Mato Grosso , Brazil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Mato Grosso, Brazil Jurisdictional indicators brief State area: 903,378 km² (10.61% of Brazil) Original forest area: 520,033 km² Current forest area (2019): 314,770 km² (34.8% of Mato Grosso) Yearly deforestation (2019) 1,702 km² Yearly deforestation rate (2019) 0.54% Interannual deforestation change +14% (2018-2019) Accumulated deforestation (2001-2019): 69,082 km² Protected conservation areas: 40,464 km² (4.5% of Mato Grosso) Carbon stocks (2015): 3,095 millions tons (above ground biomass) Representative crops (2018): Soybean (31,608,562 tons); Maize (26,172,540 tons); Sugarcane (20,433,828 tons) Value of agricultural production (2016): $7,989,997,431 USD More on jurisdictional sustainability State of jurisdictional sustainability Index: Forest and people | Deforestation | Burned area | Emissions from deforestation | Livestock | Agriculture | Aquaculture Forest and people In 2019, the estimated area of tropical forest in the state of Mato Grosso was 314,770 km2, equivalent to 34.8% of the state’s total area, and to 9.9% of the tropical forest remaining in the nine states of the Brazilian legal Amazon. The total accumulated forest lost during the period 2001-2019 was 69,082 km2, equivalent to 17.6% of the forest area remaining in 2001. Mato Grosso concentrated about 8.3% of the carbon reserves stored in the biomass of the Brazilian tropical forest (about 3,095 mt C as of 2019). a DRAFTb 100% 34.8% of the state is covered with forest 80% 60% 9.9% of Brazilian tropical forest area 40% 34.8% 20% 8.3% of Brazilian tropical forest carbon stock 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2001 2019 No forest (%) Deforestation (%) Forest (%) Figure 1: a) forest share and b) transition of forest to deforestation over the last years There were 3.5 million people living in Mato Grosso as of 2020, distributed in 19 municipalities, with 0.6 million people living in the capital city of Cuiabá. The state has formally designated conservation areas and indigenous territories, which respectively represent 4% and 16% of the state. There were an estimated 43,226 indigenous people living in the state in 2010 (see Figure 2). http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-1 Report created July 15, 2020 Figure 2: Map of most populated places (> 40,000 people) and indigenous and protected areas in Mato Grosso Deforestation Mato Grosso reduced its yearly deforestation rate rapidly after the maximum of 2004 (11,814 km2). Deforestation decreased rapidly till 2012 when it reached 757 km2 and has remained more or less stable after 2015 with an average yearly deforestation of 1,568.6km2. The deforestation in the state of Mato Grosso in 2019 was 1,702 km2. While deforestation in the Brazilian legal Amazon in 2019 saw the largest interannual increase in the last decade (34%), the deforestation in Mato Grosso increased at a slower rate (14%). Mato Grosso continued having the second largest deforestation area among Brazilian states and concentrating 17% of the total deforestation in the legal Amazon in 2019. The deforestation rate in the state in 2019 was 0.54%, larger than the average of the legal Amazon states in 2019 (0.43%). The analysis of deforestation in Cerrado (2018), which represents 28% of the state area (see Figure 3). The state’s current deforestation is 78% belowDRAFT the reference baseline 1996-2005, and 64% below the reference baseline 1996-2015. 39% of the deforestation is located in the top 5 most affected municipalities in the state (see Figure 4). The municipality of Colniza have consistently registered the largest loss of tropical forest, reaching a maximum of 566 km2 in 2004. In 2019 the municipality of Colniza continued being the municipality with the largest yearly deforestation. http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-2 Report created July 15, 2020 15000 4,393 10,405 10000 value 6,963 5000 958 2,678 1,027 531 1,601 1,702 1,120 0 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1996 2019 Cerrado deforestation Amazon deforestation Average 3−year deforestation Deforestation baseline Figure 3: Yearly deforestation (푘푚2) and deforestation baseline a b 2020 198 2015 2010 Year 2005 DRAFT 566 2000 Sinop Juara Cláudia Apiacás Colniza Paranaíta Aripuanã União do Sul Marcelândia Nova Bandeirantes 2 2 Km Km 100 200 300 400 500 0 50 100 150 Figure 4: a) Yearly deforestation by municipalities in 2019 b) Yearly deforestation in top 10 most affected municipalities (푘푚2) http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-3 Report created July 15, 2020 Table 1: Forest and deforestation indicators in the state of Mato Grosso Year Forest (km2) Deforestation Deforestation rate (%) Annual variation (%) 2001 381,786 7,703 2.02 20.9 2002 374,638 7,892 2.11 2.5 2003 364,731 10,405 2.85 31.8 2004 353,926 11,814 3.34 13.5 2005 343,579 7,145 2.08 -39.5 2006 335,056 4,333 1.29 -39.4 2007 332,464 2,678 0.81 -38.2 