DOCSLIB.ORG

Quanteye: Quantum Optics Instrumentation for Astronomy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OWL Instrument Concept Study QUANTUM OPTICS INSTRUMENTATION FOR ASTRONOMY 1 2 D. Dravins , C. Barbieri , 3 1 2 V. Da Deppo , D. Faria , S. Fornasier , 4 1 3 1 R. A. E. Fosbury , L. Lindegren , G. Naletto , R. Nilsson , 3 2 1 5 T. Occhipinti , F. Tamburini , H. Uthas , L. Zampieri (1) Lund Observatory, Box 43, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden (2) Department of Astronomy, University of Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 2, IT-35122 Padova, Italy (3) Dept. of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo, 6/B, IT-35131 Padova, Italy (4) Space Telescope-European Coordinating Facility & European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2, DE-85748 Garching bei München, Germany (5) INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, IT-35122 Padova, Italy OWL-CSR-ESO-00000-0162 — Version 1.0, October 2005 - 1 - Quantum Optics Instrumentation for Astronomy D. Dravins, C. Barbieri V. Da Deppo, D. Faria, S. Fornasier R. A. E. Fosbury, L. Lindegren, G. Naletto, R. Nilsson T. Occhipinti, F. Tamburini, H. Uthas, L. Zampieri OWL Instrument Concept Study, OWL-CSR-ESO-00000-0162 Version 1.0 — October 2005 - 2 - [ Blank page ] - 3 - TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………...… 3 Scope, Participants, and Schedule ………………………………………….....……...… 7 Executive Summary ………………………………………………...……………...……...… 9 1. The Road to Quantum Astronomy ………………………………………………...… 13 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Aims of the Study 1.3. High Time-Resolution Astrophysics 1.4. Which Timescales are Observationally Accessible? 1.5. Astrophysics on Subsecond Scales 1.6. Nanoseconds and Quantum Optics 1.7. Beyond Imaging, Photometry, and Spectroscopy 1.8. One-Photon Experiments 1.9. Two- and Multi-Photon Properties of Light 1.10. The Intensity Interferometer 1.10.1. The Narrabri interferometer 1.10.2. Intensity fluctuations when photon counting 1.10.3. The situation with a resolved star 1.10.4. Resolution vs. stellar surface temperature 1.10.5. The effect of atmospheric scintillation 1.10.6. The effect of polarization 1.11. Possible Modern Realizations of Intensity Interferometry 1.11.1. Very long baseline optical intensity interferometry? 1.11.2. Combining intensity interferometry with optical heterodyne 1.12. Intensity-Correlation Spectroscopy 1.13. Intensity Interferometry of Non-Photons 2. Quantum Phenomena in Astronomy ……………………………………………….. 43 2.1. Physics of Emission Processes 2.2. Cosmic Laser/Maser Sources 2.2.1. Non-equilibrium radiation in astrophysics 2.2.2. Mechanisms producing astrophysical lasers 2.2.3. A case study: Astrophysical lasers in Eta Carinae 2.2.4. Lasers in Wolf-Rayet and symbiotic stars 2.2.5. Hydrogen lasers/masers in the emission-line star MWC349A - 4 - 2.2.6. First masers in the Universe 2.2.7. CO2 lasers in planetary atmospheres 2.2.8. Lasers without population inversion? 2.2.9. Nanosecond pulses in pulsars 2.2.10. How short (and bright) pulses exist in nature? 2.2.11. Emission in magnetic fields of magnetars 2.2.12. Maser mechanism for optical pulsations in X-ray pulsars? 2.3. Photon Statistics as a Diagnostic Tool 2.3.1. Identifying laser effects in astronomical sources 2.3.2. Modeling photon statistics 2.4. Photon Orbital Angular Momentum 2.5. Quantum Gravity Effects? 3. Observational High-Speed Astrophysics ………………………………………….. 77 3.1. Examples of High-Speed Phenomena 3.1.1. Time domain and reprocessing: High-frequency phenomena in optical and infrared 3.1.2. Galactic X-ray binaries 3.1.3. Finding exoplanets through dark speckles 3.1.4. Occultations by the Moon, asteroids, and Kuiper-belt objects 3.2 Advantages of the Optical 3.3. Advantages of Great Light-Collecting Power 3.4. Advantages of Large Telescope Area 3.5. Using Optical Flux Collectors 3.5.1. MAGIC on La Palma 3.5.2. The H.E.S.S. observatory in Namibia 3.5.3. The Pierre Auger observatory in Argentina 3.5.4. Solar flux collectors 4. Instrumental Requirements ……………………………………………………….... 103 4.1. Optical and Near-IR Detectors for Nanosecond Astrophysics 4.1.1. Photomultipliers 4.1.2. Avalanche photodiodes 4.1.3. Futuristic detectors 4.2. Time Tagging and Time Distribution 5. QuantEYE Conceptual Instrument Design ………………………………...