Behavior of Model Circular Footings on Silty Soils with Cellular Supports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Behavior of Model Circular Footings on Silty Soils with Cellular Supports BEHAVIOR OF MODEL CIRCULAR FOOTINGS ON SILTY SOILS WITH CELLULAR SUPPORTS R. Gupta* Department of Civil Engineering, Thapar University 147001, Patiala, India [email protected] A. Trivedi Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi College of Engineering 110042, Delhi, India [email protected] *Corresponding Author (Received: April 14, 2009 – Accepted in Revised Form: November 5, 2009) Abstract An experimental study of the effect of silt and influence of cell confinement on the bearing capacity of circular footings on silty sand was carried out. Laboratory experiments on clean sand and sand containing silt up to 25 % were performed. Cells with different heights and diameters were used to confine the silty sand. The effect of proportion of silt in sand, cell diameter, cell height and the embedded depth of footing were studied. Initially, the response of a footing without cellular support was determined and then compared with that of footing with cellular support. The results indicate that the bearing capacity of circular footing can be appreciably increased by soil confinement. It was interpreted that such confinement resists lateral displacement of soil underneath the footing. It leads to a significant improvement in the bearing capacity of the footing. The cell–soil footing behaves as one unit for small cell diameters, while this pattern was no longer observed with large diameter cells. Results of model-scale footing tests show that bearing capacity decreases with fines. It is due to fact that on the increase of silt while density increases but increase in compressibility offsets the effect of density. The cell height, depth, and diameter that give the maximum bearing capacity improvement are presented and discussed. Keywords Silty Soil, Model Tests, Footings, Shallow Foundations, Bearing Capacity, Confinement ﭼﻜﻴﺪه ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﻠﺖ و ﻣﺤﻔﻈﻪ ﺳﻠﻮل ﺑﺮ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻫﺎي ﻣﺪور ﻣﺎﺳﻪ ﺳﻴﻠﺘﻲ ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ ﺷﺪ. آزﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ روي ﻣﺎﺳﻪ ﺗﻤﻴﺰ و ﻣﺎﺳﻪ ﺣﺎوي ﺗﺎ 25% ﺳﻴﻠﺖ اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪ. ﺳﻠﻮل ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ارﺗﻔﺎع و ﻗﻄﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﺎوت ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺤﺒﻮس ﻛﺮدن ﻣﺎﺳﻪ ﺳﻴﻠﺘﻲ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺳﻴﻠﺖ در ﻣﺎﺳﻪ، ﻗﻄﺮ و ارﺗﻔﺎع ﺳﻠﻮل، و ﻋﻤﻖ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. در اﺑﺘﺪا ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﺪون ﺗﻜﻴ ﻪﮔﺎه ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ و آﻧﮕﺎه ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ داراي ﺗﻜﻴ ﻪﮔﺎه ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺷﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﻲ دﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺒﻮس ﻛﺮدن ﺧﺎك ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮان ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﺪور را ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺪار ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ اﻓﺰاﻳﺶ داد. ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ اﻳﻦ اﻣﺮ اﻳﻦ اﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺒﻮس ﻛﺮدن ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻘﺎوﻣﺖ در ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻲ ﺧﺎك زﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮد. اﻳﻦ اﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮد ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ در ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮد. ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﺧﺎك ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﻳﻚ واﺣﺪ ﺑﺮاي ﻗﻄﺮﻫﺎي ﺳﻠﻮل ﻛﻮﭼﻚ رﻓﺘﺎر ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ، در ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ اﻳﻦ اﻟﮕﻮ در ﺳﻠﻮل ﻫﺎي ﻗﻄﻮر ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪه ﻧﺸﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ آزﻣﻮن ﻫﺎي ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﮔﺬاري ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﻲ دﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺑﺎ اﻓﺰاﻳﺶ ﻣﻴﺰان ذرات رﻳﺰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ. اﻳﻦ اﻣﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ از اﻳﻦ واﻗﻌﻴﺖ اﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ در ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ اﻓﺰاSIDﻳﺶ ﺳﻴﻠﺖ ofداﻧﺴﻴ ﺘﻪ اﻓﺰاﻳﺶ ﻣﻲ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ، اﻣﺎ اﻓﺰاﻳﺶ در ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ Archiveﻓﺸﺮدﮔﻲ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ داﻧﺴﻴﺘﻪ را ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ. ارﺗﻔﺎع، ﻋﻤﻖ و ﻗﻄﺮ ﺳﻠﻮل ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ اﻓﺰاﻳﺶ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ را اﻳﺠﺎد ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ، اراﺋﻪ و ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺮار ﻣ ﻲﮔﻴﺮد. 