The Struggle Against Redlining in Washington, DC, 1970-1995

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Struggle Against Redlining in Washington, DC, 1970-1995 Community Development, Research, and Reinvestment: The Struggle against Redlining in Washington, DC, 1970-1995 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts James M. Lloyd December 2012 © 2012 James M. Lloyd. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Community Development, Research, and Reinvestment: The Struggle against Redlining in Washington, DC, 1970-1995 by JAMES M. LLOYD has been approved for the Department of Geography and the College of Arts and Sciences by Geoffrey L. Buckley Professor of Geography Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract LLOYD, JAMES M., M.A., December 2012, Geography Community Development, Research, and Reinvestment: The Struggle against Redlining in Washington, DC, 1970-1995 Director of Thesis: Geoffrey L. Buckley Using archival data and oral histories, I describe the community reinvestment movement in Washington, DC from 1970 until 1985. Though the movement began as isolated private advocacy in the early 1970s, it helped pass key pieces of federal legislation, such as the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) and the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Additionally, DC’s reinvestment movement is unusual in that the city government used an interstate banking law to force reinvestment. Furthermore, I describe class-based barriers to reinvestment within the African American community and the community development and reinvestment struggle of the Adams Morgan Organization in the late ‘70s. I conclude with a discussion of how advocacy and research led to reinvestment because of successful venue-shopping and scale-jumping. This work fills specific gaps in the literature, to include DC’s role in the writing of CRA and HMDA, qualitative evidence of the effects of redlining, the use of interstate banking laws for reinvestment, and class issues within the African American community in the context of reinvestment. 4 This thesis is dedicated to the memory of Professor Robert Michael Lloyd, 1938-1994. 5 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Geoffrey L. Buckley, for his valuable guidance and assistance in finding a topic, executing the thesis, and navigating graduate school. Additionally, I would like to thank the members of my committee: Associate Professor Yeong-Hyun Kim for her assistance throughout the proposal and defense process; and Associate Professor Harold Perkins who provided extensive advice regarding theory and was very flexible in allowing me to use course assignments to aid in thesis writing. I would like to thank my respondents: Dr. Frank Smith, Professor Robert Stumberg, Esq., Mr. Gerard Dunphy, and Mr. James Vitarello, Esq.; their contributions were invaluable. Additionally, I would like to thank the kind staffs of the Washingtoniana Collection at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Library of Washington, DC, Alden Library at Ohio University, and the National Archives, in addition to their respective parent institutions. For providing me accommodations during my fieldwork, I would like to thank Mr. Franz Hardin Misch and Mrs. Mary Gregg Misch of Arlington, VA and Mr. William Charles Schubert of Washington, DC. And for their continued support of research on the geographies of Baltimore and Washington, I would like to thank Dr. J. Morgan Grove of the US Forest Service and Dean Ali Whitmer of Georgetown University. I would like to thank the faculty and staff at the Ohio University Department of Geography for enabling graduate students to complete master’s degrees in an appropriate period of time without undue financial stress. Compared to other departments at other 6 institutions, Ohio’s Geography Department is extraordinary in its approach. Furthermore, I would like to thank the State of Ohio and Ohio University for funding the teaching assistantship that gave me the wherewithal to pursue graduate work. Additional thanks go to those whose friendship provided valued support throughout the research and writing process: Ms. Angela Hood, Ms. Jessica Bilecki, and Mr. Andrew Fink. The greatest thanks, however, go to my mother, Dr. Theodora Lee Gregg, whose extensive assistance allowed me to finish this degree in accelerated fashion. Furthermore, her experience in higher education and advice provided therefrom gave me a distinct advantage in negotiating graduate school. 7 Table of Contents Page Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 3! Dedication ....................................................................................................................... 4! Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... 5! List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 8! List of Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................. 9! Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................. 10! Chapter 2: Background and Literature Review ............................................................ 13! Redlining ............................................................................................................. 13! Reinvestment and Community Development ...................................................... 21! Redlining and Capitalism .................................................................................... 