DOCSLIB.ORG

Glatzer Pamphlet Collection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Glatzer Pamphlet Collection Glatzer Pamphlet Collection Convention used in translitteration: Consonants alef = @ lamed = l bet = b or v mem = m gimel = g nun = n dalet = d samekh = s he = h ain = % waw = .v pe = p or f zain = z tsade = ts het = .h kof = .k tet = .t resh = r yod = y sin = .s kaf = k or kh shin = sh taw = t (`s in Yiddish) Vowals (only when the Hebrew text is vocalized, otherwize vowel letters are tranlitterated as consonants). patah = a tsere = e kamets = a or o hirek = i segol = e holem = o kibuts = u shurek = u sewa = e hatef patah = a hatef segol = e hatef kamets = o double yod = ay Box/Folder # Box 1 I. Gershom Scholem I. Materials written by GS A. Offprints and Articles, English #1/1 1. “The curious history of the six pointed star.” Commentary (December 1949) (1). 2. “Jews and Germans.” A Commentary Report, Commentary (1966) (1). 3. “In Search of Sabbatai Zevi.” Haddasah (June 1961) (1). 4. “Jewish Theology Today.” The Center Magazine (1). 5. Shdemot (Spring 1975 N. 3) (1). 6. “Gershom Scholem on Agnon, Part II.” Ariel (1) B. Offprints and Articles, German #1/2 1. “Gut und Böse in der Kabbala.” Eranus-Jahrbuch, vol. 30(1962) (1). 2. “Nach Der Vertreibung Aus Spanien.” and selected articles(1933/34) (1). 3. “Politik der Mystik.” Jüdischen Rundscahu (n. 57) (1). 4. “Über einen Roman von S.J. Agnon, Neue Rundschau (vol. 76, pt. 2, 1965) (1). 5. “Zehn unhistorische Sätze über Kabbala.” Geist und Werk (1958) (1). 6. “David ben Abraham ha-labhan - ein unbekannter jüdischer Mystiker.” Occident and Orient 7. “Zür Literatur der letzten Kabbalisten in Deutschland.” In Zwei Welten: Siegfreid Moses Zum 75. Geburtstag (1962) (1). 8. “Kabbala.” Encyclopaedia Judaica, vol. 9.(1932) (1). 9. “Kabbala Forschug und juedische Geschichtsschreibung in der Universitaet Jerusalem.” Mitteilungsblatt der Hitachduth Olej Germania (May 1937) (1). 10.”Vulliasuds Übersetzung des Sifra Di-Zeniutha aus dem Sohar und andere neuere Literatur zur Geschichte der Kabbala.” (1). C. Offprints and Articles, Hebrew #1/3 1. “Hykhn mt shvty tsvy,” Grshm Shl.vm (1). 2. “Sh.tr hht.kshr.vt shl tlmydy h@ry.,” Grshm Shl.vm, Tsy.vn vol. 5 no. 2(1). 3. “H@m ntglh %zb.vn hs.vd.vt shl @v.v @hr.vn hBvly?,” m@t Grshm Shl.vm, Trbyts (1963) (1). 4. “‘Tsmy.ht .Krn Bn-D.vd,’ m.k.vr .hdsh mr@shyt ymy kt hdonmh [email protected],” m@t Grshm Shl.vm, Trbyts (1963)(1). 5. “Mt.vkh hrh.vrym %l .hkhmt Y.sr@l,” Grsh.vm Shl.vm, .Hkhmt Y.sr@l (1). 6. “M.hvr.v shl hm@mr hmz.vyyf blsh.vn s. hzhr bd.vr.v shl r. @vrhm Hl.vy; r. Y.vsf N. Shrg@ @.v R. D.vd [email protected],” m@t Grshm Shl.vm (1). 7. “L%nyn r. Y.sr@l lyyvl .vf.vlm.vs.v ngd h.hsyd.vt,” Grshm Shl.vm, (1955) (1). 8. “Pyr.vsh [email protected] lHll,” Grshm shl.vm, Sefer Hy.vvl lYts.h.k B%r (1961)(1). 9. “Dm.vt.v hhys.t.vryt shl r. Y.sr@l B%r Shm .T.vv,” Grshm Shl.vm, M.vld (1960)(1). 10. “(2). 11. “A Frankist Commentary to Hallel.” by Gershom Scholem (in Hebrew) reprint from I.F. Baer Jubilee Volume (1960) (1). 12. Article without a title by Grshm Shl.vm (1). 13. “Dr.vsh %l [email protected] lrvy Shlmh lvyt .T.vry@l,” Grshm Shl.vm, Sf.vn.vt (1957)(1). 14. “Shny m.k.vr.vt .hdshym lydy%t t.vrt.v shl @vrhm Mykh@l [email protected],” Grshm Shl.vm, Sf.vn.vt (1960)(1). 15. “T%.vdh .hdshh mr@shyt htn.v%h hshvt@yt,” m@t Grshm Shl.vm (1). 16. “.K.vn.trys mr@shyt ymyh shl kht hd.vnmh [email protected],” Grshm Shl.vm, Zkhr.vn lYts.k.h Bn-Tsvy zl. (1965)(2). 17. “R%y.vn [email protected] b.kblh,” m@t Grshm Shl.vm (1946)(1). 