2008 329,883 3,258 0.99 21.7 2009 326,434 1,049 0.32 -67.8 2010 325,605 871 0.27 -17 2011 324,824 1,120 0.35 28.6 2012 323,757 757 0.23 -32.4 2013 322,962 1,139 0.35 50.5 2014 321,856 1,075 0.33 -5.6 2015 320,751 1,601 0.50 48.9 2016 319,259 1,489 DRAFT0.47 -7 2017 317,876 1,561 0.49 4.8 2018 316,261 1,490 0.47 -4.5 2019 314,770 1,702 0.54 14.2 http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-4 Report created July 15, 2020 DRAFT http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-5 Report created July 15, 2020 Burned area According to the NASA-USGS analysis of MODIS satellite observations, the average yearly burned area in Mato Grosso was 38,623 km2 for the period 2010-2020. This figure includes burned areas due to firesin forest, savannahs and opened agricultural areas. The burned area in 2019 was 47,486 km2 and the worst year in the last decade was 2010 with 100,690 km2 burned. In most years, the months of September and August represented the peak of the fire season (see Figure 5). 12 1,975 506 204 553 291 988 281 183 428 542 11 1,253 1,447 830 1,857 606 2,278 887 829 354 1,272 10 8,528 1,232 2,519 2,456 6,075 6,180 3,460 4,037 941 2,619 9 48,275 12,085 18,136 8,595 8,771 15,275 10,906 28,907 9,101 20,584 8 25,478 4,551 11,813 6,031 9,402 6,902 11,766 7,268 4,036 12,047 7 6,380 1,064 1,791 1,347 1,982 1,658 4,457 1,953 1,173 2,326 Month 6 2,320 769 877 827 1,573 1,238 956 1,215 1,009 1,739 5 1,963 599 855 824 1,097 790 1,005 929 1,023 1,491 4 902 349 293 214 412 194 933 292 251 279 3 1,315 779 605 1,018 1,068 1,212 1,973 994 1,319 832 1,705 2 1,494 58 678 1,284 599 1,559 2,473 953 2,260 1,167 2,410 1 810 370 786 109 117 722 1,067 616 613 2,588 2,412 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Year 100,690 DRAFT 90,000 2 60,000 m 47,486 K 30,000 22,507 0 12 14 16 18 2010 2019 year Figure 5: Monthly burned area since 2010 (km2). Source: EII analysis of MODIS-MCD64 http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-6 Report created July 15, 2020 Emissions from deforestation The accumulated emissions from deforestation in the state of Mato Grosso between 2000 and 2019 amount to 3,235 million tons of CO2eq, which was equivalent to 25.1% of the total emissions from deforestation in the legal Amazon during this period. Considering the observed yearly deforestation, the mean carbon density of the state’s forest and the business as usual deforestation baseline, the accumulated gross avoided emissions from deforestation during the period from 2006 to 2019 was 3,018 million tons of CO2eq. This results from summing avoided emissions during the period from 2006 to 2019 in which the deforestation was lower than the business as usual deforestation baseline. a 456.92 b 323.15 300 400 223.68 300 200 200 127.89 100 Emissions CO2eq (Millions tons) 100 83.01 emissions CO2 (Millions tons) Avoided 43.36 34.32 0 0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 08 10 12 14 16 18 2000 2019 2006 2019 Figure 6: Emissions from deforestation (left) and avoided emissions (right) (CO2eq Millions tons) DRAFT http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-7 Report created July 15, 2020 Livestock Table 2: Livestock indicators in Mato Grosso Cattle Pig Poultry Fish Year 2018 2018 2018 2015 Herd size: 30,199,598 2,945,416 60,394,411 Slaughtered heads: 5,219,350 2,497,715 215,717,180 Meat production 1,393,786 224,400 522,938 (tons): Value (thousands): R$379,284 BRL 30 20 28.4 30.2 24.61 26.02 Heads (Millions) 10 0 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 2018 Yearly cattle herd size in the state of Mato Grosso (2000−2018) 1445.1 1393.8 6 1,500 DRAFT Meat production (thousand tons) 924.9 4 1,000 645.2 5.84 5.22 2 3.82 500 2.76 Slaughtered head (millions) 0 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 2000 2018 Yearly cattle meat output in terms of slaughtered heads and meat production (thousand tons) in the state of Mato Grosso (2000−2018) Meat production (thousand tons) Slaughtered head (millions) http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-8 Report created July 15, 2020 Agriculture Soybean 10,000 9,43831.61 8,614 30 26.28 7,500 6,107 5,831 17.96 20 5,000 15.28 3,121 9.53 10 2,500 0 0 Maize 10,000 Crop production (Millions tons) 30 26.17 7,500 20 5,000 15.34 4,417 3,331 8.18 10 2,500 6.13 1,663 1,044 1.74 536 0 0 Harvested area (Thousand hectares) Sugarcane 10,000 30 7,500 20.43 19.21 20 16.21 5,000 15.00 11.12 DRAFT 10 2,500 167 206 213 276 284 0 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 2000 2018 Crop production (Millions tons) Harvested area (Thousand hectares) Figure 7: Harvested area and production of the three crops most produced in Mato Grosso http://earthinnovation.org BR-MT-9 Report created July 15, 2020 Aquaculture The plot shows the aquaculture production in the state of Mato Grosso over the last 6 years and the value of this production.
Recommended publications
  • Modelagem Do Desmatamento No Município De Colniza – MT

