DOCSLIB.ORG

Benthic Macrofaunal and Megafaunal Distribution on the Canadian Beaufort Shelf and Slope

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benthic Macrofaunal and Megafaunal Distribution on the Canadian Beaufort Shelf and Slope Benthic Macrofaunal and Megafaunal Distribution on the Canadian Beaufort Shelf and Slope by Jessica Nephin B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 2009 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the School of Earth and Ocean Sciences c Jessica Nephin, 2014 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Benthic Macrofaunal and Megafaunal Distribution on the Canadian Beaufort Shelf and Slope by Jessica Nephin B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. S. Kim Juniper School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Department of Biology Supervisor Dr. Verena Tunnicliffe School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Department of Biology Departmental Member Dr. Julia Baum Department of Biology Outside Member Dr. Philippe Archambault Université du Québec à Rimouski Additional Member iii Supervisory Committee Dr. S. Kim Juniper (School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Department of Biology) Supervisor Dr. Verena Tunnicliffe (School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Department of Biology) Departmental Member Dr. Julia Baum (Department of Biology) Outside Member Dr. Philippe Archambault (Université du Québec à Rimouski) Additional Member ABSTRACT The Arctic region has experienced the largest degree of anthropogenic warming, causing rapid, yet variable sea-ice loss. The effects of this warming on the Canadian Beaufort Shelf have led to a longer ice-free season which has assisted the expansion of northern development, mainly in the oil and gas sector. Both these direct and indirect effects of climate change will likely impact the marine ecosystem of this region, in which benthic fauna play a key ecological role. The aim of this thesis was to expand the current baseline knowledge of benthic fauna in the interest of developing the capacity to identify, predict and manage benthic change. The distribution of benthic macro- and megafauna was characterized utilizing community data from two recent benthic surveys on the Canadian Beaufort shelf and slope. Fauna were collected from 63 stations using box core and trawl sampling gear over the summers of 2009 through 2012 between depths of 30 and 1,000 m. Spatial patterns of abundance, biomass and α and β diversity metrics were examined. Megafaunal abundance and α diversity were elevated on the shelf compared to the slope while the macrofauna did not vary significantly with depth. Multivariate analyses illustrated that both macro- and megafaunal community composition varied more across the depth gradient than from east to west along the shelf. However the change across the depth gradient was greater for the megafauna than for the macrofauna. I proposed that megafaunal slope taxa were differentiated from shelf taxa, as faunal replacement not nestedness appeared to be the main driver of megafaunal β diversity across the depth gradient. The lack of correlation between macro- and megafauna in abundance, biomass and α and β diversity suggests that these faunal components vary at different spatial scales. These results demonstrate how separately sampling the different benthic components can yield different spatial patterns, with implications for future benthic monitoring in the region. This work contributes to the current regional baselines by providing the first comprehensive description of megafaunal distribution on the Canadian Beaufort shelf and by extending our knowledge of benthic distribution patterns deeper on the slope. iv Contents Supervisory Committee ii Abstract iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Acknowledgements ix 1 Introduction1 1.1 The Arctic and Canadian Beaufort Shelf in a warming climate.... 1 1.2 Benthic communities of soft-bottom continental margins....... 2 1.2.1 Distribution patterns....................... 2 1.2.2 Diversity.............................. 3 1.2.3 Faunal classes........................... 4 1.2.4 Arctic benthos .......................... 5 1.3 Physical properties of the Canadian Beaufort Shelf .......... 7 1.4 Data collection .............................. 8 1.5 Thesis goals and chapter structure.................... 11 2 Diversity, abundance and community structure of benthic macro- and megafauna on the Beaufort shelf and slope 12 2.1 Introduction................................ 12 2.2 Methods.................................. 14 2.2.1 Study area and sampling..................... 14 2.2.2 Data preparation and quality control.............. 