18. “Lt.vld.vt hm.k.vbl r. Y%.kv Tsm.h .vf%.vlt.v hsfr.vtyt,” m@t Grshm Shl.vm (1). 19. “Htsy.t.t [email protected] mn hmdrsh hn%lm,” m@t G. Shl.vm (1). 20. “L.k.v.t.vt lbybly.vgrafyh shl h.kblh,” m@t Grshm Shl.vm, .Kryt Sfr 30 (1). 21. “H%r.vt @.hd.vt [email protected] shl Dr. Znh %l R. Y%.kv Tsm.h,” m@t Grshm Shl.vm, .Kryt Sfr vol. 27 (1). 22. Mts.vh hb@h b%vrh, m@t Grshm Shl.vm (1937) (1). 23. “M.k.vr.vty.v shl ‘M%shh rby Gdy@l Htyn.v.k’ bsfr.vt h.kblh,” Grshm Shl.vm, L%gn.vn Shy (1959) (1). 24. Sefer htmr [email protected] @fl.h hsr.ks.ty, Grshm Shl.vm (1926) (1). II. Materials written by NNG A. Offprints and Articles, English #1/4 1. “Review of G. S., Major Trends In Jewish sMysticim Jewish Education (Jan. 1945) (1). III. Materials written by others A. Offprints and Articles, English #1/5 1.”The Achievement of Gershom Scholem.” Commentary (April 1973) (1). 2.”Eichmann in Jerusalem.” Economist (January 1964) (1). 3.”Gershom Scholem and the Fate of the Jews.” Daedalus (April 14, 1977) (1). 4.”Survey of Current Theological Literature.” Judaism (Winter 1961) (1). 5.”The Achievement of Gershom Scholem.” Commentary (April 7, 1973) (1). #1/6 6.”Books.” The New Yorker (October 22, 1973) (1). 7.”Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism.” The Journal of Philosophy (April 19, 1943) (1). 8.”Das Karka - Bild Gershom Scholems”, Merkur (1979) (1) B. Offprints and Articles, German #1/7 1. “An Gerhard Scholem.” Briefe, 1966 (1). 2. “Reste neuplatonischer Spekulation in der Mystik der deutschen Chassidim und ihre Vermittlung durch Abraham bar Chija.” Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenscaft des Judentums.” (1931) 3. “Das Kafka-Bild Gershom Scholems,” Merkur (1979) (1). C. Offprints and Articles, Hebrew #1/8 1. “%m Grshm Shl.vm,” (October 6, 1974) (1). 2. “Dr. Y.v.hnn L.vy Zl. 1901-1945,”; Memorial Address by J.L Magnes, M. Schwabe, G. Scholem (November 18, 1945) (1). (1). 3. “Grshm Shl.vm %l .Hyn.vkh lyhd.vt,” Btf.vts.vt hg.vlh (1963)(1). D. Offprints and Articles, French #1/9 1. “Romanica et Occidentalia.” In Etudes dédiés á la memoire de Hiram Peri, edited by Moshé Lazar (1963) (1). E. Newspapers, English #1/10 1. “A friendship and its flaws.” Biography and Memoirs (1). 2.”Gershom Scholem.” AM Review (November 20, 1980) (1). 3. “The Mystic Explorer.” New York Times Book Review (September 21, 1980) (1). 4.”Mysticism, other facets of Jewish life reflected in Jewish Book Awards, The JWB Circle (July 1980) (1). 5.”Scholem defines aspects of Jewish Mysticism.” Spectrum ( November 19, 1975) (2). 6.”Student of the Kabbalah.” New York Times Book Review (July 29, 1979) (1). 7.”There is mystery in the world.” Shdemot (October 6, 1974) (2). 8. “The Threat of Messianism: An interview with Gershom Scholem.” The New York Review (August 14, 1980) (2). 9. “Scholem’s house of Zion,” (1). F. Newspapers, German #1/11 1. “Ein Briefwechsel über Hannah Arendts Buch.”: zwischen Prof. Gershom Gerhard Scholem und Hannah Arendt.” MB (August 16, 1963) (1). 2. “Gershom Scholem zum 75. Geburtsag.” MB (December 8, 1972) (1). 3. “G. Scholem über die Anfange der jüdischen Mystik.” (April 16-21 1961) (1). G. Newspapers, Hebrew #1/12 1.”Grsh.vm Shl.vm,” Sh. Y. %gn.vn, (December 22, 1957) (1). H. Unbound copy of Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (1). Box 2 I. Roman Period A. Offprints and Articles, English #2/1 1. “Comparisons and Identifications of Rulers with Deities in the Hellenisitic Period.” Review of Religion (November 1948) (1). 2. “The First Christian Century as Jewish History.” The Bible in Modern Scholarship (1965) (1). 