DOCSLIB.ORG

Operation Backfire’

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operation Backfire’ Countering Eco-Terrorism in the United States: The Case of ‘Operation Backfire’ Final Report to the Science & Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security September 2012 National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism A Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Center of Excellence Based at the University of Maryland 3300 Symons Hall • College Park, MD 20742 • 301.405.6600 • www.start.umd.edu National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism A Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Center of Excellence About This Report The authors of this report are Nick Deshpande (M.A. Candidate at American Military University) and Howard Ernst (United States Naval Academy). Questions about this report should be directed to Nick Deshpande at [email protected]. The authors would like to express their gratitude to, first and foremost: Chuck Tilby, a former captain with the Eugene (Oregon) Police Department, and Kirk Engdall, a former Assistant United States Attorney, for their time and service to their country as well as their assistance with crafting this paper; Andrew Laughlin, Geoff Haskell and Dr. Max Abrahms provided valuable insight and assistance along the way; Paxton Roberts, Research Project Manager at the Terrorism Research Center in Fulbright College, University of Arkansas and his crew facilitated access to the court documents, for which we are grateful; and much thanks is owed to the paper’s editors, Dr. Kathleen Smarick, Dr. Brooke Fisher Liu and William Braniff, of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) at the University of Maryland. This report is part of a series sponsored by the Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in support of the Prevent/Deter program. The goal of this program is to sponsor research that will aid the intelligence and law enforcement communities in identifying potential terrorist threats and support policymakers in developing prevention efforts. This research was supported through Grant Award Number 2009ST108LR0003 made to the START Consortium and the University of Maryland under principal investigator Gary LaFree. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or START. About START The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) is supported in part by the Science and Technology Directorate of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through a Center of Excellence program based at the University of Maryland. START uses state‐of‐the‐art theories, methods and data from the social and behavioral sciences to improve understanding of the origins, dynamics and social and psychological impacts of terrorism. For more information, contact START at [email protected] or visit www.start.umd.edu. Citations To cite this report, please use this format: Deshpande, Nick, and Howard Ernst. “Countering Eco‐Terrorism in the United States: The Case of ‘Operation Backfire’.” Final Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. College Park, MD: START, 2012. Countering Eco-Terrorism in the United States: The Case of ‘Operation Backfire’ National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism A Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Center of Excellence Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Methods and Terminology .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Measuring Counterterrorism Effects and Effectiveness ..................................................................................................... 6 Primer on Eco-Terrorism ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 The Rise of the Radical Environmentalist Movement ......................................................................................................... 8 The “Direct Action” Tactics of Radical Environmentalist Groups ....................................................................................... 9 Major Groups in the Radical Environmentalist Movement .............................................................................................. 11 Descriptive Analysis of REM Incidents and Eco-Terrorism ............................................................................................... 13 Eco-Terrorism in the United States ................................................................................................................................... 14 The Family ............................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Operation Backfire ................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Design and Implementation of Countermeasures against Eco-Terrorism ........................................................................... 23 Link Analysis Tools ............................................................................................................................................................ 24 Resource Management ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 Lasting Impact? ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Conclusion and Future Research........................................................................................................................................... 29 Works Cited ........................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix 1: Data from the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR)............................................................................... 