38! Gentrification ....................................................................................................... 44! Gaps ..................................................................................................................... 46! Chapter 3: Methods and Data ....................................................................................... 48! Research Questions ............................................................................................. 48! Archival Research ............................................................................................... 48! Oral Histories ...................................................................................................... 55! Timeline and Analysis ......................................................................................... 65! Chapter 4: Results and Discussion ................................................................................ 68! Context ................................................................................................................ 68! Evidence of Redlining ......................................................................................... 70! Researchers and Public Advocacy: Reinvestment in the 1970s .......................... 75! Politics of Scale and Venue Shopping ................................................................. 92! Money Talks: Interstate Banking and Reinvestment, 1982-1988 ..................... 108! Appraisal and Enforcement: Reinvestment from 1988 to 1995 ........................ 114! Federal Impact on DC in the Early ‘90s ............................................................ 124! Gentrification and Community Development ................................................... 126! Housing Counseling .......................................................................................... 133! Adams-Morgan Organization, Perpetual, and Gentrification ............................ 137! Chapter 5: Conclusion ................................................................................................ 150! Works Cited ................................................................................................................ 160! 8 List of Figures Page Figure 1. Map of District of Columbia ......................................................................... 52 Figure 2. Distribution of Mortgage Loans, 1973. ......................................................... 82 Figure 3. Front cover of 1975 DC PIRG report on redlining in Washington, DC ....... 84 Figure 4. Industrial Bank on U Street NW. Photo by author, January 2012 .............. 106 Figure 5. The Reverend Baysie Gallimore moves back into his Seaton Street home 143 Figure 6. Flow Chart – Non-profit advocacy leads indirectly to reinvestment .......... 151 9 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym Meaning ACORN Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now ACTION-Housing Allegheny Council to Improve Our Neighborhoods- Housing AEDC Anacostia Economic Development Corporation AMO Adams-Morgan Organization AMTPA Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act CBCC Central Brooklyn Coordinating Council CCC Center for Community Change CDC Community Development Corporation CRA Community Reinvestment Act CRMI Commission on Residential Mortgage Investment DC District of Columbia DC PIRG District of Columbia Public Interest Research Group DIDMCA Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act DOJ US Department of Justice ECOA Equal Credit Opportunity Act FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FFIEC Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council FHA Federal Housing Administration FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank FHLBB Federal Home Loan Bank Board FIRREA Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act FNU First Name Unknown GAO US Government Accountability Office HMDA Home Mortgage Disclosure Act HOLC Home Owners Loan
Recommended publications
  • Jews and African Americans: Slavery, Diaspora, Ghetto
    University of California at San Diego Jews and African Americans: Slavery, Diaspora, Ghetto HITO 136 Fall 2018 Professor Deborah Hertz HSS 6024 Please refrain from emailing me unless it is an emergency. Better to catch me after class. In an absolute emergency contact me at [email protected]. Class meets Tuesdays and Thursdays from 12:30 to 1:50 in Pepper Canyon Hall 121 Office hours: Tuesdays 10-11:30 in HSS 6024 and by appointment. Class web site can be found on Triton Ed. Power Point slides will be posted up shortly before the class meets on Tuesday and Thursday mornings. You will be writing short blogs on the Discussion Forum. Check your UCSD email regularly as I often send reminder emails to the entire class. Manners in the Classroom. Please come to class on time and do not leave class before the class is over. If you must leave early, kindly let the instructor know before class begins and sit near the back. Although our class meets over the lunch hour, please do not eat during class, although it is fine to drink liquids. Attendance will not be taken but the sight of empty seats is extremely distressing to the instructor. No clickers!!! 1 Readings can be found in various places, in paper and digital form. All of the assigned texts have been ordered at the Price Center Bookstore and are also on reserve at the Library. The Reader for the class can be purchased in the bookstore and several copies of the Reader are also on reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with Myspace and Facebook.” in Race After the Internet (Eds
