DOCSLIB.ORG

TRUCK OPERATOR's MAP of 61 61 C O U N T Y a R E N a C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRUCK OPERATOR's MAP of 61 61 C O U N T Y a R E N a C R 3 E R 4 E R 5 E R 6 E 12 3 45 6 78 9 10 11 12 0 E W o 500 RD 3000 500 44 -00'-00"N 3500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 N 9 MILERD 9 N SAUNDERS S ADAMSRD S DEMURA RD DEMURA 9000 Center Branch BARTLETT RD Pine River 3 2 1 -10'-00"W 4 o 6 5 2020 ROAD AND N MAIDA RD MAIDA N 84 GILBERT RD GILBERT TO STANDISH 8500 M 61 TRUCK OPERATOR'S MAP OF 61 61 A r e n a c C o u n t y A ƽ TO GLADWIN ƽ BRIDGE WEIGHT LIMITS JOHNSFIELD RD 9 10 Pine BAY COUNTY, MICHIGAN PRIMARY ROADS 7 Branch 11 8 River 12 South MAP TONS (37 EDWARD L. RIVET ----------------------------- CHAIRMAN ID ROAD NAME LOCATION #1 #2 #3 N CARTER RD CARTER N STEVENSON RD RD SAUNDERS 8000 ! MICHAEL G. RIVARD ---------------------- VICE-CHAIRMAN (1) N 7 Mile Rd 100 feet N. of E Erickson Rd 16 20 34 WILLIAM E. SCHUMACHER ---------------------- MEMBER (2) W Beaver Rd 0.31 mile E. of S Garfield Rd 42 74 82 JAMES C. LILLO P. E. --------------- ENGINEER-MANAGER (3) E Chip Rd 0.5 mile W. of Old Beaver Rd 42 52 58 14 13 RD MILE8 N 18 17 16 15 (4) Doud Rd (W Parish Rd) 0.5 mile E. of S 9 Mile Rd 42 58 69 N 11 MILE RD MILE 11 N (5) W Erickson Rd 0.6 mile W. of N Flajole Rd Bridge Is Closed N FLAJOLE RD FLAJOLE N (6) Fraser St 200 feet E. of Chip Rd 18 33 33 STANDISH RD STANDISH 7500 BROWN RD (7) N Garfield Rd 400 feet S. of W Neuman Rd 8 8 8 B SECTION BA 13/24 RD (8) N Mackinaw Rd 1000 feet S. of E Townline 16 Rd 5 5 5 G i b s o n T w p OUR GOALS (9) N Mackinaw Rd 600 feet S. of E Whitefeather Rd 10 10 10 20 BENTLEY RD 22 23 T 18 N T 18 N 18 T 19 !( 24 (10) N Mackinaw Rd 900 feet S. of E Pinconning Rd 42 73 77 CARNEY ST 21 To provide the public with leadership in: DAVIS ST (11) S Mackinaw Rd 0.58 mile N. of E North Union Rd Bentley RD MILE 9 N RD N GARFIELD RD GARFIELD N (12) Monitor Rd 540 feet S. of Fraser St 42 70 77 N 8 MILE 8 N 7000 PARKST GRIM RD * Safe and convenient roads (13) Saganing Rd 0.25 mile E. of N 9 Mile Rd 21 32 45 BORDEAU RD * Sound financial management GRIM RD (14) E Wheeler Rd 600 feet W. of S 4 Mile Rd 42 70 77 * Respect for the environment * Sensitivity to community concern 30 29 28 27 26 25 LOCAL ROADS * Responsive and dependable service Saganing Drain MAP TONS BAY GLADWIN LINE RD LINE GLADWIN BAY (13 ID ROAD NAME LOCATION #1 #2 #3 SAGANING RD ! C 6500 WORTH RD (15) N 8 Mile Rd 0.2 miles N. of E Whitefeather Rd 42 64 74 SAGANING RD (16) N 8 Mile Rd 0.25 mile N. of W Mount Forest Rd 35 57 62 S 8 Mile Rd RD (17) 0.5 mile S. of W Wheeler Rd 17 19 29 N 8 MILE RD MILE 8 N N FLAJOLE RDFLAJOLE N JERORE RD 32 33 35 36 31 34 ARMSTRONGRD DEEP RIVER DEEP Saganing Creek KRAWCZYKRD (18) S 8 Mile Rd 900 feet S. of Doud Rd 25 35 50 ARENAC -00'-00"W STATE RD GRAYLING o FOCORD SANDY DR TO STANDISH TO MELITA RD MELITA A r e n a c C o u n t y (19) S 11 Mile Rd 150 feet N. of W Beaver Rd 13 13 13 MOORERD BAY ARENAC LINE RD LINCOLN RD LINCOLN 84 TO STANDISH, TAWAS, STANDISH, TO W TOWNLINE 17 RD W TOWNLINE 17 RD BAY ARENAC LINE RD KNICKBOCKER RD (20) Avalon Rd 200 feet N. of Rashotte Rd 3 3 3 6000 BAY ARENAC LINE RD SCHAARD RD (21) Bay Midland Line Rd 75 feet S. of W Anderson Rd 17 17 17 River AVALON RD Saganing (20 RASHOTTE RD RASHOTTE RD ! (22) E Brown Rd at S Briggs Rd 26 33 40 2 2 1 6 5 4 6 S Cotter Rd 0.4 mile N. of E Munger Rd 28 35 40 6 5 4 Saganing River3 3 1 (23) Kossick Drain 33 (24) Erickson Rd 330 feet W. of N 7 Mile Rd 42 67 77 ( PIERSON RD ! (15 !DR RICHIE N Fraser Rd 1000 feet N. of E Neuman Rd 12 12 12 N ELEVATOR RD ELEVATOR N (25) W WHITEFEATHER RD E WHITEFEATHER RD W WHITEFEATHER RD W WHITEFEATHER RD 5500 ! (26) N Fraser Rd 0.32 mile S. of E Whitefeather Rd 10 15 50 D (9 White Feather Creek S Fraser Rd 0.25 mile S. of E Cottage Grove Rd 27 32 53 ! 