Criteria 8B(I)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Table 1 Housing proposals and Highways England schemes Settlement Number of Main access to SRN Highways England schemes Comments houses Doncaster main urban 9,225-11,808 A1(M) Junctions 36, 37, A1 Redhouse to Darrington scheme The A1 schemes that will be area 38 and M18 Junctions 3, (Junctions 38—40). developed for delivery through RIS 4 A1(M) Doncaster Bypass scheme may provide the necessary mitigation (Junctions 35-38). of the traffic impact of housing Pinch Point / Technology scheme on development in the long term. the M18 between the M1 and M18 However the impact on the current Junction 3. network will need to be assessed, Pinch Point scheme linked to FARRRS mitigation may need to be identified for and Airport M18 Junctions 2-3. the short term if significant M18 Junction 4 North-east Bound Exit- development is expected in the first 5- slip Safety Improvement Scheme. 10 years. Thorne 646-923 M18 J6. None. No significant issues emerged in the NAT analysis of SHLAA sites. Mexborough 646-923 A1(M) Junction 36 or M1 A1(M) Doncaster Bypass scheme The A1 schemes that will be Junction 36. (Junctions 35-38). developed for delivery through RIS M1 Junctions 35a-39. may provide the necessary mitigation of the traffic impact of housing development in the long term. However the impact on the current network will need to be assessed, mitigation may need to be identified for the short term if significant development is expected in the first 5- 10 years. Conisbrough 646-923 A1(M) Junction 36. A1(M) Doncaster Bypass scheme The A1 schemes that will be (Junctions 35-38). developed for delivery through RIS may provide the necessary mitigation of the traffic impact of housing development in the long term. However the impact on the current network will need to be assessed, mitigation may need to be identified for the short term if significant development is expected in the first 5- 10 years. Adwick 646-923 A1(M) Junction 38. A1 Redhouse to Darrington scheme The A1 schemes that will be (Junctions 38—40). developed for delivery through RIS A1(M) Doncaster Bypass scheme may provide the necessary mitigation (Junctions 35-38). of the traffic impact of housing development in the long term. However the impact on the current network will need to be assessed, mitigation may need to be identified for the short term if significant development is expected in the first 5- 10 years. Armthorpe 646-923 M18 Junction 4. M18 Junction 4 North-east Bound Exit- Mitigation of the traffic impact of slip Safety Improvement Scheme. housing development may be necessary. Askern 646-923 A1/A639 junction at A1 Redhouse to Darrington scheme The A1 schemes that will be Barnsdale Bar or M62 (Junctions 38—40). developed for delivery through RIS Junction 34 may provide the necessary mitigation of the traffic impact of housing development in the long term. However the impact on the current network will need to be assessed, mitigation may need to be identified for the short term if significant development is expected in the first 5- 10 years. Rossington 1,200 M18 Junction 3 (after Pinch Point / Technology scheme on The Pinch Point schemes deal with completion of FARRRS). the M18 between the M1 and M18 short term issues. Additional mitigation Junction 3. of the traffic impact of housing Pinch Point scheme to enhance development may be necessary. capacity and improve access to FARRRS and Airport M18 Junctions 2- 3. Stainforth/Hatfield 1,200 M180 Junction 1 or M18 M18 Junction 4 North-east Bound Exit- Mitigation of the traffic impact of Junction 4. slip Safety Improvement Scheme. housing development may be necessary. Denaby Up to 1,600 A1(M) Junction 36 or A1(M) Doncaster Bypass scheme The A1 schemes that will be M18 Junction 1 (Junctions 35-38). developed for delivery through RIS Pinch Point / Technology scheme on may provide the necessary mitigation the M18 between the M1 and M18 of the traffic impact of housing Junction 3. development in the long term. However the impact on the current network will need to be assessed, mitigation may need to be identified for the short term if significant development is expected in the first 5- 10 years. Edlington A1(M) Junction 36 A1(M) Doncaster Bypass scheme The A1 schemes that will be (Junctions 35-38). developed for delivery through RIS may provide the necessary mitigation of the traffic impact of housing development in the long term. However the impact on the current network will need to be assessed, mitigation may need to be identified for the short term if significant development is expected in the first 5- 10 years. Carcroft/Skellow A1(M) Junction 38 A1 Redhouse to Darrington scheme The A1 schemes that will be (Junctions 38—40). developed for delivery through RIS A1(M) Doncaster Bypass scheme