    CITATION: boyd, danah. (2011). “White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with MySpace and Facebook.” In Race After the Internet (eds. Lisa Nakamura and Peter A. Chow-White). Routledge, pp. 203-222. White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with MySpace and Facebook danah boyd Microsoft Research and HarVard Berkman Center for Internet and Society http://www.danah.org/ In a historic small town outside Boston, I interViewed a group of teens at a small charter school that included middle-class students seeking an alternative to the public school and poorer students who were struggling in traditional schools. There, I met Kat, a white 14-year-old from a comfortable background. We were talking about the social media practices of her classmates when I asked her why most of her friends were moVing from MySpace to Facebook. Kat grew noticeably uncomfortable. She began simply, noting that “MySpace is just old now and it’s boring.” But then she paused, looked down at the table, and continued. “It’s not really racist, but I guess you could say that. I’m not really into racism, but I think that MySpace now is more like ghetto or whatever.” – Kat On that spring day in 2007, Kat helped me finally understand a pattern that I had been noticing throughout that school year. Teen preference for MySpace or 1 Feedback welcome! [email protected] CITATION: boyd, danah. (2011). “White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with MySpace and Facebook.” In Race After the Internet (eds.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Risk, and Real Estate in the Development of the Home Ownership State
    Risky Business: Race, Risk, and Real Estate in the Development of the Home Ownership State by Amanda R. Tillotson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Social Work and Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor John E. Tropman, Co-Chair Associate Professor Robert W. Mickey, Co-Chair Professor Nancy E. Burns Associate Professor Karen M. Staller DEDICATION To my children and their families ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The process of completing this dissertation has been fraught, and it ultimately was possible only because I received a great deal of assistance. I would like to thank John Tropman, Laura Lein, Rob Mickey, and Berit Ingersoll Dayton for convincing me that it might be possible to accomplish this, after all. I am grateful to John Tropman, Karen Staller, Rob Mickey, and Nancy Burns for insightful comments along the way. Mariah Zeisberg, Hanes Walton Jr. and Mary Corcoran also provided excellent comments and encouragement at various stages. Fellow participants on panels at the American Political Science Association, the Midwestern Political Science Association, the Political Theory workshop and the American History Workshop at the University of Michigan, and the Race, Law and History Seminar at the University of Michigan Law School made helpful comments on various iterations of this work, as did referees for the DePaul Journal for Social Justice. I first became interested in the idea of risk as a result of reading Freaks of Fortune by Jonathan Levy, and this book has continued to inform my thinking. My interest in issues of race and property was spurred by discussions in Thomas Green’s seminar on inequality at the University of Michigan Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Housing Choice Report
    Regional Section February 2012 BALTIMORE METRO AREA ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 2. REGIONAL PROFILE ...................................................................... 4 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 4 II. Regional Overview .................................................................................................... 6 III. Demographic Profile ................................................................................................. 6 a. Population Trends ....................................................................................................... 6 b. Areas of Racial and Ethnic Minority Concentration ..................................................... 8 c. Residential Segregation Patterns ............................................................................... 9 d. Persons with Limited English Proficiency .................................................................. 10 IV. Economic Profile ..................................................................................................... 12 a. Race/Ethnicity and Income ....................................................................................... 12 b. Concentrations of LMI Persons ................................................................................. 14 c. Disability and Income ................................................................................................ 14 d. Familial Status and Income ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lending in the Modern Era: Does Racial Composition of Neighborhoods Matter When Individuals Seek Home Financing? a Pilot Study in New England