16 2.2.3 Analyses.............................. 20 2.3 Results and Discussion.......................... 21 v 2.3.1 Distribution of occurrence, abundance and rarity . 21 2.3.2 Patterns in abundance and taxa richness............ 26 2.3.3 Patterns in β diversity...................... 30 2.4 Conclusions................................ 36 3 Spatial patterns of macro- and megafauna on the Canadian Beau- fort shelf and slope 38 3.1 Introduction................................ 38 3.2 Methods.................................. 40 3.2.1 Study area and sampling..................... 40 3.2.2 Data management ........................ 42 3.2.3 Analyses.............................. 45 3.3 Results................................... 46 3.3.1 Total abundance, biomass and diversity............. 46 3.3.2 Abundance, biomass and body size of faunal classes . 50 3.3.3 Spatial distribution of taxa.................... 54 3.3.4 β diversity trends......................... 54 3.3.5 Spatial patterns in community composition........... 57 3.3.6 Abundance of taxa by transect ................. 59 3.4 Discussion................................. 61 3.4.1 Trends in abundance, biomass and body size.......... 61 3.4.2 Faunal replacement with depth ................. 62 3.4.3 Macro- and megafaunal congruence............... 68 4 Conclusion 70 Appendix A Co-occurrence of macro- and megafaunal taxa 74 Appendix B Variability in relative abundance of taxa from trawl and video data 80 Appendix C Meiofauna-macrofauna comparison 84 Appendix D Macro- and megafaunal datasets 87 Glossary 98 Bibliography 101 vi List of Tables Table 1.1 Examples of macro- and megafaunal taxa of the Beaufort Shelf. 6 Table 2.1 Shared taxa that were classed as megafauna and removed from the macrofauna dataset....................... 18 Table 2.2 Shared taxa that were classed as macrofauna and removed from the megafauna dataset....................... 20 Table 2.3 Total abundance and richness by sample with year, depth and location of sampling......................... 25 Table 2.4 Analysis of variance of macro- and megafaunal abundance and taxa richness with year and depth................. 29 Table 3.1 Shared taxa which were classed as megafauna and removed from the macrofauna dataset....................... 43 Table 3.2 Shared taxa which were classed as macrofauna and removed from the megafauna dataset....................... 44 Table 3.3 Total abundance, biomass and richness by sample with depth and location of sampling......................... 47 Table 3.4 Analysis of variance of macro- and megafaunal abundance, biomass and diversity with depth and transect............... 49 Table 3.5 Mean abundance of macro- and megafaunal taxa in all four transects 60 Table 3.6 Feeding modes of dominant macrofaunal taxa .......... 66 Table 3.7 Feeding modes of dominant megafaunal taxa........... 67 Table C.1 Total abundance and biomass of meio- and macrofauna by sample 85 Table D.1 Macrofaunal data from ArcticNet sampling............ 87 Table D.2 Megafaunal data from ArcticNet sampling ............ 89 Table D.3 Macrofaunal data from BREA sampling.............. 93 Table D.4 Megafaunal data from BREA sampling.............. 94 vii List of Figures Figure 1.1 Features of the Canadian Beaufort shelf and slope....... 8 Figure 1.2 Major benthic surveys on the Canadian Beaufort shelf and slope 10 Figure 2.1 Beaufort slope model....................... 15 Figure 2.2 Sampling stations and ice coverage on the Beaufort shelf and slope from 2009 to 2011 ..................... 16 Figure 2.3 Distribution of occurrence.................... 23 Figure 2.4 Proportion of rare taxa unique to or shared between shelf and slope................................ 24 Figure 2.5 Relationships of total macro- and megafaunal abundance with depth ............................... 27 Figure 2.6 Comparison of macro- and megafaunal abundance and taxa richness between shelf and slope stations and sampling years . 28 Figure 2.7 Individual-based rarefaction curves for 2009 and 2010 megafau- nal datasets............................ 30 Figure 2.8 β diversity across the depth gradient.............. 31 Figure 2.9 Dendrogram and nMDS ordination of station similarities . 32 Figure 2.10 Map of Beaufort sampling region with georeferenced clusters . 34 Figure 2.11 Relative abundance and depth ranges of dominant taxa . 35 Figure 3.1 Box corer and beam trawl sampling stations on the Beaufort shelf and slope .......................... 41 Figure 3.2 Total abundance, biomass and diversity across depth and tran- sects................................ 48 Figure 3.3 Abundance of dominant classes across transects and depths . 51 Figure 3.4 Biomass of dominant classes across transects and depths . 52 Figure 3.5 Average body size of dominant classes across transects and depths 53 Figure 3.6 Number of taxa unique to or shared between transects . 54 Figure 3.7 β diversity across the depth gradient.............. 56 viii Figure 3.8 Correlation between macro- and megafaunal Bray-Curtis simi-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary
    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
    1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to refl ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD defi nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Diversity of Marine Isopods (Except Asellota and Crustacean Symbionts)
    Collection Review Global Diversity of Marine Isopods (Except Asellota and Crustacean Symbionts) Gary C. B. Poore1*, Niel L. Bruce2,3 1 Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2 Museum of Tropical Queensland and School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia, 3 Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa known from the supralittoral and intertidal to depths in excess of Abstract: The crustacean order Isopoda (excluding six kilometres. Isopods are a highly diverse group of crustaceans, Asellota, crustacean symbionts and freshwater taxa) with more than 10,300 species known to date, approximately comprise 3154 described marine species in 379 genera 6,250 of these being marine or estuarine. In the groups under in 37 families according to the WoRMS catalogue. The discussion here (about half the species) the vast majority of species history of taxonomic discovery over the last two centuries are known from depths of less than 1000 metres. is reviewed. Although a well defined order with the Peracarida, their relationship to other orders is not yet The Isopoda is one of the orders of peracarid crustaceans, that resolved but systematics of the major subordinal taxa is is, those that brood their young in a marsupium under the body. relatively well understood. Isopods range in size from less They are uniquely defined within Peracarida by the combination than 1 mm to Bathynomus giganteus at 365 mm long. of one pair of uropods attached to the pleotelson and pereopods of They inhabit all marine habitats down to 7280 m depth only one branch. Marine isopods are arguably the most but with few doubtful exceptions species have restricted morphologically diverse order of all the Crustacea.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTOR : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTE DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITOR : Anne Mabille ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Anne Mabille COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : James Carpenter (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Henrik Enghoff (NHMD, Copenhague, Danemark) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Peter Ng (University of Singapore) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Jean-François Silvain (IRD, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) John Wenzel (The Ohio State University, Columbus, États-Unis) COUVERTURE / COVER : Akrophryxus milvus n. gen., n. sp., holotype female, MNHN-IU-2014-20314, attached to Ethusa machaera Castro, 2005, macropod images. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) Les articles ainsi que les nouveautés nomenclaturales publiés dans Zoosystema sont référencés par / Articles and nomenclatural novelties published in Zoosystema are referenced by: – ZooBank® (http://zoobank.org) Zoosystema est une revue en flux continu publiée par les Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris / Zoosystema is a fast track journal published by the Museum Science Press, Paris Les Publications scientifiques du Muséum publient aussi / The Museum Science Press also publish: Adansonia, Geodiversitas, Anthropozoologica, European Journal of Taxonomy, Naturae, Cryptogamie sous-sections Algologie, Bryologie, Mycologie. Diffusion – Publications scientifiques Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle CP 41 – 57 rue Cuvier F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Tél.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malacostracan Fauna of Two Arctic Fjords (West Spitsbergen): the Diversity And