may provide the necessary mitigation (Junctions 35-38). of the traffic impact of housing development in the long term. However the impact on the current network will need to be assessed, mitigation may need to be identified for the short term if significant development is expected in the first 5- 10 years. Moorends M18 Junction 6 None. Mitigation of the traffic impact of housing development may be necessary. Tickhill Up to 1% M18 Junction 1 or 3 Pinch Point / Technology scheme on The Pinch Point schemes deal with the M18 between the M1 and M18 short term issues. Additional mitigation Junction 3. of the traffic impact of housing Pinch Point scheme to enhance development may be necessary, but capacity and improve access to the scale of housing development is FARRRS and Airport M18 Junctions 2- small. 3. Maltby M18 Junction 1 Pinch Point / Technology scheme on The Pinch Point schemes deal with the M18 between the M1 and M18 short term issues. Additional mitigation Junction 3. of the traffic impact of housing Pinch Point scheme to enhance development may be necessary, but capacity and improve access to the scale of housing development is FARRRS and Airport M18 Junctions 2- small. 3. Larger villages Up to 1% n/a n/a n/a Table 2 Employment proposals and Highways England schemes Type of development Quantity Comments Office development 140,000 metres2 of additional The two major schemes in the RIS should provide the necessary mitigation of the floor space mainly in Doncaster traffic impact on the A1(M) of office development in Doncaster town centre but centre. additional mitigation measures may be required on the M18. Retail/leisure Quantity not specified but The two major schemes in the RIS should provide the necessary mitigation of the confined to existing centres with traffic impact on the A1(M) of retail/leisure development in Doncaster town centre but potential expansion of additional mitigation measures may be required on the M18. Doncaster, Thorne and Retail/leisure developments on a scale appropriate to Thorne and Mexborough Mexborough centres. centres should require few, if any mitigation measures. Distribution / warehousing Up to 290 hectares - M18/M180 Mitigation measures may be needed at M18 Junctions 3 and 4. corridor at junctions close to Armthorpe, Stainforth/Hatfield and/or Thorne and the Strategic Rail Freight Interchange at Rossington. Businesses related to the 34-44 hectares for business Mitigation measures may be needed at M18 Junction 3. airport parks and aviation related activities. Light industry and An additional 190 hectares. Locations not specified. manufacturing Green industries Area/quantity not specified. None Doncaster Sites (May 2015) – Explanatory Note Column O - Strategic Highway Network Status. Level of impact: There are three possible entries: Small site, not assessed, no significant impact: These sites have not been assessed using the Network Analysis Tool (NAT). No significant impact: Sites that have been assessed using NAT and do not generate 30 or more one-way trips on one or more links on the network. The maximum number of trips on any one link shown by the Network Analysis Tool (NAT) where there is one or more links with a one-way flow of 30 or more trips in the morning peak hour. Column P - Location of primary impact (nearest junction on the SRN) Where there are more than 30 one-way trips on one or more links on the SRN, the number of the primary strategic road network junction that is affected is recorded. Column Q - Potential impact of non SRN traffic passing through the junction gyratory There are sites that generate substantial numbers of trips that are close to junctions on the SRN even if they do not have a significant traffic impact on the SRN (30 or more one-way trips on one or more links on the network). This is because development traffic may pass through the junction and worsen traffic conditions on the gyratory with the possibility of causing queuing problems on slip roads. This has been identified by judgment based on the size and location of the site, NAT output for the site, knowledge of the network and the opportunities for traffic to cross the motorway using the junction. Column Q contains the junction number that would be affected by ‘local trips’ from a site. Entries were not included where there is a ‘small site, not assessed, no significant impact’ entry in Column O. Column R - Potential for cumulative impact This records where there are clusters of sites with the potential for cumulative impact on individual junctions. This could be a mix of sites with an individual impact on the SRN or sites that, by themselves, have no significant impact. The entry is made where NAT shows 5 or more trips entering the SRN at the junction that is the main point of entry to the SRN from the development site.