35 Countering Eco-Terrorism in the United States: The Case of ‘Operation Backfire’ 1 National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism A Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Center of Excellence Executive Summary American counterterrorism officials consider those who commit violent acts in the name of the environment and animal rights a serious threat to homeland security. In congressional testimony more than six years ago, Senator James Inhofe noted that radical actors affiliated with the Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front had caused more than $110 million in damage between approximately 1995 and 2005 (Inhofe 2005). Since that time, members of the radical environmentalist movement (REM) continue to carve out a prominent place in the domestic terrorism landscape. In this report, we examine a joint, inter‐agency investigation, known as Operation Backfire, into acts of eco‐terrorism that occurred in the country’s Northwest at the turn of the millennium. The target of Operation Backfire, a group known as the Family, caused more than $40 million in property damage and disrupted numerous lives and businesses from 1996‐2001 (Engdall et al. 2007; Likar 2011). The purpose of this work is to frame Operation Backfire as a terrorism countermeasure and assess what made it effective at dismantling the Family and altering the landscape for actors associated with the REM. Making extensive use of original data (i.e., the Institute for the Study of Violent Groups and the Global Terrorism Database), court documentation related to each of the 18 indictments, and interviews with two key investigators, we examine the concept of eco‐terrorism, how to measure counterterrorism effectiveness, resource allocation in inter‐agency settings, and deterrence. Our qualitative approach focuses on the characteristics and factors that made the investigation effective. The measurement of a countermeasure’s efficacy poses numerous challenges since there are various, but no universally accepted, metrics for effectiveness. In this case, successful arrests and convictions are certainly one indicator of Operation Backfire’s effectiveness. But assessments should also take into consideration the expenditure of resources, a comparison of desired results versus the outcomes (e.g., the dismantling of the Family), and the adherence to best practices and regulations. Further, organizational efficacy, which considers the structure of an organization and the performance of its members, should be accounted for. A measure’s ability to adapt to a changing situation is also an important metric that we examine in this study. Lastly, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Missionary Perspectives and Experiences of 19Th and Early 20Th Century Droughts
    1 2 “Everything is scorched by the burning sun”: Missionary perspectives and 3 experiences of 19th and early 20th century droughts in semi-arid central 4 Namibia 5 6 Stefan Grab1, Tizian Zumthurm,2,3 7 8 1 School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the 9 Witwatersrand, South Africa 10 2 Institute of the History of Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland 11 3 Centre for African Studies, University of Basel, Switzerland 12 13 Correspondence to: Stefan Grab ([email protected]) 14 15 Abstract. Limited research has focussed on historical droughts during the pre-instrumental 16 weather-recording period in semi-arid to arid human-inhabited environments. Here we describe 17 the unique nature of droughts over semi-arid central Namibia (southern Africa) between 1850 18 and 1920. More particularly, our intention is to establish temporal shifts of influence and 19 impact that historical droughts had on society and the environment during this period. This is 20 achieved through scrutinizing documentary records sourced from a variety of archives and 21 libraries. The primary source of information comes from missionary diaries, letters and reports. 22 These missionaries were based at a variety of stations across the central Namibian region and 23 thus collectively provide insight to sub-regional (or site specific) differences in hydro- 24 meteorological conditions, and drought impacts and responses. Earliest instrumental rainfall 25 records (1891-1913) from several missionary stations or settlements are used to quantify hydro- 26 meteorological conditions and compare with documentary sources. The work demonstrates 27 strong-sub-regional contrasts in drought conditions during some given drought events and the 28 dire implications of failed rain seasons, the consequences of which lasted many months to 29 several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Environmentalism: the New Civil Disobedience?
    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 6 Issue 1 Fall/Winter 2007 Article 35 November 2007 Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience? Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia Hernandez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Hernandez, Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia (2007) "Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience?," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 35. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol6/iss1/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 289 Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience? César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández1 God said, “I have given you every seed-bearing plant which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree that bears fruit with seed. It will be for your food. To every wild animal, to every bird of the sky, to everything that creeps along the ground, to everything that has the breath of life, I give every green plant for food.” So it was. God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. Book of Genesis2 We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Literariness.Org-Mareike-Jenner-Auth