1. INTRODUCTION Barinadi, Yammuna and Ganga, where the river sands are obtained with varied proportions of non- In the Indo-Gangetic planes, the Indian subcontinent plastic silts. The authors have diverse experiences has vast deposits of silty sands along the bank of with the soil exploration of these deposits for perennial Himalayan Rivers namely Indus, Ghaggar, structural foundations [1]. As per soil classification IJE Transactions B: Applications Vol. 23, No. 1, February 2010 - 21 www.SID.ir systems, the sand and silt are coarse and fine the available solutions is to use side supports to the grained granular materials. These are obtained in excavation during construction. Due to the abundance as geological deposits in the earth crust. problems associated with the removal of these They occur with varied surface textures and shapes supports, they are provided as part of the ranging from angular to spherical with moisture in permanent structure. Accordingly it consists of two void space. In modern times, some of the granular parts; it is to deal with the structural analysis of the industrial byproducts deposited as structural fill footing if the side supports are used as end with common range of specific gravity, unit weight supports for the foundation [13]. Secondly, the and grain characteristics are often classified for effect of these supports on the lateral movement of sizes as sand and silts [2]. Over the past fifty years, the soil underneath the foundation is to be there were intensive attempts to characterize sandy investigated as the effect of the lateral confinement soil without fines [3-7]. However, there were on the bearing capacity of the silty sands. While scanty efforts to map the engineering behavior of there are several solutions for the first problem, silty sands. The authors observed that silty sands such as isolating the foundation from the side are largely found in earth crest in a low to medium supports but the effect of lateral confinement by density states with varied moisture. This material these side supports on the foundation behavior is supports structural rafts and deep foundations for not well understood. multistoried buildings, underground excavations, The experimental studies on bearing capacity of tunnels and pipeline. There is a need to characterize sands need to include the followings: this granular media as an engineering material. There is a better understanding of the anticipated (I) Effect of proportion of fines on the bearing behavior of clean sand under undrained monotonic capacity of silty sands. loading in terms of its initial state of stress, void (II) Effect of confinement on the bearing ratio and state parameters. There is a mixed capacity of silty sands opinion in the literature on the role of fines on In order to investigate the effect of confinement on stress strain behavior of silty sand [8-10]. It is bearing capacity of circular footing, the cells were difficult to anticipate why the behavior of silty fabricated in the laboratory. These were made of sand is contractile. The basis for deformations, mild steel plates of thickness of 0.94 mm and whether silty sand would be contractile or dilative having different diameters. The cells were open at and what kind of stress strain behavior is to be both the ends. It was modeled as a circular footing expected compared with that of clean sand needs supported on a silty soil, which is surrounded by a further explanation. The factor that controls the mild steel cell having same soil outside. The tests behavior of confined silty sands is a matter to be were performed first without cells (un-confined investigated. The natural sands contain varying case) below the footing and then with cells amount of fines, whereas the current knowledge of (confined case) and the results of ultimate bearing its engineering behavior is primarily based on capacity are compared. clean sands [11,12]. Further, the presence of fines in sand has an influence on the bearing capacity. The problem of bearing capacity of shallow foundations on granular 2. REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK soils has been studiedArchive for many years [3-7]. of SID However, an accurate solution capable of predicting The investigations on the void ratio of silty sands peak load carrying capacity for a wide range of soil reveal some intrinsic dissimilarity. A series of tests relative densities, effective stress conditions and were carried out on Brenda tailings sand to know foundation shapes within a practical context remains the maximum and minimum void ratios [14]. It has elusive owing to the presence of fines. been found that the maximum and minimum void The structural measures for foundations are ratios of silty sand decreased as silt content widely used in weak soil conditions to support increases from 0 to 20 %. Similar trends were column loads. Sometimes the excavation needs to observed for Navada and Ottawa sands mixed with be braced during foundation construction. One of non-plastic fines [15]. 22 - Vol. 23, No. 1, February 2010 IJE Transactions B: Applications www.SID.ir Lade, et al [15] explained the pattern of decreasing increase in bearing capacity could be achieved the maximum and minimum void ratios of silty with the provision of geocell in the foundation sand with increasing fine content. With increasing sand. Dash, et al [19] conducted the model test percentage of fines in a dense or loose sand matrix, results on a circular footing supported on a dense most silt particles initially occupy the voids among sand layer (relative density of 70%) overlying a sand particles. This represents the reduction in void soft clay bed which showed about a 6-fold increase ratio with increasing the amount of fines. Some silt in bearing capacity with the provision of geocell in particles, however, end up between the surfaces of the overlying sand layer. The higher performance adjacent sand particles. Such particles would tend to improvement due to geocell in the sand bed cause an increase in void ratio, as they do not occupy compared with that in the soft clay bed is attributed the natural void space left by the sand matrix. This to the mobilization of higher passive force at the process pushes sand particles apart. geocell walls and frictional resistance at the For a given overall void ratio, there is a fines geogrid-soil surface. content for which they completely (or almost The aim of present study is to model and completely) separate adjacent sand particles. An investigate the effect of cell confinement in silty easy way to determine the fines content for which sands on the behavior of soil foundation system.
Recommended publications
  • I/ General Description and Characterization of the NBS Entity
    Objects/shapes/ physical projects > On the ground > system for erosion control “vegetation engineering systems for slope erosion control” STRONG SLOPE REVEGETATION (Steeper than 2:1) I/ General description and characterization of the NBS entity I.1 Definition and different variants existing Definition • Stabilizing soils structure on steepened slopes through revegetation in order to minimize or prevent the erosion of soil by wind or rain and landslides, avoiding sedimentation problems Smart slope-vegetated-retaining-wall, Dakota. Furbish 2013. © United Themes. When the slope is really steeped, the most common slope stabilization and erosion prevention method is some kind of retaining slopes method joined with revegetation. The origin of unstable slopes can be natural because of the soil geotechnical properties, or as consequence of human activities that create new cutting slopes or embankments during construction works. When soil is disturbed at a construction site, or the natural vegetation cover is retired, the erosion rate may increase significantly. Proper planning and use of erosion control prevention and mitigation measures can reduce the impact of human-caused erosion. In order to stabilize steepened slopes, some kind of soil retention method is nevertheless needed; joining it with a well-established vegetative cover is one of the most effective methods of reducing erosion in unstable slopes steeper than 2H:1V. The retention method keeps the soil meanwhile vegetation protects soil surfaces from rain generated splash erosion and can help to slow runoff flows across a disturbed ground. 1 / 11 In addition, plant roots hold their soil in place, keeping it from washing away during rainstorms. Lastly, trees help to prevent high winds from blowing away top soil because the trees provide windbreaks, which can prevent high winds.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular Confinement Systems