    Modelagem Do Desmatamento No Município De Colniza – MT

    Modelagem do desmatamento no município de Colniza – MT Daniel Assumpção Costa Ferreira 1, 2 Arnaldo Carneiro Filho 2 1Sistema de Proteção da Amazônia Divisão de Monitoramento Territorial – DTER Avenida do Turismo, 1350 Tarumã, CEP- 69049-630 - Manaus – AM, [email protected] 2Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA Laboratório de Sistemas de Informação Geográfica - SIGLAB Caixa Postal 478 - 69011-870 - Manaus - AM, Brasil (asumpcao,[email protected]) Abstract. Approximately 700.000 km2, or 17% of the Brazilian part of the Amazon, has been already deforested by 2005. Most of this deforestation is concentrated at the “deforestation arc ”, region that comprised the southern and southwestern of the state of Pará, the northen part of the state of Mato-Grosso and the central part of the state of Rondônia. Among these states, Mato Grosso deserves special attention, because over the last 10 years this state was responsible for at least 35% of the deforestation registred by INPE - Brasil. Considering the facts above, the aim of this study was to predict the spatial configuration of the residual forest, until the year 2020, in a Mato Grosso county called Colniza. Using a model based on cellular automata we simulated 3 distinct scenarios: (1) Business as usual – based on the annual deforestation rate reported for the period 2000 - 2004, (2) intermediary – based on the deforestation rate reported for 2004-2005, when the deforestation rate decreased by approximately 50%, (3) optimistic – based on the Brazilian Forest Code . The projections made for Colniza show that of the 90% forest cover in 2004, deforestation at the present rate will reduce this amount to approximately 70% in 2020.
  • Report 12 May 2020