13 (27) ƽ RD SHORE N 7 HEPPNER RD HEPPNER LAPAN RD 9 26 12 (28) S Fraser Rd 0.56 mile N. of E North Union Rd 42 61 74 LAPAN RD 10 ( 9 10 11 8 12 8 7 Mo unt Forest 11 7 (29) Hunter Rd 0.3 mile N. of E Pinconning Rd 12 15 17 GORBETT RD MAINST SAND RD 75 N 2 MILE RD MILE 2 N Kaiser Tower Rd 0.3 mile S. of E Prevo Rd 10 13 21 !( ¨¦§ Railway State Lake (30) N HURON RD HURON N N TOWER BEACH BEACH RD TOWER N E MOUNT FOREST RD E MOUNT FOREST RD Lake State Railway GILBERT RD W MOUNT FOREST RD LAKESIDE DR (31) Myers Rd 50 feet W. of S Mackinaw Rd 16 16 16 5000 W MOUNT FOREST RD CHURCH RD N SAGINAW BAY SHORE DR (32) S Nolet Rd 200 feet N. of E Brown Rd 30 36 42 ! (33) Richie Rd 0.125 mile N. of E Whitefeather Rd 16 16 16 16 P i n c o n n i n g T w p E WIRBEL RD ( E WIRBEL RD W WIRBEL RD E Russell Rd at S Briggs Rd 42 55 72 13 16 15 14 18 (34) 18 17 15 18 17 13 16 14 23 (35) E Russell Rd 650 feet E. of S Cotter Rd 22 50 50 N 8 MILE RD MILE 8 N N CARTERN RD White Feather Creek Æþ N FLAJOLE N RD (36) N State Rd 300 feet N. of E Coggins Rd 11 16 18 N ELEVATOR RD ELEVATOR N BAY GLADWIN LINE RD LINE GLADWIN BAY Woodville E CODY ESTEY RD W CODY ESTEY RD !( (37) Stevenson Rd 0.27 mile W. of N 9 Mile Rd Bridge Is Closed 4500 DR E ESTEY RD Pinco nning (38) N 9 Mile Rd 0.30 mile N. of Pinconning Rd 42 67 82 JULE DR WILDWOOD (39) 0.10 mile S. of M-84 T 17 N M o u n t F o r e s t T w p RD WATER N 19 Ziegler Rd 42 62 82 22 23 24 19 20 21 RD MALONEY 24 ST MABLE N 20 21 22 23 HALE DR 19 RD MILE 7 N T 17 N 38 DEBRA CT D 5HY ( CT AVIS 09 14 21 N MAIDA RD MAIDA N R Pinconning River RD FRASER N N 9 MILE RD MILE 9 N E 2ND ST SUBURBAN ST W 2ND ST ! R ! W 3RD ST E 29 G l a d w i n C o u n t y t n u o C n i w d a l G T QUARTERLINERD ( N MACKINAW RD MACKINAW N N W 4TH ST U DR N 11 MILE RD MILE 11 N FENTON DR FENTON N GARFIELD N RD H E PINCONNING RD W 5TH E 5TH ST ST WATER S E PINCONNING RD Hazel Beach W PINCONNING RD SANDRA ST Pinconning River CENTER DR CENTER WHYTE ST 4000 ST EXIT ! W PINCONNING RD KAISER DENNY RD 181 10 MARY RD ( ST MABLE S MCLANE DR #1 T MERCER RD JOSEPH RD 25 29 28 27 N VAN ETTEN RD 26 25 30 STANDISH RD STANDISH 30 30 29 28 27 26 STEMPEK LN N 8 MILE RD MILE 8 N AIRPORT RD -10'-00"W BELCHAK DR #2 T TRUCK ROUTE AND WEIGHT LIMIT INFORMATION o (25 Pinconning River LAW ! RD N TOWER BEACH RD BEACH TOWER N 84 ON THIS MAP IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. E NEUMAN RD E NEUMAN RD W NEUMAN RD RD BARTYS 43o-50'-00"N FEDC F 3500 ! Pinconning River #3 T SWINSON RD South Branch HITZ RD HITZ (7 36 31 o 43 -50'-00"N NIELSON RD 32 33 34 35 34 35 31 31 32 33 36 KAISERRD N 2 MILE RD MILE 2 N BAY GLADWIN LINE RD LINE GLADWIN BAY E TOWNLINE 16 RD E TOWNLINE 16 RD ALLOWABLE TRUCK LOADINGS AND DIMENSIONS W TOWNLINE 16 RD 3000 8 Regulations Pertaining to the Operation of Trucks and Trailers According to Act 200, P, A. 1949 as Amended. !