…… 127 5.1. QuantEYE Requirements and Identified Solutions 5.1.1. Time tagging accuracy and duration of operation 5.1.2 Spectral range and choice of detectors 5.1.3 Optical design requirements 5.1.4 Filters and polarizers 5.1.5 Electronic acquisition and data storage - 5 - 5.2. Requirements set by QuantEYE on OWL 5.3. Optical Design 5.3.1. Baseline: A non-imaging solution 5.4.1.1. Variants of the non-imaging solution 5.3.1.2. Further advantages of the non-imaging solution 5.3.2. An imaging solution 5.3.3. The second optical head 5.4. Photon Budget and Limiting Magnitude 5.4.1. Linear regime 5.4.2. Limiting magnitude 5.4.3. Integration times 5.5. Data Acquisition 5.5.1. Time-to-digital converter (TDC) 5.5.2. Clock reference and time precision 5.6. Electronics 5.6.1. Scenario (1): Ad hoc electronics 5.6.2. Scenario (2): Commercial solutions 5.7. Mechanical and Electrical Characteristics 5.8. Cost Estimates 5.9. Technical Issues in Current Design 5.10. Future Design Challenges 5.11. Instrumentation Physics 5.12. Quantum Information and Quantum Computing 5.13. A Possible Precursor for VLT 6. Observing with QuantEYE ………………………………………………………....... 169 6.1. Astronomical Targets 6.2. Connection to Other Astronomy Projects 7. Conclusions ………………………………………………………………………….…… 177 Appendices A1. Coherence Properties of Light …………………………………………………… 179 A1.1. Deviation from the Average, and Correlation Functions A1.2. Correlation Functions A1.3. Temporal Coherence and the Coherence Time A1.4. Spatial Coherence and the Coherence Area - 6 - A1.5. Coherence Volume and the Degeneracy Parameter A1.6. Bose-Einstein Statistics A1.7. Photon Antibunching and Sub-Poissonian Statistics A1.8. Photons from a Black Body A1.9. Fluctuations of Black-Body and Thermal Radiation A1.10. Statistical Analysis when Photon Counting A1.11. Experimental Evidence of Correlated Photon Fluctuations from Thermal Sources A2. Intensity Interferometry …………………………………………………………… 197 A2.1. The Original Interferometer at Narrabri A2.2. Examples of Intensity Fluctuations When Photon Counting A2.3. Resolution vs. Stellar Surface Temperature A3. High-Speed Instrumentation Worldwide ……………………………………… 205 A3.1. HSP on Hubble Space Telescope A3.2. HIPO on the SOFIA Airborne Telescope A3.3. ULTRACAM A3.4. STJ & TES: Superconducting Energy-Resolving Detectors A3.5. OPTIMA A3.6. MANIA A3.7. Optical SETI A3.8. Lunar- & Satellite Laser Ranging A3.9. QVANTOS A3.10. TRIFFID, MEKASPEK & MCCP, SUBARU, SALT, ESO-VLT, Opticon, and Other Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………..… 245 References and bibliography …...……………………………………………………… 247 - 7 - Scope, Participants, and Schedule Scope: This is the report of a conceptual design study of an instrument for optical astrophysics with the very highest time resolution feasible, adequate to identify and study also quantum-optical phenomena in the light from astronomical sources. It is not, however, any complete nor really comprehensive study of such an instrument, nor of all the science to be carried out with it. The limit of its scope should be understood from the fact that this document is the result of part-time work by a limited number of persons during a quite limited period of time, and thus parts of this report may more resemble “lecture notes” rather than an exhaustive monograph. Nevertheless, the combined documentation of various relevant issues, building upon previous varied experiences in observations, instrumentation, data analysis, and astrophysical theory, should give an adequate base upon which to build both a more detailed design study and the construction of a prototype instrument, to eventually evolve into a quantum eye for the future OWL telescope. Participants: The following persons took part in this study and in the preparation of this document: Cesare Barbieri, Department of Astronomy, University of Padova, Italy Vania Da Deppo, Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova Dainis Dravins, Lund Observatory, Lund University, Sweden Daniel Faria, Lund Observatory, Lund University, Sweden Sonia Fornasier, Department of Astronomy, University of Padova, Italy Bob Fosbury, ST-ECF, European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany Lennart Lindegren, Lund Observatory, Lund University, Sweden Giampiero Naletto, Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova Ricky Nilsson, Lund Observatory, Lund University, Sweden Tommaso Occhipinti, Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova Fabrizio Tamburini, Department of Astronomy, University of Padova Helena Uthas, Lund Observatory, Lund University, Sweden Luca Zampieri, INAF, Astronomical Observatory of Padova, Italy Coordinator for this study at ESO: Bob Fosbury Coordinator for the OWL instrumentation studies at ESO: Sandro D'Odorico The working group held meetings: 11 November 2004, at ESO Garching 22-23 March 2005, at University of Padova 7-9 June 2005, at Lund Observatory 26-28 September 2005, at ESO Garching This document was finalized in October, 2005 Correspondence regarding this report should be directed to: Dainis Dravins, e-mail: [email protected] Cesare Barbieri, e-mail: [email protected] - 8 - [ Blank page ] - 9 - Executive Summary QuantEYE QuantEYE is conceived to be the highest time-resolution instrument in optical astronomy. It is designed to explore astrophysical variability on microsecond and nanosecond scales, reaching down to the quantum-optical limit.
Recommended publications