    Cellular Confinement Systems EROSION CONTROL TECHNIQUE Revegetation [1] Temperate Climates ✔ Short-Term [2] Non Vegetation ✔ Wet Tropics ✔ Long-Term [2] Weed Control Semi-Arid Zones ✔ Permanent ✔ [1] Vegetation, such as grasses, can be established within the cells. [2] Can be used for short-term erosion control, but is most commonly used as a permanent treatment. Symbol Photo 1 – Cellular confinement system Photo 2 – Cellular confinement system used to restrict gravel movement on a used to retain soil and assist in the permanent car park establishment of grass on a steep slope Key Principles 1. Critical design parameters are the size and depth of the cells, choice of cell wall texture (smooth or rough, solid or perforated), type of anchorage system (applicable to slopes and concave surfaces), and the choice of infill material. 2. It is critical to ensure the top of the cellular confinement system (CCS) is set flush with, or slightly below, the adjacent terrain to avoid stormwater run-on water being diverted along the edge of the matrix. Design Information The following design information applies to applications not within a drainage channel. For use as a channel/chute lining, refer to the separate fact sheet within the ‘Drainage Control’ section. Step 1 Determine the type of cell wall: smooth, textured, or perforated. Textured or perforated surfaces (Photo 4) are required when the honeycomb matrix is installed with a concave profile that may cause the matrix to lift from the ground. Perforated cell walls are required when it is necessary for water flow to pass laterally through the cell walls (Photos 5 & 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Specifications, Special Provisions and Supplemental Terms and Conditions HALDEMAN CREEK WEIR REPLACEMENT
    Technical Specifications, Special Provisions and Supplemental Terms and Conditions For HALDEMAN CREEK WEIR REPLACEMENT Collier Co. Project No.: 60103 Collier Co. Work Order No.: 4500158645 Atkins Project No.: 100045545 Date: October 20, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ..........................................................1 ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ..................................................................... 2 SECTION 101 - MOBILIZATION ..............................................................................3 SECTION 110 - CLEARING AND GRUBBING ......................................................6 SECTION 120-SPECIAL – DITCH FINISH GRADING .........................................7 SECTION 400.1-SPECIAL – DEWATERING .........................................................8 SECTION 425 - INLETS, MANHOLES, AND JUNCTION BOXES .....................9 SECTION 515 – PEDESTRIAN/BICYLE RAILINGS, GUIDERAILS, AND HANDRAILS ...................................................................................................10 SECTION 570 - PERFORMANCE TURF .............................................................13 SECTION CF-SPECIAL – COCONUT FIBER EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ...........................................................................................................14 SECTION ELEC-SPECIAL – ELECTRICAL WORK ...........................................18 SECTION GATE-SPECIAL – HINGED CREST GATES ....................................24 SECTION GW-SPECIAL – GEOWEB STABILIZATION ....................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Triple Crown Line Development Inc
    Triple Crown Line Development Inc. Revised Slope Stability Analysis Triple Crown Line Residential Development Airport Road and Cranston Drive City of Caledon East, Ontario Project Number BRM-00235186-G0 Prepared By: EXP Services Inc. 56 Clark Boulevard Brampton, Ontario, Canada L6T 4V1 Date Submitted September 11, 2018 Slope Stability Analysis Update BRM-00235186-G0 Triple Crown Line Residential Development Caledon East, Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 3 2 Site Visit 4 3 Slope Conditions 5 4 Subsurface Conditions 6 4.1 Subsoil ................................................................................................................. 6 4.1.1 Section 2 (Borehole 14) ............................................................................ 6 4.1.2 Section 9 (Borehole 61) ............................................................................ 7 4.1.3 Section 10 (Borehole 62) .......................................................................... 8 4.1.4 Section 12 (Boreholes 64 and 65) ............................................................ 9 5 General Slope Stability Analyses 11 5.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 11 5.2 Results of Stability Analyses .............................................................................. 13 5.2.1 Section 2 (Figures 1 and 2) .................................................................... 13 5.2.2 Section 9 (Figures 3 and 4) ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Geoweb Slope Protection System Technical Overview