( MID GLAD COUNTY SHORERD LINE RD 1 E ALMEDA BEACH RD SAGINAWBAY W ALMEDA BEACH RD 6 5 4 6 5 4 3 HUPTERRD 2 1 6 2 RD TURMELL 3 Designated Routes Designated Routes & All Season Routes LAPKA RD LAPKA PETERSON BEACH DR Designated Routes N STATE RD STATE N N HURON RD HURON N E NEWBERG RD GILMAN DR W NEWBERG RD MOSHERRD TABLE OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GROSS AXLE LOADINGS G 2500 NORMAL LOADINGS WHEN SEASONAL LOAD OAKVIEW DR (36 OAK RD 7 SEASONAL LOAD LIMITATIONS E COGGINS RD SANAKDR ! E COGGINS RD E LEVELY RD LIMITATIONS ARE NOT IN BAY MIDLAND LINE RD LINE MIDLAND BAY 7 8 9 10 12 10 11 12 11 7 8 9 ------- / - - - - W ERICKSON RD N MAIDA RD FORCE N FLAJOLE RD FLAJOLE N Tebo Drain ! Erickson Drain 24 1 35% Reduction 35% Reduction 5 ( ( E ERICKSON RD RD STATE OLD 2000 ( W ERICKSON RD !! (All Designated (On All Other N BIRCH RD Roads NOT All Routes) E BIRCH RD E On Designated On All Other North Branch S BIRCH RD Season) HERITER RD HERITER GILBERT RD GILBERT BIRCH RD 14 13 18 SPACING BETWEEN AXLES 17 16 W BIRCH RD Routes Routes 16 15 14 13 18 18 17 15 9 feet or over 18,000 lbs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Limnology of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron
    PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON ALFRED M. BEETON U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan STANFORD H. SMITH U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan and FRANK H. HOOPER Institute for Fisheries Research Michigan Department of Conservation Ann Arbor, Michigan GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 GREEN ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN SEPTEMBER, 1967 PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON1 Alfred M. Beeton, 2 Stanford H. Smith, and Frank F. Hooper3 ABSTRACT Water temperature and the distribution of various chemicals measured during surveys from June 7 to October 30, 1956, reflect a highly variable and rapidly changing circulation in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. The circula- tion is influenced strongly by local winds and by the stronger circulation of Lake Huron which frequently causes injections of lake water to the inner extremity of the bay. The circulation patterns determined at six times during 1956 reflect the general characteristics of a marine estuary of the northern hemisphere. The prevailing circulation was counterclockwise; the higher concentrations of solutes from the Saginaw River tended to flow and enter Lake Huron along the south shore; water from Lake Huron entered the northeast section of the bay and had a dominant influence on the water along the north shore of the bay. The concentrations of major ions varied little with depth, but a decrease from the inner bay toward Lake Huron reflected the dilution of Saginaw River water as it moved out of the bay. Concentrations in the outer bay were not much greater than in Lake Huronproper.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase II Status Assessment of Herpetofauna in the Saginaw Bay Watershed
