABSTRACT The Black Warrior Basin is a wedge shaped foreland basin whose pri­ mary sedimentary fill consists of Upper Mississippian (Chester Group) and Lower Pennsylvanian (Pottsville Group) terrigeneous elastic rocks. Significant quantities of natural gas and liquid hydrocarbons are con­ tained within Chesterian sandstone units that were deposited on the basins' structurally stable northern shelf. The Lewis Sandstone is the second most productive of these reservoirs but its facies types and dia­ genetic characteristics are poorly understood by exploration geologists. The principle sources of data for this study were more than 800 electric logs from which cross sections and subsurface maps were pre­ pared. Production trends as determined from published data, were re­ lated to the isopach, isolith, and structural contour maps generated by this study. A core from the study area was examined to determine the controls on porosity and permeability. The Lewis Sandstone was deposited by a. high-constructive elongate and lobate cratonic delta complex that prograded from northwest to south­ east. These fluvial deltaic facies mark the onset of deltaic sedimenta­ tion in the basin and also indicate an increase in basinal subsidence. Permeability in the Lewis sand is largely dependent upon the ab­ sence of pore filling authigenic kaolinite. Optimum conditions exist when enlarged intergranular pores are free of authigenic kaolinite and "\ 1 2 are thus able to interconnect larger dissolution pores created by the dissolution of mud clasts. Lewis production trends correlate very well with the net sandstone trends indicated on the net sandstone isolith map. Structural trapping plays a greater role for the distal delta than the proximal delta where production is more dependent upon stratigraphic trapping. CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION Location The study area of this thesis comprises all or parts of 17 counties in northeastern Mississippi and northwestern Alabama (Figure 1). These counties include Pontotoc, Lee, Itawamba, Calhoun, Chickasaw, Monroe, Clay, Oktibbeha, and Lowndes in northeastern Mississippi and Franklin, Marion, Winston, Lamar, Fayette, Walker, Pickens and Tuscaloosa in north­ western Alabama. The area represents approximately 10,600 square miles of Cleaves (1983) refers to as the Northern Shelf of the Black Warrior Basin. Objectives The goal of this research is to enlarge upon the understanding of the Upper Mississippian (Chester) Lewis interval as found in the subsur­
Recommended publications
  • The Geologic Evolution of the Black Warrior Detrital Basin. Robert Ehrlich Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1965 The Geologic Evolution of the Black Warrior Detrital Basin. Robert Ehrlich Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ehrlich, Robert, "The Geologic Evolution of the Black Warrior Detrital Basin." (1965). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1070. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1070 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has heen microfilmed exactly as received 66-726 EHRLICH, Robert, 1936— THE GEOLOGIC EVOLUTION OF THE BLACK WARRIOR DETRITAL BASIN. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1965 G eology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE GEOLOGIC EVOLUTION OF THE BLACK WARRIOR DETRITAL BASIN A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of philosophy in The Department of Geology by Robert Ehrlich B.A., University of Minnesota, 1958 M.S., Louisiana State University, 1961 August, 1965 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS So many persons have given aid and encouragement during the progress of this problem that I approach these acknow­ ledgments with trepidations concerning possible omissions. Conspicuous, however, is the importance of the teaching and advice of Dr. John C. Ferm who, besides being respon­ sible for that which is worthwhile in my training as a sedimentologist, has provided me with a model of high pro­ fessional integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER 14, 2005 BLM Eastern States, Milwaukee Field Office
    MISSISSIPPI NATIONAL FORESTS REASONABLE FORESEEABLE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO FINAL REPORT: OCTOBER 14, 2005 BLM Eastern States, Milwaukee Field Office TABLE OF CONTENTS: A. Summary ....................................................................................................................................1 B. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 C. Basis of Analysis ........................................................................................................................2 D. Description of Geology ..............................................................................................................2 E. Past and Present Fluid Mineral Exploration Activity .................................................................7 F. Past and Present Fluid Mineral Development Activity ...............................................................7 G. Future Fluid Mineral Development Potential .............................................................................8 H. Reasonable Foreseeable Development Scenario Assumptions & Discussion ............................10 I. Selected Bibliography .................................................................................................................14 J. Appendices ..................................................................................................................................15 K. Accompanying Maps .................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Scottsboro 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Jackson County, Alabama
