Jsvol 16.1.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
J EFFERS S TUDIES V O L U M E 16 N U M B E R S 1 & 2 S P R I N G & F A L L 2012 A Double Issue C o n t e n t s E D I T O R ’ S N O T E iii Scholarly Articles The Shamanic Archetype in Robinson Jeffers’s Poetry Steven B. Herrmann 1 The Cosmological Dimension of Jeffers’s Poetry Steven Chapman 35 Robinson Jeffers, W. B. Yeats, and Ecoprophecy Deborah Fleming 65 Mara: The Poem of Foreboding Robert Zaller 87 Book Reviews 99 Inventing the Language to Tell It by George Hart Reviewed by Greg Williams Robinson Jeffers and the American Sublime by Robert Zaller Reviewed by James Karman Garth Jeffers Recalls His Father, Robinson Jeffers: Recollections of a Poet’s Son. by Audrey Lynch Reviewed by Robert Zaller Obituaries 116 Kyuja Yoo Kafka, Helen Tartar, Alex Vardamis Contributors 120 Cover Photo: Robinson Jeffers in the Doorway of Hawk Tower, c. 1925, by Lewis Josselyn. from a copy in the archives of the tor house foundation. for a discussion of this image, see page 25 in this issue. iii Editor’s Note Readers of the works of Robinson Jeffers are familiar with the energy- based explanation of existence coupled with a monistic philosophy that the poet presented from the 1920’s onward. From Jeffers’s viewpoint, all existence, even that of inanimate forms, is driven by an ancient and vast energy transformation system which, on our planet, has resulted in life, and ultimately in the life of human beings. All parts of the system are connected, and none is more important than any other. Furthermore, all of it is destined to cease to exist, not just the living beings, but the universe itself. All of this is divine, all of it God, including ourselves, shards of divinity. Jeffers adds as a further explanation of our human role: we can recognize and honor our share of this immense universe, but only if we shed the human concern with personal self-centeredness, which results in frustration, heartbreak, greed, and war. This forecast is hard to understand intellectually, and even more difficult to embrace emotionally, even for Jeffers himself; one may think of his entire work as an attempt to fully engage and cope with the implications of this worldview. The four essays which appear in this issue of Jeffers Studies approach the problems noted above from different perspectives, and each helps us to deepen our understanding of Jeffers’s great vision. I begin with the shortest essay and move to the longer ones because each article approaches the philosophy differently, beginning with the problems of one Jeffersian main character. In “’Mara:’ The Poem of Foreboding,” Robert Zaller analyzes one of the short narratives which has had little attention from other critics. This poem deals in one sense with a problem which plagues all monistic systems: if all is part of one vast whole in which no part is more important than any other, how can one choose a course of action which is informed by anything more than personal self-seeking? Zaller includes Bruce Ferguson, the main character of “Mara,” as one of those he has identified in his earlier critical works as Jeffers’s “heroes of endurance.” Such characters recognize the truth of the philosophy described above, and each reacts to this knowledge differently. Ferguson, emotionally shattered by his wife’s infidelity, can Jeffers Studies 16.1-2 (Spring & Fall 2012), iii-v. Copyright © 2015 Jim Baird. All Rights Reserved. iv Jeffers Studies find no moral reason to condemn or avenge this act which is finally just the instinctive behavior of another animal. Zaller details how Ferguson is trapped between his personal rage and sorrow and his inability to fully accept the indifference of nature. Deborah Fleming has contributed to this journal before with essays concerning her two favorite poets, W. B. Yeats and Jeffers. Her “Robinson Jeffers, W.B. Yeats, and Ecoprophecy” continues this line of investigation by examining the links between these artists in terms of not only stylistic and symbolic similarities but also their fondness for towers. From these symbolic structures, which rise above and separate them from the rest of human society, but also, through that withdrawal, allow for continued healing meditation. This ability to reflect allows both to rise above the charnel house of the twentieth century to a bond with nature which is permanent and rewarding in contrast to a human adventure fated for tragedy. Professor Fleming’s essay is a slightly different version of a chapter from her forthcoming book, Towers of Myth and Stone: Yeats’ Influence on Robinson Jeffers, which will be published by the University of South Carolina Press in 2015. Steven Chapman investigates Jeffers’s philosophy from the standpoint of physics in his “The Cosmological Dimension of Jeffers’s Poetry.” Including