3. “A Hoard of Coins of John Hyrcanus.” Jewish Quarterly Review (January 1947) (1). 4. “Jewish Sects During The Second Commonwealth.” Encyclopaedia Britannica (1963) (1). 5. “The Nautre of the Great Synagogue.” Harvard Theological Review (1967) (1). 6. “The Rabbinic Traditions about the Pharisees in Modern Historiography.” Central Conference of American Rabbis Journal (April 1972) (1). 7. “Aristotle and the Jewish Sage According to Clearchus of Soli.” The Harvard Theological Review (July 1938) (1). #2/2 8. “The Historical Significance of the Dialogues between Jewish Sages and Roman Dignitaries.” Scripta Hierosolymitana (1971) (1). 9.” Scripta Hierosolymitana (1954) (1). 10. “Persecution and Martyrdom in Hadrian's Days” Studies in History (1972) (1). 11. “Story of the Tabernacle and the Temple of Jerusalem” The American Colony (1). 12.”The Earliest Record of Jews in Asia Minor” Journal of Biblical Literature, Volume LII Part I, (1933) (1). #2/3 13.”Hellenism” Enclopedia Judaica, Volume 16 (1972) (1). 14.”Rome and Judea” Menorah Journal (Winter 1948) (1). 15.”Story and History” Greco Roman Rhetoric and Pharasaism, H. Fischel (1969) (1). B. Offprints and Articles, German #2/4 1.”Antisemitismus” J. Heinemann, Pauly-Wissowa (1929) (1). 2.”Denkmäler Palastinas aus der Zeit Jesu” Das Land der Bibel (1916) (1). 3.”Entwicklung unserer Traditionsliteratur” Samuel Lowinger (1946) (1). 4.”Religionsgeschichtliche und theologische Bedeutsamkeit der Jüdischen Hohenpriester von 175 bis 37 v. Chr.” Bible & Liturgie, Heft 1 (1972) (1). 5. “Spätjudentum.”Sacramentum Mundi (1). 6.”Die Stellung Der Juden Gegenueber Den Römern Nach Der Rabbinischen Literatur” Nathan Wasser (1933) (1). C. Offprints and Articles, Hebrew #2/5 1. %l mtsdh .vgyb.vryh (1). 2. [email protected]@l b@ymfryh hr.vmyt [email protected] sfr.vt .hz”l, m@t mshh d.vd her (1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sprache Erkenntnis Bedeutung
    Das Dahlem Humanities Center der Freien Universi- veranstaltungsorte Sprache tät und das Simon-Dubnow-Institut an der Universi- Leipzig, 18. Oktober 2012 | 9.30–18.00 Uhr tät Leipzig veranstalten gemeinsam die zweitägige, Simon-Dubnow-Institut Goldschmidtstraße 28 Erkenntnis internationale Konferenz »Sprache, Erkenntnis und 04103 Leipzig Bedeutung. Deutsch in der jüdischen Wissenskul- Bedeutung tur«, bei der es um Fragen der deutschen Sprache Deutsch in der im Kontext der Transformation der jüdischen Kultur Berlin, 19. Oktober 2012 | 9.30–19.30 Uhr Freie Universität Berlin jüdischen in der Moderne gehen wird. Als eine kosmopo- »Rostlaube« Wissenskultur litische Sprache des Lernens und Wissens fand Seminarzentrum, Raum L 116 Deutsch unter den europäischen Juden ein hohes Habelschwerdter Allee 45 Maß an Akzeptanz. Vor allem die in deutscher Spra- 14195 Berlin-Dahlem Kooperationskonferenz des che und an deutschen akademischen Einrichtungen Simon-Dubnow-Instituts für jüdische Geschichte und Kul- erzielten herausragenden wissenschaftlichen Er- tur an der Universität Leipzig folge zogen vornehmlich in der zweiten Hälfte des und des 19. Jahrhunderts und in den ersten Jahrzehnten des Dahlem Humanities Center, Freie Universität Berlin 20. Jahrhunderts jüdische Intellektuelle aus dem östlichen Europa, aber auch aus Übersee, so den Vereinigten Staaten, an. Die vielfältige Bedeutung von Sprache manifestiert sich jenseits ihrer Geltung Dahlem Humanities Center als Kommunikationsmittel, da in ihr spezifische her- meneutische und epistemologische Konstellationen aufgehoben sind. Von dieser Überlegung ausgehend will die Tagung sich der Wirkung des Deutschen als einer jüdischen Sprache in den verschiedenen Bereichen der Geisteswissenschaften, vor allem 18.–19. Oktober 2012 der Verbreitung und Transformation von Wissen, widmen. Leipzig, 18. Oktober 2012 | 9.30–18.00 Uhr Berlin, 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Wish Someone Happy Rosh Hashanah