    Report 12 May 2020

    Report 12 May 2020 1 Executive Summary This Rapid Response report highlights 10 cases of deforestation within 4 municipalities in Amazon biome and 5 municipalities in Cerrado biome. Four of the selected cases are in the Amazon biome and six are in the Cerrado biome. The 10 cases of land clearing presented in this report were based on alerts data from DETER (System for Monitoring Deforestation on Real Time) and PRODES (Program for Deforestation Calculation) observed between February 26, 2020 and March 23, 2020. Land clearing alerts considered in this report were visually confirmed. Cases and clearance (ha) per municipality 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 São Félix do Xingu (Pará) 1 União do Sul (Mato Grosso) 1 Colniza (Mato Grosso) 1 Santa Carmem (Mato Grosso) 1 Comodoro (Mato Grosso) 1 Currais (Piauí) 1 Novo Jardim (Tocantins) 1 São Félix de Balsas (Maranhão) 1 Formosa do Rio Preto (Bahia) 2 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Cerrado (3,362 ha) Amazon (3,370 ha) Rapid Response: Soy & Cattle - Report 12 - May 2020 (based on alerts from March 2020) 2 Table of Contents Amazon biome 1. Fazenda Tiborna (São Félix do Xingu, Pará) 4 2. Fazenda Floresta Ramada I, II, III, IV and V - Fazenda Califórnia (União do Sul, Mato Grosso) 6 3. Fazenda Araguaia - Gleba Escol Norte (Colniza, Mato Grosso) 9 4. Fazenda Sumatra - Mat 1424, I, II and III (Santa Carmem, Mato Grosso) 14 Cerrado biome 5. Fazenda Oeste (Comodoro, Mato Grosso) 17 6. Fazenda Nossa Senhora Aparecida (Currais, Piauí) 14 7. Fazenda Morro Branco (Novo Jardim, Tocantins) 20 8.
  • Divisão Territorial De Cuiabá

    Divisão Territorial De Cuiabá

    WILSON PEREIRA DOS SANTOS Prefeito Municipal de Cuiabá JACY RIBEIRO DE PROENÇA Vice Prefeita Municipal ANDELSON GIL DO AMARAL PEDRO PINTO DE OLIVEIRA ÉDEN CAPISTRANO PINTO JOÃO DE SOUZA VIEIRA FILHO Secretário Municipal de Governo Secretário Municipal de Secretário Municipal de Meio Secretário Municipal de Trabalho, Comunicação Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Urbano Desenv. Econômico e Turismo. JOSÉ ANTÔNIO ROSA GUILHERME FREDERICO MÜLLER OSCAR SOARES MARTINS ADRIANA BUSSIKI SANTOS Procurador Geral do Município Secretário Municipal de Secretário Municipal de Trânsito e Presidente do Instituto de Pesquisa Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Transporte Urbano e Desenvolvimento Urbano MÁRIO OLÍMPIO MEDEIROS FILHO GUILHERME ANTÔNIO MALUF PEDRO LUIZ SHINOHARA JÚLIO CÉSAR PINHEIRO Secretário Municipal de Cultura Secretária Municipal de Saúde Secretário Municipal de Esporte e Presidente da Agência Municipal de Cidadania Habitação Popular CELCITA ROSA PINHEIRO DA SILVA JOSÉ CARLOS CARVALHO SOUZA EDUARDO ALEXANDRE RICCI RONALDO ROSA TAVEIRA Secretário Municipal de Assistência Secretário Municipal de Finanças Ouvidor Geral do Município de Presidente do Instituto de Prev. Social e Desenvolvimento Humano Cuiabá/Ombudsman Social dos Serv. de Cuiabá JOSÉ EUCLIDES DOS SANTOS FILHO CARLOS CARLÃO P. DO NASCIMENTO LUIZ MÁRIO DE BARROS JOSÉ ANTÔNIO ROSA Secretário Municipal de Infra- Secretário Municipal de Educação Auditoria e Controle Interno Diretor Presidente da Agência Estrutura Municipal de Saneamento PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE CUIABÁ INSTITUTO DE PLANEJAMENTO E DESENVOLVIMENTO URBANO DIRETORIA DE PESQUISA E INFORMAÇÃO ORGANIZAÇÃO GEOPOLÍTICA DE CUIABÁ • LIMITES MUNICIPAIS • LIMITES DOS DISTRITOS • LIMITE DO PERÍMETRO URBANO • ADMINISTRAÇÕES REGIONAIS • ABAIRRAMENTO Cuiabá, agosto de 2007. 2007. Prefeitura Municipal de Cuiabá/IPDU Ficha catalográfica CUIABÁ. Prefeitura Municipal de Cuiabá / Organização Geopolítica de Cuiabá.
  • Evolution of Land Use in the Brazilian Amazon: from Frontier Expansion to Market Chain Dynamics

    Evolution of Land Use in the Brazilian Amazon: from Frontier Expansion to Market Chain Dynamics