  • Astronomy 241: Foundations of Astrophysics I. the Solar System

    Astronomy 241: Foundations of Astrophysics I. The Solar System Astronomy 241 is the first part of a year-long Prerequisites: Physics 170, Physics 272 introduction to astrophysics. It uses basic (or concurrent), and Math 242 or 252A. classical mechanics and thermodynamics to Contact: Professor Joshua Barnes analyze the structure and evolution of the ([email protected]; 956-8138) Solar System. www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~barnes/ast241 Tuesday, August 21, 2012 Astrophysics BS Degree Proposal in ASTR PHYS MATH CHEM preparation FALL 241 251A 161, 171 or 181 year 1 161L, 171L, or 181L SPRING 170 242 252A 162 year 1 170L 162L Foundations of Astrophysics I: FALL 241 272 243 253A The Solar System year 2 272L Foundations of Astrophysics II: SPRING 242 274 244 Galaxies & Stars year 2 274L Observational Astronomy & FALL 300 310 311 (or 307?) Laboratory year 3 300L 350 SPRING 301 311 Observational Project year 3 450 FALL 423 480 Stellar Astrophysics year 4 495 SPRING 496 481 Senior Project I, II year4 485 1 of: ASTR 320, 426, or 430 Tuesday, August 21, 2012 Units Text uses MKS units (meter, kilo-gram, second); e.g. G ≃ 6.674 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 (gravitational constant). Astronomers also use non-standard units: AU ≃ 1.496 × 1011 m (“average” Earth-Sun distance) 30 M⊙ ≃ 1.989 × 10 kg (Sun’s mass) yr ≃ 3.156 × 107 s (Earth’s orbital period) Tuesday, August 21, 2012 Order of Magnitude & Dimensional Analysis: An Example Given that Jupiter’s average density is slightly greater than water, estimate the orbital period of a satellite circling just above the planet.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, MERCED Open System Dynamics In

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, MERCED Open System Dynamics In