    + Models OCEANO-95; No. of Pages 24 Oceanologia (2017) xxx, xxx—xxx Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect j ournal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/oceanologia/ ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE The malacostracan fauna of two Arctic fjords (west Spitsbergen): the diversity and distribution patterns of its pelagic and benthic components Joanna Legeżyńska *, Maria Włodarska-Kowalczuk, Marta Gluchowska, Mateusz Ormańczyk, Monika Kędra, Jan Marcin Węsławski Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland Received 14 July 2016; accepted 6 January 2017 KEYWORDS Summary This study examines the performance of pelagic and benthic Malacostraca in two Malacostraca; glacial fjords of west Spitsbergen: Kongsfjorden, strongly influenced by warm Atlantic waters, Arctic; and Hornsund which, because of the strong impact of the cold Sørkapp Current, has more of Svalbard; an Arctic character. The material was collected during 12 summer expeditions organized from Diversity; 1997 to 2013. In all, 24 pelagic and 116 benthic taxa were recorded, most of them widely Distribution distributed Arctic-boreal species. The advection of different water masses from the shelf had a direct impact on the structure of the pelagic Malacostraca communities, resulting in the clear dominance of the sub-arctic hyperiid amphipod Themisto abyssorum in Kongsfjorden and the great abundance of Decapoda larvae in Hornsund. The taxonomic, functional and size compositions of the benthic malacostracan assemblages varied between the two fjords, and also between the glacier-proximate inner bays and the main fjord basins, as a result of the varying dominance patterns of the same assemblage of species. There was a significant drop in species richness in the strongly disturbed glacial bays of both fjords, but only in Hornsund was this accompanied by a significant decrease in density and diversity, probably due to greater isolation and poorer quality of sediment organic matter in its innermost basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Épicarides Et Rhizocéphales De Roscoff
    ÉPICARIDES ET RHIZOCÉPHALES DE ROSCOFF. par Roland Bourdon. Station Biologique de Roscoff. Bien que les Epicarides et les Rhizocéphales de Roscoff aient fait l'objet de diverses recherches, notamment de la part de Ch. Pérez (1), aucun inventaire des espèces n’en avait encore été dressé. Les formes signalées par les différents auteurs étaient d’ailleurs assez peu nom­ breuses puisqu’elles ne dépa-ssaient pas la vingtaine. Les prospections qu’il nous a été donné d’effectuer, tant à la côte qu’en dragage, depuis septembre 1960, nous ont montré que la région de Roscoff est, en fait, beaucoup plus riche en parasites, leur nombre s’élevant, en effet, à 52 espèces parasitant 48 hôtes différents. De même que nous l’avons fait dans une note précédente (Bour­ don, 1960), nous accompagnerons la présente liste d’une statistique d’infestation pour chaque espèce et, éventuellement, de quelques remarques d’ordre morphologique ou éthologique, réservant à plus tard la publication d’un travail systématique et biologique d’ensemble sur la faune des Epicarides des côtes de France. RHIZOCÉPHALES. Famille des Peltogas+ridae. SEPTOSACCUS RODRIGUEZI (Fraisse, 1876). Hôte : Diogenes pugilator (Roux, 1829). Matériel examiné : 2.851 individus. Fréquence : 219 cas, soit un taux d’infestation de 7,7 p. 100. Stations : Saint-Efflam ; également Locquirec, d’après Pérez (1928). Remarques. — Des taux d’infestation nettement plus élevés ont été donnés pour cette espèce à Saint-Efflam. C’est ainsi que Pérez (1928, 1929) trouvait un degré de parasitisme d’environ 40 p. 100 et que Veillet (1951) indiquait que le quart des Diogenes portait le Septosaccus.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ghost and Mud Shrimp
    Zootaxa 4365 (3): 251–301 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5AC71E8-2F60-448E-B50D-22B61AC11E6A Parasites (Isopoda: Epicaridea and Nematoda) from ghost and mud shrimp (Decapoda: Axiidea and Gebiidea) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species of bopyrid isopod and clarification of Pseudione Kossmann, 1881 CHRISTOPHER B. BOYKO1,4, JASON D. WILLIAMS2 & JEFFREY D. SHIELDS3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West @ 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Aquatic Health Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 252 Introduction . 252 Methods and materials . 253 Taxonomy . 253 Isopoda Latreille, 1817 . 253 Bopyroidea Rafinesque, 1815 . 253 Ionidae H. Milne Edwards, 1840. 253 Ione Latreille, 1818 . 253 Ione cornuta Bate, 1864 . 254 Ione thompsoni Richardson, 1904. 255 Ione thoracica (Montagu, 1808) . 256 Bopyridae Rafinesque, 1815 . 260 Pseudioninae Codreanu, 1967 . 260 Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981. 260 Acrobelione halimedae n. sp. 260 Key to females of species of Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981 . 262 Gyge Cornalia & Panceri, 1861. 262 Gyge branchialis Cornalia & Panceri, 1861 . 262 Gyge ovalis (Shiino, 1939) . 264 Ionella Bonnier, 1900 .