    Land 2014, 3, 981-1014; doi:10.3390/land3030981 OPEN ACCESS land ISSN 2073-445X www.mdpi.com/journal/land/ Article Evolution of Land Use in the Brazilian Amazon: From Frontier Expansion to Market Chain Dynamics Luciana S. Soler 1,2,*, Peter H. Verburg 3 and Diógenes S. Alves 4 1 Land Dynamics Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands 2 National Early Warning and Monitoring Centre of Natural Disasters (Cemaden), Parque Tecnológico, Av. Dr. Altino Bondensan 500, São José dos Campos 12247, Brazil 3 Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Image Processing Division, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Av. dos Astronautas 1758, São José dos Campos 12227, Brazil; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-12-3186-9236. Received: 31 December 2013; in revised form: 30 July 2014 / Accepted: 7 August 2014 / Published: 19 August 2014 Abstract: Agricultural census data and fieldwork observations are used to analyze changes in land cover/use intensity across Rondônia and Mato Grosso states along the agricultural frontier in the Brazilian Amazon. Results show that the development of land use is strongly related to land distribution structure. While large farms have increased their share of annual and perennial crops, small and medium size farms have strongly contributed to the development of beef and milk market chains in both Rondônia and Mato Grosso. Land use intensification has occurred in the form of increased use of machinery, labor in agriculture and stocking rates of cattle herds.
  • Resultado: Redes E Computação Distribuída

    Resultado: Redes E Computação Distribuída

    SERVIÇO PÚBLICO FEDERAL MEC – SETEC INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE EDUCAÇÃO, CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA DE MATO GROSSO. PRÓ-REITORIA DE ENSINO. DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCAÇÃO A DISTÂNCIA Os candidatos aprovados e excedentes deverão comparecer aos s para os quais efetuaram a inscrição para confirmar o interesse na matrícula das datas de 25 a 28 de abril de 2017, munidos da certidão de Nascimento ou casamento, em original e cópia ou cópia autenticada para juntar aos demais documentos apresentados. Os candidatos que não apresentaram os documentos autenticados deverão entregar na matricula. Para recorrer deve-se entrar no Edital, preencher o Anexo III e enviá-lo para o e-mail: coord- [email protected] Especialização em Redes de Computação Distribuída Lista dos Aprovados - Edital 005/2017 Nome do Candidato Polo Pontos Resultado Elton Ricelli Ferreira de Rezende Alto Araguaia 72,5 Aprov. Weber Candido Flores Alto Araguaia 40,5 Aprov. Nayara Laise Ribeiro Mota Alto Araguaia 40 Aprov. Claudio Lopes Colares Alto Araguaia 40 Aprov. Julio Cesar Campos Morais Alto Araguaia 35 Aprov. Marciane Verissimo Alto Araguaia 27,5 Aprov. Taiz Meame Alexandre Alto Araguaia 20 Aprov. Franco Dave Souza da Silva Alto Araguaia 15 Aprov. Daniel Henrique Petrikicz Alto Araguaia 70 Aprov.. Jussan Fernandes da Silva Alto Araguaia 12,5 Aprov. Aprov. Dailce Maisa Alves Pereira Barra do Bugres 65,5 Aprov. Willyan Alves da Silva Barra do Bugres 62 Aprov. Mauricio Rosenil Alves dos Santos Barra do Bugres 55 Aprov. Ana Carolina Silva Linck Barra do Bugres 55 Aprov. Cleber José de Almeida Barra do Bugres 50 SERVIÇO PÚBLICO FEDERAL MEC – SETEC INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE EDUCAÇÃO, CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA DE MATO GROSSO.
  • Yellow Fever Epidemiological Update

