Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase/D5-D4 Isomerase in Human Skin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al
US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig. -
Genome-Wide Identification of Brain Mirnas in Response to High
Zhao et al. BMC Molecular Biol (2019) 20:3 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12867-019-0120-4 BMC Molecular Biology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Genome‑wide identifcation of brain miRNAs in response to high‑intensity intermittent swimming training in Rattus norvegicus by deep sequencing Yanhong Zhao1*†, Anmin Zhang2,3*†, Yanfang Wang4, Shuping Hu3, Ruiping Zhang2 and Shuaiwei Qian2 Abstract Background: Physical exercise can improve brain function by altering brain gene expression. The expression mecha- nisms underlying the brain’s response to exercise still remain unknown. miRNAs as vital regulators of gene expres- sion may be involved in regulation of brain genes in response to exercise. However, as yet, very little is known about exercise-responsive miRNAs in brain. Results: We constructed two comparative small RNA libraries of rat brain from a high-intensity intermittent swim- ming training (HIST) group and a normal control (NC) group. Using deep sequencing and bioinformatics analysis, we identifed 2109 (1700 from HIST, 1691 from NC) known and 55 (50 from HIST, 28 from NC) novel candidate miRNAs. Among them, 34 miRNAs were identifed as signifcantly diferentially expressed in response to HIST, 16 were up- regulated and 18 were down-regulated. The results showed that all members of mir-200 family were strongly up- regulated, implying mir-200 family may play very important roles in HIST response mechanisms of rat brain. A total of 955 potential target genes of these 34 exercise-responsive miRNAs were identifed from rat genes. Most of them are directly involved in the development and regulatory function of brain or nerve. -
Growth Cone Responses to Growth and Chemotropic Factors
European Journal of Neuroscience European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 28, pp. 268–278, 2008 doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06327.x Growth cone responses to growth and chemotropic factors Staci D. Sanford,1 Jesse C. Gatlin,1,* Tomas Ho¨kfelt2 and Karl H. Pfenninger1 1Departments of Pediatrics, and of Cell and Developmental Biology, and Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA 2Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Keywords: attractants, axonal pathfinding, growth cone, growth promotion, neuropeptides, repellents Abstract During nervous system development axons reach their target areas under the influence of numerous guidance cues that affect rate and direction of growth. This report addresses the unsettled question of whether and to what extent growth velocity and turning responses (attraction, repulsion) are interdependent. We exposed individual growth cones of fetal rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in culture asymmetrically to gradients of seven different factors and recorded their growth rates and turning angles. Growth cones exhibited divergent patterns of turning and growth responses. For example, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and thrombin all promoted growth, but HGF was a powerful attractant, thrombin a potent repellent and IGF-1 did not elicit turning. Galanin and neuropeptide Y also affected growth and ⁄ or turning differentially. Finally, nerve growth factor in the culture -
Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDUM 185106-16-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 -
Permeability Due to Drug Binding Kinetics and Reactivation Among
Differential Risk of Tuberculosis Reactivation among Anti-TNF Therapies Is Due to Drug Binding Kinetics and Permeability This information is current as of September 26, 2021. Mohammad Fallahi-Sichani, JoAnne L. Flynn, Jennifer J. Linderman and Denise E. Kirschner J Immunol 2012; 188:3169-3178; Prepublished online 29 February 2012; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103298 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/188/7/3169 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2012/02/29/jimmunol.110329 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Material 8.DC1 References This article cites 59 articles, 21 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/188/7/3169.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 26, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Differential Risk of Tuberculosis Reactivation among Anti-TNF Therapies Is Due to Drug Binding Kinetics and Permeability Mohammad Fallahi-Sichani,*,1 JoAnne L. -
REVIEW Estrogens and Atherosclerosis