    Phase II Status Assessment of Herpetofauna in the Saginaw Bay Watershed July 25, 2013 Prepared for: Saginaw Basin Land Conservancy 809 East Midland Street Bay City, MI 48706 Prepared by: Herpetological Resource and Management, LLC P.O. Box 110 Chelsea, MI 48118 www.HerpRMan.com (313) 268-6189 Project Number: 12D-7.01 Suggested Citation: Mifsud, David A. 2013. Phase II Status Assessment of Herpetofauna in the Saginaw Bay Watershed. Herpetological Resource and Management Report 2012 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 8 Site Locations and Descriptions .................................................................................. 10 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 19 Historical Review and Site Assessment ................................................................... 19 Herpetofaunal Surveys ........................................................................................... 20 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................ 22 1) Au Gres Delta Nature Preserve .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M I C H I G a N O N T a R
    314 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 6, Chapter 10 26 SEP 2021 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W ONTARIO 2251 NORTH CHANNEL 46°N D E 14885 T 14882 O U R M S O F M A C K I N A A I T A C P S T R N I A T O S U S L A I N G I S E 14864 L A N Cheboygan D 14881 Rogers City 14869 14865 14880 Alpena L AKE HURON 45°N THUNDER BAY UNITED ST CANADA MICHIGAN A TES Oscoda Au Sable Tawas City 14862 44°N SAGINAW BAY Bay Port Harbor Beach Sebewaing 14867 Bay City Saginaw Port Sanilac 14863 Lexington 14865 43°N Port Huron Sarnia Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 6—Chapter 10 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 6, Chapter 10 ¢ 315 Lake Huron (1) Lawrence, Great Lakes, Lake Winnipeg and Eastern Chart Datum, Lake Huron Arctic for complete information.) (2) Depths and vertical clearances under overhead (12) cables and bridges given in this chapter are referred to Fluctuations of water level Low Water Datum, which for Lake Huron is on elevation (13) The normal elevation of the lake surface varies 577.5 feet (176.0 meters) above mean water level at irregularly from year to year. During the course of each Rimouski, QC, on International Great Lakes Datum 1985 year, the surface is subject to a consistent seasonal rise (IGLD 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Fraser Township
    Fraser Township Community Description Fraser Township is located on Saginaw Bay approximately 10 miles north of Bay City. It contains the northern portion of the community of Linwood. The Township lands are largely used for agricultural purposes. Large tracts of woodlands are located along M-13 which traverses the east side of the Township from north to south. According to the 2016 American Community Survey 5-year population estimate, Fraser Township has 3,145 people. Other significant demographic data for Fraser Township as compared to the county, state, and country is shown in Figure 31 below. It is worth noting that Frasier Township’s median age is higher than all other 99 | 2019 Bay County Area Recreation Plan communities in Bay County, except Merritt Township. It also has a very high percentage of owner occupied homes, at 93.8%. Frasier Bay County Michigan United States Median Age 50 42.7 39.5 37.7 Population 65+ 24.8% 18.3% 15.4% 14.5% Population under 18 16.5% 21.0% 22.5% 23.1% Owner Occupied Homes 93.8% 77.9% 73.0% 65.1% Average Household Size 2.36 2.39 2.51 2.64 Bachelor's Degree or 11.9% 18.1% 27.4% 30.3% Higher Median Household $47,133 $45,851 $50,803 $55,322 Income Per Capita Income $23,243 $24,753 $27,549 $29,829 Disabled 22.5% 16.6% 14.2% 12.5% Poverty level 17.5% 15.8% 16.3% 15.1% Figure 31 - Selected Census Data for Fraser Township as compared to the county, state and country.