    Crime Files Series General Editor: Clive Bloom Since its invention in the nineteenth century, detective fiction has never been more pop- ular. In novels, short stories, films, radio, television and now in computer games, private detectives and psychopaths, prim poisoners and overworked cops, tommy gun gangsters and cocaine criminals are the very stuff of modern imagination, and their creators one mainstay of popular consciousness. Crime Files is a ground-breaking series offering scholars, students and discerning readers a comprehensive set of guides to the world of crime and detective fiction. Every aspect of crime writing, detective fiction, gangster movie, true-crime exposé, police procedural and post-colonial investigation is explored through clear and informative texts offering comprehensive coverage and theoretical sophistication. Titles include: Maurizio Ascari A COUNTER-HISTORY OF CRIME FICTION Supernatural, Gothic, Sensational Pamela Bedore DIME NOVELS AND THE ROOTS OF AMERICAN DETECTIVE FICTION Hans Bertens and Theo D’haen CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN CRIME FICTION Anita Biressi CRIME, FEAR AND THE LAW IN TRUE CRIME STORIES Clare Clarke LATE VICTORIAN CRIME FICTION IN THE SHADOWS OF SHERLOCK Paul Cobley THE AMERICAN THRILLER Generic Innovation and Social Change in the 1970s Michael Cook NARRATIVES OF ENCLOSURE IN DETECTIVE FICTION The Locked Room Mystery Michael Cook DETECTIVE FICTION AND THE GHOST STORY The Haunted Text Barry Forshaw DEATH IN A COLD CLIMATE A Guide to Scandinavian Crime Fiction Barry Forshaw BRITISH CRIME FILM Subverting
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregating the Scare from the Greens
    DISAGGREGATING THE SCARE FROM THE GREENS Lee Hall*† INTRODUCTION When the Vermont Law Review graciously asked me to contribute to this Symposium focusing on the tension between national security and fundamental values, specifically for a segment on ecological and animal- related activism as “the threat of unpopular ideas,” it seemed apt to ask a basic question about the title: Why should we come to think of reverence for life or serious concern for the Earth that sustains us as “unpopular ideas”? What we really appear to be saying is that the methods used, condoned, or promoted by certain people are unpopular. So before we proceed further, intimidation should be disaggregated from respect for the environment and its living inhabitants. Two recent and high-profile law-enforcement initiatives have viewed environmental and animal-advocacy groups as threats in the United States. These initiatives are the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) prosecution and Operation Backfire. The former prosecution targeted SHAC—a campaign to close one animal-testing firm—and referred also to the underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF).1 The latter prosecution *. Legal director of Friends of Animals, an international animal-rights organization founded in 1957. †. Lee Hall, who can be reached at [email protected], thanks Lydia Fiedler, the Vermont Law School, and Friends of Animals for making it possible to participate in the 2008 Symposium and prepare this Article for publication. 1. See Indictment at 14–16, United States v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., No. 3:04-cr-00373-AET-2 (D.N.J. May 27, 2004), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ pdffiles/shacind.pdf (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • How Climate Change Scorched the Nation in 2012
    HOW CLIMATE CHANGE SCORCHED THE NATION IN 2012 NatioNal Wildlife federatioN i. Intro- ductioN Photo: Flickr/woodleywonderworks is climate change ruining our summers? It is certainly altering them in dramatic ways, and rarely for the better. The summer of 2012 has been full of extreme weather events connected to climate change. Heat records have been broken across the country, drought conditions forced the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to make the largest disaster declaration in U.S. history, and wildfires have raged throughout the West. New research by world-renowned climate scientist James Hansen con- firms that the increasingly common extreme weather events across the country, like record heat waves and drought, are linked to climate change.1 This report examines those climate change impacts whose harm is acutely felt in the summer. Heat waves; warming rivers, lakes, and streams; floods; drought; wildfires; and insect and pest infestations are problems we are dealing with this summer and what we are likely to face in future summers. As of August 23rd, 7 MILLION 2/3 of the country has experienced drought this acres of wildlife habitat and communities summer, much of it labeled “severe” 4 have burned in wildfires2 40 20 60 More than July’s average0 continental U.S. temperature 80 -20 113 MILLION 77.6°F100 people in the U.S. were in areas under 3.3°F above-40 the 20th-century average. 3 5 extreme heat advisories as of June 29 This was the-60 warmest month120 on record 0F NatioNal Wildlife federatioN Unfortunately, hot summers like this will occur much more frequently in years ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Environmentalism ~ the Initial Decades a Historical, Documentary Bibliography