    Yellow Fever Epidemiological Update

    Epidemiological Update Yellow Fever 10 July 2017 Situation summary in the Americas From epidemiological week (EW) 1 to EW 26 of 2017, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, the Plurinational State of Bolivia, and Suriname have reported suspected and confirmed yellow fever cases. The following is an update on the situation in Brazil, the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru. No changes in the number of reported cases have been reported in the other countries. In Brazil, since the beginning of the outbreak in December 2016 up to 31 May 2017, there were 3,240 suspected cases of yellow fever reported (792 confirmed, 1,929 discarded, and 519 under investigation), including 435 deaths (274 confirmed, 124 discarded, and 37 under investigation). The case fatality rate (CFR) among confirmed cases is 35%. According to the probable site of infection,1 suspected cases correspond to 407 municipalities, while the confirmed cases were distributed among 130 municipalities in 8 states (Espírito Santo, Goiás, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, Pará, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Tocantins) and the Federal District. With regard to the confirmed fatal cases and their probable site of infection, one corresponds to the Federal District, 85 to Espírito Santo, one to Goiás, one to Matto Grosso, 165 to Minas Gerais, four to Pará, 7 to Rio de Janeiro, and 10 to São Paulo. In the states with more than 5 confirmed deaths, the CFR among confirmed cases is 50% in São Paulo, 41% in Rio de Janeiro, 34% in Minas Gerais, and 33% in Espírito Santo. No cases were confirmed in new municipalities in Espírito Santo (ES), Minas Gerais (MG), São Paulo (SP), and Rio de Janeiro (RJ) in the last month.
  • Convergent Agrarian Frontiers in the Settlement of Mato Grosso, Brazil

    Convergent Agrarian Frontiers in the Settlement of Mato Grosso, Brazil

    Convergent Agrarian Frontiers in the Settlement of Mato Grosso, Brazil Lisa Rausch University of Wisconsin-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies Abstract: The heterogeneity of development in the contemporary southern Amazon may be linked to different settlement experiences on the frontier. Three main types of productive settlement have been identified, including official colonization, private colonization, and spontaneous settlement, based on the differentiated motivations and resources of participants in these settlements. Not only did these different types of frontiers advance concurrently in the Amazon, but these frontiers sometimes converged in one location. The interaction of settlers from different groups sometimes created conflict, but also advanced the process of territorialization of the Amazon. This position is illustrated via a case study of one municipality at which three groups of settlers converged. Ultimately, though local popular history privileges the role of one of the three groups in bringing about the founding of the municipality and the development of a successful local economy, these achievements were only possible due to the different resources that each group brought to the settlement. Introduction he heterogeneity of the Brazilian Amazon frontier experience is just beginning to be understood. Early researchers set out structuralist expectations of accelerating resource Texploitation, capital accumulation by a relative few as land holdings were systematically consolidated, and the enlistment of the peasantry into wage labor as the agricultural frontier advanced into the Amazon.1 A linear progression toward the homogenization of Amazonian places has not occurred, however, even as highly capitalized industrial agriculture has continued to advance in the region.2 Today, the Amazon is a tapestry of highly globalized and globalizing cities, relic frontier towns, marginal extractive landscapes, and panoramas of modern, industrial- scale agricultural production with a range of landholding sizes.
  • West Nile Virus in the State of Ceará, Northeast Brazil

    West Nile Virus in the State of Ceará, Northeast Brazil

    microorganisms Article West Nile Virus in the State of Ceará, Northeast Brazil Flávia Löwen Levy Chalhoub 1, Eudson Maia de Queiroz-Júnior 2 , Bruna Holanda Duarte 3, Marcos Eielson Pinheiro de Sá 4, Pedro Cerqueira Lima 5, Ailton Carneiro de Oliveira 6, Lívia Medeiros Neves Casseb 7, Liliane Leal das Chagas 7, Hamilton Antônio de Oliveira Monteiro 7, Maycon Sebastião Alberto Santos Neves 8, Cyro Facundo Chaves 9, Paulo Jean da Silva Moura 10, Aline Machado Rapello do Nascimento 11, Rodrigo Giesbrecht Pinheiro 11, Antonio Roberio Soares Vieira 3, Francisco Bergson Pinheiro Moura 3 , Luiz Osvaldo Rodrigues da Silva 3, Kiliana Nogueira Farias da Escóssia 3, Lindenberg Caranha de Sousa 3, Izabel Leticia Cavalcante Ramalho 12, Antônio Williams Lopes da Silva 2, Leda Maria Simoes¯ Mello 12,Fábio Felix de Souza 10, Francisco das Chagas Almeida 10, Raí dos Santos Rodrigues 10, Diego do Vale Chagas 10, Anielly Ferreira-de-Brito 8, Karina Ribeiro Leite Jardim Cavalcante 13, Maria Angélica Monteiro de Mello Mares-Guia 1, Vinícius Martins Guerra Campos 1, Nieli Rodrigues da Costa Faria 1, Marcelo Adriano da Cunha e Silva Vieira 11,14 , Marcos Cesar Lima de Mendonça 1, Nayara Camila Amorim de Alvarenga Pivisan 3, Jarier de Oliveira Moreno 2, Maria Aldessandra Diniz Vieira 10, Ricristhi Gonçalves de Aguiar Gomes 3, Fernanda Montenegro de Carvalho Araújo 12, Pedro Henrique de Oliveira Passos 11, Daniel Garkauskas Ramos 11, Alessandro Pecego Martins Romano 11 , Lívia Carício Martins 7, Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira 8 , Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis 1 and
  • Mato Grosso , 27 De Dezembro De 2011 • Jornal Oficial Eletrônico Dos Municípios Do Estado De Mato Grosso • ANO VI | Nº 1372