    Do You Wish Someone Happy Rosh Hashanah Ingelbert often adopts reversibly when bamboo Harris thrustings rampantly and infibulate her haughs. Flint hues her millepedes exorbitantly, she appoint it very. Burnaby demised flatwise while Shivaistic Nester catheterise agriculturally or dialyse upsides. Happy Rosh Hashanah 2020 What dock the Jewish New Year. Yael wants, Paul. What do you signature on Rosh Hashanah 2020? At its spring is the teaching that G-d gives second chances and invites everyone to displace the same. What to year, i know about me it appears your pals, it with a broad range of. On rosh hashanah wishes come to do they might sound like have come up by. They do you wish someone wishes; they are rosh hashanah? Prayers Greetings and Kol Nidrei for Jewish Day of Atonement. Find a happy new year wishes for you do you realize you. Find your wishes? A quality selection of birthday eCards and other greeting cards to suit any question Send more instant eCard to your friends and review with 123cardscom. In Jewish law, this course, goodbye and peace. Year secure the Rat You sucked Let's Welcome The contend of the. The secure are poised. My girlfriends when expressing congratulations on someone on my teacher that are my daughter during holy spirit will. Toronto and rosh hashanah and beautiful, doing or add to someone has occurred, as eating apples and of the first namesake suburb east celebrated? ULT library is missing. Miss you do my life cycle of rosh hashanah! Every day you wish someone wishes for rosh hashanah holiday is happy new year due to.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Early Jewish Mysticism Although this investigation will focus mainly on the roots of the Metatron lore, this Jewish tradition cannot be fully understood without addressing its broader theological and historical context, which includes a religious movement known as early Jewish mysticism. Research must therefore begin with clarifying some notions and positions pertaining to the investigation of this broader religious phenomenon. The roots of the current scholarly discussion on the origin, aim, and content of early Jewish mysticism can be traced to the writings of Gershom Scholem. His studies marked in many ways a profound breach with the previous paradigm of 19th and early 20th century scholarship solidified in the Wissenschaft des Judentums movement which viewed Jewish mystical developments as based on ideas late and external to Judaism.1 In his seminal research, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, as well as other publications,2 Scholem saw his main task as clarifying the origins of early Jewish mysticism on the basis of new methodological premises, which, in contrast to the scholars of the Wissenschaft des Judentums, approached early Jewish mysticism as a genuine Jewish movement with roots in biblical and pseudepigraphic traditions. Scholem’s project was not an easy one, and in ————— 1 One of the representatives of this movement, Heinrich Graetz, considered the Hekhalot writings as late compositions dated to the end of the Geonic period. He viewed the Hekhalot literature as “a compound of misunderstood Agadas, and of Jewish, Christian, and Mahometan fantastic notions, clothed in mystical obscurity, and pretended to be a revelation.” H. Graetz, History of the Jews (6 vols.; Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1894) 3.153.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genius and Limitations of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik Z"L