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED Open system dynamics in quantum optomechanics A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Dan Hu Committee in charge: Professor Jay E. Sharping, Chair Professor Harish S. Bhat Professor Kevin A. Mitchell Professor Lin Tian, Dissertation Advisor 2014 Copyright Dan Hu, 2014 All rights reserved The dissertation of Dan Hu, titled Open system dynamics in quantum optomechanics, is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair Date Professor Jay E. Sharping Date Professor Harish S. Bhat Date Professor Kevin A. Mitchell Date Professor Lin Tian University of California, Merced 2014 iii This dissertation is dedicated to my family. iv Contents Abstract vii List of Figures ix List of Tables xi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Cavity Optomechanics . 2 1.2 Optomechanical Phenomena . 4 1.3 Nonlinear Quantum Optomechanical System . 14 2 Linearized Optomechanical Interaction 16 2.1 Blue-detuned Optomechanics . 17 2.2 Optomechanical System With Periodic Driving . 31 3 Nonlinear Optomechanical Effects with Perturbation 42 3.1 Introduction . 43 3.2 Optomechanical System . 44 3.3 Perturbation in the Heisenberg Picture . 45 3.4 Applications of the Perturbation Solutions . 47 3.5 Conclusions . 54 4 Strongly Coupled Optomechanical System 55 4.1 Introduction . 56 4.2 Dressed-state Master Equation . 57 4.3 Analytical Solutions . 61 4.4 Numerical Results . 62 4.5 Conclusions . 70 5 Conclusions and Future Work 71 Appendix A Blue-detuned optomechanical system 73 v A.1 Covariance Matrix under RWA . 73 A.2 Optomechanical Entanglement between Cavity Output Mode and Me- chanical Mode .
  • Lecture 5. Interstellar Dust: Optical Properties

    Lecture 5. Interstellar Dust: Optical Properties

    Lecture 5. Interstellar Dust: Optical Properties 1. Introduction 2. Extinction 3. Mie Scattering 4. Dust to Gas Ratio 5. Appendices References Spitzer Ch. 7, Osterbrock Ch. 7 DC Whittet, Dust in the Galactic Environment (IoP, 2002) E Krugel, Physics of Interstellar Dust (IoP, 2003) B Draine, ARAA, 41, 241, 2003 1. Introduction: Brief History of Dust Nebular gas long accepted but existence of absorbing interstellar dust controversial. Herschel (1738-1822) found few stars in some directions, later extensively demonstrated by Barnard’s photos of dark clouds. Trumpler (PASP 42 214 1930) conclusively demonstrated interstellar absorption by comparing luminosity distances & angular diameter distances for open clusters: • Angular diameter distances are systematically smaller • Discrepancy grows with distance • Distant clusters are redder • Estimated ~ 2 mag/kpc absorption • Attributed it to Rayleigh scattering by gas Some of the Evidence for Interstellar Dust Extinction (reddening of bright stars, dark clouds) Polarization of starlight Scattering (reflection nebulae) Continuum IR emission Depletion of refractory elements from the gas Dust is also observed in the winds of AGB stars, SNRs, young stellar objects (YSOs), comets, interplanetary Dust particles (IDPs), and in external galaxies. The extinction varies continuously with wavelength and requires macroscopic absorbers (or “dust” particles). Examples of the Effects of Dust Extinction B68 Scattering - Pleiades Extinction: Some Definitions Optical depth, cross section, & efficiency: ext ext ext τ λ = ∫ ndustσ λ ds = σ λ ∫ ndust 2 = πa Qext (λ) Ndust nd is the volumetric dust density The magnitude of the extinction Aλ : ext I(λ) = I0 (λ) exp[−τ λ ] Aλ =−2.5log10 []I(λ)/I0(λ) ext ext = 2.5log10(e)τ λ =1.086τ λ 2.
  • Determination of the Night Sky Background Around the Crab Pulsar Using Its Optical Pulsation

    Determination of the Night Sky Background Around the Crab Pulsar Using Its Optical Pulsation