    PRESTO GEOWEB® SLOPE PROTECTION SYSTEM TECHNICAL OVERVIEW MULTILAYER GEOWEB PROTECTION OF CUT SLOPE VEGETATED GEOWEB SLOPE PROTECTION EMBANKMENT FILL SOIL NAIL REINFORCEMENT NATIVE SOIL GEOMEMBRANE / GEOTEXTILE GEOWEB SLOPE AND UNDERLAYER CREST PROTECTION GEOTEXTILE UNDERLAYER VEGETATED GEOWEB INFILL CONTAINED FLUID INTEGRAL POLYMER REINFORCED EARTHFILL TENDON CONTAINMENT DIKE PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS 670 N PERKINS STREET, APPLETON, WISCONSIN, USA 54914 Ph: 920-738-1707 or 800-548-3424 ■ Fax: 920-738-1222 e-mail: [email protected] WWW.PRESTOGEO.COM/ GWSLTO 25-AUG-08 PRESTO ® GEOWEB SLOPE PROTECTION SYSTEM TECHNICAL OVERVIEW Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1 Examples of Geoweb Slope Surface Stabilization........................................................................................1 Surface Instability - Identifying Problems and Defining Causes ...................................................................1 General Surface Erosion Problems...........................................................................................................1 Localized Surface Instability Problems......................................................................................................1 General Slope Cover Instability Problems.................................................................................................2 Geoweb Slope Stabilization Systems - The Key Components .....................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Job Owner Dr
    Case Study job owner Dr. Lyle and Esther Kraugh application Landslide Repair engineer Gale-Tec Engineering, Inc. location Jordan, MN installer Rachel Contracting product Miragrid® 5XT Geogrid TenCateTM develops and produces materials Gale-Tec Engineering selected a reinforced soil through a sand vein near the middle/upper ele- that function to increase performance, reduce slope (RSS) to repair the failed riverbank. The vation of the slope. costs and deliver measurable results by working RSS consisted of Miragrid® 5XT and Miragrid® with our customers to provide advanced solu- 8XT geogrid reinforcement layers placed in con- THE DESIGN tions. junction with a compacted granular backfill. The design included two phases (lower slope The geogrid provides high tensile strength and and upper slope stabilization). The lower slope THE BACKGROUND high interface friction when embedded in soil. was simple cut/graded to a consistent slope A landslide comprising approximately 400 ft The stability afforded by the interaction angle while trying to minimize any changes to along the banks of the Sand Creek in Jordan, between the geogrids and granular backfill the existing angle of the slope. Then it was sta- Minnesota occurred in March of 2006. A single allowed for re-construction of the slope at a bilized by placing a layer of 4” cellular confine- family residence was located 50 ft away from 1H:1V angle. Figure 1 shows the Gale-Tec plan ment over the entire surface. The 4” cellular the top of slope. The failure resulted in a slump constructed by Rachel Contracting, Inc. confinement was filled with topsoil barrow, of 30 ft deep occurring in the top of the 75 ft seeded and covered with a Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Hazard Assessment Addendum Proposed Residential Short Plat 1014 – 23Rd Avenue Southwest Puyallup, Washington PN: 7065000020 Doc ID: Mkwest.23Rdavesw.Ghaa
    June 23, 2020 MK West, Inc 2701 – 13th Street Place Southwest Puyallup, Washington 98371 (253) 222-0255 Attn: Mr. Michael Kerschner [email protected] Geologic Hazard Assessment Addendum Proposed Residential Short Plat 1014 – 23rd Avenue Southwest Puyallup, Washington PN: 7065000020 Doc ID: MKWest.23rdAveSW.GHAa This addendum to our Geologic Hazard Assessment addresses the erosion hazard areas at the site and the slope stability of the proposed permanent cut slopes associated with the proposed development. We understand the City of Puyallup is requiring an update to our Geologic Hazard Assessment to address the presence of an erosion hazard area at the site. Additionally, we understand that permanent cut slopes are now proposed at the site, which will need to meet the performance standards per Puyallup Municipal Code (PMC) 21.06.1230. The proposed site grading and the locations