    Lending in the Modern Era: Does Racial Composition of Neighborhoods Matter When Individuals Seek Home Financing? A Pilot Study in New England Meghan Kuebler* Department of Sociology, University at Albany, State University of New York This article explores the relationship between racial composition of neighborhoods and approval and origination of mortgages. It measures independent neighborhood effects, above and beyond applicant race effects preceding the recent housing mar- ket crisis for rental and owner-occupied homes. Mortgage applications are selected from the dozen most populated metropolitan areas in New England. Applications are linked to corresponding neighborhood data and generalized linear mixed mod- eling is applied. Data include prehousing market crash Housing Mortgage Disclo- sure Act data matched to American Community Survey 5-year data for over one mil- lion applications. Findings indicate, although controlling for income, gender, and race of the applicant, poverty and tenure, and additional socioeconomic variables, neighborhood racial composition has a statistically significant effect on whether mort- gages are approved and originated. Minority presence is correlated with a negative effect on mortgage origination regardless of race of the individual loan applicant. More specifically, whites’ applications are also turned down in minority neighbor- hoods, especially black neighborhoods. INTRODUCTION The recent housing foreclosure crisis warrants further investigation into lending practices and the criteria by which mortgage credit is issued (Rugh and Massey, 2010). Research is lacking on the mortgage crisis at the neighborhood level (Vesselinov and Beveridge, 2011). Minority neighborhoods were disproportionately affected by the housing market crash, meriting inquiry into lending patterns leading up to this tumultuous economic pe- riod (Spader and Quercia, 2008; Vesselinov and Beveridge, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconic Ghetto, Color-Blind Racism and White Masculinities: a Content and Discourse Analysis of Black Twitter On
    JULIEN, CHRISTOPHER M., M.A. The Iconic Ghetto, Color-Blind Racism and White Masculinities: A Content and Discourse Analysis of Black Twitter on www.Imgur.com. (2017) Directed by Dr. Steven Kroll-Smith. 202 pp. In this research, I investigate Black Twitter on www.Imgur.com. I identify the general contours of Black Twitter images on Imgur as well as the reception and response to this content by the individuals who use this website. I first categorize the images of Black Twitter in order to describe their main features. Second, I describe the various ways that the individuals on Imgur respond to Black Twitter through a thematic content analysis and critical discourse analysis of the written comments. I conclude that Black Twitter on Imgur reproduces the same racist stereotypes that have been present in decades of media coverage of African Americans in the United States. Furthermore, the responses of individuals on Imgur to Black Twitter evidence anti-Ebonics ideologies, SIDE theory for group identity and participation, and the ongoing development of competing white, masculine identities in a color-blind space. THE ICONIC GHETTO, COLOR-BLIND RACISM AND WHITE MASCULINITIES: A CONTENT AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF BLACK TWITTER ON WWW.IMGUR.COM by Christopher M. Julien A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Greensboro 2017 Approved by Committee Chair To my wife, Nicole, my constant companion through trials and triumphs, who encourages and believes in me, even when I do not.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Segregation and Housing Discrimination in the United States
    RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION AND HOUSING DISCRIMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES Violations of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination A Response to the 2007 Periodic Report of the United States of America Submitted by Housing Scholars and Research and Advocacy Organizations December 2007 PREPARED BY: Michael B. de Leeuw, Megan K. Whyte, Dale Ho, Catherine Meza, and Alexis Karteron of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, with significant assistance from members of our working group, and especially Philip Tegeler of the Poverty & Race Research Action Council and Sara Pratt on behalf of the National Fair Housing Alliance. We are also grateful for the assistance of Myron Orfield, John Goering, and Gregory Squires. * SUBMITTED BY Poverty & Race Research Action Council, Washington, DC National Fair Housing Alliance, Washington, DC National Low Income Housing Coalition, Washington, DC NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., New York, NY Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty, Washington, DC Center for Responsible Lending, Durham, NC Center for Social Inclusion, New York, NY Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race & Ethnicity, Columbus, OH Human Rights Center, University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis, MN Institute on Race & Poverty, University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis, MN Center for Civil Rights, University of North Carolina Law School, Chapel Hill, NC ACLU of Maryland Fair Housing Project, Baltimore, MD Inclusive Communities Project, Dallas, TX New Jersey Regional Coalition, Cherry Hill, NJ Fair Share Housing Center, Cherry Hill, NJ Michelle Adams, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law William Apgar, Harvard University Hilary Botein, Baruch College, City University of New York Sheryll Cashin, Georgetown University Law Center Camille Z.