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA QUADRANGLE SERIES 63 PLATE (PRINCETON) o 5 o 86 07'30" 581000m E 82 583 5 5 (MUD CREEK) 5 5 5 440,000 FEET 5 5 5 86 00' (WANNVILLE) A 5' 84 85 86 87 R 5 E R 6 E 2'30" 88 89 90 91 34o45' eD D e 34o45' CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS D Mm Mb Mb D Mb D Qal Qal Quaternary Mm CENOZOIC D unconformity 3845000m N D e !pv D 3845 Pennsylvanian D D D Mp !pv D Mb Mb Mh Qal Mississippian D Qal D Mp Mp Mm Qal Qal 3844 D Mtfpm D Qal 38 Mb 44 unconformity Dc Devonian PALEOZOIC Mp Qal 1,540,000 MhD D Qal FEET D e unconformity Mb Mb T 3 S Srm D T 3 S Silurian T 4 S D T 4 S D unconformity D D Mm 3843 D Osli Qal D e D 38 D !pv 43 Mp Qal !pv Onvsr Ordovician unconformity O\k Cambrian D D Qal 3842 Qal e 38 42 MhD MhD DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS D Qal Alluvium (Quaternary)—Unconsolidated sand, silt, clay, and chert gravel derived from local bedrock. Mb D D Mb !pv Pottsville Formation (Pennsylvanian)—Light-gray, medium- to coarse-grained, quartzose D D sandstone locally containing scattered to abundant, well-rounded, white quartz pebbles; quartz D D !pv pebble and ferruginous claystone conglomerate is locally present at the base. Interbeds and 38 D 41 Qal 3841 intervals of dark-gray shale and mudstone and wavy-bedded sandstone are locally common.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior U.S
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Oil and Gas Resources of the Black Warrior Basin, Alabama and Mississippi Robert T. Ryder1 Open-File Report 87-450X This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature ''U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 22092 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................ 1 Basin location and size........................................... 1 Structural setting................................................ 1 Stratigraphic framework........................................... 1 Source rocks...................................................... 6 Burial history, thermal maturation, timing of migration, and entrapment....................................... 9 Hydrocarbon occurrence........................................... 10 PRINCIPAL PLAYS........................................................ 13 Play identification.............................................. 13 Upper Mississippian (Chesterian) sandstone play.................. 14 REFERENCES ........................................................... 18 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Tectonic map of Alabama, Mississippi, and adjacent states showing the Black Warrior basin............................................................. 3 Figure 2. Geologic cross section through the Black Warrior basin..................................................... 5 Figure 3. Stratigraphic correlation chart for Phanerozoic and
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary—Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Black Warrior Basin Province of Alabama and Mississippi
    Chapter 1 Executive Summary—Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Black Warrior Basin Province of Alabama and Mississippi Volume Title Page By U.S. Geological Survey Black Warrior Basin Province Assessment Team Chapter 1 of Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Black Warrior Basin Province, Alabama and Mississippi Compiled by Joseph R. Hatch and Mark J. Pawlewicz U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–I U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone:1–888–ASK–USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: U.S. Geological Survey Black Warrior Basin Province Assessment Team, 2007, Executive Summary—Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources of the Black Warrior Basin Province of Alabama and Mississippi, in Hatch, Joseph,R., and Pawlewicz, Mark J., compilers, Geologic assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources of the Black Warrior Basin Province, Alabama and Mis- sissippi: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 02 Figure 2.5-209
    Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application Part 2, FSAR Explanation Geologic contact Fault; arrows show relative directional movement Thrust or reverse fault; sawteeth on upper plate, ? ?? Nature of contact uncertain (may posibly be a dashed where inferred, dotted where concealed fault or a stratigraphic contact) U C C' D Normal fault; U on upthrown side, D on Line of cross section downthrown side, dashed where inferred Fault for which sense of movement is unknown; dashed where inferred Qalt Alluvial and low terrace deposits HOLOCENE QUATERNARY Qt High terrace deposits PLEISTOCENE INTERIOR LOW APPALACHIAN VALLEY AND RIDGE PROVINCE PLATEAUS PROVINCE PLATEAUS PROVINCE (western part) (easternpart) Ppv Pottsville Formation Ppv1u Pottsville Formation Ppv2u Pottsville Formation (upper part) (upper part) Ppv2l Pottsville Formation Ppv1l Pottsville Formation (lower part) (lower part) PENNSYLVANIAN PMpw Parkwood Formation Pmpwp Parkwood and Pmpwp Parkwood and Pennington Formations Pennington Formations Pzu Parkwood Formation (undifferentiated) (undifferentiated) Mp Pennington Formation and Floyd Shale (undifferentiated) Mbm Bangor and Monteagle Limestones (undiff.) Pzu Paleozoic Shale Pzu Paleozoic Shale (undifferentiated) (undifferentiated) Mf Floyd Shale Mf Floyd Shale Mh Hartselle Sandstone Mh Hartselle Sandstone Mm Monteagle Limestone Mm MISSISSIPPIAN Monteagle Limestone Mpm Pride Mountain Formation Mpm Pride Mountain Formation Mt Tuscumbria Limestone Mtfp Tuscumbria Limestone Mtfp Tuscumbria Limestone and Fort Payne Chert and Fort
    [Show full text]
  • Plate 1A Geology Explanation
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA PLATE 1A LEGEND FOR THE HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS LINES AND WELL LOCATIONS, ALABAMA Qalt, Alluvial, coastal, and low terrace Olp, Leipers Limestone kwx, Waxahatchee Slate Qt, High terrace deposits Oscmg, Sequatchie Formation, Colvin Mt. Sandstone, Greensport Formation undifferentiated hf, Higgins Ferry Group Trs, Residuum Oi, Inman Formation hfgr, Higgins Ferry Group graphitic unit QTci, Citronelle Formation Onv, Nashville Group hfgt, Higgins Ferry Group garnet quartzite unit Tm, Miocene Series undifferentiated Ou, Ordovician System undifferentiated pbm, Poe Bridge Mountain Group To, Oligocene Series undifferentiated Oc, Chickamauga Limestone pbmgr, Poe Bridge Mountain Group graphitic unit Tj, Jackson Group undifferentiated Ocm, Colvin Mountain Sandstone pbmgt, Poe Bridge Mountain Group garnet quartzite unit Tgl, Gosport Sand and Lisbon Formation undifferentiated in part Og, Greensport Formation hcp, Pinchoulee Gneiss Tl, Lisbon Formation Onvsr, Nashville and Stones River Groups undifferentiated hch, Hanover Schist Tt, Tallahatta Formation Oca, Attalla Chert Conglomerate Member of the Chickamauga Limestone mi, Mad Indian Group Th, Hatchetigbee Formation Oa, Athens Shale migr, Mad Indian Group graphitic unit Ttu, Tuscahoma Sand Osr, Stones River Group we, Wedowee Group undifferentiated Tnf, Nanafalia Formation Oal, Athens Shale and Lenoir Limestone undifferentiated weh, Hackneyville Schist Tsm, Salt Mountain Limestone Olol, Little Oak and Lenoir Limestones undifferentiated wec, Cornhouse Schist Tn, Naheola
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Bessemer and Vandiver
    DESCRIPTION OF THE BESSEMER AND VANDIVER INTRODUCTION the west of the Appalachian Plateaus are the Interior Low mentary, including limestone, dolomite, conglomerate, sand­ LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE AREA Plateaus, which are included in the Interior Plains by the stone, and shale, which have been greatly disturbed by folding United States Geological Survey but which in the opinion of and faulting, as hereinafter described. The Bessemer and Vandiver quadrangles, which are called some, including the writer, should be included in the Appala­ in this folio the Bessemer-Vandiver area, are in Jefferson and chian Highlands. SUBDIVISIONS IN ALABAMA Shelby counties in the north-central part of Alabama. (See The boundary between the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Gahaba Ridges. Although the province is in general a fig. 1.) The area is bounded by parallels 33° 15' and 33° provinces is the east foot of the Blue Ridge and the foot of valley, there are within it many high ridges that extend the high but irregular eastern scarp of the mountains of west­ parallel to its general direction, of which Red Mountain is a ern North Carolina and northern Georgia which form the good example. These ridges are generally grouped along the southern extension of the Blue Ridge. The boundary between west side of the valley from New York to Alabama. In Ala­ the Blue Ridge and Appalachian Valley provinces is the west bama the ridge section includes all the valley west of the east foot of the Blue Ridge of Virginia and of the high mountains margin of the Coosa coal field and of a line in continuation of of eastern Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Birmingham Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE BIRMINGHAM QUADRANGLE. By Charles Butts. INTRODUCTION. that flow across it toward the Atlantic. The Appalachian Tennessee, in Sequatchie Valley, and along Big Wills Creek Mountains occupy a broad belt extending from southwestern are parts of the same peneplain. Below the Coosa peneplain LOCATION, EXTENT, AND GENERAL RELATIONS. Virginia through western North Carolina and eastern Ten­ the streams of the southern part of the Appalachian province As shown by the key map (fig. 1), the Birmingham quad­ nessee to northeastern Georgia. This belt is a