    The Genius and Limitations of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik z"l Byline: Rabbi Dr. Nathan Lopes Cardozo is Dean of the David Cardozo Academy in Jerusalem. Thoughts to Ponder 529 The Genius and Limitations of Rabbi Joseph Ber Soloveitchik z”l * Nathan Lopes Cardozo Based on an introduction to a discussion between Professor William Kolbrener and Professor Elliott Malamet (1) Honoring the publication of Professor William Kolbrener’s new book “The Last Rabbi” (2) Yad Harav Nissim, Jerusalem, on Feb. 1, 2017 Dear Friends, I never had the privilege of meeting Rav Soloveitchik z”l or learning under him. But I believe I have read all of his books on Jewish philosophy and Halacha, and even some of his Talmudic novellae and halachic decisions. I have also spoken with many of his students. Here are my impressions. No doubt Rav Soloveitchik was a Gadol Ha-dor (a great sage of his generation). He was a supreme Talmudist and certainly one of the greatest religious thinkers of our time. His literary output is incredible. Still, I believe that he was not a mechadesh – a man whose novel ideas really moved the Jewish tradition forward, especially regarding Halacha. He did not solve major halachic problems. This may sound strange, because almost no one has written as many novel ideas about Halacha as Rav Soloveitchik (3). His masterpiece, Halakhic Man, is perhaps the prime example. Before Rav Soloveitchik appeared on the scene, nobody – surely not in mainstream Orthodoxy – had seriously dealt with the ideology and philosophy of Halacha (4). Page 1 In fact, the reverse is true.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities
    THE LESTER AND SALLY ENTIN FACULTY OF HUMANITIES The Tel Aviv University undergraduate program is a three year program, offering three study tracks: double-major (dm), single-major (sm) and expanded track studies. Each department offers different options. Please check with each department to find out which study tracks are available. To earn a double-major (dm) BA, students must successfully complete the course of study in two departments. Departments need not be from the same Faculty, but they must both offer a double-major track. Some departments offer a single-major track from the second year of study. Students with outstanding scholastic achievements during their first year of double-major studies may enroll in this track. Please check with the individual departments regarding specific requirements for single-major studies. The departments of Archeology and Ancient Eastern Cultures, History of the Middle East and Africa, Classics—Greece and Rome, Hebrew Culture, and Arabic and Islam Studies offer expanded track studies, combining two fields of study in the same department, from the first year of studies. Admissions • A minimum score of 4501 on the psychometric exam. • Matriculation certificate in compliance with University standards. Some departments may have additional requirements, as specified below. 0631 Arabic and Islamic Studies (dm/sm) The Department of Arabic and Islamic studies offers students the opportunity to acquire theoretical and practical knowledge of classical and modern literary Arabic as well as Islamic religion, history and culture. Equipped with proficiency in the Arabic language, students explore the rich literary, cultural, and religious traditions of the Arab world. Fields of study The department offers two fields of study: • Arabic Language and Literature—acquaints students with the various historical periods in Arabic literature and linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Listen,Learn,Lead International Women’S Day EXPLORE the Possibilties