    Radical Environmentalism ~ The Initial Decades A Historical, Documentary Bibliography This resource continues to be refined – some links may not be created yet. This bibliography provides a partially annotated, thematic review the central religious, ethical, and political dimensions, and the key historical watersheds, which occurred during the initial decades of the radical environmental movement. It focuses especially on Earth First!, but seeks also to illuminate kindred movements and its splinter group, such as the Earth Liberation Front. The Critique of Western, Industrial Civilization, the Case against Anthropocentrism and Humanism, and “Deep Ecology” as a Proposed Alternative Worldview. Radical environmentalism articulated a comprehensive critique of western civilization, both its religions and philosophical underpinnings as well as its agricultural and industrial modes of production. Soon after Earth First! was founded to advance a biocentric ethics and militant strategy, in early 1982, its founders became acquainted with “deep ecology.” They quickly deep ecology as a convenient trope for their own ethical perspectives. The following articles provide a representative sample of those articulating the radical environmental social critique, fledgling articulation of the alternative worldview and required militant tactics, and manifesto-like calls to action. From the mid-1980s, the articles deal increasingly with tensions in the growing movement, as authors begin criticize and defend aspects deep ecology and radical environmental ideology, as they had been articulated in the early years of Earth First. **Foreman, Dave. "Earth First!" The Progressive 45, no. 10 (October 1981): 39-42. An important manifesto and call for environmental activists to put the Earth First! and take on the earth’s destroyers with direct action resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas J
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Student Theses 2015-Present Environmental Studies Spring 5-15-2016 Controlling What Is Wild: The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas J. Levendosky Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015 Recommended Citation Levendosky, Thomas J., "Controlling What Is Wild: The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism" (2016). Student Theses 2015-Present. 33. https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015/33 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses 2015-Present by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Controlling What Is Wild The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas Levendosky Environmental Studies 4000: Senior Thesis May 15, 2016 1 Abstract This thesis examines the extremist side of the environmental activism commonly known as ecoterrorism, and the subsequent implications of categorizing criminal activism as terrorism. Groups such as Earth First!, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), and the Environmental Liberation Front (ELF) strive to protect the natural world from the detrimental impacts of industrialization. Activists affiliated with these groups endorse direct action against environmentally harmful enterprises. Extremists are motivated by the belief that they are on the frontline defending the defenseless. They hope to dissuade corporations and government agencies from exploiting the natural world by exposing unethical practices and causing economic damage. The strategy of direct action can involve sabotaging of industrial equipment (monkeywrenching), arson, and tree spiking. Direct action also promotes nonviolent protest and civil disobedience to obstruct industrial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Nokill
    Approaching No­Kill: Challenges and Solutions for the Los Angeles Animal Services Department Caroline Nasella April 28, 2006 UEP Comps 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Chapter I: The Players and Politics Behind the LAAS Controversy 9 Chapter II: Methods 20 Chapter III: Animal Shelters and the Companion­Pet Surplus 26 Chapter IV: The Animal Welfare and Liberation Philosophy 39 Chapter V: What is possible: The San Francisco SPCA And Animal Care and Control Facilities 47 Chapter VI: A Policy Analysis of the Los Angeles Animal Services Department 69 Chapter VII: Recommendations 80 Conclusion 86 Bibliography 89 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper is an examination of the Los Angeles Animal Services (LAAS) Department. It looks at the historical, political and philosophical context of the Department. It examines the validity of grievances made by local animal welfare groups against the Department and analyzes the LAAS Department structure and policies. Using a comparative case­study, it identifies the San Francisco animal care facilities as effective models for LAAS. Through an exploration of such themes, this report makes pragmatic policy recommendations for the Department with the goal of lowering shelter euthanasia rates. 3 INTRODUCTION 4 When asked about why activists have targeted LAAS in recent years, cofounder of Animal Defense League – Los Angeles (ADL­LA) Jerry Vlasik argued that the group wanted to focus on one municipal shelter whose reformed policies could translate “throughout the nation”. He believes that if the city goes “no­kill” it will serve as a model for all cities. Vlasik contends that LAAS is not worse than other municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eco-Terrorist Wave (1970-2016)