    28th International Cosmic Ray Conference 2449 Determination of the Night Sky Background around the Crab Pulsar Using its Optical Pulsation E. O˜na-Wilhelmi1,2, J. Cortina3, O.C. de Jager1, V. Fonseca2 for the MAGIC collaboration (1) Unit for Space Physics, Potchefstroom University for CHE, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa (2) Dept. de f´isica At´omica, Nuclear y Molecular, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Madrid, Spain (3) Institut de Fisica de l’Altes Energies, UAB, Barcelona, Spain Abstract The poor angular resolution of imaging γ-ray telescopes is offset by the large collection area of the next generation telescopes such as MAGIC (17 m diameter) which makes the study of optical emission associated with some γ-ray sources feasible. In particular the optical photon flux causes an increase in the photomultiplier DC currents. Furthermore, the extremely fast response of PMs make them ideal detectors for fast (subsecond) optical transients and periodic sources like pulsars. The HEGRA CT1 telescope (1.8 m radius) is the smallest Cerenkovˆ telescope which has seen the Crab optical pulsations. 1. Method Imaging Atmospheric Cerenkovˆ Detectors (IACT) can be used to detect the optical emission of an astronomical object through the increase it generates in the currents of the camera pixels [7,3]. Since the Crab pulsar shows pulsed emission in the optical wavelengths with the same frequency as in radio and most probably of VHE γ-rays, we use the central pixel of CT1 [5] and MAGIC [1] to monitor the optical Crab pulsation. Before the Crab observations were performed, the expected rate of the Crab pulsar and background were estimated theoretically.
  • European Astroparticle Physics Strategy 2017-2026 Astroparticle Physics European Consortium

    European Astroparticle Physics Strategy 2017-2026 Astroparticle Physics European Consortium

    European Astroparticle Physics Strategy 2017-2026 Astroparticle Physics European Consortium August 2017 European Astroparticle Physics Strategy 2017-2026 www.appec.org Executive Summary Astroparticle physics is the fascinating field of research long-standing mysteries such as the true nature of Dark at the intersection of astronomy, particle physics and Matter and Dark Energy, the intricacies of neutrinos cosmology. It simultaneously addresses challenging and the occurrence (or non-occurrence) of proton questions relating to the micro-cosmos (the world decay. of elementary particles and their fundamental interactions) and the macro-cosmos (the world of The field of astroparticle physics has quickly celestial objects and their evolution) and, as a result, established itself as an extremely successful endeavour. is well-placed to advance our understanding of the Since 2001 four Nobel Prizes (2002, 2006, 2011 and Universe beyond the Standard Model of particle physics 2015) have been awarded to astroparticle physics and and the Big Bang Model of cosmology. the recent – revolutionary – first direct detections of gravitational waves is literally opening an entirely new One of its paths is targeted at a better understanding and exhilarating window onto our Universe. We look of cataclysmic events such as: supernovas – the titanic forward to an equally exciting and productive future. explosions marking the final evolutionary stage of massive stars; mergers of multi-solar-mass black-hole Many of the next generation of astroparticle physics or neutron-star binaries; and, most compelling of all, research infrastructures require substantial capital the violent birth and subsequent evolution of our infant investment and, for Europe to remain competitive Universe.
  • Quantum Noise in Quantum Optics: the Stochastic Schr\" Odinger

    Quantum Noise in Quantum Optics: the Stochastic Schr\" Odinger

    Quantum Noise in Quantum Optics: the Stochastic Schr¨odinger Equation Peter Zoller † and C. W. Gardiner ∗ † Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria ∗ Department of Physics, Victoria University Wellington, New Zealand February 1, 2008 arXiv:quant-ph/9702030v1 12 Feb 1997 Abstract Lecture Notes for the Les Houches Summer School LXIII on Quantum Fluc- tuations in July 1995: “Quantum Noise in Quantum Optics: the Stochastic Schroedinger Equation” to appear in Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1997, edited by E. Giacobino and S. Reynaud. 0.1 Introduction Theoretical quantum optics studies “open systems,” i.e. systems coupled to an “environment” [1, 2, 3, 4]. In quantum optics this environment corresponds to the infinitely many modes of the electromagnetic field. The starting point of a description of quantum noise is a modeling in terms of quantum Markov processes [1]. From a physical point of view, a quantum Markovian description is an approximation where the environment is modeled as a heatbath with a short correlation time and weakly coupled to the system. In the system dynamics the coupling to a bath will introduce damping and fluctuations. The radiative modes of the heatbath also serve as input channels through which the system is driven, and as output channels which allow the continuous observation of the radiated fields. Examples of quantum optical systems are resonance fluorescence, where a radiatively damped atom is driven by laser light (input) and the properties of the emitted fluorescence light (output)are measured, and an optical cavity mode coupled to the outside radiation modes by a partially transmitting mirror.
  • Detection and Characterization of Hot Subdwarf Companions of Massive Stars Luqian Wang