a thorough review of the scientific discoveries of the 1920s through the 1950s, he explains how the poet’s awareness of the debates over the origin of the universe and its essence in terms of space and time informed and reinforced the poet’s view of all existence as a consequence of the immense energy from which it sprang and which still drives it. Chapman also points out that Jeffers was selective in his use of such theories; the poet knew that science can help us understand truth, but it is finally a description which, because of its evolving nature and its limitation to the investigation of physical reality, cannot give us all that we need to cope with the conditions it reveals. Steven Herrmann shows how Jeffers used tools other than science and superficial observation of nature to expand his worldview in order to help us do that coping in “The Shamanistic Archetype in Robinson Jeffers’s Poetry.” In view of Jeffers’s often stated antipathy to heroism, messianic purpose, and other themes which would endow him with a leadership role which he not only did not covet but which did not fit his philosophy, it is surprising to think of Jeffers as a shaman—a spiritual leader—but Herrmann’s analysis of Jeffers’s poetry shows that many of the themes and devices that Jeffers employs have been used by shamans for thousands of years to achieve the kind of spiritual breakthrough from the mere physical existence of the universe to a transcendent understanding not formed from logic. In addition, Herrmann touches on the works of Carl Jung and D. H. Lawrence, and uses the work of some of the same Editor’s Note v scientists whom Steven Chapman discusses in describing Jeffers’s work on the shamanistic plane. In addition, this issue also contains reviews of three recent books about Jeffers. Robert Zaller reviews Audry Lynch’s Garth Jeffers Recalls His Father, Robinson Jeffers, the product of her interviews with Jeffers’s son. James Karman takes time out from his editing of the final volume of Robinson and Una Jeffers’s letters to evaluate Robert Zaller’s comprehensive Robinson Jeffers and the American Sublime. Finally, Greg Williams reviews Inventing the Language to Tell It: Robinson Jeffers and the Biology of Consciousness by George Hart, a previous editor of Jeffers Studies. Greg is the longtime typesetter of this journal and also an independent scholar of Jeffers’s work. He has decided to end his typesetting duties, but this review is first appearance here as a critic, and we hope it will not be the last. 1 Steven B. Herrmann The Shamanic Archetype in Robinson Jeffers’s Poetry I The Call From Without It was in an essay called “Psychology and Literature” that C. G. Jung postulated two kinds of artistic creation, the psychological and the visionary. In Jung’s view, which Robinson Jeffers was well aware of (Herrmann, Visionary Artist), it is the non-psychological type of literary creation that paradoxically offers the richest opportunities for psychological elucidation, and he cites Moby-Dick as the greatest American novel (CW 15: 137). One of Jung’s students, the Jungian analyst Joseph L. Henderson, who had many links to Big Sur, went further than Jung had done to introduce a Pacific Coast sensibility into archetypal literary theory by asserting that shamanism is historically the root for the prototype of the “seer-poet” (or the “prophet-poet-sage”), and that all true philosophic attitudes arise from the archetype of the shaman (89-91). This is an idea that was picked up and developed by my former Jungian analyst, Donald F. Sandner, in the field of analytical psychology (Herrmann, “Sandner”). But it was my late friend and mentor, William Everson, who first enabled me to see its crucial importance for the evolution of American poetry (Herrmann, Conversation; Shaman’s Call). My comments here are an attempt at homage for his totemic presence in my own development as a literary historian. I think of shamanism as a symbolic process of transformation that takes place at an emotional and an instinctive level, and as a method of ecstasy it forms itself into an image that is archetypal. This archetype, which in 2002 (following the leads of Everson and Sandner) I called the shamanic archetype, takes on concrete form through ritual enactments of dreams, spirit visitations, and inner visions that are performed through ritual drama or poetry. As a spiritual practice shamanism is based on Jeffers Studies 16.1-2 (Spring & Fall 2012), 1-33. Copyright © 2015 Steven B. Herrmann. All Rights Reserved. 2 Jeffers Studies a pattern of behavior, an inborn form of perceiving the inner and outer Cosmos, that forms the inner idea informing an instinct for activity that leads to artistic representation and operates in close relation to an effort to heal personal, social, and environmental imbalances.