    [Show full text]
  • CRIME and VIOLENCE in CHICAGO a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage
    CRIME AND VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage Tim van den Bergh - Master Thesis Human Geography Radboud University, 2018 i Crime and Violence in Chicago: a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage Tim van den Bergh Student number: 4554817 Radboud University Nijmegen Master Thesis Human Geography Master Specialization: ‘Conflicts, Territories and Identities’ Supervisor: dr. O.T Kramsch Nijmegen, 2018 ii ABSTRACT Tim van den Bergh: Crime and Violence in Chicago: a Geography of Segregation and Structural Disadvantage Engaged with the socio-historical making of space, this thesis frames the contentious debate on violence in Chicago by illustrating how a set of urban processes have interacted to maintain a geography of racialized structural disadvantage. Within this geography, both favorable and unfavorable social conditions are unequally dispersed throughout the city, thereby impacting neighborhoods and communities differently. The theoretical underpinning of space as a social construct provides agency to particular institutions that are responsible for the ‘making’ of urban space in Chicago. With the use of a qualitative research approach, this thesis emphasizes the voices of people who can speak about the etiology of crime and violence from personal experience. Furthermore, this thesis provides a critique of social disorganization and broken windows theory, proposing that these popular criminologies have advanced a problematic normative production of space and impeded effective crime policy and community-police relations. Key words: space, disadvantage, race, crime & violence, Chicago (Under the direction of dr. Olivier Kramsch) iii Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 § 1.1 Studying crime and violence in Chicago .................................................................... 1 § 1.2 Research objective ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jpmorgan Chase &
    SKADDEN,ARPS,SLATE,MEAGHER &FLOM LLP 1440 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. FIRM/AFFILIATE OFFICES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-2111 ----------- ________ BOSTON CHICAGO TEL: (202) 371-7000 HOUSTON LOS ANGELES FAX: (202) 393-5760 NEW YORK www.skadden.com PALO ALTO WILMINGTON DIRECT DIAL ----------- 202-371-7180 BEIJING DIRECT FAX BRUSSELS 202-661-9010 FRANKFURT EMAIL ADDRESS HONG KONG [email protected] LONDON MOSCOW MUNICH PARIS SÃO PAULO SEOUL February 16, 2021 SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO TORONTO BY EMAIL ([email protected]) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Office of Chief Counsel 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: JPMorgan Chase & Co. – 2021 Annual Meeting Supplement to Letter dated January 11, 2021 Relating to Shareholder Proposal Submitted by CtW Investment Group Ladies and Gentlemen: We refer to our letter dated January 11, 2021 (the “No-Action Request”), submitted on behalf of JPMorgan Chase & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to which we requested that the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) concur with the Company’s view that the shareholder proposal and supporting statement (the “Proposal”) submitted by CtW Investment Group (the “Proponent”) may be excluded from its proxy materials for the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2021 Annual Meeting”). This letter is in response to the letter to the Staff, dated January 29, 2021, submitted on behalf of the Proponent (the “Proponent’s Letter”), and supplements the No-Action Request. In accordance with Rule 14a-8(j), a copy of this letter also is being sent to the Proponent.