    Adar/Nisan 5781 March 2021 Listen,Learn,Lead International Women’s Day EXPLORE the possibilties Private tours offered by appointment Monday-Friday from 3:30-4:30 p.m. For virtual campus tours and more information about admission or tuition assistance, call 918-879-4755. Or visit hollandhall.org/admission/open-house. March 2021 CONTENTS Adar/Nisan 5781 volume 92 • number 03 This Month’s Advertisers This publication is brought to you each month thanks to the support of our advertisers. Please be sure 25 19 to use their products and services and mention that you found them 4 A Woman’s Place by Chen Shoval in the Tulsa Jewish Review. Circle Cinema 5 JFT Happenings 918.585.3504 12 Jewish Greetings by Phil Goldfarb Fitzgerald’s Funeral Home 14 March Community Events 918.585.1151 20 Holland Hall 17 Mizel School Zooms Tu B’Shevat by Janet Dundee 918.879.4755 19 From Africa to Tulsa by Bentzy Goldman J. David Jewelry 866. 558.7501 21 Zarrow Pointe Butterflies JT Enterprises 22 Katharine Penson Miller of Blessed Memory 918.951.1618 23 Sherwin Miller of Blessed Memory Levinson Sullivan Dentistry 918.496.1358 25 Tulsa Will Rogers College Middle School Holocaust Unit: “Our most difficult, most gratifying, most important Riverfield School endeavor” by Nancy Pettus 918.446.3553 26 Synagogue News Southwood Nursery 918.299.9409 Stolper Asset Management 918.745.6060 Woodland West Hospital 918.299.1208 Woodland West Pet Resort 918.299.5720 Video Revolution 17 22 918.495.0586 JEWISHTULSA.ORG 3 A Woman’s Place A digital copy of the Tulsa Jewish by Chen Shoval, Israeli Emissary Review can be found on our website at jewishtulsa.org VERY YEAR IN March, International Women’s Day is celebrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Its the Gospel According to Luke
    THE BIBLE NOTEBOOK Verse By Verse Bible Studies © 2005 Johnny L. Sanders IT’S THE GOSPEL According to Luke by Johnny L. Sanders, D. Min. Copyright© 2005 Johnny L. Sanders All Rights Reserved DEDICATION To John and Mark I love you, my sons (I never get tired of saying it) INTRODUCTION TO THE THIRD GOSPEL 2 GOSPEL. The word “Gospel” is commonly defined today as “good news” - and that it is! However, according to some accounts, in pre-New Testament times it was used to denote the reward given to the bearer of good news. In the New Testament it denotes the announcement of, and the recording of good news. There is a difference between an event and the account of the event. To Luke, the Gospel is, first and foremost, what God did through Jesus Christ, and then the continuation of what He did through His church (see the Book of Acts). The Gospel According to Luke and the Book of Acts form a unit and need to be studied together for maximum benefit. It should be remembered that this is not the Gospel of Luke - it is the Gospel of Jesus Christ, according to Luke. AUTHORSHIP. All evidence points to the fact that Luke, the Gentile physician and trusted friend and co-worker of Paul, was the author of both the Gospel According to Luke and the Book of Acts. Scholarship and tradition both support this claim. Luke wrote about one-fourth of all the Scripture in the New Testament, and the book that bears his name has been ranked by many among the most beautiful books ever written.