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw River Dredge Disposal Project at Saginaw Bay, Michigan
    ' SAGINAW RIVER DREDGE DISPOSAL PROJECT AT SAGINAW BAY, MICHIGAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FEBRUARY 1 ^4/ PREPARED BY U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT DETROIT, MICHIGAN STATEMENT OF FINDINGS PROPOSED DREDGE DISPOSAL FACILITY SAGINAW BAY, MICHIGAN I have reviewed and evaluated, in light of the overall public interest, the documents concerning the proposed action as well as the stated views of other interested agencies and the concerned public relative to the proposed dredge disposal fa cility at Saginaw Bay, Michigan. BACKGROUND Construction of the proposed facility is authorized by the River and Har­ bor Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611, Section 123) which provides for the confined disposal of polluted materials resulting from maintenance dredg­ ing of Federal navigation projects. Additionally, in 1970, the Governor of Michigan requested that the Corps of Engineers cease returning polluted dredged materials to the waters of the Great Lakes in Michigan. As part of the planning process for the proposed fa cility, two workshops were con­ ducted at Bay City in March 1974. These meetings were attended by govern­ ment representatives, city representatives, environmental groups and the general public. The purpose of the meetings was to provide and exchange information relative to the alternatives being considered for siting the facility. As a result of information generated at the workshops and con­ tinued coordination with the State of Michiv,—., the Channel-Shelter Island location was selected. THE SELECTED PLAN -The proposed disposal site is located on the southeast side of the Federal navigation channel in Saginaw Bay, approximately two miles northeasterly from the mouth of the Saginaw River.
    [Show full text]
  • Remedial Action Plan
    Michigan Department of Natural Resources Remedial Action Plan for SAGINAW RIVER AND SAGINAW BAY Area of Concern September 1988 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Quality Division Great Lakes and Environmental 'Assessment Section P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, Michigan 48909 PREFACE This Saginaw RiverIBay Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was prepared by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) from a first draft compiled for MDNR by the East Central Michigan Planning and Development Region, the National Wildlife Federation, and graduate students from the University of Michigan. The Remedial Action Section was prepared by MDNR and a regional public organization known as the Saginaw Basin Natural Resources Steering Committee. Public and technical comment was received throughout the RAP development and review process as described in Section VI. The RAP summarizes existing water quality data on the Saginaw Bay drainage basin and outlines initial perceptions of the remedial actions that should be taken to further address the eutrophication and toxic material problems in the Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay. The remedial actions presented here will be further refined in future versions of the RAP, which it is anticipated, will be periodically updated and revised as more data are acquired, remedial measures are implemented, and environmental conditions improve. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS An extensive list of people and agencies contributed a great deal of time and effort to develop this plan. The complete list is too extensive to present
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load for Polychlorinated Biphenyls for the Kawkawlin River Bay County, Michigan
    Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Surface Water Quality Division August 2002 Total Maximum Daily Load for Polychlorinated Biphenyls for the Kawkawlin River Bay County, Michigan INTRODUCTION Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA’s) Water Quality Planning and Management Regulations (Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 130) require states to develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for waterbodies that are not meeting Water Quality Standards (WQS). The TMDL process establishes the allowable loadings of a pollutant to a waterbody based on the relationship between pollutant sources and in-stream water quality conditions. TMDLs provide states a basis for determining the pollutant reduction necessary from both point and/or nonpoint sources to maintain and/or restore the quality of their water resources. This TMDL follows a phased approach due to inherent uncertainties in deriving numeric targets and estimating loadings from nonpoint sources. Under the phased