R13 REVIEW Estrogens and atherosclerosis: insights from animal models and cell systems Jerzy-Roch Nofer1,2 1Center for Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Mu¨nster, Albert Schweizer Campus 1, Geba¨ude A1, 48129 Mu¨nster, Germany 2Department of Medicine, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Geriatrics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Correspondence should be addressed to J-R Nofer at Center for Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Mu¨nster; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Estrogens not only play a pivotal role in sexual development but are also involved in several physiological processes in various tissues including vasculature. While several epidemiological studies documented an inverse relationship between plasma estrogen levels and the incidence of cardiovascular disease and related it to the inhibition of atherosclerosis, an interventional trial showed an increase in cardiovascular events among postmenopausal women on estrogen treatment. The development of atherosclerotic lesions involves complex interplay between various pro- or anti-atherogenic processes that can be effectively studied only in vivo in appropriate animal models. With the advent of genetic engineering, transgenic mouse models of atherosclerosis have supplemented classical dietary cholesterol- induced disease models such as the cholesterol-fed rabbit. In the last two decades, these models were widely applied along with in vitro cell systems to specifically investigate the influence of estrogens on the development of early and advanced atherosclerotic lesions. The present review summarizes the results of these studies and assesses their contribution toward better understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying anti- and/or pro-atherogenic effects of estrogens in humans. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2012) 48, R13–R29 Introduction circumstances, these hormones promote the develop- ment of atherosclerosis. -
Network-Based Characterization of Drug-Protein Interaction Signatures
Tabei et al. BMC Systems Biology 2019, 13(Suppl 2):39 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-019-0691-1 RESEARCH Open Access Network-based characterization of drug-protein interaction signatures with a space-efficient approach Yasuo Tabei1*, Masaaki Kotera2, Ryusuke Sawada3 and Yoshihiro Yamanishi3,4 From The 17th Asia Pacific Bioinformatics Conference (APBC 2019) Wuhan, China. 14–16 January 2019 Abstract Background: Characterization of drug-protein interaction networks with biological features has recently become challenging in recent pharmaceutical science toward a better understanding of polypharmacology. Results: We present a novel method for systematic analyses of the underlying features characteristic of drug-protein interaction networks, which we call “drug-protein interaction signatures” from the integration of large-scale heterogeneous data of drugs and proteins. We develop a new efficient algorithm for extracting informative drug- protein interaction signatures from the integration of large-scale heterogeneous data of drugs and proteins, which is made possible by space-efficient representations for fingerprints of drug-protein pairs and sparsity-induced classifiers. Conclusions: Our method infers a set of drug-protein interaction signatures consisting of the associations between drug chemical substructures, adverse drug reactions, protein domains, biological pathways, and pathway modules. We argue the these signatures are biologically meaningful and useful for predicting unknown drug-protein interactions and are expected to contribute to rational drug design. Keywords: Drug-protein interaction prediction, Drug discovery, Large-scale prediction Background similar drugs are expected to interact with similar pro- Target proteins of drug molecules are classified into a pri- teins, with which the similarity of drugs and proteins are mary target and off-targets. -
C:\Myfiles\Linda's Work\Houchens\WA 2-6
1 2 This page intentionally left blank. 3 4 Draft Steroidogenesis DRP 110 May 2002 1 6.0 DEVELOPMENTAL STATUS OF THE ASSAY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2 FOR PREVALIDATION STUDIES 3 4 6.1 Current Status 5 6 The endpoint included in the sectioned testes assay has been evaluated in other studies. 7 However, the protocol itself has not been validated. Pending a final decision on the study 8 design, the protocol would be ready to enter the prevalidation phase. 9 10 6.2 Recommendation for Optimization of the Sectioned Testis Assay Protocol 11 12 6.2.1 Testicular Preparation Issues 13 14 Optimization of the assay could be determined for the amount of testis actually needed to 15 obtain a given level of sensitivity. For example, a single testis from an adult SD rat weighs 16 approximately 1 g. If such a testis were quarter sectioned, then each section would weigh 17 approximately 250 mg, which is the weight of the sample generally described by investigators 18 who have used quartered sections of testis. However, no documentation was found that 19 demonstrates whether smaller sections would give similar results. Thus, it would be 20 advantageous to conduct a study that investigates whether the sensitivity of the preparation is 21 affected by the amount of testicular tissue used and, if so, if there is an optimal and/or threshold 22 amount to use. The weight of the sections to be tested could range from the customary amount 23 used, i.e., 250 mg, down to an amount of tissue that represents a practical minimum, e.g., 5 to 24 10 mg. -
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0 -
Guidelines for Pharmacists Performing Clinical Interventions