of our previous subsurface explorations are shown on the Site & Exploration Plan, Figure 1. We previously prepared a Soils Report dated April 24, 2019 and a Geologic Hazard Assessment dated November 14, 2019 for the proposed residential short plat at the site. Our soils report included the subsurface explorations and descriptive logs of 4 test pits excavated across the site. We also reviewed the Geotechnical Study Report Update by Pacific Geo Engineering dated December 8, 2016, which included 4 previous hand auger explorations at the site. We did not perform any additional subsurface explorations or laboratory testing a part of our original Geologic Hazard Assessment or this addendum. This addendum address comments from the Landau Associates, Inc, as the City of Puyallup third-party geotechnical engineering reviewer dated February 7, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Geofabrics Rail Brochure Aug2020 DIGITAL.Pdf
    GENERAL BROCHURE RAIL & TRACK SPECIALIST GEOFABRICS IS THE ONLY GEOTEXTILE MANUFACTURER IN AUSTRALIA. As Australia’s geotextile supplier of choice we pride ourselves in providing the best service to customers throughout the country. Proud member of the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia INDEX 5 THE RAIL CORRIDOR 6 MUD PUMPING SOLUTION 7 SEPARATION SOLUTION 8 BALLAST STABILISATION 10 SUB - BALLAST STABILISATION 11 SUBSOIL DRAINAGE SOLUTIONS 12 WALL SYSTEMS 13 ROCKFALL PROTECTION 14 EROSION CONTROL FOR SLOPES 16 SMARTER INFRASTRUCTURE 16 WHERE YOU NEED US Geofabrics offers a range of solutions for new track construction as well as renewal or maintenance of existing railway tracks which can deliver both construction savings and life-cycle optimisation. Our solutions incorporate control of track geometry and rail alignment, stabilisation of the ballast and capping layers and complete drainage systems. 4 GEOFABRICS.CO THE RAIL CORRIDOR A rail track is made up of the rail, the fastening system, sleepers, ballast and capping/structural layer. The system needs to survive the trafficking and climate so that the subgrade is adequately protected and that the performance of the track is effectively supported during the design life. A primary function of the capping/structural fill layers is to distribute forces to make sure that the stresses in the subgrade are at a satisfactory level. The use of geosynthetics within the ballast and capping/structural fill layers can significantly reduce track substructure renewal costs as well as enhancing its performance, reducing maintenance costs and increasing the lifetime of the design. In order to understand which materials will enhance the system we must first examine the track sub-structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoweb Earth Retention Technical Overview
    PRESTO GEOWEB® EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM TECHNICAL OVERVIEW GEOWEB GRAVITY WALL GEOWEB ZONED GRAVITY WALL GEOWEB BACKFILL RETAINED GEOWEB BACKFILL RETAINED LAYERS SOIL SOIL LAYERS SOIL SOIL FOUNDATION SOIL FOUNDATION SOIL GEOCOMPOSITE GRAVITY WALL GEOWEB FACIA STRUCTURALLY STABLE GEOWEB BACKFILL RETAINED GEOWEB SOIL OR ROCK LAYERS SOIL SOIL LAYERS GEOSYNTHETIC BACKFILL SOIL FOUNDATION SOIL FOUNDATION SOIL FREE-STANDING FREE-STANDING GEOCOMPOSITE WALL GEOWEB WALL GEOWEB GEOWEB LAYERS LAYERS GEOSYNTHETIC FOUNDATION SOIL FOUNDATION SOIL PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS 670 N PERKINS STREET, APPLETON, WISCONSIN, USA 54914 Ph: 920-738-1707 or 800-548-3424 ■ Fax: 920-738-1222 e-mail: [email protected] WWW.PRESTOGEO.COM/ GWERTO 15 FEB-08 PRESTO GEOWEB® EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM TECHNICAL OVERVIEW Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1 Vegetated Wall ................................................................................................................... 1 Table 1 Geoweb Earth Retention Structure Selection Guidelines.................................................... 2 Geoweb® System Advantages..................................................................................................................... 2 Durability ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Performance.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Geocells