approach, load allocations (LAs) and waste load allocations (WLAs) are calculated using the best available data and information, recognizing the need for additional monitoring data to determine if the load reductions required by the TMDL result in WQS attainment. The phased approach provides for the implementation of the TMDL, while additional data are collected to reduce uncertainty. The purpose of this TMDL is to establish appropriate levels for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the Kawkawlin River that will result in WQS attainment. PROBLEM STATEMENT The TMDL reach of the Kawkawlin River, a warmwater designated waterbody, is located in Bay County and extends 5 miles upstream from the Saginaw Bay confluence (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Area Recreation Plan: 2009-2013
    Bay County Area Recreation Plan: 2009-2013 A multi-jurisdictional plan for City of Auburn Frankenlust Township Merritt Township Bay County Fraser Township Monitor Township Bangor Township Gibson Township City of Pinconning Beaver Township Hampton Township Portsmouth Township City of Essexville Kawkawlin Township Williams Township prepared by Bay County and Spicer Group Bay County Area Recreation Plan: 2009-2013 Bay County Board of Commissioners Richard L. Byrne Ernie Krygier Patrick H. Beson Kim Coonan Vaughn J. Begick Brian K. Elder Donald J. Tilley Eugene F. Gwizdala Dawn A. Klida Participating Communities City of Auburn Fraser Township Monitor Charter Township Bangor Charter Township Gibson Township City of Pinconning Beaver Township Hampton Charter Township Portsmouth Charter Township City of Essexville Kawkawlin Township Williams Charter Township Frankenlust Township Merritt Township For the Bay County Recreation Plan Thomas L. Hickner, Bay County Executive Michaiel K. Gray, Assistant County Executive for Recreation and Administrative Services Brent Goik, Recreation & Club House Supervisor Steve Humphrey, Pinconning Park Ranger Eliza Cortez, Administrative Secretary Rick Pabalis, Superintendent of Buildings & Grounds Prepared by: Bay County Department of Recreation & Administrative Services 515 Center Avenue Bay City, MI 48708 (989) 895-4130 www.baycounty-mi.gov With assistance by: The County of Bay will provide necessary and reasonable auxiliary aids and services, such as signers for the hearing Spicer Group, Inc. impaired or audio tapes of printed materials, to individuals 230 South Washington Avenue with disabilities; copies of the plan can be provided in alternative formats. Contact Michael K. Gray, ADA Saginaw, MI 48607 Coordinator, 515 Center Avenue, Suite 403, Bay City, MI (989) 754-4717 48708-5125 or call (989)895-4130 Voice, or (989) 895- www.spicergroup.com 4049 TDD/TTY hearing or speech impaired, or send e-mail to administrative [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS ARGUED: David E
    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Rapanos, et al. No. 03-1489 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0239P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0239p.06 _________________ COUNSEL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ARGUED: David E. Dearing, Indianapolis, Indiana, for FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Appellants. Katherine W. Hazard, UNITED STATES _________________ DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David E. Dearing, Indianapolis, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, X Indiana, for Appellants. Katherine W. Hazard, UNITED Plaintiff-Appellee, - STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., - for Appellee. - No. 03-1489 v. - _________________ > , OPINION JOHN A. RAPANOS; JUDITH A. - _________________ NELKIE RAPANOS; PRODO, - INC.; ROLLING MEADOWS - DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. Plaintiff-Appellee HUNT CLUB; PINE RIVER - United States brought suit against the Defendants pursuant to - the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of BLUFF ESTATES, INC., - Defendants-Appellants. 1972, Pub. L. No. 92-500, 86 Stat. 817, as amended 33 U.S.C. - § 1251 et seq., commonly known as the Clean Water Act N (“CWA”). Defendants-Appellants John Rapanos, Judith Appeal from the United States District Court Rapanos, Prodo, Inc., Rolling Meadows Hunt Club, and Pine for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. River Bluff Estates, Inc. appeal the district court’s entry of No. 94-70788—Bernard A. Friedman, Chief District Judge. judgment in favor of the United States. Prodo, Inc., Rolling Meadows Hunt Club, and Pine River Bluff Estates, Inc. are Argued: June 9, 2004 wholly owned by John and Judith Rapanos. For the reasons discussed below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district Decided and Filed: July 26, 2004 court.