Guidelines for pharmacists performing clinical interventions PSA Committed to better health © Pharmaceutical Society of Australia Ltd. 2018 This publication contains material that has been provided by the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (PSA), and may contain material provided by the Commonwealth and third parties. Copyright in material provided by the Commonwealth or third parties belong to them. PSA owns the copyright in the publication as a whole and all material in the publication that has been developed by PSA. In relation to PSA owned material, no part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwth), or the written permission of PSA. Requests and inquiries regarding permission to use PSA material should be addressed to: Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, PO Box 42, Deakin West ACT 2600. If you would like to use material that has been provided by the Commonwealth or third parties, contact them directly. Disclaimer Neither the PSA, nor any person associated with the preparation of this document, accepts liability for any loss which a user of this document may suffer as a result of reliance on the document and, in particular, for: • use of the Guidelines for a purpose for which they were not intended • any errors or omissions in the Guidelines • any inaccuracy in the information or data on which the Guidelines are based or which is contained in them • any interpretations or opinions stated in, or which may be inferred from, the Guidelines. Notification of any inaccuracy or ambiguity found in this document should be made without delay in order that the issue may be investigated and appropriate action taken. -
Plasma Steroid-Binding Proteins: Primary Gatekeepers of Steroid Hormone Action
230 1 G L HAMMOND Steroid bioavailability 230:1 R13–R25 Review Open Access Plasma steroid-binding proteins: primary gatekeepers of steroid hormone action Correspondence Geoffrey L Hammond should be addressed Departments of Cellular & Physiological Sciences and Obstetrics & Gynaecology, to G L Hammond University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Email [email protected] Abstract Biologically active steroids are transported in the blood by albumin, sex hormone- Key Words binding globulin (SHBG), and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG). These plasma f albumin proteins also regulate the non-protein-bound or ‘free’ fractions of circulating f sex hormone-binding globulin steroid hormones that are considered to be biologically active; as such, they can be f corticosteroid-binding viewed as the ‘primary gatekeepers of steroid action’. Albumin binds steroids with globulin limited specificity and low affinity, but its high concentration in blood buffers major f testosterone fluctuations in steroid concentrations and their free fractions. By contrast, SHBG and f estradiol Endocrinology CBG play much more dynamic roles in controlling steroid access to target tissues and f glucocorticoids of cells. They bind steroids with high (~nM) affinity and specificity, with SHBG binding f progesterone androgens and estrogens and CBG binding glucocorticoids and progesterone. Both are f serine protease inhibitor Journal glycoproteins that are structurally unrelated, and they function in different ways that extend beyond their transportation or buffering functions in the blood. Plasma SHBG and CBG production by the liver varies during development and different physiological or pathophysiological conditions, and abnormalities in the plasma levels of SHBG and CBG or their abilities to bind steroids are associated with a variety of pathologies. -
Theranostics R13 Preserves Motor Performance in SOD1G93A Mice By
Theranostics 2021, Vol. 11, Issue 15 7294 Ivyspring International Publisher Theranostics 2021; 11(15): 7294-7307. doi: 10.7150/thno.56070 Research Paper R13 preserves motor performance in SOD1G93A mice by improving mitochondrial function Xiao Li1,2#, Chongyang Chen2#, Xu Zhan2#, Binyao Li3, Zaijun Zhang4, Shupeng Li5, Yongmei Xie6, Xiangrong Song7, Yuanyuan Shen8, Jianjun Liu1, Ping Liu2, Gong-Ping Liu2,9, Xifei Yang1 1. Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Shenzhen, Shenzhen Medical Key Subject of Modern Toxicology, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, 518055, China. 2. Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of China and Hubei Province for Neurological Disorders, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. 3. Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research New Drug Assessment Co. Ltd, Tianjin 300301, China. 4. Institute of New Drug Research and Guangzhou, Key Laboratory of Innovative Chemical Drug Research in Cardio-Cerebrovascular Diseases, Jinan University College of Pharmacy, Guangzhou 510632, China. 5. School of Chemical Biology and Biotechnology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, 518055, China. 6. State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 7. Department of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 8. National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. 9. Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, JS, China. #These authors contributed equally to this work.