    Detection and Characterization of Hot Subdwarf Companions of Massive Stars Luqian Wang

    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Physics and Astronomy Dissertations Department of Physics and Astronomy 8-13-2019 Detection And Characterization Of Hot Subdwarf Companions Of Massive Stars Luqian Wang Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/phy_astr_diss Recommended Citation Wang, Luqian, "Detection And Characterization Of Hot Subdwarf Companions Of Massive Stars." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/phy_astr_diss/119 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Physics and Astronomy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics and Astronomy Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF HOT SUBDWARF COMPANIONS OF MASSIVE STARS by LUQIAN WANG Under the Direction of Douglas R. Gies, PhD ABSTRACT Massive stars are born in close binaries, and in the course of their evolution, the initially more massive star will grow and begin to transfer mass and angular momentum to the gainer star. The mass donor star will be stripped of its outer envelope, and it will end up as a faint, hot subdwarf star. Here I present a search for the subdwarf stars in Be binary systems using the International Ultraviolet Explorer. Through spectroscopic analysis, I detected the subdwarf star in HR 2142 and 60 Cyg. Further analysis led to the discovery of an additional 12 Be and subdwarf candidate systems. I also investigated the EL CVn binary system, which is the prototype of class of eclipsing binaries that consist of an A- or F-type main sequence star and a low mass subdwarf.
  • Essay on Optics

    Essay on Optics

    Essay on Optics by Émilie du Châtelet translated, with notes, by Bryce Gessell published by LICENSE AND CITATION INFORMATION 2019 © Bryce Gessell This work is licensed by the copyright holder under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Published by Project Vox http://projectvox.org How to cite this text: Du Châtelet, Emilie. Essay on Optics. Translated by Bryce Gessell. Project Vox. Durham, NC: Duke University Libraries, 2019. http://projectvox.org/du-chatelet-1706-1749/texts/essay-on-optics This translation is based on the copy of Du Châtelet’s Essai sur l’Optique located in the Universitätsbibliothek Basel (L I a 755, fo. 230–265). The original essay was transcribed and edited in 2017 by Bryce Gessell, Fritz Nagel, and Andrew Janiak, and published on Project Vox (http://projectvox.org/du-chatelet-1706-1749/texts/essai-sur-loptique). 2 This work is governed by a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You may share or adapt the work if you give credit, link to the license, and indicate changes. You may not use the work for commercial purposes. See creativecommons.org for details. CONTENTS License and Citation Information 2 Editor’s Introduction to the Essay and the Translation 4 Essay on Optics Introduction 7 Essay on Optics Chapter 1: On Light 8 Essay on Optics Chapter 2: On Transparent Bodies, and on the Causes of Transparence 11 Essay on Optics Chapter 3: On Opacity, and on Opaque Bodies 28 Essay on Optics Chapter 4: On the Formation of Colors 37 Appendix 1: Figures for Essay on Optics 53 Appendix 2: Daniel II Bernoulli’s Note 55 Appendix 3: Figures from Musschenbroek’s Elementa Physicae (1734) 56 Appendix 4: Figures from Newton’s Principia Mathematica (1726) 59 3 This work is governed by a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
  • Quasistellar Objects: Overview ENCYCLOPEDIA of ASTRONOMY and ASTROPHYSICS

    Quasistellar Objects: Overview ENCYCLOPEDIA of ASTRONOMY and ASTROPHYSICS

    eaa.iop.org DOI: 10.1888/0333750888/1585 Quasistellar Objects: Overview Patrick Osmer From Encyclopedia of Astronomy & Astrophysics P. Murdin © IOP Publishing Ltd 2006 ISBN: 0333750888 Institute of Physics Publishing Bristol and Philadelphia Downloaded on Thu Mar 02 22:43:08 GMT 2006 [131.215.103.76] Terms and Conditions Quasistellar Objects: Overview ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS Quasistellar Objects: Overview Quasistellar objects, or quasars, were defined originally as star-like objects of large redshift. Quasars are believed to be powered by the accretion of matter onto massive black holes at the centers of galaxies, a process that emits more energy than thermonuclear reactions. Today, quasars are considered to be the most luminous members of the general class of objects called active galactic nuclei, or AGNs. Quasars are the most luminous objects in the universe. This article begins with a brief history of the discovery of quasars. Next it describes their main properties and the concepts that have been developed to explain them. It continues with a description of their nature and theoretical models. Then additional properties and topics are considered: absorption lines, host galaxies, Figure 1. Optical image of 3C273. The object looks stellar in and luminosity functions and evolution. this image except that it is accompanied by a jet of radiation extending to the lower right. (Credit National Optical Astronomy Observatories/National Science Foundation. History Copyright Association of Universities for Research in In 1960 Mathews and Sandage identified the radio source Astronomy Inc (AURA), all rights reserved.) 3C 48 (the 48th object in the 3rd Cambridge catalog of radio sources) with a star-like object of 16th magnitude.
  • Quantum Computation and Complexity Theory