    THE ECO-TERRORIST WAVE (1970-2016) By João Raphael da Silva Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations Supervisor: Professor Matthijs Bogaards Word Count: Budapest, Hungary 2017 CEU eTD Collection 1 ABSTRACT The present research aims to shed light on the geographical and temporal spread of the ecological typology of terrorism – hereinafter referred as “Eco-Terrorism” – through the lens of the David C. Rapoport’s Wave and Tom Parker and Nick Sitter’s Strain Theories. This typology that has posed high levels of threats to the United States and the European Union member States remains uncovered by these two theoretical frameworks. My arguments are that, first, like many other typologies previously covered by the above-mentioned theories, Eco-Terrorism spread. Second, “Wave”, “Strain” or “Wavy Strain” should be able to explain the pattern followed by Eco-Terrorism. Making use of the “Contagion Effect” as an analytical tool, the present research found that, like in other typologies, as an indirect way of contagion, literary production has played a crucial role in the spread of Eco-Terrorism, with a slight difference on who was writing them. Eventually, they became leaders or members of an organization, but in most of the cases were philosophers and fiction authors. In addition, it was found that the system of organization of the ALF and the ELF contributes to the spread. As a direct way of contagion, aside from training like in other typologies, the spread occurs when members of a certain organization disaffiliate from an organization and found a new one, and sometimes when two organizations act in cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP ECOLOGY Shortly After Founding Earth First!, Foreman and His Comrades Also Immediately Seized on and Adopted Deep Ecology As Earth First!’S Natural Philosophy
    The Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature Bron Taylor, Editor in Chief Continuum International, 2005 Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front Radical Environmentalism comprises a cluster of environmental movements and ideologies that share an overall worldview that includes a perception of the sacredness of nature. The religious and ideological beliefs of these movements, and the criticisms to which they are typically subjected, are described in detail in RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM. Their basic orientation can be, however, briefly characterized: Radical environmental movements trace environmental degradation to anthropocentric and hierarchical western philosophies and religions. They prescribe in response lifestyle simplification, political resistance to the destructive forces, and a spiritual “reconnection” with nature. These responses, they believe, depend on a “resacralization” of human attitudes and perceptions of the natural world. By the early twenty-first century Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) had become the best known of the radical environmental groups in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, and they had established beachheads in scores of countries on every continent but Antarctica. Earth First! Earth First!, with its slogan “no compromise in defense of mother earth,” was founded in 1980. It rapidly became known for its dramatic civil disobedience campaigns and the occasional use of sabotage in its efforts to thwart commercial incursions into biologically sensitive lands. In its first two decades it focused especially upon North America’s remaining old-growth forests, evocatively labeled “ancient” or “cathedral” forests to reinforce their special importance. Dave Foreman, who left the WILDERNESS SOCIETY after he became disenchanted with the efforts of such mainstream environmental groups to arrest environmental decline, was the most charismatic leader among Earth First!’s co-founders (variously numbered at 4 or 5, depending on differing movement origin myths).
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Credit Unclaimed ADAMS HENRY AIKEN WAYNE
    Capital Credit Unclaimed ADAMS HENRY AIKEN WAYNE A J WALKER CONST CO ADAMS HOWARD L AIKMAN RUTH ABBOTT BENNIE O ADAMS JACK AIRCALL COMM INC ABBOTT DONALD E ADAMS JESSIE AIRHART FRANK D ABBOTT DONNA ADAMS JOHN F AIRPORT STEAKHOUSE ABBOTT E H ADAMS KEN AKERS EVERETT L ABBOTT GLADYS ADAMS KENNETH R AKERS MARY E ABBOTT GUS ADAMS LARRY K AKERS PETE ABBOTT J H ADAMS LEMMA L AKERS R H ABBOTT PAUL ADAMS ROBERT E AKERS ROBERT JR ABBOTT TED ADAMS ROBERT S AKERS RUBY ABBOTT VETA ADAMS RONALD AKERS STEPHEN G ABBY DEBBIE ADAMS THOMAS W AKERS THORNTO J R ABEGGLEN JAMES S ADAMS VERONICA AKIN PAULINE ABEL DOROTHY ADAMS ZOLA AKINS & HOOD PARTNERS ABELL D F ADCOCK KENNETH L ALBERT DAVID ABELL WILLIAM E ADCOCK M C ALBERT STEVEN E ABERNATHY LAUREL ADDAE MAX ALDERSON ROBERT W ABSHER GREG C ADDIS DEAN ALDRIDGE LEO J ABSTON ARTHUR ADEN HARM H ALESHIRE DELPHIA ACKERET EDWARD A ADKINS C G ALESHIRE DORIS ACKERMAN ALVIN H ADKINS GARY L ALESHIRE EDNA ACS GARDEN CENTER ADKINS HELEN J ALESHIRE OWEN C ADAIR MADONNA F ADKINS JOE L ALESHIRE RALPH ADAIR RANDALL E ADKINS MARK ALEXANDER ALICE S ADAIR SARA ADKINS NORMAN ALEXANDER BARRY ADAMS CHARLES J ADKINS WILLIAM M ALEXANDER CARSON T ADAMS DARRELL L ADRIAN ROY ALEXANDER DENNIS ADAMS DORIS M ADRIAN WILLIAM ALEXANDER HAROLD ADAMS F M AGERS CLARE A ALEXANDER HELEN B ADAMS H L AGERS IDA ALEXANDER JOHN R ADAMS HARRY AGNEW JAMES C ALEXANDER R C ADAMS HARRY J AGRICO CHEMICAL CO ALEY BILL E AHRENDTS DONALD ALFACORN CORP ALFORD HASTON ALLING TIM ANDERSON DEBORAH ALHASSAN MICHAEL ALLISON CHARLES W ANDERSON DENNIS ALI MOHAMMEY ALLISON
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]