    Mato Grosso , 27 De Dezembro De 2011 • Jornal Oficial Eletrônico Dos Municípios Do Estado De Mato Grosso • ANO VI | Nº 1372

    Mato Grosso , 27 de Dezembro de 2011 • Jornal Oficial Eletrônico dos Municípios do Estado de Mato Grosso • ANO VI | Nº 1372 ESTADO DE MATO GROSSO Contratante: CIDESAT do “COMPLEXO NASCENTES DO CONSÓRCIO INTERMUNICIPAL "COMPLEXO PANTANAL”. Contratada: ROSANGELA CABRAL ROSA NASCENTES DO PANTANAL LAZARIN, CPF: 383.456.841-49. Objeto: Prestação de serviços de técnicos de Consultoria do projeto Fortalecimento das Políticas de Turismo para a Região Sudoeste do Estado de Mato Grosso e PRESIDÊNCIA trabalhos técnicos. Valor do Contrato R$ 6.720,00. Vencimento EXTRATO CONTRATO Nº 06/2011 31/12/2011. São José dos Quatro Marcos, 01 de dezembro de 2011. Contratante: CIDESAT do “COMPLEXO NASCENTES DO NIVALDO PONCIANO COELHO PANTANAL”. Contratado: ANTONIO CARLOS DE JESUS Presidente MENDES, CPF: 886.839.901-68. Objeto: Prestação de serviços Publicado por: técnicos na Administração do projeto Fortalecimento das Políticas de Noides Cenio da Silva Turismo para a Região Sudoeste do Estado de Mato Grosso e Código Identificador: DDE01646 trabalhos técnicos. Valor do Contrato R$ 6.720,00. Vencimento 31/12/2011. São José dos Quatro Marcos, 01 de dezembro de 2011. ESTADO DE MATO GROSSO NIVALDO PONCIANO COELHO PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE ALTO PARAGUAI Presidente PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL Publicado por: PROCESSO ADMINISTRATIVO Nº: 135/2011 Noides Cenio da Silva Código Identificador: DA420445 PARECER JURÍDICO PRESIDÊNCIA Vieram-me os autos administrativos de solicitação de parecer jurídico EXTRATO CONTRATO Nº 07/2011 quanto à posicionamento da Prefeitura Municipal, frente à Decisão Judicial proferida originariamente pelo Tribunal de Justiça nos autos de Protocolo 126566/2011 que entendeu ilegal a greve em curso dos profissionais da educação de Alto Paraguai.
  • Processo Nº 39810/2019 Interessado Prefeitura Municipal De Nobres Responsável Leocir Hanel Assunto Monitoramento Relator Conselheiro Luiz Henrique Lima

    Processo Nº 39810/2019 Interessado Prefeitura Municipal De Nobres Responsável Leocir Hanel Assunto Monitoramento Relator Conselheiro Luiz Henrique Lima