    Quantum Computation and Complexity Theory

    Quantum computation and complexity theory Course given at the Institut fÈurInformationssysteme, Abteilung fÈurDatenbanken und Expertensysteme, University of Technology Vienna, Wintersemester 1994/95 K. Svozil Institut fÈur Theoretische Physik University of Technology Vienna Wiedner Hauptstraûe 8-10/136 A-1040 Vienna, Austria e-mail: [email protected] December 5, 1994 qct.tex Abstract The Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics is reviewed with emphasis on applicationsto quantum computing. Standardinterferomeric techniques are used to construct a physical device capable of universal quantum computation. Some consequences for recursion theory and complexity theory are discussed. hep-th/9412047 06 Dec 94 1 Contents 1 The Quantum of action 3 2 Quantum mechanics for the computer scientist 7 2.1 Hilbert space quantum mechanics ..................... 7 2.2 From single to multiple quanta Ð ªsecondº ®eld quantization ...... 15 2.3 Quantum interference ............................ 17 2.4 Hilbert lattices and quantum logic ..................... 22 2.5 Partial algebras ............................... 24 3 Quantum information theory 25 3.1 Information is physical ........................... 25 3.2 Copying and cloning of qbits ........................ 25 3.3 Context dependence of qbits ........................ 26 3.4 Classical versus quantum tautologies .................... 27 4 Elements of quantum computatability and complexity theory 28 4.1 Universal quantum computers ....................... 30 4.2 Universal quantum networks ........................ 31 4.3 Quantum recursion theory ......................... 35 4.4 Factoring .................................. 36 4.5 Travelling salesman ............................. 36 4.6 Will the strong Church-Turing thesis survive? ............... 37 Appendix 39 A Hilbert space 39 B Fundamental constants of physics and their relations 42 B.1 Fundamental constants of physics ..................... 42 B.2 Conversion tables .............................. 43 B.3 Electromagnetic radiation and other wave phenomena .........
  • Experiencing Hubble

    Experiencing Hubble

    PRESCOTT ASTRONOMY CLUB PRESENTS EXPERIENCING HUBBLE John Carter August 7, 2019 GET OUT LOOK UP • When Galaxies Collide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP3x7TgvgR8 • How Hubble Images Get Color https://www.youtube.com/watch? time_continue=3&v=WSG0MnmUsEY Experiencing Hubble Sagittarius Star Cloud 1. 12,000 stars 2. ½ percent of full Moon area. 3. Not one star in the image can be seen by the naked eye. 4. Color of star reflects its surface temperature. Eagle Nebula. M 16 1. Messier 16 is a conspicuous region of active star formation, appearing in the constellation Serpens Cauda. This giant cloud of interstellar gas and dust is commonly known as the Eagle Nebula, and has already created a cluster of young stars. The nebula is also referred to the Star Queen Nebula and as IC 4703; the cluster is NGC 6611. With an overall visual magnitude of 6.4, and an apparent diameter of 7', the Eagle Nebula's star cluster is best seen with low power telescopes. The brightest star in the cluster has an apparent magnitude of +8.24, easily visible with good binoculars. A 4" scope reveals about 20 stars in an uneven background of fainter stars and nebulosity; three nebulous concentrations can be glimpsed under good conditions. Under very good conditions, suggestions of dark obscuring matter can be seen to the north of the cluster. In an 8" telescope at low power, M 16 is an impressive object. The nebula extends much farther out, to a diameter of over 30'. It is filled with dark regions and globules, including a peculiar dark column and a luminous rim around the cluster.
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In

    A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In

    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).