    [Show full text]
  • State Board of Geological Survey of Michigan for the Year 1905
    REPORT 4. Horsebacks, sandstone channels and areas..........15 OF THE 5. Coal analyses, boiler tests. .....................................17 STATE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 6. Coal seams. Thickness of the coal formation. .......20 OF MICHIGAN 7. Bangor coal and rider..............................................21 FOR THE YEAR 1905 8. Lower coal and rider................................................21 9. Saginaw coal and Middle rider................................22 ALFRED C. LANE 10. Lower Verne..........................................................23 STATE GEOLOGIST 11. Thickness of the Lower Verne. .............................24 BY AUTHORITY 12. Character of the foot and roof of the Lower Verne.25 13. Lower Verne Rider. ...............................................25 LANSING, MICHIGAN WYNKOOP HALLENBECK CRAWFORD CO., STATE PRINTERS 14. Upper Verne Coal. ................................................25 1906 15. Thickness of the Upper Verne. .............................26 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON BAY COUNTY 16. Character of the foot and roof of the Upper Verne.27 BY 17. The Verne coals in Garfield and Mt. Forest W. F. COOPER townships. ....................................................................27 Michigan Geological Survey 18. The Upper Rider....................................................28 19. Thickness of the Upper rider.................................29 Published by the Board of Geological Survey, as part of the Annual Report for 1905, Pages 135-426. 20. Character of the foot and roof of the Upper rider..29
    [Show full text]
  • TARGETING ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION in the SAGINAW RIVER/BAY AREA of CONCERN (AOC) 2001 Remedial Action Plan Update July 2002
    TARGETING ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION IN THE SAGINAW RIVER/BAY AREA OF CONCERN (AOC) 2001 Remedial Action Plan Update July 2002 Prepared for The Great Lakes Commission On behalf of The Partnership for the Saginaw Bay Watershed Prepared by Public Sector Consultants, Inc. Lansing, Michigan www.pscinc.com TARGETING ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION IN THE SAGINAW RIVER/BAY AREA OF CONCERN (AOC) 2001 Remedial Action Plan Update July 2002 Prepared for The Great Lakes Commission On behalf of The Partnership for the Saginaw Bay Watershed Prepared by Public Sector Consultants, Inc. Lansing, Michigan www.pscinc.com Project Director Mark Coscarelli Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 The Saginaw Bay Watershed .......................................................................................... 3 Overview of Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 5 Measures of Success........................................................................................................ 6 Bay Ecosystem................................................................................................................. 15 Impairments................................................................................................................... 15 Evidence of Recovery................................................................................................... 17 Current Status ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Saginaw Bay Water Trails 2015 Readiness Plan
    Saginaw Bay Water Trails 2015 Readiness Plan Acknowledgements Funding Government Partners Financial assistance for this project was provided, in part, by the The Arenac County Board of Commissioners Arenac County Board of Commissioners, Arenac County Parks and Recreation Commission, Michigan Coastal Zone Management The Arenac County Drain Commissioner Program, Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), through a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration The Arenac County Road Commission (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce† The Arenac County Parks and Recreation Commission Arenac Township Au Gres Township And by the Bay Area Community Foundation The City of Au Gres City of Bay City Bay City Planning Commission Saginaw Bay Water Trail Steering Committee Bay County Board of Commissioners Greg Rankin, Past President, Friends of the Bay City State Recreation Area Bay County Parks & Recreation Department Bay County Road Commission Scott Reid, Tri-City Kayaking Group, Michigan Paddlers Safety Group Bay County Drain Commissioner Dan Dauer, Saginaw Valley State University/Osher Lifelong Learning Bay County Environmental Affairs and Community Institute/Kayaking Group Development Jim Janowicz, East Coast Paddlers Hampton Township Joe Skornia, East Coast Paddlers The City of Omer Frank Starkweather, President, Saginaw Bay Water Trail Alliance; City of Essexville President, Bay City Planning Commission Township of Monitor Gary Hadden, Treasurer, Saginaw Bay Water Trail Alliance Township of Kawkawlin Robert Luce, Arenac County
    [Show full text]