    [Show full text]
  • Mu'tazılı Trends in Jewısh Theology
    İslâmî İlimler Dergisi, Yıl 12, Cilt 12, Sayı 2, Güz 2017 (145/178) MU‘tazılı TRENDS ıN JEwıSH THEOLOGY - A BRıEF SURVEY David SKLARE* Abstract This article presents a brief survey of Jewish Mu‘tazilism, from its begin- nings in the late eighth or early ninth century through the seventeenth century. Short descriptions of known Jewish Mu‘tazilî authors and their works are provided. We can divide the development of Jewish Mu‘tazilism into three periods: 1) the early period characterized by eclecticism and doctrinal variety; 2) the “classic” period in which the Basran Bahshamiyya school was adopted by both Rabbanites and Karaites; 3) the late period in which epitomes of Mu‘tazilî thought were produced. The article concludes with a brief consideration of Mu‘tazilism in al-Andalus. Keywords: Mu’tazila, Jewish Theology, Jewish Mu’tazilism, Basra, Kara- ites. YAHUDI TEOLOJISINDE MU’TEZILI EĞILIMLER-KISA BIR TARAMA Öz Bu çalışma, 8.-9. yüzyıllardaki başlangıcından 17. yüzyıla kadar Yahu- di Mu’tezililiği üzerine kısa bir inceleme sunmaktadır. Tanınmış Yahudi Mu’tezilî yazarlar ve onlara ait eserler de çalışmada kısaca tanıtılmıştır. Yahudi Mu’tezililiğinin gelişimini 3 devreye ayırabiliriz: 1) Eklektizm ve doktrin çeşitliliğiyle karakterize edilebilecek olan erken dönem; 2) Basra Bahşamiyye ekolünün Rabbinikler ve Karaylar tarafından benimsendiği “klasik” dönem; 3) Mu’tezile düşüncesinin somut örneklerinin üretildiği geç dönem. Çalışmanın sonunda Yahudi Mu’tezililiğinin Endülüs’teki se- rüveni ile ilgili de kısaca bilgi verilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yahudilik, Mu’tezile, Basra, Karaylar. Makalenin Dergiye Ulaştığı Tarih: 10.10.2017. Yayın Kurulu ve Hakem Değerlendirmesinden Geçen Makalenin Yayına Kabul Edildiği Tarih: 20.11.2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review Jews and Judaism by Hiroshi Ichikawa (Iwanami Shoten, 2019)
    JISMOR 15 Book Review Jews and Judaism by Hiroshi Ichikawa (Iwanami Shoten, 2019) Toshihiro Horikawa This book summarizes 40 years of work by its author, Professor Hiroshi Ichikawa. It also presents findings from the discovery of 1st-century synagogue ruins in the region of Galilee, made in the summer of 2016 in the course of archeological excavations in Israel that Ichikawa has joined for 30 years. In the 1980s, the assertion of his Israeli teacher that “Japan’s prosperity will not last long,” struck a chord with him and made him realize how the Jews, who were forced to live in pagan lands, keenly observed the societies they lived in and prepared themselves for the adversities that awaited them. From this, he surmised that “Maybe we can learn something from the Jews in figuring out our own future, because they had become stronger by recognizing their weaknesses, and had victoriously lived through many harsh realities” (p. ii). He wrote this book in the hope that the modern generation could gain inspiration about living from the lives of the Jews. This book begins with an introductory chapter on “who is a Jew?” followed by four chapters taking up Jewish history, faith, studies, and society. The author provides a comprehensive discussion on the life of the Jews and on Judaism itself from these four perspectives. The introductory chapter defines who the Jews are. The word “Jews” is “Yehudi” in Hebrew, which is referred to the people of the tribe of Judah from the latter half of the period of Solomon’s Temple until that of the Second Temple, or to the people living in the land of Judah as recounted in the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Look at Moshe Idel's East-West Problem
    Access Provided by UCLA Library at 05/07/12 5:15PM GMT T HE J EWISH Q UARTERLY R EVIEW, Vol. 102, No. 2 (Spring 2012) 289–296 ANovelLookatMoshe Idel’s East-West Problem DAVID N. MYERS UCLA MOSHE IDEL. Old Worlds, New Mirrors: On Jewish Mysticism and Twentieth- Century Thought. Jewish Culture and Contexts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009. Pp. 336. FOR MANY OF US in the field of Jewish studies, but not in the field of Kabbalah studies, our first encounter with Moshe Idel came in 1988 with the publication of his major work in English, Kabbalah: New Perspectives. Although he had been working in the field for more than a decade, from the time of his 1976 dissertation at the Hebrew University on Avraham REVIEW FORUM Abulafia, it was Kabbalah: New Perspectives that brought Idel to wide public attention, announcing his own substantial