Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 25:39-52. ISSN 1836-5698 39(Print) Published 25 May 2015. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Best Practices in herpetology: Hinrich Kaiser’s claims are unsubstantiated. Raymond T. Hoser Snakebusters, PO Box 599, Doncaster, Victoria, 3108, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail:
[email protected] Received 2 July 2014, Accepted 1 May 2015, Published 25 May 2015. ABSTRACT In 2013, Kaiser et. al. published in Herpetological Review a lengthy blog calling for other herpetologists not to use names formally proposed by myself (Raymond Hoser) and other herpetologists from the period 2000 onwards. This document (Kaiser et al. 2013), was a rehash of another, sent to herpetologists worldwide a year earlier (Kaiser 2012a and 2012b), which in 2012 Kaiser stated had been written by Wüster et al. (Kaiser 2012a). Both blogs were discredited in succession by Hoser (2012) and Hoser (2013). Kaiser et al. sought (and still seek) to step outside of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (“The Code”, “Zoological Rules” or “Zoological Code”) (Ride et al. 1999) and breach the three most important rules being: 1/ Homonymy (Principal 5, Article 52 and elsewhere), 2/ Priority (Principal 3, Article 23 and elsewhere), 3/ Stability (Principal 4, Articles 23, 65 and elsewhere), as well as the ethics of the Code (Appendix A) and numerous other sections of the document. Notwithstanding this, Kaiser (2014a) repeated many of his false claims and for the purposes of rebuttal, one need look no further than Hoser (2013). More recently Kaiser (2014b) proposed in an 11 page blog published in Herpetological Review that the ICZN should use their plenary powers to rule all Hoser names ever published (dating from 1998) as unavailable under the Zoological Code but in the absence of any proper formal submission.