    PROCESSO Nº 39810/2019 INTERESSADO PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE NOBRES RESPONSÁVEL LEOCIR HANEL ASSUNTO MONITORAMENTO RELATOR CONSELHEIRO LUIZ HENRIQUE LIMA II. RAZÕES DO VOTO 8. No caso sob análise, verifica-se que estão presentes os requisitos de admissibilidade, de acordo com o artigo 44 da Lei Complementar n° 269/2007 e artigos 89, II e 148, V, § 6º do Regimento Interno do TCE/MT, motivo pelo qual conheço do presente monitoramento. 9. Conforme relatado, trata-se da análise do cumprimento das determinações constantes no Acórdão nº 485/2018 – TP – Processo nº 275824/2018, acerca do levantamento para conhecimento da situação de 116 (cento e dezesseis) Municípios Mato- grossenses, quanto ao lançamento, registro e cobrança do Imposto Predial Territorial Urbano – IPTU, assim como a instituição, revisão e atualização da Planta Genérica de Valores. 10. Referente ao Município de Nobres, nos autos do processo de Levantamento foram expedidas as seguintes determinações: Acórdão nº 485/2018 – TP: ... IV) DETERMINAR às atuais gestões dos Municípios de: Alto da Boa Vista, Alto Garças, Alto Taquari, Castanheira, Curvelândia, Indiavaí, Jaciara, Juara, Mirassol D'Oeste, Nobres, Nor- telândia, Nossa Senhora do Livramento, Nova Maringá, Planalto da Serra, Pontal do Araguaia, Ponte Branca, Porto dos Gaúchos, Porto Estrela, Rondonópolis, Santa Cruz do Xingu, São Félix do Araguaia, São José do Xingu, São José dos Quatro Marcos, Tabaporã, União do Sul e Várzea Grande que revisem a Planta Genérica de Valores até o dia 31-5-2020, conside- rando a Portaria do Ministério das Cidades nº 511, de 7 de dezembro de 2009, nos termos dos §§ 2º a 5º do artigo 30; ..
  • Jornal Oficial Eletrônico Dos Municípios Do Estado De Mato Grosso • ANO XI | N° 2.554 JORNAL OFICIAL Eletrônico Dos Municípios Do Estado De Mato Grosso

    Jornal Oficial Eletrônico Dos Municípios Do Estado De Mato Grosso • ANO XI | N° 2.554 JORNAL OFICIAL Eletrônico Dos Municípios Do Estado De Mato Grosso

    1 de Setembro de 2016 • Jornal Oficial Eletrônico dos Municípios do Estado de Mato Grosso • ANO XI | N° 2.554 JORNAL OFICIAL Eletrônico dos Municípios do Estado de Mato Grosso Índice Consórcio Intermunicipal de Saúde do Médio Araguaia ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Prefeitura Municipal de Água Boa ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Prefeitura Municipal de Alto Garças ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Prefeitura Municipal de Alto Paraguai ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Prefeitura Municipal de Alto Taquari ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Prefeitura Municipal de Apiacás ............................................................................................................................................................................ 16 Prefeitura Municipal de Araguaiana .....................................................................................................................................................................
  • Mapa De Atuação Da UNEMAT No Estado. Arquivo

    Mapa De Atuação Da UNEMAT No Estado. Arquivo

    UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DE MATO GROSSO UNUniversidEade do EMstado de MatoA Grosso T 11.3 11.2 10.8 10.2 5.9 11.4 5.10 10.7 11.5 10.6 11.6 10.3 ALTA FLORESTA 5.6 5.7 2.12 2.13 COLIDER 10.4 5.5 10.5 5.8 JUARA 10.9 10.10 10.11 5.4 LUCIARA 9.10 6.2 9.2 9.4 8.10 SINOP 5.2 9.12 5.3 6.3 6.4 9.5 5.11 9.13 9.3 4.9 5.13 8.4 9.8 5.12 9.6 4.10 9.7 4.13 9.14 8.7 9.9 2.9 2.4 9.11 4.5 8.8 8.6 9.15 4.4 2.11 8.2 7.11 2.8 8.9 7.4 TANGARÁ 8.5 4.3 7.6 7.5 NOVA 7.2 4.7 DA SERRA 7.10 8.3 4.8 XAVANTINA 2.3 7.8 4.2 1.5 1.4 7.12 4.11 1.6 2.5 2.7 1.9 1.3 BARRA DO 7.10 PONTES E 1.8 4.6 2.6 1.2 BUGRES 1.15 LACERDA 1.7 7.3 2.10 1.10 1.14 2.2 1.11 1.12 4.12 1.13 3.5 CÁCERES 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.7 ALTO 3.4 ARAGUAIA ·Campus Universitário de Cáceres ·Campus Universitário de P. e Lacerda ·Campus Universitário de Alto Araguaia ·Campus Universitário de N.