    [Show full text]
  • What We Know About Mortgage Lending Discrimination in America
    WIlT WE KNOW IIOUT MIRTIIIE LENIIIG IlseR11I111T111 IN ERICA SaPl8D1bar 1999 1.1.81"""1111111.. aod Urban DIII.e.maDI A.__ WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT MORTGAGE LENDING DISCRIMINATION IN AMERICA HUD-8765-3 WHAT WE KNOW bOUT MOITGAGE LENDING DISCIIIINATION INIIERICA SEPTEIBER 1999 SIll_hied II: I.s. DepadlDent ollousll._ld Urban DevellP_eat Imce.' 'allev D_I...elt lId lesearch h lbe IrbaalnstltUte Wasbinatan. D.C. Maraen Austin Tumer Jlbl Yllller StIPbl1 IISS Kenlelb Tell.... Dille illig David lIvine .11111 Bass Slnllh Mlcblile Delair C.ltnctI •. c-I'W929 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Felicity Skidmore for her many.contributions to both the design and the synthesis of this research project. She has been a source ofboth intellectual insight and common sense at every stage of our work, helping us organize and rationalize findings from its various components, and drafting major portions of this report. George Galster also made valuable contributions as adviser and reviewer for all phases of the'project, and has helped ensure the technical quality and integrity of our work. We also thank four individuals who reviewed draft versions of the analyses upon which this report is based. Kathy Cloud, of the National Fair Housing Alliance, reviewed our re-analysis of paired testing data; Anthony Yezer, of the George Washington University and Geoffrey Tootell, of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, provide,d valuable comments on our review and re-analysis of the existing statistical literature; and David Listokin, of Rutgers University, reviewed our case study analysis of a mortgage lending institution. All of these technical reviewers challenged our assumptions and pushed us to advance our thinking on critical issues.
    [Show full text]
  • A Path to Housing Justice in California Facing History, Uprooting Inequality: a Path to Housing Justice in California
    Facing History, Uprooting Inequality: A Path to Housing Justice in California Facing History, Uprooting Inequality: A Path to Housing Justice in California Amee Chew with Chione Lucina Muñoz Flegal About This Report This report was produced by PolicyLink with funding from the Melville Charitable Trust. Acknowledgments We are deeply grateful to our community partners who served We thank Michelle Huang at PolicyLink and the USC Equity on the Advisory Committee of this report, for their expertise, Research Institute for data analysis; Heather Tamir at PolicyLink guidance, and insights: for editorial support; Jacob Goolkasian for layout and design; Guadalupe Garcia for logistical support; and Kakuna Kerina for • Alexandra Suh and José Roberto Hernández, Koreatown thorough copyedits. Immigrant Workers Alliance • Anya Lawler and Alexander Harnden, Western Center on We are grateful to the Melville Charitable Trust for supporting Law and Poverty this project. • Ashley Werner, Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability • Camilo Sol Zamora and Cat Kung, Causa Justa :: Just Cause • Christina Livingston, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment • Cynthia Strathmann, Strategic Actions for a Just Economy • D’Artagnan Scorza and Jelani Hendrix, Uplift Inglewood and Social Justice Learning Institute ©2020 PolicyLink. All rights reserved. • Deborah Thrope and Mariel Block, National Housing Law Project Cover, lower left: In 1963, hundreds of NAACP-CORE members • Jennifer Martinez, PICO California and supporters march in Torrance for fair
    [Show full text]
  • The New White Flight
    WILSON_MACROS (DO NOT DELETE) 5/16/2019 3:53 PM THE NEW WHITE FLIGHT ERIKA K. WILSON* ABSTRACT White charter school enclaves—defined as charter schools located in school districts that are thirty percent or less white, but that enroll a student body that is fifty percent or greater white— are emerging across the country. The emergence of white charter school enclaves is the result of a sobering and ugly truth: when given a choice, white parents as a collective tend to choose racially segregated, predominately white schools. Empirical research supports this claim. Empirical research also demonstrates that white parents as a collective will make that choice even when presented with the option of a more racially diverse school that is of good academic quality. Despite the connection between collective white parental choice and school segregation, greater choice continues to be injected into the school assignment process. School choice assignment policies, particularly charter schools, are proliferating at a substantial rate. As a result, parental choice rather than systemic design is creating new patterns of racial segregation and inequality in public schools. Yet the Supreme Court’s school desegregation jurisprudence insulates racial segregation in schools ostensibly caused by parental choice rather than systemic design from regulation. Consequently, the new patterns of racial segregation in public schools caused by collective white parental choice largely escapes regulation by courts. This article argues that the time has come to reconsider the legal and normative viability of regulating racial segregation in public Copyright © 2019 Erika K. Wilson. * Thomas Willis Lambeth Distinguished Chair in Public Policy, Associate Professor of Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
    [Show full text]