region of strong have eroded their present channels. rangle lies in the north-central part of Alabama. It is bounded relief, characterized by points and ridges 3000 to 6000 feet or Drainage. The northern part of the Appalachian province by parallels 33° 30' and 34° and meridians 86° 30' and 87° over in height, separated by narrow V-shaped valleys. The is drained through St. Lawrence, Hudson, Delaware, Susque- and contains, therefore, one-quarter of a square degree. Its general level of the Appalachian Valley is much lower than hanna, Potomac, and James rivers into the Atlantic and length from north to south is 34.46 miles, its width from east that of the Appalachian Mountains on the east and of the through Ohio River into the Gulf of Mexico; the southern Appalachian Plateau on the west. Its surface is character­ part is drained by New, Cumberland, Tennessee, Coosa, and 87 ized by a few main valleys, such as the Cumberland Valley in Black Warrior rivers into the Gulf. In the northern part £35 Pennsylvania, the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia, the East many of the rivers rise on the west side of the Great Appa­ Tennessee Valley in Tennessee, and -the Coosa Valley in lachian Valley and flow eastward or southeastward to the Alabama, and by many subordinate narrow longitudinal val­ Atlantic; in the southern part the direction of drainage is leys separated by long, narrow ridges rising in places 1000 to reversed, the rivers rising in the Blue Ridge and flowing west­ 1500 feet above the general valley level.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Alleghanian Thrust Belt Under the Gulf Coastal Plain of Alabama
    A Publication of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies www.gcags.org STRUCTURE OF THE ALLEGHANIAN THRUST BELT UNDER THE GULF COASTAL PLAIN OF ALABAMA 1 2 1 Delores M. Robinson , Ryan M. Bailey , and Andrew M. Goodliffe 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, P.O. Box 870338, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0338, U.S.A. 2Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, 1201 Lake Robbins Dr., The Woodlands, Texas 77380, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Mesozoic and Tertiary sedimentary rock of the Gulf coastal plain covers the Paleozoic Appalachian orogen in central Ala- bama, obscuring the intersection of the northwest-trending Ouachita thrust belt and the northeast-trending Alleghanian thrust belt. Direct observation of the thrust belt system is not possible, and few studies exist because of the lack of well control and limited public availability of seismic reflection profiles. This study uses existing multichannel seismic reflection data and well log data to clarify the subsurface structures and estimate the amount of shortening in the Alleghanian thrust belt in west- central Alabama under the Gulf coastal plain. The seismic line extends 34.2 mi in a nearly north-south direction, perpendicular to the thrust belt, from the Black Warrior basin in the north to near the Talladega slate belt in the south. To correct the two-way travel times of the seismic sections to depth, we built a synthetic seismogram from a nearby deep well, constructed two velocity models, and interpreted and balanced two cross sections. In west-central Alabama, the thrust belt is forward propagating and hinterland dipping, with thrust sheets that range in length from ~5–17 mi and have thicknesses between 11,000–14,500 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Provenance and Sediment Dispersal of Mississippian Sandstones in the Black Warrior Basin, Ne Mississippi
    PROVENANCE AND SEDIMENT DISPERSAL OF MISSISSIPPIAN SANDSTONES IN THE BLACK WARRIOR BASIN, NE MISSISSIPPI By PATRICK MICHAEL O’CONNOR Bachelor of Science, 2012 Ohio University Athens, Ohio Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The College of Science and Engineering Texas Christian University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2015 Copyright By Patrick Michael O’Connor 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality in Jackson, MS for graciously allowing me to sample their core for this project. I also want to thank Mark Pecha and the team at the University of Arizona LaserChron Center for their assistance with the processing of detrital LA-ICPMS. Also, thank you to the University of Texas at Dallas for allowing me to use their rock crushing lab, and Dr. Majie Fan for the use of the mineral separation lab at University of Texas at Arlington. Secondly, I need to recognize Dr. Xiangyang “Cheyenne” Xie for his significant role in my graduate school experience. Cheyenne’s determination to provide all the necessary resources and accommodations for me to complete my thesis was above and beyond what I could have ever expected from a graduate advisor. Cheyenne exhibited an extreme willingness to always be available, not only as a thesis advisor, but also as a friend throughout my graduate experience. I am very grateful to have had Cheyenne as my advisor and to have built a relationship with him. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Alsleben and Dr. Holbrook for all their help.
    [Show full text]