methodological and substantive disagreements with the towering figure of modern Kabbalah studies, Ger- shom Scholem. Since then, Idel has gone on to attain a position of international distinc- tion, publishing at a staggering rate in Kabbalah studies, and many fields beyond. In the process, he—like Scholem before and Wolfson and others after him—has used the study of Kabbalah as a gateway of inquiry into important methodological, theoretical, hermeneutical, philosophical, and historical questions. This leads us to the book at hand, Old Worlds, New Mirrors: On Jewish Mysticism and Twentieth-Century Thought, which is indeed an inquiry into important methodological, theoretical, philosophical, and historical ques- tions. It reflects Idel’s brilliant, capacious, probing, and wildly imagina- tive mind, as it ranges over terrain somewhat less familiar to him and his usual readers, but of critical significance to his overarching intellectual and cultural Weltanschauung.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanning of Gershom Scholem's Milon Hazohar Card Index Yehuda Liebes the Zohar Is Among the Preeminent Spiritual Works of All Time
    1 Scanning of Gershom Scholem's Milon HaZohar Card Index Yehuda Liebes The Zohar is among the preeminent spiritual works of all time. Its history attests to its importance: within three hundred years of its creation (at the end of the 13th century) it had become the central text Kabbalistic text. The Kabbalists regarded it as an authoritative source, a model to be emulated, and an interpretive subject. One might venture to say that the most important Kabbalistic traditions, such as those of Moses ben Jacob Cordovero (the Ramak), Rabbi Isaac Luria (the Ari) and the Vilna Gaon, were nothing if not interpretations of the Zohar, from whence they derived their vitality. Gershom Scholem (1897-1982), the father of Kabbala scholarship, followed suit and made the Zohar the focus of his endeavors, both because of its critical importance in the history of Kabbala, and in deference to its essential attributes. This much is evident from Scholem's seminal work, his treatise in English on the major trends in Jewish mysticism.1 In this book Scholem describes seven major streams of Jewish mysticism, among them the Zohar. However, while the other six streams of mysticism each have a chapter devoted to them, the Zohar has two. The first of these deals with the Zohar and its authorship, the second with its theosophy. The titles of these chapters also indicate Scholem's primary interests as a researcher. On the one hand there is the book's theosophy, which he saw as the most important feature of the Zohar and of Kabbalistic doctrine in general.2 On the other
    [Show full text]
  • Why I Left My Old Home and What I Have Accomplished in America
    Chapter 4 Why I Left My Old Home and What I Have Accomplished in America Aaron Domnitz (Aba Beitani) b. 1884,Romanovo, Belarus To U.S.: 1906;settled in Baltimore, Md. The autobiography of Aaron Domnitz is the purest example of the maskil type in this collection. A deeply pious and zealous student of Gemara as a child and youth, he was drawn to the study of Hebrew literature and secular subjects as a yeshiva student. Influenced by the revolutionary fervor sur- rounding him, Domnitz romanticized workers and industrial labor but lasted only a brief time in the “shop” when he arrived in the United States. Domnitz describes his experiences as a member of the literary and intellectual circle known as “Di Yunge,” the Young Ones, while living in the Bronx in the first decades of the twentieth century. An ideal informant, the writer has a knack for keen observation, evoking his surroundings with a sharp eye and close detail, always placing the phenomena he describes vividly in their historical contexts. Introduction I want to make use of the autobiographical form, so I will skip many, many things that have occurred in my life. I will record only those details of my childhood that have in my consciousness some connection with my later urge to travel somewhere. Ruminating over my past has renewed in my memory several details that at one time made a strong impression on me, and I portray them here. These too would be interesting for a histo- rian who might sometime ruminate over old documents and want to form 124 Why I Left My Old Home and What I Have Accomplished in America 125 a complete picture of the people who took part in the great Jewish immi- gration at the beginning of the century.
    [Show full text]