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint PINRO/IMR Report on the State of the Barents Sea Ecosystem 2006, with Expected Situation and Considerations for Management
    IMR/PINRO J O S I E N I 2 R T 2007 E R E S P O R T JOINT PINRO/IMR REPORT ON THE STATE OFTHE BARENTS SEA ECOSYSTEM IN 2006 WITH EXPECTED SITUATION AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT Institute of Marine Research - IMR Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography - PINRO This report should be cited as: Stiansen, J.E and A.A. Filin (editors) Joint PINRO/IMR report on the state of the Barents Sea ecosystem 2006, with expected situation and considerations for management. IMR/PINRO Joint Report Series No. 2/2007. ISSN 1502-8828. 209 pp. Contributing authors in alphabetical order: A. Aglen, N.A. Anisimova, B. Bogstad, S. Boitsov, P. Budgell, P. Dalpadado, A.V. Dolgov, K.V. Drevetnyak, K. Drinkwater, A.A. Filin, H. Gjøsæter, A.A. Grekov, D. Howell, Å. Høines, R. Ingvaldsen, V.A. Ivshin, E. Johannesen, L.L. Jørgensen, A.L. Karsakov, J. Klungsøyr, T. Knutsen, P.A. Liubin, L.J. Naustvoll, K. Nedreaas, I.E. Manushin, M. Mauritzen, S. Mehl, N.V. Muchina, M.A. Novikov, E. Olsen, E.L. Orlova, G. Ottersen, V.K. Ozhigin, A.P. Pedchenko, N.F. Plotitsina, M. Skogen, O.V. Smirnov, K.M. Sokolov, E.K. Stenevik, J.E. Stiansen, J. Sundet, O.V. Titov, S. Tjelmeland, V.B. Zabavnikov, S.V. Ziryanov, N. Øien, B. Ådlandsvik, S. Aanes, A. Yu. Zhilin Joint PINRO/IMR report on the state of the Barents Sea ecosystem in 2006, with expected situation and considerations for management ISSUE NO.2 Figure 1.1. Illustration of the rich marine life and interactions in the Barents Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoenvironmental Interpretation of Late Quaternary Marine Molluscan Assemblages, Canadian Arctic Archipelago
    Document generated on 09/25/2021 1:46 a.m. Géographie physique et Quaternaire Palaeoenvironmental Interpretation of Late Quaternary Marine Molluscan Assemblages, Canadian Arctic Archipelago Interprétation paléoenvironnementale des faunes de mollusques marins de l'Archipel arctique canadien, au Quaternaire supérieur. Interpretación paleoambiental de asociaciones marinas de muluscos del Cuaternario Tardío, Archipiélago Ártico Canadiense Sandra Gordillo and Alec E. Aitken Volume 54, Number 3, 2000 Article abstract This study examines neonto- logical and palaeontological data pertaining to URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/005650ar arctic marine molluscs with the goal of reconstructing the palaeoecology of DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/005650ar Late Quaternary ca. 12-1 ka BP glaciomarine environments in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. A total of 26 taxa that represent 15 bivalves and 11 See table of contents gastropods were recorded in shell collections recovered from Prince of Wales, Somerset, Devon, Axel Heiberg and Ellesmere islands. In spite of taphonomic bias, the observed fossil faunas bear strong similarities to modern benthic Publisher(s) molluscan faunas inhabiting high latitude continental shelf environments, reflecting the high preservation potential of molluscan taxa in Quaternary Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal marine sediments. The dominance of an arctic-boreal fauna represented by Hiatella arctica, Mya truncata and Astarte borealis is the product of natural ISSN ecological conditions in high arctic glaciomarine environments. Environmental factors controlling the distribution and species composition of the Late 0705-7199 (print) Quaternary molluscan assemblages from this region are discussed. 1492-143X (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Gordillo, S. & Aitken, A. E. (2000). Palaeoenvironmental Interpretation of Late Quaternary Marine Molluscan Assemblages, Canadian Arctic Archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Chapter 2. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Inventory By Lyman K. Thorsteinson .............................................................................................................. 23 Chapter 3 Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Species By Milton S. Love, Mancy Elder, Catherine W. Mecklenburg Lyman K. Thorsteinson, and T. Anthony Mecklenburg .................................................................. 41 Pacific and Arctic Lamprey ............................................................................................................. 49 Pacific Lamprey………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………49 Arctic Lamprey…………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….55 Spotted Spiny Dogfish to Bering Cisco ……………………………………..…………………….…………………………60 Spotted Spiney Dogfish………………………………………………………………………………………………..60 Arctic Skate………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….66 Pacific Herring……………………………….……………………………………………………………………………..70 Pond Smelt……………………………………….………………………………………………………………………….78 Pacific Capelin…………………………….………………………………………………………………………………..83 Arctic Smelt………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….91 Chapter 2. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Inventory By Lyman K. Thorsteinson1 Abstract Introduction Several other marine fishery investigations, including A large number of Arctic fisheries studies were efforts for Arctic data recovery and regional analyses of range started following the publication of the Fishes of Alaska extensions, were ongoing concurrent to this study. These (Mecklenburg and others, 2002). Although the results of included
    [Show full text]