    The History of Geocells In the late 1970's Presto co-invented the technology known as cellular confinement with the US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (WES). The early applications of cellular confinement or geocells consisted primarily of stabilised, expedient sand roads for military vehicles. What many people may not know about the early development of the geocell cellular confinement system is that the material wasn’t always black in colour or plastic? In fact the early testing of a grid confinement system included wax coated craft paper; a plastic drainage pipe matrix fastened with staples; paper-thin, hexagonal glued aluminium; low and medium density recycled materials; pure polyethylene without UV stabilisation; and square cells similar to old fashioned egg carton separators. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contacted Presto Products, a plastics manufacturer, for assistance in developing a stronger grid confinement system that would maintain strength under heavy loads. Working with Steve Webster at the WES Presto’s Gary Bach devised a method to weld polyethylene strips to form a cellular structure that became known as “Sandgrid” and was used by the military primarily for road applications. Side by side cost/performance testing of a plastic geocell (termed “roadbase”) and aluminium geocells at The Waterways Experimentation Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Circa 1979. After testing various blends of resin, High Density Virgin Polyethylene worked best for weld consistency and structural strength. Since early development with the Corps of Engineers, geocells have been further improved for many other soil stabilisation applications, including the rapid construction of fortified walls in the U.S’s Middle East combat zones starting with Operation Desert Storm in the early 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • GEC 11 Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes
    U. S. Department of Transportation Publication No. FHWA-NHI-10-024 Federal Highway Administration FHWA GEC 011 – Volume I November 2009 NHI Courses No. 132042 and 132043 Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes – Volume I Developed following: AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications, 4th Edition, 2007, Specifications, 2nd Edition, 2004, with with 2008 and 2009 Interims. 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 Interims. NOTICE The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect policy of the Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer's names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the object of this document. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. ACCESSION NO. FHWA-NHI-10-024 FHWA GEC 011-Vol I 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE November 2009 Design of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE and Reinforced Soil Slopes – Volume I 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Ryan R. Berg, P.E.; Barry R. Christopher, Ph.D., P.E. and Naresh C. Samtani, Ph.D., P.E. 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Ryan R. Berg & Associates, Inc. 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. 2190 Leyland Alcove DTFH61-06-D-00019/T-06-001 Woodbury, MN 55125 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular Confinement Systems
    Cellular Cellular Confinement System Confinement TYPAR TYPAR Systems GEOCELL GEOCELL GS Physical 250/ 350/ Properties Units DT1 DC2 150 150 Cell Diameter in 24 20 10 14 Cell Depth in 20 20 6 6 Panel Length in 194 197 197 197 Panel Width in 24.0 54.0 275 275 Panel Coverage ft2 32 73 376 376 Area Panel 3 Volume ft 52 96 200 205 A Cells in Length No. 8 8 34 24 B Cell in Width No. 1 2 29 20 Color Tan Tan Dark Dark Grey Grey Panel Weight lbs 9.5 15 55 37 Panels Per Pallet No 70 44 10 10 Geosynthetics you can trust For more info, call 800-441-2760 A. Stabilize Soil, Control Floods or visit www.typargeosynthetics.com Geosynthetics you can trust B. Control Erosion and Sediment GEOCELLS™ GEOCELL GS™ TYPAR® is a registered trademark of Fiberweb, Inc. GC09_0712 TYPAR GEOCELL TYPAR GEOCELL panels are available in varying widths for effective project design. Capable of withstanding rugged terrain and conditions, the 20” high units can be stacked to create self- Geosynthetics you can trust supporting walls and filled with sand, stone, mulch or other materials. GEOCELLS Flood and Water Control Construction Erosion and Sediment Control Cellular Confinement System TYPAR GEOCELLS panels can be brought TYPAR GEOCELL panels provide superior TYPAR GEOCELL and GEOCELL in by hand, on equipment or dropped sediment control for stormwater runoff. GS panels utilize the strength and from helicopters in emergency situations. The cells offer excellent structural strength permeability of geotextile fabric to The cellular system and durability, while the permeable material create a three dimensional confinement is quicker to fill than allows water to filter through blocking system.
    [Show full text]